Choosing Opioid Management for Pain and Analyzing Acute Chest Syndrome (ACS) Rates Equally (COMPARE)
Primary Purpose
Pain, Sickle Cell Disease
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Morphine
Nubain
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Pain focused on measuring pain, sickle cell, nubain, morphine, acute chest, side effects
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with sickle cell disease (SS, SC, SβThal) who are hospitalized for acute painful episodes
- 6 years old and < 19 years old
- Normal baseline chest radiograph
- Normal renal and hepatic function within the previous 12 months
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous patient participation in this clinical trial
- Any patient on chronic transfusion Any patient with pulmonary infiltrate on chest radiograph on admission
- Any patient with DSM diagnosis, excluding those with Attention Deficit Disorder, on or off treatment
- Any patient with documented allergy to either study drug
Any patient with known evidence of an underlying disease that would interfere with evaluation of a therapeutic response such as:
- Hepatic dysfunction (3x ALT),
- Renal dysfunction (Cr > 1 children/adolescents, Cr >2 adults),
- Pulmonary Hypertension (TRJ >3.0),
- Cardiac dysfunction.
- Any patient with symptoms of an acute stroke.
- Any patient known or suspected to be pregnant.
- Any patient with priapism
- The patient or guardian who will not give consent or assent to be randomized.
Sites / Locations
- Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Randomizing particiipants to Morphine
Randomization to Nubain
Arm Description
Randomizing participants to Morphine or Nubain for treatment of Sickle Cell Pain Crisis
Randomization toNubain or Morphine for the management of Pain Crisis in Sickle Cell patients
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Acute Chest Syndrome
Number of Participants with Acute Chest Syndrome or A new pulmonry infiltrate on Chest X-ray
Secondary Outcome Measures
Number of Participants Who Experienced Pain Relief
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01380197
First Posted
June 22, 2011
Last Updated
January 23, 2018
Sponsor
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
Collaborators
Atlanta Clinical and Translational Science Institute
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01380197
Brief Title
Choosing Opioid Management for Pain and Analyzing Acute Chest Syndrome (ACS) Rates Equally
Acronym
COMPARE
Official Title
Choosing Opioid Management for Pain and Analyzing ACS Rates Equally
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
January 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 26, 2010 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 14, 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 18, 2016 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
Collaborators
Atlanta Clinical and Translational Science Institute
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The pathophysiology of sickle cell disease (SCD) manifestations, are complex with interactions of intracellular hemoglobin, membrane and endothelial activation but the hallmark remains recurrent and painful vaso-occlusive episodes (VOC). These painful episodes are thought to result from ischemia caused when small blood vessels are occluded by misshapen, inflexible erythrocytes. Painful episodes are the most common cause of hospitalization, morbidity, and impairment for SCD patients. There is no therapy that completely prevents or directly aborts painful events for all patients. Consequently, treatment for acute VOC is primarily supportive using hydration and medicinal pain control. Every pain medication has the potential to relieve pain but is associated with significant limitations and side effects.
The primary hypothesis to be tested in this double blind, randomized controlled trial is that Nalbuphine is equivalent to morphine for pain control and patients will suffer fewer episodes of acute chest syndrome. The investigators also expect subjects will report fewer side effects from respiratory depression, abdominal distention from reduced peristalsis, reduced histamine release causing pruritis and still be provided adequate pain control. Further hypotheses to be tested is ability to recruit patient participants while being treated in the Emergency Department and that continuous infusion of Nalbuphine with accompanying patient controlled analgesia (PCA) is safe and effective in controlling pain, requiring less total opiates consumption, while decreasing length of hospitalization.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pain, Sickle Cell Disease
Keywords
pain, sickle cell, nubain, morphine, acute chest, side effects
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
40 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Randomizing particiipants to Morphine
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Randomizing participants to Morphine or Nubain for treatment of Sickle Cell Pain Crisis
Arm Title
Randomization to Nubain
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Randomization toNubain or Morphine for the management of Pain Crisis in Sickle Cell patients
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Morphine
Intervention Description
Loading Dose: 0.1mg/kg. May repeat every 15 min up to a maximum of 3 total doses until pain controlled.
Continuous rate: 0.01-0.04mg/kg/hr (titrated to comfort level) PCA dose 0.01-0.03 mg/kg maximum 1.6 mg/dose 4 hour dose limit 0.24-0.3 mg/kg (Maximum dosing will not exceed 25 mg/4 hrs).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Nubain
Intervention Description
Loading Dose: 0.1mg/kg. May repeat every 15 min up to a maximum of 3 total doses until pain controlled.
Continuous rate: 0.01-0.04mg/kg/hr (titrated to comfort level) PCA dose 0.01-0.03 mg/kg maximum 1.6 mg/dose 4 hour dose limit 0.24-0.3 mg/kg (Maximum dosing will not exceed 25 mg/4 hrs).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Acute Chest Syndrome
Description
Number of Participants with Acute Chest Syndrome or A new pulmonry infiltrate on Chest X-ray
Time Frame
3 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants Who Experienced Pain Relief
Time Frame
2 days
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
6 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
19 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients with sickle cell disease (SS, SC, SβThal) who are hospitalized for acute painful episodes
6 years old and < 19 years old
Normal baseline chest radiograph
Normal renal and hepatic function within the previous 12 months
Exclusion Criteria:
Previous patient participation in this clinical trial
Any patient on chronic transfusion Any patient with pulmonary infiltrate on chest radiograph on admission
Any patient with DSM diagnosis, excluding those with Attention Deficit Disorder, on or off treatment
Any patient with documented allergy to either study drug
Any patient with known evidence of an underlying disease that would interfere with evaluation of a therapeutic response such as:
Hepatic dysfunction (3x ALT),
Renal dysfunction (Cr > 1 children/adolescents, Cr >2 adults),
Pulmonary Hypertension (TRJ >3.0),
Cardiac dysfunction.
Any patient with symptoms of an acute stroke.
Any patient known or suspected to be pregnant.
Any patient with priapism
The patient or guardian who will not give consent or assent to be randomized.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30303
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Choosing Opioid Management for Pain and Analyzing Acute Chest Syndrome (ACS) Rates Equally
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs