search
Back to results

Elders Preferences in Care Decisions (EPIC-D)

Primary Purpose

Early Detection of Cancer, Colon Cancer, Decision Making

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Making A Decision About CRC Screening
Drivers 65 Plus
Sponsored by
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Early Detection of Cancer focused on measuring Colon cancer screening, Decision support interventions, Health status, Patient-centered care, Age, Randomized controlled trial, Double blind, UNC

Eligibility Criteria

70 Years - 84 Years (Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women ages 70 to 84
  • Not up to date with colon cancer screening or surveillance

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Men and women younger than 70 years of age or older than 84
  • History of Colorectal Cancer
  • Inflammatory bowel disease

Sites / Locations

  • Duke Practiced Based Research Network

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Making A Decision About CRC Screening

Drivers 65 Plus

Arm Description

A decision support intervention that is a literacy sensitive paper based tool with educational information targeted to the patient's age and gender.

The placebo comparator is an attention control with information about driving tips for drivers age 65 and older.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Appropriate colorectal cancer screening
The proportion of participants classified as having appropriate colorectal cancer screening in the intervention group compared to the control group. Appropriate screening is a combined outcome measure using patient report of completion or non-completion of CRC screening tests and patient report of discussions about CRC screening with their provider at the index visit. The outcome will be measured six months after the index visit. The index visit is the patient/provider visit that occurred after the decision support intervention or control condition was administered.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Appropriate colorectal cancer screening decisions
The proportion of participants classified as having appropriate colorectal cancer screening decisions in the intervention group will be compared to the control group. Appropriate screening decision making is a combined outcome measure using patient report of intent to complete or not complete CRC screening tests and discussions about CRC screening with their provider. This outcome will be measured immediately after the patient and provider index visit. The index visit is the patient/provider visit that occurred after the decision support intervention or control condition was administered.
Appropriate screening and mediators
For the mediation analysis covariates will be evaluated as potential mediators. The potential mediators to be examined include adequate preparation for individualized decision making (adequate knowledge+ clear values); knowledge scores, screening preference before the index visit, decisional balance, reported discussion during the index visit, gender, previous screening, functional status, and literacy level.
Appropriate screening for health strata
Once we have tested our hypothesis for the main effects, we will also perform hypothesis-generating exploratory analyses to examine effect of the intervention in sub-groups of patients. We will examine the effect in the three strata (best, intermediate, worst health groups) defined by age and Charlson comorbidity score.
Appropriate screening for stool cards
For this analysis, appropriate screening test completion will include stool cards for all age groups and health groups. Analyses described for the primary outcome will be performed using this classification of appropriate screening test completion.

Full Information

First Posted
March 29, 2012
Last Updated
December 16, 2021
Sponsor
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Collaborators
Duke University, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01575990
Brief Title
Elders Preferences in Care Decisions
Acronym
EPIC-D
Official Title
Improving Appropriate Colorectal Cancer Screening in Elderly Patients
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 2012 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
February 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Collaborators
Duke University, Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this research study is to explore ways to improve appropriate colorectal cancer (CRC) screening in the elderly by attempting to target screening in those most likely to benefit and avoiding screening in those least likely to benefit.
Detailed Description
The investigators propose a randomized controlled trial at the patient level to determine the efficacy of a colorectal cancer screening decision support intervention for patients ages 70 to 84 within a clinical setting. The investigators hypothesize that the use of the intervention will prepare patients for individualized decision making with their providers and result in an improvement in appropriate CRC screening decisions and screening outcomes. To assess appropriate CRC screening decisions and screening, the investigators will use a classification scheme derived from the literature based on age and the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Using this scheme, appropriate screening will include screening for those in the best health because they are likely to benefit, no screening for those in the worst health because they are unlikely to benefit, and evidence of a discussion about CRC screening for those in the intermediate health group because the benefit is unclear.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Early Detection of Cancer, Colon Cancer, Decision Making, Patient-Centered Care
Keywords
Colon cancer screening, Decision support interventions, Health status, Patient-centered care, Age, Randomized controlled trial, Double blind, UNC

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
424 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Making A Decision About CRC Screening
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
A decision support intervention that is a literacy sensitive paper based tool with educational information targeted to the patient's age and gender.
Arm Title
Drivers 65 Plus
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
The placebo comparator is an attention control with information about driving tips for drivers age 65 and older.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Making A Decision About CRC Screening
Other Intervention Name(s)
Making A Decision About Colon Cancer Screening Woman 70, Making A Decision About Colon Cancer Screening Woman 75, Making A Decision About Colon Cancer Screening Woman 80, Making A Decision About Colon Cancer Screening Men 70, Making A Decision About Colon Cancer Screening Men 75, Making A Decision About Colon Cancer Screening Men 80
Intervention Description
Targeted by age and gender with 3 components. Educational component Values clarification exercise Individualized decision making worksheet The intervention or control condition is administered before the index visit with the patient's provider.
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Drivers 65 Plus
Other Intervention Name(s)
Attention control, Control condition
Intervention Description
This text booklet is provided as an attention control for those in the control arm and like the intervention is administered prior to the index visit with the patient's provider.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Appropriate colorectal cancer screening
Description
The proportion of participants classified as having appropriate colorectal cancer screening in the intervention group compared to the control group. Appropriate screening is a combined outcome measure using patient report of completion or non-completion of CRC screening tests and patient report of discussions about CRC screening with their provider at the index visit. The outcome will be measured six months after the index visit. The index visit is the patient/provider visit that occurred after the decision support intervention or control condition was administered.
Time Frame
Six months after intervention or control was adminstered
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Appropriate colorectal cancer screening decisions
Description
The proportion of participants classified as having appropriate colorectal cancer screening decisions in the intervention group will be compared to the control group. Appropriate screening decision making is a combined outcome measure using patient report of intent to complete or not complete CRC screening tests and discussions about CRC screening with their provider. This outcome will be measured immediately after the patient and provider index visit. The index visit is the patient/provider visit that occurred after the decision support intervention or control condition was administered.
Time Frame
At baseline (after intervention or control was administered)
Title
Appropriate screening and mediators
Description
For the mediation analysis covariates will be evaluated as potential mediators. The potential mediators to be examined include adequate preparation for individualized decision making (adequate knowledge+ clear values); knowledge scores, screening preference before the index visit, decisional balance, reported discussion during the index visit, gender, previous screening, functional status, and literacy level.
Time Frame
Six months after intervention or control was adminstered
Title
Appropriate screening for health strata
Description
Once we have tested our hypothesis for the main effects, we will also perform hypothesis-generating exploratory analyses to examine effect of the intervention in sub-groups of patients. We will examine the effect in the three strata (best, intermediate, worst health groups) defined by age and Charlson comorbidity score.
Time Frame
Six months after intervention or control was adminstered
Title
Appropriate screening for stool cards
Description
For this analysis, appropriate screening test completion will include stool cards for all age groups and health groups. Analyses described for the primary outcome will be performed using this classification of appropriate screening test completion.
Time Frame
Six months after intervention or control was adminstered

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
84 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Men and women ages 70 to 84 Not up to date with colon cancer screening or surveillance Exclusion Criteria: Men and women younger than 70 years of age or older than 84 History of Colorectal Cancer Inflammatory bowel disease
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Carmen L Lewis, MD, MPH
Organizational Affiliation
University of North Carolina
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Rowena J Dolor, MD, MHS
Organizational Affiliation
Duke University
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Duke Practiced Based Research Network
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27710
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
29847251
Citation
Lewis CL, Kistler CE, Dalton AF, Morris C, Ferrari R, Barclay C, Brewer NT, Dolor R, Harris R, Vu M, Golin CE. A Decision Aid to Promote Appropriate Colorectal Cancer Screening among Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Med Decis Making. 2018 Jul;38(5):614-624. doi: 10.1177/0272989X18773713.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Elders Preferences in Care Decisions

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs