Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Three-port and Single-port TEP Repair in Adults
Primary Purpose
Inguinal Hernia
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Taiwan
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair (single port vs. multiport)
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Inguinal Hernia focused on measuring inguinal hernia, laparoscopy, laparoendoscopic single-site surgery
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- primary or recurrent inguinal hernia
Exclusion Criteria:
- previous major lower abdominal surgery, patient refusal of randomization, or unable to accept general anesthesia
Sites / Locations
- Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Taipei branchRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Multiport TEP
LESS TEP
Arm Description
Adult inguinal hernia patients who randomized to receive multiport endoscopic TEP repair
Adult inguinal hernia patients who randomized to receive laparoendoscopic single-site TEP repair
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Visual analogue pain score
The pain score was recorded by a blinded observer at the time points of 2 hours post-op, 24 hours post-op and 7 days post-op with a Visual analoge pain scale (0-10 scale)
Secondary Outcome Measures
modified Medical Outcome Study (MOS)
The post-op convalescence was evaluated by a Modified medical outcome study with item 3-12. The time points being evaluated are at 1 day after operation, 7 days after operation and 6 months after operation.
systemic stress response to surgery
Compare the surgery induced inflammatory responses after LESS TEP and conventional multiport TEP hernia repair with inflammatory markers (IL-6, CRP and neutrophil counts) by blood sampling before and after operation
Testicular volume
Compare the surgery induced testicle changes in male adults after LESS TEP and conventional multiport TEP hernia repair with color Doppler ultrasonography to determine testicular volume and resistive index (RI) before surgery and 3 months postoperatively.
intervention related complication
wound infection, ecchymosis of skin, bleeding complication, seroma formation, chronic wound pain..etc.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01591395
First Posted
May 2, 2012
Last Updated
May 4, 2012
Sponsor
Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01591395
Brief Title
Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Three-port and Single-port TEP Repair in Adults
Official Title
Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing the Short-term and Long-term Outcomes of Three-port and Single-port TEP Repair in Adults
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
May 2012
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
August 2010 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2012 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
undefined (undefined)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Taipei Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Inguinal hernia is one of the most common surgical diseases. Over the past years, the safety and feasibility of laparoscopy was established and gaining popularity in recent few years. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair was associated with less post operative pain, a shorter recovery period, earlier return to normal daily activities and work, and better cosmetic results. The laparoscopic hernia repair usually require three working ports ranging from 5 to 10 mm. However, with each increasing laparoscopic ports usually associated with possible increasing morbidity and pain related to ports.
Efforts are continuing to further reduce the port related morbidities and improve the cosmetic outcomes of laparoscopic surgery, including reduction of the size and number of ports. This has led to the evolution of a novel surgical approach now collectively known as laparoendoscopic single site surgery. LESS has been performed for variable indications including extirpative and reconstructive urologic procedure via the transperitoneal approach. Early experience has demonstrated the feasibility as well as the safe and successful completion of these LESS procedures. Although these initial reports are promising, the clinical advantages of LESS procedures over conventional laparoscopic procedures have not been defined. Therefore, we conducted a single center, randomized trial to compare the safety and other outcomes after conventional laparoscopic and LESS inguinal hernia repair in adult patients.
Detailed Description
Inguinal hernia is one of the most common surgical diseases in adult. Tension free hernioplasty is regarded as gold standard of treatment in adult inguinal hernia. The reported incidence of hernia recurrence after tension free repair is less than 5 percent. Over the past years, the safety and feasibility of laparoscopy was established and gaining popularity in recent few years. With the advancing technology, laparoscopic approach has become the standard treatment for cholecystectomy and adrenalectomy. Laparoscopic procedures improved surgical precision through enhanced visualization, magnification and limited exposure, dissection. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair was associated with less postoperative pain, a shorter recovery period, earlier return to normal daily activities and work, and better cosmetic results. The laparoscopic hernia repair usually require three working ports ranging from 5 to 10 mm. However, with each increasing laparoscopic ports usually associated with possible increasing morbidity and pain related to ports.
Efforts are continuing to further reduce the port related morbidities and improve the cosmetic outcomes of laparoscopic surgery, including reduction of the size and number of ports. This has led to the evolution of a novel surgical approach now collectively known as laparoendoscopic single-site surgery. LESS has been performed for variable indications including extirpative and reconstructive urologic procedure via the transperitoneal approach. Early experience has demonstrated the feasibility as well as the safe and successful completion of these LESS procedures. Although these initial reports are promising, the clinical advantages of LESS procedures over conventional laparoscopic procedures have not been defined.
To date, LESS hernia repair had been rarely reported in the literature except in some case reports and one small series. Although these initial reports revealed that LESS hernia repair is safe and feasible in adult inguinal hernia, the definite clinical benefits of LESS hernia repair could not be identified in these small and short term reports. Thus, a prospective randomized trial comparing LESS and conventional multiport laparoscopic hernia repair with long-term follow up was mandatory to define the clinical advantages of LESS hernia repair. Therefore, we conducted a randomized trial to compare LESS total extraperitoneal hernia repair and conventional multiport TEP repair in adult inguinal hernia with inflammatory, gonadal responses, complication rate and recurrence rate and pain score, functional status and activity level.
Overall Goal
-To compare the surgical outcomes, patient center outcomes and surgery induced inflammatory , gonadal responses after LESS TEP and conventional multiport TEP hernia repair in adult.
Specific Aims
Compare the surgery induced inflammatory responses after LESS TEP and conventional multiport TEP hernia repair with inflammatory markers by blood sampling before and after operation.
Compare the surgery induced testicle changes in male adults after LESS TEP and conventional multiport TEP hernia repair with color Doppler ultrasonography to determine testicular volume and resistive index before surgery and 3 months postoperatively.
Compare the postoperative pain score after LESS TEP and conventional multiport TEP hernia repair with Visual analog pain score.
Compare the postoperative activity level after LESS TEP and conventional multiport TEP hernia repair with modified Medical Outcome Study.
Compare the clinical results and complication rates after LESS TEP and conventional multiport TEP hernia repair by clinic follow up.
Compare the longterm functional outcomes 6 months after LESS TEP and conventional multiport TEP hernia repair with follow up questionnaire.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Inguinal Hernia
Keywords
inguinal hernia, laparoscopy, laparoendoscopic single-site surgery
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
100 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Multiport TEP
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Adult inguinal hernia patients who randomized to receive multiport endoscopic TEP repair
Arm Title
LESS TEP
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Adult inguinal hernia patients who randomized to receive laparoendoscopic single-site TEP repair
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
laparoscopic total extraperitoneal hernia repair (single port vs. multiport)
Intervention Description
comparison of single port laparoscopic TEP and multiport laparoscopic TEP repair for adult inguinal hernia
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Visual analogue pain score
Description
The pain score was recorded by a blinded observer at the time points of 2 hours post-op, 24 hours post-op and 7 days post-op with a Visual analoge pain scale (0-10 scale)
Time Frame
7 days post-operatively
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
modified Medical Outcome Study (MOS)
Description
The post-op convalescence was evaluated by a Modified medical outcome study with item 3-12. The time points being evaluated are at 1 day after operation, 7 days after operation and 6 months after operation.
Time Frame
Post -op 6 months
Title
systemic stress response to surgery
Description
Compare the surgery induced inflammatory responses after LESS TEP and conventional multiport TEP hernia repair with inflammatory markers (IL-6, CRP and neutrophil counts) by blood sampling before and after operation
Time Frame
post-operative 1 day
Title
Testicular volume
Description
Compare the surgery induced testicle changes in male adults after LESS TEP and conventional multiport TEP hernia repair with color Doppler ultrasonography to determine testicular volume and resistive index (RI) before surgery and 3 months postoperatively.
Time Frame
3 months post-operatively
Title
intervention related complication
Description
wound infection, ecchymosis of skin, bleeding complication, seroma formation, chronic wound pain..etc.
Time Frame
6 months post-operatively
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
85 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
primary or recurrent inguinal hernia
Exclusion Criteria:
previous major lower abdominal surgery, patient refusal of randomization, or unable to accept general anesthesia
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Yao-Chou Tsai
Phone
+886-2-66289779
Ext
5712
Email
tsai1970523@yahoo.com.tw
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yao-Chou Tsai
Organizational Affiliation
289 Jianguo Road, Xindian city, Taipei, Taiwan
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Buddhist Tzu Chi General Hospital, Taipei branch
City
Taipei
ZIP/Postal Code
231
Country
Taiwan
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yao-Chou Tsai
Phone
+886-2-66289779
Ext
5712
Email
tsai1970523@yahoo.com.tw
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Yao-Chou Tsai
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Three-port and Single-port TEP Repair in Adults
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs