A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) And Fotemustine in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma
Primary Purpose
Glioblastoma Multiforme
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
bevacizumab [Avastin]
fotemustine
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Glioblastoma Multiforme
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult patients, >/=18 years of age
- Diagnosis of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (Grade IV)
- Previous treatment with temozolomide and radiotherapy
- First recurrence after standard adjuvant treatment (surgery, followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy)
- Adequate hematological, biochemical and organ functions
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous treatment with Avastin or other anti-angiogenic drugs
- Residual relevant toxicity resulting from previous therapy
- Radiotherapy within the 3 months prior to the diagnosis of disease progression
- Chemotherapy in the previous 4 weeks
- Other active or inactive malignancies (except for carcinoma in situ of the cervix, of the prostate or basal cell carcinoma)
- Clinically significant cardiovascular diseases
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Arm Label
Calibration Arm
Investigational Arm
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Percentage of Participants Alive 6 Months After Start of Treatment
Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of MRI assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Percentage of Participants Who Were Alive and Progression Free 6 Months After Start of Treatment
Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to the date of the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Progression was assessed using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) or Macdonald Response Criteria, whichever occurred first. As per the RANO criteria, progression was defined as 25% or more increase in enhancing lesions despite stable or increasing steroid dose; increase (significant) in non-enhancing T2/FLAIR lesions, not attributable to other non-tumor causes; any new lesions; and clinical deterioration (not attributable to other non-tumor causes and not due to steroid decrease). As per the Macdonald criteria, progression was defined as 25% or more increase in enhancing lesions; any new lesions; and clinical deterioration.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to the date of the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Progression was assessed using the RANO or the Macdonald Response Criteria, whichever occurred first. As per RANO criteria, progression was defined as 25% or more increase in enhancing lesions despite stable or increasing steroid dose; increase (significant) in non-enhancing T2/FLAIR lesions, not attributable to other non-tumor causes; any new lesions; and clinical deterioration (not attributable to other non-tumor causes and not due to steroid decrease). As per Macdonald criteria, progression was defined as 25% or more increase in enhancing lesions; any new lesions; and clinical deterioration.
Percentage of Participants Alive 9 Months After Start of Treatment
OS was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of MRI assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Percentage of Participants Alive 12 Months After Start of Treatment
OS was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of MRI assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Percentage of Participants Alive 30 Days After Last Dose of Study Drug
OS was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of MRI assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)
Percentage of participants achieving CR or PR as overall response between first drug administration and documented disease progression were calculated. Tumor response was evaluated according to both the RANO and the Macdonald response criteria. As per Macdonald criteria, CR was defined as the disappearance of all enhancing disease, sustained for at least 4 weeks, and no new lesions along with clinical features of clinically stable or improved, with no corticosteroid; PR was defined as a 50% or more decrease of all measurable enhancing lesions, sustained for at least 4 weeks, and no new lesion along with clinical features of clinically stable or improved, with stable or reduced corticosteroids. RANO criteria defined CR and PR the same as Macdonald criteria with the following additions: CR - improved non enhancing T2/FLAIR lesions; PR - no progression of non-measurable disease, stable or improved non enhancing FLAIR/T2 lesions.
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
EORTC QLQ-C30: included global health status/quality of life (QOL), functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), and single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). Most questions used a 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used a 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores were averaged and transformed to 0-100 scale; a higher score for Global QOL/functional scales indicates better level of QOL/functioning, or a higher score for symptom scale indicates greater degree of symptoms.
Percentage of Participants With Corticosteroid Initiation During the Study Period
Corticosteroid initiation was assessed in participants not receiving corticosteroids at screening. The participant had the event if he/she started on corticosteroids with a dosage greater than equal to (>/=) 2 mg dexamethasone equivalent.
Time to Corticosteroid Initiation
Time to corticosteroid initiation was defined as the time from screening to the start date of the first corticosteroid administration in participants not receiving corticosteroids at screening. The participant had the event if he/she started on corticosteroids with a dosage ≥2 mg dexamethasone equivalent. Instead, if the participant was not known to have the event, time was censored at the last available visit date. Time to corticosteroid initiation was estimated using Kaplan Meier method.
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Corticosteroid use was classified as: 1. No Change (if corticosteroid dose at each assessment was equal to baseline); 2. Decreased (if corticosteroid dose at each assessment was lower than baseline); 3. Increased (corticosteroid dose at each assessment was greater than baseline).
Percentage of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Deterioration
Deterioration of KPS was defined as a decrease of at least 20 percentage points with respect to the screening. KPS is an 11-level score which ranges between 0 (death) to 100 (complete healthy status); a higher score represents a higher ability to perform daily tasks.
Time to Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Deterioration
Time to KPS deterioration was defined as the time from screening to the first date of deterioration of the KPS score. Deterioration of KPS was defined as a decrease of at least 20 percentage points with respect to the screening. KPS is an 11-level score which ranges between 0 (death) to 100 (complete healthy status); a higher score represents a higher ability to perform daily tasks. Time to KPS deterioration was estimated using Kaplan Meier method. If the participant was not known to have the event, time was censored at the last available visit date.
Percentage of Participants With World Health Organization (WHO) Performance Status (PS) Deterioration
WHO PS deterioration was defined as a decrease of at least 1 point with respect to the screening value. WHO PS is a 6-level score which ranges between 0 (fully active) to 5 (death); a lower score represents a higher ability to perform daily tasks.
Time to WHO PS Deterioration
Time to WHO PS deterioration was defined as the time from randomization to the first date of deterioration of the WHO performance status score. WHO PS deterioration was defined as a decrease of at least 1 point with respect to the screening value. WHO PS is a 6-level score which ranges between 0 (fully active) to 5 (death); a lower score represents a higher ability to perform daily tasks.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01474239
Brief Title
A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) And Fotemustine in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma
Official Title
Randomized Non Comparative Phase II Trial With Bevacizumab and Fotemustine in the Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
September 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2013 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Hoffmann-La Roche
4. Oversight
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This randomized, non-comparative study will evaluate the efficacy and safety of Avastin (bevacizumab) in patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Patients will be randomized to receive Avastin 10 mg/kg intravenously every 2 weeks or fotemustine 75 mg/m2 on days 1, 8 and 15, followed by, after a 5 weeks interval, 100 mg/m2 intravenously every 3 weeks. Treatment with fotemustine serves as a calibration arm and no formal efficacy comparison will be made between the two treatment arms. The anticipated time of study treatment is until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Glioblastoma Multiforme
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
91 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Calibration Arm
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Investigational Arm
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
bevacizumab [Avastin]
Intervention Description
10 mg/kg every 2 weeks intravenously until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
fotemustine
Intervention Description
75 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1, 8 and 15 followed by, after a 5 weeks interval, 100 mg/m2 on day 1 of a 3-weeks cycle. Until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants Alive 6 Months After Start of Treatment
Description
Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Overall Survival (OS)
Description
OS was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of MRI assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time Frame
Baseline until death (up to 691 days)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Were Alive and Progression Free 6 Months After Start of Treatment
Description
Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to the date of the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Progression was assessed using Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) or Macdonald Response Criteria, whichever occurred first. As per the RANO criteria, progression was defined as 25% or more increase in enhancing lesions despite stable or increasing steroid dose; increase (significant) in non-enhancing T2/FLAIR lesions, not attributable to other non-tumor causes; any new lesions; and clinical deterioration (not attributable to other non-tumor causes and not due to steroid decrease). As per the Macdonald criteria, progression was defined as 25% or more increase in enhancing lesions; any new lesions; and clinical deterioration.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Description
PFS was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to the date of the first occurrence of disease progression or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PFS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Progression was assessed using the RANO or the Macdonald Response Criteria, whichever occurred first. As per RANO criteria, progression was defined as 25% or more increase in enhancing lesions despite stable or increasing steroid dose; increase (significant) in non-enhancing T2/FLAIR lesions, not attributable to other non-tumor causes; any new lesions; and clinical deterioration (not attributable to other non-tumor causes and not due to steroid decrease). As per Macdonald criteria, progression was defined as 25% or more increase in enhancing lesions; any new lesions; and clinical deterioration.
Time Frame
Baseline until disease progression or death (baseline, 46 days after first administration of study drug, and thereafter every 56 days up to 691 days)
Title
Percentage of Participants Alive 9 Months After Start of Treatment
Description
OS was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of MRI assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time Frame
9 months
Title
Percentage of Participants Alive 12 Months After Start of Treatment
Description
OS was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of MRI assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Percentage of Participants Alive 30 Days After Last Dose of Study Drug
Description
OS was defined as the time in months from the start of treatment to death due to any cause. If a participant was not known to have died, time was censored at the last date the participant was known to be alive, which was defined as the latest among date of last visit, date of last sample collected for laboratory exam, date of MRI assessment, date of last treatment, date of discontinuation and date of last available follow-up visit. Participants with no information after baseline were censored at Day 1. OS was estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method.
Time Frame
30 days after last dose of study drug (up to Day 600)
Title
Percentage of Participants With a Best Overall Response of Complete Response (CR) or Partial Response (PR)
Description
Percentage of participants achieving CR or PR as overall response between first drug administration and documented disease progression were calculated. Tumor response was evaluated according to both the RANO and the Macdonald response criteria. As per Macdonald criteria, CR was defined as the disappearance of all enhancing disease, sustained for at least 4 weeks, and no new lesions along with clinical features of clinically stable or improved, with no corticosteroid; PR was defined as a 50% or more decrease of all measurable enhancing lesions, sustained for at least 4 weeks, and no new lesion along with clinical features of clinically stable or improved, with stable or reduced corticosteroids. RANO criteria defined CR and PR the same as Macdonald criteria with the following additions: CR - improved non enhancing T2/FLAIR lesions; PR - no progression of non-measurable disease, stable or improved non enhancing FLAIR/T2 lesions.
Time Frame
Baseline until disease progression or death (baseline, 46 days after first administration of study drug, and thereafter every 56 days up to 691 days)
Title
Change From Screening in European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) Scores at Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Description
EORTC QLQ-C30: included global health status/quality of life (QOL), functional scales (physical, role, cognitive, emotional, and social), symptom scales (fatigue, pain, nausea/vomiting), and single items (dyspnea, appetite loss, insomnia, constipation, diarrhea, and financial difficulties). Most questions used a 4-point scale (1 'Not at All' to 4 'Very Much'); 2 questions used a 7-point scale (1 'Very Poor' to 7 'Excellent'). Scores were averaged and transformed to 0-100 scale; a higher score for Global QOL/functional scales indicates better level of QOL/functioning, or a higher score for symptom scale indicates greater degree of symptoms.
Time Frame
Screening, Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, and 72
Title
Percentage of Participants With Corticosteroid Initiation During the Study Period
Description
Corticosteroid initiation was assessed in participants not receiving corticosteroids at screening. The participant had the event if he/she started on corticosteroids with a dosage greater than equal to (>/=) 2 mg dexamethasone equivalent.
Time Frame
Baseline until recurrence (up to 691 days)
Title
Time to Corticosteroid Initiation
Description
Time to corticosteroid initiation was defined as the time from screening to the start date of the first corticosteroid administration in participants not receiving corticosteroids at screening. The participant had the event if he/she started on corticosteroids with a dosage ≥2 mg dexamethasone equivalent. Instead, if the participant was not known to have the event, time was censored at the last available visit date. Time to corticosteroid initiation was estimated using Kaplan Meier method.
Time Frame
Baseline until recurrence (up to 691 days)
Title
Percentage of Participants in Each Class of Corticosteroid Use
Description
Corticosteroid use was classified as: 1. No Change (if corticosteroid dose at each assessment was equal to baseline); 2. Decreased (if corticosteroid dose at each assessment was lower than baseline); 3. Increased (corticosteroid dose at each assessment was greater than baseline).
Time Frame
Weeks 8, 16, 24, 32, 40, 48, 56, 64, 72, 80, 88, post-treatment follow-up (up to Day 691)
Title
Percentage of Participants With Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Deterioration
Description
Deterioration of KPS was defined as a decrease of at least 20 percentage points with respect to the screening. KPS is an 11-level score which ranges between 0 (death) to 100 (complete healthy status); a higher score represents a higher ability to perform daily tasks.
Time Frame
Baseline until KPS deterioration (up to 691 days)
Title
Time to Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) Deterioration
Description
Time to KPS deterioration was defined as the time from screening to the first date of deterioration of the KPS score. Deterioration of KPS was defined as a decrease of at least 20 percentage points with respect to the screening. KPS is an 11-level score which ranges between 0 (death) to 100 (complete healthy status); a higher score represents a higher ability to perform daily tasks. Time to KPS deterioration was estimated using Kaplan Meier method. If the participant was not known to have the event, time was censored at the last available visit date.
Time Frame
Baseline until KPS deterioration (up to 691 days)
Title
Percentage of Participants With World Health Organization (WHO) Performance Status (PS) Deterioration
Description
WHO PS deterioration was defined as a decrease of at least 1 point with respect to the screening value. WHO PS is a 6-level score which ranges between 0 (fully active) to 5 (death); a lower score represents a higher ability to perform daily tasks.
Time Frame
Baseline until WHO PS deterioration (Up to 691 days)
Title
Time to WHO PS Deterioration
Description
Time to WHO PS deterioration was defined as the time from randomization to the first date of deterioration of the WHO performance status score. WHO PS deterioration was defined as a decrease of at least 1 point with respect to the screening value. WHO PS is a 6-level score which ranges between 0 (fully active) to 5 (death); a lower score represents a higher ability to perform daily tasks.
Time Frame
Baseline until WHO PS deterioration (Up to 691 days)
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Adult patients, >/=18 years of age
Diagnosis of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (Grade IV)
Previous treatment with temozolomide and radiotherapy
First recurrence after standard adjuvant treatment (surgery, followed by radiotherapy and chemotherapy)
Adequate hematological, biochemical and organ functions
Exclusion Criteria:
Previous treatment with Avastin or other anti-angiogenic drugs
Residual relevant toxicity resulting from previous therapy
Radiotherapy within the 3 months prior to the diagnosis of disease progression
Chemotherapy in the previous 4 weeks
Other active or inactive malignancies (except for carcinoma in situ of the cervix, of the prostate or basal cell carcinoma)
Clinically significant cardiovascular diseases
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clinical Trials
Organizational Affiliation
Hoffmann-La Roche
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
City
Napoli
State/Province
Campania
ZIP/Postal Code
80131
Country
Italy
City
Bologna
State/Province
Emilia-Romagna
ZIP/Postal Code
40133
Country
Italy
City
Roma
State/Province
Lazio
ZIP/Postal Code
00168
Country
Italy
City
Genova
State/Province
Liguria
ZIP/Postal Code
16128
Country
Italy
City
Milano
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
20132
Country
Italy
City
Milano
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
20133
Country
Italy
City
San Giovanni Rotondo
State/Province
Puglia
ZIP/Postal Code
71013
Country
Italy
City
Terni
State/Province
Umbria
ZIP/Postal Code
05100
Country
Italy
City
Padova
State/Province
Veneto
ZIP/Postal Code
35128
Country
Italy
City
Treviso
State/Province
Veneto
ZIP/Postal Code
31100
Country
Italy
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26951379
Citation
Brandes AA, Finocchiaro G, Zagonel V, Reni M, Caserta C, Fabi A, Clavarezza M, Maiello E, Eoli M, Lombardi G, Monteforte M, Proietti E, Agati R, Eusebi V, Franceschi E. AVAREG: a phase II, randomized, noncomparative study of fotemustine or bevacizumab for patients with recurrent glioblastoma. Neuro Oncol. 2016 Sep;18(9):1304-12. doi: 10.1093/neuonc/now035. Epub 2016 Mar 6.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
A Study of Avastin (Bevacizumab) And Fotemustine in Patients With Recurrent Glioblastoma
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs