search
Back to results

The Involvement of Breast Cancer Patients During Oncological Consultations (INCA)

Primary Purpose

Breast Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
prompt-sheet
control group
Sponsored by
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Breast Cancer focused on measuring Breast cancer, Patient involvement, Question prompt-sheet, Doctor-patient communication, RCT

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • all consecutive patients
  • age between 18 and 75 years
  • attending the Oncology Out-patient Clinics of the participating centres
  • recent diagnosis of breast cancer at an early stage

Exclusion Criteria:

  • presence of metastasis or relapse
  • severe mental deterioration
  • comprehension difficulties of the Italian language.

Sites / Locations

  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Other

Arm Label

prompt-sheet

control group

Arm Description

Patients and companions of intervention group receive a form on which to write their reply to the following request: "Please indicate the arguments which you want to discuss today with your oncologist" and the prompt sheet. An introduction explains the importance of asking questions during the consultations. The patient (companion) is invited to select among a written list of about 50 possible questions those, if any, s/he would like to ask today to the oncology.

Patients and companions of the control group receive a form on which to write their reply to the following request: "Please indicate the arguments which you want to discuss today with your oncologist"

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

number of question during the consultation
The intervention prompt-sheet aims to increase the number of question by giving the opportunity to patients and companions to reflect on their informative needs on the basis of a wide range of possible questions from which to choose those perceived as most relevant in view of the subsequent consultation. Question asking is considered an index for patient participation during the consultation. The total number of patient questions during the consultation regarding diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and other issues is the primary outcome measure.

Secondary Outcome Measures

The number of informative needs not met during the consultation.
This measure is derived by comparing the number of questions indicated by patients and their companion before the consultation with those actually raised during the consultation
Ability to cope with the illness
the Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) is a questionnaire of six items on a Likert scale from 0 (same or less) to 2 (much better, much more), administered after the consultation.
Patient involvement (SDM-Q and OPTION)
The SDM-Q is a self administered questionnaire of 9 items on a Likert scale from 1 to 6 and assesses patients' perception of the decisional process and their level of involvement during the consultation. The OPTION Scale is composed of 12 items of operational definitions of different patient involving skills, rated on a Likert scale from 0 to 4. The scale is applied by trained raters to the audio-recording of the consultation
Satisfaction with decisions (SWD).
Satisfaction with Decision Scale (SWD) is a questionnaireof 6 items on a Likert scale from 0 (completely disagree) to 5 (agree completely), administered after the consultation.
Recalling and understanding of information
The Recall Questionnaire consists of six questions which ask the patient's to recall the received information on treatment decisions and pathology. We added three other questions, rated on a 0 (no at al) to 5 (very much) likert scale asking whether the patient succeeded in their purpose of question asking, whether the oncologist answered the questions properly and how much more information she would have needed.
Overall consultation atmosphere (VR-COPE, RIAS, AIMIT on the audio-recorded consultation)
VRCOPE assesses the content, the process and relational aspects of patient-centred communication during medical consultations on the basis of a multidimensional evaluation and comprises nine items. RIAS is a coding system of medical consultations, composed by 40 categories describing interactions between doctors and patients. AIMIT is a coding system to assess in the therapeutic dialogue the activity of interpersonal motivational systems that guide the verbal and non verbal behaviors during interactions.
Perceived Patient-doctor relationship (PDRQ-9 and DDPRQ-10)
PDRQ-9 is a self-administered (after the consultation) questionnaire of 9 items on a Likert scale from 1 to 5, to measure the relationship between the doctor and the patient, from a patient point of view.The DDPRQ-10 is a self-report instrument of 10 items on a Likert scale from 1 to 6, completed by physicians after an encounter with a patient.
Perceived role preference of the patient (CPS)
CPS (Oncologist version) assesses how the oncologist perceives the role that patient might prefer regarding the decision making process.

Full Information

First Posted
December 22, 2011
Last Updated
August 9, 2013
Sponsor
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01510964
Brief Title
The Involvement of Breast Cancer Patients During Oncological Consultations
Acronym
INCA
Official Title
The Involvement of Breast Cancer Patients During Oncological Consultations. A Multi-centre Randomized Controlled Trial. The Study Protocol
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2011
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2013 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata Verona

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The main aim of the study is to assess if a pre consultation intervention facilitates greater participation of patients (and accompanying key persons when present) in the consultation process by determining an increase in questioning and/or in the number of different illness related issues (e.g. diagnosis, treatment, prognosis) being discussed with the oncologist. Other aims are to assess the effect of the intervention on the oncologist's level of patient involvement, on patient satisfaction and coping and to explore the role of key persons accompanying the patient. The investigators expect that patients who have the opportunity to rehearse their informative needs before the consultation will ask a greater number of questions which in turn will determine their greater involvement by the physician and a greater number of satisfied needs. The investigators expect also that the straightforward use of a list of printed questions of potential relevance for cancer patients and their companions at an early stage of illness, by modifying the process of information exchange, increases their participation and satisfaction with the consultation, with potential benefits for treatment adherence and consequently treatment efficacy.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Breast Cancer
Keywords
Breast cancer, Patient involvement, Question prompt-sheet, Doctor-patient communication, RCT

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
300 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
prompt-sheet
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients and companions of intervention group receive a form on which to write their reply to the following request: "Please indicate the arguments which you want to discuss today with your oncologist" and the prompt sheet. An introduction explains the importance of asking questions during the consultations. The patient (companion) is invited to select among a written list of about 50 possible questions those, if any, s/he would like to ask today to the oncology.
Arm Title
control group
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Patients and companions of the control group receive a form on which to write their reply to the following request: "Please indicate the arguments which you want to discuss today with your oncologist"
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
prompt-sheet
Intervention Description
Prompt sheet is a form on which to write the reply to the following request: "Please indicate the arguments which you want to discuss today with your oncologist" and a written list of possible questions the patient (companion) would like to ask to the oncology.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
control group
Intervention Description
Patients and companions of the control group receive a form on which to write their reply to the following request: "Please indicate the arguments which you want to discuss today with your oncologist"
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
number of question during the consultation
Description
The intervention prompt-sheet aims to increase the number of question by giving the opportunity to patients and companions to reflect on their informative needs on the basis of a wide range of possible questions from which to choose those perceived as most relevant in view of the subsequent consultation. Question asking is considered an index for patient participation during the consultation. The total number of patient questions during the consultation regarding diagnosis, prognosis, treatment and other issues is the primary outcome measure.
Time Frame
1 hour after the intervention (question prompt-sheet)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The number of informative needs not met during the consultation.
Description
This measure is derived by comparing the number of questions indicated by patients and their companion before the consultation with those actually raised during the consultation
Time Frame
1 hour after the intervention (question prompt-sheet)
Title
Ability to cope with the illness
Description
the Patient Enablement Instrument (PEI) is a questionnaire of six items on a Likert scale from 0 (same or less) to 2 (much better, much more), administered after the consultation.
Time Frame
2 hours after the intervention (question prompt-sheet)
Title
Patient involvement (SDM-Q and OPTION)
Description
The SDM-Q is a self administered questionnaire of 9 items on a Likert scale from 1 to 6 and assesses patients' perception of the decisional process and their level of involvement during the consultation. The OPTION Scale is composed of 12 items of operational definitions of different patient involving skills, rated on a Likert scale from 0 to 4. The scale is applied by trained raters to the audio-recording of the consultation
Time Frame
2 hours after the intervention (question prompt-sheet)
Title
Satisfaction with decisions (SWD).
Description
Satisfaction with Decision Scale (SWD) is a questionnaireof 6 items on a Likert scale from 0 (completely disagree) to 5 (agree completely), administered after the consultation.
Time Frame
2 hours after the intervention (question prompt-sheet)
Title
Recalling and understanding of information
Description
The Recall Questionnaire consists of six questions which ask the patient's to recall the received information on treatment decisions and pathology. We added three other questions, rated on a 0 (no at al) to 5 (very much) likert scale asking whether the patient succeeded in their purpose of question asking, whether the oncologist answered the questions properly and how much more information she would have needed.
Time Frame
2 hours after the intervention (question prompt-sheet)
Title
Overall consultation atmosphere (VR-COPE, RIAS, AIMIT on the audio-recorded consultation)
Description
VRCOPE assesses the content, the process and relational aspects of patient-centred communication during medical consultations on the basis of a multidimensional evaluation and comprises nine items. RIAS is a coding system of medical consultations, composed by 40 categories describing interactions between doctors and patients. AIMIT is a coding system to assess in the therapeutic dialogue the activity of interpersonal motivational systems that guide the verbal and non verbal behaviors during interactions.
Time Frame
1 hour after the intervention (question prompt-sheet)
Title
Perceived Patient-doctor relationship (PDRQ-9 and DDPRQ-10)
Description
PDRQ-9 is a self-administered (after the consultation) questionnaire of 9 items on a Likert scale from 1 to 5, to measure the relationship between the doctor and the patient, from a patient point of view.The DDPRQ-10 is a self-report instrument of 10 items on a Likert scale from 1 to 6, completed by physicians after an encounter with a patient.
Time Frame
2 hours after the intervention (question prompt-sheet)
Title
Perceived role preference of the patient (CPS)
Description
CPS (Oncologist version) assesses how the oncologist perceives the role that patient might prefer regarding the decision making process.
Time Frame
2 hours after the intervention (question prompt-sheet)

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: all consecutive patients age between 18 and 75 years attending the Oncology Out-patient Clinics of the participating centres recent diagnosis of breast cancer at an early stage Exclusion Criteria: presence of metastasis or relapse severe mental deterioration comprehension difficulties of the Italian language.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Claudia Goss
Organizational Affiliation
Universita di Verona
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata
City
Verona
ZIP/Postal Code
37134
Country
Italy

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
33089767
Citation
Buizza C, Cela H, Ferrari C, Goss C, Bottacini A, Mazzi MA, Del Piccolo L, Ghilardi A. Does being accompanied make a difference in communication during breast cancer consultations? Results from a multi-centered randomized controlled trial. J Psychosoc Oncol. 2021;39(2):189-203. doi: 10.1080/07347332.2020.1829775. Epub 2020 Oct 22.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30852786
Citation
Buizza C, Ghilardi A, Mazzardi P, Barbera D, Fremondi V, Bottacini A, Mazzi MA, Goss C. Effects of a Question Prompt Sheet on the Oncologist-Patient Relationship: a Multi-centred Randomised Controlled Trial in Breast Cancer. J Cancer Educ. 2020 Jun;35(3):621-628. doi: 10.1007/s13187-019-01505-6.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
28801395
Citation
Bottacini A, Goss C, Mazzi MA, Ghilardi A, Buizza C, Molino A, Fiorio E, Nortilli R, Amoroso V, Vassalli L, Brown RF. The involvement of early stage breast cancer patients during oncology consultations in Italy: a multi-centred, randomized controlled trial of a question prompt sheet versus question listing. BMJ Open. 2017 Aug 11;7(8):e015079. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2016-015079.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
23645911
Citation
Goss C, Ghilardi A, Deledda G, Buizza C, Bottacini A, Del Piccolo L, Rimondini M, Chiodera F, Mazzi MA, Ballarin M, Bighelli I, Strepparava MG, Molino A, Fiorio E, Nortilli R, Caliolo C, Zuliani S, Auriemma A, Maspero F, Simoncini EL, Ragni F, Brown R, Zimmermann C. INvolvement of breast CAncer patients during oncological consultations: a multicentre randomised controlled trial--the INCA study protocol. BMJ Open. 2013 May 2;3(5):e002266. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-002266.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

The Involvement of Breast Cancer Patients During Oncological Consultations

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs