search
Back to results

Multi-center Study for Stent Graft System for Peripheral Artery (VJH11-01)

Primary Purpose

Peripheral Arterial Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Japan
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
GP1101
Sponsored by
W.L.Gore & Associates
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Peripheral Arterial Disease focused on measuring Symptomatic PAD, Stenosis, Occlusion

Eligibility Criteria

20 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Rutherford 2-5 category
  • Subject has read, understood and signed written informed consent which has been reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB).
  • At least 20 years of age.
  • Ankle-brachial index (ABI) in the study limb in the non-invasive lower extremity arterial studies within 30 days prior to study procedure or at the time of study procedure is less than or equal to 0.9, or toe-brachial index (TBI) is less than or equal to 0.5.
  • Male, infertile female, or female of child-bearing potential practicing an acceptable method of birth control with a negative pregnancy test within 7 days prior to study procedure.
  • Projected life expectancy of greater than 2 years.
  • The ability to comply with the study protocol, follow-up requirements and required testing.
  • Surgical bypass candidate
  • Qualifying lesions by angiography

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Untreated flow-limiting aortoiliac disease.
  • Any previous stenting or surgery in the target vessel(i.e. femoro-popliteal artery).
  • Vascular access/catheterization in the target or contralateral limb within 30 days of study enrollment.
  • Planned surgery or intervention within 30 days after study procedure.
  • Femoral artery or popliteal artery aneurysm > 1.5 X healthy adjacent vessel diameter.
  • Non-atherosclerotic disease resulting in stenosis and/or occlusion (e.g., embolism, Buerger's disease, vasculitis).
  • Severe medical comorbidities (untreated CAD/CHF (Congestive Heart Failure), severe COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), severe dementia, NYHA (New York Heart Association) 3/4, severe hypertension, etc.)
  • Any medical condition that would preclude post-procedural ambulation or completion of study follow-up.
  • Rutherford 5 patients with active infection.
  • Serum creatinine >2.5 mg/dL within 30 days prior to study procedure.
  • Rutherford 6 category in the study or non-study limb or major tissue loss extending above the proximal phalanx level.
  • Rutherford 5 characteristics in non-study limb.
  • Major distal amputation (above the transmetatarsal) in the study or non-study limb.
  • Active infection that could adversely impact patient outcomes in the study, or any patient with septicemia or bacteremia.
  • Any previously known coagulation disorder, including hypercoagulability.
  • Morbid obesity or operative scarring that precludes percutaneous approach
  • Contraindication to anticoagulation or antiplatelet
  • Known allergies to stent/stent-graft components, including heparin sensitivity, allergy, or previous incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) type II.
  • Current peritoneal or hemodialysis
  • Participation in another clinical trial (except F/P device clinical trial) up to 3 months prior to study enrollment.
  • Enrollment in a F/P device clinical trial within the last 12 months.
  • Interventional or surgical treatment on arteries distal to the target vessel for this study within the past 12 months.
  • Any other factor identified by the Principal Investigator

Sites / Locations

  • Nagoya University Hospital
  • Shinshu University Hospital
  • Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital
  • Kokura Memorial Hospital
  • Tokeidai Memorial Hospital
  • Kansai Rousai Hospital
  • Kobe University Hospital
  • Kobe Rosai Hospital
  • Hyogo College of Medicine Hospital
  • National Hospital Organaization Kanazawa Medical Center
  • Sendai Kousei Hospital
  • Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital
  • National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
  • Nara Medical University Hospital
  • Jikei Medical University Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

GP1101

Retrospective Surgical Bypass Outcomes

Arm Description

Prospective data collection: Subjects with occlusive disease of the SFA (Superficial Femoral Artery) implanted with GP1101 covered stent graft

Retrospective data collection (Apr 2012 - Apr 2014) of 68 surgical procedures (performed after Jan 2002) at six Japanese centers used to treat femoral-popliteal artery symptomatic PAD for purposes of establishing the invasiveness control data for hospital stay duration, avoidance of general anesthesia and avoidance of intra-operative transfusion. Eligibility criteria for inclusion werer established to be consistent with the experimental arm.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Assisted Patency
Primary Efficacy Endpoint > > Primary assisted patency at 12 months, defined as hemodynamic evidence by Angiography or ultrasound of flow through a device that had not required a Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) to restore blood flow after total occlusion
Duration of Stay
Duration (in days) of post-procedure hospital stay
Rate of Avoidance of General Anesthesia
Percentage of study subjects avoiding general anesthesia

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants Who Did Not Experience Any Critical Events(Death, Target Vessel Revascularization, Major Amputation of the Target Limb)
Composite endpoint of all subjects experiencing death, target vessel revascularization and/or a major amputation of the target limb (above transmetatarsals) within one month of the index procedure.
Percent of Participants Not Experiencing an Adverse Event
% Avoidance of serious adverse events that are device or procedure-related or for which the relationship is unknown
Percent of Participants Not Experiencing an Adverse Event
% Avoidance of serious adverse events that are device or procedure-related or for which the relationship is unknown at 12 months.
Percent of Participants Not Experiencing an Adverse Event
% Avoidance of serious adverse events that are device or procedure-related or for which the relationship is unknown
Percent of Participants Not Experiencing an Adverse Event
% Avoidance of serious adverse events that are device or procedure-related or for which the relationship is unknown
Percent of Participants Not Experiencing an Adverse Event
% Avoidance of serious adverse events that are device or procedure-related or for which the relationship is unknown
Percent of Participants Not Experiencing an Adverse Event
% Avoidance of serious adverse events that are device or procedure-related or for which the relationship is unknown
Percent of Participants Not Experiencing an Adverse Event
% Avoidance of serious adverse events that are device or procedure-related or for which the relationship is unknown
Rate of Avoidance of Adverse Events
% Avoidance of serious adverse events that are device or procedure-related or for which the relationship is unknown
Technical Success
Placement of GP1101 with residual stenosis of less than 30%
Primary Patency
Hemodynamic blood flow through GP1101 that had not required a target lesion revascularization
Primary Patency
Hemodynamic blood flow through GP1101 that had not required a target lesion revascularization
Primary Patency
Hemodynamic blood flow through GP1101 that had not required a target lesion revascularization
Primary Patency
Hemodynamic blood flow through GP1101 that had not required a target lesion revascularization
Primary Patency
Hemodynamic blood flow through GP1101 that had not required a target lesion revascularization
Secondary Patency
No bypass surgery and no occlusion at the target site
Secondary Patency
No bypass surgery and no occlusion at the target site
Secondary Patency
No bypass surgery and no occlusion at the target site
Secondary Patency
No bypass surgery and no occlusion at the target site
Secondary Patency
No bypass surgery and no occlusion at the target site
Rate of Avoidance of Stent Fracture
X-ray for stent fracture evaluated by Core Lab
Rate of Avoidance of Stent Fracture
X-ray for stent fracture evaluated by Core Lab
Rate of Avoidance of Stent Fracture
X-ray for stent fracture evaluated by Core Lab
Rate of Avoidance of Stent Fracture
X-ray for stent fracture evaluated by Core Lab
Rate of Avoidance of Stent Fracture
X-ray for stent fracture evaluated by Core Lab
Avoidance of Target Lesion Revascularization
Avoidance of Target Lesion Revascularization
Avoidance of Target Lesion Revascularization
Avoidance of Target Lesion Revascularization
Avoidance of Target Lesion Revascularization
Clinical Success
The Rutherford Classification is a system used to score Chronic Limb Ischemia in Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD). The stages follow (higher numbers are worse): Stage 0 - Asymptomatic Stage 1 - Mild claudication Stage 2 - Moderate claudication Stage 3 - Severe claudication Stage 4 - Rest pain Stage 5 - Ischemic ulceration not exceeding ulcer of the digits of the foot Stage 6 - Severe ischemic ulcers or frank gangrene The percentage of people improving by at least one stage (moving frm higher number to lower number) is listed in the results.
Clinical Success
The Rutherford Classification is a system used to score Chronic Limb Ischemia in Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD). The stages follow (higher numbers are worse): Stage 0 - Asymptomatic Stage 1 - Mild claudication Stage 2 - Moderate claudication Stage 3 - Severe claudication Stage 4 - Rest pain Stage 5 - Ischemic ulceration not exceeding ulcer of the digits of the foot Stage 6 - Severe ischemic ulcers or frank gangrene The percentage of people improving by at least one stage (moving frm higher number to lower number) is listed in the results.
Clinical Success
The Rutherford Classification is a system used to score Chronic Limb Ischemia in Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD). The stages follow (higher numbers are worse): Stage 0 - Asymptomatic Stage 1 - Mild claudication Stage 2 - Moderate claudication Stage 3 - Severe claudication Stage 4 - Rest pain Stage 5 - Ischemic ulceration not exceeding ulcer of the digits of the foot Stage 6 - Severe ischemic ulcers or frank gangrene The percentage of people improving by at least one stage (moving frm higher number to lower number) is listed in the results.
Clinical Success
The Rutherford Classification is a system used to score Chronic Limb Ischemia in Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD). The stages follow (higher numbers are worse): Stage 0 - Asymptomatic Stage 1 - Mild claudication Stage 2 - Moderate claudication Stage 3 - Severe claudication Stage 4 - Rest pain Stage 5 - Ischemic ulceration not exceeding ulcer of the digits of the foot Stage 6 - Severe ischemic ulcers or frank gangrene The percentage of people improving by at least one stage (moving frm higher number to lower number) is listed in the results.
Clinical Success
The Rutherford Classification is a system used to score Chronic Limb Ischemia in Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD). The stages follow (higher numbers are worse): Stage 0 - Asymptomatic Stage 1 - Mild claudication Stage 2 - Moderate claudication Stage 3 - Severe claudication Stage 4 - Rest pain Stage 5 - Ischemic ulceration not exceeding ulcer of the digits of the foot Stage 6 - Severe ischemic ulcers or frank gangrene The percentage of people improving by at least one stage (moving frm higher number to lower number) is listed in the results.
Change in Ankle-Brachial Index From Baseline
Ankle-Brachial Index of each time frame (1, 3, 6, 12, 24 months) compared to baseline (pre-procedure),
Change in Ankle-Brachial Index From Baseline
Ankle-Brachial Index of each time frame (1, 3, 6, 12, 24 months) compared to baseline (pre-procedure)
Change in Ankle-Brachial Index From Baseline
Ankle-Brachial Index of each time frame (1, 3, 6, 12, 24 months) compared to baseline (pre-procedure)
Change in Ankle-Brachial Index From Baseline
Ankle-Brachial Index of each time frame (1, 3, 6, 12, 24 months) compared to baseline (pre-procedure)
Change in Ankle-Brachial Index From Baseline
Ankle-Brachial Index of each time frame (1, 3, 6, 12, 24 months) compared to baseline (pre-procedure)
Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire - VascuQOL
VascuQOL Score - Higher score reflects a better quality of life(Score range: 1 to 7). This score is composed of "Activity", "Symptom", "Pain", "Emotional" and "Social" scores as subscales. The total score is calculated as the average value of all scores.
Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire - VascuQOL
VascuQOL Score - Higher score reflects a better quality of life(Score range: 1 to 7). This score is composed of "Activity", "Symptom", "Pain", "Emotional" and "Social" scores as subscales. The total score is calculated as the average value of all scores.
Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire - VascuQOL
VascuQOL Score - Higher score reflects a better quality of life(Score range: 1 to 7). This score is composed of "Activity", "Symptom", "Pain", "Emotional" and "Social" scores as subscales. The total score is calculated as the average value of all scores.
Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire - VascuQOL
VascuQOL Score - Higher score reflects a better quality of life(Score range: 1 to 7). This score is composed of "Activity", "Symptom", "Pain", "Emotional" and "Social" scores as subscales. The total score is calculated as the average value of all scores.
Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire - VascuQOL
VascuQOL Score - Higher score reflects a better quality of life(Score range: 1 to 7). This score is composed of "Activity", "Symptom", "Pain", "Emotional" and "Social" scores as subscales. The total score is calculated as the average value of all scores.
Walking Impairment Questionnaire-WIQ
WIQ Distance Score - Higher score reflects a better quality of life(Scores range: 0 to 100.)The difficulty of walking with each specific distance(from walking indoor to 450 meter) is ranked on 0 to 4 and these rank value are converted to score according to the difficulty of walking. The distance score is determained by dividing the total score by greatest score and multiplying by 100.
Walking Impairment Questionnaire-WIQ
WIQ Distance Score - Higher score reflects a better quality of life(Scores range: 0 to 100.)The difficulty of walking with each specific distance(from walking indoor to 450 meter) is ranked on 0 to 4 and these rank value are converted to score according to the difficulty of walking. The distance score is determained by dividing the total score by greatest score and multiplying by 100.
Walking Impairment Questionnaire-WIQ
WIQ Distance Score - Higher score reflects a better quality of life(Scores range: 0 to 100.)The difficulty of walking with each specific distance(from walking indoor to 450 meter) is ranked on 0 to 4 and these rank value are converted to score according to the difficulty of walking. The distance score is determained by dividing the total score by greatest score and multiplying by 100.
Walking Impairment Questionnaire-WIQ
WIQ Distance Score - Higher score reflects a better quality of life(Scores range: 0 to 100.)The difficulty of walking with each specific distance(from walking indoor to 450 meter) is ranked on 0 to 4 and these rank value are converted to score according to the difficulty of walking. The distance score is determained by dividing the total score by greatest score and multiplying by 100.
Walking Impairment Questionnaire-WIQ
WIQ Distance Score - Higher score reflects a better quality of life(Scores range: 0 to 100.)The difficulty of walking with each specific distance(from walking indoor to 450 meter) is ranked on 0 to 4 and these rank value are converted to score according to the difficulty of walking. The distance score is determained by dividing the total score by greatest score and multiplying by 100.
Rate of Avoidance of Blood Transfusion

Full Information

First Posted
April 9, 2012
Last Updated
May 10, 2023
Sponsor
W.L.Gore & Associates
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01575808
Brief Title
Multi-center Study for Stent Graft System for Peripheral Artery
Acronym
VJH11-01
Official Title
The Utility of GP1101 Relative to Surgical Bypass in the Treatment of Femoral / Popliteal Arterial Symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Disease
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2012 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
August 2014 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
W.L.Gore & Associates

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The utility of GP1101 will be evaluated relative to that of surgical bypass in the treatment of Femoral/Popliteal Arterial Symptomatic Peripheral Arterial Disease. Efficacy will be measured by comparison to a Surgical Bypass Efficacy Goal, and Invasiveness will be measured by comparison to Surgical Bypass data derived from a retrospective study.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Peripheral Arterial Disease
Keywords
Symptomatic PAD, Stenosis, Occlusion

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
133 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
GP1101
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Prospective data collection: Subjects with occlusive disease of the SFA (Superficial Femoral Artery) implanted with GP1101 covered stent graft
Arm Title
Retrospective Surgical Bypass Outcomes
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Retrospective data collection (Apr 2012 - Apr 2014) of 68 surgical procedures (performed after Jan 2002) at six Japanese centers used to treat femoral-popliteal artery symptomatic PAD for purposes of establishing the invasiveness control data for hospital stay duration, avoidance of general anesthesia and avoidance of intra-operative transfusion. Eligibility criteria for inclusion werer established to be consistent with the experimental arm.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
GP1101
Other Intervention Name(s)
Gore VIABAHN Endoprosthesis
Intervention Description
Endovascular stent graft implantation
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Primary Assisted Patency
Description
Primary Efficacy Endpoint > > Primary assisted patency at 12 months, defined as hemodynamic evidence by Angiography or ultrasound of flow through a device that had not required a Target Lesion Revascularization (TLR) to restore blood flow after total occlusion
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Duration of Stay
Description
Duration (in days) of post-procedure hospital stay
Time Frame
Up to discharge
Title
Rate of Avoidance of General Anesthesia
Description
Percentage of study subjects avoiding general anesthesia
Time Frame
Day 0
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants Who Did Not Experience Any Critical Events(Death, Target Vessel Revascularization, Major Amputation of the Target Limb)
Description
Composite endpoint of all subjects experiencing death, target vessel revascularization and/or a major amputation of the target limb (above transmetatarsals) within one month of the index procedure.
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Percent of Participants Not Experiencing an Adverse Event
Description
% Avoidance of serious adverse events that are device or procedure-related or for which the relationship is unknown
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Percent of Participants Not Experiencing an Adverse Event
Description
% Avoidance of serious adverse events that are device or procedure-related or for which the relationship is unknown at 12 months.
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Percent of Participants Not Experiencing an Adverse Event
Description
% Avoidance of serious adverse events that are device or procedure-related or for which the relationship is unknown
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Percent of Participants Not Experiencing an Adverse Event
Description
% Avoidance of serious adverse events that are device or procedure-related or for which the relationship is unknown
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Percent of Participants Not Experiencing an Adverse Event
Description
% Avoidance of serious adverse events that are device or procedure-related or for which the relationship is unknown
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Percent of Participants Not Experiencing an Adverse Event
Description
% Avoidance of serious adverse events that are device or procedure-related or for which the relationship is unknown
Time Frame
36 months
Title
Percent of Participants Not Experiencing an Adverse Event
Description
% Avoidance of serious adverse events that are device or procedure-related or for which the relationship is unknown
Time Frame
48 months
Title
Rate of Avoidance of Adverse Events
Description
% Avoidance of serious adverse events that are device or procedure-related or for which the relationship is unknown
Time Frame
60 months
Title
Technical Success
Description
Placement of GP1101 with residual stenosis of less than 30%
Time Frame
Post-procedure
Title
Primary Patency
Description
Hemodynamic blood flow through GP1101 that had not required a target lesion revascularization
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Primary Patency
Description
Hemodynamic blood flow through GP1101 that had not required a target lesion revascularization
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Primary Patency
Description
Hemodynamic blood flow through GP1101 that had not required a target lesion revascularization
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Primary Patency
Description
Hemodynamic blood flow through GP1101 that had not required a target lesion revascularization
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Primary Patency
Description
Hemodynamic blood flow through GP1101 that had not required a target lesion revascularization
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Secondary Patency
Description
No bypass surgery and no occlusion at the target site
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Secondary Patency
Description
No bypass surgery and no occlusion at the target site
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Secondary Patency
Description
No bypass surgery and no occlusion at the target site
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Secondary Patency
Description
No bypass surgery and no occlusion at the target site
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Secondary Patency
Description
No bypass surgery and no occlusion at the target site
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Rate of Avoidance of Stent Fracture
Description
X-ray for stent fracture evaluated by Core Lab
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Rate of Avoidance of Stent Fracture
Description
X-ray for stent fracture evaluated by Core Lab
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Rate of Avoidance of Stent Fracture
Description
X-ray for stent fracture evaluated by Core Lab
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Rate of Avoidance of Stent Fracture
Description
X-ray for stent fracture evaluated by Core Lab
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Rate of Avoidance of Stent Fracture
Description
X-ray for stent fracture evaluated by Core Lab
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Avoidance of Target Lesion Revascularization
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Avoidance of Target Lesion Revascularization
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Avoidance of Target Lesion Revascularization
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Avoidance of Target Lesion Revascularization
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Avoidance of Target Lesion Revascularization
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Clinical Success
Description
The Rutherford Classification is a system used to score Chronic Limb Ischemia in Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD). The stages follow (higher numbers are worse): Stage 0 - Asymptomatic Stage 1 - Mild claudication Stage 2 - Moderate claudication Stage 3 - Severe claudication Stage 4 - Rest pain Stage 5 - Ischemic ulceration not exceeding ulcer of the digits of the foot Stage 6 - Severe ischemic ulcers or frank gangrene The percentage of people improving by at least one stage (moving frm higher number to lower number) is listed in the results.
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Clinical Success
Description
The Rutherford Classification is a system used to score Chronic Limb Ischemia in Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD). The stages follow (higher numbers are worse): Stage 0 - Asymptomatic Stage 1 - Mild claudication Stage 2 - Moderate claudication Stage 3 - Severe claudication Stage 4 - Rest pain Stage 5 - Ischemic ulceration not exceeding ulcer of the digits of the foot Stage 6 - Severe ischemic ulcers or frank gangrene The percentage of people improving by at least one stage (moving frm higher number to lower number) is listed in the results.
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Clinical Success
Description
The Rutherford Classification is a system used to score Chronic Limb Ischemia in Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD). The stages follow (higher numbers are worse): Stage 0 - Asymptomatic Stage 1 - Mild claudication Stage 2 - Moderate claudication Stage 3 - Severe claudication Stage 4 - Rest pain Stage 5 - Ischemic ulceration not exceeding ulcer of the digits of the foot Stage 6 - Severe ischemic ulcers or frank gangrene The percentage of people improving by at least one stage (moving frm higher number to lower number) is listed in the results.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Clinical Success
Description
The Rutherford Classification is a system used to score Chronic Limb Ischemia in Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD). The stages follow (higher numbers are worse): Stage 0 - Asymptomatic Stage 1 - Mild claudication Stage 2 - Moderate claudication Stage 3 - Severe claudication Stage 4 - Rest pain Stage 5 - Ischemic ulceration not exceeding ulcer of the digits of the foot Stage 6 - Severe ischemic ulcers or frank gangrene The percentage of people improving by at least one stage (moving frm higher number to lower number) is listed in the results.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Clinical Success
Description
The Rutherford Classification is a system used to score Chronic Limb Ischemia in Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD). The stages follow (higher numbers are worse): Stage 0 - Asymptomatic Stage 1 - Mild claudication Stage 2 - Moderate claudication Stage 3 - Severe claudication Stage 4 - Rest pain Stage 5 - Ischemic ulceration not exceeding ulcer of the digits of the foot Stage 6 - Severe ischemic ulcers or frank gangrene The percentage of people improving by at least one stage (moving frm higher number to lower number) is listed in the results.
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Change in Ankle-Brachial Index From Baseline
Description
Ankle-Brachial Index of each time frame (1, 3, 6, 12, 24 months) compared to baseline (pre-procedure),
Time Frame
Baseline and 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 months, change from baseline at 1 month presented
Title
Change in Ankle-Brachial Index From Baseline
Description
Ankle-Brachial Index of each time frame (1, 3, 6, 12, 24 months) compared to baseline (pre-procedure)
Time Frame
Baseline and 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 months, change from baseline at 3 months presented
Title
Change in Ankle-Brachial Index From Baseline
Description
Ankle-Brachial Index of each time frame (1, 3, 6, 12, 24 months) compared to baseline (pre-procedure)
Time Frame
Baseline and 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 months, change from baseline at 6 months presented
Title
Change in Ankle-Brachial Index From Baseline
Description
Ankle-Brachial Index of each time frame (1, 3, 6, 12, 24 months) compared to baseline (pre-procedure)
Time Frame
Baseline and 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 months, change from baseline at 12 months presented
Title
Change in Ankle-Brachial Index From Baseline
Description
Ankle-Brachial Index of each time frame (1, 3, 6, 12, 24 months) compared to baseline (pre-procedure)
Time Frame
Baseline and 1, 3, 6, 12, 24 months, change from baseline at 24 months presented
Title
Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire - VascuQOL
Description
VascuQOL Score - Higher score reflects a better quality of life(Score range: 1 to 7). This score is composed of "Activity", "Symptom", "Pain", "Emotional" and "Social" scores as subscales. The total score is calculated as the average value of all scores.
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire - VascuQOL
Description
VascuQOL Score - Higher score reflects a better quality of life(Score range: 1 to 7). This score is composed of "Activity", "Symptom", "Pain", "Emotional" and "Social" scores as subscales. The total score is calculated as the average value of all scores.
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire - VascuQOL
Description
VascuQOL Score - Higher score reflects a better quality of life(Score range: 1 to 7). This score is composed of "Activity", "Symptom", "Pain", "Emotional" and "Social" scores as subscales. The total score is calculated as the average value of all scores.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire - VascuQOL
Description
VascuQOL Score - Higher score reflects a better quality of life(Score range: 1 to 7). This score is composed of "Activity", "Symptom", "Pain", "Emotional" and "Social" scores as subscales. The total score is calculated as the average value of all scores.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire - VascuQOL
Description
VascuQOL Score - Higher score reflects a better quality of life(Score range: 1 to 7). This score is composed of "Activity", "Symptom", "Pain", "Emotional" and "Social" scores as subscales. The total score is calculated as the average value of all scores.
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Walking Impairment Questionnaire-WIQ
Description
WIQ Distance Score - Higher score reflects a better quality of life(Scores range: 0 to 100.)The difficulty of walking with each specific distance(from walking indoor to 450 meter) is ranked on 0 to 4 and these rank value are converted to score according to the difficulty of walking. The distance score is determained by dividing the total score by greatest score and multiplying by 100.
Time Frame
1 month
Title
Walking Impairment Questionnaire-WIQ
Description
WIQ Distance Score - Higher score reflects a better quality of life(Scores range: 0 to 100.)The difficulty of walking with each specific distance(from walking indoor to 450 meter) is ranked on 0 to 4 and these rank value are converted to score according to the difficulty of walking. The distance score is determained by dividing the total score by greatest score and multiplying by 100.
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Walking Impairment Questionnaire-WIQ
Description
WIQ Distance Score - Higher score reflects a better quality of life(Scores range: 0 to 100.)The difficulty of walking with each specific distance(from walking indoor to 450 meter) is ranked on 0 to 4 and these rank value are converted to score according to the difficulty of walking. The distance score is determained by dividing the total score by greatest score and multiplying by 100.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Walking Impairment Questionnaire-WIQ
Description
WIQ Distance Score - Higher score reflects a better quality of life(Scores range: 0 to 100.)The difficulty of walking with each specific distance(from walking indoor to 450 meter) is ranked on 0 to 4 and these rank value are converted to score according to the difficulty of walking. The distance score is determained by dividing the total score by greatest score and multiplying by 100.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Walking Impairment Questionnaire-WIQ
Description
WIQ Distance Score - Higher score reflects a better quality of life(Scores range: 0 to 100.)The difficulty of walking with each specific distance(from walking indoor to 450 meter) is ranked on 0 to 4 and these rank value are converted to score according to the difficulty of walking. The distance score is determained by dividing the total score by greatest score and multiplying by 100.
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Rate of Avoidance of Blood Transfusion
Time Frame
Post-Procedure

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Rutherford 2-5 category Subject has read, understood and signed written informed consent which has been reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB). At least 20 years of age. Ankle-brachial index (ABI) in the study limb in the non-invasive lower extremity arterial studies within 30 days prior to study procedure or at the time of study procedure is less than or equal to 0.9, or toe-brachial index (TBI) is less than or equal to 0.5. Male, infertile female, or female of child-bearing potential practicing an acceptable method of birth control with a negative pregnancy test within 7 days prior to study procedure. Projected life expectancy of greater than 2 years. The ability to comply with the study protocol, follow-up requirements and required testing. Surgical bypass candidate Qualifying lesions by angiography Exclusion Criteria: Untreated flow-limiting aortoiliac disease. Any previous stenting or surgery in the target vessel(i.e. femoro-popliteal artery). Vascular access/catheterization in the target or contralateral limb within 30 days of study enrollment. Planned surgery or intervention within 30 days after study procedure. Femoral artery or popliteal artery aneurysm > 1.5 X healthy adjacent vessel diameter. Non-atherosclerotic disease resulting in stenosis and/or occlusion (e.g., embolism, Buerger's disease, vasculitis). Severe medical comorbidities (untreated CAD/CHF (Congestive Heart Failure), severe COPD (Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease), severe dementia, NYHA (New York Heart Association) 3/4, severe hypertension, etc.) Any medical condition that would preclude post-procedural ambulation or completion of study follow-up. Rutherford 5 patients with active infection. Serum creatinine >2.5 mg/dL within 30 days prior to study procedure. Rutherford 6 category in the study or non-study limb or major tissue loss extending above the proximal phalanx level. Rutherford 5 characteristics in non-study limb. Major distal amputation (above the transmetatarsal) in the study or non-study limb. Active infection that could adversely impact patient outcomes in the study, or any patient with septicemia or bacteremia. Any previously known coagulation disorder, including hypercoagulability. Morbid obesity or operative scarring that precludes percutaneous approach Contraindication to anticoagulation or antiplatelet Known allergies to stent/stent-graft components, including heparin sensitivity, allergy, or previous incidence of heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) type II. Current peritoneal or hemodialysis Participation in another clinical trial (except F/P device clinical trial) up to 3 months prior to study enrollment. Enrollment in a F/P device clinical trial within the last 12 months. Interventional or surgical treatment on arteries distal to the target vessel for this study within the past 12 months. Any other factor identified by the Principal Investigator
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Takao Ohki, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Jikei Medical University Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Nagoya University Hospital
City
Nagoya
State/Province
Aichi
ZIP/Postal Code
466-8560
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Shinshu University Hospital
City
Nagano
State/Province
Asahi, Matsumoto
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Matsuyama Red Cross Hospital
City
Matsuyama
State/Province
Ehime
ZIP/Postal Code
790-8524
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Kokura Memorial Hospital
City
Kitakyushu
State/Province
Fukuoka
ZIP/Postal Code
802-8555
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Tokeidai Memorial Hospital
City
Sapporo
State/Province
Hokkaido
ZIP/Postal Code
060-0031
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Kansai Rousai Hospital
City
Amagasaki
State/Province
Hyogo
ZIP/Postal Code
660-8511
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Kobe University Hospital
City
Kobe
State/Province
Hyogo
ZIP/Postal Code
650-0017
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Kobe Rosai Hospital
City
Kobe
State/Province
Hyogo
ZIP/Postal Code
651-0053
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Hyogo College of Medicine Hospital
City
Nishinomiya
State/Province
Hyogo
ZIP/Postal Code
663-8501
Country
Japan
Facility Name
National Hospital Organaization Kanazawa Medical Center
City
Kanazawa
State/Province
Ishikawa
ZIP/Postal Code
920-8650
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Sendai Kousei Hospital
City
Sendai
State/Province
Miyagi
ZIP/Postal Code
980-0873
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Kishiwada Tokushukai Hospital
City
Kishiwada
State/Province
Osaka
ZIP/Postal Code
596-8522
Country
Japan
Facility Name
National Cerebral and Cardiovascular Center
City
Suita
State/Province
Osaka
ZIP/Postal Code
565-8565
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Nara Medical University Hospital
City
Nara
ZIP/Postal Code
634-8522
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Jikei Medical University Hospital
City
Tokyo
Country
Japan

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34182032
Citation
Ohki T, Kichikawa K, Yokoi H, Iida O, Yamaoka T, Maeda K, Kanaoka Y. Long-term results of the Japanese multicenter Viabahn trial of heparin bonded endovascular stent grafts for long and complex lesions in the superficial femoral artery. J Vasc Surg. 2021 Dec;74(6):1958-1967.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2021.05.056. Epub 2021 Jun 26.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
28400218
Citation
Ohki T, Kichikawa K, Yokoi H, Uematsu M, Yamaoka T, Maeda K, Kanaoka Y. Outcomes of the Japanese multicenter Viabahn trial of endovascular stent grafting for superficial femoral artery lesions. J Vasc Surg. 2017 Jul;66(1):130-142.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2017.01.065. Epub 2017 Apr 8.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Multi-center Study for Stent Graft System for Peripheral Artery

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs