Effectiveness of 3,4-Diaminopyridine in Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome (DAPPER)
Primary Purpose
Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome, Eaton-Lambert Myasthenic Syndrome
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Continuous 3,4-DAP
Taper 3,4-DAP to Placebo
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome focused on measuring Lambert-Eaton, Eaton-Lambert, myasthenia, myasthenic, LEMS, LES, DAP, diaminopyridine, 3,4-diaminopyridine, 3,4-DAP
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age 18 or over
- Ambulatory while taking 3,4-DAP, i.e. the patient was able to perform the timed up and go (TUG), either with or without an assistive device
- Established diagnosis of LEMS, with documentation provided
- Continuous use of Jacobus 3,4-DAP for at least 3 months
- Minimum of 3 doses per day with no single dose less than 10 mg of 3,4-DAP
- The patient needed to wait about 15 to 30 minutes to experience an unequivocal improvement in a LEMS-induced dysfunction after they take their first dose of 3,4-DAP in the morning [a patient who remains in bed past this point by choice may still be eligible]
- Stable regimen of all LEMS-related treatments for at least 3 months
- Stable daily regimen of other medications (prescription and over-the-counter) for a minimum of 1 month
- Willing to chance being tapered off of 3,4-DAP
- Fluency in English
- If applicable, agreed to use birth control during heterosexual intercourse until at least 2 weeks after completion of study
- A signed informed consent by the study subject
Exclusion Criteria:
- Last monoclonal antibody treatment (e.g. rituximab) was less than 6 months ago (i.e., recent treatment is an exclusion)
- Clinically significant or poorly controlled condition that in the opinion of the study personnel might pose an unacceptable risk to the patient if entered into the study
- Respiratory failure requiring intubation while on 3,4-DAP with no precipitating event or medication
- Use of any investigational drug other than 3,4-DAP within the last 30 days
- Pregnant or lactating
- Current use of other aminopyridines (e.g.4-AP) or guanidine
- Did not display a sufficiently large response to 3,4-DAP during the baseline observation period in the CRU to detect a decline during withdrawal of 3,4-DAP
Sites / Locations
- University of California at Davis
- Indiana University
- Duke University
- Oregon Health & Science University
- Vanderbilt University Medical Center
- Baylor College of Medicine
- University of Utah
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
Continuous 3,4-DAP
Taper 3,4-DAP to Placebo
Arm Description
Subjects continued taking their usual individualized regimen of 3,4-DAP base, 30 to 100 mg daily divided into at least 3 doses.
Subjects were tapered over 3 days from their usual individualized regimen of 3,4-DAP base (30 to 100 mg daily divided into at least 3 doses) to placebo with up to an additional 16 hours of placebo before resuming their usual pre-study regimen of 3,4-DAP base
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Number of Participants With 30% or More Deterioration in Triple Timed Up & Go (3TUG) Test, Compared to Time-matched Baseline
The 3TUG time obtained 2 hours after the last dose of the withdrawal period (i.e., at time of theoretical "peak drug effect") was compared to the average time-matched 3TUG tests performed during 2 days of baseline observation prior to randomization.
The study endpoint was a change of more than 30% in the final post-dose 3TUG during the withdrawal period and was based on blinded readings of video recordings of 3TUG tests.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Self-assessment of LEMS-related Weakness, W-SAS
The last post-dose self-assessment of LEMS-related weakness from the withdrawal period with categories of much much weaker (-3), much weaker (-2), somewhat weaker (-1), about the same (0), somewhat stronger (1), much stronger (2), and much much stronger (3).
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01511978
Brief Title
Effectiveness of 3,4-Diaminopyridine in Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome
Acronym
DAPPER
Official Title
Inpatient Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Withdrawal Study of 3,4-Diaminopyridine Base (3,4-DAP) in Subjects With Known Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
July 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2012 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
February 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2015 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Jacobus Pharmaceutical
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Hypothesis: 3,4-Diaminopyridine base (3,4-DAP) improves Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome (LEMS)-related weakness.
Detailed Description
The objectives of the study were to confirm the safety and to test the efficacy of 3,4-DAP in the treatment of LEMS-related weakness.
This was a phase 2 randomized double-blind placebo-controlled withdrawal study in subjects with known clinically active LEMS who had been on a chronic stable dose of compassionate distribution Jacobus 3,4-DAP provided through FDA-approved individual investigator-held INDs.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome, Eaton-Lambert Myasthenic Syndrome
Keywords
Lambert-Eaton, Eaton-Lambert, myasthenia, myasthenic, LEMS, LES, DAP, diaminopyridine, 3,4-diaminopyridine, 3,4-DAP
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
This was a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled withdrawal study to assess the safety and efficacy of 3,4-DAP in subjects on a stable regimen of all LEMS-related treatments, including 3,4-DAP, for a minimum of 3 months prior to study entry. Subjects who met all study entry criteria were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to continue their current treatment regimen (Group A, continuous 3,4-DAP) or tapered withdrawal from 3,4-DAP (Group B, taper to placebo).
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
32 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Continuous 3,4-DAP
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects continued taking their usual individualized regimen of 3,4-DAP base, 30 to 100 mg daily divided into at least 3 doses.
Arm Title
Taper 3,4-DAP to Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects were tapered over 3 days from their usual individualized regimen of 3,4-DAP base (30 to 100 mg daily divided into at least 3 doses) to placebo with up to an additional 16 hours of placebo before resuming their usual pre-study regimen of 3,4-DAP base
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Continuous 3,4-DAP
Other Intervention Name(s)
3,4-Diaminopyridine, 3,4-Pyridinediamine, Diamino-3,4-pyridine
Intervention Description
Subjects were maintained on their usual personal dose and schedule of 3,4-DAP base
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Taper 3,4-DAP to Placebo
Other Intervention Name(s)
3,4-Diaminopyridine, 3,4-Pyridinediamine, Diamino-3,4-pyridine, Placebo
Intervention Description
Subjects were tapered over 3 days from their usual regimen of 3,4-DAP base to placebo with up to an additional 16 hours of placebo before resuming their usual pre-study regimen of 3,4-DAP base
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With 30% or More Deterioration in Triple Timed Up & Go (3TUG) Test, Compared to Time-matched Baseline
Description
The 3TUG time obtained 2 hours after the last dose of the withdrawal period (i.e., at time of theoretical "peak drug effect") was compared to the average time-matched 3TUG tests performed during 2 days of baseline observation prior to randomization.
The study endpoint was a change of more than 30% in the final post-dose 3TUG during the withdrawal period and was based on blinded readings of video recordings of 3TUG tests.
Time Frame
Baseline period (days 0, 1, 2); Randomized treatment period (starting with last dose of day 2, and days 3, 4, 5, and ending with first dose on day 6 when pre-randomization regimen was resumed, or rescue, if indicated sooner)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Self-assessment of LEMS-related Weakness, W-SAS
Description
The last post-dose self-assessment of LEMS-related weakness from the withdrawal period with categories of much much weaker (-3), much weaker (-2), somewhat weaker (-1), about the same (0), somewhat stronger (1), much stronger (2), and much much stronger (3).
Time Frame
Participants were followed for up to 7 days
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Age 18 or over
Ambulatory while taking 3,4-DAP, i.e. the patient was able to perform the timed up and go (TUG), either with or without an assistive device
Established diagnosis of LEMS, with documentation provided
Continuous use of Jacobus 3,4-DAP for at least 3 months
Minimum of 3 doses per day with no single dose less than 10 mg of 3,4-DAP
The patient needed to wait about 15 to 30 minutes to experience an unequivocal improvement in a LEMS-induced dysfunction after they take their first dose of 3,4-DAP in the morning [a patient who remains in bed past this point by choice may still be eligible]
Stable regimen of all LEMS-related treatments for at least 3 months
Stable daily regimen of other medications (prescription and over-the-counter) for a minimum of 1 month
Willing to chance being tapered off of 3,4-DAP
Fluency in English
If applicable, agreed to use birth control during heterosexual intercourse until at least 2 weeks after completion of study
A signed informed consent by the study subject
Exclusion Criteria:
Last monoclonal antibody treatment (e.g. rituximab) was less than 6 months ago (i.e., recent treatment is an exclusion)
Clinically significant or poorly controlled condition that in the opinion of the study personnel might pose an unacceptable risk to the patient if entered into the study
Respiratory failure requiring intubation while on 3,4-DAP with no precipitating event or medication
Use of any investigational drug other than 3,4-DAP within the last 30 days
Pregnant or lactating
Current use of other aminopyridines (e.g.4-AP) or guanidine
Did not display a sufficiently large response to 3,4-DAP during the baseline observation period in the CRU to detect a decline during withdrawal of 3,4-DAP
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kathy L Aleš, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Jacobus Pharmaceutical
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of California at Davis
City
Sacramento
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95817
Country
United States
Facility Name
Indiana University
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46202
Country
United States
Facility Name
Duke University
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27710
Country
United States
Facility Name
Oregon Health & Science University
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97239
Country
United States
Facility Name
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37232
Country
United States
Facility Name
Baylor College of Medicine
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Utah
City
Salt Lake City
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84132
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Learn more about this trial
Effectiveness of 3,4-Diaminopyridine in Lambert-Eaton Myasthenic Syndrome
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs