search
Back to results

LOGIC-Insulin Algorithm-guided Versus Nurse-directed Blood Glucose Control During Critical Illness (LOGIC-1)

Primary Purpose

Critical Illness

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Belgium
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Nurse directed insulin titration
LOGIC-Insulin
Sponsored by
Greet Van den Berghe
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Critical Illness focused on measuring critical illness, intensive care, insulin, glucose, algorithm, blood glucose control

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Aged 18 years or more
  • Admitted to the ICU
  • Already receiving or needing insulin infusion for blood glucose control

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Not critically ill (eating, not mechanically ventilated)
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding
  • Previous inclusion into the trial
  • Included in other trial
  • Moribund
  • Diabetes coma
  • No arterial line available

Sites / Locations

  • Dept Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

LOGIC-Insulin

Nurse-directed

Arm Description

Blood glucose control (80-110 mg/dL) guided by the LOGIC-Insulin algorithm

Nurse-directed blood glucose control (80-110 mg/dL)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Glycemic Penalty Index (GPI) during the intervention
Adequacy of reaching and maintaining the target range for blood glucose during the intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Proportion of patients with severe hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dL) during the intervention
Proportion of patients to have had one or more episodes of severe hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dL) during the intervention
Incidence of severe hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dL) during the intervention
Number of severe hypoglycemic values as a fraction of all blood glucose measurements during the intervention
Blood glucose level per treatment group during the intervention
Hyperglycemic index (HGI) during the intervention
Adequacy of reaching and maintaining the target range for blood glucose during the intervention
Daily maximal blood glucose difference during the intervention
Marker of blood glucose variability
Proportion of patients with common hypoglycemia (<60 mg/dL) during the intervention
Proportion of patients to have had one or more episodes of common hypoglycemia during the intervention
Interval between blood glucose measurements during the intervention
Marker of workload
Percentage of time in target zone (80-110 mg/dL) during the intervention
Adequacy of reaching and maintaining the target range for blood glucose during the intervention
Length of stay in ICU
Length of stay in hospital
Hospital mortality
Patients who will have been discharged from hospital before 90 days post-randomization will be regarded as survivors
Incidence of common hypoglycemia (<60 mg/dL) during the intervention
Number of common hypoglycemic values as a fraction of all blood glucose measurements during the intervention

Full Information

First Posted
August 17, 2011
Last Updated
July 31, 2012
Sponsor
Greet Van den Berghe
Collaborators
Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology, Flanders, Belgium, Fund for Scientific Research, Flanders, Belgium
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01420302
Brief Title
LOGIC-Insulin Algorithm-guided Versus Nurse-directed Blood Glucose Control During Critical Illness
Acronym
LOGIC-1
Official Title
LOGIC-Insulin Computerized Algorithm-guided Versus Nurse-directed Blood Glucose Control in Critically Ill Patients: the LOGIC-1 Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2012
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2011 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 2012 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Greet Van den Berghe
Collaborators
Agency for Innovation by Science and Technology, Flanders, Belgium, Fund for Scientific Research, Flanders, Belgium

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The LOGIC-Insulin computerized software algorithm will be compared with a nurse-directed protocol, both targeting a blood glucose level of 80-110 mg/dL, in critically ill patients
Detailed Description
Critical illness typically causes elevated blood glucose concentrations, which have been associated with increased mortality. Strictly normalizing these blood glucose levels by intensive insulin therapy, called tight glycemic control, decreased morbidity and mortality in well-controlled single-center clinical studies. However, multi-center pragmatic trials failed to reproduce those effects, proving that the implementation of tight glycemic control in daily clinical practice is rather difficult. A computerized algorithm, amongst others, may help the nurses in the titration of insulin to reach normal blood glucose levels and to avoid the particularly worrisome hypoglycemia. The LOGIC-1 study is a single blinded randomized controlled trial. On admission patients will be randomly assigned to either tight glycemic control (80-110 mg/dL) by the computerized LOGIC-Insulin 3.0 algorithm or to tight glycemic control (80-110 mg/dL) by the nurse-directed protocol. Written informed consent will be asked from the patient in the case of elective surgery requiring post-operative ICU-admission. Proxy informed consent from the closest family member will be asked when the patient was admitted to the ICU in emergency. As blood glucose control by itself is essential in the management of critical illness, random allocation will be done on admission and written informed consent from the closest family member can be deferred to a maximum of 24 hours after randomization. The patient or family member can at all times withdraw from the trial without impact on his treatment. Allocation will be done in blocks (block size is unknown to the care givers responsible for treatment allocation), stratified into cardiac surgery and other reasons for ICU admission, by central computer randomization. The time window for the study will be 14 days starting from admission to the ICU or when one of the following stop criteria will be met: Withdrawal of the informed consent Patient starts eating or drinking sugar containing liquids Patient is discharged from the ICU (including ICU deaths) Removal of arterial line or central venous line Under the following conditions the study investigator/treating physician will be contacted and, if necessary, patients will be switched from LOGIC-Insulin to nurse-directed blood glucose control: Recurrent severe hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dL) Refractory hyperglycemia Any change in condition that compromises the safety of the patient, as judged by the investigator or treating physician The common strategy for blood glucose control in both groups involves blood glucose measurements from arterial blood by a blood gas analyzer and the administration of insulin through a central line with a syringe pump.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Critical Illness
Keywords
critical illness, intensive care, insulin, glucose, algorithm, blood glucose control

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2, Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
300 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
LOGIC-Insulin
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Blood glucose control (80-110 mg/dL) guided by the LOGIC-Insulin algorithm
Arm Title
Nurse-directed
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Nurse-directed blood glucose control (80-110 mg/dL)
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Nurse directed insulin titration
Other Intervention Name(s)
Active comparator: titration-guidelines supported TGC
Intervention Description
Nurse directed insulin titration to establish glycemic control in the target range of 80-110 mg/dL
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
LOGIC-Insulin
Other Intervention Name(s)
software guided TGC
Intervention Description
Blood glucose control (80-110 mg/dL) guided by the LOGIC-Insulin algorithm
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Glycemic Penalty Index (GPI) during the intervention
Description
Adequacy of reaching and maintaining the target range for blood glucose during the intervention
Time Frame
up to 14 days post-randomization
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Proportion of patients with severe hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dL) during the intervention
Description
Proportion of patients to have had one or more episodes of severe hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dL) during the intervention
Time Frame
up to 14 days post-randomization
Title
Incidence of severe hypoglycemia (<40 mg/dL) during the intervention
Description
Number of severe hypoglycemic values as a fraction of all blood glucose measurements during the intervention
Time Frame
up to 14 days post-randomization
Title
Blood glucose level per treatment group during the intervention
Time Frame
up to 14 days post-randomization
Title
Hyperglycemic index (HGI) during the intervention
Description
Adequacy of reaching and maintaining the target range for blood glucose during the intervention
Time Frame
up to 14 days post-randomization
Title
Daily maximal blood glucose difference during the intervention
Description
Marker of blood glucose variability
Time Frame
up to 14 days post-randomization
Title
Proportion of patients with common hypoglycemia (<60 mg/dL) during the intervention
Description
Proportion of patients to have had one or more episodes of common hypoglycemia during the intervention
Time Frame
up to 14 days post-randomization
Title
Interval between blood glucose measurements during the intervention
Description
Marker of workload
Time Frame
up to 14 days post-randomization
Title
Percentage of time in target zone (80-110 mg/dL) during the intervention
Description
Adequacy of reaching and maintaining the target range for blood glucose during the intervention
Time Frame
up to 14 days post-randomization
Title
Length of stay in ICU
Time Frame
up to 90 days post-randomization
Title
Length of stay in hospital
Time Frame
up to 90 days post-randomization
Title
Hospital mortality
Description
Patients who will have been discharged from hospital before 90 days post-randomization will be regarded as survivors
Time Frame
up to 90 days post-randomization
Title
Incidence of common hypoglycemia (<60 mg/dL) during the intervention
Description
Number of common hypoglycemic values as a fraction of all blood glucose measurements during the intervention
Time Frame
up to 14 days post-randomization

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Aged 18 years or more Admitted to the ICU Already receiving or needing insulin infusion for blood glucose control Exclusion Criteria: Not critically ill (eating, not mechanically ventilated) Pregnant or breastfeeding Previous inclusion into the trial Included in other trial Moribund Diabetes coma No arterial line available
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Dieter Mesotten, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
KU Leuven
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Greet Van den Berghe, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
KU Leuven
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tom Van Herpe, Eng, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
KU Leuven
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bart De Moor, Eng, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
KU Leuven
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Dept Intensive Care Medicine, University Hospitals Leuven
City
Leuven
ZIP/Postal Code
3000
Country
Belgium

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
11794168
Citation
van den Berghe G, Wouters P, Weekers F, Verwaest C, Bruyninckx F, Schetz M, Vlasselaers D, Ferdinande P, Lauwers P, Bouillon R. Intensive insulin therapy in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med. 2001 Nov 8;345(19):1359-67. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa011300.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18302732
Citation
Van Herpe T, De Brabanter J, Beullens M, De Moor B, Van den Berghe G. Glycemic penalty index for adequately assessing and comparing different blood glucose control algorithms. Crit Care. 2008;12(1):R24. doi: 10.1186/cc6800. Epub 2008 Feb 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19449617
Citation
Van Herpe T, De Moor B, Van den Berghe G. Towards closed-loop glycaemic control. Best Pract Res Clin Anaesthesiol. 2009 Mar;23(1):69-80. doi: 10.1016/j.bpa.2008.07.003.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22961576
Citation
Van Herpe T, Mesotten D, Wouters PJ, Herbots J, Voets E, Buyens J, De Moor B, Van den Berghe G. LOGIC-insulin algorithm-guided versus nurse-directed blood glucose control during critical illness: the LOGIC-1 single-center, randomized, controlled clinical trial. Diabetes Care. 2013 Feb;36(2):188-94. doi: 10.2337/dc12-0584. Epub 2012 Sep 6.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
http://www.kuleuven.be/licm/
Description
Leuven Laboratory Intensive Care Medicine

Learn more about this trial

LOGIC-Insulin Algorithm-guided Versus Nurse-directed Blood Glucose Control During Critical Illness

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs