search
Back to results

Study of Ipatasertib or Apitolisib With Abiraterone Acetate Versus Abiraterone Acetate in Participants With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Previously Treated With Docetaxel Chemotherapy

Primary Purpose

Prostate Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Abiraterone
Apitolisib
Ipatasertib
Placebo
Prednisone
Prednisolone
Sponsored by
Genentech, Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Prostate Cancer

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)MaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically confirmed metastatic or advanced prostate adenocarcinoma that has been previously treated with docetaxel-based therapy and has progressed during treatment of at least one hormonal therapy(prior docetaxel is not required for the safety cohort)
  • Two rising PSA levels greater than or equal to (>/=) 2 ng/mL measured >/= 1 week apart or radiographic evidence of disease progression in soft tissue or bone
  • Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 at screening
  • Adequate hematologic and organ function
  • Documented willingness to use an effective means of contraception
  • Safety cohort only: agreement to use CGM for first cycle of treatment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of Type I or Type II diabetes mellitus requiring insulin; safety cohort: patients who are receiving any pharmacologic treatment for diabetes are not eligible
  • New York Heart Association Class III or IV heart failure or Left ventricular ejection fraction < 50% or ventricular arrhythmia requiring medication
  • Significant atherosclerotic disease, as evidenced by: unstable angina, history of myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to Day 1, or cerebrovascular accident within 6 months prior to Day 1
  • Active autoimmune disease that is not controlled by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or active inflammatory disease which requires immunosuppressive therapy
  • Clinically significant history of liver disease
  • History of adrenal insufficiency or hyperaldosteronism
  • Phase II only: Previous therapy for prostate cancer with 17 alpha-hydroxylase/C17,20-lyase inhibitors, including abiraterone
  • Phase II only: Previous treatment for prostate cancer with Protein kinase B phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase and/or mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors
  • Need for chronic corticosteroid therapy of >/= 20 mg of prednisone per day or an equivalent dose of other anti inflammatory corticosteroids or immunosuppressant

Sites / Locations

  • HonorHealth Research Institute ? Bisgrove
  • Pacific Hematology Oncology Associates
  • Florida Cancer Specialists - Fort Myers (New Hampshire Ct)
  • Florida Cancer Specialists; Sarasota
  • Kaiser Permanente Medical Ctr
  • Johns Hopkins Univ; Bunting Blaustein Cancer Center
  • Karmanos Cancer Institute
  • Urology Cancer Center & GU Research Network
  • New York Cancer and Blood Specialists - Setauket Medical Oncology
  • Weill Cornell Medical College
  • Carolina Urologic Research Center
  • Sarah Cannon Cancer Center - Tennessee Oncology, Pllc
  • Masarykuv onkologicky ustav
  • Fakultni nemocnice Hradec Kralove; I. interni klinika,Oddeleni invazivni kardiologie
  • Urocentrum Praha s.r.o.
  • Vseobecna fakultni nemocnice v Praze
  • Fakultni Thomayerova Nemocnice; Revmatologicke Oddeleni
  • ICO Paul Papin; Oncologie Medicale.
  • Centre Léon Bérard - Centre régional de lutte contre le cancer Rhône-Alpes
  • Hia Du Val De Grace
  • Institut Curie; Oncologie Medicale
  • GH Paris Saint Joseph; Hopital De Jour Oncologie
  • Hopital d'Instruction des Armees de Begin
  • Institut Gustave Roussy; Departement Oncologie Medicale
  • Alexandras Hospital; Dept. of Clin. Therapeutics, Athens Uni School of Medicine
  • Univ General Hosp Heraklion; Medical Oncology
  • University Hospital of Larissa; Oncology
  • University Hospital of Patras Medical Oncology
  • Metropolitan Hospital; 2Nd Oncology Clinic
  • IRST Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo Per Lo Studio E Cura Dei Tumori, Sede Meldola; Oncologia Medica
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Istituti Ospitalieri
  • Irccs Ospedale San Raffaele;Oncologia Medica
  • Irccs Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori (Int);S.C. Medicina Oncologica 2
  • Ospedale S. Donato; Divisione Di Reumatologia
  • Het Nederlands Kanker Inst
  • Vu Medisch Centrum; Afdeling Longziekten
  • MC Haaglanden; Oncologie
  • UMC St Radboud
  • Sint Franciscus Gasthuis; Inwendige Geneeskunde
  • Sf. Constantin Hospital; Oncology
  • Prof. Dr. Th. Burghele Clin Urology Hosp
  • Prof. Dr. I. Chiricuta Institute of Oncology
  • ONCOMED - Medical Centre
  • Municipal Hosp Turdal; Oncology
  • Hospital General Universitario de Elche; Servicio de Oncologia
  • Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol; Servicio de Oncologia
  • Corporacio Sanitaria Parc Tauli; Servicio de Oncologia
  • Hospital Univ Vall d'Hebron; Servicio de Oncologia
  • Clinica Universitaria de Navarra
  • Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon
  • Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre; Servicio de Oncologia
  • Hospital Madrid Norte Sanchinarro
  • Hospital Clinico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria
  • Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Centre for Clinical Haematology
  • Gartnavel General Hospital
  • St. James University Hospital; Pharmacy Department
  • The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust
  • Sarah Cannon Research Institute
  • The Royal Marsden Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm 5

Arm 6

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Phase Ib: Ipatasertib 400 mg + abiraterone

Phase Ib: Apitolisib 30 mg + abiraterone

Phase II: Ipatasertib 400 mg + abiraterone

Phase II: Ipatasertib 200 mg + abiraterone

Phase II: Placebo + abiraterone

Safety Cohort: Ipataseritib 400 mg + Abiraterone + Prednisone

Arm Description

Participants will receive ipatasertib 400 mg once daily, abiraterone 1000 mg once daily, and prednisone/prednisolone 5 mg twice daily (bid) continuously in 28-day treatment cycles until disease progression or intolerable toxicity.

Participants will receive apitolisib 30 mg once daily, abiraterone 1000 mg once daily, and prednisone/prednisolone 5 mg twice daily (bid) continuously in 28-day treatment cycles until disease progression or intolerable toxicity.

Participants will receive Ipatasertib 400 mg once daily, abiraterone 1000 mg once daily, and prednisone/prednisolone 5 mg bid continuously in 28-day treatment cycles until disease progression or intolerable toxicity.

Participants will receive Ipatasertib 200 mg once daily, abiraterone 1000 mg once daily, and prednisone/prednisolone 5 mg bid continuously in 28-day treatment cycles until disease progression or intolerable toxicity.

Participants will receive placebo (for Ipatasertib) once daily, abiraterone 1000 mg once daily, and prednisone/prednisolone 5 mg bid continuously in 28-day treatment cycles until disease progression or intolerable toxicity.

Participants will receive ipatasertib 400 mg orally once daily and/or prednisone/prednisolone 5 mg orally once daily or bid and/or abiraterone 1000 mg orally once daily according to the following schedule: ipatasertib in the morning during Cycle 1, Days 1-7; ipatasertib in the morning plus prednisone/prednisolone once at night during Cycle 1, Day 8; ipatasertib in the morning plus prednisone/prednisolone bid (morning and night) during Cycle 1, Days 9-11; ipatasertib in the morning plus prednisone/prednisolone bid (morning and night) and abiraterone in the morning during Cycle 1, Days 12-18; ipatasertib in the evening plus prednisone/prednisolone bid (morning and night) and abiraterone at the same time as ipatasertib during Cycle 1, Days 19-25; Cycle 2 and beyond ipatasertib once daily in the morning or evening, abiraterone at the same time as ipatasertib, and prednisone/prednisolone bid.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Phase Ib: Percentage of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
DLT: 1 of the following toxicities, at least possibly related to ipatasertib or apitolisib. 1) Grade ≥ 3 non-hematologic, non-hepatic major organ AE; 2) Grade ≥ 3 febrile neutropenia; 3) Grade ≥ 4 neutropenia (absolute neutrophils less than [<] 500 per microliter) lasting greater than (>) 7 days; 4) Grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia associated with acute hemorrhage; 5) Grade ≥4 thrombocytopenia; 6) Grade ≥4 anemia; 7) 1 episode of fasting Grade ≥4 hyperglycemia or 3 episodes of fasting Grade 3 hyperglycemia on separate days within 7 days, as determined by laboratory blood glucose evaluation; 8) Grade ≥3 elevation lasting for > 48 hours for hepatic transaminase or liver-specific alkaline phosphatase or total bilirubin. Adverse events were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 4.0.
Phase Ib: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
An Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.
Phase Ib: Recommended Phase II Dose (RP2D) of Ipatasertib and Apitolisib
RP2D is a dose of a drug which would be used in Phase II stage of the study. RP2D was to be determined based on maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in Phase Ib stage of the study. The highest dose level (in 3+3 escalation scheme) with an acceptable safety profile and with a minimum of 6 participants at which fewer than one-third of participants experienced a DLT was declared the MTD and RP2D.
Phase II: Radiographic Progression Free Survival (rPFS) (Intent-To-Treat [ITT] Population)
rPFS: Time from randomization to the first occurrence of disease progression, as determined by investigator review of tumor assessments via CT scan and bone scans, or death on study from any cause, whichever occurred first. Progression was defined as follows: Soft tissue mass (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] 1.1): at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions compared to smallest sum of diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm, progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions. Bone: ≥ 2 new bone lesions plus 2 additional at confirmation on a second bone scan ≥ 4 weeks later (< 12 weeks after randomization). ≥ 2 new bone lesions consistent with progression, without need for confirmatory bone scan (≥ 12 weeks after randomization).
Phase II: rPFS in Participants With Institute of Cancer Research (ICR) Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog (PTEN) Loss
rPFS: Time from randomization to the first occurrence of disease progression, as determined by investigator review of tumor assessments via CT scan and bone scans, or death on study from any cause, whichever occurred first. Progression was defined as follows: Soft tissue mass (RECIST 1.1): at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions compared to smallest sum of diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm, progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions. Bone: ≥ 2 new bone lesions plus 2 additional at confirmation on 2nd bone scan ≥ 4 weeks later (< 12 weeks after randomization). ≥ 2 new bone lesions consistent with progression, without need for confirmatory bone scan (≥ 12 weeks after randomization). PTEN status was assessed by RUO IHC assay that was performed at ICR, UK. Samples with 100% of the tumor with no PTEN staining were classified as "ICR PTEN loss". Number of participants analyzed=participants with PTEN loss.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Phase Ib: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Ipatasertib When Co-Administered With Abiraterone
Phase Ib: Time to Cmax (Tmax) of Ipatasertib When Co-Administered With Abiraterone
Phase Ib: Area Under The Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours (AUC0-24) of Ipatasertib When Co-Administered With Abiraterone
Phase Ib: Total Body Clearance (CL/F) of Ipatasertib When Co-Administered With Abiraterone
Clearance of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. Clearance obtained after oral dose is influenced by the fraction of the dose absorbed. Drug clearance is a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance is removed from the blood.
Phase Ib: Accumulation Ratio of Ipatasertib When Co-Administered With Abiraterone
Accumulation Ratio was calculated as AUC0-24 (Cycle 1 Day 15) divided by AUC0-24 (Cycle 1 Day 1).
Phase Ib: Cmax of G-037720 (Metabolite of Ipatasertib)
G-037220 is N-dealkylated metabolite of ipatasertib and the main metabolite in circulation.
Phase Ib: Tmax of G-037720 (Metabolite of Ipatasertib)
G-037220 is N-dealkylated metabolite of ipatasertib and the main metabolite in circulation.
Phase Ib: AUC0-24 of G-037720 (Metabolite of Ipatasertib)
G-037220 is N-dealkylated metabolite of ipatasertib and the main metabolite in circulation.
Phase Ib: Accumulation Ratio of G-037720 (Metabolite of Ipatasertib)
G-037220 is N-dealkylated metabolite of ipatasertib and the main metabolite in circulation. Accumulation Ratio was calculated as AUC0-24 (Cycle 1 Day 15) divided by AUC0-24 (Cycle 1 Day 1).
Phase Ib: Cmax of Apitolisib When Co-Administered With Abiraterone
Phase Ib: Tmax of Apitolisib When Co-Administered With Abiraterone
Phase Ib: AUC0-24 of Apitolisib When Co-Administered With Abiraterone
Phase Ib: Cmax of Abiraterone When Co-Administered With Ipatasertib or Apitolisib
Phase Ib: Tmax of Abiraterone When Co-Administered With Ipatasertib or Apitolisib
Phase Ib: AUC0-24 of Abiraterone When Co-Administered With Ipatasertib or Apitolisib
Phase Ib: Plasma Half-Life of Abiraterone When Co-Administered With Ipatasertib or Apitolisib
Phase Ib: Accumulation Ratio of Abiraterone When Co-Administered With Ipatasertib or Apitolisib
Accumulation Ratio was caculated as AUC0-24 (Cycle 1 Day 15) divided by AUC0-24 (Cycle 1 Day 1).
Phase II: Overall Survival (ITT Population)
Overall survival was defined as the interval between the date of screening and death due to any cause. Overall survival was estimated using Kaplan Meier method.
Phase II: Overall Survival in Participants With ICR IHC PTEN Loss
Overall survival was defined as the interval between the date of randomization and death from any cause. Overall survival was estimated using Kaplan Meier method. PTEN status was assessed by RUO IHC assay that was performed at ICR, UK. Samples with 100% of the tumor with no PTEN staining were classified as "ICR PTEN loss".
Phase II: Percentage of Participants With PSA Progression (ITT Population)
PSA progression was defined as per Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 criteria. PSA progression was defined as a ≥ 25% increase and an absolute increase of ≥ 2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) from the baseline value, or a ≥ 25% increase and an absolute increase of ≥ 2 ng/mL from the nadir if PSA decreases from baseline after treatment, which was confirmed by a second value obtained ≥ 3 weeks later.
Phase II: Percentage of Participants With PSA Progression in Participants With ICR PTEN Loss
PSA progression was defined as per Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 criteria. PSA progression was defined as a ≥ 25% increase and an absolute increase of ≥ 2 ng/mL from the baseline value, or a ≥ 25% increase and an absolute increase of ≥ 2 ng/mL from the nadir if PSA decreases from baseline after treatment, which was confirmed by a second value obtained ≥ 3 weeks later. PTEN status was assessed by RUO IHC assay that was performed at ICR, UK. Samples with 100% of the tumor with no PTEN staining were classified as "ICR PTEN loss".
Phase II: Time to PSA Progression (ITT Population)
Time to PSA progression: Time from screening to the first occurrence of PSA progression, as determined by investigator. PSA progression was defined as per Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 criteria. PSA progression is defined as a ≥ 25% increase and an absolute increase of ≥ 2 ng/mL from the baseline value, or a ≥ 25% increase and an absolute increase of ≥ 2 ng/mL from the nadir if PSA decreases from baseline after treatment, which was confirmed by a second value obtained ≥ 3 weeks later.
Phase II: Time to PSA Progression in Participants With ICR PTEN Loss
Time to PSA progression: Time from screening to the first occurrence of PSA progression, as determined by investigator. PSA progression was defined as per Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 criteria. PSA progression was defined as a ≥ 25% increase and an absolute increase of ≥ 2 ng/mL from the baseline value, or a ≥ 25% increase and an absolute increase of ≥ 2 ng/mL from the nadir if PSA decreases from baseline after treatment, which was confirmed by a second value obtained ≥ 3 weeks later. PTEN status was assessed by RUO IHC assay that was performed at ICR, UK. Samples with 100% of the tumor with no PTEN staining were classified as "ICR PTEN loss".
Phase II: Percentage of Participants With PSA Response (ITT Population)
PSA response was defined as a > 50% decrease in PSA from baseline, which was to be confirmed after ≥ 4 weeks by a confirmatory PSA measurement.
Phase II: Percentage of Participants With PSA Response in Participants With ICR PTEN Loss
PSA response was defined as a > 50% decrease in PSA from baseline, which was to be confirmed after ≥ 4 weeks by a confirmatory PSA measurement. PTEN status was assessed by RUO IHC assay that was performed at ICR, UK. Samples with 100% of the tumor with no PTEN staining were classified as "ICR PTEN loss".
Phase II: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (ITT Population)
Objective response was defined as having a confirm response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to a RECIST 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions, all pathological lymph nodes must have decreased to <10 mm in short axis. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum diameters), no progression in non-target lesions, and no new lesions.
Phase II: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response in Participants With ICR PTEN Loss
Objective response was defined as having a CR or PR according to a RECIST 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions, all pathological lymph nodes must have decreased to <10 mm in short axis. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum diameters), no progression in non-target lesions, and no new lesions. PTEN status was assessed by RUO IHC assay that was performed at ICR, UK. Samples with 100% of the tumor with no PTEN staining were classified as "ICR PTEN loss". Number of participants analyzed=participants with PTEN loss and evaluable for this endpoint.
Phase II: Duration of Tumor Response (ITT Population)
Duration of tumor response: time period from 1st documentation of objective response (CR/PR) (whichever status was recorded first) to date of 1st occurrence of investigator documented disease progression or death. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions, all pathological lymph nodes must have decreased to <10 mm in short axis. PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference baseline sum diameters), no progression in non-target lesions, and no new lesions. Progression: increase by at least 20% in sum of longest diameters of each target lesion, taking as reference smallest sum of longest diameters or appearance of one or more new lesions. Duration of tumor response was estimated using Kaplan Meier method.
Phase II: Duration of Tumor Response in Participants With ICR PTEN Loss
Duration of tumor response: time period from 1st documentation of objective response (CR/PR) (whichever status was recorded first) to date of 1st occurrence of investigator documented disease progression or death. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions, all pathological lymph nodes must have decreased to <10 mm in short axis. PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference baseline sum diameters), no progression in non-target lesions, and no new lesions. Progression: increase by at least 20% in sum of longest diameters of each target lesion, taking as reference smallest sum of longest diameters or appearance of one or more new lesions. Duration of tumor response was estimated using Kaplan Meier method.
Phase II: Percentage of Participants With Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC) Reduction Response (ITT Population)
CTC reduction response was defined as participants with a reduction in CTCs of ≥ 30% compared to baseline.
Phase II: Percentage of Participants With CTC Reduction Response in Participants With ICR PTEN Loss
CTC reduction response was defined as participants with a reduction in CTCs of ≥ 30% compared to baseline. PTEN status was assessed by RUO IHC assay that was performed at ICR, UK. Samples with 100% of the tumor with no PTEN staining were classified as "ICR PTEN loss".
Phase II: Percentage of Participants With CTC Conversion (ITT Population)
CTC conversion was defined as a decline to < 5 cells/7.5 milliliter (mL) post baseline among participants with CTC ≥ 5 cells/7.5 mL at baseline.
Phase II: Percentage of Participants With CTC Conversion in Participants With ICR PTEN Loss
CTC conversion was defined as a decline to < 5 cells/7.5 milliliter (mL) post baseline among participants with CTC ≥ 5 cells/7.5 mL at baseline. PTEN status was assessed by RUO IHC assay that was performed at ICR, UK. Samples with 100% of the tumor with no PTEN staining were classified as "ICR PTEN loss".
Phase II: Percentage of Participants With Pain Progression (ITT Population)
Pain progression was defined as ≥ 2 point-increase from baseline on the modified Brief Pain Inventory - short form (mBPI-sf). The mBPI-sf consists of four questions that assess pain intensity (worst, least, average, right now) and seven items within one question that assess the impact of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item was assessed on 0-10 scale with 0 being no pain to 10 being worst imaginable pain. Total score was the average of individual item (range 0-10).
Phase II: Percentage of Participants With Pain Progression in Participants With ICR PTEN Loss
Pain progression was defined as ≥ 2 point-increase from baseline on the modified Brief Pain Inventory - short form (mBPI-sf). The mBPI-sf consists of four questions that assess pain intensity (worst, least, average, right now) and seven items within one question that assess the impact of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item was assessed on 0-10 scale with 0 being no pain to 10 being worst imaginable pain. Total score was the average of individual item (range 0-10). PTEN status was assessed by RUO IHC assay that was performed at ICR, UK. Samples with 100% of the tumor with no PTEN staining were classified as "ICR PTEN loss".
Phase II: Time to Pain Progression (ITT Population)
Time to pain progression was defined as the time from screening till first occurrence of pain progression. Pain progression was defined as ≥ 2 point-increase from baseline on the modified Brief Pain Inventory - short form (mBPI-sf). The mBPI-sf consists of four questions that assess pain intensity (worst, least, average, right now) and seven items within one question that assess the impact of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item was assessed on 0-10 scale with 0 being no pain to 10 being worst imaginable pain. Total score was the average of individual item (range 0-10).
Phase II: Time to Pain Progression in Participants With ICR PTEN Loss
Time to pain progression was defined as the time from screening till first occurrence of pain progression. Pain progression: ≥ 2 point-increase from baseline on the modified Brief Pain Inventory - short form (mBPI-sf). The mBPI-sf consists of 4questions that assess pain intensity (worst, least, average, right now) and seven items within one question that assess the impact of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item was assessed on 0-10 scale with 0 being no pain to 10 being worst imaginable pain. Total score was the average of individual item (range 0-10). PTEN status was assessed by RUO IHC assay that was performed at ICR, UK. Samples with 100% of the tumor with no PTEN staining were classified as "ICR PTEN loss".
Phase II: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
An Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.
Phase II: Ipatasertib Plasma Concentrations When Co-Administered With Abiraterone
Phase II: G-037720 (Metabolite of Ipatasertib) Plasma Concentrations
G-037220 is N-dealkylated metabolite of ipatasertib and the main metabolite in circulation.

Full Information

First Posted
December 2, 2011
Last Updated
August 17, 2023
Sponsor
Genentech, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01485861
Brief Title
Study of Ipatasertib or Apitolisib With Abiraterone Acetate Versus Abiraterone Acetate in Participants With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Previously Treated With Docetaxel Chemotherapy
Official Title
A Phase Ib/II Study of Ipatasertib (GDC-0068) or Apitolisib (GDC-0980) With Abiraterone Acetate Versus Abiraterone Acetate in Patients With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Previously Treated With Docetaxel-Based Chemotherapy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 11, 2012 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 1, 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 31, 2022 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Genentech, Inc.

4. Oversight

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This multicenter, international, Phase Ib/II trial consists of three stages: a Phase Ib, open-label stage in which the recommended Phase II dose was determined for ipataseritib administrated in combination with abiraterone and of apitolisib administrated in combination with abiraterone (this phase is no longer active), a Phase II, 3-arm, double-blind, randomized comparison of ipatasertib with abiraterone and prednisone/prednisolone versus placebo with abiraterone and prednisone/prednisolone and a safety single-arm, open-label cohort of ipatasertib 400 mg daily alone or in combination with prednisone/prednisolone or prednisone/prednisolone plus abiraterone.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Prostate Cancer

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 1, Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Masking Description
In Phase II participants and investigators were blinded with regard to treatment status (i.e., ipatasertib vs. placebo). Phase Ib and the safety cohort were open-label.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
298 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Phase Ib: Ipatasertib 400 mg + abiraterone
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive ipatasertib 400 mg once daily, abiraterone 1000 mg once daily, and prednisone/prednisolone 5 mg twice daily (bid) continuously in 28-day treatment cycles until disease progression or intolerable toxicity.
Arm Title
Phase Ib: Apitolisib 30 mg + abiraterone
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive apitolisib 30 mg once daily, abiraterone 1000 mg once daily, and prednisone/prednisolone 5 mg twice daily (bid) continuously in 28-day treatment cycles until disease progression or intolerable toxicity.
Arm Title
Phase II: Ipatasertib 400 mg + abiraterone
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive Ipatasertib 400 mg once daily, abiraterone 1000 mg once daily, and prednisone/prednisolone 5 mg bid continuously in 28-day treatment cycles until disease progression or intolerable toxicity.
Arm Title
Phase II: Ipatasertib 200 mg + abiraterone
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive Ipatasertib 200 mg once daily, abiraterone 1000 mg once daily, and prednisone/prednisolone 5 mg bid continuously in 28-day treatment cycles until disease progression or intolerable toxicity.
Arm Title
Phase II: Placebo + abiraterone
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Participants will receive placebo (for Ipatasertib) once daily, abiraterone 1000 mg once daily, and prednisone/prednisolone 5 mg bid continuously in 28-day treatment cycles until disease progression or intolerable toxicity.
Arm Title
Safety Cohort: Ipataseritib 400 mg + Abiraterone + Prednisone
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive ipatasertib 400 mg orally once daily and/or prednisone/prednisolone 5 mg orally once daily or bid and/or abiraterone 1000 mg orally once daily according to the following schedule: ipatasertib in the morning during Cycle 1, Days 1-7; ipatasertib in the morning plus prednisone/prednisolone once at night during Cycle 1, Day 8; ipatasertib in the morning plus prednisone/prednisolone bid (morning and night) during Cycle 1, Days 9-11; ipatasertib in the morning plus prednisone/prednisolone bid (morning and night) and abiraterone in the morning during Cycle 1, Days 12-18; ipatasertib in the evening plus prednisone/prednisolone bid (morning and night) and abiraterone at the same time as ipatasertib during Cycle 1, Days 19-25; Cycle 2 and beyond ipatasertib once daily in the morning or evening, abiraterone at the same time as ipatasertib, and prednisone/prednisolone bid.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Abiraterone
Intervention Description
Orally once daily
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Apitolisib
Intervention Description
Orally once daily
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ipatasertib
Intervention Description
Orally once daily
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Orally once daily
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Prednisone
Intervention Description
Orally bid
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Prednisolone
Intervention Description
Orally bid
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Phase Ib: Percentage of Participants With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLTs)
Description
DLT: 1 of the following toxicities, at least possibly related to ipatasertib or apitolisib. 1) Grade ≥ 3 non-hematologic, non-hepatic major organ AE; 2) Grade ≥ 3 febrile neutropenia; 3) Grade ≥ 4 neutropenia (absolute neutrophils less than [<] 500 per microliter) lasting greater than (>) 7 days; 4) Grade ≥3 thrombocytopenia associated with acute hemorrhage; 5) Grade ≥4 thrombocytopenia; 6) Grade ≥4 anemia; 7) 1 episode of fasting Grade ≥4 hyperglycemia or 3 episodes of fasting Grade 3 hyperglycemia on separate days within 7 days, as determined by laboratory blood glucose evaluation; 8) Grade ≥3 elevation lasting for > 48 hours for hepatic transaminase or liver-specific alkaline phosphatase or total bilirubin. Adverse events were graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 4.0.
Time Frame
Days 1 to 28 of Cycle 1 (Cycle length = 28 days)
Title
Phase Ib: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Description
An Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.
Time Frame
Baseline up until 30 days following the last administration of study treatment or until initiation of another anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurs first (up to approximately 10 months).
Title
Phase Ib: Recommended Phase II Dose (RP2D) of Ipatasertib and Apitolisib
Description
RP2D is a dose of a drug which would be used in Phase II stage of the study. RP2D was to be determined based on maximum tolerated dose (MTD) in Phase Ib stage of the study. The highest dose level (in 3+3 escalation scheme) with an acceptable safety profile and with a minimum of 6 participants at which fewer than one-third of participants experienced a DLT was declared the MTD and RP2D.
Time Frame
Days 1 to 28 of Cycle 1 (Cycle length = 28 days)
Title
Phase II: Radiographic Progression Free Survival (rPFS) (Intent-To-Treat [ITT] Population)
Description
rPFS: Time from randomization to the first occurrence of disease progression, as determined by investigator review of tumor assessments via CT scan and bone scans, or death on study from any cause, whichever occurred first. Progression was defined as follows: Soft tissue mass (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors [RECIST] 1.1): at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions compared to smallest sum of diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm, progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions. Bone: ≥ 2 new bone lesions plus 2 additional at confirmation on a second bone scan ≥ 4 weeks later (< 12 weeks after randomization). ≥ 2 new bone lesions consistent with progression, without need for confirmatory bone scan (≥ 12 weeks after randomization).
Time Frame
Screening up to radiographic progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at screening, after Cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, every three cycles [12 weeks] thereafter up to end of treatment [up to 3.6 years overall]) (cycle length = 28 days)
Title
Phase II: rPFS in Participants With Institute of Cancer Research (ICR) Phosphatase and Tensin Homolog (PTEN) Loss
Description
rPFS: Time from randomization to the first occurrence of disease progression, as determined by investigator review of tumor assessments via CT scan and bone scans, or death on study from any cause, whichever occurred first. Progression was defined as follows: Soft tissue mass (RECIST 1.1): at least 20% increase in sum of diameters of target lesions compared to smallest sum of diameters on-study and absolute increase of at least 5 mm, progression of existing non-target lesions, or presence of new lesions. Bone: ≥ 2 new bone lesions plus 2 additional at confirmation on 2nd bone scan ≥ 4 weeks later (< 12 weeks after randomization). ≥ 2 new bone lesions consistent with progression, without need for confirmatory bone scan (≥ 12 weeks after randomization). PTEN status was assessed by RUO IHC assay that was performed at ICR, UK. Samples with 100% of the tumor with no PTEN staining were classified as "ICR PTEN loss". Number of participants analyzed=participants with PTEN loss.
Time Frame
Screening up to radiographic progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at screening, after Cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, every three cycles [12 weeks] thereafter up to end of treatment [up to 3.6 years overall]) (cycle length = 28 days)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Phase Ib: Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Ipatasertib When Co-Administered With Abiraterone
Time Frame
Pre-dose (0 hour), 1, 2, 4, 6, 24 hours post dose on Days 1, 15 of Cycle 1 (cycle length = 28 days)
Title
Phase Ib: Time to Cmax (Tmax) of Ipatasertib When Co-Administered With Abiraterone
Time Frame
Pre-dose (0 hour), 1, 2, 4, 6, 24 hours post dose on Days 1, 15 of Cycle 1 (cycle length = 28 days)
Title
Phase Ib: Area Under The Concentration-Time Curve From Time 0 to 24 Hours (AUC0-24) of Ipatasertib When Co-Administered With Abiraterone
Time Frame
Pre-dose (0 hour), 1, 2, 4, 6, 24 hours post dose on Days 1, 15 of Cycle 1 (cycle length = 28 days)
Title
Phase Ib: Total Body Clearance (CL/F) of Ipatasertib When Co-Administered With Abiraterone
Description
Clearance of a drug is a measure of the rate at which a drug is metabolized or eliminated by normal biological processes. Clearance obtained after oral dose is influenced by the fraction of the dose absorbed. Drug clearance is a quantitative measure of the rate at which a drug substance is removed from the blood.
Time Frame
Pre-dose (0 hour), 1, 2, 4, 6, 24 hours post dose on Days 15 of Cycle 1 (cycle length = 28 days)
Title
Phase Ib: Accumulation Ratio of Ipatasertib When Co-Administered With Abiraterone
Description
Accumulation Ratio was calculated as AUC0-24 (Cycle 1 Day 15) divided by AUC0-24 (Cycle 1 Day 1).
Time Frame
Pre-dose (0 hour), 1, 2, 4, 6, 24 hours post dose on Days 1, 15 of Cycle 1 (cycle length = 28 days)
Title
Phase Ib: Cmax of G-037720 (Metabolite of Ipatasertib)
Description
G-037220 is N-dealkylated metabolite of ipatasertib and the main metabolite in circulation.
Time Frame
Pre-dose (0 hour), 1, 2, 4, 6, 24 hours post dose on Days 1, 15 of Cycle 1 (cycle length = 28 days)
Title
Phase Ib: Tmax of G-037720 (Metabolite of Ipatasertib)
Description
G-037220 is N-dealkylated metabolite of ipatasertib and the main metabolite in circulation.
Time Frame
Pre-dose (0 hour), 1, 2, 4, 6, 24 hours post dose on Days 1, 15 of Cycle 1 (cycle length = 28 days)
Title
Phase Ib: AUC0-24 of G-037720 (Metabolite of Ipatasertib)
Description
G-037220 is N-dealkylated metabolite of ipatasertib and the main metabolite in circulation.
Time Frame
Pre-dose (0 hour), 1, 2, 4, 6, 24 hours post dose on Days 1, 15 of Cycle 1 (cycle length = 28 days)
Title
Phase Ib: Accumulation Ratio of G-037720 (Metabolite of Ipatasertib)
Description
G-037220 is N-dealkylated metabolite of ipatasertib and the main metabolite in circulation. Accumulation Ratio was calculated as AUC0-24 (Cycle 1 Day 15) divided by AUC0-24 (Cycle 1 Day 1).
Time Frame
Pre-dose (0 hour), 1, 2, 4, 6, 24 hours post dose on Days 1, 15 of Cycle 1 (cycle length = 28 days)
Title
Phase Ib: Cmax of Apitolisib When Co-Administered With Abiraterone
Time Frame
Pre-dose (0 hour), 1, 2, 4, 6, 24 hours post dose on Days 1, 15 of Cycle 1 (cycle length = 28 days)
Title
Phase Ib: Tmax of Apitolisib When Co-Administered With Abiraterone
Time Frame
Pre-dose (0 hour), 1, 2, 4, 6, 24 hours post dose on Days 1, 15 of Cycle 1 (cycle length = 28 days)
Title
Phase Ib: AUC0-24 of Apitolisib When Co-Administered With Abiraterone
Time Frame
Pre-dose (0 hour), 1, 2, 4, 6, 24 hours post dose on Days 1, 15 of Cycle 1 (cycle length = 28 days)
Title
Phase Ib: Cmax of Abiraterone When Co-Administered With Ipatasertib or Apitolisib
Time Frame
Pre-dose (0 hour), 1, 2, 4, 6, 24 hours post dose on Days 1, 15 of Cycle 1 (cycle length = 28 days)
Title
Phase Ib: Tmax of Abiraterone When Co-Administered With Ipatasertib or Apitolisib
Time Frame
Pre-dose (0 hour), 1, 2, 4, 6, 24 hours post dose on Days 1, 15 of Cycle 1 (cycle length = 28 days)
Title
Phase Ib: AUC0-24 of Abiraterone When Co-Administered With Ipatasertib or Apitolisib
Time Frame
Pre-dose (0 hour), 1, 2, 4, 6, 24 hours post dose on Days 1, 15 of Cycle 1 (cycle length = 28 days)
Title
Phase Ib: Plasma Half-Life of Abiraterone When Co-Administered With Ipatasertib or Apitolisib
Time Frame
Pre-dose (0 hour), 1, 2, 4, 6, 24 hours post dose on Days 1, 15 of Cycle 1 (cycle length = 28 days)
Title
Phase Ib: Accumulation Ratio of Abiraterone When Co-Administered With Ipatasertib or Apitolisib
Description
Accumulation Ratio was caculated as AUC0-24 (Cycle 1 Day 15) divided by AUC0-24 (Cycle 1 Day 1).
Time Frame
Pre-dose (0 hour), 1, 2, 4, 6, 24 hours post dose on Days 1, 15 of Cycle 1 (cycle length = 28 days)
Title
Phase II: Overall Survival (ITT Population)
Description
Overall survival was defined as the interval between the date of screening and death due to any cause. Overall survival was estimated using Kaplan Meier method.
Time Frame
Screening up to death (assessed at screening, after Cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, every three cycles [12 weeks] thereafter up to end of treatment [up to 8.9 years overall]) (cycle length = 28 days)
Title
Phase II: Overall Survival in Participants With ICR IHC PTEN Loss
Description
Overall survival was defined as the interval between the date of randomization and death from any cause. Overall survival was estimated using Kaplan Meier method. PTEN status was assessed by RUO IHC assay that was performed at ICR, UK. Samples with 100% of the tumor with no PTEN staining were classified as "ICR PTEN loss".
Time Frame
Screening up to death (assessed at screening, after Cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, every three cycles [12 weeks] thereafter up to end of treatment [up to 8.9 years overall]) (cycle length = 28 days)
Title
Phase II: Percentage of Participants With PSA Progression (ITT Population)
Description
PSA progression was defined as per Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 criteria. PSA progression was defined as a ≥ 25% increase and an absolute increase of ≥ 2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) from the baseline value, or a ≥ 25% increase and an absolute increase of ≥ 2 ng/mL from the nadir if PSA decreases from baseline after treatment, which was confirmed by a second value obtained ≥ 3 weeks later.
Time Frame
Screening up to PSA progression (assessed at screening, after Cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, every three cycles [12 weeks] thereafter up to end of treatment [up to 3.6 years overall]) (cycle length = 28 days)
Title
Phase II: Percentage of Participants With PSA Progression in Participants With ICR PTEN Loss
Description
PSA progression was defined as per Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 criteria. PSA progression was defined as a ≥ 25% increase and an absolute increase of ≥ 2 ng/mL from the baseline value, or a ≥ 25% increase and an absolute increase of ≥ 2 ng/mL from the nadir if PSA decreases from baseline after treatment, which was confirmed by a second value obtained ≥ 3 weeks later. PTEN status was assessed by RUO IHC assay that was performed at ICR, UK. Samples with 100% of the tumor with no PTEN staining were classified as "ICR PTEN loss".
Time Frame
Screening up to PSA progression (assessed at screening, after Cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, every three cycles [12 weeks] thereafter up to end of treatment [up to 3.6 years overall]) (cycle length = 28 days)
Title
Phase II: Time to PSA Progression (ITT Population)
Description
Time to PSA progression: Time from screening to the first occurrence of PSA progression, as determined by investigator. PSA progression was defined as per Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 criteria. PSA progression is defined as a ≥ 25% increase and an absolute increase of ≥ 2 ng/mL from the baseline value, or a ≥ 25% increase and an absolute increase of ≥ 2 ng/mL from the nadir if PSA decreases from baseline after treatment, which was confirmed by a second value obtained ≥ 3 weeks later.
Time Frame
Screening up to PSA progression (assessed at screening, after Cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, every three cycles [12 weeks] thereafter up to end of treatment [up to 3.6 years overall]) (cycle length = 28 days)
Title
Phase II: Time to PSA Progression in Participants With ICR PTEN Loss
Description
Time to PSA progression: Time from screening to the first occurrence of PSA progression, as determined by investigator. PSA progression was defined as per Prostate Cancer Working Group 2 criteria. PSA progression was defined as a ≥ 25% increase and an absolute increase of ≥ 2 ng/mL from the baseline value, or a ≥ 25% increase and an absolute increase of ≥ 2 ng/mL from the nadir if PSA decreases from baseline after treatment, which was confirmed by a second value obtained ≥ 3 weeks later. PTEN status was assessed by RUO IHC assay that was performed at ICR, UK. Samples with 100% of the tumor with no PTEN staining were classified as "ICR PTEN loss".
Time Frame
Screening up to PSA progression (assessed at screening, after Cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, every three cycles [12 weeks] thereafter up to end of treatment [up to 3.6 years overall]) (cycle length = 28 days)
Title
Phase II: Percentage of Participants With PSA Response (ITT Population)
Description
PSA response was defined as a > 50% decrease in PSA from baseline, which was to be confirmed after ≥ 4 weeks by a confirmatory PSA measurement.
Time Frame
Baseline up to 30 days after last dose (assessed at baseline, Day 1 of every cycle [starting from Cycle 2] till 30 days after last dose [up to overall 3.6 years]) (cycle length = 28 days)
Title
Phase II: Percentage of Participants With PSA Response in Participants With ICR PTEN Loss
Description
PSA response was defined as a > 50% decrease in PSA from baseline, which was to be confirmed after ≥ 4 weeks by a confirmatory PSA measurement. PTEN status was assessed by RUO IHC assay that was performed at ICR, UK. Samples with 100% of the tumor with no PTEN staining were classified as "ICR PTEN loss".
Time Frame
Baseline up to 30 days after last dose (assessed at baseline, Day 1 of every cycle [starting from Cycle 2] till 30 days after last dose [up to overall 3.6 years]) (cycle length = 28 days)
Title
Phase II: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response (ITT Population)
Description
Objective response was defined as having a confirm response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to a RECIST 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions, all pathological lymph nodes must have decreased to <10 mm in short axis. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum diameters), no progression in non-target lesions, and no new lesions.
Time Frame
Screening up to radiographic progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at screening, after Cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, every three cycles [12 weeks] thereafter up to end of treatment [up to 3.6 years overall]) (cycle length = 28 days)
Title
Phase II: Percentage of Participants With Objective Response in Participants With ICR PTEN Loss
Description
Objective response was defined as having a CR or PR according to a RECIST 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions, all pathological lymph nodes must have decreased to <10 mm in short axis. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the baseline sum diameters), no progression in non-target lesions, and no new lesions. PTEN status was assessed by RUO IHC assay that was performed at ICR, UK. Samples with 100% of the tumor with no PTEN staining were classified as "ICR PTEN loss". Number of participants analyzed=participants with PTEN loss and evaluable for this endpoint.
Time Frame
Screening up to radiographic progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at screening, after Cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, every three cycles [12 weeks] thereafter up to end of treatment [up to 3.6 years overall]) (cycle length = 28 days)
Title
Phase II: Duration of Tumor Response (ITT Population)
Description
Duration of tumor response: time period from 1st documentation of objective response (CR/PR) (whichever status was recorded first) to date of 1st occurrence of investigator documented disease progression or death. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions, all pathological lymph nodes must have decreased to <10 mm in short axis. PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference baseline sum diameters), no progression in non-target lesions, and no new lesions. Progression: increase by at least 20% in sum of longest diameters of each target lesion, taking as reference smallest sum of longest diameters or appearance of one or more new lesions. Duration of tumor response was estimated using Kaplan Meier method.
Time Frame
Screening up to radiographic progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at screening, after Cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, every three cycles [12 weeks] thereafter up to end of treatment [up to 3.6 years overall]) (cycle length = 28 days)
Title
Phase II: Duration of Tumor Response in Participants With ICR PTEN Loss
Description
Duration of tumor response: time period from 1st documentation of objective response (CR/PR) (whichever status was recorded first) to date of 1st occurrence of investigator documented disease progression or death. CR: disappearance of all target and non-target lesions and no new lesions, all pathological lymph nodes must have decreased to <10 mm in short axis. PR: at least 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference baseline sum diameters), no progression in non-target lesions, and no new lesions. Progression: increase by at least 20% in sum of longest diameters of each target lesion, taking as reference smallest sum of longest diameters or appearance of one or more new lesions. Duration of tumor response was estimated using Kaplan Meier method.
Time Frame
Screening up to radiographic progression or death, whichever occurred first (assessed at screening, after Cycles 3, 5, 7, 9, every three cycles [12 weeks] thereafter up to end of treatment [up to 3.6 years overall]) (cycle length = 28 days)
Title
Phase II: Percentage of Participants With Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC) Reduction Response (ITT Population)
Description
CTC reduction response was defined as participants with a reduction in CTCs of ≥ 30% compared to baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline, on Day 1 of Cycle 2, on Day 1 of Cycle 3, and at the treatment completion visit (up to overall 3.6 years) (cycle length=28 days)
Title
Phase II: Percentage of Participants With CTC Reduction Response in Participants With ICR PTEN Loss
Description
CTC reduction response was defined as participants with a reduction in CTCs of ≥ 30% compared to baseline. PTEN status was assessed by RUO IHC assay that was performed at ICR, UK. Samples with 100% of the tumor with no PTEN staining were classified as "ICR PTEN loss".
Time Frame
Baseline, on Day 1 of Cycle 2, on Day 1 of Cycle 3, and at the treatment completion visit (up to overall 3.6 years) (cycle length=28 days)
Title
Phase II: Percentage of Participants With CTC Conversion (ITT Population)
Description
CTC conversion was defined as a decline to < 5 cells/7.5 milliliter (mL) post baseline among participants with CTC ≥ 5 cells/7.5 mL at baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline, on Day 1 of Cycle 2, on Day 1 of Cycle 3, and at the treatment completion visit (up to overall 3.6 years) (cycle length=28 days)
Title
Phase II: Percentage of Participants With CTC Conversion in Participants With ICR PTEN Loss
Description
CTC conversion was defined as a decline to < 5 cells/7.5 milliliter (mL) post baseline among participants with CTC ≥ 5 cells/7.5 mL at baseline. PTEN status was assessed by RUO IHC assay that was performed at ICR, UK. Samples with 100% of the tumor with no PTEN staining were classified as "ICR PTEN loss".
Time Frame
Baseline, on Day 1 of Cycle 2, on Day 1 of Cycle 3, and at the treatment completion visit (up to overall 3.6 years) (cycle length=28 days)
Title
Phase II: Percentage of Participants With Pain Progression (ITT Population)
Description
Pain progression was defined as ≥ 2 point-increase from baseline on the modified Brief Pain Inventory - short form (mBPI-sf). The mBPI-sf consists of four questions that assess pain intensity (worst, least, average, right now) and seven items within one question that assess the impact of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item was assessed on 0-10 scale with 0 being no pain to 10 being worst imaginable pain. Total score was the average of individual item (range 0-10).
Time Frame
Screening, Day 1 of each cycle (cycle length=28 days) up to treatment completion (up to 3.6 years)
Title
Phase II: Percentage of Participants With Pain Progression in Participants With ICR PTEN Loss
Description
Pain progression was defined as ≥ 2 point-increase from baseline on the modified Brief Pain Inventory - short form (mBPI-sf). The mBPI-sf consists of four questions that assess pain intensity (worst, least, average, right now) and seven items within one question that assess the impact of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item was assessed on 0-10 scale with 0 being no pain to 10 being worst imaginable pain. Total score was the average of individual item (range 0-10). PTEN status was assessed by RUO IHC assay that was performed at ICR, UK. Samples with 100% of the tumor with no PTEN staining were classified as "ICR PTEN loss".
Time Frame
Screening, Day 1 of each cycle (cycle length=28 days) up to treatment completion (up to 3.6 years)
Title
Phase II: Time to Pain Progression (ITT Population)
Description
Time to pain progression was defined as the time from screening till first occurrence of pain progression. Pain progression was defined as ≥ 2 point-increase from baseline on the modified Brief Pain Inventory - short form (mBPI-sf). The mBPI-sf consists of four questions that assess pain intensity (worst, least, average, right now) and seven items within one question that assess the impact of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item was assessed on 0-10 scale with 0 being no pain to 10 being worst imaginable pain. Total score was the average of individual item (range 0-10).
Time Frame
Screening, Day 1 of each cycle (cycle length=28 days) up to treatment completion (up to 3.6 years)
Title
Phase II: Time to Pain Progression in Participants With ICR PTEN Loss
Description
Time to pain progression was defined as the time from screening till first occurrence of pain progression. Pain progression: ≥ 2 point-increase from baseline on the modified Brief Pain Inventory - short form (mBPI-sf). The mBPI-sf consists of 4questions that assess pain intensity (worst, least, average, right now) and seven items within one question that assess the impact of pain on daily functions (general activity, mood, walking ability, normal work, relations with other people, sleep, enjoyment of life). Each item was assessed on 0-10 scale with 0 being no pain to 10 being worst imaginable pain. Total score was the average of individual item (range 0-10). PTEN status was assessed by RUO IHC assay that was performed at ICR, UK. Samples with 100% of the tumor with no PTEN staining were classified as "ICR PTEN loss".
Time Frame
Screening, Day 1 of each cycle (cycle length=28 days) up to treatment completion (up to 3.6 years)
Title
Phase II: Percentage of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)
Description
An Adverse Event (AE) was defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product.
Time Frame
Baseline up until 30 days following the last administration of study treatment or until initiation of another anti-cancer therapy, whichever occurred first (up to approximately 8.9 years)
Title
Phase II: Ipatasertib Plasma Concentrations When Co-Administered With Abiraterone
Time Frame
Phase II: Cycle 1, Day 1: 1, 4 hours postdose; Cycle 1, Day 15: predose, 2, 4 hours postdose; Cycle 2, Day 1: predose, 1-4 hours postdose (cycle length = 28 days)
Title
Phase II: G-037720 (Metabolite of Ipatasertib) Plasma Concentrations
Description
G-037220 is N-dealkylated metabolite of ipatasertib and the main metabolite in circulation.
Time Frame
Phase II: Cycle 1, Day 1: 1, 4 hours postdose; Cycle 1, Day 15: predose, 2, 4 hours postdose; Cycle 2, Day 1: predose, 1-4 hours postdose (cycle length = 28 days)

10. Eligibility

Sex
Male
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Histologically confirmed metastatic or advanced prostate adenocarcinoma that has been previously treated with docetaxel-based therapy and has progressed during treatment of at least one hormonal therapy(prior docetaxel is not required for the safety cohort) Two rising PSA levels greater than or equal to (>/=) 2 ng/mL measured >/= 1 week apart or radiographic evidence of disease progression in soft tissue or bone Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0 or 1 at screening Adequate hematologic and organ function Documented willingness to use an effective means of contraception Safety cohort only: agreement to use CGM for first cycle of treatment Exclusion Criteria: History of Type I or Type II diabetes mellitus requiring insulin; safety cohort: patients who are receiving any pharmacologic treatment for diabetes are not eligible New York Heart Association Class III or IV heart failure or Left ventricular ejection fraction < 50% or ventricular arrhythmia requiring medication Significant atherosclerotic disease, as evidenced by: unstable angina, history of myocardial infarction within 6 months prior to Day 1, or cerebrovascular accident within 6 months prior to Day 1 Active autoimmune disease that is not controlled by nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or active inflammatory disease which requires immunosuppressive therapy Clinically significant history of liver disease History of adrenal insufficiency or hyperaldosteronism Phase II only: Previous therapy for prostate cancer with 17 alpha-hydroxylase/C17,20-lyase inhibitors, including abiraterone Phase II only: Previous treatment for prostate cancer with Protein kinase B phosphatidylinositol 3 kinase and/or mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors Need for chronic corticosteroid therapy of >/= 20 mg of prednisone per day or an equivalent dose of other anti inflammatory corticosteroids or immunosuppressant
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clinical Trials
Organizational Affiliation
Genentech, Inc.
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
HonorHealth Research Institute ? Bisgrove
City
Scottsdale
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85258
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pacific Hematology Oncology Associates
City
San Francisco
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94115
Country
United States
Facility Name
Florida Cancer Specialists - Fort Myers (New Hampshire Ct)
City
Fort Myers
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33901-8101
Country
United States
Facility Name
Florida Cancer Specialists; Sarasota
City
Sarasota
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34232
Country
United States
Facility Name
Kaiser Permanente Medical Ctr
City
Honolulu
State/Province
Hawaii
ZIP/Postal Code
96819
Country
United States
Facility Name
Johns Hopkins Univ; Bunting Blaustein Cancer Center
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21231
Country
United States
Facility Name
Karmanos Cancer Institute
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Urology Cancer Center & GU Research Network
City
Omaha
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68130
Country
United States
Facility Name
New York Cancer and Blood Specialists - Setauket Medical Oncology
City
East Setauket
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11733
Country
United States
Facility Name
Weill Cornell Medical College
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10065
Country
United States
Facility Name
Carolina Urologic Research Center
City
Myrtle Beach
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29572
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sarah Cannon Cancer Center - Tennessee Oncology, Pllc
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37203
Country
United States
Facility Name
Masarykuv onkologicky ustav
City
Brno
ZIP/Postal Code
656 53
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Fakultni nemocnice Hradec Kralove; I. interni klinika,Oddeleni invazivni kardiologie
City
Hradec Kralove
ZIP/Postal Code
50012
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Urocentrum Praha s.r.o.
City
Praha 2
ZIP/Postal Code
120 00
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Vseobecna fakultni nemocnice v Praze
City
Praha 2
ZIP/Postal Code
128 08
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Fakultni Thomayerova Nemocnice; Revmatologicke Oddeleni
City
Praha
ZIP/Postal Code
140 59
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
ICO Paul Papin; Oncologie Medicale.
City
Angers
ZIP/Postal Code
49055
Country
France
Facility Name
Centre Léon Bérard - Centre régional de lutte contre le cancer Rhône-Alpes
City
Lyon
ZIP/Postal Code
69008
Country
France
Facility Name
Hia Du Val De Grace
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75230
Country
France
Facility Name
Institut Curie; Oncologie Medicale
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75231
Country
France
Facility Name
GH Paris Saint Joseph; Hopital De Jour Oncologie
City
Paris
ZIP/Postal Code
75674
Country
France
Facility Name
Hopital d'Instruction des Armees de Begin
City
Saint-Mande
ZIP/Postal Code
94160
Country
France
Facility Name
Institut Gustave Roussy; Departement Oncologie Medicale
City
Villejuif
ZIP/Postal Code
94805
Country
France
Facility Name
Alexandras Hospital; Dept. of Clin. Therapeutics, Athens Uni School of Medicine
City
Athens
ZIP/Postal Code
115 28
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Univ General Hosp Heraklion; Medical Oncology
City
Heraklion
ZIP/Postal Code
711 10
Country
Greece
Facility Name
University Hospital of Larissa; Oncology
City
Larissa
ZIP/Postal Code
413 35
Country
Greece
Facility Name
University Hospital of Patras Medical Oncology
City
Patras
ZIP/Postal Code
265 04
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Metropolitan Hospital; 2Nd Oncology Clinic
City
Piraeus
ZIP/Postal Code
185 47
Country
Greece
Facility Name
IRST Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo Per Lo Studio E Cura Dei Tumori, Sede Meldola; Oncologia Medica
City
Meldola
State/Province
Emilia-Romagna
ZIP/Postal Code
47014
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliera Istituti Ospitalieri
City
Cremona
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
26100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Irccs Ospedale San Raffaele;Oncologia Medica
City
Milano
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
20132
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Irccs Istituto Nazionale Dei Tumori (Int);S.C. Medicina Oncologica 2
City
Milano
State/Province
Lombardia
ZIP/Postal Code
20133
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Ospedale S. Donato; Divisione Di Reumatologia
City
Arezzo
State/Province
Toscana
ZIP/Postal Code
52100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Het Nederlands Kanker Inst
City
Amsterdam
ZIP/Postal Code
1066 EC
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Vu Medisch Centrum; Afdeling Longziekten
City
Amsterdam
ZIP/Postal Code
1081 HV
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
MC Haaglanden; Oncologie
City
Den Haag
ZIP/Postal Code
2512 VA
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
UMC St Radboud
City
Nijmegen
ZIP/Postal Code
6525 GA
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Sint Franciscus Gasthuis; Inwendige Geneeskunde
City
Rotterdam
ZIP/Postal Code
3045 PM
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Sf. Constantin Hospital; Oncology
City
Brasov
ZIP/Postal Code
500019
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Prof. Dr. Th. Burghele Clin Urology Hosp
City
Bucharest
ZIP/Postal Code
050659
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Prof. Dr. I. Chiricuta Institute of Oncology
City
Cluj Napoca
ZIP/Postal Code
400015
Country
Romania
Facility Name
ONCOMED - Medical Centre
City
Timisoara
ZIP/Postal Code
300239
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Municipal Hosp Turdal; Oncology
City
Turda
ZIP/Postal Code
401103
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Hospital General Universitario de Elche; Servicio de Oncologia
City
Elche
State/Province
Alicante
ZIP/Postal Code
03203
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol; Servicio de Oncologia
City
Badalona
State/Province
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08916
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Corporacio Sanitaria Parc Tauli; Servicio de Oncologia
City
Sabadell
State/Province
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
8208
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Univ Vall d'Hebron; Servicio de Oncologia
City
Sant Andreu de La Barca
State/Province
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
08740
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Clinica Universitaria de Navarra
City
Pamplona
State/Province
Navarra
ZIP/Postal Code
31008
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28007
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre; Servicio de Oncologia
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28041
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Madrid Norte Sanchinarro
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28050
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Clinico Universitario Virgen de la Victoria
City
Malaga
ZIP/Postal Code
29010
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Queen Elizabeth Hospital; Centre for Clinical Haematology
City
Birmingham
ZIP/Postal Code
B15 2TH
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Gartnavel General Hospital
City
Glasgow
ZIP/Postal Code
G12 0XH
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
St. James University Hospital; Pharmacy Department
City
Leeds
ZIP/Postal Code
LS9 7TF
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
The Clatterbridge Cancer Centre NHS Foundation Trust
City
Liverpool
ZIP/Postal Code
L7 8YA
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Sarah Cannon Research Institute
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
W1G 6AD
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
The Royal Marsden Hospital
City
Sutton
ZIP/Postal Code
SM2 5PT
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Study of Ipatasertib or Apitolisib With Abiraterone Acetate Versus Abiraterone Acetate in Participants With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Previously Treated With Docetaxel Chemotherapy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs