search
Back to results

Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol-Remifentanil Conscious Sedation for Awake Craniotomy for Tumor Surgery

Primary Purpose

Brain Tumor

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Dexmedetomidine
Propofol
Remifentanil
Sponsored by
Nicolai Goettel
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Brain Tumor focused on measuring dexmedetomidine, conscious sedation, awake craniotomy, brain mapping

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patients more than 18 years of age.
  • ASA score I, II and III.
  • Patients scheduled to undergo awake craniotomy for elective tumor resection.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with allergies to the drugs being used.
  • Patients who are pregnant.
  • Patients with alcohol or substance abuse.
  • Patients who are not able to understand the instructions for an awake craniotomy and questions regarding intra-operative pain, and post-operative satisfaction.
  • Lack of informed consent.

Sites / Locations

  • UHN Toronto Western Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Propofol-Remifentanil

Dexmedetomidine

Arm Description

Group I. (propofol/remifentanil): Infusions begin at remifentanil (0.01-0.1 mcg/kg/min) and propofol (25-250 mcg/kg/min) for 15 min, and then titrated to effect.

Group II. (dexmedetomidine): The infusion begins at 0.3-0.4 mcg/kg/hr for 15 min, and then titrated down to 0.1-0.2 mcg/kg/hr.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Ability to perform intra-operative mapping during awake craniotomy

Secondary Outcome Measures

Incidence of complications (respiratory depression, failure to provide adequate analgesia)
Patient and surgeon satisfaction to the corresponding anesthetic technique

Full Information

First Posted
February 29, 2012
Last Updated
July 5, 2016
Sponsor
Nicolai Goettel
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01545297
Brief Title
Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol-Remifentanil Conscious Sedation for Awake Craniotomy for Tumor Surgery
Official Title
Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol-Remifentanil Conscious Sedation for Awake Craniotomy for Tumor Surgery: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 2012 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 2014 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Nicolai Goettel

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Awake craniotomy for resection of brain tumor located in close proximity to areas of eloquent brain function, such as speech, motor and sensory, is an accepted procedure used to minimize neurological injury during resection. During awake craniotomy, anesthesia is usually provided using a combination of local anesthesia (regional scalp block and/or local infiltration) and intravenous (IV) agents to provide sedation, anxiolysis and analgesia. Propofol sedation, commonly in combination with a shorter acting opioid such as fentanyl, or remifentanil, is an effective and popular technique during awake craniotomy, achieving a high degree of patient satisfaction and acceptance. Most of the anesthetic agents are associated with some respiratory depression. The anesthetic agent called dexmedetomidine is a potent, highly selective α2-adrenoceptor agonist. The effects of dexmedetomidine are anxiolysis, analgesia, sedation and sympatholysis, and it is not associated with respiratory depressive effect. Bekker et al. first reported the successful use of dexmedetomidine in awake craniotomy in 2001. The purpose of this blinded, prospective, randomized study is to compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus propofol-remifentanil based sedation in patients undergoing awake craniotomy for resection of tumors. The study hypothesis is that the efficacy of performing intra-operative brain mapping is identical between dexmedetomidine and the propofol-remifentanil based sedation. The primary end-points are to assess the ability to perform intraoperative mapping during awake craniotomy. Secondary end-points will assess the incidence of complications (respiratory depression, failure to provide adequate analgesia), as well as patient and surgeon satisfaction to the corresponding anesthetic technique.
Detailed Description
Awake craniotomy for resection of brain tumor located in close proximity to areas of eloquent brain function, such as speech, motor and sensory, is an accepted procedure used to minimize neurological injury during resection. The level of sedation and analgesia during the different stages of surgery varies, but importantly, the patient needs to be awake and alert during brain mapping. During awake craniotomy, anesthesia is usually provided using a combination of local anesthesia (regional scalp block and/or local infiltration) and intravenous (IV) agents to provide sedation, anxiolysis and analgesia. There is considerable variation in the anesthetic management of the awake craniotomy in different institutions. Propofol sedation, commonly in combination with a shorter acting opioid such as fentanyl, or remifentanil, is an effective and popular technique during awake craniotomy, achieving a high degree of patient satisfaction and acceptance. However, the awake craniotomy remains one of the most challenging techniques of anesthesia care in terms of balancing an adequate depth of sedation and analgesia to combat the rapid changes of surgical stimulation yet having an alert patient for brain mapping. Furthermore, most of the anesthetic agents are associated with some respiratory depression. A newer anesthetic agent called dexmedetomidine (Precedex (TM), Hospira Healthcare Corporation, Saint Laurent, Québec, Canada) is a potent, highly selective α2-adrenoceptor agonist with an α2:α1 selectivity ratio of 1600:1. It has been available in the Canada since 2009 as a short-term sedative agent, and is available in the UHN. The use of dexmedetomidine has been in mechanically ventilated patients in ICU and for intra-operative sedation. The well-documented beneficial effects of dexmedetomidine are anxiolysis, analgesia, sedation and sympatholysis, and it is not associated with respiratory depressive effect. Dexmedetomidine has been successfully used to provide sedation in dental procedures, awake fibreoptic intubation, bariatric surgery and morbidly obese patients, as well as obstructive sleep apnea patients. The pharmacokinetic properties of dexmedetomidine is very predictable and titratable, with a rapid distribution half-life (t1/2α) being approximately 5-6min and an elimination half-life (t1/2β) of approximately 2h. Bekker et al. first reported the successful use of dexmedetomidine in awake craniotomy in 2001. Subsequent case series published by Souter et al. demonstrated that dexmedetomidine can be used either as a sole agent or in combination with other agents such as fentanyl during seizure foci resection with accurate intraoperative brain mapping. The hypnotic effect of dexmedetomidine is mediated by the hyperpolarization of noradrenergic neurons in the locus ceruleus, which proposed that dexmedetomidine converges on a natural sleep pathway to exert its sedative effect. Venn and co-workers, as part of a large European multicentre trial investigating dexmedetomidine for postoperative sedation in the ICU, reported that: "Patients are calmly and easily roused from sleep to allow excellent communication and cooperation while intubated and ventilated, and then similarly quickly return to sleep". This unique sedation state is very useful for awake craniotomy, which requires deep level of sedation during painful operative procedures, as well as easily rousable state during mapping of eloquent function. The purpose of this blinded, prospective, randomized study is to compare the efficacy of dexmedetomidine versus propofol-remifentanil based sedation in patients undergoing awake craniotomy for resection of tumors. The study hypothesis is that the efficacy of performing intra-operative brain mapping is identical between dexmedetomidine and the propofol-remifentanil based sedation. The primary end-points are to assess the ability to perform intraoperative mapping during awake craniotomy. Secondary end-points will assess the incidence of complications (respiratory depression, failure to provide adequate analgesia), as well as patient and surgeon satisfaction to the corresponding anesthetic technique.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Brain Tumor
Keywords
dexmedetomidine, conscious sedation, awake craniotomy, brain mapping

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
50 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Propofol-Remifentanil
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Group I. (propofol/remifentanil): Infusions begin at remifentanil (0.01-0.1 mcg/kg/min) and propofol (25-250 mcg/kg/min) for 15 min, and then titrated to effect.
Arm Title
Dexmedetomidine
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Group II. (dexmedetomidine): The infusion begins at 0.3-0.4 mcg/kg/hr for 15 min, and then titrated down to 0.1-0.2 mcg/kg/hr.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Dexmedetomidine
Other Intervention Name(s)
Precedex (TM)
Intervention Description
The infusion begins at dexmedetomidine 0.3-0.4 mcg/kg/hr for 15 min, and then titrated down to 0.1-0.2 mcg/kg/hr.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Propofol
Other Intervention Name(s)
Diprivan (TM)
Intervention Description
The infusion begins at propofol 25-250 mcg/kg/min for 15 min, and then titrated to effect.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Remifentanil
Other Intervention Name(s)
Ultiva (TM)
Intervention Description
The infusion begins at remifentanil 0.01-0.1 mcg/kg/min for 15 min, and then titrated to effect.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Ability to perform intra-operative mapping during awake craniotomy
Time Frame
immediately, intra-operative
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Incidence of complications (respiratory depression, failure to provide adequate analgesia)
Time Frame
intra-operatively, 2h post-operatively, 24h post-operatively
Title
Patient and surgeon satisfaction to the corresponding anesthetic technique
Time Frame
intra-opeartively, 2h post-operatively, 24h post-operatively

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Adult patients more than 18 years of age. ASA score I, II and III. Patients scheduled to undergo awake craniotomy for elective tumor resection. Exclusion Criteria: Patients with allergies to the drugs being used. Patients who are pregnant. Patients with alcohol or substance abuse. Patients who are not able to understand the instructions for an awake craniotomy and questions regarding intra-operative pain, and post-operative satisfaction. Lack of informed consent.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Pirjo Manninen, MD, FRCPC
Organizational Affiliation
Head of Neuroanesthesia, Associate Professor, University Health Network, Department of Anesthesia, University of Toronto, Canada
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Nicolai Goettel, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University Health Network, Department of Anesthesia, University of Toronto, Canada
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
UHN Toronto Western Hospital
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M5T 2S8
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17639865
Citation
Serletis D, Bernstein M. Prospective study of awake craniotomy used routinely and nonselectively for supratentorial tumors. J Neurosurg. 2007 Jul;107(1):1-6. doi: 10.3171/JNS-07/07/0001.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11133607
Citation
Blanshard HJ, Chung F, Manninen PH, Taylor MD, Bernstein M. Awake craniotomy for removal of intracranial tumor: considerations for early discharge. Anesth Analg. 2001 Jan;92(1):89-94. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200101000-00018.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9438615
Citation
Johnson KB, Egan TD. Remifentanil and propofol combination for awake craniotomy: case report with pharmacokinetic simulations. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 1998 Jan;10(1):25-9. doi: 10.1097/00008506-199801000-00006. Erratum In: J Neurosurg Anesthesiol 1998 Apr;10(2):69.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11426102
Citation
Berkenstadt H, Perel A, Hadani M, Unofrievich I, Ram Z. Monitored anesthesia care using remifentanil and propofol for awake craniotomy. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2001 Jul;13(3):246-9. doi: 10.1097/00008506-200107000-00013.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12538371
Citation
Sarang A, Dinsmore J. Anaesthesia for awake craniotomy--evolution of a technique that facilitates awake neurological testing. Br J Anaesth. 2003 Feb;90(2):161-5. doi: 10.1093/bja/aeg037.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1440214
Citation
Silbergeld DL, Mueller WM, Colley PS, Ojemann GA, Lettich E. Use of propofol (Diprivan) for awake craniotomies: technical note. Surg Neurol. 1992 Oct;38(4):271-2. doi: 10.1016/0090-3019(92)90038-o.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10636615
Citation
Coles JP, Leary TS, Monteiro JN, Brazier P, Summors A, Doyle P, Matta BF, Gupta AK. Propofol anesthesia for craniotomy: a double-blind comparison of remifentanil, alfentanil, and fentanyl. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2000 Jan;12(1):15-20. doi: 10.1097/00008506-200001000-00004.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1978615
Citation
From RP, Warner DS, Todd MM, Sokoll MD. Anesthesia for craniotomy: a double-blind comparison of alfentanil, fentanyl, and sufentanil. Anesthesiology. 1990 Nov;73(5):896-904.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16368836
Citation
Manninen PH, Balki M, Lukitto K, Bernstein M. Patient satisfaction with awake craniotomy for tumor surgery: a comparison of remifentanil and fentanyl in conjunction with propofol. Anesth Analg. 2006 Jan;102(1):237-42. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000181287.86811.5C.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10730549
Citation
Bhana N, Goa KL, McClellan KJ. Dexmedetomidine. Drugs. 2000 Feb;59(2):263-8; discussion 269-70. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200059020-00012.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11046225
Citation
Kamibayashi T, Maze M. Clinical uses of alpha2 -adrenergic agonists. Anesthesiology. 2000 Nov;93(5):1345-9. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200011000-00030. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17924894
Citation
Cheung CW, Ying CL, Chiu WK, Wong GT, Ng KF, Irwin MG. A comparison of dexmedetomidine and midazolam for sedation in third molar surgery. Anaesthesia. 2007 Nov;62(11):1132-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05230.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19142095
Citation
Bamgbade OA, Alfa JA. Dexmedetomidine anaesthesia for patients with obstructive sleep apnoea undergoing bariatric surgery. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2009 Feb;26(2):176-7. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32831a47cb. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19852868
Citation
Chawla S, Robinson S, Norton A, Esterman A, Taneerananon T. Peri-operative use of dexmedetomidine in airway reconstruction surgery for obstructive sleep apnoea. J Laryngol Otol. 2010 Jan;124(1):67-72. doi: 10.1017/S002221510999123X. Epub 2009 Oct 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16980164
Citation
Ramsay MA, Saha D, Hebeler RF. Tracheal resection in the morbidly obese patient: the role of dexmedetomidine. J Clin Anesth. 2006 Sep;18(6):452-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2006.02.004.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11571417
Citation
Coursin DB, Coursin DB, Maccioli GA. Dexmedetomidine. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2001 Aug;7(4):221-6. doi: 10.1097/00075198-200108000-00002.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11323355
Citation
Bekker AY, Kaufman B, Samir H, Doyle W. The use of dexmedetomidine infusion for awake craniotomy. Anesth Analg. 2001 May;92(5):1251-3. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200105000-00031. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17198099
Citation
Souter MJ, Rozet I, Ojemann JG, Souter KJ, Holmes MD, Lee L, Lam AM. Dexmedetomidine sedation during awake craniotomy for seizure resection: effects on electrocorticography. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2007 Jan;19(1):38-44. doi: 10.1097/01.ana.0000211027.26550.24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17959954
Citation
Oda Y, Toriyama S, Tanaka K, Matsuura T, Hamaoka N, Morino M, Asada A. The effect of dexmedetomidine on electrocorticography in patients with temporal lobe epilepsy under sevoflurane anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 2007 Nov;105(5):1272-7, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000281075.77316.98.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12552203
Citation
Nelson LE, Lu J, Guo T, Saper CB, Franks NP, Maze M. The alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist dexmedetomidine converges on an endogenous sleep-promoting pathway to exert its sedative effects. Anesthesiology. 2003 Feb;98(2):428-36. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200302000-00024.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10594409
Citation
Venn RM, Bradshaw CJ, Spencer R, Brealey D, Caudwell E, Naughton C, Vedio A, Singer M, Feneck R, Treacher D, Willatts SM, Grounds RM. Preliminary UK experience of dexmedetomidine, a novel agent for postoperative sedation in the intensive care unit. Anaesthesia. 1999 Dec;54(12):1136-42. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.01114.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20118799
Citation
Conte V, Magni L, Songa V, Tomaselli P, Ghisoni L, Magnoni S, Bello L, Stocchetti N. Analysis of propofol/remifentanil infusion protocol for tumor surgery with intraoperative brain mapping. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2010 Apr;22(2):119-27. doi: 10.1097/ANA.0b013e3181c959f4.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14676565
Citation
Mack PF, Perrine K, Kobylarz E, Schwartz TH, Lien CA. Dexmedetomidine and neurocognitive testing in awake craniotomy. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 2004 Jan;16(1):20-5. doi: 10.1097/00008506-200401000-00005.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2286697
Citation
Chernik DA, Gillings D, Laine H, Hendler J, Silver JM, Davidson AB, Schwam EM, Siegel JL. Validity and reliability of the Observer's Assessment of Alertness/Sedation Scale: study with intravenous midazolam. J Clin Psychopharmacol. 1990 Aug;10(4):244-51.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27099154
Citation
Goettel N, Bharadwaj S, Venkatraghavan L, Mehta J, Bernstein M, Manninen PH. Dexmedetomidine vs propofol-remifentanil conscious sedation for awake craniotomy: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Br J Anaesth. 2016 Jun;116(6):811-21. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew024. Epub 2016 Apr 20.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Comparison of Dexmedetomidine and Propofol-Remifentanil Conscious Sedation for Awake Craniotomy for Tumor Surgery

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs