search
Back to results

A Study Comparing the Combination of the Best Supportive Care Plus E7080 Versus Best Supportive Care Alone, in Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer or Lung Cancer That Has Spread, Who Have Been Previously Treated, Unsuccessfully, With at Least 2 Different Treatments

Primary Purpose

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Lenvatinib
Lenvatinib matched placebo
BSC
Sponsored by
Eisai Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer focused on measuring Locally Advanced, Metastatic Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria

  1. Age greater than or equal to 18 years;
  2. Participants with histologically or cytologically confirmed non-squamous NSCLC with locally advanced or metastatic disease based on Tumor, Node, Metastasis (TNM) staging according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual, Seventh Edition, who had failed at least two lines of systemic anticancer therapy for advanced or metastatic NSCLC (did not include adjuvant chemotherapy). In countries where erlotinib was approved and marketed for the treatment of NSCLC, participants must have received erlotinib treatment (or gefitinib for participants outside of the US) for their NSCLC if they had known EGFR-activating mutations. Participants of unknown EGFR status who had not received prior erlotinib (or gefitinib) should have been tested for EGFR-activating mutations prior to study entry. In countries where crizotinib was approved and marketed, participants must have received crizotinib treatment for NSCLC that was ALK-positive. Participants with ALK positive NCSLC or participants with KRAS mutations were not required to have prior treatment with erlotinib or gefitinib
  3. Participants must have at least 1 site of measurable disease by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v.1.1);
  4. ECOG PS of 0 to 2;
  5. Participants must have adequate renal function as evidenced by serum creatinine less than or equal to 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) or calculated creatinine clearance greater than or equal to 30 mL/min per the Cockcroft and Gault formula;
  6. Blood pressure must be well-controlled (less than or equal to140/90 mm Hg at Screening) with or without antihypertensive medication. Participants must have no history of hypertensive crisis or hypertensive encephalopathy;
  7. Participants must have adequate bone marrow function as evidenced by absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than or equal to 1.5 x 109/L, hemoglobin greater than or equal to 9.0 g/dL, and platelet count greater than or equal to 100 x 109/L;
  8. Participants must have adequate liver function as evidenced by bilirubin less than or equal to 1.5 times the ULN, and alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) less than or equal to 3 x ULN (in the case of liver metastases, less than or equal to 5 x ULN).
  9. Participants must have adequate coagulation system function as defined by prothrombin time/International normalized ratio (INR) less than or equal to 1.5 x ULN.
  10. Male or female participants of child-producing potential must agree to use double barrier contraception, oral contraceptives, or avoidance of pregnancy measures during the study and for 90 days after the last day of treatment;
  11. Females of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test;
  12. Females may not be breastfeeding;
  13. Ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria

  1. Prior therapy with E7080 or other small molecule vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors;
  2. Presence of brain metastases, unless the participant has received adequate treatment at least 4 weeks prior to randomization, and is stable, asymptomatic, and off steroids for at least 4 weeks prior to randomization;
  3. Meningeal carcinomatosis;
  4. Received chemotherapy, targeted therapy, radiotherapy, surgery, or immunotherapy within the 21 days prior to commencing study treatment or have not recovered from all treatment-related toxicities to Grade less than or equal to 2, except for alopecia;
  5. Received treatment with another investigational agent within the 30 days prior to commencing study treatment or participants who have not recovered from side effects of an investigational drug to Grade less than or equal to 2, except for alopecia;
  6. Participants with proteinuria greater than 1+ on urine dipstick testing will undergo 24-hour urine collection for quantitative assessment of proteinuria. Participants with 24-hour urine protein greater than or equal to 1 g/24 hours will be ineligible;
  7. Serious non-healing wound, ulcer, bone fracture, or have undergone a major surgical procedure, open biopsy, or significant traumatic injury within the 28 days prior to commencing study treatment.
  8. Major surgery scheduled during the projected course of the study;
  9. History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy;
  10. Active hemoptysis (defined as bright red blood of a half teaspoon or more) within the 30 days prior to study entry;
  11. Refractory nausea and vomiting, malabsorption, significant bowel resection, or any other medical condition that would preclude adequate absorption or result in the inability to take oral medication;
  12. Other malignancy within 3 years of randomization, with the exception of adequately treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix or non-melanoma skin cancer, with no subsequent evidence of recurrence and/or malignancies diagnosed at a stage where definitive therapy results in near certain cures.
  13. Significant cardiovascular impairment (history of congestive heart failure New York Heart Association [NYHA] Class greater than II, unstable angina or myocardial infarction within the past 6 months, or serious cardiac arrhythmia);
  14. Any history of cerebral vascular accident (CVA), transient ischemic attack (TIA), or Grade greater than or equal to 2 peripheral vascular disease unless they have had no evidence of active disease for at least 6 months prior to randomization;
  15. History of abdominal fistula, gastrointestinal perforation, or intra-abdominal abscess within the 6 months prior to enrollment;
  16. Participants with organ allografts requiring immunosuppression;
  17. Known positive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), known hepatitis B surface antigen, or hepatitis C positive;
  18. Hypersensitivity to E7080 or any of the excipients;
  19. Any history of or concomitant medical condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would compromise the participant's ability to safely complete the study.

Sites / Locations

  • Donald W. Hill, M.D., F.A.C.P.
  • Arizona Oncology Associates , PC - HOPE
  • Ronald Yanagihara, MD 9360 North Name Uno Suite 130 Gilroy California 95020
  • Ocala Oncology Center, P.L.
  • Washington University 660 South Euclid Avenue Campus Box 8124 St Louis Missouri 63110
  • New York Oncology Heamatology - Latham
  • Montefiore Medical Park 1695 Easchester Road Floor 1 Bronx, NY 10461
  • Cancer Treatment and Research Centre Bismarck North Dakota 58501
  • Texas Oncology, P.A. - Paris
  • Texas Oncology, P.A. - Plano
  • Texas Oncology, P.A. - Waco
  • OLV Ziekenhuis
  • Grand Hopital de Charleroi
  • AZ Sint-Maarten
  • UZ Antwerpen
  • UZ Leuven
  • C. H. R. de la Citadelle
  • Domaine Universitaire du Sart-Tilman
  • Institut onkologie a rehabilitace Na Plesi
  • Avicennus, s.r.o.
  • Fakultni nemocnice Na Bulovce
  • Oblastni nemocnice Pribram, a.s.
  • Semmelweis Egyetem AOK
  • Orszagos Koranyi TBC es Pulmonologiai Intezet
  • Matrai Gyogyintezet
  • Fejer Megyei Szent Gyorgy Korhaz
  • Komarom-Esztergom Megyei Onkorm. Szent Borbala Korhaza
  • Tudogyogyintezet Torokbalint
  • Zala Megyei Korhaz
  • Azienda Ospedaliera G. Rummo
  • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Martino
  • Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo
  • Istituto Clinico Humanitas
  • Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Parma
  • Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri IRCCS
  • Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia Ospedale S. Maria della Misericordia
  • Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini
  • Ospedale Mater Salutis
  • Chungbuk National University Hospital
  • Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital
  • Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
  • Korea University Guro Hospital
  • Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
  • The Catholic University of Korea Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital
  • Ulsan University Hospital
  • The Christie NHS Foundation Trust
  • Southampton General Hospital
  • North Staffs Royal Infirmary
  • Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre
  • New Cross Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Lenvatinib

Lenvatinib matched placebo

Arm Description

Participants received lenvatinib 24 mg orally, once daily continuously in each 28-day treatment cycle plus Best Supportive Care (BSC)

Participants received lenvatinib matched placebo orally, once daily continuously in each 28-day treatment cycle plus BSC

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Non-serious Adverse Events (AEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered with an investigational product. A SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose; resulted in death, was life-threatening (i.e., the subject was at a risk of death at the time of the event; this did not include an event that hypothetically might have caused death if it had been more severe), required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, or was a congenital abnormality/birth defect. In this study, treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (defined as an AE (serious/non-serious) that started/increased in severity on/after the first dose of study medication up to 30 days after the final dose of study medication) were assessed.
6-Month Survival Rate
Event-free survival rate was calculated using Kaplan Meier estimations. The percentage of participants with event free survival up to 6 months and the corresponding 95% confidence interval were estimated for each treatment group. The data presented is based on the data cut-off date of 26 November 2013 while the study is still ongoing.
1-year Survival Rate
Event-free survival rate was calculated using Kaplan Meier estimations. The percentage of participants with event free survival up to 1 year and the corresponding 95% confidence interval were estimated for each treatment group. The data presented is based on the data cut-off date of 26 November 2013 while the study is still ongoing.
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the time from the date of the randomization until the date of first documented disease progression according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 or date of death from any cause (whichever occurred first), assessed based on investigator's assessment. Disease progression per RECIST v1.1 was defined as at least a 20% relative increase and 5 mm absolute increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study), recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. The data presented is based on the data cut-off date of 21 January 2014 while the study is still ongoing.
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
ORR, defined as the percentage of participants who had best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as determined by investigator using RECIST 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) had to have reduction in short axis to less than 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. ORR = CR + PR. The data presented is based on the data cut-off date of 21 January 2014 while the study is still ongoing.
Response Duration (RD)
Response duration, defined as the time from the date of the first assessment demonstrating a CR or PR to the date of the first assessment demonstrating progressive disease or death, whichever occurred first. This is an investigator assessed outcome, measured using RECIST 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) had to have reduction in short axis to less than 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Response duration was summarized by including only subjects with events. The data presented is based on the data cut-off date of 21 January 2014 while the study is still ongoing.
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
The percentage of participants with CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) for greater than or equal to 12 weeks. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) had to have reduction in short axis to less than 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Stable disease was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on the study. The data presented is based on the data cut-off date of 21 January 2014 while the study is still ongoing.
The Percentage of Participants With The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Symptom Scores Achieving Clinically Significant Deterioration on Quality of Life (QOL)
The EORTC QLQ-C30 symptom score, a cancer specific self-reporting questionnaire was composed of 9-symptom scales assessing fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties. All of the multi-item scales and single-item measures ranged in score from 0 to 100. For each domain and item, a linear transformation was applied to standardize the raw score to a range from 0 to 100, with a higher scale score representing a higher response level/ high level of symptomatology / problems. The data is presented as percentage of participants with EORTC QLQ-C30 symptom score achieving clinically significant deterioration on QOL. Participants were considered as deteriorated for a given symptom if the change in score from Baseline was 10 points or higher at any time point after Baseline. The data presented is based on the data cut-off date of 21 January 2014 while the study is still ongoing.
The Percentage of Participants With The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Module QLQ-LC13 (Lung Cancer 13) Symptom Scores Achieving Clinically Significant Deterioration on QOL
The EORTC module QLQ-LC13 symptom score was a self-reporting cancer-specific questionnaire composed of 13 questions incorporated into 1 multi-item scale designed to evaluate dyspnea and a series of single items assessing different types of pain, as well as, cough, hemoptysis, dysphagia, sore mouth, alopecia, and peripheral neuropathy. For each domain and item, a linear transformation was applied to standardize the raw score to a range from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the best possible function/QOL, and highest burden of symptoms for symptom domains and single items. The data is presented as percentage of participants with EORTC module QLQ-C13 symptom score achieving clinically significant deterioration on QOL. Participants were considered as deteriorated for a given symptom if the change in score from Baseline was 10 points or higher at any time point after Baseline. The data presented is based on the data cut-off date of 21 January 2014 while the study is still ongoing.
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Profile of Lenvatinib in Subjects With Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Blood samples were collected for lenvatinib PK analysis. Lenvatinib concentrations from sparse PK sampling were measured. The data is presented as mean nanograms per milliliter +/- Standard deviation of lenvatinib serum concentration.

Full Information

First Posted
January 6, 2012
Last Updated
August 28, 2017
Sponsor
Eisai Inc.
Collaborators
Quintiles, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01529112
Brief Title
A Study Comparing the Combination of the Best Supportive Care Plus E7080 Versus Best Supportive Care Alone, in Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer or Lung Cancer That Has Spread, Who Have Been Previously Treated, Unsuccessfully, With at Least 2 Different Treatments
Official Title
A Phase II, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study of Oral E7080 in Addition to Best Supportive Care (BSC) Versus BSC Alone in Patients With Locally Advanced or Metastatic Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Who Have Failed at Least Two Systemic Anticancer Regimens
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 2011 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 21, 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 27, 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Eisai Inc.
Collaborators
Quintiles, Inc.

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the overall survival of patients receiving E7080 + Best Supportive Care (BSC) with those receiving placebo + Best Supportive Care.
Detailed Description
This double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter, randomized Phase II study will consist of a 2-arm design, comparing E7080 + BSC (Arm 1) with placebo + BSC (Arm 2). Participants will be randomized in the ratio of 2:1 to receive either E7080 or placebo in a blinded manner.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer
Keywords
Locally Advanced, Metastatic Non-Squamous Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
135 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Lenvatinib
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants received lenvatinib 24 mg orally, once daily continuously in each 28-day treatment cycle plus Best Supportive Care (BSC)
Arm Title
Lenvatinib matched placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Participants received lenvatinib matched placebo orally, once daily continuously in each 28-day treatment cycle plus BSC
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Lenvatinib
Other Intervention Name(s)
E7080
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Lenvatinib matched placebo
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
BSC
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall Survival (OS)
Description
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause.
Time Frame
From date of randomization (Day 1) until occurrence of 90 deaths in the study (cut off date 26 November 2013), approximately 22 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Non-serious Adverse Events (AEs) and Treatment Emergent Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
Description
An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered with an investigational product. A SAE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that at any dose; resulted in death, was life-threatening (i.e., the subject was at a risk of death at the time of the event; this did not include an event that hypothetically might have caused death if it had been more severe), required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, resulted in persistent or significant disability/incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions, or was a congenital abnormality/birth defect. In this study, treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) (defined as an AE (serious/non-serious) that started/increased in severity on/after the first dose of study medication up to 30 days after the final dose of study medication) were assessed.
Time Frame
For each participant, from the first dose till 30 days after the last dose or up to approximately 2 years (data cut-off date of 21 January 2014)
Title
6-Month Survival Rate
Description
Event-free survival rate was calculated using Kaplan Meier estimations. The percentage of participants with event free survival up to 6 months and the corresponding 95% confidence interval were estimated for each treatment group. The data presented is based on the data cut-off date of 26 November 2013 while the study is still ongoing.
Time Frame
From date of randomization (Day 1) up to 6 months
Title
1-year Survival Rate
Description
Event-free survival rate was calculated using Kaplan Meier estimations. The percentage of participants with event free survival up to 1 year and the corresponding 95% confidence interval were estimated for each treatment group. The data presented is based on the data cut-off date of 26 November 2013 while the study is still ongoing.
Time Frame
From date of randomization (Day 1) up to 1 year
Title
Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Description
PFS was defined as the time from the date of the randomization until the date of first documented disease progression according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 or date of death from any cause (whichever occurred first), assessed based on investigator's assessment. Disease progression per RECIST v1.1 was defined as at least a 20% relative increase and 5 mm absolute increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions (taking as reference the smallest sum on study), recorded since the treatment started or the appearance of 1 or more new lesions. The data presented is based on the data cut-off date of 21 January 2014 while the study is still ongoing.
Time Frame
From date of randomization (Day 1) until date of first documentation of disease progression or death from any cause (whichever occurred first) or up to approximately 2 years (data cut-off date of 21 January 2014)
Title
Overall Response Rate (ORR)
Description
ORR, defined as the percentage of participants who had best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as determined by investigator using RECIST 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) had to have reduction in short axis to less than 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. ORR = CR + PR. The data presented is based on the data cut-off date of 21 January 2014 while the study is still ongoing.
Time Frame
From date of randomization (Day 1) until disease progression or death, development of unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, withdrawal by Investigator, or up to approximately 2 years (data cut-off date of 21 January 2014)
Title
Response Duration (RD)
Description
Response duration, defined as the time from the date of the first assessment demonstrating a CR or PR to the date of the first assessment demonstrating progressive disease or death, whichever occurred first. This is an investigator assessed outcome, measured using RECIST 1.1. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) had to have reduction in short axis to less than 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Response duration was summarized by including only subjects with events. The data presented is based on the data cut-off date of 21 January 2014 while the study is still ongoing.
Time Frame
From date of randomization (Day 1) until disease progression or death, development of unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, withdrawal by Investigator, or up to approximately 2 years (data cut-off date of 21 January 2014)
Title
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Description
The percentage of participants with CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) for greater than or equal to 12 weeks. CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) had to have reduction in short axis to less than 10 mm. PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. Stable disease was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on the study. The data presented is based on the data cut-off date of 21 January 2014 while the study is still ongoing.
Time Frame
From date of randomization (Day 1) until disease progression or death, development of unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of consent, withdrawal by Investigator, or up to approximately 2 years (data cut-off date of 21 January 2014)
Title
The Percentage of Participants With The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 Symptom Scores Achieving Clinically Significant Deterioration on Quality of Life (QOL)
Description
The EORTC QLQ-C30 symptom score, a cancer specific self-reporting questionnaire was composed of 9-symptom scales assessing fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties. All of the multi-item scales and single-item measures ranged in score from 0 to 100. For each domain and item, a linear transformation was applied to standardize the raw score to a range from 0 to 100, with a higher scale score representing a higher response level/ high level of symptomatology / problems. The data is presented as percentage of participants with EORTC QLQ-C30 symptom score achieving clinically significant deterioration on QOL. Participants were considered as deteriorated for a given symptom if the change in score from Baseline was 10 points or higher at any time point after Baseline. The data presented is based on the data cut-off date of 21 January 2014 while the study is still ongoing.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1 (prior to treatment in Cycle 1)), every 4 weeks during treatment, and 4 weeks after completing treatment or up to approximately 2 years (data cut-off date of 21 January 2014)
Title
The Percentage of Participants With The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Module QLQ-LC13 (Lung Cancer 13) Symptom Scores Achieving Clinically Significant Deterioration on QOL
Description
The EORTC module QLQ-LC13 symptom score was a self-reporting cancer-specific questionnaire composed of 13 questions incorporated into 1 multi-item scale designed to evaluate dyspnea and a series of single items assessing different types of pain, as well as, cough, hemoptysis, dysphagia, sore mouth, alopecia, and peripheral neuropathy. For each domain and item, a linear transformation was applied to standardize the raw score to a range from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the best possible function/QOL, and highest burden of symptoms for symptom domains and single items. The data is presented as percentage of participants with EORTC module QLQ-C13 symptom score achieving clinically significant deterioration on QOL. Participants were considered as deteriorated for a given symptom if the change in score from Baseline was 10 points or higher at any time point after Baseline. The data presented is based on the data cut-off date of 21 January 2014 while the study is still ongoing.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1 of Cycle 1 (prior to treatment in Cycle 1)), every 4 weeks during treatment, and 4 weeks after completing treatment or up to approximately 2 years (data cut-off date of 21 January 2014)
Title
Pharmacokinetic (PK) Profile of Lenvatinib in Subjects With Non Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC)
Description
Blood samples were collected for lenvatinib PK analysis. Lenvatinib concentrations from sparse PK sampling were measured. The data is presented as mean nanograms per milliliter +/- Standard deviation of lenvatinib serum concentration.
Time Frame
Cycle 1/Day 1 (between 0.5 and 4 hours postdose and 6 and 10 hours postdose), Cycle 1/Day 15 (predose, between 0.5 and 4 hours postdose, and 6 and 10 hours postdose), and Day 1 of Cycles 2 though 4 (predose and between 2 and 12 hours postdose)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria Age greater than or equal to 18 years; Participants with histologically or cytologically confirmed non-squamous NSCLC with locally advanced or metastatic disease based on Tumor, Node, Metastasis (TNM) staging according to the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Cancer Staging Manual, Seventh Edition, who had failed at least two lines of systemic anticancer therapy for advanced or metastatic NSCLC (did not include adjuvant chemotherapy). In countries where erlotinib was approved and marketed for the treatment of NSCLC, participants must have received erlotinib treatment (or gefitinib for participants outside of the US) for their NSCLC if they had known EGFR-activating mutations. Participants of unknown EGFR status who had not received prior erlotinib (or gefitinib) should have been tested for EGFR-activating mutations prior to study entry. In countries where crizotinib was approved and marketed, participants must have received crizotinib treatment for NSCLC that was ALK-positive. Participants with ALK positive NCSLC or participants with KRAS mutations were not required to have prior treatment with erlotinib or gefitinib Participants must have at least 1 site of measurable disease by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1 (RECIST v.1.1); ECOG PS of 0 to 2; Participants must have adequate renal function as evidenced by serum creatinine less than or equal to 1.5 x upper limit of normal (ULN) or calculated creatinine clearance greater than or equal to 30 mL/min per the Cockcroft and Gault formula; Blood pressure must be well-controlled (less than or equal to140/90 mm Hg at Screening) with or without antihypertensive medication. Participants must have no history of hypertensive crisis or hypertensive encephalopathy; Participants must have adequate bone marrow function as evidenced by absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than or equal to 1.5 x 109/L, hemoglobin greater than or equal to 9.0 g/dL, and platelet count greater than or equal to 100 x 109/L; Participants must have adequate liver function as evidenced by bilirubin less than or equal to 1.5 times the ULN, and alkaline phosphatase, alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) less than or equal to 3 x ULN (in the case of liver metastases, less than or equal to 5 x ULN). Participants must have adequate coagulation system function as defined by prothrombin time/International normalized ratio (INR) less than or equal to 1.5 x ULN. Male or female participants of child-producing potential must agree to use double barrier contraception, oral contraceptives, or avoidance of pregnancy measures during the study and for 90 days after the last day of treatment; Females of childbearing potential must have a negative serum pregnancy test; Females may not be breastfeeding; Ability to understand and willingness to sign a written informed consent. Exclusion Criteria Prior therapy with E7080 or other small molecule vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitors; Presence of brain metastases, unless the participant has received adequate treatment at least 4 weeks prior to randomization, and is stable, asymptomatic, and off steroids for at least 4 weeks prior to randomization; Meningeal carcinomatosis; Received chemotherapy, targeted therapy, radiotherapy, surgery, or immunotherapy within the 21 days prior to commencing study treatment or have not recovered from all treatment-related toxicities to Grade less than or equal to 2, except for alopecia; Received treatment with another investigational agent within the 30 days prior to commencing study treatment or participants who have not recovered from side effects of an investigational drug to Grade less than or equal to 2, except for alopecia; Participants with proteinuria greater than 1+ on urine dipstick testing will undergo 24-hour urine collection for quantitative assessment of proteinuria. Participants with 24-hour urine protein greater than or equal to 1 g/24 hours will be ineligible; Serious non-healing wound, ulcer, bone fracture, or have undergone a major surgical procedure, open biopsy, or significant traumatic injury within the 28 days prior to commencing study treatment. Major surgery scheduled during the projected course of the study; History of bleeding diathesis or coagulopathy; Active hemoptysis (defined as bright red blood of a half teaspoon or more) within the 30 days prior to study entry; Refractory nausea and vomiting, malabsorption, significant bowel resection, or any other medical condition that would preclude adequate absorption or result in the inability to take oral medication; Other malignancy within 3 years of randomization, with the exception of adequately treated carcinoma in situ of the cervix or non-melanoma skin cancer, with no subsequent evidence of recurrence and/or malignancies diagnosed at a stage where definitive therapy results in near certain cures. Significant cardiovascular impairment (history of congestive heart failure New York Heart Association [NYHA] Class greater than II, unstable angina or myocardial infarction within the past 6 months, or serious cardiac arrhythmia); Any history of cerebral vascular accident (CVA), transient ischemic attack (TIA), or Grade greater than or equal to 2 peripheral vascular disease unless they have had no evidence of active disease for at least 6 months prior to randomization; History of abdominal fistula, gastrointestinal perforation, or intra-abdominal abscess within the 6 months prior to enrollment; Participants with organ allografts requiring immunosuppression; Known positive human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), known hepatitis B surface antigen, or hepatitis C positive; Hypersensitivity to E7080 or any of the excipients; Any history of or concomitant medical condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would compromise the participant's ability to safely complete the study.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Harish Dave
Organizational Affiliation
PharmaBio Development Inc.
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Donald W. Hill, M.D., F.A.C.P.
City
Casa Grande
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85122
Country
United States
Facility Name
Arizona Oncology Associates , PC - HOPE
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85710
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ronald Yanagihara, MD 9360 North Name Uno Suite 130 Gilroy California 95020
City
Gilroy
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95020
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ocala Oncology Center, P.L.
City
Ocala
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34471
Country
United States
Facility Name
Washington University 660 South Euclid Avenue Campus Box 8124 St Louis Missouri 63110
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States
Facility Name
New York Oncology Heamatology - Latham
City
Clifton Park
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
12065
Country
United States
Facility Name
Montefiore Medical Park 1695 Easchester Road Floor 1 Bronx, NY 10461
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10467
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cancer Treatment and Research Centre Bismarck North Dakota 58501
City
Bismarck
State/Province
North Dakota
ZIP/Postal Code
58501
Country
United States
Facility Name
Texas Oncology, P.A. - Paris
City
Paris
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75460
Country
United States
Facility Name
Texas Oncology, P.A. - Plano
City
Plano
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75093
Country
United States
Facility Name
Texas Oncology, P.A. - Waco
City
Waco
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76712
Country
United States
Facility Name
OLV Ziekenhuis
City
Aalst
ZIP/Postal Code
9300
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Grand Hopital de Charleroi
City
Charleroi
ZIP/Postal Code
6000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
AZ Sint-Maarten
City
Duffel
ZIP/Postal Code
2570
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
UZ Antwerpen
City
Edegem
ZIP/Postal Code
2650
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
UZ Leuven
City
Leuven
ZIP/Postal Code
3000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
C. H. R. de la Citadelle
City
Liege
ZIP/Postal Code
4000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Domaine Universitaire du Sart-Tilman
City
Liege
ZIP/Postal Code
4000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Institut onkologie a rehabilitace Na Plesi
City
Nova Ves pod Plesi
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Avicennus, s.r.o.
City
Nymburk
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Fakultni nemocnice Na Bulovce
City
Praha 8
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Oblastni nemocnice Pribram, a.s.
City
Pribram
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Semmelweis Egyetem AOK
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
1125
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Orszagos Koranyi TBC es Pulmonologiai Intezet
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
1529
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Matrai Gyogyintezet
City
Matrahaza
ZIP/Postal Code
3233
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Fejer Megyei Szent Gyorgy Korhaz
City
Szekesfehervar
ZIP/Postal Code
8000
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Komarom-Esztergom Megyei Onkorm. Szent Borbala Korhaza
City
Tatabanya
ZIP/Postal Code
2800
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Tudogyogyintezet Torokbalint
City
Torokbalint
ZIP/Postal Code
2045
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Zala Megyei Korhaz
City
Zalaegerszeg
ZIP/Postal Code
8900
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliera G. Rummo
City
Benevento
ZIP/Postal Code
82100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria San Martino
City
Genova
ZIP/Postal Code
16132
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliera San Gerardo
City
Milano
ZIP/Postal Code
20052
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
City
Milano
ZIP/Postal Code
20089
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria di Parma
City
Parma
ZIP/Postal Code
43100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri IRCCS
City
Pavia
ZIP/Postal Code
27100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliera di Perugia Ospedale S. Maria della Misericordia
City
Perugia
ZIP/Postal Code
6156
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini
City
Roma
ZIP/Postal Code
149
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Ospedale Mater Salutis
City
Verona
ZIP/Postal Code
37045
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Chungbuk National University Hospital
City
Chungcheongbuk-do
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital
City
Hwasun-gun
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Seoul National University Bundang Hospital
City
Seongnam-si
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Korea University Guro Hospital
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Severance Hospital, Yonsei University Health System
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
The Catholic University of Korea Yeouido St. Mary's Hospital
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Ulsan University Hospital
City
Ulsan
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
The Christie NHS Foundation Trust
City
Manchester
State/Province
Greater Manchester
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Southampton General Hospital
City
Southampton
State/Province
Hampshire
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
North Staffs Royal Infirmary
City
Stoke-on-Trent
State/Province
Staffordshire
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre
City
Glasgow
State/Province
Strathclyde
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
New Cross Hospital
City
Wolverhampton
State/Province
West Midlands
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

A Study Comparing the Combination of the Best Supportive Care Plus E7080 Versus Best Supportive Care Alone, in Patients With Advanced Lung Cancer or Lung Cancer That Has Spread, Who Have Been Previously Treated, Unsuccessfully, With at Least 2 Different Treatments

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs