search
Back to results

International Randomized Comparison Between DES Limus Carbostent and Taxus DES in the Treatment of De-novo Coronary Lesions (NEXT)

Primary Purpose

Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Documented Silent Ischemia

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
DES Limus Carbostent
Taxus Liberté Stent
Sponsored by
CID - Carbostent & Implantable Devices
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Stable Angina

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Patient is eligible for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and for surgical revascularization (CABG)
  • Patient has been informed of the nature of the study and agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent as approved by the Ethical Committee of the respective clinical site
  • Patients with clinical evidence of ischemic heart disease and/or a positive functional study(e.g. stress test); documented stable (CCS I-IV) or unstable angina pectoris (Braunwald class I-II B and C) or documented silent ischemia
  • LVEF>30%
  • Requires treatment of a single de novo lesion in a native coronary artery in one or two different major epicardial vessels (LAD, LCX or RCA). The second lesion must fit with inclusion/exclusion criteria and must be treated with the same study stent as the first lesion
  • Target lesion should be located in a target vessel with a diameter ranging from 3.0 to 3.75 mm
  • Target lesion diameter stenosis > 50% and < 100% by visual estimate, with a TIMI flow of ≥ 1
  • The target lesion must be appropriately covered (margin of 2.5 mm on both sides of the stent) by one study stent (DES Limus Carbostent or Taxus Liberté, according to the randomization arm). Any occurred dissection of the target vessel must be treated with an additional stent (DES Limus Carbostent or Taxus Liberté, according to the randomization arm)
  • Patient that underwent BMS implantation more than 6 months before the enrolment or DES implantation more than 1 year before the enrolment in an other vessel.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Female with childbearing potential or lactating
  • Known sensitivity to sirolimus, paclitaxel, the polymeric matrix, stainless steel or cobalt chromium
  • Acute Q-wave or non Q-wave myocardial infarction within 72 hours, or presents with CK elevation greater than 2 times upper limit normal associated with elevated CK-MB
  • Cardiogenic shock
  • Cerebrovascular accident within the past 6 months
  • Acute or chronic renal dysfunction (defined as creatinine greater than 2.0 mg/dl)
  • Contraindication to aspirin or clopidogrel
  • Thrombocytopenia (platelet count less than 100,000/mm³)
  • Active gastrointestinal bleeding within the past 3 months
  • Known bleeding or hypercoagulable disorder
  • Prior anaphylactic reaction to contrast agents or contrast sensitivity that cannot be controlled with pre-medication
  • Currently under immunosuppressant therapy
  • Currently, or has been treated with either Rapamune or paclitaxel within 12 months of the procedure
  • Active infection
  • Co-morbidities that could interfere with completion of study procedures, or life expectancy less than 1 year;
  • Participating in another investigational drug or device trial that has not completed the primary endpoint or would interfere with the endpoints of this study
  • Patient underwent coronary revascularization to any vessel within 30 days
  • Patient underwent target vessel revascularization within 6 months
  • Target vessel has had prior stent placement
  • Presence of two lesions located in the same vascular territory (same major epicardial vessel)
  • Prior coronary brachytherapy
  • There is a planned target lesion treatment with any technique other than the pre-dilatation balloon angioplasty
  • Treatment of more than two lesions is required at the time of enrolment, or is planned within 30 days following enrolment
  • Any planned surgery within 6 months after index procedure
  • Left main disease greater than 50% diameter stenosis
  • Significant (>50%) stenosis proximal or distal to the target lesion that might require revascularization or impede run off
  • Heavily calcified vessel and/or lesion which cannot be successfully predilated
  • Target lesion is located or supplied by an arterial or venous bypass graft
  • Ostial target lesion or lesion located within 2 mm of a bifurcation
  • Target lesion involves a side branch >2.0 mm in diameter with an ostial disease
  • Target lesion has TIMI 0 flow
  • Target vessel with angiographically visible thrombus or unsuitable for proper stent delivery and deployment.

Sites / Locations

  • Academisch Ziekenhuis Middelheim
  • Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg
  • Clinique les Franciscaines
  • Institut Mutualiste Montsouris
  • Clinique Saint-Hilaire
  • Hôpital de Rangueil
  • Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum
  • Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Careggi
  • Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica del CNR
  • Ospedale S. Camillo

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

DES Limus Carbostent Coronary Stent

Taxus Liberté Coronary Stent

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

angiographic efficacy measurement (mm)
in-stent Late Lumen Loss (LLL) measurement by angiography

Secondary Outcome Measures

QCA measurements in-stent and in-segment
IVUS measurements
Incidence of cardiac death (%)
Stent Thrombosis
Acute success (Device and Procedural success)
Incidence of Myocardial Infarction (%)
Incidence of clinically indicated TLR (%)
Incidence of all deaths (%)
Incidence of all repeat revascularization (%)

Full Information

First Posted
September 24, 2010
Last Updated
April 27, 2018
Sponsor
CID - Carbostent & Implantable Devices
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01373502
Brief Title
International Randomized Comparison Between DES Limus Carbostent and Taxus DES in the Treatment of De-novo Coronary Lesions
Acronym
NEXT
Official Title
International Randomized Comparison Between DES Limus Carbostent and Taxus Drug Eluting Stents in the Treatment of De-novo Coronary Lesions. The NEXT Study.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2009 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
CID - Carbostent & Implantable Devices

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate non-inferiority in terms of safety and efficacy of DES Limus Carbostent compared to the Taxus Liberté in treating de-novo atherosclerotic lesions in native coronary arteries.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stable Angina, Unstable Angina, Documented Silent Ischemia

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
323 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
DES Limus Carbostent Coronary Stent
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Taxus Liberté Coronary Stent
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
DES Limus Carbostent
Intervention Description
DES Limus Carbostent Carbofilm Coated Coronary Stent
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Taxus Liberté Stent
Intervention Description
Taxus Liberté Coronary Stent
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
angiographic efficacy measurement (mm)
Description
in-stent Late Lumen Loss (LLL) measurement by angiography
Time Frame
180 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
QCA measurements in-stent and in-segment
Time Frame
180 days
Title
IVUS measurements
Time Frame
180 days
Title
Incidence of cardiac death (%)
Time Frame
30 days, 180 days, 1, 2 , 3, 4 and 5 years
Title
Stent Thrombosis
Time Frame
acute, 30 days, 180 days, 1 year, > 1 year
Title
Acute success (Device and Procedural success)
Time Frame
acute
Title
Incidence of Myocardial Infarction (%)
Time Frame
30 days, 180 days, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 years
Title
Incidence of clinically indicated TLR (%)
Time Frame
30 days, 180 days, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 years
Title
Incidence of all deaths (%)
Time Frame
30 days, 180 days, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 years
Title
Incidence of all repeat revascularization (%)
Time Frame
30 days, 180 days, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age ≥ 18 years Patient is eligible for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and for surgical revascularization (CABG) Patient has been informed of the nature of the study and agrees to its provisions and has provided written informed consent as approved by the Ethical Committee of the respective clinical site Patients with clinical evidence of ischemic heart disease and/or a positive functional study(e.g. stress test); documented stable (CCS I-IV) or unstable angina pectoris (Braunwald class I-II B and C) or documented silent ischemia LVEF>30% Requires treatment of a single de novo lesion in a native coronary artery in one or two different major epicardial vessels (LAD, LCX or RCA). The second lesion must fit with inclusion/exclusion criteria and must be treated with the same study stent as the first lesion Target lesion should be located in a target vessel with a diameter ranging from 3.0 to 3.75 mm Target lesion diameter stenosis > 50% and < 100% by visual estimate, with a TIMI flow of ≥ 1 The target lesion must be appropriately covered (margin of 2.5 mm on both sides of the stent) by one study stent (DES Limus Carbostent or Taxus Liberté, according to the randomization arm). Any occurred dissection of the target vessel must be treated with an additional stent (DES Limus Carbostent or Taxus Liberté, according to the randomization arm) Patient that underwent BMS implantation more than 6 months before the enrolment or DES implantation more than 1 year before the enrolment in an other vessel. Exclusion Criteria: Female with childbearing potential or lactating Known sensitivity to sirolimus, paclitaxel, the polymeric matrix, stainless steel or cobalt chromium Acute Q-wave or non Q-wave myocardial infarction within 72 hours, or presents with CK elevation greater than 2 times upper limit normal associated with elevated CK-MB Cardiogenic shock Cerebrovascular accident within the past 6 months Acute or chronic renal dysfunction (defined as creatinine greater than 2.0 mg/dl) Contraindication to aspirin or clopidogrel Thrombocytopenia (platelet count less than 100,000/mm³) Active gastrointestinal bleeding within the past 3 months Known bleeding or hypercoagulable disorder Prior anaphylactic reaction to contrast agents or contrast sensitivity that cannot be controlled with pre-medication Currently under immunosuppressant therapy Currently, or has been treated with either Rapamune or paclitaxel within 12 months of the procedure Active infection Co-morbidities that could interfere with completion of study procedures, or life expectancy less than 1 year; Participating in another investigational drug or device trial that has not completed the primary endpoint or would interfere with the endpoints of this study Patient underwent coronary revascularization to any vessel within 30 days Patient underwent target vessel revascularization within 6 months Target vessel has had prior stent placement Presence of two lesions located in the same vascular territory (same major epicardial vessel) Prior coronary brachytherapy There is a planned target lesion treatment with any technique other than the pre-dilatation balloon angioplasty Treatment of more than two lesions is required at the time of enrolment, or is planned within 30 days following enrolment Any planned surgery within 6 months after index procedure Left main disease greater than 50% diameter stenosis Significant (>50%) stenosis proximal or distal to the target lesion that might require revascularization or impede run off Heavily calcified vessel and/or lesion which cannot be successfully predilated Target lesion is located or supplied by an arterial or venous bypass graft Ostial target lesion or lesion located within 2 mm of a bifurcation Target lesion involves a side branch >2.0 mm in diameter with an ostial disease Target lesion has TIMI 0 flow Target vessel with angiographically visible thrombus or unsuitable for proper stent delivery and deployment.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Didier Carrié, Prof
Organizational Affiliation
Hôpital de Rangueil, Toulouse Cedex 4 - France
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Academisch Ziekenhuis Middelheim
City
Antwerpen
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg
City
Genk
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Clinique les Franciscaines
City
Nimes
Country
France
Facility Name
Institut Mutualiste Montsouris
City
Paris
Country
France
Facility Name
Clinique Saint-Hilaire
City
Rouen
Country
France
Facility Name
Hôpital de Rangueil
City
Toulouse Cedex 4
Country
France
Facility Name
Medizinisches Versorgungszentrum
City
Hamburg
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Krankenhaus der Barmherzigen Brüder
City
Trier
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliera Careggi
City
Firenze
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Istituto di Fisiologia Clinica del CNR
City
Massa
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Ospedale S. Camillo
City
Roma
Country
Italy

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22284328
Citation
Carrie D, Berland J, Verheye S, Hauptmann KE, Vrolix M, Violini R, Dibie A, Berti S, Maupas E, Antoniucci D, Schofer J. A multicenter randomized trial comparing amphilimus- with paclitaxel-eluting stents in de novo native coronary artery lesions. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Apr 10;59(15):1371-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2011.12.009. Epub 2012 Jan 25.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

International Randomized Comparison Between DES Limus Carbostent and Taxus DES in the Treatment of De-novo Coronary Lesions

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs