Feasibility Study for Evaluating the Effect of Electrical Stimulation on Lower Esophageal Sphincter Pressure and Esophageal Acid Exposure in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Primary Purpose
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Chile
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
EndoStim LES Stimulation System
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease focused on measuring GERD, LES Pressure, Electrical Stimulation
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subject is between 21 - 65 years of age.
- Subject has a history of heartburn, regurgitation or both for > 6 months prompting physician recommendation of continual daily use of PPI before study entry.
- Baseline GERD-HRQL heartburn score of ≥ 20 off PPI assessed during the run-in phase.
- Subject has an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification I or II (or comparable local classification if any).
- Subject has demonstrated satisfactory symptomatic response to a previous course of GERD therapy (≥ 2 weeks); GERD HRQL heartburn score improvement of ≥ 10 on therapy as assessed during the run in phase.
- Subject has exhibited excessive lower esophageal acid exposure during 24-hour pH-metry off antisecretory therapy performed within 6 months of enrollment; pH < 4 for > 5% of total or > 3% of supine time.
- Subject has a resting LES end expiratory pressure > 5mm Hg and < 15 mm Hg on a high resolution manometry within 6 months of enrollment.
- Subject has esophagitis ≤ Grade C (LA classification) on upper endoscopy within 6 months of enrollment.
- Subject has esophageal body contraction amplitude > 30 mmHg for > 70% of swallows and > 50% peristaltic contractions on high resolution manometry.
- Subject has signed the informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Subject has non-GERD esophageal motility disorders.
- Subject has gastroparesis.
- Subject has significant multisystem diseases.
- Subject has scleroderma requiring therapy in the preceding 2 years .
- Subject has dermatomyositis requiring therapy in the preceding 2 years.
- Subject has Calcinosis-Raynaud's-esophaguschlerodactyly syndrome requiring therapy in the preceding 2 years.
- Subject has Sjogren's Syndrome requiring therapy in the preceding 2 years.
- Subject has Sharp's Syndrome requiring therapy in the preceding 2 years.
- Subject has persistent esophagitis greater than LA grade C.
- Subject has Barrett's epithelium (> M2; >C1) or any dysplasia.
- Subject has a hiatus hernia larger than 3 cm.
- Subject has a body mass Index greater than 35 kg/m2 .
- Subject has Type 1 diabetes mellitus
- Subject has uncontrolled Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) defined as HbA1c >9.5 in the previous 6 months, or has T2DM for > 10 years.
- Subject has an autoimmune disorder requiring therapy in the preceding 2 years.
- Subject has suspected or confirmed esophageal or gastric cancer.
- Subject has esophageal or gastric varices.
- Subject has significant cardiac arrhythmia or ectopy or significant cardiovascular disease.
- Subject has an existing implanted electrical stimulator (e.g., pacemaker).
- Subject requires chronic anticoagulant therapy.
- Subject has dysphagia or esophageal peptic structure, excluding Schatzki's ring.
- Subject is pregnant or intends to become pregnant during the trial period.
- Subject is currently enrolled in other potentially confounding research.
- Subject has any condition that, at the discretion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the trial.
- History of any malignancy in the last 2 years
- History of previous esophageal or gastric surgery, including nissen fundoplication
Sites / Locations
- INDISA Clínica da Familia
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Other
Arm Label
Single Arm open label
Arm Description
EndoStim LES Stimulation System
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Primary Safety Endpoint
Safety will be assessed by incidence and severity of adverse events through 12-week (3 month) follow-up. Included in this assessment will be the proportion of subjects with any of the following outcomes between device implant and completion of the Week 12 evaluation: (1) death, or (2) medical morbidity, including myocardial infarction, pneumonia, wound infection, or perforation requiring hospitalization.
Primary Endpoint: Functionality
Functionality of the EndoStim system will be assessed by the ability of the device to initiate stimulation as programmed and to accurately detect the patient's posture. Indication of device detection when the patient is lying horizontally and when standing up will be recorded.
Secondary Outcome Measures
GERD-HRQL
Improvement in GERD-HRQL with LES stimulation at the 12-weeks (3 months) follow-up compared to baseline
GERD Symptoms
Changes in GERD symptoms as measured by the patient daily symptom-diary as well as the impact of GERD symptoms on quality of life as measured by SF-12 will be compared between baseline assessments and post-implant measures at 12 weeks (3 months).
Lower Esophageal Measures
The baseline LES end expiratory pressure and the on-stimulation LES end expiratory pressure at 3 months
Esophageal Acid Exposure
Total fractional esophageal acid exposure time with pH < 4.0. The data on baseline esophageal acid exposure off-therapy, prior to surgical implant of the stimulator and on-stimulation at 12 weeks (3 months) post-implant
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01578642
Brief Title
Feasibility Study for Evaluating the Effect of Electrical Stimulation on Lower Esophageal Sphincter Pressure and Esophageal Acid Exposure in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Official Title
A Feasibility Study: An Evaluation of the Effect of Long-Term Electrical Stimulation on Lower Esophageal Sphincter (LES) Pressure and Esophageal Acid Exposure in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
January 2013
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2013 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2013 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
EndoStim Inc.
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The EndoStim Stimulation System is an investigational device intended to improve the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) resting tone and restore LES function in individuals suffering with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).
Detailed Description
EndoStim is developing an investigational medical device specifically designed to deliver electrical stimulation to the LES and has completed two clinical feasibility studies using the EndoStim stimulation system in fifteen subjects.
Acute electrical stimulation resulted in significant LES pressure with no adverse effects reported.
Results of these studies are promising and warrant additional clinical study to evaluate the effectiveness of EndoStim stimulation system to treat GERD over time.
In this study, EndoStim proposes using a fully implantable system. Results of this study are expected to provide confirmation of safety of long-term LES stimulation and may provide long term clinical benefit for GERD patients.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
Keywords
GERD, LES Pressure, Electrical Stimulation
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
24 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Single Arm open label
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
EndoStim LES Stimulation System
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
EndoStim LES Stimulation System
Intervention Description
The EndoStim LES Stimulation System comprises three components:
an electrical stimulation lead an implantable pulse generator (IPG) and an external programmer.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Primary Safety Endpoint
Description
Safety will be assessed by incidence and severity of adverse events through 12-week (3 month) follow-up. Included in this assessment will be the proportion of subjects with any of the following outcomes between device implant and completion of the Week 12 evaluation: (1) death, or (2) medical morbidity, including myocardial infarction, pneumonia, wound infection, or perforation requiring hospitalization.
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Primary Endpoint: Functionality
Description
Functionality of the EndoStim system will be assessed by the ability of the device to initiate stimulation as programmed and to accurately detect the patient's posture. Indication of device detection when the patient is lying horizontally and when standing up will be recorded.
Time Frame
Up to 3 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
GERD-HRQL
Description
Improvement in GERD-HRQL with LES stimulation at the 12-weeks (3 months) follow-up compared to baseline
Time Frame
3 months
Title
GERD Symptoms
Description
Changes in GERD symptoms as measured by the patient daily symptom-diary as well as the impact of GERD symptoms on quality of life as measured by SF-12 will be compared between baseline assessments and post-implant measures at 12 weeks (3 months).
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Lower Esophageal Measures
Description
The baseline LES end expiratory pressure and the on-stimulation LES end expiratory pressure at 3 months
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Esophageal Acid Exposure
Description
Total fractional esophageal acid exposure time with pH < 4.0. The data on baseline esophageal acid exposure off-therapy, prior to surgical implant of the stimulator and on-stimulation at 12 weeks (3 months) post-implant
Time Frame
3 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Subject is between 21 - 65 years of age.
Subject has a history of heartburn, regurgitation or both for > 6 months prompting physician recommendation of continual daily use of PPI before study entry.
Baseline GERD-HRQL heartburn score of ≥ 20 off PPI assessed during the run-in phase.
Subject has an American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) Physical Status Classification I or II (or comparable local classification if any).
Subject has demonstrated satisfactory symptomatic response to a previous course of GERD therapy (≥ 2 weeks); GERD HRQL heartburn score improvement of ≥ 10 on therapy as assessed during the run in phase.
Subject has exhibited excessive lower esophageal acid exposure during 24-hour pH-metry off antisecretory therapy performed within 6 months of enrollment; pH < 4 for > 5% of total or > 3% of supine time.
Subject has a resting LES end expiratory pressure > 5mm Hg and < 15 mm Hg on a high resolution manometry within 6 months of enrollment.
Subject has esophagitis ≤ Grade C (LA classification) on upper endoscopy within 6 months of enrollment.
Subject has esophageal body contraction amplitude > 30 mmHg for > 70% of swallows and > 50% peristaltic contractions on high resolution manometry.
Subject has signed the informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria:
Subject has non-GERD esophageal motility disorders.
Subject has gastroparesis.
Subject has significant multisystem diseases.
Subject has scleroderma requiring therapy in the preceding 2 years .
Subject has dermatomyositis requiring therapy in the preceding 2 years.
Subject has Calcinosis-Raynaud's-esophaguschlerodactyly syndrome requiring therapy in the preceding 2 years.
Subject has Sjogren's Syndrome requiring therapy in the preceding 2 years.
Subject has Sharp's Syndrome requiring therapy in the preceding 2 years.
Subject has persistent esophagitis greater than LA grade C.
Subject has Barrett's epithelium (> M2; >C1) or any dysplasia.
Subject has a hiatus hernia larger than 3 cm.
Subject has a body mass Index greater than 35 kg/m2 .
Subject has Type 1 diabetes mellitus
Subject has uncontrolled Type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) defined as HbA1c >9.5 in the previous 6 months, or has T2DM for > 10 years.
Subject has an autoimmune disorder requiring therapy in the preceding 2 years.
Subject has suspected or confirmed esophageal or gastric cancer.
Subject has esophageal or gastric varices.
Subject has significant cardiac arrhythmia or ectopy or significant cardiovascular disease.
Subject has an existing implanted electrical stimulator (e.g., pacemaker).
Subject requires chronic anticoagulant therapy.
Subject has dysphagia or esophageal peptic structure, excluding Schatzki's ring.
Subject is pregnant or intends to become pregnant during the trial period.
Subject is currently enrolled in other potentially confounding research.
Subject has any condition that, at the discretion of the investigator, would preclude participation in the trial.
History of any malignancy in the last 2 years
History of previous esophageal or gastric surgery, including nissen fundoplication
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Leonardo RODRIGUEZ, M.D
Organizational Affiliation
INDISA Clínica da Familia, Santiago, Chile
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
INDISA Clínica da Familia
City
Santiago
Country
Chile
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25726315
Citation
Rodriguez L, Rodriguez P, Gomez B, Ayala JC, Oxenberg D, Perez-Castilla A, Netto MG, Soffer E, Boscardin WJ, Crowell MD. Two-year results of intermittent electrical stimulation of the lower esophageal sphincter treatment of gastroesophageal reflux disease. Surgery. 2015 Mar;157(3):556-67. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.10.012. Epub 2014 Nov 6.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Feasibility Study for Evaluating the Effect of Electrical Stimulation on Lower Esophageal Sphincter Pressure and Esophageal Acid Exposure in Patients With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs