Tenaculum Pain Control Study
Primary Purpose
Cervical Pain, Pelvic Pain
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Intracervical Lidocaine Injection
Topical Lidocaine Gel
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional supportive care trial for Cervical Pain focused on measuring Tenaculum, Pain, Lidocaine
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Generally healthy women
- Age 18 and over
- Indication for endometrial biopsy or IUD placement
Exclusion Criteria:
- Allergy to lidocaine or other local anesthetic
- Pregnancy, known or suspected
- Patients who are premedicated with misoprostol
- Patients with a chronic pain condition for which the patient takes daily pain medication
Sites / Locations
- Oregon Health & Science University
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Intracervical Lidocaine Injection
Topical Lidocaine Gel
Arm Description
Injection of 2 cc of 1% lidocaine solution at the anterior lip of the cervix using a standard 22 gauge spinal needle.
Application of 1cc of 2% lidocaine gel to the anterior lip of the cervix with a Q-tip (this amount of lidocaine will be measured out prior to procedure)
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Tenaculum Pain
The primary outcome was pain at the time of tenaculum placement. Patient asked to pain scale using 100mm Visual Analog Scale (0mm=no pain, 100mm=worst pain of my life) during after tenaculum placement.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Intervention Pain
Pain with the intervention (injection or gel application). Subjects are asked to complete pain scale using a 100mm Visual Analog Scale (0mm=no pain and 100mm=worst pain of my life)
Tenaculum Placement Satisfaction
Satisfaction with overall tenaculum placement procedure. Subjects asked to answer their overall satisfaction with the pain control. Subjects asked to complete 100mm Visual Analog Scale (0mm=not at all satisfied to 100mm=very satisfied)
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01421641
First Posted
August 9, 2011
Last Updated
March 18, 2014
Sponsor
Oregon Health and Science University
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01421641
Brief Title
Tenaculum Pain Control Study
Official Title
The Effect of Intracervical Lidocaine Injection Versus Topical Lidocaine Gel on the Pain Experienced by Patients Undergoing Tenaculum Application to the Cervix at the Time of an Office Gynecologic Procedure
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2012 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Oregon Health and Science University
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effect of an intracervical lidocaine injection versus topical lidocaine gel on the pain experienced by patients undergoing tenaculum application to the cervix during office gynecologic procedures. This study will also evaluate how satisfied women are with the method of pain control used.
The researchers hypothesize that:
There is less pain perceived by patients undergoing placement of a tenaculum on the cervix when a lidocaine injection is used compared to a topical lidocaine gel.
Patients are more satisfied with pain control during the overall experience of undergoing tenaculum placement on the cervix when a lidocaine injection is used compared to a topical lidocaine gel.
Detailed Description
Subjects who have already scheduled an IUD insertion or endometrial biopsy will be asked to join this study assessing two pain control interventions at the time of tenaculum application to the cervix during office gynecologic procedures. Only healthy women ages 18 and over with an indication for endometrial biopsy or IUD placement will be recruited. The participants will be randomized to one of two arms: an intracervical lidocaine injection versus topical lidocaine gel. They will be asked to indicate their level of pain and level of satisfaction using a Visual Analog Scale. The primary outcome, pain with tenaculum placement, and the secondary outcome, satisfaction with the experience of tenaculum placement, will be compared between the study groups.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cervical Pain, Pelvic Pain
Keywords
Tenaculum, Pain, Lidocaine
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
74 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Intracervical Lidocaine Injection
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Injection of 2 cc of 1% lidocaine solution at the anterior lip of the cervix using a standard 22 gauge spinal needle.
Arm Title
Topical Lidocaine Gel
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Application of 1cc of 2% lidocaine gel to the anterior lip of the cervix with a Q-tip (this amount of lidocaine will be measured out prior to procedure)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Intracervical Lidocaine Injection
Other Intervention Name(s)
Lidocaine injection, paracervical blocker
Intervention Description
Injection of 2 cc of 1% lidocaine solution at the anterior lip of the cervix using a standard 22 gauge spinal needle
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Topical Lidocaine Gel
Other Intervention Name(s)
lidocaine gel, numbing gel
Intervention Description
Application of 1cc of 2% lidocaine gel to the anterior lip of the cervix with a Q-tip
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Tenaculum Pain
Description
The primary outcome was pain at the time of tenaculum placement. Patient asked to pain scale using 100mm Visual Analog Scale (0mm=no pain, 100mm=worst pain of my life) during after tenaculum placement.
Time Frame
After tenaculum placement
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Intervention Pain
Description
Pain with the intervention (injection or gel application). Subjects are asked to complete pain scale using a 100mm Visual Analog Scale (0mm=no pain and 100mm=worst pain of my life)
Time Frame
after application of randomized intervention
Title
Tenaculum Placement Satisfaction
Description
Satisfaction with overall tenaculum placement procedure. Subjects asked to answer their overall satisfaction with the pain control. Subjects asked to complete 100mm Visual Analog Scale (0mm=not at all satisfied to 100mm=very satisfied)
Time Frame
After placement of the tenaculum
10. Eligibility
Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Generally healthy women
Age 18 and over
Indication for endometrial biopsy or IUD placement
Exclusion Criteria:
Allergy to lidocaine or other local anesthetic
Pregnancy, known or suspected
Patients who are premedicated with misoprostol
Patients with a chronic pain condition for which the patient takes daily pain medication
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Paula Bednarek, MD MPH
Organizational Affiliation
Oregon Health and Science University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Oregon Health & Science University
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97239
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Tenaculum Pain Control Study
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs