Efficacy and Safety Study of Pregabalin in the Treatment of Pain on Walking in Patients With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN)
Primary Purpose
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Pregabalin
placebo
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy focused on measuring Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy, Pain on Walking, Pregabalin
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Men or women who are at least 18 years old.
- Diagnosis of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
- Pain on walking.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Inability to walk 50 feet on a flat surface.
- Pain on walking due to conditions other than diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
Sites / Locations
- Dedicated Clinical Research
- Arizona Research Center
- Neuro-Pain Medical Center
- HealthCare Partners Medical Group
- IDS Pharmacy
- University of Southern California
- PAB Clinical Research
- Pulmonary Associates of Brandon
- Innovative Research of West Florida, Inc.
- The Office of Laszlo Jozef Mate, MD
- Meridien Research
- Metabolic Research Institute, Inc.
- Clinical Research of Central Florida
- Columbus Research Foundation
- MediSphere Medical Research Center, LLC
- Heartland Research Associates, LLC
- Quality Clinical Research, Inc.
- Desert Endocrinology Clinical Research Center
- Clinical Research Consortium
- The Office of Dr. Stephen H. Miller, MD
- The Medical Research Network, LLC
- Neurology and Neuroscience Center of Ohio
- Sooner Clinical Research
- The Office of Veronique Sebastian, MD
- Sunstone Medical Research, LLC
- Oregon Health and Science University - Comprehensive Pain Center
- Oregon Health and Science University - Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine
- Blair Orthopedic Associates, Inc.
- Altoona Center for Clinical Research
- Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island
- Neurology and Pain Clinic, LLC
- Houston Neurocare
- Centex Research, Inc.
- Eastern Virginia Medical School
- Privatni specializovana ambulance pro neurologii a detskou neurologii
- Clintrial, s.r.o.
- Fakultni nemocnice v Motole
- Dr DR Lakha's Practice
- Dr Hemant Makan (Private Practice)
- Randles Road Medical Centre
- Richards Bay Trial Centre
- Forskningsmottagningen Gamla Sjukhuset i Falkoping
- Center for Lakemedelsstudier
- Citydiabetes
- Bragee Medect AB
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
Pregabain
Placebo
Arm Description
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Average Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN) Pain Based on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over the Last 7 Days of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
The daily pain diary consisted of an 11-point numeric scale ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst possible pain"). Participants described their pain during the past 24 hours by having chosen the appropriate number between 0 and 10. Self-assessment was performed daily each evening before bedtime (6.00 pm to midnight) on the telephone via Interactive Voice Recognition System (IVRS). The endpoint mean pain score was defined as the mean of the last 7 daily diary pain ratings while taking study medication in each treatment period - Period 1 and Period 2, respectively. A rating of 1 - 3 was considered as mild pain; 4 - 6 as moderate pain; and 7 - 10 as severe pain.
DPN Pain on Walking Based on a 11-point NRS of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
The post-test DPN pain on walking NRS consisted of an 11-point numeric scale ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst possible pain"). Participants described their DPN pain in their legs and/or feet while walking during the 50-foot walk test by choosing the appropriate number between 0 and 10. The post-test DPN pain on walking NRS was completed by the participant using paper-pen administration immediately after completing the 50-foot walk test at the end of each treatment period - Period 1 and Period 2, respectively. A rating of 1 - 3 was considered as mild pain; 4 - 6 as moderate pain; and 7 - 10 as severe pain.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Percentage of Participants Achieving 30% Reduction in Mean DPN Pain Score From Baseline at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
The daily pain diary consisted of an 11-point numeric scale ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst possible pain"). Participants described their pain during the past 24 hours by having chosen the appropriate number between 0 and 10. Self-assessment was performed daily each evening before bedtime (6.00 pm to midnight) on the telephone via IVRS. The endpoint mean pain score was defined as the mean of the last 7 daily diary pain ratings while taking study medication in each treatment period - Period 1 and Period 2, respectively. A rating of 1 - 3 was considered as mild pain; 4 - 6 as moderate pain; and 7 - 10 as severe pain.
Percentage of Participants Achieving 50% Reduction in Mean DPN Pain Score From Baseline at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
The daily pain diary consisted of an 11-point numeric scale ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst possible pain"). Participants described their pain during the past 24 hours by having chosen the appropriate number between 0 and 10. Self-assessment was performed daily each evening before bedtime (6.00 pm to midnight) on the telephone via IVRS. The endpoint mean pain score was defined as the mean of the last 7 daily diary pain ratings while taking study medication in each treatment period - Period 1 and Period 2, respectively. A rating of 1 - 3 was considered as mild pain; 4 - 6 as moderate pain; and 7 - 10 as severe pain.
Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Score for Pain-Severity Domain at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
The BPI-sf is a self-administered questionnaire developed to assess the severity of pain and the impact of pain on daily functions during a 24 hour period prior to evaluation. The BPI-sf consists of 5 questions: 4 items measure pain (0: no pain; 10: worst pain possible) at its "worst, "least", "average", and "now" (current pain) on an 11-point scale. Scores range from 0 - 40 with higher scores indicating greater pain severity. Another item, containing 7 sub-questions, evaluates the level of interference of pain on daily functioning (general activity, walking, work ability, mood, enjoyment of life, relations with other people, and sleep) on 11-point scales (0: does not interfere; 10: completely interferes). Scores range from 0 - 70 with higher scores indicating greater interference.
BPI-sf Score for Pain-Interference Domain at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
The BPI-sf is a self-administered questionnaire developed to assess the severity of pain and the impact of pain on daily functions during a 24 hour period prior to evaluation. The BPI-sf consists of 5 questions: 4 items measure pain (0: no pain; 10: worst pain possible) at its "worst, "least", "average", and "now" (current pain) on an 11-point scale. Scores range from 0 - 40 with higher scores indicating greater pain severity. Another item, containing 7 sub-questions, evaluates the level of interference of pain on daily functioning (general activity, walking, work ability, mood, enjoyment of life, relations with other people, and sleep) on 11-point scales (0: does not interfere; 10: completely interferes). Scores range from 0 - 70 with higher scores indicating greater interference.
BPI-sf Score for Pain-Interference With Walking Ability at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
The BPI-sf is a self-administered questionnaire developed to assess the severity of pain and the impact of pain on daily functions during a 24 hour period prior to evaluation. The BPI-sf consists of 5 questions: 4 items measure pain on an 11-point scale. Scores range from 0 - 40 with higher scores indicating greater pain severity. Another item, containing 7 sub-questions, evaluates the level of interference of pain on daily functioning (general activity, walking, work ability, mood, enjoyment of life, relations with other people, and sleep) on 11-point scales (0: does not interfere; 10: completely interferes). Scores range from 0 - 70 with higher scores indicating greater interference. The sub-score pain interference with walking ability was evaluated, as it was considered to be the most relevant in the context of this study.
Daytime Total Activity Counts Per Day Measured by Actigraphy Over the Last 7 Days of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
Actigraphy data which measured steps and daytime activity during waking hours were assessed for the last 7 days at Baseline, Visit 6, and Visit 11. Activity counts are the units of motion. It is equal to the sum of peak accelerations each second during the epoch (60 seconds). Total activity counts per day is the sum of the activity counts for each epoch (60 seconds) during the "day" (non-sleep period). Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the hip during the waking hours. It was programmed to record movements while the device was being worn.
Steps Per Day Measured by Actigraphy Over the Last 7 Days of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
Actigraphy data which measured steps and daytime activity during waking hours were assessed for the last 7 days at Baseline, Visit 6, and Visit 11. The participants were instructed to wear the device on their hip during the waking hours.
Walk 12 Questionnaire Over the Last 2 Weeks of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
The Walk-12 is a self-administered questionnaire that assesses the impact of the participant's diabetic neuropathy over the past 2 weeks on parameters associated with walking (12 questions) based on a 5-point scale (from not at all to extremely). The total score is the sum of scores from the 12 questions, which then gets transferred to a 0-100 scale with higher scores indicating greater impairment
Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) Total Quality of Life (TQOL) Score Measured Over the Last 2 Weeks of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
Norfolk QOL-DN is a 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess impact of diabetic neuropathy on the quality of life of participants with diabetic neuropathy. All symptoms (1 - 7) are scored as either 1 or 0, indicating presence or absence of the symptom. With the exception of questions 31 and 32, the other items are scored according to the 5-point Likert Scale (0 - 4, "no problem" to "severe problem"). In question 31, "good", the middle item, is scored as 0, "very good" as -1, "excellent" as -2, "fair" as 1, and "poor" as 2. In question 32, "about the same", the middle item, is scored as 0, "somewhat better" as -1, "much better" as -2, "somewhat worse" as 1, and "much worse" as 2. TQOL score should be summed as follow: sum (Σ) (1 - 7, 8 - 35). The scales and subscales are calculated without weighting of any kind, and reported as the integer sum of the listed questionnaire items.
Norfolk QOL-DN Symptoms Domain Score Measured Over the Last 2 Weeks of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
Norfolk QOL-DN is a 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess impact of diabetic neuropathy on the quality of life of participants with diabetic neuropathy. All symptoms (1 - 7) are scored as either 1 or 0, indicating presence or absence of the symptom. With the exception of questions 31 and 32, the other items are scored according to the 5-point Likert Scale (0 - 4, "no problem" to "severe problem"). In question 31, "good", the middle item, is scored as 0, "very good" as -1, "excellent" as -2, "fair" as 1, and "poor" as 2. In question 32, "about the same", the middle item, is scored as 0, "somewhat better" as -1, "much better" as -2, "somewhat worse" as 1, and "much worse" as 2. The symptoms domain score should be summed as follow: Σ(1 - 7, 9). The scales and subscales are calculated without weighting of any kind, and reported as the integer sum of the listed questionnaire items.
Norfolk QOL-DN Activities of Daily Living Domain Score Measured Over the Last 2 Weeks of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
Norfolk QOL-DN is a 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess impact of diabetic neuropathy on the quality of life of participants with diabetic neuropathy. All symptoms (1 - 7) are scored as either 1 or 0, indicating presence or absence of the symptom. With the exception of questions 31 and 32, the other items are scored according to the 5-point Likert Scale (0 - 4, "no problem" to "severe problem"). In question 31, "good", the middle item, is scored as 0, "very good" as -1, "excellent" as -2, "fair" as 1, and "poor" as 2. In question 32, "about the same", the middle item, is scored as 0, "somewhat better" as -1, "much better" as -2, "somewhat worse" as 1, and "much worse" as 2. The activities of daily living domain score should be summed as follow: Σ(12, 22, 23, 25, 26). The scales and subscales are calculated without weighting of any kind, and reported as the integer sum of the listed questionnaire items.
Norfolk QOL-DN Physical Functioning / Large Fiber Domain Score Measured Over the Last 2 Weeks of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
Norfolk QOL-DN is a 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess impact of diabetic neuropathy on the quality of life of participants with diabetic neuropathy. All symptoms (1 - 7) are scored as either 1 or 0, indicating presence or absence of the symptom. With the exception of questions 31 and 32, the other items are scored according to the 5-point Likert Scale (0 - 4, "no problem" to "severe problem"). In question 31, "good", the middle item, is scored as 0, "very good" as -1, "excellent" as -2, "fair" as 1, and "poor" as 2. In question 32, "about the same", the middle item, is scored as 0, "somewhat better" as -1, "much better" as -2, "somewhat worse" as 1, and "much worse" as 2. The physical functioning / large fiber domain score should be summed as follow: Σ(8, 11, 13 - 15, 24, 27 - 35). The scales and subscales are calculated without weighting of any kind, and reported as the integer sum of the listed questionnaire items.
Norfolk QOL-DN Small Fiber Domain Score Measured Over the Last 2 Weeks of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
Norfolk QOL-DN is a 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess impact of diabetic neuropathy on the quality of life of participants with diabetic neuropathy. All symptoms (1 - 7) are scored as either 1 or 0, indicating presence or absence of the symptom. With the exception of questions 31 and 32, the other items are scored according to the 5-point Likert Scale (0 - 4, "no problem" to "severe problem"). In question 31, "good", the middle item, is scored as 0, "very good" as -1, "excellent" as -2, "fair" as 1, and "poor" as 2. In question 32, "about the same", the middle item, is scored as 0, "somewhat better" as -1, "much better" as -2, "somewhat worse" as 1, and "much worse" as 2. The small fiber domain score should be summed as follow: Σ(10, 16, 17, 18). The scales and subscales are calculated without weighting of any kind, and reported as the integer sum of the listed questionnaire items.
Norfolk QOL-DN Autonomic Domain Score Measured Over the Last 2 Weeks of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
Norfolk QOL-DN is a 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess impact of diabetic neuropathy on the quality of life of participants with diabetic neuropathy. All symptoms (1 - 7) are scored as either 1 or 0, indicating presence or absence of the symptom. With the exception of questions 31 and 32, the other items are scored according to the 5-point Likert Scale (0 - 4, "no problem" to "severe problem"). In question 31, "good", the middle item, is scored as 0, "very good" as -1, "excellent" as -2, "fair" as 1, and "poor" as 2. In question 32, "about the same", the middle item, is scored as 0, "somewhat better" as -1, "much better" as -2, "somewhat worse" as 1, and "much worse" as 2. The autonomic domain score should be summed as follow: Σ(19, 20, 21). The scales and subscales are calculated without weighting of any kind, and reported as the integer sum of the listed questionnaire items.
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score From Baseline at the End of Period 1 (Week 6)
The PGIC is a participant-rated instrument that measures the participant's assessment of change in his/her overall status on a scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Original scores (OS; 7 different scores) and categorized scores (CS; 4 different scores) were provided. Categorized scores were very much improved (consisting of very much improved and much improved); any improvement (consisting of very much improved, much improved, and minimally improved); no change (consisting of no change); and any worsening (consisting of minimally worse, much worse, and very much worse). Due to the crossover design, PGIC was analyzed at the end of period 1 (V6).
Mean Sleep Interference Rating Score at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
The daily sleep diary consists of an 11-point numeric rating scale with which the participant rates how painful DPN pain has interfered with their sleep during the past 24 hours. Zero indicates "does not interfere with sleep" and 10 indicates "completely interferes (unable to sleep due to pain)". Self-assessment was performed daily in the evening before bedtime on a telephone via IVRS (time window for completion between 6.00 pm to midnight) after completion of the daily pain diary.
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Anxiety (HADS-A) Total Score at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a 14-item self-administered questionnaire that consists of 2 scales, one measuring anxiety (HADS-A), and the other measuring depression (HADS-D). Each subscale consists of 7 statements and the participant responds as to how each item applies to him/her over the past week on 4-point response scale. Separate scores are calculated for anxiety and depression and a score (ranging from 0 to 21) is obtained for each subscale. The higher the score, the more severe the anxiety or depression.
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Depression (HADS-D) Total Score at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
The HADS is a 14-item self-administered questionnaire that consists of 2 scales, one measuring anxiety (HADS-A), and the other measuring depression (HADS-D). Each subscale consists of 7 statements and the participant responds as to how each item applies to him/her over the past week on 4-point response scale. Separate scores are calculated for anxiety and depression and a score (ranging from 0 to 21) is obtained for each subscale. The higher the score, the more severe the anxiety or depression.
Euro QoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Scores at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
The EQ-5D describes participant's health status based on 5 attributes producing an 5 digit index score. The 5 dimensions are: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain / discomfort, and anxiety / depression. Dolan 1997 advised how to transfer this index score to a single score for clinical trials, a revised single index was published in 2001. The index uses general population weighted estimates for various health states. In general, the range of the single index tends to vary between 0 = death and 1 = perfect health and there are some states that have been rated by the general population to be worse than death which may result in numbers below 0.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01474772
First Posted
November 15, 2011
Last Updated
January 26, 2021
Sponsor
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01474772
Brief Title
Efficacy and Safety Study of Pregabalin in the Treatment of Pain on Walking in Patients With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN)
Official Title
A Phase 3b Multicenter, Double-blind, Randomized, Placebo-controlled Cross-over Efficacy And Safety Study Of Pregabalin In The Treatment Of Patients With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy And Pain On Walking
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
November 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
July 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2013 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Pfizer's Upjohn has merged with Mylan to form Viatris Inc.
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The intent of this study is to treat subjects with painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN) who also have pain on walking and to determine whether or not pregabalin demonstrates improvement relative to placebo on the following: reducing DPN pain, reducing pain on walking, and providing other benefits associated with daily activities and quality of life.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy
Keywords
Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy, Pain on Walking, Pregabalin
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
217 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Pregabain
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Pregabalin
Other Intervention Name(s)
Lyrica
Intervention Description
150-300 mg/day given in 3 divided doses as capsules
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
placebo
Intervention Description
matching placebo capsules given in 3 divided doses
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Average Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN) Pain Based on a Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Over the Last 7 Days of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
Description
The daily pain diary consisted of an 11-point numeric scale ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst possible pain"). Participants described their pain during the past 24 hours by having chosen the appropriate number between 0 and 10. Self-assessment was performed daily each evening before bedtime (6.00 pm to midnight) on the telephone via Interactive Voice Recognition System (IVRS). The endpoint mean pain score was defined as the mean of the last 7 daily diary pain ratings while taking study medication in each treatment period - Period 1 and Period 2, respectively. A rating of 1 - 3 was considered as mild pain; 4 - 6 as moderate pain; and 7 - 10 as severe pain.
Time Frame
End of Period (includes both Visits 6 and 11)
Title
DPN Pain on Walking Based on a 11-point NRS of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
Description
The post-test DPN pain on walking NRS consisted of an 11-point numeric scale ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst possible pain"). Participants described their DPN pain in their legs and/or feet while walking during the 50-foot walk test by choosing the appropriate number between 0 and 10. The post-test DPN pain on walking NRS was completed by the participant using paper-pen administration immediately after completing the 50-foot walk test at the end of each treatment period - Period 1 and Period 2, respectively. A rating of 1 - 3 was considered as mild pain; 4 - 6 as moderate pain; and 7 - 10 as severe pain.
Time Frame
End of Period (includes both Visits 6 and 11)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving 30% Reduction in Mean DPN Pain Score From Baseline at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
Description
The daily pain diary consisted of an 11-point numeric scale ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst possible pain"). Participants described their pain during the past 24 hours by having chosen the appropriate number between 0 and 10. Self-assessment was performed daily each evening before bedtime (6.00 pm to midnight) on the telephone via IVRS. The endpoint mean pain score was defined as the mean of the last 7 daily diary pain ratings while taking study medication in each treatment period - Period 1 and Period 2, respectively. A rating of 1 - 3 was considered as mild pain; 4 - 6 as moderate pain; and 7 - 10 as severe pain.
Time Frame
End of Period (includes both Visits 6 and 11)
Title
Percentage of Participants Achieving 50% Reduction in Mean DPN Pain Score From Baseline at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
Description
The daily pain diary consisted of an 11-point numeric scale ranging from 0 ("no pain") to 10 ("worst possible pain"). Participants described their pain during the past 24 hours by having chosen the appropriate number between 0 and 10. Self-assessment was performed daily each evening before bedtime (6.00 pm to midnight) on the telephone via IVRS. The endpoint mean pain score was defined as the mean of the last 7 daily diary pain ratings while taking study medication in each treatment period - Period 1 and Period 2, respectively. A rating of 1 - 3 was considered as mild pain; 4 - 6 as moderate pain; and 7 - 10 as severe pain.
Time Frame
End of Period (includes both Visits 6 and 11)
Title
Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-sf) Score for Pain-Severity Domain at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
Description
The BPI-sf is a self-administered questionnaire developed to assess the severity of pain and the impact of pain on daily functions during a 24 hour period prior to evaluation. The BPI-sf consists of 5 questions: 4 items measure pain (0: no pain; 10: worst pain possible) at its "worst, "least", "average", and "now" (current pain) on an 11-point scale. Scores range from 0 - 40 with higher scores indicating greater pain severity. Another item, containing 7 sub-questions, evaluates the level of interference of pain on daily functioning (general activity, walking, work ability, mood, enjoyment of life, relations with other people, and sleep) on 11-point scales (0: does not interfere; 10: completely interferes). Scores range from 0 - 70 with higher scores indicating greater interference.
Time Frame
End of Period (includes both Visits 6 and 11)
Title
BPI-sf Score for Pain-Interference Domain at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
Description
The BPI-sf is a self-administered questionnaire developed to assess the severity of pain and the impact of pain on daily functions during a 24 hour period prior to evaluation. The BPI-sf consists of 5 questions: 4 items measure pain (0: no pain; 10: worst pain possible) at its "worst, "least", "average", and "now" (current pain) on an 11-point scale. Scores range from 0 - 40 with higher scores indicating greater pain severity. Another item, containing 7 sub-questions, evaluates the level of interference of pain on daily functioning (general activity, walking, work ability, mood, enjoyment of life, relations with other people, and sleep) on 11-point scales (0: does not interfere; 10: completely interferes). Scores range from 0 - 70 with higher scores indicating greater interference.
Time Frame
End of Period (includes both Visits 6 and 11)
Title
BPI-sf Score for Pain-Interference With Walking Ability at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
Description
The BPI-sf is a self-administered questionnaire developed to assess the severity of pain and the impact of pain on daily functions during a 24 hour period prior to evaluation. The BPI-sf consists of 5 questions: 4 items measure pain on an 11-point scale. Scores range from 0 - 40 with higher scores indicating greater pain severity. Another item, containing 7 sub-questions, evaluates the level of interference of pain on daily functioning (general activity, walking, work ability, mood, enjoyment of life, relations with other people, and sleep) on 11-point scales (0: does not interfere; 10: completely interferes). Scores range from 0 - 70 with higher scores indicating greater interference. The sub-score pain interference with walking ability was evaluated, as it was considered to be the most relevant in the context of this study.
Time Frame
End of Period (includes both Visits 6 and 11)
Title
Daytime Total Activity Counts Per Day Measured by Actigraphy Over the Last 7 Days of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
Description
Actigraphy data which measured steps and daytime activity during waking hours were assessed for the last 7 days at Baseline, Visit 6, and Visit 11. Activity counts are the units of motion. It is equal to the sum of peak accelerations each second during the epoch (60 seconds). Total activity counts per day is the sum of the activity counts for each epoch (60 seconds) during the "day" (non-sleep period). Actigraphy was performed with an accelerometer that was worn on the hip during the waking hours. It was programmed to record movements while the device was being worn.
Time Frame
End of Period (includes both Visits 6 and 11)
Title
Steps Per Day Measured by Actigraphy Over the Last 7 Days of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
Description
Actigraphy data which measured steps and daytime activity during waking hours were assessed for the last 7 days at Baseline, Visit 6, and Visit 11. The participants were instructed to wear the device on their hip during the waking hours.
Time Frame
End of Period (includes both Visits 6 and 11)
Title
Walk 12 Questionnaire Over the Last 2 Weeks of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
Description
The Walk-12 is a self-administered questionnaire that assesses the impact of the participant's diabetic neuropathy over the past 2 weeks on parameters associated with walking (12 questions) based on a 5-point scale (from not at all to extremely). The total score is the sum of scores from the 12 questions, which then gets transferred to a 0-100 scale with higher scores indicating greater impairment
Time Frame
End of Period (includes both Visits 6 and 11)
Title
Norfolk Quality of Life-Diabetic Neuropathy (Norfolk QOL-DN) Total Quality of Life (TQOL) Score Measured Over the Last 2 Weeks of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
Description
Norfolk QOL-DN is a 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess impact of diabetic neuropathy on the quality of life of participants with diabetic neuropathy. All symptoms (1 - 7) are scored as either 1 or 0, indicating presence or absence of the symptom. With the exception of questions 31 and 32, the other items are scored according to the 5-point Likert Scale (0 - 4, "no problem" to "severe problem"). In question 31, "good", the middle item, is scored as 0, "very good" as -1, "excellent" as -2, "fair" as 1, and "poor" as 2. In question 32, "about the same", the middle item, is scored as 0, "somewhat better" as -1, "much better" as -2, "somewhat worse" as 1, and "much worse" as 2. TQOL score should be summed as follow: sum (Σ) (1 - 7, 8 - 35). The scales and subscales are calculated without weighting of any kind, and reported as the integer sum of the listed questionnaire items.
Time Frame
End of Period (includes both Visits 6 and 11)
Title
Norfolk QOL-DN Symptoms Domain Score Measured Over the Last 2 Weeks of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
Description
Norfolk QOL-DN is a 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess impact of diabetic neuropathy on the quality of life of participants with diabetic neuropathy. All symptoms (1 - 7) are scored as either 1 or 0, indicating presence or absence of the symptom. With the exception of questions 31 and 32, the other items are scored according to the 5-point Likert Scale (0 - 4, "no problem" to "severe problem"). In question 31, "good", the middle item, is scored as 0, "very good" as -1, "excellent" as -2, "fair" as 1, and "poor" as 2. In question 32, "about the same", the middle item, is scored as 0, "somewhat better" as -1, "much better" as -2, "somewhat worse" as 1, and "much worse" as 2. The symptoms domain score should be summed as follow: Σ(1 - 7, 9). The scales and subscales are calculated without weighting of any kind, and reported as the integer sum of the listed questionnaire items.
Time Frame
End of Period (includes both Visits 6 and 11)
Title
Norfolk QOL-DN Activities of Daily Living Domain Score Measured Over the Last 2 Weeks of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
Description
Norfolk QOL-DN is a 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess impact of diabetic neuropathy on the quality of life of participants with diabetic neuropathy. All symptoms (1 - 7) are scored as either 1 or 0, indicating presence or absence of the symptom. With the exception of questions 31 and 32, the other items are scored according to the 5-point Likert Scale (0 - 4, "no problem" to "severe problem"). In question 31, "good", the middle item, is scored as 0, "very good" as -1, "excellent" as -2, "fair" as 1, and "poor" as 2. In question 32, "about the same", the middle item, is scored as 0, "somewhat better" as -1, "much better" as -2, "somewhat worse" as 1, and "much worse" as 2. The activities of daily living domain score should be summed as follow: Σ(12, 22, 23, 25, 26). The scales and subscales are calculated without weighting of any kind, and reported as the integer sum of the listed questionnaire items.
Time Frame
End of Period (includes both Visits 6 and 11)
Title
Norfolk QOL-DN Physical Functioning / Large Fiber Domain Score Measured Over the Last 2 Weeks of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
Description
Norfolk QOL-DN is a 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess impact of diabetic neuropathy on the quality of life of participants with diabetic neuropathy. All symptoms (1 - 7) are scored as either 1 or 0, indicating presence or absence of the symptom. With the exception of questions 31 and 32, the other items are scored according to the 5-point Likert Scale (0 - 4, "no problem" to "severe problem"). In question 31, "good", the middle item, is scored as 0, "very good" as -1, "excellent" as -2, "fair" as 1, and "poor" as 2. In question 32, "about the same", the middle item, is scored as 0, "somewhat better" as -1, "much better" as -2, "somewhat worse" as 1, and "much worse" as 2. The physical functioning / large fiber domain score should be summed as follow: Σ(8, 11, 13 - 15, 24, 27 - 35). The scales and subscales are calculated without weighting of any kind, and reported as the integer sum of the listed questionnaire items.
Time Frame
End of Period (includes both Visits 6 and 11)
Title
Norfolk QOL-DN Small Fiber Domain Score Measured Over the Last 2 Weeks of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
Description
Norfolk QOL-DN is a 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess impact of diabetic neuropathy on the quality of life of participants with diabetic neuropathy. All symptoms (1 - 7) are scored as either 1 or 0, indicating presence or absence of the symptom. With the exception of questions 31 and 32, the other items are scored according to the 5-point Likert Scale (0 - 4, "no problem" to "severe problem"). In question 31, "good", the middle item, is scored as 0, "very good" as -1, "excellent" as -2, "fair" as 1, and "poor" as 2. In question 32, "about the same", the middle item, is scored as 0, "somewhat better" as -1, "much better" as -2, "somewhat worse" as 1, and "much worse" as 2. The small fiber domain score should be summed as follow: Σ(10, 16, 17, 18). The scales and subscales are calculated without weighting of any kind, and reported as the integer sum of the listed questionnaire items.
Time Frame
End of Period (includes both Visits 6 and 11)
Title
Norfolk QOL-DN Autonomic Domain Score Measured Over the Last 2 Weeks of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
Description
Norfolk QOL-DN is a 35-item participant-rated questionnaire used to assess impact of diabetic neuropathy on the quality of life of participants with diabetic neuropathy. All symptoms (1 - 7) are scored as either 1 or 0, indicating presence or absence of the symptom. With the exception of questions 31 and 32, the other items are scored according to the 5-point Likert Scale (0 - 4, "no problem" to "severe problem"). In question 31, "good", the middle item, is scored as 0, "very good" as -1, "excellent" as -2, "fair" as 1, and "poor" as 2. In question 32, "about the same", the middle item, is scored as 0, "somewhat better" as -1, "much better" as -2, "somewhat worse" as 1, and "much worse" as 2. The autonomic domain score should be summed as follow: Σ(19, 20, 21). The scales and subscales are calculated without weighting of any kind, and reported as the integer sum of the listed questionnaire items.
Time Frame
End of Period (includes both Visits 6 and 11)
Title
Percentage of Participants With Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) Score From Baseline at the End of Period 1 (Week 6)
Description
The PGIC is a participant-rated instrument that measures the participant's assessment of change in his/her overall status on a scale ranging from 1 (very much improved) to 7 (very much worse). Original scores (OS; 7 different scores) and categorized scores (CS; 4 different scores) were provided. Categorized scores were very much improved (consisting of very much improved and much improved); any improvement (consisting of very much improved, much improved, and minimally improved); no change (consisting of no change); and any worsening (consisting of minimally worse, much worse, and very much worse). Due to the crossover design, PGIC was analyzed at the end of period 1 (V6).
Time Frame
End of Period 1 (V6)
Title
Mean Sleep Interference Rating Score at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
Description
The daily sleep diary consists of an 11-point numeric rating scale with which the participant rates how painful DPN pain has interfered with their sleep during the past 24 hours. Zero indicates "does not interfere with sleep" and 10 indicates "completely interferes (unable to sleep due to pain)". Self-assessment was performed daily in the evening before bedtime on a telephone via IVRS (time window for completion between 6.00 pm to midnight) after completion of the daily pain diary.
Time Frame
End of Period (includes both Visits 6 and 11)
Title
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Anxiety (HADS-A) Total Score at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
Description
The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a 14-item self-administered questionnaire that consists of 2 scales, one measuring anxiety (HADS-A), and the other measuring depression (HADS-D). Each subscale consists of 7 statements and the participant responds as to how each item applies to him/her over the past week on 4-point response scale. Separate scores are calculated for anxiety and depression and a score (ranging from 0 to 21) is obtained for each subscale. The higher the score, the more severe the anxiety or depression.
Time Frame
End of Period (includes both Visits 6 and 11)
Title
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Depression (HADS-D) Total Score at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
Description
The HADS is a 14-item self-administered questionnaire that consists of 2 scales, one measuring anxiety (HADS-A), and the other measuring depression (HADS-D). Each subscale consists of 7 statements and the participant responds as to how each item applies to him/her over the past week on 4-point response scale. Separate scores are calculated for anxiety and depression and a score (ranging from 0 to 21) is obtained for each subscale. The higher the score, the more severe the anxiety or depression.
Time Frame
End of Period (includes both Visits 6 and 11)
Title
Euro QoL-5 Dimensions (EQ-5D) - Health State Profile Utility Scores at the End of Each Treatment Period (Week 6 of Each Treatment Period)
Description
The EQ-5D describes participant's health status based on 5 attributes producing an 5 digit index score. The 5 dimensions are: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain / discomfort, and anxiety / depression. Dolan 1997 advised how to transfer this index score to a single score for clinical trials, a revised single index was published in 2001. The index uses general population weighted estimates for various health states. In general, the range of the single index tends to vary between 0 = death and 1 = perfect health and there are some states that have been rated by the general population to be worse than death which may result in numbers below 0.
Time Frame
End of Period (includes both Visits 6 and 11)
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Men or women who are at least 18 years old.
Diagnosis of painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
Pain on walking.
Exclusion Criteria:
Inability to walk 50 feet on a flat surface.
Pain on walking due to conditions other than diabetic peripheral neuropathy.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pfizer CT.gov Call Center
Organizational Affiliation
Pfizer
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Dedicated Clinical Research
City
Goodyear
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85395
Country
United States
Facility Name
Arizona Research Center
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85023
Country
United States
Facility Name
Neuro-Pain Medical Center
City
Fresno
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
93710
Country
United States
Facility Name
HealthCare Partners Medical Group
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90015
Country
United States
Facility Name
IDS Pharmacy
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90033
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Southern California
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90033
Country
United States
Facility Name
PAB Clinical Research
City
Brandon
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33511
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pulmonary Associates of Brandon
City
Brandon
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33511
Country
United States
Facility Name
Innovative Research of West Florida, Inc.
City
Clearwater
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33756
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Office of Laszlo Jozef Mate, MD
City
North Palm Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33408
Country
United States
Facility Name
Meridien Research
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33606
Country
United States
Facility Name
Metabolic Research Institute, Inc.
City
West Palm Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33401
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Research of Central Florida
City
Winter Haven
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33880
Country
United States
Facility Name
Columbus Research Foundation
City
Columbus
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
31904
Country
United States
Facility Name
MediSphere Medical Research Center, LLC
City
Evansville
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
47714
Country
United States
Facility Name
Heartland Research Associates, LLC
City
Wichita
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
67205
Country
United States
Facility Name
Quality Clinical Research, Inc.
City
Omaha
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68114
Country
United States
Facility Name
Desert Endocrinology Clinical Research Center
City
Henderson
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89052
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Research Consortium
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89119
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Office of Dr. Stephen H. Miller, MD
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89144
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Medical Research Network, LLC
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10128
Country
United States
Facility Name
Neurology and Neuroscience Center of Ohio
City
Toledo
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43623
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sooner Clinical Research
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73112
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Office of Veronique Sebastian, MD
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73120
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sunstone Medical Research, LLC
City
Medford
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97504
Country
United States
Facility Name
Oregon Health and Science University - Comprehensive Pain Center
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97239
Country
United States
Facility Name
Oregon Health and Science University - Department of Anesthesiology and Perioperative Medicine
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97239
Country
United States
Facility Name
Blair Orthopedic Associates, Inc.
City
Altoona
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
16602
Country
United States
Facility Name
Altoona Center for Clinical Research
City
Duncansville
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
16635
Country
United States
Facility Name
Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island
City
Pawtucket
State/Province
Rhode Island
ZIP/Postal Code
02860
Country
United States
Facility Name
Neurology and Pain Clinic, LLC
City
Orangeburg
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29118
Country
United States
Facility Name
Houston Neurocare
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Centex Research, Inc.
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77062
Country
United States
Facility Name
Eastern Virginia Medical School
City
Norfolk
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23507
Country
United States
Facility Name
Privatni specializovana ambulance pro neurologii a detskou neurologii
City
Brno-Bystrc
ZIP/Postal Code
635 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Clintrial, s.r.o.
City
Praha 10
ZIP/Postal Code
100 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Fakultni nemocnice v Motole
City
Praha 5
ZIP/Postal Code
150 06
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Dr DR Lakha's Practice
City
Johannesburg
State/Province
Gauteng
ZIP/Postal Code
1829
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Dr Hemant Makan (Private Practice)
City
Lenasia
State/Province
Gauteng
ZIP/Postal Code
1820
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Randles Road Medical Centre
City
Durban
State/Province
Kwa-Zulu Natal
ZIP/Postal Code
4000
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Richards Bay Trial Centre
City
Richards Bay
ZIP/Postal Code
3900
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Forskningsmottagningen Gamla Sjukhuset i Falkoping
City
Falkoping
ZIP/Postal Code
521 43
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Center for Lakemedelsstudier
City
Malmo
ZIP/Postal Code
211 52
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Citydiabetes
City
Stockholm
ZIP/Postal Code
111 57
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Bragee Medect AB
City
Stockholm
ZIP/Postal Code
115 22
Country
Sweden
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25565583
Citation
Huffman C, Stacey BR, Tuchman M, Burbridge C, Li C, Parsons B, Pauer L, Scavone JM, Behar R, Yurkewicz L. Efficacy and Safety of Pregabalin in the Treatment of Patients With Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy and Pain on Walking. Clin J Pain. 2015 Nov;31(11):946-58. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000000198.
Results Reference
derived
Links:
URL
https://trialinfoemail.pfizer.com/pages/landing.aspx?StudyID=A0081269&StudyName=Efficacy%20and%20Safety%20Study%20of%20Pregabalin%20in%20the%20Treatment%20of%20Pain%20on%20Walking%20in%20Patients%20with%20Diabetic%20Peripheral%20Neuropathy%20%28DPN%29
Description
To obtain contact information for a study center near you, click here.
Learn more about this trial
Efficacy and Safety Study of Pregabalin in the Treatment of Pain on Walking in Patients With Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy (DPN)
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs