search
Back to results

Intravenous Ondansetron to Attenuate the Hypotensive, Bradycardic Response to Spinal Anesthesia in Healthy Parturients

Primary Purpose

Hypotension, Pregnancy

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
ondansetron
placebo
Sponsored by
University of Virginia
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Hypotension focused on measuring c-section, Hypotension after spinal anesthesia for C-section

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 45 Years (Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Elective Caesarean section
  • Consent to be in the study
  • Age 18-45
  • ASA 1 or 2

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal
  • Patients with known allergy to ondansetron will be excluded
  • Contraindications to spinal anesthetic

    • Known Coagulopathy (acquired e.g. anticoagulation or existing such as liver disease; using patient history, physical examination to determine bleeding risks, a platelet count under 100 or a PT INR over 1.4)
    • Severely altered anatomy (e.g. post surgical changes)
    • Existing neurological deficits (Women with a history of migraine or tension headache will be allowed to enroll. More severe conditions with daily life limiting symptoms will be excluded. Examples include epilepsy, pseudotumor cerebri, prior stroke with persistent neurologic deficits, or any motor or sensory neuropathy with existing deficits)
    • Skin infection overlying site

Sites / Locations

  • University of Virginia Health System

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

ondansetron

Placebo

Arm Description

ondansetron 8 mg IV will be administered prior to placement of the spinal anesthesia

Ondansetron 8 mg IV or Placebo will be administered prior to placement of the spinal anesthestic

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability"
hypotension & bradycardia will be recorded from the placement of the spinal through the end of surgical c-section

Secondary Outcome Measures

dosage of vasopressors administered
vasopressors administered during surgery
number of episodes of nausea
occurrence & intensity of itching
pain scores reported by the patient
dosage of anticholinergics administered

Full Information

First Posted
September 16, 2010
Last Updated
March 9, 2022
Sponsor
University of Virginia
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01414777
Brief Title
Intravenous Ondansetron to Attenuate the Hypotensive, Bradycardic Response to Spinal Anesthesia in Healthy Parturients
Official Title
IRB-HSR# 14583: Intravenous Ondansetron to Attenuate the Hypotensive, Bradycardic Response to Spinal Anesthesia in Healthy Parturients
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
June 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 2011 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Virginia

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The investigators hypothesize that given prophylactically, intravenous ondansetron will attenuate the drop in blood pressure and heart rate frequently seen after spinal anesthesia. Eighty-six American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I or II in preoperative patient assessment, parturients age of 18 to 45 years scheduled to undergo elective caesarean section will be enrolled. Patients will be randomized to 2 groups: the ondansetron group, receiving 8 mg intravenous ondansetron diluted in 10 mL of saline; or the placebo group, who were administered 10 mL of saline given 5 minutes prior to performing the spinal anesthetic. Investigational Pharmacy will randomize and dispense study drug. Baseline measurements of vital signs will be taken. Otherwise standard management will then be used: Patients must be NPO for 8 hours Pulse oximetry, EKG monitoring, noninvasive blood pressure at a minimum of every 3 minutes, more frequently if decided by the provider. Standard lumbar puncture in a sitting position the L3-L4 or L4-L5 Whitacre pencil-point, 25 gauge Injectate: 2 mL of 0.75% hyperbaric bupivacaine, 100 mcg preservative free morphine, 20 mcg fentanyl Immediately after completing the subarachnoid injection, patients will be laid supine with left lateral uterine displacement The sensory level of anesthesia will be assessed in the standard fashion every five minutes using ice. The motor component will tested using the Bromage scale for spinal anesthesia (0, no paralysis; 1, inability to lift the thigh [only knee/feet]; 2, inability to flex the knee [only feet]; 3, inability to move any joint in the legs).
Detailed Description
Over the last 30 years, regional anesthesia has emerged as the method of choice for elective caesarean section because it avoids risks involved in managing the airway of the parturient and has the added significant benefit of mother being awake for the birth of her child. Indeed, this changing practice patterns is thought to have lead to a significant drop in anesthesia related maternal morbidity and mortality. At the same time, regional anesthesia is associated with both minor and significant risk. Most common among these effects is hypotension and bradycardia, occurring in 33% and 13% of cases, respectively. In the pregnant patient, supine positioning required for surgery is associated hypotension due to aortocaval compression by the gravid uterus in 8% of patients, even without spinal anesthesia. During caesarean section, the combination of these factors can lead to hypotension include decreased placental blood flow, impaired fetal oxygenation and fetal acidosis. Maternal symptoms of low blood pressures include nausea, vomiting, dizziness, and decreased consciousness. This situation has lead to dozens of publications seeking to prevent or minimize the hypotensive response. Hypotension after a spinal is initially due to a blockade of sympathetic fibers leading to a drop in systemic vascular resistance. Spinal-induced bradycardia is multifactorial but is in part due to the Bezold-Jarisch Reflex (BJR). This reflex is mediated by serotonin receptors within the wall of the ventricle in response to systemic hypotension. These receptors, the 5HT3 subtype, cause an increase efferent vagal signaling when bound by serotonin released during hypovolemic states, clinically leading to bradycardia and further hypotension. Ondansetron, a widely used anti-emetic and serotonin antagonist, has been safely used to blunt the BJR, resulting in less bradycardia and hypotension first in animals and later in humans undergoing spinal anesthesia. , Use During Pregnancy: The FDA labels ondansetron as a class B. Studies in pregnant rats and rabbits at doses up to 70 times higher than clinically used doses revealed no evidence of impaired fertility or harm to the fetus due to ondansetron. There are, however, few prospective studies in pregnant women. Nevertheless, the drug is widely used has a long safety history for use in pregnancy and during anesthesia for caesarean section.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hypotension, Pregnancy
Keywords
c-section, Hypotension after spinal anesthesia for C-section

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Phase 2, Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
68 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
ondansetron
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
ondansetron 8 mg IV will be administered prior to placement of the spinal anesthesia
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Ondansetron 8 mg IV or Placebo will be administered prior to placement of the spinal anesthestic
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
ondansetron
Other Intervention Name(s)
epidural
Intervention Description
Ondansetron 8mg IV or placebo will be administered prior to placement of the spinal anesthetic
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
placebo
Other Intervention Name(s)
epidural
Intervention Description
placebo or ondansetron 8mg IV will be administered prior to placement of the spinal anesthetic
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants with Adverse Events as a Measure of Safety and Tolerability"
Description
hypotension & bradycardia will be recorded from the placement of the spinal through the end of surgical c-section
Time Frame
day 1
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
dosage of vasopressors administered
Description
vasopressors administered during surgery
Time Frame
day one
Title
number of episodes of nausea
Time Frame
24 hours after surgery
Title
occurrence & intensity of itching
Time Frame
24 hours after surgery
Title
pain scores reported by the patient
Time Frame
24 hours after surgery
Title
dosage of anticholinergics administered
Time Frame
24 hours after surgery

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
45 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Elective Caesarean section Consent to be in the study Age 18-45 ASA 1 or 2 Exclusion Criteria: Patient refusal Patients with known allergy to ondansetron will be excluded Contraindications to spinal anesthetic Known Coagulopathy (acquired e.g. anticoagulation or existing such as liver disease; using patient history, physical examination to determine bleeding risks, a platelet count under 100 or a PT INR over 1.4) Severely altered anatomy (e.g. post surgical changes) Existing neurological deficits (Women with a history of migraine or tension headache will be allowed to enroll. More severe conditions with daily life limiting symptoms will be excluded. Examples include epilepsy, pseudotumor cerebri, prior stroke with persistent neurologic deficits, or any motor or sensory neuropathy with existing deficits) Skin infection overlying site
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jordan Hackworth, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Virginia Anesthesiology
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Virginia Health System
City
Charlottesville
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
22908
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
12972749
Citation
Hawkins JL. Anesthesia-related maternal mortality. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Sep;46(3):679-87. doi: 10.1097/00003081-200309000-00020. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17525583
Citation
Mhyre JM, Riesner MN, Polley LS, Naughton NN. A series of anesthesia-related maternal deaths in Michigan, 1985-2003. Anesthesiology. 2007 Jun;106(6):1096-104. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000267592.34626.6b.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15220784
Citation
Lee LA, Posner KL, Domino KB, Caplan RA, Cheney FW. Injuries associated with regional anesthesia in the 1980s and 1990s: a closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology. 2004 Jul;101(1):143-52. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200407000-00023.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11388543
Citation
Liu SS, McDonald SB. Current issues in spinal anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 2001 May;94(5):888-906. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200105000-00030. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7547039
Citation
Jackson R, Reid JA, Thorburn J. Volume preloading is not essential to prevent spinal-induced hypotension at caesarean section. Br J Anaesth. 1995 Sep;75(3):262-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/75.3.262.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8164943
Citation
Kinsella SM, Lohmann G. Supine hypotensive syndrome. Obstet Gynecol. 1994 May;83(5 Pt 1):774-88.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
8063445
Citation
Rout CC, Rocke DA. Prevention of hypotension following spinal anesthesia for cesarean section. Int Anesthesiol Clin. 1994 Spring;32(2):117-35. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7191222
Citation
Mathru M, Rao TL, Kartha RK, Shanmugham M, Jacobs HK. Intravenous albumin administration for prevention of spinal hypotension during cesarean section. Anesth Analg. 1980 Sep;59(9):655-8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16095463
Citation
Dahlgren G, Granath F, Pregner K, Rosblad PG, Wessel H, Irestedt L. Colloid vs. crystalloid preloading to prevent maternal hypotension during spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean section. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Sep;49(8):1200-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00730.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10598596
Citation
Ueyama H, He YL, Tanigami H, Mashimo T, Yoshiya I. Effects of crystalloid and colloid preload on blood volume in the parturient undergoing spinal anesthesia for elective Cesarean section. Anesthesiology. 1999 Dec;91(6):1571-6. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199912000-00006.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
7574020
Citation
Riley ET, Cohen SE, Rubenstein AJ, Flanagan B. Prevention of hypotension after spinal anesthesia for cesarean section: six percent hetastarch versus lactated Ringer's solution. Anesth Analg. 1995 Oct;81(4):838-42. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199510000-00031.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12717149
Citation
Campagna JA, Carter C. Clinical relevance of the Bezold-Jarisch reflex. Anesthesiology. 2003 May;98(5):1250-60. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200305000-00030. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17703282
Citation
Villalon CM, Centurion D. Cardiovascular responses produced by 5-hydroxytriptamine:a pharmacological update on the receptors/mechanisms involved and therapeutic implications. Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2007 Oct;376(1-2):45-63. doi: 10.1007/s00210-007-0179-1. Epub 2007 Aug 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2309912
Citation
Veelken R, Sawin LL, DiBona GF. Epicardial serotonin receptors in circulatory control in conscious Sprague-Dawley rats. Am J Physiol. 1990 Feb;258(2 Pt 2):H466-72. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.1990.258.2.H466.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18675744
Citation
Owczuk R, Wenski W, Polak-Krzeminska A, Twardowski P, Arszulowicz R, Dylczyk-Sommer A, Wujtewicz MA, Sawicka W, Morzuch E, Smietanski M, Wujtewicz M. Ondansetron given intravenously attenuates arterial blood pressure drop due to spinal anesthesia: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2008 Jul-Aug;33(4):332-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rapm.2008.01.010.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15010403
Citation
Martinek RM. Witnessed asystole during spinal anesthesia treated with atropine and ondansetron: a case report. Can J Anaesth. 2004 Mar;51(3):226-30. doi: 10.1007/BF03019100.
Results Reference
background
Citation
FDA Prescribing Information. Web retrieved 7/8/2009 .http://www.fda.org
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2533905
Citation
Tucker ML, Jackson MR, Scales MD, Spurling NW, Tweats DJ, Capel-Edwards K. Ondansetron: pre-clinical safety evaluation. Eur J Cancer Clin Oncol. 1989;25 Suppl 1:S79-93.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15327608
Citation
Einarson A, Maltepe C, Navioz Y, Kennedy D, Tan MP, Koren G. The safety of ondansetron for nausea and vomiting of pregnancy: a prospective comparative study. BJOG. 2004 Sep;111(9):940-3. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2004.00236.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9065130
Citation
Sullivan CA, Johnson CA, Roach H, Martin RW, Stewart DK, Morrison JC. A pilot study of intravenous ondansetron for hyperemesis gravidarum. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996 May;174(5):1565-8. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9378(96)70607-5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11807187
Citation
Kuscu NK, Koyuncu F. Hyperemesis gravidarum: current concepts and management. Postgrad Med J. 2002 Feb;78(916):76-9. doi: 10.1136/pmj.78.916.76.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16328314
Citation
Asker C, Norstedt Wikner B, Kallen B. Use of antiemetic drugs during pregnancy in Sweden. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2005 Dec;61(12):899-906. doi: 10.1007/s00228-005-0055-1. Epub 2005 Nov 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17898396
Citation
Phillips TW Jr, Broussard DM, Sumrall WD 3rd, Hart SR. Intraoperative oxygen administration does not reduce the incidence or severity of nausea or vomiting associated with neuraxial anesthesia for cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2007 Oct;105(4):1113-7, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000278626.54116.0e.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17242102
Citation
Siddik-Sayyid SM, Aouad MT, Taha SK, Azar MS, Hakki MA, Kaddoum RN, Nasr VG, Yazbek VG, Baraka AS. Does ondansetron or granisetron prevent subarachnoid morphine-induced pruritus after cesarean delivery? Anesth Analg. 2007 Feb;104(2):421-4. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000253668.10453.de.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10866907
Citation
Yeh HM, Chen LK, Lin CJ, Chan WH, Chen YP, Lin CS, Sun WZ, Wang MJ, Tsai SK. Prophylactic intravenous ondansetron reduces the incidence of intrathecal morphine-induced pruritus in patients undergoing cesarean delivery. Anesth Analg. 2000 Jul;91(1):172-5. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200007000-00032.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12031749
Citation
Yazigi A, Chalhoub V, Madi-Jebara S, Haddad F, Hayek G. Prophylactic ondansetron is effective in the treatment of nausea and vomiting but not on pruritus after cesarean delivery with intrathecal sufentanil-morphine. J Clin Anesth. 2002 May;14(3):183-6. doi: 10.1016/s0952-8180(01)00381-6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16430549
Citation
Sarvela PJ, Halonen PM, Soikkeli AI, Kainu JP, Korttila KT. Ondansetron and tropisetron do not prevent intraspinal morphine- and fentanyl-induced pruritus in elective cesarean delivery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2006 Feb;50(2):239-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2006.00934.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10995148
Citation
Abouleish EI, Rashid S, Haque S, Giezentanner A, Joynton P, Chuang AZ. Ondansetron versus placebo for the control of nausea and vomiting during Caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1999 May;54(5):479-82. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.00798.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19535708
Citation
George RB, Allen TK, Habib AS. Serotonin receptor antagonists for the prevention and treatment of pruritus, nausea, and vomiting in women undergoing cesarean delivery with intrathecal morphine: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Anesth Analg. 2009 Jul;109(1):174-82. doi: 10.1213/ane.0b013e3181a45a6b.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9459232
Citation
Tang J, Wang B, White PF, Watcha MF, Qi J, Wender RH. The effect of timing of ondansetron administration on its efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and cost-benefit as a prophylactic antiemetic in the ambulatory setting. Anesth Analg. 1998 Feb;86(2):274-82. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199802000-00010.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26066384
Citation
Terkawi AS, Tiouririne M, Mehta SH, Hackworth JM, Tsang S, Durieux ME. Ondansetron Does Not Attenuate Hemodynamic Changes in Patients Undergoing Elective Cesarean Delivery Using Subarachnoid Anesthesia: A Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Randomized Trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jul-Aug;40(4):344-8. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000274.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Intravenous Ondansetron to Attenuate the Hypotensive, Bradycardic Response to Spinal Anesthesia in Healthy Parturients

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs