Randomized Controlled Trial of Long-term Treatment Effectiveness for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD) and Dry Eye
Primary Purpose
Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, Dry Eye
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
LipiFlow System
Warm Compress Therapy + Lid Scrub
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- At least 18 years old
- Tear film assessment that qualifies in both eyes
- Evidence of meibomian gland dysfunction and dry eye in both eyes
- Willingness to comply with study protocol
Exclusion Criteria:
- Systemic disease condition or medication that causes dry eye
- Use of other treatments for MGD or dry eye
- Ocular surgery, trauma, herpes infection, punctal plug insertion or punctal occlusion within past 3 months
- Active eye infection
- Active eye inflammation or recurrent inflammation within past 3 months
- Moderate to severe allergic conjunctivitis
- Severe eyelid inflammation
- Eyelid abnormality that affects lid function
- Ocular surface abnormality that may compromise corneal integrity
- Pregnant or nursing women
- Participation in another ophthalmic clinical trial within past 30 days
Sites / Locations
- McDonald Eye Associates
- Harvard Eye Associates
- Center for Excellence in Eye Care
- Chicago Cornea Consultants, Ltd.
- Jackson Eye
- Cincinnati Eye Institute - Northern Kentucky
- Charles River Eye Associates
- Associated Eye Care
- Ophthalmology Consultants, Ltd.
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
LipiFlow System
Warm Compress and Lid Hygiene
Arm Description
Treatment with LipiFlow System at randomization in Stage 1 of study
Control group receiving warm compress therapy and lid hygiene at randomization in Stage 1 of study and crossover LipiFlow System treatment in Stage 2 of study
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Stage 1 Mean Change in Total Meibomian Gland Score From Baseline to 3 Months
To assess the meibomian glands, the secretion characteristics from 15 gland orifices along the lower eyelid were evaluated under a slit lamp biomicrosope using a handheld instrument, Meibomian Gland Evaluator, to apply gentle standardized pressure to the eyelid margin. Expressed secretion characteristics were graded on a scale of 3 (clear liquid secretion), 2 (cloudy liquid secretion), 1 (inspissated/toothpaste consistency), and 0 (no secretion). Total meibomian gland score was calculated based on the sum of the secretion grades for all 15 glands over a range from 0 to 45 with a higher score reflecting less meibomian gland dysfunction. To be eligible for the study, the Baseline total meibomian gland score must have been 12 or less in each eye. Change = 3 Month score - Baseline Score.
Stage 2 Mean Total Meibomian Gland Score at 12 Months
To assess the meibomian glands, the secretion characteristics from 15 gland orifices along the lower eyelid were evaluated under a slit lamp biomicrosope using a handheld instrument, Meibomian Gland Evaluator, to apply gentle standardized pressure to the eyelid margin. Expressed secretion characteristics were graded on a scale of 3 (clear liquid secretion), 2 (cloudy liquid secretion), 1 (inspissated/toothpaste consistency), and 0 (no secretion). Total meibomian gland score was calculated based on the sum of the secretion grades for all 15 glands over a range from 0 to 45 with a higher score reflecting less meibomian gland dysfunction. The total meibomian gland score at 12 Months was compared across subgroups, as defined below.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Stage 1 Mean Change in Total OSDI Score From Baseline to 3 Months
Dry eye symptoms assessed using the OSDI questionnaire were sensitivity to light, grittiness, pain or soreness, blurred vision and poor vision. The questionnaire evaluated the frequency problems with the eyes limited performance in reading, driving at night, working with a computer or bank machine, and watching television. Also, the frequency that eyes felt uncomfortable was assessed in windy conditions, areas with low humidity, and air-conditioned areas. The frequency scale was 0 (none of the time), 1 (some of the time), 2 (half of the time), 3 (most of the time), and 4 (all of the time). The total OSDI score was calculated as the sum of frequency scores for all symptoms multiplied by 25 and divided by the number of questions answered with a range from 0 to 100. A lower total OSDI score represents less disability from dry eye symptoms. To be eligible for the study, the Baseline total OSDI score must have been 13 points or higher in each eye. Change=3 Months score-Baseline score.
Stage 2 Mean Total OSDI Score at 12 Months
Dry eye symptoms assessed using the OSDI questionnaire were sensitivity to light, grittiness, pain or soreness, blurred vision and poor vision. The questionnaire evaluated the frequency problems with the eyes limited performance in reading, driving at night, working with a computer or bank machine, and watching television. Also, the frequency that eyes felt uncomfortable was assessed in windy conditions, areas with low humidity, and air-conditioned areas. Frequency scale was 0 (none of the time), 1 (some of the time), 2 (half of the time), 3 (most of the time), and 4 (all of the time). The total OSDI score was calculated as the sum of frequency scores for all symptoms multiplied by 25 and divided by the number of questions answered with a range from 0 to 100. A lower total OSDI score represents less disability from dry eye symptoms. The total OSDI score at 12 Months was compared across subgroups, as defined below.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01521507
Brief Title
Randomized Controlled Trial of Long-term Treatment Effectiveness for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD) and Dry Eye
Official Title
Randomized Controlled Trial of Long-term Treatment Effectiveness for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD) and Dry Eye
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
February 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 2012 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
November 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 2014 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
TearScience, Inc.
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The study objective is to evaluate the long-term treatment effectiveness for adult patients with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) and evaporative dry eye by: 1) comparing the LipiFlow® System to a standardized daily warm compress and eyelid hygiene control therapy over a duration of 3 Months; and 2) evaluating the LipiFlow® alone and in combination with other MGD and dry eye treatments over a duration of up to 12 Months.
This is a post-market, non-significant risk, prospective and multi-center clinical trial divided into two stages. The first stage from enrollment to 3 Months is an open-label, randomized controlled design to compare the effectiveness of a single LipiFlow® System treatment to a standardized daily warm compress and eyelid hygiene Control therapy with Crossover LipiFlow® treatment of the Control subjects at 3 Months. The second stage, occurring between 3 and 12 Months, is an observational design to evaluate the effectiveness of LipiFlow® alone and in combination with other MGD and dry eye treatments over a duration of up to 12 Months. Subjects are entered into the following subgroups based on the subject's self-assessment of the adequacy of symptom relief and protocol-defined criteria for additional treatment.
One LipiFlow® Treatment: Subjects who receive only one LipiFlow® treatment.
Two LipiFlow® Treatments: Subjects who receive a second LipiFlow® treatment.
Combination Treatment: Subjects who receive one or two LipiFlow® treatments followed by other MGD or dry eye treatment, as prescribed by the physician.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Meibomian Gland Dysfunction, Dry Eye
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
200 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
LipiFlow System
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Treatment with LipiFlow System at randomization in Stage 1 of study
Arm Title
Warm Compress and Lid Hygiene
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Control group receiving warm compress therapy and lid hygiene at randomization in Stage 1 of study and crossover LipiFlow System treatment in Stage 2 of study
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
LipiFlow System
Intervention Description
In-office device treatment for meibomian gland dysfunction by a physician
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Warm Compress Therapy + Lid Scrub
Other Intervention Name(s)
EyeGiene Warm Compress Therapy, OCuSOFT Lid Scrub
Intervention Description
At-home daily warm compress therapy and lid hygiene
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Stage 1 Mean Change in Total Meibomian Gland Score From Baseline to 3 Months
Description
To assess the meibomian glands, the secretion characteristics from 15 gland orifices along the lower eyelid were evaluated under a slit lamp biomicrosope using a handheld instrument, Meibomian Gland Evaluator, to apply gentle standardized pressure to the eyelid margin. Expressed secretion characteristics were graded on a scale of 3 (clear liquid secretion), 2 (cloudy liquid secretion), 1 (inspissated/toothpaste consistency), and 0 (no secretion). Total meibomian gland score was calculated based on the sum of the secretion grades for all 15 glands over a range from 0 to 45 with a higher score reflecting less meibomian gland dysfunction. To be eligible for the study, the Baseline total meibomian gland score must have been 12 or less in each eye. Change = 3 Month score - Baseline Score.
Time Frame
Baseline and 3 Months
Title
Stage 2 Mean Total Meibomian Gland Score at 12 Months
Description
To assess the meibomian glands, the secretion characteristics from 15 gland orifices along the lower eyelid were evaluated under a slit lamp biomicrosope using a handheld instrument, Meibomian Gland Evaluator, to apply gentle standardized pressure to the eyelid margin. Expressed secretion characteristics were graded on a scale of 3 (clear liquid secretion), 2 (cloudy liquid secretion), 1 (inspissated/toothpaste consistency), and 0 (no secretion). Total meibomian gland score was calculated based on the sum of the secretion grades for all 15 glands over a range from 0 to 45 with a higher score reflecting less meibomian gland dysfunction. The total meibomian gland score at 12 Months was compared across subgroups, as defined below.
Time Frame
12 Months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Stage 1 Mean Change in Total OSDI Score From Baseline to 3 Months
Description
Dry eye symptoms assessed using the OSDI questionnaire were sensitivity to light, grittiness, pain or soreness, blurred vision and poor vision. The questionnaire evaluated the frequency problems with the eyes limited performance in reading, driving at night, working with a computer or bank machine, and watching television. Also, the frequency that eyes felt uncomfortable was assessed in windy conditions, areas with low humidity, and air-conditioned areas. The frequency scale was 0 (none of the time), 1 (some of the time), 2 (half of the time), 3 (most of the time), and 4 (all of the time). The total OSDI score was calculated as the sum of frequency scores for all symptoms multiplied by 25 and divided by the number of questions answered with a range from 0 to 100. A lower total OSDI score represents less disability from dry eye symptoms. To be eligible for the study, the Baseline total OSDI score must have been 13 points or higher in each eye. Change=3 Months score-Baseline score.
Time Frame
Baseline, 3 Months
Title
Stage 2 Mean Total OSDI Score at 12 Months
Description
Dry eye symptoms assessed using the OSDI questionnaire were sensitivity to light, grittiness, pain or soreness, blurred vision and poor vision. The questionnaire evaluated the frequency problems with the eyes limited performance in reading, driving at night, working with a computer or bank machine, and watching television. Also, the frequency that eyes felt uncomfortable was assessed in windy conditions, areas with low humidity, and air-conditioned areas. Frequency scale was 0 (none of the time), 1 (some of the time), 2 (half of the time), 3 (most of the time), and 4 (all of the time). The total OSDI score was calculated as the sum of frequency scores for all symptoms multiplied by 25 and divided by the number of questions answered with a range from 0 to 100. A lower total OSDI score represents less disability from dry eye symptoms. The total OSDI score at 12 Months was compared across subgroups, as defined below.
Time Frame
12 Months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
At least 18 years old
Tear film assessment that qualifies in both eyes
Evidence of meibomian gland dysfunction and dry eye in both eyes
Willingness to comply with study protocol
Exclusion Criteria:
Systemic disease condition or medication that causes dry eye
Use of other treatments for MGD or dry eye
Ocular surgery, trauma, herpes infection, punctal plug insertion or punctal occlusion within past 3 months
Active eye infection
Active eye inflammation or recurrent inflammation within past 3 months
Moderate to severe allergic conjunctivitis
Severe eyelid inflammation
Eyelid abnormality that affects lid function
Ocular surface abnormality that may compromise corneal integrity
Pregnant or nursing women
Participation in another ophthalmic clinical trial within past 30 days
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christy Stevens, O.D.
Organizational Affiliation
TearScience, Inc.
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
McDonald Eye Associates
City
Fayetteville
State/Province
Arkansas
ZIP/Postal Code
72703
Country
United States
Facility Name
Harvard Eye Associates
City
Laguna Hills
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92653
Country
United States
Facility Name
Center for Excellence in Eye Care
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33176
Country
United States
Facility Name
Chicago Cornea Consultants, Ltd.
City
Hoffman Estates
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60169
Country
United States
Facility Name
Jackson Eye
City
Lake Villa
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
50046
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cincinnati Eye Institute - Northern Kentucky
City
Edgewood
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
41017
Country
United States
Facility Name
Charles River Eye Associates
City
Winchester
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
01890
Country
United States
Facility Name
Associated Eye Care
City
Stillwater
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55082
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ophthalmology Consultants, Ltd.
City
St. Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63131
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Randomized Controlled Trial of Long-term Treatment Effectiveness for Meibomian Gland Dysfunction (MGD) and Dry Eye
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs