search
Back to results

Assessment of Fixation Strategies for Severe Open Tibia Fractures (FIXIT)

Primary Purpose

Severe Open Fractures of the Tibia (Shin) Bone

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Surgery with an external ring fixator
Definitive fixation with a locked IM nail or plate
Sponsored by
Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Severe Open Fractures of the Tibia (Shin) Bone focused on measuring External ring fixation, internal fixation, traumatic tibia fracture

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 64 Years (Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. All open tibia fractures meeting at least one of 1 the following criteria:

    • Diaphyseal or metaphyseal Type IIIB (Gustilo IIIB Fractures are open fractures that require either a rotational or free flap for coverage of a soft tissue defect).
    • Diaphyseal or metaphyseal Type IIIA where extensive contamination or muscle damage (e.g. all military injuries from IED) precludes nail/plate placement at first debridement.
    • Diaphyseal or metaphyseal Type IIIA, where injury would have been classified as a IIIB, but because enough muscle was removed, the skin could be closed.
    • Diaphyseal or metaphyseal Type IIIA, where after debridement, bone gap is greater than 1cm.
    • Diaphyseal or metaphyseal Type IIIA, where fasciotomies were performed for impending or diagnosed compartment syndrome, and wounds could not be closed primarily (i.e. needs skin grafting).
  2. Ages 18 - 64 years inclusive
  3. Study fracture is suitable for limb salvage using either a modern ring external fixator or internal fixation (internal fixation =locked intramedullary nail or plate).

Inclusion notes:

  1. Patients may have co-existing non-tibial infection, with or without antibiotic treatment.
  2. Patients may have risk factors for infection including diabetes, immunosuppression from steroids or other medications, HIV, or other infections.
  3. Patients may have a traumatic brain injury.
  4. Patients may be treated initially with a temporary external fixator prior to randomization.
  5. Patients may be treated initially at an outside institution prior to transfer to the study institution, as long as the definitive fixation was not performed prior to entrance into the study.
  6. Patients with bilateral injuries that meet inclusion criteria may be included, but only the limb rated as "more severe" by the treating surgeon will be enrolled in the study.
  7. Fractures may have a gap after debridement of any size, including no gap.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients presenting with a traumatic amputation of the tibia
  2. Patients already received definitive fixation with an IM nail, plate or ring fixator prior to study enrollment
  3. Tibia already infected as diagnosed by a surgeon and currently receiving treatment for it
  4. Patient speaks neither English nor Spanish
  5. Patient is a prisoner
  6. Patient has been diagnosed with a severe psychiatric condition
  7. Patient is intellectually challenged without adequate family support
  8. Patient lives outside the catchment area
  9. Non-ambulatory patient due to an associated complete spinal cord injury
  10. Non-ambulatory before the injury due to a pre-existing condition.
  11. Complex pilon and plateau fractures. The study tibia fracture may have extension into the joint surface, but should primarily be a metaphyseal or diaphyseal fracture and not have an ipsilateral tibial plateau or pilon fracture.Contralateral tibial plateau and pilon fractures are allowed

Sites / Locations

  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • Naval Medical Center San Diego
  • UCSF Medical Center
  • Denver Health and Hospital Authority
  • University of Miami Ryder Trauma Center
  • Orlando Regional Medical Center
  • Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Tampa General Hospital
  • Eskenazi Health
  • OrthoIndy / Methodist Hospital
  • St Vincent Hospital
  • University of Maryland, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center
  • Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
  • Boston Medical Center
  • Hennepin County Medical Center / Minneapolis
  • Regions Hospital
  • University of Mississippi Medical Center
  • St. Louis Medical Center
  • Mission Hospital
  • Carolinas Medical Center
  • Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center
  • MetroHealth Medical Center
  • Geisinger Health System
  • Penn State University M.S. Hershey Medical Center
  • Allegheny General Hospital
  • University of Pittsburgh
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center
  • University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
  • Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
  • San Antonio Military Medical Center
  • UT Health: The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Medical School
  • University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio
  • Naval Medical Center Portsmouth
  • University of Wisconsin

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Treament Arm 1

Treatment arm 2

Arm Description

Definitive fixation with an external ring fixator.

Definitive fixation with a locked IM nail or plate

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Re-hospitalization for Complication.
A hospital re-admission for a complication is defined as any re-admission to the hospital secondary to the treatment of the open tibia fracture for a defined set of complications. The list of complications includes: amputation (at any level), infection (defined using CDC criteria), flap failure, non-union, mal-union, loss of reduction, or hardware failure.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Infection.
Infection is defined as either deep or superficial. The presence of tibia infection will be defined by the criteria of CDC. Deep infections are further defined as those that require operative treatment. Superficial infections are defined as those that are treated only with local antibiotics and wound care, and no operative treatment for the infection.
Fracture Healing.
Fractures will be evaluated with standard 2 view radiographs of the tibia as is currently performed in standard practice at every clinic visit after the 2 week follow-up. Fracture healing is measured by the treating surgeon using standard clinical criteria.
Limb Function.
Limb function will be measured using standard clinical assessments to include weight bearing and ambulation status, knee and ankle range of motion and self selected walking speed.
Patient Reported Outcome and Quality of Life.
Outcomes from the patients' perspective will be assessed using standardized questionnaires including the VR-12, the SMFA, and the Paffenbarger activity scale. Depression will be assessed using the PHQ. Post traumatic stress will be measured using the PCL-S.
Pain
Pain will be measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS), the brief pain inventory (BPI) and documentation of use of pain medications.
Satisfaction with treatment
Patient satisfaction with treatment will be measured using the Short Form Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-18).
Health Care Costs
Costs for the initial hospitalization and subsequent care will be estimated using electronic billing records and self reported health service utilization.

Full Information

First Posted
August 25, 2011
Last Updated
February 5, 2019
Sponsor
Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium
Collaborators
United States Department of Defense
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01494519
Brief Title
Assessment of Fixation Strategies for Severe Open Tibia Fractures
Acronym
FIXIT
Official Title
A Prospective Randomized Trial to Assess Fixation Strategies for Severe Open Tibia Fractures:Modern Ring External Fixators Versus Internal Fixation
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
July 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
September 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium
Collaborators
United States Department of Defense

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the use of modern ring external fixation versus internal fixation for fracture stabilization of severe open tibia fractures.
Detailed Description
Severe open fractures of the tibia (shin) bone are difficult to treat and are associated with high rates of infection and other complications. There is controversy regarding the best treatment, particularly in fractures with large wounds from trauma. The two current standard treatment options are to place an internal fixation device (a nail or plates with screws) or to use a device with pins that stick out of the skin and attach to rings outside the body (modern ring external fixator). It is unknown which of these standard of care treatment options will result in lower complication rates and better function of the leg. Our goal is to perform a multi-center randomized controlled trial of the use of modern ring external fixation versus internal fixation for fracture stabilization of severe open tibia fractures. Patients who refuse randomization have the option of participating in a prospective observational study and the treatment is decided by the surgeon and patient. Primary Aim: To compare the outcomes associated with modern ring external fixators versus standard internal fixation techniques in treating "severe" open tibia shaft or metaphyseal fractures with or without a bone defect of any size. Primary Hypothesis: Among patients with open tibia shaft or metaphyseal fractures (with or without a bone defect of any size), the rate of re-hospitalization for major limb complications will be lower for patients treated with ring fixators than those treated with standard internal fixation. Secondary Hypotheses: Among patients with open tibia shaft or metaphyseal fractures (with or without a bone defect of any size), the overall rate of infections will be lower for patients treated with ring fixators than those treated with standard internal fixation. Measures of fracture healing, limb function, and patient reported outcomes (including pain) will be as good or better among patients treated with ring fixators than those treated with standard internal fixation. Secondary Aim #1: To determine the percentage of Gustilo IIIB open tibia shaft fractures that can be treated successfully (i.e. without amputation) without a soft tissue flap secondary to the use of ring external fixators. Secondary Aim #2: To determine the two-year treatment costs associated with fixation of "severe" open tibia shaft or metaphyseal fractures (with or without a bone defect of any size) using modern ring external fixators versus standard internal fixation techniques. Secondary Aim #3: To determine patient reported levels of satisfaction with the fixation method and overall treatment and to compare satisfaction between the two treatment groups.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Severe Open Fractures of the Tibia (Shin) Bone
Keywords
External ring fixation, internal fixation, traumatic tibia fracture

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
442 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Treament Arm 1
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Definitive fixation with an external ring fixator.
Arm Title
Treatment arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Definitive fixation with a locked IM nail or plate
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Surgery with an external ring fixator
Intervention Description
Modern ring external fixator is defined as any fixator that has at least 1 ring proximal and 1 ring distal to the fracture site. The rings may be connected to the tibia using any combination of external fixation pins or wires at the surgeon's discretion. There must be at least two pins or wires connected to each ring, and typically there will be at least three pins or wires. Any FDA approved ring fixator meeting this definition from any manufacturer is allowed.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Definitive fixation with a locked IM nail or plate
Intervention Description
Eligible patients with tibial diaphyseal fractures will typically receive a standard locked IM Nail. The nail must use at least one static interlock proximal to and one static interlock distal to the fracture site. The nail may be placed with either a reamed or unreamed technique. Methaphyseal fractures, especially those with fracture lines extending into the joint may be more commonly treated with plate fixation. The plate may be applied in an open or percutaneous fashion. Any combination of locked and/or non-locked screws may be used.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Re-hospitalization for Complication.
Description
A hospital re-admission for a complication is defined as any re-admission to the hospital secondary to the treatment of the open tibia fracture for a defined set of complications. The list of complications includes: amputation (at any level), infection (defined using CDC criteria), flap failure, non-union, mal-union, loss of reduction, or hardware failure.
Time Frame
2 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Infection.
Description
Infection is defined as either deep or superficial. The presence of tibia infection will be defined by the criteria of CDC. Deep infections are further defined as those that require operative treatment. Superficial infections are defined as those that are treated only with local antibiotics and wound care, and no operative treatment for the infection.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Fracture Healing.
Description
Fractures will be evaluated with standard 2 view radiographs of the tibia as is currently performed in standard practice at every clinic visit after the 2 week follow-up. Fracture healing is measured by the treating surgeon using standard clinical criteria.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Limb Function.
Description
Limb function will be measured using standard clinical assessments to include weight bearing and ambulation status, knee and ankle range of motion and self selected walking speed.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Patient Reported Outcome and Quality of Life.
Description
Outcomes from the patients' perspective will be assessed using standardized questionnaires including the VR-12, the SMFA, and the Paffenbarger activity scale. Depression will be assessed using the PHQ. Post traumatic stress will be measured using the PCL-S.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Pain
Description
Pain will be measured using the visual analogue scale (VAS), the brief pain inventory (BPI) and documentation of use of pain medications.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Satisfaction with treatment
Description
Patient satisfaction with treatment will be measured using the Short Form Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire (PSQ-18).
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Health Care Costs
Description
Costs for the initial hospitalization and subsequent care will be estimated using electronic billing records and self reported health service utilization.
Time Frame
2 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
64 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: All open tibia fractures meeting at least one of 1 the following criteria: Diaphyseal or metaphyseal Type IIIB (Gustilo IIIB Fractures are open fractures that require either a rotational or free flap for coverage of a soft tissue defect). Diaphyseal or metaphyseal Type IIIA where extensive contamination or muscle damage (e.g. all military injuries from IED) precludes nail/plate placement at first debridement. Diaphyseal or metaphyseal Type IIIA, where injury would have been classified as a IIIB, but because enough muscle was removed, the skin could be closed. Diaphyseal or metaphyseal Type IIIA, where after debridement, bone gap is greater than 1cm. Diaphyseal or metaphyseal Type IIIA, where fasciotomies were performed for impending or diagnosed compartment syndrome, and wounds could not be closed primarily (i.e. needs skin grafting). Ages 18 - 64 years inclusive Study fracture is suitable for limb salvage using either a modern ring external fixator or internal fixation (internal fixation =locked intramedullary nail or plate). Inclusion notes: Patients may have co-existing non-tibial infection, with or without antibiotic treatment. Patients may have risk factors for infection including diabetes, immunosuppression from steroids or other medications, HIV, or other infections. Patients may have a traumatic brain injury. Patients may be treated initially with a temporary external fixator prior to randomization. Patients may be treated initially at an outside institution prior to transfer to the study institution, as long as the definitive fixation was not performed prior to entrance into the study. Patients with bilateral injuries that meet inclusion criteria may be included, but only the limb rated as "more severe" by the treating surgeon will be enrolled in the study. Fractures may have a gap after debridement of any size, including no gap. Exclusion Criteria: Patients presenting with a traumatic amputation of the tibia Patients already received definitive fixation with an IM nail, plate or ring fixator prior to study enrollment Tibia already infected as diagnosed by a surgeon and currently receiving treatment for it Patient speaks neither English nor Spanish Patient is a prisoner Patient has been diagnosed with a severe psychiatric condition Patient is intellectually challenged without adequate family support Patient lives outside the catchment area Non-ambulatory patient due to an associated complete spinal cord injury Non-ambulatory before the injury due to a pre-existing condition. Complex pilon and plateau fractures. The study tibia fracture may have extension into the joint surface, but should primarily be a metaphyseal or diaphyseal fracture and not have an ipsilateral tibial plateau or pilon fracture.Contralateral tibial plateau and pilon fractures are allowed
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lisa Reider, MHS, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Major Extremity Trauma Research Consortium
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Alabama at Birmingham
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35294
Country
United States
Facility Name
Naval Medical Center San Diego
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92134
Country
United States
Facility Name
UCSF Medical Center
City
San Francisco
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94115
Country
United States
Facility Name
Denver Health and Hospital Authority
City
Denver
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80204
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Miami Ryder Trauma Center
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33101
Country
United States
Facility Name
Orlando Regional Medical Center
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32806
Country
United States
Facility Name
Florida Orthopaedic Institute, Tampa General Hospital
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33606
Country
United States
Facility Name
Eskenazi Health
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46202
Country
United States
Facility Name
OrthoIndy / Methodist Hospital
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46202
Country
United States
Facility Name
St Vincent Hospital
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46260
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Maryland, R Adams Cowley Shock Trauma Center
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Walter Reed National Military Medical Center
City
Bethesda
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
20889
Country
United States
Facility Name
Boston Medical Center
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02118
Country
United States
Facility Name
Hennepin County Medical Center / Minneapolis
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55415
Country
United States
Facility Name
Regions Hospital
City
Saint Paul
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55101
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Mississippi Medical Center
City
Jackson
State/Province
Mississippi
ZIP/Postal Code
39216
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Louis Medical Center
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mission Hospital
City
Asheville
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28801
Country
United States
Facility Name
Carolinas Medical Center
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28232
Country
United States
Facility Name
Wake Forest University Baptist Medical Center
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27157-1070
Country
United States
Facility Name
MetroHealth Medical Center
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44109
Country
United States
Facility Name
Geisinger Health System
City
Danville
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
17822
Country
United States
Facility Name
Penn State University M.S. Hershey Medical Center
City
Hershey
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
17033
Country
United States
Facility Name
Allegheny General Hospital
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15212
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Pittsburgh
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15213
Country
United States
Facility Name
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37232
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75390
Country
United States
Facility Name
Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center
City
El Paso
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
79905
Country
United States
Facility Name
San Antonio Military Medical Center
City
Fort Sam Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78234-6315
Country
United States
Facility Name
UT Health: The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston Medical School
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Texas Health Science Center, San Antonio
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78229
Country
United States
Facility Name
Naval Medical Center Portsmouth
City
Portsmouth
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23708
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Wisconsin
City
Madison
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53705
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Assessment of Fixation Strategies for Severe Open Tibia Fractures

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs