search
Back to results

A Long-term Trial of OPC-34712 in Patients With Schizophrenia

Primary Purpose

Schizophrenia

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Japan
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
OPC-34712
Sponsored by
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Schizophrenia

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients age 18 years or older (at time of informed consent) diagnosed with schizophrenia based on DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria
  • Outpatients who are receiving an oral antipsychotic treatment (other than clozapine), who are considered to require maintenance therapy using antipsychotics, and for whom monotherapy with OPC-34712 is considered feasible

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Female patients who are breastfeeding or who have a positive pregnancy test (urine) result prior to receiving investigational medicinal product
  • Patients who are diagnosed with a disease other than schizophrenia (schizoaffective disorder, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorder, delirium, dementia, amnesia, or other cognitive disorder) based on current DSM-IV-TR Axis Ι criteria, or who are diagnosed with a personality disorder (borderline, paranoid, histrionic, schizotypal, schizoid, or antisocial)

Sites / Locations

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

OPC-34712

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an AE that started after start of investigational medicinal product (IMP) treatment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Mean Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score
The PANSS consisted of 3 subscales with 30 symptom constructs (positive subscale (7): delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinatory behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/perseckion, and hostility; negative subscale (7): blunted affect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive/apathetic social withdrawal, difficulty in abstract thinking, lack of spontaneity and conversation flow, stereotyped thinking and general psychopathology subscale (16): somatic concern, anxiety, guilt feelings, tension, mannerisms and posturing, depression, motor retardation, uncooperativeness, unusual thought content, disorientation, poor attention, lack of judgment and insight, disturbance of volition, poor impulse control, preoccupation, and active social avoidance). Severity was rated on 7-point scale with scores 1 (absence) & 7 (extremely severe). The PANSS Total score ranged from 7 (best possible outcome) to 210 (worst possible outcome).
Mean Change From Baseline in PANSS Positive Subscale Score
The PANSS consisted of three subscales that contained a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity is rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 indicated the absence of symptoms and a score of 7 indicated extremely severe symptoms. In PANSS positive subscale, the 7 positive symptom constructs were: delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinatory behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/persecution, and hostility. The PANSS positive subscale score ranged from 7 (best possible outcome) to 49 (worst possible outcome).
Mean Change From Baseline in PANSS Negative Subscale Score
The PANSS consisted of three subscales that contained a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 indicated the absence of symptoms and a score of 7 indicated extremely severe symptoms. In PANSS negative subscale the severity was rated for the following 7 negative symptom constructs: blunted affect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive/apathetic social withdrawal, difficulty in abstract thinking, lack of spontaneity and flow of conversation, stereotyped thinking. The PANSS negative subscale score ranged from 7 (best possible outcome) to 49 (worst possible outcome).
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S)
Severity of illness for each participant was rated using the CGI-S, which was the secondary efficacy endpoint. To perform this assessment, the study physician answered the following question: "Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the participant at this time?" Response choices included: 0 = not assessed; 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline mentally ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; and 7 = among the most extremely ill participants.
Mean Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement(CGI-I)
The efficacy of trial medication was rated for each participant using the CGI-I. The study physician would rate the participant's total improvement whether or not it is due entirely to drug treatment. All responses were compared to the participant's condition at Baseline prior to the first dose of study medication. Response choices included: 0 = not assessed, 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse.

Full Information

First Posted
October 11, 2011
Last Updated
December 8, 2019
Sponsor
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01456897
Brief Title
A Long-term Trial of OPC-34712 in Patients With Schizophrenia
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
undefined (undefined)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
To investigate the safety and efficacy of long-term administration of OPC-34712 in patients with schizophrenia.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Schizophrenia

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
282 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
OPC-34712
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
OPC-34712
Intervention Description
orally administered once daily
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events
Description
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as an AE that started after start of investigational medicinal product (IMP) treatment.
Time Frame
From Baseline up to 52 Weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) Total Score
Description
The PANSS consisted of 3 subscales with 30 symptom constructs (positive subscale (7): delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinatory behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/perseckion, and hostility; negative subscale (7): blunted affect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive/apathetic social withdrawal, difficulty in abstract thinking, lack of spontaneity and conversation flow, stereotyped thinking and general psychopathology subscale (16): somatic concern, anxiety, guilt feelings, tension, mannerisms and posturing, depression, motor retardation, uncooperativeness, unusual thought content, disorientation, poor attention, lack of judgment and insight, disturbance of volition, poor impulse control, preoccupation, and active social avoidance). Severity was rated on 7-point scale with scores 1 (absence) & 7 (extremely severe). The PANSS Total score ranged from 7 (best possible outcome) to 210 (worst possible outcome).
Time Frame
From Baseline up to 52 Weeks including Week24, Week52, and Last Visit(LOCF)
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in PANSS Positive Subscale Score
Description
The PANSS consisted of three subscales that contained a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity is rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 indicated the absence of symptoms and a score of 7 indicated extremely severe symptoms. In PANSS positive subscale, the 7 positive symptom constructs were: delusions, conceptual disorganization, hallucinatory behavior, excitement, grandiosity, suspiciousness/persecution, and hostility. The PANSS positive subscale score ranged from 7 (best possible outcome) to 49 (worst possible outcome).
Time Frame
From Baseline up to 52 Weeks including Week24, Week52, and Last Visit(LOCF)
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in PANSS Negative Subscale Score
Description
The PANSS consisted of three subscales that contained a total of 30 symptom constructs. For each symptom construct, severity was rated on a 7-point scale, with a score of 1 indicated the absence of symptoms and a score of 7 indicated extremely severe symptoms. In PANSS negative subscale the severity was rated for the following 7 negative symptom constructs: blunted affect, emotional withdrawal, poor rapport, passive/apathetic social withdrawal, difficulty in abstract thinking, lack of spontaneity and flow of conversation, stereotyped thinking. The PANSS negative subscale score ranged from 7 (best possible outcome) to 49 (worst possible outcome).
Time Frame
From Baseline up to 52 Weeks including Week24, Week52, and Last Visit(LOCF)
Title
Mean Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity of Illness (CGI-S)
Description
Severity of illness for each participant was rated using the CGI-S, which was the secondary efficacy endpoint. To perform this assessment, the study physician answered the following question: "Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the participant at this time?" Response choices included: 0 = not assessed; 1 = normal, not at all ill; 2 = borderline mentally ill; 3 = mildly ill; 4 = moderately ill; 5 = markedly ill; 6 = severely ill; and 7 = among the most extremely ill participants.
Time Frame
From Baseline up to 52 Weeks including Week24, Week52, and Last Visit(LOCF)
Title
Mean Clinical Global Impression - Global Improvement(CGI-I)
Description
The efficacy of trial medication was rated for each participant using the CGI-I. The study physician would rate the participant's total improvement whether or not it is due entirely to drug treatment. All responses were compared to the participant's condition at Baseline prior to the first dose of study medication. Response choices included: 0 = not assessed, 1 = very much improved, 2 = much improved, 3 = minimally improved, 4 = no change, 5 = minimally worse, 6 = much worse, and 7 = very much worse.
Time Frame
From Baseline up to 52 Weeks including Week24, Week52, and Last Visit(LOCF)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients age 18 years or older (at time of informed consent) diagnosed with schizophrenia based on DSM-IV-TR diagnostic criteria Outpatients who are receiving an oral antipsychotic treatment (other than clozapine), who are considered to require maintenance therapy using antipsychotics, and for whom monotherapy with OPC-34712 is considered feasible Exclusion Criteria: Female patients who are breastfeeding or who have a positive pregnancy test (urine) result prior to receiving investigational medicinal product Patients who are diagnosed with a disease other than schizophrenia (schizoaffective disorder, major depressive disorder, bipolar disorder, posttraumatic stress disorder, anxiety disorder, delirium, dementia, amnesia, or other cognitive disorder) based on current DSM-IV-TR Axis Ι criteria, or who are diagnosed with a personality disorder (borderline, paranoid, histrionic, schizotypal, schizoid, or antisocial)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kyoji Imaoka, Operating Officer
Organizational Affiliation
Otsuka Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd.
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
City
Kanto Region
Country
Japan

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
32297486
Citation
Ishigooka J, Usami T, Iwashita S, Kojima Y, Matsuo S. Post-hoc analysis investigating the safety and efficacy of brexpiprazole in Japanese patients with schizophrenia who were switched from other antipsychotics in a long-term study (Secondary Publication). Neuropsychopharmacol Rep. 2020 Jun;40(2):122-129. doi: 10.1002/npr2.12107. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

A Long-term Trial of OPC-34712 in Patients With Schizophrenia

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs