Preliminary Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics Study of Nepadutant in Infant With Feeding Intolerance
Primary Purpose
Colic
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Nepadutant
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Colic focused on measuring Feeding intolerance, Infant, tachykinin antagonist, Infant colic, Nepadutant
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Infants with a clinical diagnosis of feeding intolerance.
- Age ≤ 6 months at the enrolment.
- Normal growth.
- Infants who can refrain from use of erythromycin, metoclopramide, antihistaminic drug, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), antacids, antimuscarinic drugs, simethicone and dimethicone from 1 week prior randomization until end of study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any clinically relevant event (excluding those relevant to the condition under study) which has occurred within one week prior to randomization.
- Any pharmacological treatment starting within one week prior to randomization.
- Infants for whom a change in the diet (i.e. weaning) has been performed within one week prior to randomization or is planned during the study period.
Sites / Locations
- Arkansas Children's Hospital
- Children's Center for Digestive Healthcare
- Kosair Charities Pediatric Clinical Research Unit / University of Louisville
- SUNY Downstate Medical Center
- The University of Toledo College of Medicine\The Toledo Children's Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Experimental
Arm Label
Cohort 3
Cohort 2
Cohort 1
Arm Description
Nepadutant low dose (0.1mg/kg) for 7 days followed by Nepadutant high dose (1mg/kg) for additional 7 days
Nepadutant medium dose (0.5mg/kg) for 7 days followed by Nepadutant high dose (1mg/kg) for additional 7 days
Nepadutant low dose (0.1mg/kg) for 7 days followed by Nepadutant medium dose (0.5mg/kg) for additional 7 days
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
The Absolute Differences of I-GERQ-R Total Score at V3 (End of First Week of Treatment) Respect to the Baseline (V2).
Results obtained at V2 serve as baseline values for the assessment of effects at V3 (i.e. end of first week of treatment).
Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R ), with a minimum-maximum score of 0-42 (minimum for diagnosis >15). The higher values reflect worse outcome. The questionnaire comprised 12 items as questions quantifying aspects of regurgitation (3 questions), crying (3 questions), feeding refusal (2 questions), apnea/cyanosis (2 questions), hiccups and arching. Questions with 4 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 3; questions with 5 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 4.
The scores of each item are summed, so the total score is presented.
The Absolute Differences of I-GERQ-R Total Score at V4 (End of 2nd Week of Treatment) Respect to V3 (End of 1st Week of Treatment).
The results obtained at V3 are used as baseline for the second week treatment period (V4).
Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R ), with a minimum-maximum score of 0-42 (minimum for diagnosis >15). The higher values reflect worse outcome. The questionnaire comprised 12 items as questions quantifying aspects of regurgitation (3 questions), crying (3 questions), feeding refusal (2 questions), apnea/cyanosis (2 questions), hiccups and arching. Questions with 4 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 3; questions with 5 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 4.
The scores of each item are summed, so the total score is presented.
The Absolute Differences of I-GERQ-R Total Score at V5 (Follow-up) Respect to V2 (Baseline).
Results obtained at V2 serve as baseline values for follow-up assessment 2 weeks after the last administered dose (V5) Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R ), with a minimum-maximum score of 0-42 (minimum for diagnosis >15). The higher values reflect worse outcome. The questionnaire comprised 12 items as questions quantifying aspects of regurgitation (3 questions), crying (3 questions), feeding refusal (2 questions), apnea/cyanosis (2 questions), hiccups and arching. Questions with 4 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 3; questions with 5 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 4.
The scores of each item are summed, so the total score is presented.
I-GERQ-R Score Changes vs Baseline (Visit 2) by First Dose Level (0.1mg/kg and 0.5mg/kg).
Change in Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R) Score. Assessing the I-GERQ-R score changes vs baseline (Visit 2) by first dose level (0.1mg/kg and 0.5mg/kg). Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R ), with a minimum-maximum score of 0-42 (minimum for diagnosis >15). The higher values reflect worse outcome. The questionnaire comprised 12 items as questions quantifying aspects of regurgitation (3 questions), crying (3 questions), feeding refusal (2 questions), apnea/cyanosis (2 questions), hiccups and arching. Questions with 4 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 3; questions with 5 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 4.
The scores of each item are summed, so the total score is presented.
I-GERQ-R Score Changes vs Visit 3 by Second Dose Level (0.5mg/kg and 1mg/kg).
Change in Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R) Score. Assessing the I-GERQ-R score changes vs Visit 3 by second dose level (0.5mg/kg and 1mg/kg).
Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R ), with a minimum-maximum score of 0-42 (minimum for diagnosis >15). The higher values reflect worse outcome. The questionnaire comprised 12 items as questions quantifying aspects of regurgitation (3 questions), crying (3 questions), feeding refusal (2 questions), apnea/cyanosis (2 questions), hiccups and arching. Questions with 4 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 3; questions with 5 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 4.
The scores of each item are summed, so the total score is presented.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Incidence and Severity of AEs_ Number of Adverse Events by Treatment Dose Level
The analysis is by treatment - Each infant was treated with two out of three ascending dose (0.1, 0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg), therefore counted in more than one dose level.
A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Characterize the Plasma Concentration-time Course for Nepadutant in Infant With Colics From NIC-04
The population pharmacokinetic analyses is presented. PopPK Clearance estimated with a one compartment model with first order absorption and elimination.
A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Characterize the Plasma Concentration-time Course for Nepadutant in Infant With Colics From NIC-04
PopPK Volume estimated with a one compartment model with first order absorption and elimination. NOTE: for this measure, no inter-individual variability was estimated, therefore the value for each cohort corresponds to the typical value.
A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Characterize the Plasma Concentration-time Course for Nepadutant in Infant With Colics From NIC-04
The population pharmacokinetic analyses is presented. PopPK Ka estimated with a one compartment model with first order absorption and elimination. NOTE: for this measure, no inter-individual variability was estimated, therefore the value for each cohort corresponds to the typical value.
A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Characterize the Plasma Concentration-time Course for Nepadutant in Infant With Colics From NIC-04
The population pharmacokinetic analyses is presented. The PopPK parameter fraction of the dose absorbed (F1) is estimated with a one compartment model with first order absorption and elimination.The results are presented fraction of the absorbed dose with 95% CI of the parameter estimate value
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01532518
Brief Title
Preliminary Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics Study of Nepadutant in Infant With Feeding Intolerance
Official Title
A Multicenter, Open Label, Ascending 7 Day-Repeated Dose Study to Investigate Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics of Nepadutant In Infants With Feeding Intolerance
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
August 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
July 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2012 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Menarini Group
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The present pilot study is aimed to obtain preliminary data on the effect of three ascending oral dose levels of nepadutant on the relief of symptoms associated with feeding intolerance. In addition, the assessment of drug exposure (PK assessment) will provide additional information on the dose-effect relationship, thus supporting the dose selection and dosing schedule in the future studies.
Detailed Description
Feeding intolerance is a transient neuro-developmental phenomenon affecting 25% to 40% of infant and toddler, with a peak at 6 weeks of age. Feeding problems include mainly vomiting, slow feeding, refusal to eat and colic.
Current non pharmacological interventions (e.g. message, restriction in maternal diet in breast-feeding infants) and pharmacological treatments (simethicone, antimuscarinic drugs and antiacids) are largely unsatisfactory.
Nepadutant is postulated to have a therapeutic effect in infant colic since it reverts exaggerated intestinal motility and sensitivity induced by different stimuli through the activation of neurokinin-2 receptors, without interferring on the on physiological gastrointestinal transit.
This phase IIa study is designed to test in each participant infant two out of three oral doses of nepadutant in order to measure its blood levels, safety and efficacy with each dose level to be given for 7 concecutive days.
The experimental clinical phase encompasses the following periods:
Screening period (no study medication), lasting approximately 7 days prior to randomization
Treatment period, lasting fourteen days (7 days fore each dose)with once daily administration
A safety follow-up visit, approximately four weeks after start of treatment.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Colic
Keywords
Feeding intolerance, Infant, tachykinin antagonist, Infant colic, Nepadutant
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
27 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Cohort 3
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Nepadutant low dose (0.1mg/kg) for 7 days followed by Nepadutant high dose (1mg/kg) for additional 7 days
Arm Title
Cohort 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Nepadutant medium dose (0.5mg/kg) for 7 days followed by Nepadutant high dose (1mg/kg) for additional 7 days
Arm Title
Cohort 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Nepadutant low dose (0.1mg/kg) for 7 days followed by Nepadutant medium dose (0.5mg/kg) for additional 7 days
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Nepadutant
Other Intervention Name(s)
MEN 11420
Intervention Description
Nepadutant oral solution
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The Absolute Differences of I-GERQ-R Total Score at V3 (End of First Week of Treatment) Respect to the Baseline (V2).
Description
Results obtained at V2 serve as baseline values for the assessment of effects at V3 (i.e. end of first week of treatment).
Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R ), with a minimum-maximum score of 0-42 (minimum for diagnosis >15). The higher values reflect worse outcome. The questionnaire comprised 12 items as questions quantifying aspects of regurgitation (3 questions), crying (3 questions), feeding refusal (2 questions), apnea/cyanosis (2 questions), hiccups and arching. Questions with 4 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 3; questions with 5 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 4.
The scores of each item are summed, so the total score is presented.
Time Frame
Baseline (V2) and end of first week of treatment (V3)
Title
The Absolute Differences of I-GERQ-R Total Score at V4 (End of 2nd Week of Treatment) Respect to V3 (End of 1st Week of Treatment).
Description
The results obtained at V3 are used as baseline for the second week treatment period (V4).
Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R ), with a minimum-maximum score of 0-42 (minimum for diagnosis >15). The higher values reflect worse outcome. The questionnaire comprised 12 items as questions quantifying aspects of regurgitation (3 questions), crying (3 questions), feeding refusal (2 questions), apnea/cyanosis (2 questions), hiccups and arching. Questions with 4 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 3; questions with 5 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 4.
The scores of each item are summed, so the total score is presented.
Time Frame
V3 (end of 1st week of treatment) and V4 (end of 2nd week of treatment)
Title
The Absolute Differences of I-GERQ-R Total Score at V5 (Follow-up) Respect to V2 (Baseline).
Description
Results obtained at V2 serve as baseline values for follow-up assessment 2 weeks after the last administered dose (V5) Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R ), with a minimum-maximum score of 0-42 (minimum for diagnosis >15). The higher values reflect worse outcome. The questionnaire comprised 12 items as questions quantifying aspects of regurgitation (3 questions), crying (3 questions), feeding refusal (2 questions), apnea/cyanosis (2 questions), hiccups and arching. Questions with 4 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 3; questions with 5 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 4.
The scores of each item are summed, so the total score is presented.
Time Frame
Baseline (V2) and follow up 2 weeks after the last administered dose (V5)
Title
I-GERQ-R Score Changes vs Baseline (Visit 2) by First Dose Level (0.1mg/kg and 0.5mg/kg).
Description
Change in Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R) Score. Assessing the I-GERQ-R score changes vs baseline (Visit 2) by first dose level (0.1mg/kg and 0.5mg/kg). Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R ), with a minimum-maximum score of 0-42 (minimum for diagnosis >15). The higher values reflect worse outcome. The questionnaire comprised 12 items as questions quantifying aspects of regurgitation (3 questions), crying (3 questions), feeding refusal (2 questions), apnea/cyanosis (2 questions), hiccups and arching. Questions with 4 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 3; questions with 5 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 4.
The scores of each item are summed, so the total score is presented.
Time Frame
Baseline (V2) and end of 1st week of treatment(V3)
Title
I-GERQ-R Score Changes vs Visit 3 by Second Dose Level (0.5mg/kg and 1mg/kg).
Description
Change in Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R) Score. Assessing the I-GERQ-R score changes vs Visit 3 by second dose level (0.5mg/kg and 1mg/kg).
Infant Gastroesophageal Reflux Questionnaire Revised (I-GERQ-R ), with a minimum-maximum score of 0-42 (minimum for diagnosis >15). The higher values reflect worse outcome. The questionnaire comprised 12 items as questions quantifying aspects of regurgitation (3 questions), crying (3 questions), feeding refusal (2 questions), apnea/cyanosis (2 questions), hiccups and arching. Questions with 4 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 3; questions with 5 possible options have a score ranging from 0 to 4.
The scores of each item are summed, so the total score is presented.
Time Frame
end of first week of treatment (V3) and end of second week of treatment (V4)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Incidence and Severity of AEs_ Number of Adverse Events by Treatment Dose Level
Description
The analysis is by treatment - Each infant was treated with two out of three ascending dose (0.1, 0.5 or 1.0 mg/kg), therefore counted in more than one dose level.
Time Frame
up to 4 weeks
Title
A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Characterize the Plasma Concentration-time Course for Nepadutant in Infant With Colics From NIC-04
Description
The population pharmacokinetic analyses is presented. PopPK Clearance estimated with a one compartment model with first order absorption and elimination.
Time Frame
0.5, 1, 2, 3 hours post Single Dose and 24 hours post Repeated Dose
Title
A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Characterize the Plasma Concentration-time Course for Nepadutant in Infant With Colics From NIC-04
Description
PopPK Volume estimated with a one compartment model with first order absorption and elimination. NOTE: for this measure, no inter-individual variability was estimated, therefore the value for each cohort corresponds to the typical value.
Time Frame
0.5, 1, 2, 3 hours post Single Dose and 24 hours post Repeated Dose
Title
A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Characterize the Plasma Concentration-time Course for Nepadutant in Infant With Colics From NIC-04
Description
The population pharmacokinetic analyses is presented. PopPK Ka estimated with a one compartment model with first order absorption and elimination. NOTE: for this measure, no inter-individual variability was estimated, therefore the value for each cohort corresponds to the typical value.
Time Frame
0.5, 1, 2, 3 hours post Single Dose and 24 hours post Repeated Dose
Title
A Population Pharmacokinetic Analysis to Characterize the Plasma Concentration-time Course for Nepadutant in Infant With Colics From NIC-04
Description
The population pharmacokinetic analyses is presented. The PopPK parameter fraction of the dose absorbed (F1) is estimated with a one compartment model with first order absorption and elimination.The results are presented fraction of the absorbed dose with 95% CI of the parameter estimate value
Time Frame
0.5, 1, 2, 3 hours post Single Dose and 24 hours post Repeated Dose
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
6 Months
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Infants with a clinical diagnosis of feeding intolerance.
Age ≤ 6 months at the enrolment.
Normal growth.
Infants who can refrain from use of erythromycin, metoclopramide, antihistaminic drug, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), antacids, antimuscarinic drugs, simethicone and dimethicone from 1 week prior randomization until end of study.
Exclusion Criteria:
Any clinically relevant event (excluding those relevant to the condition under study) which has occurred within one week prior to randomization.
Any pharmacological treatment starting within one week prior to randomization.
Infants for whom a change in the diet (i.e. weaning) has been performed within one week prior to randomization or is planned during the study period.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jeffrey L Blumer, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
The University of Toledo Medical Center 3000 Arlington Avenue, Toledo OH 43614 USA
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Arkansas Children's Hospital
City
Little Rock
State/Province
Arkansas
ZIP/Postal Code
72202
Country
United States
Facility Name
Children's Center for Digestive Healthcare
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30342
Country
United States
Facility Name
Kosair Charities Pediatric Clinical Research Unit / University of Louisville
City
Louisville
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40202
Country
United States
Facility Name
SUNY Downstate Medical Center
City
Albany
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
12207
Country
United States
Facility Name
The University of Toledo College of Medicine\The Toledo Children's Hospital
City
Toledo
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43606
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Preliminary Efficacy, Safety and Pharmacokinetics Study of Nepadutant in Infant With Feeding Intolerance
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs