Endoscopic Versus Laparoscopic Myotomy for Treatment of Idiopathic Achalasia (POEMrct)
Primary Purpose
Achalasia
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM)
Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy (LHM)
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Achalasia focused on measuring Achalasia, Heller Myotomy, Dysphagia, Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy, LHM, POEM
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with symptomatic achalasia with an Eckardt score of > 3 and pre-op barium swallow, manometry and esophagogastroduodenoscopy consistent with the diagnosis
- Persons of age > 18 years with medical indication for surgical myotomy or EBD
- Signed written Informed Consent
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with previous surgery of the stomach or esophagus
- Patients with known coagulopathy
- Previous surgical achalasia treatment
- Patients with liver cirrhosis and/or esophageal varices
- Active esophagitis
- Eosinophilic esophagitis
- Barrett's esophagus
- Pregnancy
- Stricture of the esophagus
- Malignant or premalignant esophageal lesion
- Severe Candida esophagitis
- Hiatal hernia > 1cm
- Extensive tortuous dilatation (>7cm luminal diameter, S shape) of the esophagus
- Advanced malignant tumor with prognosis < 2 years
Sites / Locations
- University Hospital Leuven
- University Hospital Prague (IKEM)
- Klinikum Augsburg,Klinik für Innere Medizin III
- Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf
- University Hospital Würzburg
- Istituto Clinico Humanitas
- Academic Medical Center
- Ersta Hospital and Karolinska University Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy POEM
Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy LHM
Arm Description
Patients with Achalasia, designated to receive a myotomy of the lower esophageal sphincter, who have been randomised into the POEM therapy group
Patients with Achalasia, designated to receive a myotomy of the lower esophageal sphincter, who have been randomised into the LHM therapy group.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Eckhard symptom scores
Achalasia symptom questionnaire to evaluate individual therapy success, range from 0 (no Achalasia symptoms) to 12 (full symptom range), treatment success is defined as an Eckardt Score ≤ 3
Secondary Outcome Measures
Eckhard symptom scores
Achalasia symptom questionnaire to evaluate individual therapy success, range from 0 (no Achalasia symptoms) to 12 (full symptom range)
Treatment success rates
success rates result from Eckardt Scores
Manometry data
Achalasia subtypes (before treatment) and assessment of lower esophagus sphincter function
Reflux score (clinical DeMeester score)
clinical DeMeester Reflux questionnaire to evaluate therapeutic side effects, range from 0 (no Reflux symptoms) to 6 (full symptom range).
Reflux symptoms
List of side effects due to reflux past POEM as short term and long term outcomes
pH metry
pH metry data after therapy
Adverse Events
complication rate (Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE))
Quality of Life index
Life quality assessment (gastrointestinal LQ index by Eypasch, Wood-Dauphinee and Troidl) for individual success Evaluation (GIQLI), Best outcome score is 144.
EGD findings
EGD findings to evaluate reflux effects after therapy
CRP lab values
CRP values measured in mg/l (milligrams per litre) pre and post procedure
Hb lab values
Hemoglobin values measured in g/dl (grams per decilitre) pre and post procedure
Leucocyte lab values
Leucocyte values measured in billions per litre pre and post procedure, number of days of hospitalisation, myotomy length, duration of procedure
number of days of hospitalisation
inhouse stay after procedure
myotomy length
myotomy length in cm
duration of procedure
duration of procedure in minutes
Therapy failures
number of therapy failures
Retreatments
number and kinds of retreatments
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01601678
First Posted
May 15, 2012
Last Updated
June 27, 2023
Sponsor
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Collaborators
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA), Karolinska University Hospital, University Hospital Prague (IKEM), Prague, Czech Republic, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Wuerzburg University Hospital, University Hospital Augsburg
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01601678
Brief Title
Endoscopic Versus Laparoscopic Myotomy for Treatment of Idiopathic Achalasia
Acronym
POEMrct
Official Title
Endoscopic Versus Laparoscopic Myotomy for Treatment of Idiopathic Achalasia: A Randomized, Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 2012 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 30, 2022 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 30, 2023 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
Collaborators
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA), Karolinska University Hospital, University Hospital Prague (IKEM), Prague, Czech Republic, Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven, Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Wuerzburg University Hospital, University Hospital Augsburg
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Achalasia is a rare neurodegenerative esophageal motility disorder characterized by incomplete lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation, increased LES tone, and aperistalsis of the esophagus leading to dysphagia, regurgitation, and chest pain. therapies for achalasia consist of endoscopic balloon dilatation (EBD) and botulinum toxin injection (EBTI), or surgical Treatment via i Heller Myotomy; surgery is nowadays mostly performed via the laparoscopic approach. Surgical therapy demonstrated superior treatment efficacy compared to EBD and EBTI. Recently, an endoscopic means to perform myotomy via a submucosal tunnel has been developed, namely PerOral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM). Uncontrolled studies have indicated a symptomatic success rate of >90% for POEM in short term follow-ups.The aim of this study is to compare short and long-term feasibility, safety and efficacy of endoscopic (POEM) with laparoscopic myotomy (Heller myotomy) in the treatment of achalasia.
Detailed Description
Achalasia is considered a primary esophageal motility disorder which is defined as an insufficient relaxation of the lower esophageal sphincter. Incomplete lower esophageal sphincter (LES) relaxation, increased LES tone, and aperistalsis of the esophagus are characteristics of achalasia. Incidence peaks between ages 20 to 40. The most commonly reported symptoms are dysphagia (both for solids and liquids), regurgitation, and chest pain. The diagnosis is established with esophageal manometry and barium swallow radiographic studies and also with endoscopy being performed to exclude neoplastic or inflammatory diseases. Endoscopic therapies consist of either balloon dilatation (EBD) or Botulinum toxin injection (EBTI). The surgical treatment for achalasia is Heller Myotomy, nowadays almost exclusively performed laparoscopically.Superior to EBD and EBTI, surgical myotomy has shown sustained therapeutic efficacy in approximately 90% of patients which may be especially relevant for young patients with achalasia.
Recently an endoscopic technique to create myotomy via a submucosal tunnel has been developed, named PerOral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM). The technique was first reported by Pasricha et al. in a porcine study, and Inoue et al. later reported the first clinical results in achalasia patients which showed significantly reduced dysphagia symptom scores and decreased resting lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pressures in 17 patients with a mean follow-up of 5 months . No serious complications related to POEM were encountered in this initial single-center trial. Several smaller pilot studies from Asia, Europe and USA have replicated the promising results regarding feasibility, safety and short-term efficacy,leading us to hope for a similar success rate along with reduced patient discomfort At present, POEM has the potential to be the first scarless flexible endosurgical intervention to become an established clinical treatment.The technique uses a submucosal esophageal tunnel through which a distal esophageal myotomy down to the proximal stomach is performed. For POEM to be integrated into clinical routine, comparative data regarding safety and efficacy are necessary.Our study group intends to compare safety and long-term efficacy of POEM to laparoscopic Heller myotomy, the current gold-Standard, in a non-inferiority design.
Patients with symptomatic achalasia and medical indication for interventional therapy will be randomized to either POEM therapy or standard laparoscopic Heller myotomy (with anti-reflux procedure)(LHM). They will be followed up closely in a defined time pattern evolving individual life quality and achalasia scores as well as clinical scores and diagnostics over a period of 5 years.
Due to considerations concerning the comparability to other achalsia Trials (Boeckxstaens,NEJM 2011), in November 2012 primary outcome has been changed to Eckardt Score instead of lower sphicter pressure. Amendment was done before patient inclusion started. Sample size was not affected by amendment.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Achalasia
Keywords
Achalasia, Heller Myotomy, Dysphagia, Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy, LHM, POEM
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
240 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy POEM
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients with Achalasia, designated to receive a myotomy of the lower esophageal sphincter, who have been randomised into the POEM therapy group
Arm Title
Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy LHM
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients with Achalasia, designated to receive a myotomy of the lower esophageal sphincter, who have been randomised into the LHM therapy group.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM)
Intervention Description
After lavage, measure gastro-esophageal junction (GEJ) in cm from mouth piece. Determine entry point 12-14cm above GEJ at the lesser curvature site, inject 10ml coloured saline, create entry point. Advance endoscope into the submucosa, dissect the submucosal tunnel up to 2-3cm into the cardia. Dissect the submucosa close to the muscularis and check endoluminally for the direction of the lesser curvature, sufficient extension onto the cardia and mucosal integrity. After tunnel completion flush with gentamycin and saline. Start myotomy from proximally to distally starting 4-5cm below the mucosal entry site; the inner circular muscle layer should be fully dissected especially at the cardia for good symptomatic results. It is vital that the mucosa of the tubular esophagus remains intact. Extend myotomy at least 2cm onto the cardia. After completion check for mucosal integrity and opening of the distal esophageal sphincter. Close the entry point with clips from distal to proximal.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Laparoscopic Heller Myotomy (LHM)
Intervention Description
Use five trocar technique with patient in the French position as for laparoscopic anti-reflux procedures. Establish 12-15 mm Hg pneumoperitoneum. Use left paramedian trocar for camera, two lateral trocars for elevating liver and retraction of stomach and two trocars for dissection and suturing. Use of robotic surgery devices is allowed. Divide phrenoesophageal ligament starting on the right and mobilize distal esophagus on the lateral and anterior side. Identify and spare anterior vagal nerve. Perform myotomy by dividing both muscle-layers extending at least 6 cm above gastroesophageal junction and at least 2-3 cm inferiorly over stomach. Perform extent downwards after dividing epiphrenic fat pad overlying cardia. Measure myotomy length. Peroperative endoscopy check is advisable. Perform anterior fundoplication according to Dor. Only if necessary mobilize fundus of the stomach by dividing short gastric vessels. Suture fundus to both cut edges of myotomy, using non-resorbable material.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Eckhard symptom scores
Description
Achalasia symptom questionnaire to evaluate individual therapy success, range from 0 (no Achalasia symptoms) to 12 (full symptom range), treatment success is defined as an Eckardt Score ≤ 3
Time Frame
2 years after treatment
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Eckhard symptom scores
Description
Achalasia symptom questionnaire to evaluate individual therapy success, range from 0 (no Achalasia symptoms) to 12 (full symptom range)
Time Frame
before,and 3 and 6 months, 1,3 and 5 years past procedure
Title
Treatment success rates
Description
success rates result from Eckardt Scores
Time Frame
3 and 6 months, and 1, 3, and 5 years post procedure
Title
Manometry data
Description
Achalasia subtypes (before treatment) and assessment of lower esophagus sphincter function
Time Frame
before, and 3 months, and 2 and 5 years post procedure
Title
Reflux score (clinical DeMeester score)
Description
clinical DeMeester Reflux questionnaire to evaluate therapeutic side effects, range from 0 (no Reflux symptoms) to 6 (full symptom range).
Time Frame
before, and 3 and 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, and 5 years post procedure
Title
Reflux symptoms
Description
List of side effects due to reflux past POEM as short term and long term outcomes
Time Frame
before, and 3 and 6 months, and 1, 2, 3, and 5 years post procedure
Title
pH metry
Description
pH metry data after therapy
Time Frame
3 months and 2 and 5 years after therapy
Title
Adverse Events
Description
complication rate (Adverse Events (AE) and Serious Adverse Events (SAE))
Time Frame
Baseline to five years past procedure
Title
Quality of Life index
Description
Life quality assessment (gastrointestinal LQ index by Eypasch, Wood-Dauphinee and Troidl) for individual success Evaluation (GIQLI), Best outcome score is 144.
Time Frame
before, and 3 months, and 2 and 5 years post procedure
Title
EGD findings
Description
EGD findings to evaluate reflux effects after therapy
Time Frame
3 months and (optional) 2 and 5 years after therapy
Title
CRP lab values
Description
CRP values measured in mg/l (milligrams per litre) pre and post procedure
Time Frame
day before procedure to day after procedure
Title
Hb lab values
Description
Hemoglobin values measured in g/dl (grams per decilitre) pre and post procedure
Time Frame
day before procedure to day after procedure
Title
Leucocyte lab values
Description
Leucocyte values measured in billions per litre pre and post procedure, number of days of hospitalisation, myotomy length, duration of procedure
Time Frame
day before procedure to day after procedure
Title
number of days of hospitalisation
Description
inhouse stay after procedure
Time Frame
through inhouse stay after procedure, an average of 2-7 days
Title
myotomy length
Description
myotomy length in cm
Time Frame
day of procedure
Title
duration of procedure
Description
duration of procedure in minutes
Time Frame
day of procedure
Title
Therapy failures
Description
number of therapy failures
Time Frame
from procedure to 5 years after procedure
Title
Retreatments
Description
number and kinds of retreatments
Time Frame
from procedure to 5 years after procedure
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients with symptomatic achalasia with an Eckardt score of > 3 and pre-op barium swallow, manometry and esophagogastroduodenoscopy consistent with the diagnosis
Persons of age > 18 years with medical indication for surgical myotomy or EBD
Signed written Informed Consent
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with previous surgery of the stomach or esophagus
Patients with known coagulopathy
Previous surgical achalasia treatment
Patients with liver cirrhosis and/or esophageal varices
Active esophagitis
Eosinophilic esophagitis
Barrett's esophagus
Pregnancy
Stricture of the esophagus
Malignant or premalignant esophageal lesion
Severe Candida esophagitis
Hiatal hernia > 1cm
Extensive tortuous dilatation (>7cm luminal diameter, S shape) of the esophagus
Advanced malignant tumor with prognosis < 2 years
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Thomas Roesch, Prof.
Organizational Affiliation
Interdisciplinary Endoscopy Department and Clinic, University Hospital Hamburg-Eppendorf, Germany
Official's Role
Study Director
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Paul Fockens, Prof.
Organizational Affiliation
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam; Netherlands
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Bengt Håkanson, Prof.
Organizational Affiliation
Department of Surgery, Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Guy Boeckxstaens, Prof.
Organizational Affiliation
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
C.T. Germer, Prof.
Organizational Affiliation
Wuerzburg University Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Riccardo Repici, Prof.
Organizational Affiliation
Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Uberto Fumagalli, Prof.
Organizational Affiliation
Istituto Clinico Humanitas, Rozzano, Italy
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Julius Spicak, Prof.
Organizational Affiliation
University Hospital Prague, Prague, Czech Republic
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Helmut Messmann, Prof.
Organizational Affiliation
Department for Internal Medicine III, Klinikum Augsburg, Germany
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University Hospital Leuven
City
Leuven
ZIP/Postal Code
3000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
University Hospital Prague (IKEM)
City
Prague
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Klinikum Augsburg,Klinik für Innere Medizin III
City
Augsburg
ZIP/Postal Code
86156
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitätsklinikum Eppendorf
City
Hamburg
ZIP/Postal Code
20246
Country
Germany
Facility Name
University Hospital Würzburg
City
Würzburg
ZIP/Postal Code
97080
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Istituto Clinico Humanitas
City
Rozzano
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Academic Medical Center
City
Amsterdam
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Ersta Hospital and Karolinska University Hospital
City
Stockholm
ZIP/Postal Code
S141 86
Country
Sweden
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
19106675
Citation
Campos GM, Vittinghoff E, Rabl C, Takata M, Gadenstatter M, Lin F, Ciovica R. Endoscopic and surgical treatments for achalasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Surg. 2009 Jan;249(1):45-57. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818e43ab.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19940967
Citation
von Rahden BH, Germer CT. [Laparoscopic myotomy for achalasia is clearly superior to the endoscopic treatment]. Chirurg. 2010 Jan;81(1):69-70. doi: 10.1007/s00104-009-1840-7. No abstract available. German.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19092347
Citation
Rebecchi F, Giaccone C, Farinella E, Campaci R, Morino M. Randomized controlled trial of laparoscopic Heller myotomy plus Dor fundoplication versus Nissen fundoplication for achalasia: long-term results. Ann Surg. 2008 Dec;248(6):1023-30. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318190a776.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18216530
Citation
Ortiz A, de Haro LF, Parrilla P, Lage A, Perez D, Munitiz V, Ruiz D, Molina J. Very long-term objective evaluation of heller myotomy plus posterior partial fundoplication in patients with achalasia of the cardia. Ann Surg. 2008 Feb;247(2):258-64. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e318159d7dd.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20428893
Citation
Perretta S, Dallemagne B, Allemann P, Marescaux J. Multimedia manuscript. Heller myotomy and intraluminal fundoplication: a NOTES technique. Surg Endosc. 2010 Nov;24(11):2903. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1073-3. Epub 2010 Apr 29. Erratum In: Surg Endosc.2010 Nov;24(11):2904. Alleman, Pierre [corrected to Allemann, Pierre].
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17703382
Citation
Pasricha PJ, Hawari R, Ahmed I, Chen J, Cotton PB, Hawes RH, Kalloo AN, Kantsevoy SV, Gostout CJ. Submucosal endoscopic esophageal myotomy: a novel experimental approach for the treatment of achalasia. Endoscopy. 2007 Sep;39(9):761-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-966764.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20354937
Citation
Inoue H, Minami H, Kobayashi Y, Sato Y, Kaga M, Suzuki M, Satodate H, Odaka N, Itoh H, Kudo S. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for esophageal achalasia. Endoscopy. 2010 Apr;42(4):265-71. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1244080. Epub 2010 Mar 30.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22068665
Citation
von Renteln D, Inoue H, Minami H, Werner YB, Pace A, Kersten JF, Much CC, Schachschal G, Mann O, Keller J, Fuchs KH, Rosch T. Peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia: a prospective single center study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2012 Mar;107(3):411-7. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2011.388. Epub 2011 Nov 8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21996484
Citation
Swanstrom LL, Rieder E, Dunst CM. A stepwise approach and early clinical experience in peroral endoscopic myotomy for the treatment of achalasia and esophageal motility disorders. J Am Coll Surg. 2011 Dec;213(6):751-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2011.09.001. Epub 2011 Oct 13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21561346
Citation
Boeckxstaens GE, Annese V, des Varannes SB, Chaussade S, Costantini M, Cuttitta A, Elizalde JI, Fumagalli U, Gaudric M, Rohof WO, Smout AJ, Tack J, Zwinderman AH, Zaninotto G, Busch OR; European Achalasia Trial Investigators. Pneumatic dilation versus laparoscopic Heller's myotomy for idiopathic achalasia. N Engl J Med. 2011 May 12;364(19):1807-16. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1010502.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21948538
Citation
ZHOU PH, CAI MY, YAO LQ, ZHONG YS, REN Z, XU MD, CHEN WF, QIN XY. [Peroral endoscopic myotomy for esophageal achalasia: report of 42 cases]. Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2011 Sep;14(9):705-8. Chinese.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16632991
Citation
Smith CD, Stival A, Howell DL, Swafford V. Endoscopic therapy for achalasia before Heller myotomy results in worse outcomes than heller myotomy alone. Ann Surg. 2006 May;243(5):579-84; discussion 584-6. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000217524.75529.2d.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31800987
Citation
Werner YB, Hakanson B, Martinek J, Repici A, von Rahden BHA, Bredenoord AJ, Bisschops R, Messmann H, Vollberg MC, Noder T, Kersten JF, Mann O, Izbicki J, Pazdro A, Fumagalli U, Rosati R, Germer CT, Schijven MP, Emmermann A, von Renteln D, Fockens P, Boeckxstaens G, Rosch T. Endoscopic or Surgical Myotomy in Patients with Idiopathic Achalasia. N Engl J Med. 2019 Dec 5;381(23):2219-2229. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1905380.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Endoscopic Versus Laparoscopic Myotomy for Treatment of Idiopathic Achalasia
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs