search
Back to results

Comparison Between Probe-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy, White-light Endoscopy and Virtual Chromoendoscopy (pCLE-GCEP)

Primary Purpose

Intestinal Metaplasia, Intestinal Dysplasia

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
Singapore
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Gastroscopy
Sponsored by
National University Hospital, Singapore
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Intestinal Metaplasia focused on measuring intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia, probe-based confocal endomicroscopy

Eligibility Criteria

50 Years - 90 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • The subject is Chinese
  • The subject is greater than 50 years of age
  • The subject satisfies one or more of the following criteria:

    • has (had) a history of dyspepsia of at least 4 weeks or more. Dyspeptic symptoms include bloating, epigastric discomfort and early satiety
    • has a family history of gastric cancer
    • has a medical condition for which an OGD is indicated.
  • Has past history of intestinal metaplasia or dysplasia
  • The subject must have personally signed and dated the patient informed consent form indicating that he/she has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the study.
  • The subject must be willing and able to comply with scheduled visits and other study procedures

Exclusion Criteria:

  • patients who cannot undergo gastroscopies
  • have a personal history of stomach cancer or surgery
  • any disabling illnesses
  • are pregnant or breast-feeding
  • have bronchial asthma or a known allergy to fluorescein
  • have renal impairment with serum creatinine above the upper limit of normal
  • have uncorrected coagulopathy or severe thrombocytopenia precluding biopsy
  • unable to provide informed consent

Sites / Locations

  • National University HospitalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Group A

Group B

Arm Description

Group A: WLE followed by AFI followed by NBI followed by pCLE.

Group B: WLE followed by NBI followed by AFI followed by pCLE.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of accurate endoscopic diagnosis made with pCLE compared with histopathology diagnosis
For each patient, the minimum sites of pCLE examination must consist of 2 sites at antrum, 1 site at the incisura, 2 sites at the corpus, and 1 site at the cardia. When suspicious lesions are present, more sites of pCLE examination will be allowed. Each site of pCLE examination will be biopsied and sent for histology.The pCLE examination will be video recorded and interpretation will be done independently on a separate day from the endoscopy day.The analysis will be by per biopsy site matched with corresponding video sequence

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
June 26, 2011
Last Updated
July 10, 2012
Sponsor
National University Hospital, Singapore
Collaborators
National Medical Research Council (NMRC), Singapore
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01398579
Brief Title
Comparison Between Probe-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy, White-light Endoscopy and Virtual Chromoendoscopy
Acronym
pCLE-GCEP
Official Title
Prospective Comparison Between Probe-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy, White-light Endoscopy and Virtual Chromoendoscopy for the Diagnosis of Gastric Pre-neoplastic and Neoplastic Lesions (pCLE-GCEP)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2011
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
September 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 2012 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 2012 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
National University Hospital, Singapore
Collaborators
National Medical Research Council (NMRC), Singapore

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The investigators hypothesis that clinical applicability and overall diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of pCLE for diagnosing gastric preneoplastic and neoplastic lesions is acceptable pCLE, as compared to white-light endoscopy (WLE), AFI and magnifying NBI has higher sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosing gastric pre-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions
Detailed Description
Patients will be recruited from an ongoing study - Gastric Cancer Epidemiology, Clinical and Genetic Programme Cohort Study (GCEP). GCEP is a prospective cohort study aiming to enroll 3,000 Singapore- Chinese subjects aged >50 years, and offers screening by endoscopy and systematic follow-up for a minimum of 5 years. 20 patients will be randomized into two groups. All of them will be examined using four different endoscopy imaging technologies by one trained specialist. 10 patients will be in group A and another 10 patients will be in group B. Group A: WLE followed by AFI followed by NBI followed by pCLE. Group B: WLE followed by NBI followed by AFI followed by pCLE. The difference between two groups is the sequence of two endoscopy imaging modes - AFI and NBI. Diagnosis made during NBI and AFI must be made based on pre-defined criteria, and should not be influenced by the preceding imaging modality. To control for the possible bias on the third imaging modality caused by influence from the preceding imaging modality, patients are randomized to receive NBI before AFI or AFI before NBI. Endoscopic diagnosis will be made for each suspected lesion with every imaging modality. The biopsy of lesions will be taken after pCLE examination is completed and sent for histology. In the absence of suspicious lesions, the area of examination will be as follows (as stated in main GCEP protocol): A1- lesser curvature of the antrum, within 2-3cm of the pylorus. A2- greater curvature of the antrum, within 2-3cm of the pylorus. IA- incisura angularis. B1- lesser curvature of the corpus, 4cm proximal to the angulus. B2- middle portion of the greater curvature of the corpus, 8cm from the cardia. Cardia (C) - within 1 cm below the OGJ (defined as the point where gastric folds disappear). The results will be compared with the gold standard diagnosis - histopathology diagnosis. The sensitivity and specificity for each imaging tool will be calculated accordingly.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Intestinal Metaplasia, Intestinal Dysplasia
Keywords
intestinal metaplasia, dysplasia, probe-based confocal endomicroscopy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Phase 1
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
20 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Group A
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Group A: WLE followed by AFI followed by NBI followed by pCLE.
Arm Title
Group B
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Group B: WLE followed by NBI followed by AFI followed by pCLE.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Gastroscopy
Other Intervention Name(s)
OGD
Intervention Description
20 patients will be randomized into two groups. All of them will be examined using four different endoscopy imaging technologies by one trained specialist. 10 patients will be in group A and another 10 patients will be in group B. Group A: WLE followed by AFI followed by NBI followed by pCLE. Group B: WLE followed by NBI followed by AFI followed by pCLE.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of accurate endoscopic diagnosis made with pCLE compared with histopathology diagnosis
Description
For each patient, the minimum sites of pCLE examination must consist of 2 sites at antrum, 1 site at the incisura, 2 sites at the corpus, and 1 site at the cardia. When suspicious lesions are present, more sites of pCLE examination will be allowed. Each site of pCLE examination will be biopsied and sent for histology.The pCLE examination will be video recorded and interpretation will be done independently on a separate day from the endoscopy day.The analysis will be by per biopsy site matched with corresponding video sequence
Time Frame
An average of 1 week for which histology report will be out for comparison

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
90 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: The subject is Chinese The subject is greater than 50 years of age The subject satisfies one or more of the following criteria: has (had) a history of dyspepsia of at least 4 weeks or more. Dyspeptic symptoms include bloating, epigastric discomfort and early satiety has a family history of gastric cancer has a medical condition for which an OGD is indicated. Has past history of intestinal metaplasia or dysplasia The subject must have personally signed and dated the patient informed consent form indicating that he/she has been informed of all pertinent aspects of the study. The subject must be willing and able to comply with scheduled visits and other study procedures Exclusion Criteria: patients who cannot undergo gastroscopies have a personal history of stomach cancer or surgery any disabling illnesses are pregnant or breast-feeding have bronchial asthma or a known allergy to fluorescein have renal impairment with serum creatinine above the upper limit of normal have uncorrected coagulopathy or severe thrombocytopenia precluding biopsy unable to provide informed consent
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Lee Guan Lim
Phone
67795555
Email
lee_guan_lim@nuhs.edu.sg
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Khek Yu Ho, Prof
Organizational Affiliation
NUHS
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
National University Hospital
City
Singapore
ZIP/Postal Code
119974
Country
Singapore
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lee Guan Lim, Doctor
Phone
67795555
Email
lee_guan_lim@nuhs.edu.sg

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17001572
Citation
Uedo N, Ishihara R, Iishi H, Yamamoto S, Yamamoto S, Yamada T, Imanaka K, Takeuchi Y, Higashino K, Ishiguro S, Tatsuta M. A new method of diagnosing gastric intestinal metaplasia: narrow-band imaging with magnifying endoscopy. Endoscopy. 2006 Aug;38(8):819-24. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-944632.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12024128
Citation
Eisen GM, Baron TH, Dominitz JA, Faigel DO, Goldstein JL, Johanson JF, Mallery JS, Raddawi HM, Vargo JJ 2nd, Waring JP, Fanelli RD, Wheeler-Harbough J; American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Complications of upper GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2002 Jun;55(7):784-93. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(02)70404-5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18755886
Citation
Pohl H, Rosch T, Vieth M, Koch M, Becker V, Anders M, Khalifa AC, Meining A. Miniprobe confocal laser microscopy for the detection of invisible neoplasia in patients with Barrett's oesophagus. Gut. 2008 Dec;57(12):1648-53. doi: 10.1136/gut.2008.157461. Epub 2008 Aug 28.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19909747
Citation
Buchner AM, Shahid MW, Heckman MG, Krishna M, Ghabril M, Hasan M, Crook JE, Gomez V, Raimondo M, Woodward T, Wolfsen HC, Wallace MB. Comparison of probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy with virtual chromoendoscopy for classification of colon polyps. Gastroenterology. 2010 Mar;138(3):834-42. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2009.10.053. Epub 2009 Nov 10.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19876586
Citation
Inoue T, Uedo N, Ishihara R, Kawaguchi T, Kawada N, Chatani R, Kizu T, Tamai C, Takeuchi Y, Higashino K, Iishi H, Tatsuta M, Tomita Y, Toth E. Autofluorescence imaging videoendoscopy in the diagnosis of chronic atrophic fundal gastritis. J Gastroenterol. 2010;45(1):45-51. doi: 10.1007/s00535-009-0150-7. Epub 2009 Oct 30.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
18008201
Citation
Kato M, Kaise M, Yonezawa J, Yoshida Y, Tajiri H. Autofluorescence endoscopy versus conventional white light endoscopy for the detection of superficial gastric neoplasia: a prospective comparative study. Endoscopy. 2007 Nov;39(11):937-41. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-966857.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
20189506
Citation
Ezoe Y, Muto M, Horimatsu T, Minashi K, Yano T, Sano Y, Chiba T, Ohtsu A. Magnifying narrow-band imaging versus magnifying white-light imaging for the differential diagnosis of gastric small depressive lesions: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2010 Mar;71(3):477-84. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.10.036.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
18656862
Citation
Yao K, Iwashita A, Tanabe H, Nishimata N, Nagahama T, Maki S, Takaki Y, Hirai F, Hisabe T, Nishimura T, Matsui T. White opaque substance within superficial elevated gastric neoplasia as visualized by magnification endoscopy with narrow-band imaging: a new optical sign for differentiating between adenoma and carcinoma. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Sep;68(3):574-80. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.04.011. Epub 2008 Jul 26.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
19595318
Citation
Kato M, Kaise M, Yonezawa J, Goda K, Toyoizumi H, Yoshimura N, Yoshida Y, Kawamura M, Tajiri H. Trimodal imaging endoscopy may improve diagnostic accuracy of early gastric neoplasia: a feasibility study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Nov;70(5):899-906. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2009.03.1171.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
20002025
Citation
Wallace MB, Meining A, Canto MI, Fockens P, Miehlke S, Roesch T, Lightdale CJ, Pohl H, Carr-Locke D, Lohr M, Coron E, Filoche B, Giovannini M, Moreau J, Schmidt C, Kiesslich R. The safety of intravenous fluorescein for confocal laser endomicroscopy in the gastrointestinal tract. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 Mar;31(5):548-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2036.2009.04207.x. Epub 2009 Nov 30.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
23892761
Citation
Lim LG, Yeoh KG, Srivastava S, Chan YH, Teh M, Ho KY. Comparison of probe-based confocal endomicroscopy with virtual chromoendoscopy and white-light endoscopy for diagnosis of gastric intestinal metaplasia. Surg Endosc. 2013 Dec;27(12):4649-55. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3098-x. Epub 2013 Jul 27.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Comparison Between Probe-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy, White-light Endoscopy and Virtual Chromoendoscopy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs