search
Back to results

Clinical Investigation of AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +3.0 D Multifocal Toric Intraocular Lens (IOL)

Primary Purpose

Cataracts

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +3.0 D Multifocal Toric IOL
AcrySof® ReSTOR® Multifocal IOL Model SA60D3
Sponsored by
Alcon Research
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Cataracts focused on measuring Cataract surgery, Intraocular lens

Eligibility Criteria

21 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with bilateral cataracts;
  • Able to comprehend and sign a statement of informed consent;
  • Calculated lens power and astigmatism within the available range;
  • Willing and able to complete all required postoperative visits;
  • Planned cataract removal by phacoemulsification;
  • Potential postoperative visual acuity of 0.2 logMAR or better in both eyes;
  • Preoperative astigmatism in both operative eyes as described in the clinical protocol; Note: Corneal incisions made to reduce astigmatism will not be allowed during the course of the study.
  • Clear intraocular media other than cataract in study eyes;
  • Preoperative Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) worse than 0.2 logMAR in each eye;
  • Pupil size greater than or equal to 6 mm after dilation;
  • Able to undergo second eye surgery within 30 days of the first eye surgery;
  • Other protocol-specified inclusion criteria may apply.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Significant irregular corneal aberration as demonstrated by corneal topography;
  • Keratopathy/Kerectasia - any corneal abnormality, other than regular corneal astigmatism;
  • Any inflammation or edema (swelling) of the cornea;
  • Diagnosed degenerative visual disorders (e.g. macular degeneration or other retinal disorders) that are predicted (by subjective assessment of the retina) to cause future acuity losses to a level worse than 0.2 logMAR;
  • Reasonably expected to require a secondary surgical intervention at any time during the study (other than YAG capsulotomy);
  • Previous corneal refractive surgery;
  • Amblyopia;
  • Clinically severe corneal dystrophy (e.g., epithelial, stromal, or endothelial dystrophy);
  • Diabetic retinopathy;
  • Extremely shallow anterior chamber, not due to swollen cataract;
  • Microphthalmos;
  • Previous retinal detachment;
  • Previous corneal transplant;
  • Recurrent severe anterior or posterior segment inflammation of unknown etiology;
  • Rubella or traumatic cataract;
  • Iris neovascularization;
  • Glaucoma (uncontrolled or controlled with medication);
  • Aniridia;
  • Optic nerve atrophy;
  • Pregnancy;
  • Current participation in another investigational drug or device study that may confound the results of this investigation;
  • Other planned ocular surgery procedures, including, but not limited to LASIK, astigmatic keratotomy and limbal relaxing incisions, for the duration of the study;
  • Other protocol-specified exclusion criteria may apply.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    ReSTOR Toric IOL

    ReSTOR IOL

    Arm Description

    AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +3.0 D Multifocal Toric IOL, model determined by preoperative keratometric astigmatism, bilateral implantation

    AcrySof® ReSTOR® Multifocal IOL Model SA60D3, bilateral implantation

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Mean Monocular Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) at Fixed Distance at Visit 5
    Visual acuity (VA) was measured monocularly (each eye separately) without visual correction using a 100% contrast ETDRS (Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study) chart positioned 4 meters (m) from the participant under well-lit conditions. +0.25 diopter (D) spherical power was applied to correct for optical infinity. VA was measured in logMAR (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution), with 0.1 logMAR increment corresponding to 5 letters, or 1 line, on an ETDRS chart. A lower numeric value represents better visual acuity. This analysis was prespecified for the first operative eye.
    Mean Monocular Uncorrected Near Visual Acuity (UCNVA) at Fixed Distance at Visit 5
    VA was measured monocularly without visual correction using a hand-held ETDRS chart at a fixed distance that differed by lens model implanted. The logMAR ETDRS near visual acuity chart was designed for use at 40 cm; results obtained at other distances were converted to reflect the change in apparent letter size that results from the change in distance. VA was measured in logMAR, with 0.1 logMAR increment corresponding to 5 letters, or 1 line, on an ETDRS chart. A lower numeric value represents better visual acuity. This analysis was prespecified for the first operative eye.
    Rate of Actual and Potential Secondary Surgical Interventions (SSIs) Related to the Optical Properties of the IOL for First and Second Operative Eyes Separately at Visit 5
    The rate of actual and potential secondary surgical interventions (SSIs) related to the optical properties of the IOL was estimated. If an ocular surgical intervention was performed, it qualified as an actual SSI; however; if the participant met the protocol-specified criteria that would warrant an SSI, but didn't actually undergo the SSI, it qualified as a potential SSI. Rate is presented as percentage of participants.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Rate of Severe Visual Disturbances/Distortions Reported on the Assessment of Photic Phenomena & Lens EffectS (APPLES) Questionnaire at Visit 5
    Visual disturbances/distortions were reported by the participant on the Assessment of Photic Phenomena and Lens EffectS (APPLES) questionnaire, a Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) questionnaire intended to evaluate 10 distinct visual phenomena associated with cataract extraction and IOL implantation. The first 20 questions addressed both the frequency and severity of the phenomena using a 4-point categorical scale ranging from "never" to "always" (frequency) or "none" to "severe" (severity). The final (21st) question indicated whether the participant answered the questions based on experiences with or without glasses. The participant completed the assessment as a retrospective analysis of the previous week. Rate is presented as the percentage of participants with severity score "severe" for the visual phenomenon.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    August 25, 2011
    Last Updated
    May 31, 2018
    Sponsor
    Alcon Research
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT01424189
    Brief Title
    Clinical Investigation of AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +3.0 D Multifocal Toric Intraocular Lens (IOL)
    Official Title
    Clinical Investigation of AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® Multifocal Toric Intraocular Lens Models SND1T3/ SND1T4/ SND1T5/ SND1T6
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    May 2018
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    July 2011 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    January 2013 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    January 2013 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    Alcon Research

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of an investigational multifocal toric intraocular lens (IOL) compared to an FDA-approved multifocal IOL.
    Detailed Description
    Participants 21 years and older within the targeted astigmatism range and in need of cataract extraction in both eyes were consented and randomized in a 2:1 ratio at each investigative site to receive either the AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® Multifocal Toric IOL or the control AcrySof® ReSTOR® Multifocal IOL in both eyes. Each participant completed a preoperative examination of both eyes, implantation of the IOL at the operative visit for each eye, and up to 8 postoperative visits, with monocular testing at Day 1-2, Day 7-14, and Day 30-60 and binocular testing at Day 120-180 and Day 340-420/Visit 5 following the second implantation. The eye with the greater amount of astigmatism was implanted first (first operative eye). The second eye implant was intended to occur within 30 days after the first eye implant but not prior to 7 days after the first eye implant. Both eyes needed to qualify under inclusion/exclusion criteria at the preoperative visit. If the first eye was excluded during surgery, the second eye was not eligible. If the second eye was excluded during surgery, only the first eye was followed.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Cataracts
    Keywords
    Cataract surgery, Intraocular lens

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    Non-Randomized
    Enrollment
    677 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    ReSTOR Toric IOL
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +3.0 D Multifocal Toric IOL, model determined by preoperative keratometric astigmatism, bilateral implantation
    Arm Title
    ReSTOR IOL
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    AcrySof® ReSTOR® Multifocal IOL Model SA60D3, bilateral implantation
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +3.0 D Multifocal Toric IOL
    Other Intervention Name(s)
    Models SND1T3, SND1T4, SND1T5, SND1T6
    Intervention Description
    Multifocal IOL with extended secondary focal point and astigmatism correction implanted for long-term use over the lifetime of the cataract patient
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    AcrySof® ReSTOR® Multifocal IOL Model SA60D3
    Intervention Description
    Multifocal IOL with extended secondary focal point implanted for long-term use over the lifetime of the cataract patient
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Mean Monocular Uncorrected Distance Visual Acuity (UCDVA) at Fixed Distance at Visit 5
    Description
    Visual acuity (VA) was measured monocularly (each eye separately) without visual correction using a 100% contrast ETDRS (Early Treatment of Diabetic Retinopathy Study) chart positioned 4 meters (m) from the participant under well-lit conditions. +0.25 diopter (D) spherical power was applied to correct for optical infinity. VA was measured in logMAR (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution), with 0.1 logMAR increment corresponding to 5 letters, or 1 line, on an ETDRS chart. A lower numeric value represents better visual acuity. This analysis was prespecified for the first operative eye.
    Time Frame
    Month 12 from second eye implantation
    Title
    Mean Monocular Uncorrected Near Visual Acuity (UCNVA) at Fixed Distance at Visit 5
    Description
    VA was measured monocularly without visual correction using a hand-held ETDRS chart at a fixed distance that differed by lens model implanted. The logMAR ETDRS near visual acuity chart was designed for use at 40 cm; results obtained at other distances were converted to reflect the change in apparent letter size that results from the change in distance. VA was measured in logMAR, with 0.1 logMAR increment corresponding to 5 letters, or 1 line, on an ETDRS chart. A lower numeric value represents better visual acuity. This analysis was prespecified for the first operative eye.
    Time Frame
    Month 12 from second eye implantation
    Title
    Rate of Actual and Potential Secondary Surgical Interventions (SSIs) Related to the Optical Properties of the IOL for First and Second Operative Eyes Separately at Visit 5
    Description
    The rate of actual and potential secondary surgical interventions (SSIs) related to the optical properties of the IOL was estimated. If an ocular surgical intervention was performed, it qualified as an actual SSI; however; if the participant met the protocol-specified criteria that would warrant an SSI, but didn't actually undergo the SSI, it qualified as a potential SSI. Rate is presented as percentage of participants.
    Time Frame
    Month 12 from second eye implantation
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Rate of Severe Visual Disturbances/Distortions Reported on the Assessment of Photic Phenomena & Lens EffectS (APPLES) Questionnaire at Visit 5
    Description
    Visual disturbances/distortions were reported by the participant on the Assessment of Photic Phenomena and Lens EffectS (APPLES) questionnaire, a Patient Reported Outcome (PRO) questionnaire intended to evaluate 10 distinct visual phenomena associated with cataract extraction and IOL implantation. The first 20 questions addressed both the frequency and severity of the phenomena using a 4-point categorical scale ranging from "never" to "always" (frequency) or "none" to "severe" (severity). The final (21st) question indicated whether the participant answered the questions based on experiences with or without glasses. The participant completed the assessment as a retrospective analysis of the previous week. Rate is presented as the percentage of participants with severity score "severe" for the visual phenomenon.
    Time Frame
    Month 12 from second eye implantation

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    21 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Diagnosed with bilateral cataracts; Able to comprehend and sign a statement of informed consent; Calculated lens power and astigmatism within the available range; Willing and able to complete all required postoperative visits; Planned cataract removal by phacoemulsification; Potential postoperative visual acuity of 0.2 logMAR or better in both eyes; Preoperative astigmatism in both operative eyes as described in the clinical protocol; Note: Corneal incisions made to reduce astigmatism will not be allowed during the course of the study. Clear intraocular media other than cataract in study eyes; Preoperative Best Corrected Distance Visual Acuity (BCDVA) worse than 0.2 logMAR in each eye; Pupil size greater than or equal to 6 mm after dilation; Able to undergo second eye surgery within 30 days of the first eye surgery; Other protocol-specified inclusion criteria may apply. Exclusion Criteria: Significant irregular corneal aberration as demonstrated by corneal topography; Keratopathy/Kerectasia - any corneal abnormality, other than regular corneal astigmatism; Any inflammation or edema (swelling) of the cornea; Diagnosed degenerative visual disorders (e.g. macular degeneration or other retinal disorders) that are predicted (by subjective assessment of the retina) to cause future acuity losses to a level worse than 0.2 logMAR; Reasonably expected to require a secondary surgical intervention at any time during the study (other than YAG capsulotomy); Previous corneal refractive surgery; Amblyopia; Clinically severe corneal dystrophy (e.g., epithelial, stromal, or endothelial dystrophy); Diabetic retinopathy; Extremely shallow anterior chamber, not due to swollen cataract; Microphthalmos; Previous retinal detachment; Previous corneal transplant; Recurrent severe anterior or posterior segment inflammation of unknown etiology; Rubella or traumatic cataract; Iris neovascularization; Glaucoma (uncontrolled or controlled with medication); Aniridia; Optic nerve atrophy; Pregnancy; Current participation in another investigational drug or device study that may confound the results of this investigation; Other planned ocular surgery procedures, including, but not limited to LASIK, astigmatic keratotomy and limbal relaxing incisions, for the duration of the study; Other protocol-specified exclusion criteria may apply.
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Expert Clinical Project Lead, GCRA, Surgical
    Organizational Affiliation
    Alcon Research
    Official's Role
    Study Director

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    32600261
    Citation
    Williams JR, Kim HW, Crespi CM. Modeling observations with a detection limit using a truncated normal distribution with censoring. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Jun 29;20(1):170. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01032-9.
    Results Reference
    derived

    Learn more about this trial

    Clinical Investigation of AcrySof® IQ ReSTOR® +3.0 D Multifocal Toric Intraocular Lens (IOL)

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs