A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of MEDI-546 in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Primary Purpose
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Anifrolumab 300 mg
Anifrolumab 1000 mg
Placebo
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus focused on measuring MEDI-546, Anifrolumab, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Fulfills at least 4 of the 11 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) including a positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) greater than or equal to 1:80 or elevated anti-double-stranded DNA or anti-Smith antibody at screening
- Pediatric or adult SLE with chronic disease activity for greater than or equal to 24 weeks
- Weight greater than or equal to 40 kg
- Currently receiving stable dose of oral prednisone (or equivalent) less than or equal to 40 mg/day and/or antimalarials/immunosuppressives
- Active moderate to severe SLE disease based on SLE disease activity score (SLEDAI) and British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Index (BILAG) and Physicians Global Assessment
- No evidence of cervical malignancy on Pap smear within 2 years of randomization
- Female participants must be willing to avoid pregnancy
- Negative tuberculosis (TB) test or newly positive TB test due to latent TB for which treatment must be initiated at or before randomization.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Active severe SLE-driven renal disease or unstable renal disease prior to screening
- Active severe or unstable neuropsychiatric SLE
- Clinically significant active infection including ongoing and chronic infections
- History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
- Confirmed Positive tests for hepatitis B or positive test for hepatitis C
- History of severe herpes infection such as herpes encephalitis, ophthalmic herpes, disseminated herpes
- Live or attenuated vaccine within 4 weeks prior to screening
- Participants with significant hematologic abnormalities.
Sites / Locations
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
- Research Site
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
Anifrolumab (MEDI-546) 300 mg
Anifrolumab (MEDI-546) 1000 mg
Matching Placebo
Arm Description
Participants will receive 300 milligram (mg) anifrolumab as an intravenous infusion every 4 weeks for 48 weeks.
Participants will receive 1000 mg anifrolumab as an intravenous infusion every 4 weeks for 48 weeks.
Participants will receive placebo matched to anifrolumab intravenous (IV) infusion every 4 weeks for 48 weeks.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Percentage of Participants Achieving an Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index [SRI (4)] Response With Oral Corticosteroids (OCS) Tapering at Day 169
An SRI (4) responder defined as a participant who had 1) a reduction in baseline Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score of greater than or equal to (>=) 4 points; 2) no worsening of disease from baseline as measured by the Physician Global Assessment (MDGA) (worsening was defined as an increase of >= 0.3 from baseline on a 0 to 3.0 visual analog scale); and 3) no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 (BILAG-2004) Index 'A' organ system score and no more than one new or worsening BILAG-2004 Index 'B' organ system score. OCS tapering requires a sustained reduction of OCS from Day 85 through Day 169 [less than 10 milligram per day (mg/day) and less or equal to the dose received on Day 1]. SRI was analyzed by a logistic regression model.
Percentage of Type I Interferon (IFN) Test High Participants Achieving an Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (SRI) (4) Response With Oral Corticosteroids (OCS) Tapering at Day 169
Type I IFN signature in whole blood assessed by using a 4-gene diagnostic test. The blood samples collected were to be used to prospectively identify participants as IFN test-high or test-low. The results of this test were used to stratify participants. An SRI (4) Responder was defined as a participant who had 1) a reduction in baseline SLEDAI-2K disease activity score of >= 4 points; 2) no worsening of disease from baseline as measured by the Physician Global Assessment (MDGA) (worsening was defined as an increase of >= 0.3 from baseline on a 0 to 3.0 visual analog scale); and 3) no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 (BILAG-2004) Index A organ system score and no more than one new or worsening BILAG-2004 Index B organ system score. OCS tapering requires a sustained reduction of OCS from Day 85 through Day 169 [less than 10 mg/day and less or equal to the dose received on Day 1]. SRI was analyzed by a logistic regression model.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Percentage of Participants Achieving an Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index [SRI (4)] Response With Oral Corticosteroids (OCS) Tapering at Day 365
An SRI (4) Responder was defined as a participant who had 1) a reduction in baseline SLEDAI-2K disease activity score of >= 4 points; 2) no worsening of disease from baseline as measured by the MDGA (worsening was defined as an increase of >= 0.3 from baseline on a 0 to 3.0 visual analog scale); and 3) no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 (BILAG-2004) Index A organ system score and no more than one new or worsening BILAG-2004 Index B organ system score. OCS tapering requires a sustained reduction of OCS from Day 281 through Day 365 (less than 10 mg/day and less or equal to the dose received on Day 1). SRI was analyzed by a logistic regression model.
Percentage of Participants on Oral Corticosteroids (OCS) >=10 mg/Day of Prednisone or Equivalent at Baseline Who Were Able to Taper to Less Than or Equal to (<=) 7.5 mg/Day at Day 365
Participants on OCS >=10 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent at baseline who were able to taper to <= 7.5 mg/day at Day 365 were evaluated.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. A serious AE (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial/prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly (in offspring of participant). AEs may be treatment emergent (TE) [that is, occurring after initial receipt of investigational product] or non-TE. An AESI is one of scientific and medical concern specific to understanding biologics and requires close monitoring and rapid communication by investigator to sponsor.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities in Investigations Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
Any medically significant change in laboratory evaluations were recorded as Treatment emergent adverse events.
Number of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Vital sign parameters are temperature, blood pressure, respiratory rate, heart rate and weight. Vital signs abnormalities were reported as TEAEs.
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Any medically significant changes from the screening ECG was recorded as TEAEs. An abnormal ECG findings such as QT prolonged were reported as treatment emergent adverse events.
Percentage of SLE Participants With Positive Anti-drug Antibody (ADA)
Anti-drug antibody responses to anifrolumab in serum were evaluated.
Neutralization Ratio of 21-Gene Type I Interferon (IFN) Signature for Participants With Positive Baseline Pharmacodynamic (PD) Gene Signature
The PD positive and negative gene signature was determined by comparing the expression of type I IFN-inducible genes in a 21-gene panel in study participants relative to pooled normal blood collected from healthy participants.
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Anifrolumab at Day 1, 169 and 337
Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was defined as the peak plasma level of anifrolumab, derived from plasma concentration -time data.
Accumulation Ratio of Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax,AR) of Anifrolumab
Accumulation ratio for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax,AR) of anifrolumab after multiple administration at Day 169 and 337 was calculated.
Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Anifrolumab at Day 29, 169 and 365
Trough concentration (Ctrough) of anifrolumab at Day 29, 169 and 365 were calculated.
Accumulation Ratio of Trough Concentration (Ctrough,AR) of Anifrolumab at Day 169 and 365
Accumulation ratio for trough concentration (Ctrough,AR) of anifrolumab after multiple administration at Day 169 and 365 was calculated.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01438489
Brief Title
A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of MEDI-546 in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Official Title
A Phase 2, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of MEDI-546 in Subjects With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
August 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2012 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
April 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 2015 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
MedImmune LLC
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of MEDI-546 compared to placebo in subjects with chronic, moderately-to-severely active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) with an inadequate response to standard of care treatment for SLE.
Detailed Description
This is a Phase 2, multinational, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo controlled, parallel-group study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 2 intravenous (IV) treatment regimens in adult participants with chronic, moderately-to-severely active SLE with an inadequate response to SOC SLE. The investigational product (anifrolumab or placebo) will be administered as a fixed dose every 4 weeks (28 days) for a total of 13 doses.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
Keywords
MEDI-546, Anifrolumab, Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
626 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Anifrolumab (MEDI-546) 300 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive 300 milligram (mg) anifrolumab as an intravenous infusion every 4 weeks for 48 weeks.
Arm Title
Anifrolumab (MEDI-546) 1000 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive 1000 mg anifrolumab as an intravenous infusion every 4 weeks for 48 weeks.
Arm Title
Matching Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Participants will receive placebo matched to anifrolumab intravenous (IV) infusion every 4 weeks for 48 weeks.
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Anifrolumab 300 mg
Other Intervention Name(s)
MEDI-546
Intervention Description
Participants will receive 300 milligram (mg) anifrolumab as an intravenous infusion every 4 weeks for 48 weeks.
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Anifrolumab 1000 mg
Other Intervention Name(s)
MEDI-546
Intervention Description
Participants will receive 1000 mg anifrolumab as an intravenous infusion every 4 weeks for 48 weeks.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Participants will receive placebo matched to anifrolumab intravenous (IV) infusion every 4 weeks for 48 weeks.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving an Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index [SRI (4)] Response With Oral Corticosteroids (OCS) Tapering at Day 169
Description
An SRI (4) responder defined as a participant who had 1) a reduction in baseline Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2K) score of greater than or equal to (>=) 4 points; 2) no worsening of disease from baseline as measured by the Physician Global Assessment (MDGA) (worsening was defined as an increase of >= 0.3 from baseline on a 0 to 3.0 visual analog scale); and 3) no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 (BILAG-2004) Index 'A' organ system score and no more than one new or worsening BILAG-2004 Index 'B' organ system score. OCS tapering requires a sustained reduction of OCS from Day 85 through Day 169 [less than 10 milligram per day (mg/day) and less or equal to the dose received on Day 1]. SRI was analyzed by a logistic regression model.
Time Frame
Day 169
Title
Percentage of Type I Interferon (IFN) Test High Participants Achieving an Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Responder Index (SRI) (4) Response With Oral Corticosteroids (OCS) Tapering at Day 169
Description
Type I IFN signature in whole blood assessed by using a 4-gene diagnostic test. The blood samples collected were to be used to prospectively identify participants as IFN test-high or test-low. The results of this test were used to stratify participants. An SRI (4) Responder was defined as a participant who had 1) a reduction in baseline SLEDAI-2K disease activity score of >= 4 points; 2) no worsening of disease from baseline as measured by the Physician Global Assessment (MDGA) (worsening was defined as an increase of >= 0.3 from baseline on a 0 to 3.0 visual analog scale); and 3) no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 (BILAG-2004) Index A organ system score and no more than one new or worsening BILAG-2004 Index B organ system score. OCS tapering requires a sustained reduction of OCS from Day 85 through Day 169 [less than 10 mg/day and less or equal to the dose received on Day 1]. SRI was analyzed by a logistic regression model.
Time Frame
Day 169
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving an Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) Responder Index [SRI (4)] Response With Oral Corticosteroids (OCS) Tapering at Day 365
Description
An SRI (4) Responder was defined as a participant who had 1) a reduction in baseline SLEDAI-2K disease activity score of >= 4 points; 2) no worsening of disease from baseline as measured by the MDGA (worsening was defined as an increase of >= 0.3 from baseline on a 0 to 3.0 visual analog scale); and 3) no new British Isles Lupus Assessment Group 2004 (BILAG-2004) Index A organ system score and no more than one new or worsening BILAG-2004 Index B organ system score. OCS tapering requires a sustained reduction of OCS from Day 281 through Day 365 (less than 10 mg/day and less or equal to the dose received on Day 1). SRI was analyzed by a logistic regression model.
Time Frame
Day 365
Title
Percentage of Participants on Oral Corticosteroids (OCS) >=10 mg/Day of Prednisone or Equivalent at Baseline Who Were Able to Taper to Less Than or Equal to (<=) 7.5 mg/Day at Day 365
Description
Participants on OCS >=10 mg/day of prednisone or equivalent at baseline who were able to taper to <= 7.5 mg/day at Day 365 were evaluated.
Time Frame
Day 365
Title
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESIs) and Treatment-Emergent Serious Adverse Events (TESAEs)
Description
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a study participant administered a pharmaceutical product and which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with treatment. A serious AE (SAE) was an AE resulting in any of following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial/prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly (in offspring of participant). AEs may be treatment emergent (TE) [that is, occurring after initial receipt of investigational product] or non-TE. An AESI is one of scientific and medical concern specific to understanding biologics and requires close monitoring and rapid communication by investigator to sponsor.
Time Frame
Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 422 (End of Study)
Title
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities in Investigations Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events
Description
Any medically significant change in laboratory evaluations were recorded as Treatment emergent adverse events.
Time Frame
Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 422 (End of Study)
Title
Number of Participants With Vital Signs Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Description
Vital sign parameters are temperature, blood pressure, respiratory rate, heart rate and weight. Vital signs abnormalities were reported as TEAEs.
Time Frame
Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 422 (End of Study)
Title
Number of Participants With Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities Reported as Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Description
Any medically significant changes from the screening ECG was recorded as TEAEs. An abnormal ECG findings such as QT prolonged were reported as treatment emergent adverse events.
Time Frame
Day 1 (Baseline) to Day 422 (End of Study)
Title
Percentage of SLE Participants With Positive Anti-drug Antibody (ADA)
Description
Anti-drug antibody responses to anifrolumab in serum were evaluated.
Time Frame
Days 1, 85, 141, 169, 253, 337 (Treatment Phase), 365, 396, and 422 (Follow-up Period)
Title
Neutralization Ratio of 21-Gene Type I Interferon (IFN) Signature for Participants With Positive Baseline Pharmacodynamic (PD) Gene Signature
Description
The PD positive and negative gene signature was determined by comparing the expression of type I IFN-inducible genes in a 21-gene panel in study participants relative to pooled normal blood collected from healthy participants.
Time Frame
Days 29, 85, 141, 169, 253, 337 (treatment phase), on Days 365, 396, and 422 (follow up period)
Title
Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Anifrolumab at Day 1, 169 and 337
Description
Maximum plasma concentration (Cmax) was defined as the peak plasma level of anifrolumab, derived from plasma concentration -time data.
Time Frame
Pre-infusion and 15 minutes post-infusion on Day 1, 169 and 337
Title
Accumulation Ratio of Maximum Observed Plasma Concentration (Cmax,AR) of Anifrolumab
Description
Accumulation ratio for maximum plasma concentration (Cmax,AR) of anifrolumab after multiple administration at Day 169 and 337 was calculated.
Time Frame
Pre-infusion and 15 minutes post-infusion on Day 169 and 337
Title
Trough Concentration (Ctrough) of Anifrolumab at Day 29, 169 and 365
Description
Trough concentration (Ctrough) of anifrolumab at Day 29, 169 and 365 were calculated.
Time Frame
Pre-infusion and 15 minutes post-infusion on Day 29, 169 and 365
Title
Accumulation Ratio of Trough Concentration (Ctrough,AR) of Anifrolumab at Day 169 and 365
Description
Accumulation ratio for trough concentration (Ctrough,AR) of anifrolumab after multiple administration at Day 169 and 365 was calculated.
Time Frame
Pre-infusion and 15 minutes post-infusion on Day 169 and 365
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Fulfills at least 4 of the 11 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) including a positive antinuclear antibody (ANA) greater than or equal to 1:80 or elevated anti-double-stranded DNA or anti-Smith antibody at screening
Pediatric or adult SLE with chronic disease activity for greater than or equal to 24 weeks
Weight greater than or equal to 40 kg
Currently receiving stable dose of oral prednisone (or equivalent) less than or equal to 40 mg/day and/or antimalarials/immunosuppressives
Active moderate to severe SLE disease based on SLE disease activity score (SLEDAI) and British Isles Lupus Assessment Group Index (BILAG) and Physicians Global Assessment
No evidence of cervical malignancy on Pap smear within 2 years of randomization
Female participants must be willing to avoid pregnancy
Negative tuberculosis (TB) test or newly positive TB test due to latent TB for which treatment must be initiated at or before randomization.
Exclusion Criteria:
Active severe SLE-driven renal disease or unstable renal disease prior to screening
Active severe or unstable neuropsychiatric SLE
Clinically significant active infection including ongoing and chronic infections
History of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)
Confirmed Positive tests for hepatitis B or positive test for hepatitis C
History of severe herpes infection such as herpes encephalitis, ophthalmic herpes, disseminated herpes
Live or attenuated vaccine within 4 weeks prior to screening
Participants with significant hematologic abnormalities.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Warren Greth, MD
Organizational Affiliation
MedImmune LLC
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
La Jolla
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
La Palma
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Long Beach
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Palm Desert
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
San Leandro
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Upland
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Ocala
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Palm Harbor
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Decatur
State/Province
Georgia
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Stockbridge
State/Province
Georgia
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Idaho Falls
State/Province
Idaho
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Las Cruces
State/Province
New Mexico
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
New York
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Raleigh
State/Province
North Carolina
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Edmond
State/Province
Oklahoma
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Tulsa
State/Province
Oklahoma
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Memphis
State/Province
Tennessee
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Spokane
State/Province
Washington
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Rio de Janeiro
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Sao Paulo
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Plovdiv
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Sofia
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Barranquilla
Country
Colombia
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Bogota
Country
Colombia
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Bucaramanga
Country
Colombia
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Chia
Country
Colombia
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Medellin
Country
Colombia
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Brno
Country
Czech Republic
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Praha 2
Country
Czech Republic
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Uherske Hradiste
Country
Czech Republic
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Budapest
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Debrecen
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Dantoli-Nagpur
Country
India
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Hyderabad
Country
India
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Mumbai
Country
India
Facility Name
Research Site
City
New Delhi
Country
India
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Pune
Country
India
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Secunderabad
Country
India
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Gwangjin-gu
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Gwangju
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Seodaemun-gu
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Suwon-si
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Guadalajara
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Leon
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Mexico
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Toluca
Country
Mexico
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Arequipa
Country
Peru
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Lima
Country
Peru
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Bialystok
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Bydgoszcz
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Krakow
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Nadarzyn
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Poznan
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Brasov
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Iasi
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Targu Mures
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Chiayi
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Kaohsiung
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Taichung
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Taipei
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Donetsk
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Kyiv
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Lugansk
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Lviv
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Ternopil
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Vinnitsya
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Vinnytsia
Country
Ukraine
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
33687069
Citation
Hannon CW, McCourt C, Lima HC, Chen S, Bennett C. Interventions for cutaneous disease in systemic lupus erythematosus. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Mar 9;3(3):CD007478. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007478.pub2.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32909675
Citation
Casey KA, Smith MA, Sinibaldi D, Seto NL, Playford MP, Wang X, Carlucci PM, Wang L, Illei G, Yu B, Wang S, Remaley AT, Mehta NN, Kaplan MJ, White WI. Modulation of Cardiometabolic Disease Markers by Type I Interferon Inhibition in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2021 Mar;73(3):459-471. doi: 10.1002/art.41518. Epub 2021 Feb 15.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31660791
Citation
Brohawn PZ, Streicher K, Higgs BW, Morehouse C, Liu H, Illei G, Ranade K. Type I interferon gene signature test-low and -high patients with systemic lupus erythematosus have distinct gene expression signatures. Lupus. 2019 Nov;28(13):1524-1533. doi: 10.1177/0961203319885447. Epub 2019 Oct 29.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30538817
Citation
Casey KA, Guo X, Smith MA, Wang S, Sinibaldi D, Sanjuan MA, Wang L, Illei GG, White WI. Type I interferon receptor blockade with anifrolumab corrects innate and adaptive immune perturbations of SLE. Lupus Sci Med. 2018 Nov 22;5(1):e000286. doi: 10.1136/lupus-2018-000286. eCollection 2018. Erratum In: Lupus Sci Med. 2018 Dec 22;5(1):e000286corr1.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
28130918
Citation
Furie R, Khamashta M, Merrill JT, Werth VP, Kalunian K, Brohawn P, Illei GG, Drappa J, Wang L, Yoo S; CD1013 Study Investigators. Anifrolumab, an Anti-Interferon-alpha Receptor Monoclonal Antibody, in Moderate-to-Severe Systemic Lupus Erythematosus. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2017 Feb;69(2):376-386. doi: 10.1002/art.39962.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
A Study of the Efficacy and Safety of MEDI-546 in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs