search
Back to results

Knee Articular Cartilage Repair: Cartilage Autograft Implantation System Versus Conventional Microfracture (CAIS)

Primary Purpose

Other Articular Cartilage Disorders, Osteochondritis Dissecans

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Singapore
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Microfracture
Cartilage Autograft Implantation System (CAIS)
Sponsored by
Singapore General Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Other Articular Cartilage Disorders focused on measuring Cartilage, Articular

Eligibility Criteria

21 Years - 50 Years (Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Full-thickness articular cartilage defect on the femoral condyle or trochlea greater than 2 cm2 but less than 10 cm2 in total surface area, following debridement to healthy, stable tissue.
  • Knee mechanical axis malalignment of not more than 3 degrees either varus or valgus from neutral.
  • Patient is fit for surgery.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Multifocal disease
  • Tibial plateau lesions
  • Patella lesions
  • Absent menisci or meniscal tears that are unstable and cannot be successfully debrided
  • Non-intact cruciate and collateral ligaments
  • Inflammatory or crystalline arthropathy
  • Systemic medication or conditions likely to compromise chondrocyte cell proliferation and differentiation, e.g. Cushing's syndrome, chemotherapy
  • Morbid obesity (more than 150% ideal body weight)

Sites / Locations

  • Singapore General HospitalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Randomized to Microfracture

Randomized to CAIS

Arm Description

This group of patients who have been randomised to receive microfracture procedure will be the control group for this study

This group of patients who have been randomised to receive the CAIS procedure will be the experimental group for this study

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

MR Observations of Cartilage Repair Tissue
The MOCART (MR Observations of Cartilage Repair Tissue) scoring system, which has been well validated in studies of cartilage regeneration techniques, will be used to assess the cartilage repair response
MR Observations of Cartilage Repair Tissue
The MOCART (MR Observations of Cartilage Repair Tissue) scoring system, which has been well validated in studies of cartilage regeneration techniques, will be used to assess the cartilage repair response
MR Observations of Cartilage Repair Tissue
The MOCART (MR Observations of Cartilage Repair Tissue) scoring system, which has been well validated in studies of cartilage regeneration techniques, will be used to assess the cartilage repair response

Secondary Outcome Measures

Assessment of whole leg mechanical alignment
Standard weight-bearing plain radiographs of the knee, as well as long leg standing films to assess mechanical alignment, will also be performed.
Assessment of whole leg mechanical alignment
Standard weight-bearing plain radiographs of the knee, as well as long leg standing films to assess mechanical alignment, will also be performed.
Assessment of whole leg mechanical alignment
Standard weight-bearing plain radiographs of the knee, as well as long leg standing films to assess mechanical alignment, will also be performed.
Assessment of whole leg mechanical alignment
Standard weight-bearing plain radiographs of the knee, as well as long leg standing films to assess mechanical alignment, will also be performed.
Assessment of whole leg mechanical alignment
Standard weight-bearing plain radiographs of the knee, as well as long leg standing films to assess mechanical alignment, will also be performed.
Clinical and functional evaluation using standardised and validated scoring system
Pre- and post-operative assessment (1,3,6 and 12 months) of the diseased knee will be performed using standardised, validated scoring systems: SF-36 (general health), KOOS and ICRS (disease-specific) scores
Clinical and functional evaluation using standardised and validated scoring system
Pre- and post-operative assessment (1,3,6 and 12 months) of the diseased knee will be performed using standardised, validated scoring systems: SF-36 (general health), KOOS and ICRS (disease-specific) scores
Clinical and functional evaluation using standardised and validated scoring system
Pre- and post-operative assessment (1,3,6 and 12 months) of the diseased knee will be performed using standardised, validated scoring systems: SF-36 (general health), KOOS and ICRS (disease-specific) scores
Clinical and functional evaluation using standardised and validated scoring system
Pre- and post-operative assessment (1,3,6 and 12 months) of the diseased knee will be performed using standardised, validated scoring systems: SF-36 (general health), KOOS and ICRS (disease-specific) scores
Clinical and functional evaluation using standardised and validated scoring system
Pre- and post-operative assessment (1,3,6 and 12 months) of the diseased knee will be performed using standardised, validated scoring systems: SF-36 (general health), KOOS and ICRS (disease-specific) scores

Full Information

First Posted
December 7, 2011
Last Updated
March 20, 2012
Sponsor
Singapore General Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01498029
Brief Title
Knee Articular Cartilage Repair: Cartilage Autograft Implantation System Versus Conventional Microfracture
Acronym
CAIS
Official Title
A Randomised Clinical Trial Comparing a Novel Single-stage Autologous Cartilage Implantation System to Conventional Microfracture for Repair of Articular Cartilage Defects in the Knee
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2011
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
January 2012 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2013 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2014 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Singapore General Hospital

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The Cartilage Autograft Implantation System (CAIS) is a single-stage procedure in which cartilage is harvested from non-critical regions of articular cartilage, but then immediately morcellated and loaded onto a polymer membrane-scaffold, which is subsequently used to fill the chondral defect. The autograft-membrane composite is fixed to the defect with a biodegradable staple. The investigators aim to evaluate this new technique through a pilot clinical trial involving 36 patients randomized into microfracture and CAIS treatment arms (randomisation ratio 1:2), with a minimum follow-up of 1 year, using both clinical and radiological (magnetic resonance imaging) outcomes. If the results of this pilot trial are successful, the investigators plan to expand the study by recruiting more patients to achieve a suitably-powered trial. Primary hypothesis 1: That functional scores will increase by at least 0.5 SD over pre-operative values, by 1 year following the CAIS procedure Primary hypothesis 2: That articular cartilage height will have a sustained increase of at least 2 mm at 1 year following the CAIS procedure Primary hypothesis 3: That functional scores in the CAIS group will be equivalent or superior to those in the microfracture group
Detailed Description
Articular cartilage has limited potential for regeneration, and full-thickness cartilage defects in the knee are frequently symptomatic and debilitating. If left untreated, such injuries may progress to generalized osteoarthritis. The management of these injuries remains unsatisfactory despite intense research activity, and the clinical and social impact of this problem is growing, involving as it often does the young and the active. Numerous surgical techniques have been developed to treat these injuries, but none has yet been shown to be superior. One of the most widely employed and best-studied means of achieving cartilage repair in patients with discrete regions of chondral destruction in the knee is that of microfracture. Microfracture is an arthroscopic technique that involves penetrating the subchondral bone at the base of full-thickness articular cartilage defects, thus allowing marrow pluripotent stem cells to egress into the chondral defect, facilitating cartilage repair. However, doubts have been raised concerning the quality and durability of the microfracture-induced repair tissue. In recent years, autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) has emerged as the technique with the greatest potential for advancing the management of chondral injury. In this procedure, autologous chondrocytes are harvested from non-critical areas on the articular surface, then expanded through cell culture in the laboratory, before being implanted 4-6 weeks later into the chondral defect, using a 'patch' of adjacent periosteum for containment of the cells within the defect. There are several disadvantages to the ACI technique just described: it is a two-stage procedure, chondrocyte culture can be lengthy and expensive, and the periosteal patch used to contain the cells is associated with a significant risk of complications such as detachment and hypertrophy. 2nd generation ACI techniques have focused on addressing some of these problems by substituting the periosteum patch with artificial membranes that served as scaffolds for the cultured chondrocytes. A novel technique has recently been developed that could prove to avoid some of the deficiencies of the ACI technique. The Cartilage Autograft Implantation System (CAIS) is a single-stage procedure in which cartilage is harvested from non-critical regions of articular cartilage, but then immediately morcellated and loaded onto a polymer membrane-scaffold, which is subsequently used to fill the chondral defect. The autograft-membrane composite is fixed to the defect with a biodegradable staple. We aim to evaluate this new technique through a pilot clinical trial involving 36 patients randomized into microfracture and CAIS treatment arms (randomisation ratio 1:2), with a minimum follow-up of 1 year, using both clinical and radiological (magnetic resonance imaging) outcomes. If the results of this pilot trial are successful, we plan to expand the study by recruiting more patients to achieve a suitably-powered trial. Primary hypothesis 1: That functional scores will increase by at least 0.5 SD over pre-operative values, by 1 year following the CAIS procedure Primary hypothesis 2: That articular cartilage height will have a sustained increase of at least 2 mm at 1 year following the CAIS procedure Primary hypothesis 3: That functional scores in the CAIS group will be equivalent or superior to those in the microfracture group

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Other Articular Cartilage Disorders, Osteochondritis Dissecans
Keywords
Cartilage, Articular

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
36 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Randomized to Microfracture
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
This group of patients who have been randomised to receive microfracture procedure will be the control group for this study
Arm Title
Randomized to CAIS
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
This group of patients who have been randomised to receive the CAIS procedure will be the experimental group for this study
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Microfracture
Other Intervention Name(s)
Knee, Cartilage, Cartilage Repair
Intervention Description
The microfracture procedure is a standard method for treatment of cartilage damage in which the surgeon will clean the site of your cartilage damage and then will make several small holes in your bone to stimulate your bone marrow with the intention to repair the damaged area with new cartilage tissue
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Cartilage Autograft Implantation System (CAIS)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Knee, Cartilage, Cartilage Repair
Intervention Description
The Cartilage Autograft Implantation System (CAIS) is a kit of devices that utilizes morselized autologous hyaline cartilage harvested arthroscopically, affixed onto a synthetic, resorbable implant using a fibrin sealant and implanted in a single surgical procedure. The system is designed as a surgical treatment of damaged knee cartilage using the subject's own healthy cartilage obtained from a non-weight or low weight-bearing region.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
MR Observations of Cartilage Repair Tissue
Description
The MOCART (MR Observations of Cartilage Repair Tissue) scoring system, which has been well validated in studies of cartilage regeneration techniques, will be used to assess the cartilage repair response
Time Frame
3 weeks post operative
Title
MR Observations of Cartilage Repair Tissue
Description
The MOCART (MR Observations of Cartilage Repair Tissue) scoring system, which has been well validated in studies of cartilage regeneration techniques, will be used to assess the cartilage repair response
Time Frame
6 months post-operative
Title
MR Observations of Cartilage Repair Tissue
Description
The MOCART (MR Observations of Cartilage Repair Tissue) scoring system, which has been well validated in studies of cartilage regeneration techniques, will be used to assess the cartilage repair response
Time Frame
1 year post-operative
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Assessment of whole leg mechanical alignment
Description
Standard weight-bearing plain radiographs of the knee, as well as long leg standing films to assess mechanical alignment, will also be performed.
Time Frame
1 week prior to surgery
Title
Assessment of whole leg mechanical alignment
Description
Standard weight-bearing plain radiographs of the knee, as well as long leg standing films to assess mechanical alignment, will also be performed.
Time Frame
1 month post-operative
Title
Assessment of whole leg mechanical alignment
Description
Standard weight-bearing plain radiographs of the knee, as well as long leg standing films to assess mechanical alignment, will also be performed.
Time Frame
3 month post-operative
Title
Assessment of whole leg mechanical alignment
Description
Standard weight-bearing plain radiographs of the knee, as well as long leg standing films to assess mechanical alignment, will also be performed.
Time Frame
6 month post-operative
Title
Assessment of whole leg mechanical alignment
Description
Standard weight-bearing plain radiographs of the knee, as well as long leg standing films to assess mechanical alignment, will also be performed.
Time Frame
1 year post-operative
Title
Clinical and functional evaluation using standardised and validated scoring system
Description
Pre- and post-operative assessment (1,3,6 and 12 months) of the diseased knee will be performed using standardised, validated scoring systems: SF-36 (general health), KOOS and ICRS (disease-specific) scores
Time Frame
1 week prior to surgery
Title
Clinical and functional evaluation using standardised and validated scoring system
Description
Pre- and post-operative assessment (1,3,6 and 12 months) of the diseased knee will be performed using standardised, validated scoring systems: SF-36 (general health), KOOS and ICRS (disease-specific) scores
Time Frame
1 month post-operative
Title
Clinical and functional evaluation using standardised and validated scoring system
Description
Pre- and post-operative assessment (1,3,6 and 12 months) of the diseased knee will be performed using standardised, validated scoring systems: SF-36 (general health), KOOS and ICRS (disease-specific) scores
Time Frame
3 month post-operative
Title
Clinical and functional evaluation using standardised and validated scoring system
Description
Pre- and post-operative assessment (1,3,6 and 12 months) of the diseased knee will be performed using standardised, validated scoring systems: SF-36 (general health), KOOS and ICRS (disease-specific) scores
Time Frame
6 month post-operative
Title
Clinical and functional evaluation using standardised and validated scoring system
Description
Pre- and post-operative assessment (1,3,6 and 12 months) of the diseased knee will be performed using standardised, validated scoring systems: SF-36 (general health), KOOS and ICRS (disease-specific) scores
Time Frame
1 year post-operative

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
50 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Full-thickness articular cartilage defect on the femoral condyle or trochlea greater than 2 cm2 but less than 10 cm2 in total surface area, following debridement to healthy, stable tissue. Knee mechanical axis malalignment of not more than 3 degrees either varus or valgus from neutral. Patient is fit for surgery. Exclusion Criteria: Multifocal disease Tibial plateau lesions Patella lesions Absent menisci or meniscal tears that are unstable and cannot be successfully debrided Non-intact cruciate and collateral ligaments Inflammatory or crystalline arthropathy Systemic medication or conditions likely to compromise chondrocyte cell proliferation and differentiation, e.g. Cushing's syndrome, chemotherapy Morbid obesity (more than 150% ideal body weight)
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Shi-Lu Chia, PhD, MBBS
Phone
+65 98171 102
Email
chia.shi.lu@sgh.com.sg
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Shi-Lu Chia, PhD, MBBS
Organizational Affiliation
Singapore General Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Singapore General Hospital
City
Singapore
ZIP/Postal Code
169608
Country
Singapore
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Shi-Lu Chia, PhD, MBBS
Phone
+65 9817 1102
Email
chia.shi.lu@sgh.com.sg
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Shi-Lu Chia, PhD, MBBS
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Seng Jin Yeo, FRCS, MBBS
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Zhihong Zhou, BEng
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Andy Yew, PhD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Knee Articular Cartilage Repair: Cartilage Autograft Implantation System Versus Conventional Microfracture

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs