search
Back to results

Flu Vaccine Study in Neuromuscular Patients 2011

Primary Purpose

Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy, Spinal Muscular Atrophy, Congenital Muscular Dystrophy

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
2011-2012 seasonal flu vaccine Subcutaneous
2011-2012 seasonal flu vaccine Intramuscular
Sponsored by
Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy focused on measuring DMD, SMA, CMD, flu vaccine

Eligibility Criteria

3 Years - 35 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Non-ambulatory;
  • Quadriceps muscle strength of MRC (Medical Research Council Scale) grade 3 or below
  • Any subject who is between 3 to 8 years of age must have received at least two doses of influenza vaccine last season or at least one dose tow or more years ago.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subject must not have a history of severe reactions following previous immunization with influenza vaccine.
  • Subject must not have previously received a 2011-2012 influenza vaccine.
  • Subject must not have a history of Guillain-Barre syndrome.
  • Subject must not have received a live viral vaccine (i.e., MMR, varicella) within 28 days prior to receipt of the study vaccine.
  • Subject must not have any condition that the investigator believes would render vaccination unsafe or interfere with successful completion of the study.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Subcutaneous

    Intramuscular

    Arm Description

    0.5 mL of Fluzone (2011-2012 Northern Hemisphere formulation) influenza vaccine administered via subcutaneous route once

    0.5 mL of Fluzone (2011-2012 Northern Hemisphere formulation) influenza vaccine administered via intramuscular route once

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Geometric Mean Titer Ratio for Each Vaccine Strain
    Serum HI antibody titers for each vaccine strain immediately prior to study vaccine receipt and 21-28 days after study vaccine receipt

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Full Information

    First Posted
    August 22, 2011
    Last Updated
    October 14, 2020
    Sponsor
    Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT01422200
    Brief Title
    Flu Vaccine Study in Neuromuscular Patients 2011
    Official Title
    Comparison of the Immunogenicity of Intramuscular Versus Subcutaneous Administration of Trivalent Inactivated Influenza Vaccine in Individuals With Neuromuscular Diseases
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    September 2020
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    August 2011 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    December 2011 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    May 2012 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    The purpose of the study is to compare the immune response of two different injection methods (Intramuscular V.S. Subcutaneous) of the 2011-2012 seasonal Influenza (Flu) vaccine among patients with neuromuscular conditions who have significant muscle degeneration. This research study hypothesizes that the subcutaneous route of vaccine administration, as compared to the intramuscular route, may confer at least comparable, or possibly better, immunogenicity. At least 30 individuals followed by the CCHMC Neuromuscular Comprehensive Care Center will be recruited to participate in this study lasting approximately one to two months with two clinic visits and one follow-up telephone call. Immunogenicity will be assessed by comparing hemagglutination inhibition (HI) antibody titers obtained pre- and post-vaccination.
    Detailed Description
    Individuals with neuromuscular diseases are more prone to influenza-related morbidity. Vaccination is the most effective measure to reduce the influenza disease burden. In the United States, the recommended route of administration for the inactivated influenza vaccine is intramuscular. In other countries, the subcutaneous, deep subcutaneous, and intramuscular routes are all considered acceptable for influenza vaccine administration. The United States CDC states that subcutaneous influenza vaccine doses, provided they are age-appropriate, may be counted as valid. Those with neuromuscular diseases have muscle fibrosis that may potentially make intramuscular vaccines more effective. Those with Duchenne muscular dystrophy receive systemic corticosteroids to reduce inflammation. Corticosteroids may suppress antibody responses to vaccines. The goal of this research study is to evaluate the immunogenicity and safety of intramuscular and subcutaneous administration of inactivated influenza vaccine in individuals with neuromuscular diseases. This is a single site, open-label, randomized study. At the first visit, a blood sample was collected prior to vaccination. Each subject received either an intramuscular or subcutaneous vaccine administered in the anterolateral aspect of the thigh. Within 30 minutes of vaccination, subjects rated pain at the injection site using a numeric pain scale (0-10). Subjects and their caregivers were also asked to record local and systemic adverse events on diary sheets from day 0 to day 4 after vaccination. Subjects were instructed to notify the study staff by telephone should they develop any serious adverse reactions following vaccination. At a second study visit approximately 28 days later, a repeat blood sample was obtained. The blood samples obtained pre-vaccination and also at day 28 were tested for hemagglutination inhibition (HI) titers to the three influenza vaccine strains. rovider's office. The geometric mean titer ratios for each of the three vaccine strains were calculated as the ratios of postvaccination to prevaccination titers at geometric mean scale.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Duchenne Muscular Dystrophy, Spinal Muscular Atrophy, Congenital Muscular Dystrophy
    Keywords
    DMD, SMA, CMD, flu vaccine

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Prevention
    Study Phase
    Phase 4
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    Outcomes Assessor
    Masking Description
    Participant, care provider, and investigator are not masked. The outcomes assessor (personnel determining the HI titers) is masked.
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    22 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Subcutaneous
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    0.5 mL of Fluzone (2011-2012 Northern Hemisphere formulation) influenza vaccine administered via subcutaneous route once
    Arm Title
    Intramuscular
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    0.5 mL of Fluzone (2011-2012 Northern Hemisphere formulation) influenza vaccine administered via intramuscular route once
    Intervention Type
    Biological
    Intervention Name(s)
    2011-2012 seasonal flu vaccine Subcutaneous
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    fluzone
    Intervention Type
    Biological
    Intervention Name(s)
    2011-2012 seasonal flu vaccine Intramuscular
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    fluzone
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Geometric Mean Titer Ratio for Each Vaccine Strain
    Description
    Serum HI antibody titers for each vaccine strain immediately prior to study vaccine receipt and 21-28 days after study vaccine receipt
    Time Frame
    immediately before vaccination and 21-28 days after vaccination
    Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
    Title
    Safety: Summary of Local and Systemic Reactogenicity Symptoms
    Description
    For the 4 days following receipt of study vaccine (days 0 to 4), the following local reactions will be assessed: pain, redness, and swelling. The following systemic reactions will also be assessed: body ache, weakness, irritability, headache, and cough.
    Time Frame
    4 days following receipt of study vaccine

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    3 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    35 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Non-ambulatory; Quadriceps muscle strength of MRC (Medical Research Council Scale) grade 3 or below Any subject who is between 3 to 8 years of age must have received at least two doses of influenza vaccine last season or at least one dose tow or more years ago. Exclusion Criteria: Subject must not have a history of severe reactions following previous immunization with influenza vaccine. Subject must not have previously received a 2011-2012 influenza vaccine. Subject must not have a history of Guillain-Barre syndrome. Subject must not have received a live viral vaccine (i.e., MMR, varicella) within 28 days prior to receipt of the study vaccine. Subject must not have any condition that the investigator believes would render vaccination unsafe or interfere with successful completion of the study.
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Brenda Wong, MD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Children's Hospital Medical Center, Cincinnati
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Learn more about this trial

    Flu Vaccine Study in Neuromuscular Patients 2011

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs