Efficacy and Safety Trial of Pangramin SLIT HDM-mix in Subjects With House Dust Mite Induced Rhinitis
Primary Purpose
Allergic Rhinitis
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Pangramin SLIT HDM mix.
Placebo
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Allergic Rhinitis focused on measuring House dust mite induced allergic rhinitis.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or female ≥ 5 to ≤ 55 years of age.
- A history HDM induced allergic rhinitis.
- Use of medication for the control of rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms.
- Positive Skin Prick Test (SPT).
- Positive specific IgE.
Exclusion Criteria:
- PEF ≤ 70% of predicted value.
- History of significant symptomatic seasonal or perennial allergic rhinitis and/or asthma caused by an allergen to which the patient is regularly exposed, and sensitized (e.g. pollens, cat, dog, cockroach…except house dust mites).
- Severe asthma.
- Current symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection or other relevant infectious process.
- Current food allergies with oral allergy syndrome.
- A clinical history of chronic sinusitis.
- Current severe atopic dermatitis.
- Concomitant or previous treatment by immunotherapy.
Sites / Locations
- No.2, Chongwenmennei Street, Dongcheng District
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
PANGRAMIN SLIT HDM MIX
Placebo
Arm Description
PANGRAMIN SLIT HDM MIX Up-dosing phase (vial 0 to vial 4) + maintenance phase (3 times per week), for 12 months.
Placebo Up-dosing phase (vial 0 to vial 4) + maintenance phase (3 times per week), for 12 months.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
The Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptoms Score at 11 - 12 Months Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.
Subjects completed symptom assessments and recorded the results in the patient diary cards on a daily basis. A total of six rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms were measured on a scale from 0-3 as follows:
0 = No symptoms.
= Mild symptoms.
= Moderate symptoms. 3= Severe symptoms.
The six symptoms are classified in 2 groups as follows:
Nose symptoms: Runny nose, Blocked nose, Sneezing, Itchy nose; Eye symptoms: Gritty feeling/red/itchy eyes, Watery eyes. The six symptom scores were summed to obtain the rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms score with range 0(best) to 18(worst).
Baseline was set as 8 weeks before randomization as from V1 (Week -8) to V2 (Week 0). 11-12months' end evaluation period was set from V8(Week 44) to V9(Week 52). These two average rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms scores (Baseline and 11-12months) were calculated for each patient as the sum of the daily score throughout the 2 months(8 weeks in count) in evaluation period and divided with the days with diary.
The Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Medication Score at 11 - 12 Months Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.
Subjects were provided with open-labelled rescue medication to be used as needed for treatment of their rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms. Subjects reported their use of specific rescue medication via the patient diary cards. Scoring principles were applied to transform the number of rescue medication doses used into medication scores.The scores of all the medication used were summed to produce the daily rhinoconjunctivitis medication score range from 0 to 32. A lower medication score means the patient use less medication, and represent a better outcome; on the contrary, a higher medication score means the patient use more medication, and represent a worse outcome.
Baseline was from V1 (Week -8) to V2 (Week 0). The end evaluation period was set from V8(Week 44) to V9(Week 52). These two average scores (Baseline and End) were calculated for each patient as the sum of the daily score throughout the 2 months(8 weeks in count) in evaluation period and divided with the days in diary.
Secondary Outcome Measures
The Change From Baseline in Rhinitis Symptom Score at 11 - 12 Months Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.
Subjects were instructed by the investigator on how to complete symptom assessments and recorded the results in the patient diary cards on a daily basis.
A total of 4 rhinitis symptoms were measured on a scale from 0-3 as follows:
0 = No symptoms.
= Mild symptoms.
= Moderate symptoms. 3= Severe symptoms. The 4 symptoms are as follows: Runny nose, Blocked nose, Sneezing, Itchy nose. The 4 symptom scores were summed to obtain the rhinitis symptoms score with range 0(best) to 12(worst).
Baseline was set as 8 weeks before randomization as from V1 (Week -8) to V2 (Week 0). 11-12months' end evaluation period was set from V8(Week 44) to V9(Week 52). These two average scores (Baseline and 11-12months) were calculated for each patient as the sum of the daily score throughout the 2 months(8 weeks in count) in evaluation period and divided with the days with diary.
The Change From Baseline in Conjunctivitis Symptom Score at 11 - 12 Months Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.
Subjects were instructed by the investigator on how to complete symptom assessments and recorded the results in the patient diary cards on a daily basis.
A total of 2 conjunctivitis symptoms were measured on a scale from 0-3 as follows:
0 = No symptoms.
= Mild symptoms.
= Moderate symptoms. 3= Severe symptoms. The 2 symptoms as follows: Gritty feeling/red/itchy eyes, Watery eyes. The 2 symptom scores were summed to obtain the conjunctivitis symptoms score with range 0(best) to 6(worst).
Baseline was set as 8 weeks before randomization as from V1 (Week -8) to V2 (Week 0). 11-12months' end evaluation period was set from V8(Week 44) to V9(Week 52). These two average scores (Baseline and 11-12months) were calculated for each patient as the sum of the daily score throughout the 2 months(8 weeks in count) in evaluation period and divided with the days with diary.
The Change From Baseline in Asthma Symptom Score at 11 - 12 Months Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.
Subjects were instructed by the investigator on how to complete symptom assessments and recorded the results in the patient diary cards on a daily basis.
A total of 4 Asthma symptoms were measured on a scale from 0-3 as follows:
0 = No symptoms.
= Mild symptoms.
= Moderate symptoms. 3= Severe symptoms. The 4 symptoms as follows: Cough, Wheeze, Chest tightness/shortness of breath (dyspnoea), Exercise induced symptoms. The 4 symptom scores were summed to obtain the asthma symptoms score with range 0(best) to 12(worst).
Baseline was set as 8 weeks before randomization as from V1 (Week -8) to V2 (Week 0). 11-12months' end evaluation period was set from V8(Week 44) to V9(Week 52). These two average scores (Baseline and 11-12months) were calculated for each patient as the sum of the daily score throughout the 2 months(8 weeks in count) in evaluation period and divided with the days with diary.
Percentage of Healthy Days in This Study Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.
A healthy day is a day without rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms and without any intake of rescue medication. Percentage of healthy days is the healthy days of subject in this study divided by the total study days.
The Change From Baseline in Nasal Complain Scores on Visual Analog Scale at 11-12 Months Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.
The average rhinoconjunctivitis VAS score (baseline to first year). The scale answers the question 'How have your nasal complaints been today?' from 0 = no symptoms to 10 = severe symptoms.
The baseline VAS rhinoconjunctivitis score is the average value of VAS scores in V1 (Screen Visit, Week -8) and V2 (Randomization visit, Week 0), and Evaluation period (Months 11-12) VAS rhinoconjunctivitis score is the average value of VAS scores in V8 (Week 44) and V9 (Week 52).
The Change From Baseline in Rhinitis Quality of Life Questionnaire at 12 Months Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.
The baseline RQLQ value was collected in Visit 1 (Week -8) and the 12 months' RQLQ value was collected in Visit 9 (Week 52).
The maximum value of RQLQ score is 168 and the minimum one is 0. The score is decreased as the life quality is better.
Global Assessment of Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom After Treatment Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.
Comparing overall rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms at the end of study year Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.
The Change From Baseline in Rhinitis Medication Score at 11 - 12 Months Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.
Subjects were provided with open-labelled rescue medication to be used as needed for treatment of their Rhinitis symptoms. Subjects reported their use of specific rescue medication via the patient diary cards. Scoring principles were applied to transform the number of rescue medication doses used into medication scores. The scores of all the medication used were summed to produce the daily Rhinitis medication score range from 0 to 30. A lower medication score means the patient use less medication, and represent a better outcome; on the contrary, a higher medication score means the patient use more medication, and represent a worse outcome.
Baseline was set as from V1 (Week -8) to V2 (Week 0). 11-12months' end evaluation period was set from V8(Week 44) to V9(Week 52). These two average scores (Baseline and 11-12months) were calculated for each patient as the sum of the daily score throughout the 2 months(8 weeks in count) in evaluation period and divided with the days with diary.
The Change From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire at 12 Months Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.
The baseline AQLQ value was collected in Visit 1 (Week -8) and the 12 months' RQLQ value was collected in Visit 9 (Week 52). The maximum value of RQLQ score is 217 and the minimum one is 0. The score is elevated as the life quality is better.
The Change From Baseline in Asthma Medication Score at 11 - 12 Months Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated
Subjects were provided with open-labelled rescue medication to be used as needed for treatment of their Asthma symptoms. Subjects reported their use of specific rescue medication via the patient diary cards. Scoring principles were applied to transform the number of rescue medication doses used into medication scores. The scores of all the medication used were summed to produce the daily asthma medication score range from 0 to 32. A lower medication score means the patient use less medication, and represent a better outcome; on the contrary, a higher medication score means the patient use more medication, and represent a worse outcome.
Baseline was set as from V1 (Week -8) to V2 (Week 0). 11-12months' end evaluation period was set from V8(Week 44) to V9(Week 52). These two average scores (Baseline and 11-12months) were calculated for each patient as the sum of the daily score throughout the 2 months in evaluation period and divided with the days with diary.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01603056
Brief Title
Efficacy and Safety Trial of Pangramin SLIT HDM-mix in Subjects With House Dust Mite Induced Rhinitis
Official Title
A Randomised, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Phase III Multicentre Clinical Trial Investigating the Efficacy and Safety of Pangramin SLIT HDM-mix in Chinese Population With House Dust Mite Induced Rhinitis With or Without Asthma.
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2016
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 2009 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
February 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 2012 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
ALK-Abelló A/S
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Primary aim is to evaluate the efficacy of specific immunotherapy with Pangramin SLIT HDM-mix compared to placebo in the treatment of House Dust Mite (HDM) induced rhinitis with or without asthma.
Sublingual immunotherapy has been used during several years and has been shown to provide benefits compare to traditional subcutaneous treatment. This study will investigate if improvements in rhinitis symptoms and less use of symptomatic medication can be obtained as a consequence of being treated under specific immunotherapy.
This study aim also to contribute to the documentation of tolerability and safety profile of Pangramin HDM Mix.
Detailed Description
Extensive clinical experience has been gained due to the widespread use of Pangramin® SLIT and other SLIT products as named patient products, both with respect to the types and the frequencies of the adverse events(AEs) observed. No safety concerns have been found.
The optimal therapeutic dose range regarding SLIT is not fully elucidated. The fate of the allergen after sublingual administration is not known in detail, i.e. to what extent is the allergen absorbed over the mucosa or swallowed and how this is related to volume, excipients etc. The relationship between dose and effect is thus not fully elucidated. The general recommendation is to use a dose inducing a clinical relevant effect in most patients without causing unacceptable adverse events. As Pangramin SLIT HDM-mix has a safety profile that allows a single daily intake by the patient at home, the dosage at this trial will be the same as marketed product.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Allergic Rhinitis
Keywords
House dust mite induced allergic rhinitis.
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
617 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
PANGRAMIN SLIT HDM MIX
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
PANGRAMIN SLIT HDM MIX Up-dosing phase (vial 0 to vial 4) + maintenance phase (3 times per week), for 12 months.
Arm Title
Placebo
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo Up-dosing phase (vial 0 to vial 4) + maintenance phase (3 times per week), for 12 months.
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Pangramin SLIT HDM mix.
Intervention Description
Up-dosing phase (vial 0 to vial 4) + maintenance phase (3 times per week), for 12 months.
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Up-dosing phase (vial 0 to vial 4) + maintenance phase (3 times per week), for 12 months.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptoms Score at 11 - 12 Months Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.
Description
Subjects completed symptom assessments and recorded the results in the patient diary cards on a daily basis. A total of six rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms were measured on a scale from 0-3 as follows:
0 = No symptoms.
= Mild symptoms.
= Moderate symptoms. 3= Severe symptoms.
The six symptoms are classified in 2 groups as follows:
Nose symptoms: Runny nose, Blocked nose, Sneezing, Itchy nose; Eye symptoms: Gritty feeling/red/itchy eyes, Watery eyes. The six symptom scores were summed to obtain the rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms score with range 0(best) to 18(worst).
Baseline was set as 8 weeks before randomization as from V1 (Week -8) to V2 (Week 0). 11-12months' end evaluation period was set from V8(Week 44) to V9(Week 52). These two average rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms scores (Baseline and 11-12months) were calculated for each patient as the sum of the daily score throughout the 2 months(8 weeks in count) in evaluation period and divided with the days with diary.
Time Frame
Baseline: From V1 date(Week -8) to V2 date(Week 0); 11-12months: From V8 date(Week 44) to V9 date(Week 52).
Title
The Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Medication Score at 11 - 12 Months Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.
Description
Subjects were provided with open-labelled rescue medication to be used as needed for treatment of their rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms. Subjects reported their use of specific rescue medication via the patient diary cards. Scoring principles were applied to transform the number of rescue medication doses used into medication scores.The scores of all the medication used were summed to produce the daily rhinoconjunctivitis medication score range from 0 to 32. A lower medication score means the patient use less medication, and represent a better outcome; on the contrary, a higher medication score means the patient use more medication, and represent a worse outcome.
Baseline was from V1 (Week -8) to V2 (Week 0). The end evaluation period was set from V8(Week 44) to V9(Week 52). These two average scores (Baseline and End) were calculated for each patient as the sum of the daily score throughout the 2 months(8 weeks in count) in evaluation period and divided with the days in diary.
Time Frame
Baseline: From V1 date(Week -8) to V2 date(Week 0); 11-12months: From V8 date(Week 44) to V9 date(Week 52).
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The Change From Baseline in Rhinitis Symptom Score at 11 - 12 Months Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.
Description
Subjects were instructed by the investigator on how to complete symptom assessments and recorded the results in the patient diary cards on a daily basis.
A total of 4 rhinitis symptoms were measured on a scale from 0-3 as follows:
0 = No symptoms.
= Mild symptoms.
= Moderate symptoms. 3= Severe symptoms. The 4 symptoms are as follows: Runny nose, Blocked nose, Sneezing, Itchy nose. The 4 symptom scores were summed to obtain the rhinitis symptoms score with range 0(best) to 12(worst).
Baseline was set as 8 weeks before randomization as from V1 (Week -8) to V2 (Week 0). 11-12months' end evaluation period was set from V8(Week 44) to V9(Week 52). These two average scores (Baseline and 11-12months) were calculated for each patient as the sum of the daily score throughout the 2 months(8 weeks in count) in evaluation period and divided with the days with diary.
Time Frame
Baseline: From V1 date(Week -8) to V2 date(Week 0); 11-12months: From V8 date(Week 44) to V9 date(Week 52).
Title
The Change From Baseline in Conjunctivitis Symptom Score at 11 - 12 Months Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.
Description
Subjects were instructed by the investigator on how to complete symptom assessments and recorded the results in the patient diary cards on a daily basis.
A total of 2 conjunctivitis symptoms were measured on a scale from 0-3 as follows:
0 = No symptoms.
= Mild symptoms.
= Moderate symptoms. 3= Severe symptoms. The 2 symptoms as follows: Gritty feeling/red/itchy eyes, Watery eyes. The 2 symptom scores were summed to obtain the conjunctivitis symptoms score with range 0(best) to 6(worst).
Baseline was set as 8 weeks before randomization as from V1 (Week -8) to V2 (Week 0). 11-12months' end evaluation period was set from V8(Week 44) to V9(Week 52). These two average scores (Baseline and 11-12months) were calculated for each patient as the sum of the daily score throughout the 2 months(8 weeks in count) in evaluation period and divided with the days with diary.
Time Frame
Baseline: From V1 date(Week -8) to V2 date(Week 0); 11-12months: From V8 date(Week 44) to V9 date(Week 52).
Title
The Change From Baseline in Asthma Symptom Score at 11 - 12 Months Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.
Description
Subjects were instructed by the investigator on how to complete symptom assessments and recorded the results in the patient diary cards on a daily basis.
A total of 4 Asthma symptoms were measured on a scale from 0-3 as follows:
0 = No symptoms.
= Mild symptoms.
= Moderate symptoms. 3= Severe symptoms. The 4 symptoms as follows: Cough, Wheeze, Chest tightness/shortness of breath (dyspnoea), Exercise induced symptoms. The 4 symptom scores were summed to obtain the asthma symptoms score with range 0(best) to 12(worst).
Baseline was set as 8 weeks before randomization as from V1 (Week -8) to V2 (Week 0). 11-12months' end evaluation period was set from V8(Week 44) to V9(Week 52). These two average scores (Baseline and 11-12months) were calculated for each patient as the sum of the daily score throughout the 2 months(8 weeks in count) in evaluation period and divided with the days with diary.
Time Frame
Baseline: From V1 date(Week -8) to V2 date(Week 0); 11-12months: From V8 date(Week 44) to V9 date(Week 52).
Title
Percentage of Healthy Days in This Study Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.
Description
A healthy day is a day without rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms and without any intake of rescue medication. Percentage of healthy days is the healthy days of subject in this study divided by the total study days.
Time Frame
Total study year
Title
The Change From Baseline in Nasal Complain Scores on Visual Analog Scale at 11-12 Months Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.
Description
The average rhinoconjunctivitis VAS score (baseline to first year). The scale answers the question 'How have your nasal complaints been today?' from 0 = no symptoms to 10 = severe symptoms.
The baseline VAS rhinoconjunctivitis score is the average value of VAS scores in V1 (Screen Visit, Week -8) and V2 (Randomization visit, Week 0), and Evaluation period (Months 11-12) VAS rhinoconjunctivitis score is the average value of VAS scores in V8 (Week 44) and V9 (Week 52).
Time Frame
Baseline: From V1 date(Week -8) to V2 date(Week 0); 11-12months: From V8 date(Week 44) to V9 date(Week 52).
Title
The Change From Baseline in Rhinitis Quality of Life Questionnaire at 12 Months Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.
Description
The baseline RQLQ value was collected in Visit 1 (Week -8) and the 12 months' RQLQ value was collected in Visit 9 (Week 52).
The maximum value of RQLQ score is 168 and the minimum one is 0. The score is decreased as the life quality is better.
Time Frame
Visit 1 date(Week -8), Visit 9 date(Week 52).
Title
Global Assessment of Rhinoconjunctivitis Symptom After Treatment Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.
Description
Comparing overall rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms at the end of study year Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.
Time Frame
Visit 9 date, Week 52
Title
The Change From Baseline in Rhinitis Medication Score at 11 - 12 Months Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.
Description
Subjects were provided with open-labelled rescue medication to be used as needed for treatment of their Rhinitis symptoms. Subjects reported their use of specific rescue medication via the patient diary cards. Scoring principles were applied to transform the number of rescue medication doses used into medication scores. The scores of all the medication used were summed to produce the daily Rhinitis medication score range from 0 to 30. A lower medication score means the patient use less medication, and represent a better outcome; on the contrary, a higher medication score means the patient use more medication, and represent a worse outcome.
Baseline was set as from V1 (Week -8) to V2 (Week 0). 11-12months' end evaluation period was set from V8(Week 44) to V9(Week 52). These two average scores (Baseline and 11-12months) were calculated for each patient as the sum of the daily score throughout the 2 months(8 weeks in count) in evaluation period and divided with the days with diary.
Time Frame
Baseline: From V1 date(Week -8) to V2 date(Week 0); 11-12months: From V8 date(Week 44) to V9 date(Week 52).
Title
The Change From Baseline in Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire at 12 Months Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated.
Description
The baseline AQLQ value was collected in Visit 1 (Week -8) and the 12 months' RQLQ value was collected in Visit 9 (Week 52). The maximum value of RQLQ score is 217 and the minimum one is 0. The score is elevated as the life quality is better.
Time Frame
Visit 1 date(Week -8), Visit 9 date(Week 52).
Title
The Change From Baseline in Asthma Medication Score at 11 - 12 Months Between the Actively Treated Patients and the Placebo Treated
Description
Subjects were provided with open-labelled rescue medication to be used as needed for treatment of their Asthma symptoms. Subjects reported their use of specific rescue medication via the patient diary cards. Scoring principles were applied to transform the number of rescue medication doses used into medication scores. The scores of all the medication used were summed to produce the daily asthma medication score range from 0 to 32. A lower medication score means the patient use less medication, and represent a better outcome; on the contrary, a higher medication score means the patient use more medication, and represent a worse outcome.
Baseline was set as from V1 (Week -8) to V2 (Week 0). 11-12months' end evaluation period was set from V8(Week 44) to V9(Week 52). These two average scores (Baseline and 11-12months) were calculated for each patient as the sum of the daily score throughout the 2 months in evaluation period and divided with the days with diary.
Time Frame
Baseline: From V1 date(Week -8) to V2 date(Week 0); 11-12months: From V8 date(Week 44) to V9 date(Week 52).
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
5 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
55 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Male or female ≥ 5 to ≤ 55 years of age.
A history HDM induced allergic rhinitis.
Use of medication for the control of rhinoconjunctivitis symptoms.
Positive Skin Prick Test (SPT).
Positive specific IgE.
Exclusion Criteria:
PEF ≤ 70% of predicted value.
History of significant symptomatic seasonal or perennial allergic rhinitis and/or asthma caused by an allergen to which the patient is regularly exposed, and sensitized (e.g. pollens, cat, dog, cockroach…except house dust mites).
Severe asthma.
Current symptoms of upper respiratory tract infection or other relevant infectious process.
Current food allergies with oral allergy syndrome.
A clinical history of chronic sinusitis.
Current severe atopic dermatitis.
Concomitant or previous treatment by immunotherapy.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Zhang Luo, Professor
Organizational Affiliation
Beijing Tongren Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
No.2, Chongwenmennei Street, Dongcheng District
City
Beijing
State/Province
Beijing
ZIP/Postal Code
100730
Country
China
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Efficacy and Safety Trial of Pangramin SLIT HDM-mix in Subjects With House Dust Mite Induced Rhinitis
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs