Deep Brain Stimulation and Obsessive-compulsive Disorder (STOC2)
Primary Purpose
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS)
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder focused on measuring Deep brain stimulation (DBS), Obsessive compulsive disorder, ventral striatum, subthalamic nucleus
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age comprised between 18 and 60 years
- History of OCD for at least 5 years according to the DSM-IV-TR criteria and characterized by a "good insight", as determined by the BABS ("Brown Assessment of Beliefs Scale")
Severe form of OCD, as evidenced by:
- a score ≥ 25 on the Y-BOCS
- a score > 4 on the CGI scale
- a score =< 40 on the GAF ("global assessment of functioning)
- Lack of therapeutic effects of at least 3 antidepressants selectively blocking serotonin reuptake (SSRI) at least 12 consecutive weeks at the maximal tolerated dose (up to 80 mg/day for fluoxetine, 300 mg/day for fluvoxamine, 200 mg/day for sertraline, 60 mg/day for paroxetine, 60mg/day for citalopram and 250 mg/day for clomipramine) prescribed alone and in combination for at least 1 month with: 1) risperidone or olanzapine or aripiprazole or quetiapine, 2) clomipramine
- Lack of therapeutic effects of behavioral therapy with two different therapists using conventional techniques primarily based on exposure with prevention of ritualized response
- Understand and accept the design and constraints of the present study
- Be a beneficiary or member of health insurance plan
- Provide written consent to the study after receiving clear information
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patient with cognitive impairment with a Mattis scale score ≤ 130
- Patient with other DSM-IV-TR axis I diagnoses (schizophrenia, bipolar, substance abuse or substance dependence), except for generalized anxiety disorder, social phobia or nicotine dependence
- Patient with high suicide risk, as indicated by a score ≥ 2 on the MADRS (item 10)
- Patient with personality disorder corresponding to the clusters A and B, as assessed with the SIDP-IV ("Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality")
- Patient with contraindication for MRI scanning, abnormal brain MRI or serious intercurrent disease
- Patient with contraindication for surgery or anesthesia
- Patient currently treated with anticoagulant or antiplatelet drug
- Be a woman of childbearing age without effective contraception
- Be hospitalized under constraint
- Be under guardianship procedures
- Prohibition on participation in other research, apart from any other non-interventional research
Sites / Locations
- Bordeaux University Hospital
- Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital
- Henri Mondor Hospital
- Grenoble University Hospital
- Lille University Hospital
- Lyon University Hospital
- Marseille University Hospital
- Nice University Hospital
- Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital
- Sainte-Anne Hospital
- Poitiers University Hospital
- Rennes University Hospital
- Strasbourg University Hospital
- Toulouse University Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
DBS of subthalamic nucleus
DBS of ventral striatum
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Combination of three criteria (composite criterion), as follows: a. Y-BOCS score ≤ 16 / and b. Technical feasibility (each leads in the target) / and c. Safety, as assessed by any serial adverse event
Secondary Outcome Measures
Remission as defined by a Y-BOCS score ≤ 16 at M13
Number of electrode contacts correctly located within the chosen brain target (0, 1 or 2)
Monitoring of psychological and somatic complaints made spontaneously by the patient over the course of the present trial, in combination to the semi-structured interview for collecting side effects
Scores on neuropsychological tests exploring all executive functions
Percentage change in the total Y-BOCS score from M1 to M13
Therapeutic response, as indicated by a 35% decrease or more in the Y-BOCS score and a score of 1 or 2 (very much or much improved) on the CGI improvement scale from M1 to M13
Percentage change in the Y-BOCS obsessive and compulsive subscores from M1 to M13
Percentage change in the overall Padua Inventory score, MADRS score, BAS score from M1 to M13
Percentage change in the total and depression and anxiety subscale scores on the HAD scale from M1 and M13
Ratings of functional disability and quality of life
Correlations between efficacy and anatomical positioning of both stimulation electrodes within the chosen brain target
cost comparison of therapeutic strategies
cost comparison of thérapeutic strategies : classical versus surgical
Cost / effectiveness ration
Cost / effectiveness ratio : cost difference between therapeutic strategies and success rate of DBS
Cost-utility rati
Cost-utility ratio based on SF-36 scores.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01329133
First Posted
April 4, 2011
Last Updated
February 5, 2020
Sponsor
University Hospital, Bordeaux
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01329133
Brief Title
Deep Brain Stimulation and Obsessive-compulsive Disorder
Acronym
STOC2
Official Title
Treatment of Severe and Resistant Obsessive-compulsive Disorder by High-frequency Stimulation of the Ventral Striatum and the Subthalamic Nucleus
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
February 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 4, 2011 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 2019 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University Hospital, Bordeaux
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a relatively common psychiatric condition, which is classically treated by antidepressant medications in combination with psychotherapies. However, both these conventional therapeutic approaches fail to sufficiently improve obsessive-compulsive symptoms in 20-30% of cases. From these considerations, deep brain stimulation (DBS), as a reversible and adjustable surgical procedure, has recently been introduced in the field of resistant OCD. DBS currently uses electrodes with four contacts on each lead, which are bilaterally implanted into the chosen brain structure. DBS consists of the delivery of a high-frequency current through the quadripolar electrodes connected to a battery powered pulse-generating device. Several clinical investigations have shown that DBS, primarily targeting either the ventral striatum (VS) or the subthalamic nucleus (STN), as brain sites of interest because of their particular involvement in the production of OCD symptoms, is able to produce an approximately 40% or greater reduction in clinical symptom intensity in severely chronic and incapacitating forms of OCD. These promising findings lead to propose a comparison of the efficacy, safety and tolerability of DBS choosing either the VS or STN as brain target by conducting a large controlled trial and including a medico-economic analysis for assessing the classical cost/efficacy ratio. In this way, the present study is expected to promote and highlight the importance of DBS, as an effective, safe, well-tolerated and cost-relevant surgical approach for the management of resistant OCD.
Detailed Description
Obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a relatively common psychiatric condition with an estimated lifetime prevalence of 2-3 % of the general population. It is generally characterized by a chronic course leading to a profound impairment in psychosocial functioning and to a marked deterioration in quality of life. Today, the well-established efficacy of antidepressants, acting preferentially by blocking serotonin reuptake, in addition to psychological treatments, have considerably changed the poor prognosis of the illness. However, both conventional therapeutic approaches failed to substantially alleviate obsessive-compulsive symptoms in 20-30% of cases. Deep brain stimulation, as a reversible and adjustable surgical procedure, has recently been introduced in the field of OCD, primarily targeting either the ventral striatum (VS) or the subthalamic nucleus (STN) and leading to an approximately 40% or greater reduction in clinical symptom intensity from baseline levels in severely chronic and resistant forms of OCD. These promising findings lead to propose a comparison of the efficacy, safety and tolerability of DBS choosing either the VS or STN as brain target by conducting a multicenter, parallel-group, randomized, single-blind trial over a 13-month follow-up period. For this purpose, a total population of 28 OCD patients who meet the currently used operational criteria for defining therapeutic resistance will be recruited. The surgical procedure will consist in the implantation of stimulation electrodes with four contacts on each lead, which are stereotactically and bilaterally implanted into the targeted brain structure under local anesthesia. Per-operative, single-unit electrophysiological recordings of the neuronal activity will be performed using five parallel microelectrodes and serving as guide for the implantation of both definitive electrodes. They will be connected to a battery powered pulse-generating device five days later under general anesthesia. Thereafter, psychiatric assessments including both the Y-BOCS ("Yale-Brow Obsessive-compulsive scale") and PI ("Padua Inventory") for measuring OCD symptom severity, the BAS ("Brief Anxiety Scale"), MADRS ("Montgomery and Asberg Depression rating Scale") and HAD ("Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale") for determining anxiety and/or depressive symptom intensity, and the CGI ("Clinical Global Impression") rating scales for evaluating global symptom severity and treatment response will be performed every 3 months beyond the one-month postoperative free-stimulation period. This will be coupled with a large battery of neuropsychological tests exploring all executive functions in combination with precise medical records of side effects for appreciating safety/tolerability of DBS. A cost-effectiveness analysis, as a formal method of comparing DBS and classical therapeutic strategies with regard to their respective resource utilization (costs) and outcomes (effectiveness) will also be carried out. Therefore, the present study may contribute to highlight the special interest of DBS, as an effective, safe, well-tolerated and cost-relevant surgical approach for the management of resistant OCD.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder
Keywords
Deep brain stimulation (DBS), Obsessive compulsive disorder, ventral striatum, subthalamic nucleus
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
31 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
DBS of subthalamic nucleus
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Title
DBS of ventral striatum
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Deep Brain Stimulation (DBS)
Intervention Description
In a first time: Implantation of DBS electrodes, stereotactically, in each hemisphere into the targeted brain structure under local anesthesia. In a second time (next week): installation of the deep brain neurostimulator and connection to the electrodes implanted under general anesthesia. And one month later: beginning of the stimulation.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Combination of three criteria (composite criterion), as follows: a. Y-BOCS score ≤ 16 / and b. Technical feasibility (each leads in the target) / and c. Safety, as assessed by any serial adverse event
Time Frame
Month 13 : one year after stimulation
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Remission as defined by a Y-BOCS score ≤ 16 at M13
Time Frame
Month 13 : one year after stimulation
Title
Number of electrode contacts correctly located within the chosen brain target (0, 1 or 2)
Time Frame
End of surgical procedure (day 1)
Title
Monitoring of psychological and somatic complaints made spontaneously by the patient over the course of the present trial, in combination to the semi-structured interview for collecting side effects
Time Frame
Every 3 months from Month 1 to Month 13
Title
Scores on neuropsychological tests exploring all executive functions
Time Frame
Every 3 months from Month 1 to Month 13
Title
Percentage change in the total Y-BOCS score from M1 to M13
Time Frame
Every 3 months from Month 1 to Month 13
Title
Therapeutic response, as indicated by a 35% decrease or more in the Y-BOCS score and a score of 1 or 2 (very much or much improved) on the CGI improvement scale from M1 to M13
Time Frame
Every 3 months from Month 1 to Month 13
Title
Percentage change in the Y-BOCS obsessive and compulsive subscores from M1 to M13
Time Frame
Every 3 months from Month 1 to Month 13
Title
Percentage change in the overall Padua Inventory score, MADRS score, BAS score from M1 to M13
Time Frame
Every 3 months from Month 1 to Month 13
Title
Percentage change in the total and depression and anxiety subscale scores on the HAD scale from M1 and M13
Time Frame
Every 3 months from Month 1 to Month 13
Title
Ratings of functional disability and quality of life
Time Frame
Every 3 months from Month 1 to Month 13
Title
Correlations between efficacy and anatomical positioning of both stimulation electrodes within the chosen brain target
Time Frame
Every 3 months from Month 1 to Month 13
Title
cost comparison of therapeutic strategies
Description
cost comparison of thérapeutic strategies : classical versus surgical
Time Frame
M-13 and M13 (one year after stimultaion)
Title
Cost / effectiveness ration
Description
Cost / effectiveness ratio : cost difference between therapeutic strategies and success rate of DBS
Time Frame
M-13/ M13 (one year after stimulation)
Title
Cost-utility rati
Description
Cost-utility ratio based on SF-36 scores.
Time Frame
every 3 months from month 1 to month 13
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Age comprised between 18 and 60 years
History of OCD for at least 5 years according to the DSM-IV-TR criteria and characterized by a "good insight", as determined by the BABS ("Brown Assessment of Beliefs Scale")
Severe form of OCD, as evidenced by:
a score ≥ 25 on the Y-BOCS
a score > 4 on the CGI scale
a score =< 40 on the GAF ("global assessment of functioning)
Lack of therapeutic effects of at least 3 antidepressants selectively blocking serotonin reuptake (SSRI) at least 12 consecutive weeks at the maximal tolerated dose (up to 80 mg/day for fluoxetine, 300 mg/day for fluvoxamine, 200 mg/day for sertraline, 60 mg/day for paroxetine, 60mg/day for citalopram and 250 mg/day for clomipramine) prescribed alone and in combination for at least 1 month with: 1) risperidone or olanzapine or aripiprazole or quetiapine, 2) clomipramine
Lack of therapeutic effects of behavioral therapy with two different therapists using conventional techniques primarily based on exposure with prevention of ritualized response
Understand and accept the design and constraints of the present study
Be a beneficiary or member of health insurance plan
Provide written consent to the study after receiving clear information
Exclusion Criteria:
Patient with cognitive impairment with a Mattis scale score ≤ 130
Patient with other DSM-IV-TR axis I diagnoses (schizophrenia, bipolar, substance abuse or substance dependence), except for generalized anxiety disorder, social phobia or nicotine dependence
Patient with high suicide risk, as indicated by a score ≥ 2 on the MADRS (item 10)
Patient with personality disorder corresponding to the clusters A and B, as assessed with the SIDP-IV ("Structured Interview for DSM-IV Personality")
Patient with contraindication for MRI scanning, abnormal brain MRI or serious intercurrent disease
Patient with contraindication for surgery or anesthesia
Patient currently treated with anticoagulant or antiplatelet drug
Be a woman of childbearing age without effective contraception
Be hospitalized under constraint
Be under guardianship procedures
Prohibition on participation in other research, apart from any other non-interventional research
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
BENARD Antoine, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University Hospital Bordeaux, France
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Emmanuel CUNY, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University Hospital Bordeaux, France
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bruno AOUIZERATE, MD-PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Charles Perrens hospital, Bordeaux, France
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Bordeaux University Hospital
City
Bordeaux
ZIP/Postal Code
33000
Country
France
Facility Name
Clermont-Ferrand University Hospital
City
Clermont-Ferrand
ZIP/Postal Code
63003
Country
France
Facility Name
Henri Mondor Hospital
City
Créteil
ZIP/Postal Code
94010
Country
France
Facility Name
Grenoble University Hospital
City
Grenoble
ZIP/Postal Code
38043
Country
France
Facility Name
Lille University Hospital
City
Lille
ZIP/Postal Code
59037
Country
France
Facility Name
Lyon University Hospital
City
Lyon
ZIP/Postal Code
69229
Country
France
Facility Name
Marseille University Hospital
City
Marseille
ZIP/Postal Code
13385
Country
France
Facility Name
Nice University Hospital
City
Nice
ZIP/Postal Code
06202
Country
France
Facility Name
Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75651
Country
France
Facility Name
Sainte-Anne Hospital
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75674
Country
France
Facility Name
Poitiers University Hospital
City
Poitiers
ZIP/Postal Code
86021
Country
France
Facility Name
Rennes University Hospital
City
Rennes
ZIP/Postal Code
35033
Country
France
Facility Name
Strasbourg University Hospital
City
Strasbourg
ZIP/Postal Code
67091
Country
France
Facility Name
Toulouse University Hospital
City
Toulouse
ZIP/Postal Code
31059
Country
France
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
19284243
Citation
Aouizerate B, Cuny E, Bardinet E, Yelnik J, Martin-Guehl C, Rotge JY, Rougier A, Bioulac B, Tignol J, Mallet L, Burbaud P, Guehl D. Distinct striatal targets in treating obsessive-compulsive disorder and major depression. J Neurosurg. 2009 Oct;111(4):775-9. doi: 10.3171/2009.2.JNS0881.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19005196
Citation
Mallet L, Polosan M, Jaafari N, Baup N, Welter ML, Fontaine D, du Montcel ST, Yelnik J, Chereau I, Arbus C, Raoul S, Aouizerate B, Damier P, Chabardes S, Czernecki V, Ardouin C, Krebs MO, Bardinet E, Chaynes P, Burbaud P, Cornu P, Derost P, Bougerol T, Bataille B, Mattei V, Dormont D, Devaux B, Verin M, Houeto JL, Pollak P, Benabid AL, Agid Y, Krack P, Millet B, Pelissolo A; STOC Study Group. Subthalamic nucleus stimulation in severe obsessive-compulsive disorder. N Engl J Med. 2008 Nov 13;359(20):2121-34. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0708514. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2009 Sep 3;361(10):1027.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Deep Brain Stimulation and Obsessive-compulsive Disorder
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs