search
Back to results

Comparison of Two Needles (ProCore vs EchoTip) for the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Solid Mass Under EUS (PICORE)

Primary Purpose

Pancreatic Tumor, Fine Needle Aspiration, Endoscopic Ultrasonography

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Puncture with fine needle aspiration under endoscopic ultrasonographic control
Sponsored by
VANBIERVLIET
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Pancreatic Tumor

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Solid tumor of the pancreas (<50% share or anechoic fluid) to receive a biopsy under endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Contraindications to the achievement of an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy
  • Haemorrhagic disease, disorder of hemostasis and coagulation (PT <60%, CaT> 40 sec. and platelets <60000/mm3)
  • Pancreatic cystic mass (fluid quota valued at more than 50% of the mass lesion on imaging)
  • Pregnant or lactating

Sites / Locations

  • Hôpital L'Archet 2, CHU Nice, BP 3079

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

EchoTip HD ProCore 22 Gauge

Echo Tip 22 Gauge

Arm Description

first passage in the pancreatic tumor with the EchoTip HD ProCore 22 Gauge then with the EchoTip 22 Gauge

First passage through the tumor with the EchoTip 22 Gauge then with Echotip HD ProCore 22 Gauge

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration Echo Tip® HD ProCore™ versus EchoTip® in the etiological cyto histological in pancreatic solid tumors explored under endoscopy ultrasonography.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Immediate morbidity per procedure of both techniques and delayed morbidity (up to D30) of the complete procedure (corresponding to all of the discussion with the punctures of 2 needles).
Adverse effects (%, number of event for each needle passage) during the procedure or during the follow up period (30 days)
Quality of histological specimen obtained with the 2 needles
Visual analogic scale and Maier score used for this point
Dysfunction in two type of needle biopsy
failure or difficulty reports with each needle (%)
ease of puncture between the 2 types of equipment.
Visual analogic scale

Full Information

First Posted
October 20, 2011
Last Updated
April 22, 2014
Sponsor
VANBIERVLIET
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01479803
Brief Title
Comparison of Two Needles (ProCore vs EchoTip) for the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Solid Mass Under EUS
Acronym
PICORE
Official Title
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF DIAGNOSTIC VALUE FOR THE ECHOTIP® PROCORE™ 22 Gauge NEEDLE VERSUS ECHOTIP® 22 Gauge IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF PANCREATIC SOLID TUMORS UNDER ENDOSCOPIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY : THE "PICORE" STUDY
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
October 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 2012 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
VANBIERVLIET

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The negative predictive value of fine needle aspiration under ultrasound endoscopy (EUS) for the diagnostic of solid pancreatic masses is 70% on average in the current literature with 22 gauge needles. There is a wide variability of this rate across studies (from 38 to 92%). In case of negativity of the biopsy, the risk of missing a pancreatic cancer whose prognosis is severe and extensive treatment, remains important. To improve the sensitivity of EUS echo endoscopy, several methods were used. A new needle (Echo Tip ® HD ProCore ™) has received CE Mark in the field of EUS. This instrument combines the comfortable and handy size of 22 Gauge and innovative design (window lateralized bevel) with in vitro studies obtaining core biopsy. In addition, a single pass through the tumor is achieved with this hand against several (2-3 minimum) with the current hardware. The theoretical goal is to have a tissue material more abundant during the sampling, without increasing morbidity and increase the diagnostic accuracy. A preliminary prospective study with this material has shown interesting results (increase the diagnostic accuracy of 15%). To determine the diagnostic gain with this new hand, it seemed essential to propose a prospective comparative study (22 gauge needle ProCore ™ versus the old EchoTip ® 22-Gauge) randomized (randomization of the order of the needles) in crossover (on the same lesion) in samples of pancreatic solid tumors. The caliber of 22 gauge is the gauge most often used for punctures under ultrasound endoscopy, resulting in less morbidity. Puncture by the 2 needles on the same injury can limit the effect of variability between patients and thereby have a better power for the investigators study without increasing the risk of complications (the needle ProCore ™ does not require that one pass through the tumor). The study of pancreatic solid tumors is one that poses the biggest diagnostic problem still present in the investigators daily practice. The aim of this study is to compare the diagnostic accuracy of the needle ProCore™ versus EchoTip® in etiological cyto histological diagnostic for pancreatic solid tumors under EUS.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pancreatic Tumor, Fine Needle Aspiration, Endoscopic Ultrasonography

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
80 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
EchoTip HD ProCore 22 Gauge
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
first passage in the pancreatic tumor with the EchoTip HD ProCore 22 Gauge then with the EchoTip 22 Gauge
Arm Title
Echo Tip 22 Gauge
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
First passage through the tumor with the EchoTip 22 Gauge then with Echotip HD ProCore 22 Gauge
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Puncture with fine needle aspiration under endoscopic ultrasonographic control
Intervention Description
Puncture of the pancreatic solid mass with fine needle aspiration under endoscopic ultrasonographic control Passage in the same pancreatic mass of first EchoTip HD Procore then EchoTip 22 Gauge or vice versa according to the randomization
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Diagnostic accuracy of fine needle aspiration Echo Tip® HD ProCore™ versus EchoTip® in the etiological cyto histological in pancreatic solid tumors explored under endoscopy ultrasonography.
Time Frame
6 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Immediate morbidity per procedure of both techniques and delayed morbidity (up to D30) of the complete procedure (corresponding to all of the discussion with the punctures of 2 needles).
Description
Adverse effects (%, number of event for each needle passage) during the procedure or during the follow up period (30 days)
Time Frame
2 minutes and 30 days
Title
Quality of histological specimen obtained with the 2 needles
Description
Visual analogic scale and Maier score used for this point
Time Frame
10 days
Title
Dysfunction in two type of needle biopsy
Description
failure or difficulty reports with each needle (%)
Time Frame
Day one
Title
ease of puncture between the 2 types of equipment.
Description
Visual analogic scale
Time Frame
day one

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Solid tumor of the pancreas (<50% share or anechoic fluid) to receive a biopsy under endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) Exclusion Criteria: Contraindications to the achievement of an upper gastrointestinal endoscopy Haemorrhagic disease, disorder of hemostasis and coagulation (PT <60%, CaT> 40 sec. and platelets <60000/mm3) Pancreatic cystic mass (fluid quota valued at more than 50% of the mass lesion on imaging) Pregnant or lactating
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hôpital L'Archet 2, CHU Nice, BP 3079
City
Nice Cedex 3
ZIP/Postal Code
06202
Country
France

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25098612
Citation
Vanbiervliet G, Napoleon B, Saint Paul MC, Sakarovitch C, Wangermez M, Bichard P, Subtil C, Koch S, Grandval P, Gincul R, Karsenti D, Heyries L, Duchmann JC, Bourgaux JF, Levy M, Calament G, Fumex F, Pujol B, Lefort C, Poincloux L, Pagenault M, Bonin EA, Fabre M, Barthet M. Core needle versus standard needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided biopsy of solid pancreatic masses: a randomized crossover study. Endoscopy. 2014 Dec;46(12):1063-70. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1377559. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Comparison of Two Needles (ProCore vs EchoTip) for the Diagnosis of Pancreatic Solid Mass Under EUS

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs