Utility of Sputum Induction and Novel Technologies to Improve TB Diagnosis in a High HIV Prevalence Primary Care Setting (SINET)
Primary Purpose
Tuberculosis
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
South Africa
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Sputum induction
standard routine expectorated sputum
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Tuberculosis focused on measuring Tuberculosis, diagnosis, sputum induction, primary care
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- 2x smear negative or sputum scarce TB suspects
- Primary care patient (not referred by doctor)
- Adult patients (>18 years)
- Able to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Not meeting inclusion criteria
- <18 years
- Unable to provide informed consent
Sites / Locations
- University of Cape Town
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Sputum induction
No sputum induction
Arm Description
Enrolled patients receive sputum induction (using ultrasonic nebulisation with hypertonic saline)
Enrolled patients randomised to this study arm will receive an observed expectorated sputum collection attempt. Research nurses train study patients on the method of producing sputum spontaneously.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Time-to-treatment initiation
Time-specific proportion of patients initiated on TB treatment between study arms Time-points to be analysed include 3, 5, 7, 10, 14, 21, 48 days from enrollment.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Diagnostic yield of sputum culture
Difference in diagnostic yield of a single sputum TB culture between study arms.
This will compare the single induced or expectorated sputum sample collected at study enrollment.
Diagnostic yield and accuracy of sputum smear microscopy
Difference in diagnostic yield and accuracy of a single sputum TB smear between study arms.
This will compare the single induced or expectorated sputum sample collected at study enrollment.
Liquid TB culture will be used as the reference standard for assessment of diagnostic accuracy Fluorescence smear microscopy will be performed on auramine-O stained concentrated samples
Feasibility of sputum induction in primary care clinics
Feasibility and robustness of performing sputum induction in primary care clinics (measures include - sputum induction failure rates, turn-around-time, user appraisals and evaluation)
Safety and tolerability of sputum induction performed in primary care clinics
Side-effects of sputum induction procedures Number of induced sputum procedures terminated because of patient side-effects and safety
Diagnostic yield and accuracy of additional diagnostics including Xpert MTB/RIF assay, MODS and Genotype MTBDRplus
Difference in diagnostic yield and accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF, MODS liquid culture and the Genotype MTBDRplus on a single induced or expectorated sputum sample collected at enrollment.
Liquid TB culture will be used as the reference standard for diagnostic accuracy measures.
Cost-analysis of sputum induction for primary care clinics
Based on diagnostic accuracy measures of different diagnostic tests between the induced sputum and standard care groups, cost-of-diagnosis will be calculated and compared
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01545661
First Posted
July 7, 2011
Last Updated
December 21, 2012
Sponsor
University of Cape Town
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01545661
Brief Title
Utility of Sputum Induction and Novel Technologies to Improve TB Diagnosis in a High HIV Prevalence Primary Care Setting
Acronym
SINET
Official Title
A Randomised Control Trial of Sputum Induction, and New and Emerging Technologies in a High HIV Prevalence Primary Care Setting
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
December 2012
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2012 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Cape Town
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This study will investigate the benefit of using Sputum induction for TB diagnosis in a primary care clinic for adult TB suspects that are either unable to produce a sputum sample (sputum scarce) or on initial diagnostic work-up have 2 negative sputum smear samples (WHO standard for frontline TB diagnosis). The investigators hypothesize that acquiring an induced sputum sample for smear microscopy and liquid TB culture will decrease time-to-diagnosis and time-to-treatment initiation in smear negative/sputum scarce TB patients in a primary care clinic in a resource-limited high TB HIV prevalent setting.
Detailed Description
Tuberculosis is on the increase in Africa. A key area of weakness in TB control efforts is the inability to make a rapid diagnosis. This is, in part, due to the inability to obtain representative biological samples and the non-availability of cheap, effective, rapid and field-friendly diagnostic tools. Indeed, in HIV positive patients, where the sensitivity of sputum smear is as low as 20%, culture results take several weeks and a significant proportion of patients do not expectorate sputum. Sputum induction for the diagnosis of TB has been evaluated in several studies, has been shown to have a good yield, feasibility and safety when performed correctly, and with diagnostic comparability to bronchoscopy. Few studies have evaluated the performance of induced sputum outside of the hospital environment and the tolerability, yield and performance outcome of sputum induction in a primary care facility has yet to be evaluated. The objective of this study is two-fold. We seek to evaluate, through a randomized controlled trial, the feasibility, performance outcomes and impact on time-to-diagnosis and -treatment of sputum induction, in a high HIV prevalence primary care setting, for the diagnosis of smear negative/ sputum scarce TB. We hypothesize that acquiring an induced sputum sample for smear microscopy and liquid TB culture will decrease time-to-diagnosis and time-to-treatment initiation in smear negative/sputum scarce TB patients in a primary care clinic in a resource-limited high TB HIV prevalent setting. We will also evaluate the potential incremental benefit of novel technologies to improve the rapidity and diagnostic yield using induced sputum samples (Xpert MTB/RIF assay, microscopic observation drug susceptibility testing (MODS) and the Genotype MTB DRplus line probe assay).
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Tuberculosis
Keywords
Tuberculosis, diagnosis, sputum induction, primary care
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Factorial Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
517 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Sputum induction
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Enrolled patients receive sputum induction (using ultrasonic nebulisation with hypertonic saline)
Arm Title
No sputum induction
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Enrolled patients randomised to this study arm will receive an observed expectorated sputum collection attempt. Research nurses train study patients on the method of producing sputum spontaneously.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Sputum induction
Intervention Description
Ultrasonic nebulisation 3% hypertonic saline nebulised for duration of 20 mins
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
standard routine expectorated sputum
Intervention Description
Patients in the control group are trained by the research staff to produce sputum but no device is utilized. Sputum is spontaneously expectorated where possible
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time-to-treatment initiation
Description
Time-specific proportion of patients initiated on TB treatment between study arms Time-points to be analysed include 3, 5, 7, 10, 14, 21, 48 days from enrollment.
Time Frame
Up to 48 days after enrollment
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Diagnostic yield of sputum culture
Description
Difference in diagnostic yield of a single sputum TB culture between study arms.
This will compare the single induced or expectorated sputum sample collected at study enrollment.
Time Frame
Up to 2 months after enrollment
Title
Diagnostic yield and accuracy of sputum smear microscopy
Description
Difference in diagnostic yield and accuracy of a single sputum TB smear between study arms.
This will compare the single induced or expectorated sputum sample collected at study enrollment.
Liquid TB culture will be used as the reference standard for assessment of diagnostic accuracy Fluorescence smear microscopy will be performed on auramine-O stained concentrated samples
Time Frame
Up to 2 months after enrollment
Title
Feasibility of sputum induction in primary care clinics
Description
Feasibility and robustness of performing sputum induction in primary care clinics (measures include - sputum induction failure rates, turn-around-time, user appraisals and evaluation)
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Safety and tolerability of sputum induction performed in primary care clinics
Description
Side-effects of sputum induction procedures Number of induced sputum procedures terminated because of patient side-effects and safety
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Diagnostic yield and accuracy of additional diagnostics including Xpert MTB/RIF assay, MODS and Genotype MTBDRplus
Description
Difference in diagnostic yield and accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF, MODS liquid culture and the Genotype MTBDRplus on a single induced or expectorated sputum sample collected at enrollment.
Liquid TB culture will be used as the reference standard for diagnostic accuracy measures.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Cost-analysis of sputum induction for primary care clinics
Description
Based on diagnostic accuracy measures of different diagnostic tests between the induced sputum and standard care groups, cost-of-diagnosis will be calculated and compared
Time Frame
2 years
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
2x smear negative or sputum scarce TB suspects
Primary care patient (not referred by doctor)
Adult patients (>18 years)
Able to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria:
Not meeting inclusion criteria
<18 years
Unable to provide informed consent
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jonathan G Peter, MBChB
Organizational Affiliation
University of Cape Town
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Cape Town
City
Cape Town
State/Province
Western Cape
ZIP/Postal Code
7945
Country
South Africa
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24429245
Citation
Peter JG, Theron G, Pooran A, Thomas J, Pascoe M, Dheda K. Comparison of two methods for acquisition of sputum samples for diagnosis of suspected tuberculosis in smear-negative or sputum-scarce people: a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Respir Med. 2013 Aug;1(6):471-8. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70120-6. Epub 2013 Jul 19.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Utility of Sputum Induction and Novel Technologies to Improve TB Diagnosis in a High HIV Prevalence Primary Care Setting
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs