search
Back to results

Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab With or Without Laser in Comparison to Laser in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion (BRIGHTER)

Primary Purpose

Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Ranibizumab
Laser
Sponsored by
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion focused on measuring Macular Edema, Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion, visual impairment

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Written informed consent must be obtained before any study assessment is performed
  • Diagnosis of visual impairment exclusively due to ME secondary to BRVO
  • BCVA score at Screening and Baseline between 73 and 19 letters (ETDRS)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women
  • Stroke or myocardial infarction less than 3 months before Screening
  • Uncontrolled blood pressure defined as systolic value of >160 mm Hg or diastolic value of >100 mm Hg at Screening or Baseline.
  • Any active periocular or ocular infection or inflammation at Screening or Baseline in either eye
  • Uncontrolled glaucoma at Screening or Baseline or diagnosed within 6 months before Baseline in either eye
  • Neovascularization of the iris or neovascular glaucoma in the study eye
  • Use of any systemic antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drugs within 6 months before Baseline
  • Panretinal laser photocoagulation within 3 months before Baseline or anticipated or scheduled within the next 3 months following Baseline in the study eye
  • Focal or grid laser photocoagulation within 4 months before Baseline in the study eye
  • Use of intra- or periocular corticosteroids (including sub-Tenon) within 3 months before Screening in the study eye
  • Any use of intraocular corticosteroid implants (eg, dexamethasone [Ozurdex®], fluocinolone acetonide [Iluvien®]) in the study eye

Sites / Locations

  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site
  • Novartis Investigative Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

1-ranibizumab monotherapy

2-ranibizumab with laser

3-laser monotherapy

Arm Description

Ranibizumab 0.5 mg

Ranibizumab 0.5 mg + laser

Laser monotherapy with Ranibizumab 0.5 mg from Month 6

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Mean Change in Visual Acuity: BCVA Change at Month 6 Compared to Baseline in Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion (BRVO)
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) -like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of ETDRS is 0 to 100 letters. For the mean change of best corrected visual acuity at Month 6 compare to Baseline, the 95% confidence interval and P value (related to the null hypothesis that this mean change is equal to zero) based on a t distribution/t test were calculated and assessed by an ANOVA model.

Secondary Outcome Measures

The Mean Average Change in Visual Acuity From Month 1 Through Month 24 Compared to Baseline
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of ETDRS is 0 to 100 letters. (A positive average change from baseline of BCVA indicates improvement): Mean Average Change: for each patient, first average change is calculated as the average of the changes from baseline to Month 1 over Month 24. Then, mean average change is calculated as the average of average changes across all patients.
Number of Ranibizumab Treatments From Day 1 to Month 23 by Treatment Group
Number of injections provided to the patients during the 23 month period and conducted within FAS with LOCF and observed data.
Mean Average Change in Visual Acuity (BCVA Letters) From Month 1 Through Month 6
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) -like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of ETDRS is 0 to 100 letters.(A positive average change from baseline of BCVA indicates improvement): Mean Average Change: for each patient, first average change is calculated as the average of the changes from baseline to Month 1 over Month 6. Then, mean average change is calculated as the average of average changes across all patients.
The Mean Change in Visual Acuity BCVA (Letters) From Baseline at Month 12 and Month 24
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) -like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of ETDRS is 0 to 100 letters. For the mean change of best corrected visual acuity at Month 12 and Month 24 compare to Baseline, the 95% confidence interval and P value (related to the null hypothesis that this mean change is equal to zero) based on a t distribution/t test were calculated and were assessed by an ANOVA model.
The Percent of Patients With a Visual Acuity Gain of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline up to Month 6 and Month 24, by Visit
BCVA score was based on the number of letters read correctly on the Early Treatment Diabetic retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity chart assessed at a starting distance of 4 meters. An increased score indicates improvement in acuity. This outcome assessed the number of participants who had improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 letters of visual acuity at Month 6 & Month 24 as compared with baseline, was assessed by an ANOVA model. Endpoints related to the proportion of patients with BCVA letter gain or loss from Baseline was analyzed via stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test with stratification based on baseline BCVA (baseline BCVA less than or equal to 39, 40 to 59, greater than or equal to 60 letters, treatment groups).
Number of Patients With a BCVA Improvement vs Baseline or Achieving Greater Than or Equal to 73 Letters at Month 6 in the Study Eye
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like chart at baseline and Month 6 while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of EDTRS is 0 to 100 letters. BCVA above 73 letters at Month 6 indicates a positive outcome.
Number of Patients With a BCVA Improvement vs Baseline or Achieved Greater Than or Equal to 73 Letters at Month 24 in the Study Eye
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like chart at baseline and Month 12 while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of EDTRS is 0 to 100 letters. BCVA above 73 letters at Month 24 indicates a positive outcome.
The Mean Change in Central Reading Center-assessed Central Subfield Thickness From Month 12 and Month 24 vs. Baseline by Treatment Arm
Retinal thickness was measured using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). The images were reviewed by a central reading center to ensure a standardized evaluation. Stratification was done based on categories of baseline best corrected visual acuity & analysis was based on analysis of variance (ANOVA)
The Mean Change in Patient Reported Outcomes in NEI-VFQ-25 Score (Composite Score and Subscales) at Month 6 and Month 24 Compared to Baseline
The survey consists of 25 items representing 11 vision related constructs (general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, social functioning, mental health, role difficulties, dependency, driving, color vision, peripheral vision) plus a single-item general health rating question. All items are scored so that a high score represents better functioning. Each item is then converted to a 0 to 100 scale so that the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. In this format scores represent the achieved percentage of the total possible score, e.g. a score of 50 represents 50% of the highest possible score.
BCVA (Letters) Mean Average Change From First Ranibizumab Treatment to Month 24 in the Study Eye for Patients Randomized to the Laser Monotherapy Arm
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) -like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of ETDRS is 0 to 100 letters. For the mean change of best corrected visual acuity at Month 24 compare to Baseline, the 95% confidence interval and P value (related to the null hypothesis that this mean change is equal to zero) based on a t distribution/t test were calculated and assessed by an ANOVA model.

Full Information

First Posted
May 2, 2012
Last Updated
September 21, 2016
Sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01599650
Brief Title
Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab With or Without Laser in Comparison to Laser in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
Acronym
BRIGHTER
Official Title
A 24-month, Phase IIIb, Open-label, Randomized, Active Controlled, 3-arm, Multicenter Study Assessing the Efficacy and Safety of an Individualized, Stabilization-criteria-driven PRN Dosing Regimen With 0.5-mg Ranibizumab Intravitreal Injections Applied as Monotherapy or With Adjunctive Laser Photocoagulation in Comparison to Laser Photocoagulation in Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Macular Edema Secondary to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 2012 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2015 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Novartis Pharmaceuticals

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This study will generate comparative data for 0.5-mg ranibizumab using PRN dosing administered with or without adjunctive laser treatment versus laser photocoagulation (the current standard of care) up to Month 6 in patients with visual impairment due to ME secondary to BRVO. Additionally the results of this study will provide long-term (24-month) safety and efficacy data for ranibizumab, administered with or without adjunctive laser treatment in this indication.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion
Keywords
Macular Edema, Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion, visual impairment

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
455 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
1-ranibizumab monotherapy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg
Arm Title
2-ranibizumab with laser
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Ranibizumab 0.5 mg + laser
Arm Title
3-laser monotherapy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Laser monotherapy with Ranibizumab 0.5 mg from Month 6
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ranibizumab
Other Intervention Name(s)
Lucentis
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Laser
Intervention Description
laser photocoagulation
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mean Change in Visual Acuity: BCVA Change at Month 6 Compared to Baseline in Patients With Visual Impairment Due to Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion (BRVO)
Description
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) -like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of ETDRS is 0 to 100 letters. For the mean change of best corrected visual acuity at Month 6 compare to Baseline, the 95% confidence interval and P value (related to the null hypothesis that this mean change is equal to zero) based on a t distribution/t test were calculated and assessed by an ANOVA model.
Time Frame
Baseline, 6 Months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The Mean Average Change in Visual Acuity From Month 1 Through Month 24 Compared to Baseline
Description
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of ETDRS is 0 to 100 letters. (A positive average change from baseline of BCVA indicates improvement): Mean Average Change: for each patient, first average change is calculated as the average of the changes from baseline to Month 1 over Month 24. Then, mean average change is calculated as the average of average changes across all patients.
Time Frame
Baseline, 24 Months
Title
Number of Ranibizumab Treatments From Day 1 to Month 23 by Treatment Group
Description
Number of injections provided to the patients during the 23 month period and conducted within FAS with LOCF and observed data.
Time Frame
Day 1 through Month 23
Title
Mean Average Change in Visual Acuity (BCVA Letters) From Month 1 Through Month 6
Description
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) -like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of ETDRS is 0 to 100 letters.(A positive average change from baseline of BCVA indicates improvement): Mean Average Change: for each patient, first average change is calculated as the average of the changes from baseline to Month 1 over Month 6. Then, mean average change is calculated as the average of average changes across all patients.
Time Frame
From Baseline through Month 6
Title
The Mean Change in Visual Acuity BCVA (Letters) From Baseline at Month 12 and Month 24
Description
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) -like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of ETDRS is 0 to 100 letters. For the mean change of best corrected visual acuity at Month 12 and Month 24 compare to Baseline, the 95% confidence interval and P value (related to the null hypothesis that this mean change is equal to zero) based on a t distribution/t test were calculated and were assessed by an ANOVA model.
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 12 and Month 24
Title
The Percent of Patients With a Visual Acuity Gain of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 Letters From Baseline up to Month 6 and Month 24, by Visit
Description
BCVA score was based on the number of letters read correctly on the Early Treatment Diabetic retinopathy Study (ETDRS) visual acuity chart assessed at a starting distance of 4 meters. An increased score indicates improvement in acuity. This outcome assessed the number of participants who had improvement of ≥1, ≥5, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥30 letters of visual acuity at Month 6 & Month 24 as compared with baseline, was assessed by an ANOVA model. Endpoints related to the proportion of patients with BCVA letter gain or loss from Baseline was analyzed via stratified Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel test with stratification based on baseline BCVA (baseline BCVA less than or equal to 39, 40 to 59, greater than or equal to 60 letters, treatment groups).
Time Frame
Baseline, Month 6 and Month 24
Title
Number of Patients With a BCVA Improvement vs Baseline or Achieving Greater Than or Equal to 73 Letters at Month 6 in the Study Eye
Description
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like chart at baseline and Month 6 while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of EDTRS is 0 to 100 letters. BCVA above 73 letters at Month 6 indicates a positive outcome.
Time Frame
Month 6
Title
Number of Patients With a BCVA Improvement vs Baseline or Achieved Greater Than or Equal to 73 Letters at Month 24 in the Study Eye
Description
Best Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS)-like chart at baseline and Month 12 while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of EDTRS is 0 to 100 letters. BCVA above 73 letters at Month 24 indicates a positive outcome.
Time Frame
Month 24
Title
The Mean Change in Central Reading Center-assessed Central Subfield Thickness From Month 12 and Month 24 vs. Baseline by Treatment Arm
Description
Retinal thickness was measured using Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT). The images were reviewed by a central reading center to ensure a standardized evaluation. Stratification was done based on categories of baseline best corrected visual acuity & analysis was based on analysis of variance (ANOVA)
Time Frame
Month 12 and Month 24
Title
The Mean Change in Patient Reported Outcomes in NEI-VFQ-25 Score (Composite Score and Subscales) at Month 6 and Month 24 Compared to Baseline
Description
The survey consists of 25 items representing 11 vision related constructs (general vision, ocular pain, near activities, distance activities, social functioning, mental health, role difficulties, dependency, driving, color vision, peripheral vision) plus a single-item general health rating question. All items are scored so that a high score represents better functioning. Each item is then converted to a 0 to 100 scale so that the lowest and highest possible scores are set at 0 and 100 points, respectively. In this format scores represent the achieved percentage of the total possible score, e.g. a score of 50 represents 50% of the highest possible score.
Time Frame
Months 6 and 24
Title
BCVA (Letters) Mean Average Change From First Ranibizumab Treatment to Month 24 in the Study Eye for Patients Randomized to the Laser Monotherapy Arm
Description
Best-Corrected Visual Acuity (BCVA) letters was measured using Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study (ETDRS) -like chart while participants were in a sitting position at a testing distance of 4 meters. The range of ETDRS is 0 to 100 letters. For the mean change of best corrected visual acuity at Month 24 compare to Baseline, the 95% confidence interval and P value (related to the null hypothesis that this mean change is equal to zero) based on a t distribution/t test were calculated and assessed by an ANOVA model.
Time Frame
Month 24

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Written informed consent must be obtained before any study assessment is performed Diagnosis of visual impairment exclusively due to ME secondary to BRVO BCVA score at Screening and Baseline between 73 and 19 letters (ETDRS) Exclusion Criteria: Pregnant or nursing (lactating) women Stroke or myocardial infarction less than 3 months before Screening Uncontrolled blood pressure defined as systolic value of >160 mm Hg or diastolic value of >100 mm Hg at Screening or Baseline. Any active periocular or ocular infection or inflammation at Screening or Baseline in either eye Uncontrolled glaucoma at Screening or Baseline or diagnosed within 6 months before Baseline in either eye Neovascularization of the iris or neovascular glaucoma in the study eye Use of any systemic antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drugs within 6 months before Baseline Panretinal laser photocoagulation within 3 months before Baseline or anticipated or scheduled within the next 3 months following Baseline in the study eye Focal or grid laser photocoagulation within 4 months before Baseline in the study eye Use of intra- or periocular corticosteroids (including sub-Tenon) within 3 months before Screening in the study eye Any use of intraocular corticosteroid implants (eg, dexamethasone [Ozurdex®], fluocinolone acetonide [Iluvien®]) in the study eye
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Organizational Affiliation
Novartis Pharmaceuticals
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Parramatta
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2150
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Sydney
State/Province
New South Wales
ZIP/Postal Code
2000
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Melbourne
State/Province
Victoria
ZIP/Postal Code
3002
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Nedlands
State/Province
Western Australia
ZIP/Postal Code
6009
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Calgary
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T2H0C8
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Vancouver
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V5Z 1M9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Victoria
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V8V 4X3
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Halifax
State/Province
Nova Scotia
ZIP/Postal Code
B3H 2Y9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
London
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
N6A 4G5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Boisbriand
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
J7H 1S6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H1T 2M4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Olomouc
ZIP/Postal Code
775 20
Country
Czech Republic
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Praha 10
ZIP/Postal Code
100 34
Country
Czech Republic
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Glostrup
ZIP/Postal Code
DK-2600
Country
Denmark
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Dijon
ZIP/Postal Code
21033
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Lyon
ZIP/Postal Code
69003
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Nice
ZIP/Postal Code
06000
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Paris cedex 10
ZIP/Postal Code
75010
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Paris Cedex 19
ZIP/Postal Code
75940
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Paris
Country
France
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Athens
State/Province
GR
ZIP/Postal Code
124 62
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Heraklion Crete
State/Province
GR
ZIP/Postal Code
711 10
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Larissa
State/Province
GR
ZIP/Postal Code
411 10
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Thessaloniki
State/Province
GR
ZIP/Postal Code
546 29
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Patras
ZIP/Postal Code
26504
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Thessaloniki
ZIP/Postal Code
GR 54636
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
1133
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Budapest
ZIP/Postal Code
H-1083
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Debrecen
ZIP/Postal Code
4032
Country
Hungary
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Dublin 7
Country
Ireland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Dublin
Country
Ireland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bologna
State/Province
BO
ZIP/Postal Code
40138
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Firenze
State/Province
FI
ZIP/Postal Code
50134
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Milano
State/Province
MI
ZIP/Postal Code
20100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Milano
State/Province
MI
ZIP/Postal Code
20132
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Roma
State/Province
RM
ZIP/Postal Code
00144
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Torino
State/Province
TO
ZIP/Postal Code
10122
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bari
ZIP/Postal Code
70124
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Udine
ZIP/Postal Code
33100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Leiden 2333 ZA
ZIP/Postal Code
2333
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Rotterdam
ZIP/Postal Code
3011 BH
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Tilburg
ZIP/Postal Code
5022 GC
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bielsko-Biala
ZIP/Postal Code
43-300
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Gdansk
ZIP/Postal Code
80-809
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Kraków
ZIP/Postal Code
31-501
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Lublin
ZIP/Postal Code
20-079
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Warszawa
ZIP/Postal Code
02-005
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Wroclaw
ZIP/Postal Code
50-556
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Coimbra
ZIP/Postal Code
3000-354
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Coimbra
ZIP/Postal Code
3030-163
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Lisboa
ZIP/Postal Code
1050-085
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Lisboa
ZIP/Postal Code
1349-019
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Porto
ZIP/Postal Code
4099-001
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Porto
ZIP/Postal Code
4200-319
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Zilina
State/Province
Slovak Republic
ZIP/Postal Code
010 01
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Banska Bystrica
ZIP/Postal Code
975 17
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bratislava
ZIP/Postal Code
826 06
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bratislava
ZIP/Postal Code
851 07
Country
Slovakia
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Valladolid
State/Province
Castilla y Leon
ZIP/Postal Code
47011
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Barcelona
State/Province
Cataluña
ZIP/Postal Code
08022
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Barcelona
State/Province
Cataluña
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
L´Hospitalet de Llobregat
State/Province
Cataluña
ZIP/Postal Code
08907
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Alicante
State/Province
Comunidad Valenciana
ZIP/Postal Code
03016
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Valencia
State/Province
Comunidad Valenciana
ZIP/Postal Code
46014
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Valencia
State/Province
Comunidad Valenciana
ZIP/Postal Code
46015
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Santiago de Compostela
State/Province
Galicia
ZIP/Postal Code
15706
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bilbao
State/Province
Pais Vasco
ZIP/Postal Code
48006
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28046
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Örebro
ZIP/Postal Code
701 85
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bern
ZIP/Postal Code
3012
Country
Switzerland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Lausanne
ZIP/Postal Code
1007
Country
Switzerland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Olten
ZIP/Postal Code
4600
Country
Switzerland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Zuerich
ZIP/Postal Code
8063
Country
Switzerland
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Frimley
State/Province
Surrey
ZIP/Postal Code
GU16 7UJ
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Belfast
ZIP/Postal Code
BT12 6BA
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Birmingham
ZIP/Postal Code
B9 5SS
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Bristol
ZIP/Postal Code
BS1 2LX
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
EC1V 2PD
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
London
ZIP/Postal Code
NW1 5QH
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Newcastle upon Tyne
ZIP/Postal Code
NE1 4LP
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Plymouth
ZIP/Postal Code
PL4 6PL
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Novartis Investigative Site
City
Southampton
ZIP/Postal Code
SO16 6YD
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34934034
Citation
Pawloff M, Bogunovic H, Gruber A, Michl M, Riedl S, Schmidt-Erfurth U. SYSTEMATIC CORRELATION OF CENTRAL SUBFIELD THICKNESS WITH RETINAL FLUID VOLUMES QUANTIFIED BY DEEP LEARNING IN THE MAJOR EXUDATIVE MACULAR DISEASES. Retina. 2022 May 1;42(5):831-841. doi: 10.1097/IAE.0000000000003385.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
28807635
Citation
Tadayoni R, Waldstein SM, Boscia F, Gerding H, Gekkieva M, Barnes E, Das Gupta A, Wenzel A, Pearce I; BRIGHTER Study Group. Sustained Benefits of Ranibizumab with or without Laser in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: 24-Month Results of the BRIGHTER Study. Ophthalmology. 2017 Dec;124(12):1778-1787. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2017.06.027. Epub 2017 Aug 12. Erratum In: Ophthalmology. 2018 Mar;125(3):463.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
27039022
Citation
Tadayoni R, Waldstein SM, Boscia F, Gerding H, Pearce I, Priglinger S, Wenzel A, Barnes E, Gekkieva M, Pilz S, Mones J; BRIGHTER study group. Individualized Stabilization Criteria-Driven Ranibizumab versus Laser in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion: Six-Month Results of BRIGHTER. Ophthalmology. 2016 Jun;123(6):1332-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.02.030. Epub 2016 Mar 30.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Efficacy and Safety of Ranibizumab With or Without Laser in Comparison to Laser in Branch Retinal Vein Occlusion

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs