Number of Participants Who Did Not Experience Any Critical Events(Death, Target Vessel Revascularization, Major Amputation of the Target Limb)
Composite endpoint of all subjects experiencing death, target vessel revascularization and/or a major amputation of the target limb (above transmetatarsals) within one month of the index procedure.
Percent of Participants Not Experiencing an Adverse Event
% Avoidance of serious adverse events that are device or procedure-related or for which the relationship is unknown
Percent of Participants Not Experiencing an Adverse Event
% Avoidance of serious adverse events that are device or procedure-related or for which the relationship is unknown at 12 months.
Percent of Participants Not Experiencing an Adverse Event
% Avoidance of serious adverse events that are device or procedure-related or for which the relationship is unknown
Percent of Participants Not Experiencing an Adverse Event
% Avoidance of serious adverse events that are device or procedure-related or for which the relationship is unknown
Percent of Participants Not Experiencing an Adverse Event
% Avoidance of serious adverse events that are device or procedure-related or for which the relationship is unknown
Percent of Participants Not Experiencing an Adverse Event
% Avoidance of serious adverse events that are device or procedure-related or for which the relationship is unknown
Percent of Participants Not Experiencing an Adverse Event
% Avoidance of serious adverse events that are device or procedure-related or for which the relationship is unknown
Rate of Avoidance of Adverse Events
% Avoidance of serious adverse events that are device or procedure-related or for which the relationship is unknown
Technical Success
Placement of GP1101 with residual stenosis of less than 30%
Primary Patency
Hemodynamic blood flow through GP1101 that had not required a target lesion revascularization
Primary Patency
Hemodynamic blood flow through GP1101 that had not required a target lesion revascularization
Primary Patency
Hemodynamic blood flow through GP1101 that had not required a target lesion revascularization
Primary Patency
Hemodynamic blood flow through GP1101 that had not required a target lesion revascularization
Primary Patency
Hemodynamic blood flow through GP1101 that had not required a target lesion revascularization
Secondary Patency
No bypass surgery and no occlusion at the target site
Secondary Patency
No bypass surgery and no occlusion at the target site
Secondary Patency
No bypass surgery and no occlusion at the target site
Secondary Patency
No bypass surgery and no occlusion at the target site
Secondary Patency
No bypass surgery and no occlusion at the target site
Rate of Avoidance of Stent Fracture
X-ray for stent fracture evaluated by Core Lab
Rate of Avoidance of Stent Fracture
X-ray for stent fracture evaluated by Core Lab
Rate of Avoidance of Stent Fracture
X-ray for stent fracture evaluated by Core Lab
Rate of Avoidance of Stent Fracture
X-ray for stent fracture evaluated by Core Lab
Rate of Avoidance of Stent Fracture
X-ray for stent fracture evaluated by Core Lab
Avoidance of Target Lesion Revascularization
Avoidance of Target Lesion Revascularization
Avoidance of Target Lesion Revascularization
Avoidance of Target Lesion Revascularization
Avoidance of Target Lesion Revascularization
Clinical Success
The Rutherford Classification is a system used to score Chronic Limb Ischemia in Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD). The stages follow (higher numbers are worse):
Stage 0 - Asymptomatic Stage 1 - Mild claudication Stage 2 - Moderate claudication Stage 3 - Severe claudication Stage 4 - Rest pain Stage 5 - Ischemic ulceration not exceeding ulcer of the digits of the foot Stage 6 - Severe ischemic ulcers or frank gangrene
The percentage of people improving by at least one stage (moving frm higher number to lower number) is listed in the results.
Clinical Success
The Rutherford Classification is a system used to score Chronic Limb Ischemia in Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD). The stages follow (higher numbers are worse):
Stage 0 - Asymptomatic Stage 1 - Mild claudication Stage 2 - Moderate claudication Stage 3 - Severe claudication Stage 4 - Rest pain Stage 5 - Ischemic ulceration not exceeding ulcer of the digits of the foot Stage 6 - Severe ischemic ulcers or frank gangrene
The percentage of people improving by at least one stage (moving frm higher number to lower number) is listed in the results.
Clinical Success
The Rutherford Classification is a system used to score Chronic Limb Ischemia in Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD). The stages follow (higher numbers are worse):
Stage 0 - Asymptomatic Stage 1 - Mild claudication Stage 2 - Moderate claudication Stage 3 - Severe claudication Stage 4 - Rest pain Stage 5 - Ischemic ulceration not exceeding ulcer of the digits of the foot Stage 6 - Severe ischemic ulcers or frank gangrene
The percentage of people improving by at least one stage (moving frm higher number to lower number) is listed in the results.
Clinical Success
The Rutherford Classification is a system used to score Chronic Limb Ischemia in Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD). The stages follow (higher numbers are worse):
Stage 0 - Asymptomatic Stage 1 - Mild claudication Stage 2 - Moderate claudication Stage 3 - Severe claudication Stage 4 - Rest pain Stage 5 - Ischemic ulceration not exceeding ulcer of the digits of the foot Stage 6 - Severe ischemic ulcers or frank gangrene
The percentage of people improving by at least one stage (moving frm higher number to lower number) is listed in the results.
Clinical Success
The Rutherford Classification is a system used to score Chronic Limb Ischemia in Peripheral Artery Disease (PAD). The stages follow (higher numbers are worse):
Stage 0 - Asymptomatic Stage 1 - Mild claudication Stage 2 - Moderate claudication Stage 3 - Severe claudication Stage 4 - Rest pain Stage 5 - Ischemic ulceration not exceeding ulcer of the digits of the foot Stage 6 - Severe ischemic ulcers or frank gangrene
The percentage of people improving by at least one stage (moving frm higher number to lower number) is listed in the results.
Change in Ankle-Brachial Index From Baseline
Ankle-Brachial Index of each time frame (1, 3, 6, 12, 24 months) compared to baseline (pre-procedure),
Change in Ankle-Brachial Index From Baseline
Ankle-Brachial Index of each time frame (1, 3, 6, 12, 24 months) compared to baseline (pre-procedure)
Change in Ankle-Brachial Index From Baseline
Ankle-Brachial Index of each time frame (1, 3, 6, 12, 24 months) compared to baseline (pre-procedure)
Change in Ankle-Brachial Index From Baseline
Ankle-Brachial Index of each time frame (1, 3, 6, 12, 24 months) compared to baseline (pre-procedure)
Change in Ankle-Brachial Index From Baseline
Ankle-Brachial Index of each time frame (1, 3, 6, 12, 24 months) compared to baseline (pre-procedure)
Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire - VascuQOL
VascuQOL Score - Higher score reflects a better quality of life(Score range: 1 to 7). This score is composed of "Activity", "Symptom", "Pain", "Emotional" and "Social" scores as subscales. The total score is calculated as the average value of all scores.
Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire - VascuQOL
VascuQOL Score - Higher score reflects a better quality of life(Score range: 1 to 7). This score is composed of "Activity", "Symptom", "Pain", "Emotional" and "Social" scores as subscales. The total score is calculated as the average value of all scores.
Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire - VascuQOL
VascuQOL Score - Higher score reflects a better quality of life(Score range: 1 to 7). This score is composed of "Activity", "Symptom", "Pain", "Emotional" and "Social" scores as subscales. The total score is calculated as the average value of all scores.
Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire - VascuQOL
VascuQOL Score - Higher score reflects a better quality of life(Score range: 1 to 7). This score is composed of "Activity", "Symptom", "Pain", "Emotional" and "Social" scores as subscales. The total score is calculated as the average value of all scores.
Vascular Quality of Life Questionnaire - VascuQOL
VascuQOL Score - Higher score reflects a better quality of life(Score range: 1 to 7). This score is composed of "Activity", "Symptom", "Pain", "Emotional" and "Social" scores as subscales. The total score is calculated as the average value of all scores.
Walking Impairment Questionnaire-WIQ
WIQ Distance Score - Higher score reflects a better quality of life(Scores range: 0 to 100.)The difficulty of walking with each specific distance(from walking indoor to 450 meter) is ranked on 0 to 4 and these rank value are converted to score according to the difficulty of walking. The distance score is determained by dividing the total score by greatest score and multiplying by 100.
Walking Impairment Questionnaire-WIQ
WIQ Distance Score - Higher score reflects a better quality of life(Scores range: 0 to 100.)The difficulty of walking with each specific distance(from walking indoor to 450 meter) is ranked on 0 to 4 and these rank value are converted to score according to the difficulty of walking. The distance score is determained by dividing the total score by greatest score and multiplying by 100.
Walking Impairment Questionnaire-WIQ
WIQ Distance Score - Higher score reflects a better quality of life(Scores range: 0 to 100.)The difficulty of walking with each specific distance(from walking indoor to 450 meter) is ranked on 0 to 4 and these rank value are converted to score according to the difficulty of walking. The distance score is determained by dividing the total score by greatest score and multiplying by 100.
Walking Impairment Questionnaire-WIQ
WIQ Distance Score - Higher score reflects a better quality of life(Scores range: 0 to 100.)The difficulty of walking with each specific distance(from walking indoor to 450 meter) is ranked on 0 to 4 and these rank value are converted to score according to the difficulty of walking. The distance score is determained by dividing the total score by greatest score and multiplying by 100.
Walking Impairment Questionnaire-WIQ
WIQ Distance Score - Higher score reflects a better quality of life(Scores range: 0 to 100.)The difficulty of walking with each specific distance(from walking indoor to 450 meter) is ranked on 0 to 4 and these rank value are converted to score according to the difficulty of walking. The distance score is determained by dividing the total score by greatest score and multiplying by 100.
Rate of Avoidance of Blood Transfusion