search
Back to results

Efficacy of TAK-438 Compared to Placebo in the Treatment of Non-Erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Primary Purpose

Non-erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Japan
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
TAK-438
TAK-438
Placebo
Sponsored by
Takeda
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Non-erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease focused on measuring Drug Therapy

Eligibility Criteria

20 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants with grade N or M in the modified LA classification system confirmed by endoscopy at initiation of the pre-observation period (VISIT 1).
  2. Participants with repeated acid reflux symptoms (heartburn or regurgitation) for 2 days or more in one week in the 3 weeks before initiation of initiation of the pre-observation period (VISIT 1).
  3. Participants with severity* of moderate or higher for acid reflux symptoms (heartburn or regurgitation) in the 3 weeks before initiation of the pre-observation period (VISIT 1)

    * Severity: No symptoms, very mild (symptoms present but often forgotten), mild (not so painful), moderate (rather painful), severe (painful) and very severe (painful enough to affect night time sleep or daily activities)

  4. Outpatients (hospitalization for testing possible)

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participants with an esophagus-related complication [Barrett's esophagus (3 cm or more, LSBE), eosinophilic esophagitis, esophageal varices, scleroderma, viral or fungal infections, esophageal stenosis, etc.], or a history of radiotherapy or cryotherapy of the esophagus, a caustic or physiochemical trauma (esophageal sclerotherapy, etc.). However, participants with Barrett's esophagus (less than 3 cm, SSBE) or Schatzki's ring (mucosal tissue ring around inferior esophageal sphincter) are allowed to be included.
  2. Participants who have received surgery or treatment affecting gastroesophageal reflux (cardioplasty, dilation of esophageal stenosis [excluding Schatzki's ring], etc.), or who have a history of surgery of stomach or duodenum (excluding removal of benign polyp under endoscopy)
  3. Participants who have acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, gastric ulcers (mucosal defects associated with white coating) or duodenal ulcers (mucosal defect with white coating) within 30 days before initiation of the pre-observation period (VISIT 1) However, participants with gastric or duodenal erosions are allowed to be included.
  4. Participants with acute gastritis or acute exacerbation of chronic gastritis as a complication
  5. Participants with a previous or current history of the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome or other gastric acid hypersecretion disorders
  6. Participants with a history of chest pain due to heart disease or with chest pains suspected of being caused by heart disease within one year before initiation of the pre-observation period (VISIT 1)

Sites / Locations

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

TAK-438 10 mg QD

TAK-438 20 mg QD

Placebo QD

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of symptom-free days of heartburn symptoms
Heartburn symptoms will be collected by participant diaries.
Cumulative symptom improvement rate of heartburn symptoms
Heartburn symptoms will be collected by participant diaries.
Severity of heartburn symptoms
Heartburn symptoms will be collected by participant diaries.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Heartburn symptoms stratified by response (improvement or non-improvement) at Week 2
Heartburn symptoms will be collected by participant diaries. Percentage of symptom-free days, cumulative symptom improvement rate, and severity of heartburn symptoms are evaluation parameters.
Heartburn Symptoms Stratified by Baseline Endoscopic Findings (Grade N or M)
Heartburn symptoms collected by participant diaries. Percentage of symptom-free days, cumulative symptom improvement rate and severity of heartburn symptoms=evaluation parameters. Participants with Non-Erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease divided into Grade N (endoscopically normal) and M (minimal change) by modified Los Angeles Classification System. Grade definitions: Grade N (endoscopically normal), M (minimal change), A (Mucosal break <5 mm) B (Mucosal break ≥5 mm) C (Mucosal break continuous between 2 or more folds and <75% of circumference) and D (Mucosal break ≥75% of circumference).
Heartburn symptoms stratified by combination of response at Week 2 and baseline endoscopic findings (improvement and grade N, improvement and grade M, non-improvement and grade N, non-improvement and grade M.)
Heartburn symptoms will be collected by participant diaries. Percentage of symptom-free days, cumulative symptom improvement rate, and severity of heartburn symptoms are evaluation parameters.

Full Information

First Posted
October 24, 2011
Last Updated
July 2, 2013
Sponsor
Takeda
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01474369
Brief Title
Efficacy of TAK-438 Compared to Placebo in the Treatment of Non-Erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Official Title
A Phase 3, Randomized, Double Blind, Placebo Control, Multicenter Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of TAK- 438 (10 and 20 mg Once-Daily) in Patients With Non-Erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
February 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 2013 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Takeda

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate the superiority of efficacy of TAK-438, once daily (QD), to placebo in patients with non-erosive gastroesophageal reflux disease.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Non-erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Keywords
Drug Therapy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
827 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
TAK-438 10 mg QD
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
TAK-438 20 mg QD
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Placebo QD
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
TAK-438
Intervention Description
TAK-438 10 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for 4 weeks. Thereafter, TAK-438 placebo tablets, orally, once daily for 1 week.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
TAK-438
Intervention Description
TAK-438 20 mg, tablets, orally, once daily for 4 weeks. Thereafter, TAK-438 placebo tablets, orally, once daily for 1 week.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
TAK-438 placebo-matching tablets, orally, once daily for 5 weeks.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of symptom-free days of heartburn symptoms
Description
Heartburn symptoms will be collected by participant diaries.
Time Frame
Week 4
Title
Cumulative symptom improvement rate of heartburn symptoms
Description
Heartburn symptoms will be collected by participant diaries.
Time Frame
Week 4
Title
Severity of heartburn symptoms
Description
Heartburn symptoms will be collected by participant diaries.
Time Frame
Week 4
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Heartburn symptoms stratified by response (improvement or non-improvement) at Week 2
Description
Heartburn symptoms will be collected by participant diaries. Percentage of symptom-free days, cumulative symptom improvement rate, and severity of heartburn symptoms are evaluation parameters.
Time Frame
Week 4
Title
Heartburn Symptoms Stratified by Baseline Endoscopic Findings (Grade N or M)
Description
Heartburn symptoms collected by participant diaries. Percentage of symptom-free days, cumulative symptom improvement rate and severity of heartburn symptoms=evaluation parameters. Participants with Non-Erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease divided into Grade N (endoscopically normal) and M (minimal change) by modified Los Angeles Classification System. Grade definitions: Grade N (endoscopically normal), M (minimal change), A (Mucosal break <5 mm) B (Mucosal break ≥5 mm) C (Mucosal break continuous between 2 or more folds and <75% of circumference) and D (Mucosal break ≥75% of circumference).
Time Frame
Week 4
Title
Heartburn symptoms stratified by combination of response at Week 2 and baseline endoscopic findings (improvement and grade N, improvement and grade M, non-improvement and grade N, non-improvement and grade M.)
Description
Heartburn symptoms will be collected by participant diaries. Percentage of symptom-free days, cumulative symptom improvement rate, and severity of heartburn symptoms are evaluation parameters.
Time Frame
Week 4

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Participants with grade N or M in the modified LA classification system confirmed by endoscopy at initiation of the pre-observation period (VISIT 1). Participants with repeated acid reflux symptoms (heartburn or regurgitation) for 2 days or more in one week in the 3 weeks before initiation of initiation of the pre-observation period (VISIT 1). Participants with severity* of moderate or higher for acid reflux symptoms (heartburn or regurgitation) in the 3 weeks before initiation of the pre-observation period (VISIT 1) * Severity: No symptoms, very mild (symptoms present but often forgotten), mild (not so painful), moderate (rather painful), severe (painful) and very severe (painful enough to affect night time sleep or daily activities) Outpatients (hospitalization for testing possible) Exclusion Criteria: Participants with an esophagus-related complication [Barrett's esophagus (3 cm or more, LSBE), eosinophilic esophagitis, esophageal varices, scleroderma, viral or fungal infections, esophageal stenosis, etc.], or a history of radiotherapy or cryotherapy of the esophagus, a caustic or physiochemical trauma (esophageal sclerotherapy, etc.). However, participants with Barrett's esophagus (less than 3 cm, SSBE) or Schatzki's ring (mucosal tissue ring around inferior esophageal sphincter) are allowed to be included. Participants who have received surgery or treatment affecting gastroesophageal reflux (cardioplasty, dilation of esophageal stenosis [excluding Schatzki's ring], etc.), or who have a history of surgery of stomach or duodenum (excluding removal of benign polyp under endoscopy) Participants who have acute upper gastrointestinal bleeding, gastric ulcers (mucosal defects associated with white coating) or duodenal ulcers (mucosal defect with white coating) within 30 days before initiation of the pre-observation period (VISIT 1) However, participants with gastric or duodenal erosions are allowed to be included. Participants with acute gastritis or acute exacerbation of chronic gastritis as a complication Participants with a previous or current history of the Zollinger-Ellison syndrome or other gastric acid hypersecretion disorders Participants with a history of chest pain due to heart disease or with chest pains suspected of being caused by heart disease within one year before initiation of the pre-observation period (VISIT 1)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Senior Manager
Organizational Affiliation
Takeda
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
City
Nagoya-shi
State/Province
Aichi
Country
Japan
City
Abiko-shi
State/Province
Chiba
Country
Japan
City
Kashiwa-shi
State/Province
Chiba
Country
Japan
City
Noda-shi
State/Province
Chiba
Country
Japan
City
Yachiyo-shi
State/Province
Chiba
Country
Japan
City
Saijo-shi
State/Province
Ehime
Country
Japan
City
Fukuoka-shi
State/Province
Fukuoka
Country
Japan
City
Itoshima-shi
State/Province
Fukuoka
Country
Japan
City
Kasuya-gun
State/Province
Fukuoka
Country
Japan
City
Onga-gun
State/Province
Fukuoka
Country
Japan
City
Kouriyama-shi
State/Province
Fukushima
Country
Japan
City
Gifu-shi
State/Province
Gifu
Country
Japan
City
Takayama-shi
State/Province
Gifu
Country
Japan
City
Annaka-shi
State/Province
Gunma
Country
Japan
City
Hiroshima-shi
State/Province
Hiroshima
Country
Japan
City
Asahikawa-shi
State/Province
Hokkaido
Country
Japan
City
Sapporo-shi
State/Province
Hokkaido
Country
Japan
City
Amagasaki-shi
State/Province
Hyogo
Country
Japan
City
Kobe-shi
State/Province
Hyogo
Country
Japan
City
Nishinomiya-shi
State/Province
Hyogo
Country
Japan
City
Takarazuka-shi
State/Province
Hyogo
Country
Japan
City
Sagamihara-shi
State/Province
Kanagawa
Country
Japan
City
Yokohama-shi
State/Province
Kanagawa
Country
Japan
City
Kochi-shi
State/Province
Kochi
Country
Japan
City
Suzaki-shi
State/Province
Kochi
Country
Japan
City
Kumamoto-shi
State/Province
Kumamoto
Country
Japan
City
Kyoto-shi
State/Province
Kyoto
Country
Japan
City
Sendai-shi
State/Province
Miyagi
Country
Japan
City
Nagasaki-shi
State/Province
Nagasaki
Country
Japan
City
Oita-shi
State/Province
Oita
Country
Japan
City
Okayama-shi
State/Province
Okayama
Country
Japan
City
Osaka-shi
State/Province
Osaka
Country
Japan
City
Takatsuki-shi
State/Province
Osaka
Country
Japan
City
Saga-shi
State/Province
Saga
Country
Japan
City
Kumagaya-shi
State/Province
Saitama
Country
Japan
City
Saitama-shi
State/Province
Saitama
Country
Japan
City
Tokorozawa-shi
State/Province
Saitama
Country
Japan
City
Otawara-shi
State/Province
Tochigi
Country
Japan
City
Bunkyo-ku
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
City
Chiyoda-ku
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
City
Chuo-ku
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
City
Hachioji-shi
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
City
Kokubunji-shi
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
City
Nakano-ku
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
City
Oota-ku
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
City
Setagaya-ku
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
City
Shibuya-ku
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
City
Shinjuku-ku
State/Province
Tokyo
Country
Japan
City
Shimonoseki-shi
State/Province
Yamaguchi
Country
Japan
City
Kofu-shi
State/Province
Yamanashi
Country
Japan
City
Turu-shi
State/Province
Yamanashi
Country
Japan
City
Yamagata-shi
State/Province
Ymagata
Country
Japan

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
28119763
Citation
Kinoshita Y, Sakurai Y, Shiino M, Kudou K, Nishimura A, Miyagi T, Iwakiri K, Umegaki E, Ashida K. Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Vonoprazan in Patients with Nonerosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease: A Phase III, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Study. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2016 Dec 21;81-82:1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2016.12.001. eCollection 2016.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy of TAK-438 Compared to Placebo in the Treatment of Non-Erosive Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs