Open-Label Non-Inferiority Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Xeomin® in Subjects With Cervical Dystonia Flex
Primary Purpose
Cervical Dystonia
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Xeomin®
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Cervical Dystonia
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Documented clinical diagnosis of idiopathic or genetic Cervical Dystonia
Exclusion Criteria:
- Current treatment with botulinum toxin of any type for any other indication (including aesthetic indications) and for any body region during the study.
Sites / Locations
- Merz Investigative Site #001234
- Merz Investigative Site 001017
- Merz Investigative Site #001225
- Merz Investigative Site #001219
- Merz Investigative Site # 001276
- Merz Investigative Site #001231
- Merz Investigative Site #001076
- Merz Investigative Site #001019
- Merz Investigative Site #001046
- Merz Investigative Site #001075
- Merz Investigative Site #001217
- Merz Investigative Site #1253
- Merz Investigative Site #001055
- Merz Investigative Site# 01255
- Merz Investigative Site #001215
- Merz Investigative Site # 01069
- Merz Investigative Site #001110
- Merz Investigative Site # 001071
- Merz Investigative Site # 001018
- Merz Investigative Site #001030
- Merz Investigative Site # 0001275
- Merz Investigative Site #1250
- Merz Investigative Site #001210
- Merz Investigative Site #001221
- Merz Investigative Site #001233
- Merz Investigative Site #1256
- Merz Investigative Site# 01252
- Merz Investigative Site #001005
- Merz Investigative Site# 01260
- Merz Investigative Site #001009
- Merz Investigative Site #1265
- Merz Investigative Site #001220
- Merz Investigative Site #1033
- Merz Investigative Site #1251
- Merz Investigative Site # 0001271
- Merz Investigative Site #1249
- Merz Investigative Site #001206
- Merz Investigative Site #1074
- Merz Investigative Site #001223
- Merz Investigative Site # 001216
- Merz Investigative Site# 001266
- Merz Investigative Site #001224
- Merz Investigative Site #1270
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Xeomin® Short Flex
Xeomin® Long Flex
Arm Description
short flex dosing of Xeomin. It is a botulinum toxin type A produced from fermentation of Hall strain Clostridium botulinum serotype A.
long flex dosing of Xeomin. It is a botulinum toxin type A produced from fermentation of Hall strain Clostridium botulinum serotype A.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Severity Subscale Score Based on Blinded Rater Assessment at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
The validated assessment scale TWSTRS was used to measure the impact of cervical dystonia (CD) on participants. A blinded rater performed all TWSTRS-Severity subscale assessments for a given participant. TWSTRS-Severity subscale score ranges from 0 (=absence of severity) to 35 points (=maximum severity).
Secondary Outcome Measures
Change From Baseline in TWSTRS Total Score Based on Blinded Rater Assessment at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
The validated assessment scale TWSTRS was used to measure the impact of CD on participants. The scale comprised of 3 subscales: Severity, Disability, and Pain, each of which was scored independently. A blinded rater performed all TWSTRS assessments for a given participant. TWSTRS-Severity subscale score ranges from 0 (=absence of severity) to 35 points (=maximum severity); TWSTRS-Disability subscale score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 30 (maximum disability); and TWSTRS-Pain subscale score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximum pain). The total of these 3 comprises the TWSTRS total score which is scored from 0 (no symptoms) to 85 (worst symptoms). Higher scores indicate a greater impact of CD on participant.
Change From Baseline in TWSTRS Total Score Based on Unblinded Rater Assessment at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
The validated assessment scale TWSTRS was used to measure the impact of CD on participant. The scale comprised of 3 subscales: Severity, Disability, and Pain, each of which was scored independently. An unblinded rater performed all TWSTRS assessments for a given participant. TWSTRS-Severity subscale score ranges from 0 (=absence of severity) to 35 points (=maximum severity); TWSTRS-Disability subscale score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 30 (maximum disability); and TWSTRS-Pain subscale score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximum pain). The total of these 3 comprises the TWSTRS total score which is scored from 0 (least symptoms) to 85 (worst symptoms). Higher scores indicate a greater impact of CD on participant.
Change From Baseline in TWSTRS Severity Subscale Based on Unblinded Rater Assessment at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
The validated assessment scale TWSTRS was used to measure the impact of cervical dystonia (CD) on participants. An unblinded rater performed all TWSTRS-Severity subscale assessments for a given participant. TWSTRS-Severity score ranges from 0 (absence of severity) to 35 (maximum severity).
Change From Baseline in TWSTRS Disability Subscale Based on Unblinded Rater Assessment at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
The validated assessment scale TWSTRS was used to measure the impact of CD on participant. An unblinded rater performed all TWSTRS-Disability subscale assessments for a given participant. TWSTRS-Disability score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 30 (maximum disability).
Change From Baseline in TWSTRS Pain Subscale Based on Unblinded Rater Assessment at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
The validated assessment scale TWSTRS was used to measure the impact of CD on participants. An unblinded rater performed all TWSTRS-Pain subscale assessments for a given participant. TWSTRS-Pain score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximum pain).
Change From Control Visit Week 4 After First Injection in Investigator-Rated Global Response at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
The Investigator-Rated Global Response assessment for each Xeomin treatment was scored using a 9-point scale with a score ranging from -4 to +4 as follows: -4 (very marked worsening); -3 (marked worsening); -2 (moderately worsening); 1 (minimally worsening); 0 (no change); +1 (minimally improved); +2 (moderately improved); +3 (significantly improved); +4 (complete abolishment of signs and symptoms).
Change From Control Visit Week 4 After First Injection in Subject-Rated Global Response at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
The Subject-Rated Global Response assessment for each Xeomin treatment was scored using a 9-point scale with a score ranging from -4 to +4 as follows: -4 (very marked worsening); -3 (marked worsening); -2 (moderately worsening); 1 (minimally worsening); 0 (no change); +1 (minimally improved); +2 (moderately improved); +3 (significantly improved); +4 (complete abolishment of signs and symptoms).
Change From Control Visit Week 4 After First Injection in Subject Satisfaction Score at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
The Subject Satisfaction assessment for each Xeomin treatment was scored using a 10-point scale to answer the question, "How satisfied are you at the moment with your current therapy? Score ranges from: 1 (completely satisfied) to 10 (completely unsatisfied).
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity
Assessment of Clinical Global Impression Severity was scored using a 7-point scale for severity of illness, in response to the question, "Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how ill is the participant at this time?" With scores as: 0 (not assessed); 1 (normal, not ill at all); 2 (borderline ill); 3 (mildly ill); 4 (moderately ill); 5 (markedly ill); 6 (severely ill); and 7 (among the most extremely ill participants).
Change From Baseline in Cervical Dystonia Impact Profile-58 (CDIP-58) Total Score at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
The CDIP-58 assesses the health impact of CD. The CDIP-58 is composed of eight domains: head and neck (6 items; 6 to 30 points), pain and discomfort (5 items; 5 to 25 points), upper limb activities (9 items; 9 to 45 points), walking (9 items; 9 to 45 points), sleep (4 items; 4 to 20 points), annoyance (8 items; 8 to 40 points), mood (7 items; 7 to 35 points), and psychosocial functioning (10 items; 10 to 50 points). Subscale scores were transformed to a common theoretical range of 0 (no impact) to 100 (most impact). Transformation to a 0 to 100 scale for the sum scores of the sub- and total scales were done using the following formula (all single items have scores from 1 to 5): S0 to 100 =25 * ([ SO / NI] - 1), S0 to 100 = transformed sum score. SO = sum score of the original sub- / total scale. NI = number of items in the sub- / total scale. Negative changes from the baseline total score indicate improvement in the impact of CD on health whereas positive changes indicate worsening.
Change From Baseline in CDIP-58 Subscales' Scores at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
The CDIP-58 assesses the health impact of CD. The CDIP-58 is composed of eight domains: head and neck (6 items; 6 to 30 points), pain and discomfort (5 items; 5 to 25 points), upper limb activities (9 items; 9 to 45 points), walking (9 items; 9 to 45 points), sleep (4 items; 4 to 20 points), annoyance (8 items; 8 to 40 points), mood (7 items; 7 to 35 points), and psychosocial functioning (10 items; 10 to 50 points). Subscale scores were transformed to a common theoretical range of 0 (no impact) to 100 (most impact). Negative changes from the baseline scores indicate improvement in the impact of CD on health whereas positive changes indicate worsening.
Time to Offset of Xeomin Effects by Injection Cycle
The Offset Questionnaire was a single question: "On most days last week, have you noticed that your CD symptoms are better, worse or the same as the week prior? Time to offset of effect was calculated from date of first onset of effect to date of offset of effects.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01486264
First Posted
December 2, 2011
Last Updated
October 26, 2022
Sponsor
Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH
Collaborators
Merz North America, Inc.
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01486264
Brief Title
Open-Label Non-Inferiority Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Xeomin® in Subjects With Cervical Dystonia Flex
Official Title
An Open-Label, Non-Inferiority Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Two Injection Schedules of Xeomin® (incobotulinumtoxinA) [Short Flex Versus Long Flex] in Subjects With Cervical Dystonia With < 10 Weeks of Benefit From OnabotulinumtoxinA Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 20, 2012 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 29, 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 29, 2016 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Merz Pharmaceuticals GmbH
Collaborators
Merz North America, Inc.
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This study will compare Xeomin®, a botulinum toxin medication, in shorter treatment intervals (Short Flex dosing) to the standard interval dosing (Long Flex dosing) to determine if the response to treatment is comparable in both how it works and any side effects. Xeomin® is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of cervical dystonia (CD). The use of Xeomin® is investigational in regards to shorter treatment intervals. An investigational use is one that is not approved by the FDA.
Detailed Description
Dystonia is a movement disorder which is characterized by sustained, involuntary muscle contractions which frequently causes twisting and repetitive movements or abnormal postures of the trunk, neck, face, or arms and legs. In focal dystonia, the abnormal movements involve a single area of the body. A commonly described form of focal dystonia is cervical dystonia (CD). Botulinum toxin treatment can be offered as a treatment option for the treatment of CD.
The current practice for botulinum toxin injection treatment is to inject patients every 3 months. However, not all patients receive continuing benefit from botulinum toxin injections for an entire 3 months. In a recent survey, approximately 45% of patients report that they would prefer a treatment cycle of less than 10 weeks.This study will compare Xeomin®, a botulinum toxin treatment, in shorter treatment intervals (Short Flex dosing) to the standard interval dosing (Long Flex dosing) to determine if the response to treatment is comparable in both how it works and any side effects. Xeomin® is approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of CD. The use of Xeomin® is investigational in regards to shorter treatment intervals. An investigational use is one that is not approved by the FDA.
The purpose of this research study is to evaluate the efficacy of the Short Flex dosing of Xeomin® compared to the Long Flex dosing regimen of Xeomin®, using a standard scale completed by the doctors and subjects as well as questionnaires that ask subjects to rate symptoms of CD.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cervical Dystonia
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
283 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Xeomin® Short Flex
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
short flex dosing of Xeomin. It is a botulinum toxin type A produced from fermentation of Hall strain Clostridium botulinum serotype A.
Arm Title
Xeomin® Long Flex
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
long flex dosing of Xeomin. It is a botulinum toxin type A produced from fermentation of Hall strain Clostridium botulinum serotype A.
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Xeomin®
Other Intervention Name(s)
botulinum toxin, botulinum toxin type A
Intervention Description
Xeomin is botulinum toxin type A produced from fermentation of Hall strain Clostridium botulinum serotype A
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Toronto Western Spasmodic Torticollis Rating Scale (TWSTRS) Severity Subscale Score Based on Blinded Rater Assessment at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
Description
The validated assessment scale TWSTRS was used to measure the impact of cervical dystonia (CD) on participants. A blinded rater performed all TWSTRS-Severity subscale assessments for a given participant. TWSTRS-Severity subscale score ranges from 0 (=absence of severity) to 35 points (=maximum severity).
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 4 after the 8th injection (Week 44 to 68 for Short Flex and Week 84 to 104 for Long Flex)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in TWSTRS Total Score Based on Blinded Rater Assessment at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
Description
The validated assessment scale TWSTRS was used to measure the impact of CD on participants. The scale comprised of 3 subscales: Severity, Disability, and Pain, each of which was scored independently. A blinded rater performed all TWSTRS assessments for a given participant. TWSTRS-Severity subscale score ranges from 0 (=absence of severity) to 35 points (=maximum severity); TWSTRS-Disability subscale score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 30 (maximum disability); and TWSTRS-Pain subscale score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximum pain). The total of these 3 comprises the TWSTRS total score which is scored from 0 (no symptoms) to 85 (worst symptoms). Higher scores indicate a greater impact of CD on participant.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 4 after the 8th injection (Week 44 to 68 for Short Flex and Week 84 to 104 for Long Flex)
Title
Change From Baseline in TWSTRS Total Score Based on Unblinded Rater Assessment at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
Description
The validated assessment scale TWSTRS was used to measure the impact of CD on participant. The scale comprised of 3 subscales: Severity, Disability, and Pain, each of which was scored independently. An unblinded rater performed all TWSTRS assessments for a given participant. TWSTRS-Severity subscale score ranges from 0 (=absence of severity) to 35 points (=maximum severity); TWSTRS-Disability subscale score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 30 (maximum disability); and TWSTRS-Pain subscale score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximum pain). The total of these 3 comprises the TWSTRS total score which is scored from 0 (least symptoms) to 85 (worst symptoms). Higher scores indicate a greater impact of CD on participant.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 4 after the 8th injection (Week 44 to 68 for Short Flex and Week 84 to 104 for Long Flex)
Title
Change From Baseline in TWSTRS Severity Subscale Based on Unblinded Rater Assessment at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
Description
The validated assessment scale TWSTRS was used to measure the impact of cervical dystonia (CD) on participants. An unblinded rater performed all TWSTRS-Severity subscale assessments for a given participant. TWSTRS-Severity score ranges from 0 (absence of severity) to 35 (maximum severity).
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 4 after the 8th injection (Week 44 to 68 for Short Flex and Week 84 to 104 for Long Flex)
Title
Change From Baseline in TWSTRS Disability Subscale Based on Unblinded Rater Assessment at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
Description
The validated assessment scale TWSTRS was used to measure the impact of CD on participant. An unblinded rater performed all TWSTRS-Disability subscale assessments for a given participant. TWSTRS-Disability score ranges from 0 (no disability) to 30 (maximum disability).
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 4 after the 8th injection (Week 44 to 68 for Short Flex and Week 84 to 104 for Long Flex)
Title
Change From Baseline in TWSTRS Pain Subscale Based on Unblinded Rater Assessment at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
Description
The validated assessment scale TWSTRS was used to measure the impact of CD on participants. An unblinded rater performed all TWSTRS-Pain subscale assessments for a given participant. TWSTRS-Pain score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 20 (maximum pain).
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 4 after the 8th injection (Week 44 to 68 for Short Flex and Week 84 to 104 for Long Flex)
Title
Change From Control Visit Week 4 After First Injection in Investigator-Rated Global Response at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
Description
The Investigator-Rated Global Response assessment for each Xeomin treatment was scored using a 9-point scale with a score ranging from -4 to +4 as follows: -4 (very marked worsening); -3 (marked worsening); -2 (moderately worsening); 1 (minimally worsening); 0 (no change); +1 (minimally improved); +2 (moderately improved); +3 (significantly improved); +4 (complete abolishment of signs and symptoms).
Time Frame
Week 4 and Week 4 after the 8th injection (Week 44 to 68 for Short Flex and Week 84 to 104 for Long Flex)
Title
Change From Control Visit Week 4 After First Injection in Subject-Rated Global Response at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
Description
The Subject-Rated Global Response assessment for each Xeomin treatment was scored using a 9-point scale with a score ranging from -4 to +4 as follows: -4 (very marked worsening); -3 (marked worsening); -2 (moderately worsening); 1 (minimally worsening); 0 (no change); +1 (minimally improved); +2 (moderately improved); +3 (significantly improved); +4 (complete abolishment of signs and symptoms).
Time Frame
Week 4 and Week 4 after the 8th injection (Week 44 to 68 for Short Flex and Week 84 to 104 for Long Flex)
Title
Change From Control Visit Week 4 After First Injection in Subject Satisfaction Score at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
Description
The Subject Satisfaction assessment for each Xeomin treatment was scored using a 10-point scale to answer the question, "How satisfied are you at the moment with your current therapy? Score ranges from: 1 (completely satisfied) to 10 (completely unsatisfied).
Time Frame
Week 4 and Week 4 after the 8th injection (Week 44 to 68 for Short Flex and Week 84 to 104 for Long Flex)
Title
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-Severity
Description
Assessment of Clinical Global Impression Severity was scored using a 7-point scale for severity of illness, in response to the question, "Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how ill is the participant at this time?" With scores as: 0 (not assessed); 1 (normal, not ill at all); 2 (borderline ill); 3 (mildly ill); 4 (moderately ill); 5 (markedly ill); 6 (severely ill); and 7 (among the most extremely ill participants).
Time Frame
Baseline and 8th injection (Week 44 for Short Flex and Week 84 for Long Flex)
Title
Change From Baseline in Cervical Dystonia Impact Profile-58 (CDIP-58) Total Score at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
Description
The CDIP-58 assesses the health impact of CD. The CDIP-58 is composed of eight domains: head and neck (6 items; 6 to 30 points), pain and discomfort (5 items; 5 to 25 points), upper limb activities (9 items; 9 to 45 points), walking (9 items; 9 to 45 points), sleep (4 items; 4 to 20 points), annoyance (8 items; 8 to 40 points), mood (7 items; 7 to 35 points), and psychosocial functioning (10 items; 10 to 50 points). Subscale scores were transformed to a common theoretical range of 0 (no impact) to 100 (most impact). Transformation to a 0 to 100 scale for the sum scores of the sub- and total scales were done using the following formula (all single items have scores from 1 to 5): S0 to 100 =25 * ([ SO / NI] - 1), S0 to 100 = transformed sum score. SO = sum score of the original sub- / total scale. NI = number of items in the sub- / total scale. Negative changes from the baseline total score indicate improvement in the impact of CD on health whereas positive changes indicate worsening.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 4 after the 8th injection (Week 44 to 68 for Short Flex and Week 84 to 104 for Long Flex)
Title
Change From Baseline in CDIP-58 Subscales' Scores at Week 4 After the 8th Injection
Description
The CDIP-58 assesses the health impact of CD. The CDIP-58 is composed of eight domains: head and neck (6 items; 6 to 30 points), pain and discomfort (5 items; 5 to 25 points), upper limb activities (9 items; 9 to 45 points), walking (9 items; 9 to 45 points), sleep (4 items; 4 to 20 points), annoyance (8 items; 8 to 40 points), mood (7 items; 7 to 35 points), and psychosocial functioning (10 items; 10 to 50 points). Subscale scores were transformed to a common theoretical range of 0 (no impact) to 100 (most impact). Negative changes from the baseline scores indicate improvement in the impact of CD on health whereas positive changes indicate worsening.
Time Frame
Baseline and Week 4 after the 8th injection (Week 44 to 68 for Short Flex and Week 84 to 104 for Long Flex)
Title
Time to Offset of Xeomin Effects by Injection Cycle
Description
The Offset Questionnaire was a single question: "On most days last week, have you noticed that your CD symptoms are better, worse or the same as the week prior? Time to offset of effect was calculated from date of first onset of effect to date of offset of effects.
Time Frame
Week 4 up to Week 112
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
81 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Documented clinical diagnosis of idiopathic or genetic Cervical Dystonia
Exclusion Criteria:
Current treatment with botulinum toxin of any type for any other indication (including aesthetic indications) and for any body region during the study.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michael Kulagowski, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Merz North America, Inc.
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site #001234
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35294-0017
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site 001017
City
Fountain Valley
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92708
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site #001225
City
Loma Linda
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92354-3450
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site #001219
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90033
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site # 001276
City
Manchester
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06040
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site #001231
City
Washington
State/Province
District of Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
20007
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site #001076
City
Boca Raton
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33486
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site #001019
City
Gainesville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32610
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site #001046
City
Jacksonville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32209
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site #001075
City
Melbourne
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32901
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site #001217
City
Port Charlotte
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33980
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site #1253
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33613
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site #001055
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30329
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site# 01255
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60611
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site #001215
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60612
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site # 01069
City
Des Moines
State/Province
Iowa
ZIP/Postal Code
50309
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site #001110
City
Overland Park
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66211
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site # 001071
City
Elkridge
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21075
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site # 001018
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48201-2153
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site #001030
City
Farmington Hills
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48334
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site # 0001275
City
Eagan
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55121
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site #1250
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site #001210
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site #001221
City
Albany
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
12208
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site #001233
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10003
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site #1256
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10029-6574
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site# 01252
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28207
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site #001005
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27705
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site# 01260
City
Raleigh
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27607
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site #001009
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27157
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site #1265
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45219
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site #001220
City
Tulsa
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
74136
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site #1033
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97239
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site #1251
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97239
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site # 0001271
City
Hershey
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
17033
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site #1249
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19107
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site #001206
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37232-2551
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site #1074
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75214
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site #001223
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75231
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site # 001216
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site# 001266
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site #001224
City
Kirkland
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98034
Country
United States
Facility Name
Merz Investigative Site #1270
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98122
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35330880
Citation
Comella C, Hauser RA, Isaacson SH, Truong D, Oguh O, Hui J, Molho ES, Brodsky M, Furr-Stimming E, Comes G, Hast MA, Charles D. Efficacy and safety of two incobotulinumtoxinA injection intervals in cervical dystonia patients with inadequate benefit from standard injection intervals of botulinum toxin: Phase 4, open-label, randomized, noninferiority study. Clin Park Relat Disord. 2022 Mar 14;6:100142. doi: 10.1016/j.prdoa.2022.100142. eCollection 2022.
Results Reference
result
Learn more about this trial
Open-Label Non-Inferiority Study Evaluating the Efficacy and Safety of Xeomin® in Subjects With Cervical Dystonia Flex
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs