search
Back to results

Research of the Key Technology and Standardization of Minimal Invasive Treatment for Hepatolithiasis

Primary Purpose

Biliary Stones

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Laparoscopic operation
Open operation
Sponsored by
Shuguo Zheng, MD
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Biliary Stones focused on measuring Hepatolithiasis, Minimal invasive surgery, Laparoscopic hepatectomy, Choledochoscope

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 70 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Patients with regional stones distributed in a segment, lobe or half liver, combined or not combined with extrahepatic biliary calculi, hepatic parenchymal atrophy or fibrosis in the lesion region
  2. Liver function > Child-pugh level B, no severe biliary cirrhosis, ICG ≤ 15%, the residual liver volume and standard liver volume ratio ≥ 40%
  3. Patients with good general condition, the conditions of open Anatomical Hepatectomy were achieved
  4. Other organ lesions and previous biliary tract operation is not the absolute exclusion criteria
  5. Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Age: older than 70 years old, younger than 18 years old
  2. Patients with bad general condition or important organ lesions, liver resection could not be tolerated
  3. Complicated case needed to get emergency operation
  4. Combined with severe liver atrophy hypertrophy syndrome, hepatic portal transposition or hilar biliary fibrosis / stenosis
  5. Combined with severe biliary cirrhosis and portal hypertension, severe varicose of hepatic portal vein , hepatic insufficiency
  6. Diagnosed with cholangiocellular carcinoma intraoperatively or by postoperative pathology
  7. Contraindication of laparoscopy: Combined with complicated acute cholangitis, repeated biliary tract operation, heavy intra-abdominal adhesion, Trocar can not be placed in. Artificial pneumoperitoneum could not be tolerated

Sites / Locations

  • Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery ,Southwest Hospital ,Third Military Medical University

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Laparoscopic operation

Open operation

Arm Description

Total laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy were performed, combined with cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration when necessary. The intraoperative ultrasound, choledochoscope and hepatic segmental staining were used selectively.

The traditional open regular hepatectomy were performed, combined with cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration when necessary. The intraoperative ultrasound and choledochoscope were used selectively.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of participants with residual stones or cholangitis symptoms
Liver function, recurrence rate, cholangitis symptoms, quality of life and survival time were collected and analysed to evaluate the postoperative curative effect. The follow up interval time: every six months.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of participants with operation complication
Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, volume of blood transfusion, complications and mortality, postoperative liver function, residual stones were collected and analysed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the operation.

Full Information

First Posted
March 21, 2012
Last Updated
October 8, 2012
Sponsor
Shuguo Zheng, MD
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01563510
Brief Title
Research of the Key Technology and Standardization of Minimal Invasive Treatment for Hepatolithiasis
Official Title
Comparison of Laparoscopic Versus Open Operation for Hepatolithiasis
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2012
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
January 2012 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2017 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2017 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Shuguo Zheng, MD

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this research is to investigate the key technology and the related issues of minimal invasive treatment for hepatolithiasis and to build new methods of minimal invasive operation for hepatolithiasis. The validity, feasibility and limitations of the laparoscopic operation were assessed objectively through our clinical prospective study. The technique points, indications and contraindications were summarized to evaluate the status and role of minimal invasive laparoscopic operation in the treatment of hepatolithiasis.
Detailed Description
Background: China is the high incidence area of hepatolithiasis. The development of minimal invasive techniques opened up a new situation for the treatment of hepatolithiasis, but it has not been widely applied. Intervention: Comparison of minimal invasive versus open operation for hepatolithiasis: a prospective randomized study. One hundred patients with early regional hepatolithiasis were selected and divided into laparoscopic operation group and open operation group randomly, each group contains 50 cases. Laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy or open regular hepatectomy were performed respectively, combined with cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration when necessary. The intraoperative ultrasound and choledochoscope were used selectively. Results: Clinical data: previous operation history, operation time, intraoperative blood loss, volume of blood transfusion, complications and mortality, postoperative liver function, residual stones, recurrence rate, long-term curative effect and survival time were collected and analysed. Statistical method: univariate/multivariate analysis, logistic regression analysis, mixed linear regression, Cox survival analysis were used.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Biliary Stones
Keywords
Hepatolithiasis, Minimal invasive surgery, Laparoscopic hepatectomy, Choledochoscope

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
100 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Laparoscopic operation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Total laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy were performed, combined with cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration when necessary. The intraoperative ultrasound, choledochoscope and hepatic segmental staining were used selectively.
Arm Title
Open operation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The traditional open regular hepatectomy were performed, combined with cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration when necessary. The intraoperative ultrasound and choledochoscope were used selectively.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Laparoscopic operation
Other Intervention Name(s)
Laparoscopic hepatectomy for early regional hepatolithiasis
Intervention Description
Fifty patients with early regional hepatolithiasis were selected and divided into laparoscopic hepatectomy group as described in the detailed description. Total laparoscopic anatomical hepatectomy were performed, combined with cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration when necessary. The intraoperative ultrasound, choledochoscope and hepatic segmental staining were used selectively.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Open operation
Other Intervention Name(s)
Open operation for regional hepatolithiasis
Intervention Description
Fifty patients with early regional hepatolithiasis were selected and divided into open group as described in the detailed description. The traditional open regular hepatectomy were performed, combined with cholecystectomy and bile duct exploration when necessary. The intraoperative ultrasound and choledochoscope were used selectively.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of participants with residual stones or cholangitis symptoms
Description
Liver function, recurrence rate, cholangitis symptoms, quality of life and survival time were collected and analysed to evaluate the postoperative curative effect. The follow up interval time: every six months.
Time Frame
up to 5 years postoperation
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of participants with operation complication
Description
Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, volume of blood transfusion, complications and mortality, postoperative liver function, residual stones were collected and analysed to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the operation.
Time Frame
Duration hospitalization(an expected average of 2 weeks) to 2 months postoperation

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with regional stones distributed in a segment, lobe or half liver, combined or not combined with extrahepatic biliary calculi, hepatic parenchymal atrophy or fibrosis in the lesion region Liver function > Child-pugh level B, no severe biliary cirrhosis, ICG ≤ 15%, the residual liver volume and standard liver volume ratio ≥ 40% Patients with good general condition, the conditions of open Anatomical Hepatectomy were achieved Other organ lesions and previous biliary tract operation is not the absolute exclusion criteria Written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Age: older than 70 years old, younger than 18 years old Patients with bad general condition or important organ lesions, liver resection could not be tolerated Complicated case needed to get emergency operation Combined with severe liver atrophy hypertrophy syndrome, hepatic portal transposition or hilar biliary fibrosis / stenosis Combined with severe biliary cirrhosis and portal hypertension, severe varicose of hepatic portal vein , hepatic insufficiency Diagnosed with cholangiocellular carcinoma intraoperatively or by postoperative pathology Contraindication of laparoscopy: Combined with complicated acute cholangitis, repeated biliary tract operation, heavy intra-abdominal adhesion, Trocar can not be placed in. Artificial pneumoperitoneum could not be tolerated
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Shuguo Zheng, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery ,Southwest Hospital ,Third Military Medical University
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Institute of Hepatobiliary Surgery ,Southwest Hospital ,Third Military Medical University
City
Chongqing
State/Province
Chongqing
ZIP/Postal Code
400038
Country
China

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
17468921
Citation
Uchiyama K, Kawai M, Ueno M, Ozawa S, Tani M, Yamaue H. Reducing residual and recurrent stones by hepatectomy for hepatolithiasis. J Gastrointest Surg. 2007 May;11(5):626-30. doi: 10.1007/s11605-006-0024-8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11231390
Citation
Lee SK, Seo DW, Myung SJ, Park ET, Lim BC, Kim HJ, Yoo KS, Park HJ, Joo YH, Kim MH, Min YI. Percutaneous transhepatic cholangioscopic treatment for hepatolithiasis: an evaluation of long-term results and risk factors for recurrence. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001 Mar;53(3):318-23. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(01)70405-1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19249730
Citation
Uenishi T, Hamba H, Takemura S, Oba K, Ogawa M, Yamamoto T, Tanaka S, Kubo S. Outcomes of hepatic resection for hepatolithiasis. Am J Surg. 2009 Aug;198(2):199-202. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2008.08.020. Epub 2009 Feb 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10437840
Citation
Otani K, Shimizu S, Chijiiwa K, Ogawa T, Morisaki T, Sugitani A, Yamaguchi K, Tanaka M. Comparison of treatments for hepatolithiasis: hepatic resection versus cholangioscopic lithotomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1999 Aug;189(2):177-82. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(99)00109-x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19916210
Citation
Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, O'Rourke N, Iannitti D, Dagher I, Koffron AJ, Thomas M, Gayet B, Han HS, Wakabayashi G, Belli G, Kaneko H, Ker CG, Scatton O, Laurent A, Abdalla EK, Chaudhury P, Dutson E, Gamblin C, D'Angelica M, Nagorney D, Testa G, Labow D, Manas D, Poon RT, Nelson H, Martin R, Clary B, Pinson WC, Martinie J, Vauthey JN, Goldstein R, Roayaie S, Barlet D, Espat J, Abecassis M, Rees M, Fong Y, McMasters KM, Broelsch C, Busuttil R, Belghiti J, Strasberg S, Chari RS; World Consensus Conference on Laparoscopic Surgery. The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008. Ann Surg. 2009 Nov;250(5):825-30. doi: 10.1097/sla.0b013e3181b3b2d8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19959158
Citation
Lai EC, Ngai TC, Yang GP, Li MK. Laparoscopic approach of surgical treatment for primary hepatolithiasis: a cohort study. Am J Surg. 2010 May;199(5):716-21. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.02.007. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18528623
Citation
Cho JY, Han HS, Yoon YS, Shin SH. Experiences of laparoscopic liver resection including lesions in the posterosuperior segments of the liver. Surg Endosc. 2008 Nov;22(11):2344-9. doi: 10.1007/s00464-008-9966-0. Epub 2008 Jun 5.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19960572
Citation
Zhang L, Chen YJ, Shang CZ, Zhang HW, Huang ZJ. Total laparoscopic liver resection in 78 patients. World J Gastroenterol. 2009 Dec 7;15(45):5727-31. doi: 10.3748/wjg.15.5727.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19801936
Citation
Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA. World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2,804 patients. Ann Surg. 2009 Nov;250(5):831-41. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b0c4df.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Research of the Key Technology and Standardization of Minimal Invasive Treatment for Hepatolithiasis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs