search
Back to results

Comparison of Senza to Commercial Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Pain (SENZA-RCT)

Primary Purpose

Chronic Low Back Pain

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Spinal Cord Stimulator
Sponsored by
Nevro Corp
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Chronic Low Back Pain focused on measuring Back pain, Spinal Cord Stimulation

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Have been diagnosed with chronic, intractable pain of the trunk and/or limbs (VAS ≥ 5) which has been refractory to conservative therapy for a minimum of 3 months.
  • Be an appropriate candidate for the surgical procedures required in this study based on the clinical judgment of the implanting physician
  • Be 18 years of age or older at the time of enrollment
  • Be willing and capable of giving informed consent
  • Be willing and able to comply with study-related requirements, procedures, and visits

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Have a medical condition or pain in other area(s), not intended to be treated with SCS, that could interfere with study procedures, accurate pain reporting, and/or confound evaluation of study endpoints, as determined by the Investigator
  • Have evidence of an active disruptive psychological or psychiatric disorder or other known condition significant enough to impact perception of pain, compliance of intervention and/or ability to evaluate treatment outcome, as determined by a psychologist
  • Have a current diagnosis of a coagulation disorder, bleeding diathesis, progressive peripheral vascular disease or uncontrolled diabetes mellitus
  • Have a diagnosis of scoliosis that precludes lead placement
  • Have an existing drug pump and/or SCS system or another active implantable device such as a pacemaker
  • Have prior experience with SCS
  • Have a condition currently requiring or likely to require the use of MRI or diathermy
  • Have metastatic malignant disease or active local malignant disease
  • Have a life expectancy of less than 1 year
  • Have an active systemic or local infection
  • Be pregnant (if female and sexually active, subject must be using a reliable form of birth control, be surgically sterile or be at least 2 years post-menopausal)
  • Have within 6 months of enrollment a significant untreated addiction to dependency producing medications or have been a substance abuser (including alcohol and illicit drugs)
  • Be concomitantly participating in another clinical study
  • Be involved in an injury claim under current litigation
  • Have a pending or approved worker's compensation claim

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Test

    Control

    Arm Description

    Subjects randomized to this arm will be trialed and implanted with the Nevro Senza System

    Subjects randomized to this arm will be trialed and implanted with a commercially available SCS system.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Change in back pain VAS and neurological status from Baseline
    The primary endpoint is a composite of effectiveness and safety. Specifically, the primary endpoint is the percentage of randomized subjects (the ITT analysis population) and subjects completing the Primary Efficacy Assessment (the PP analysis population) who respond to SCS therapy (as assessed by VAS) for back pain and do not have a stimulation-related neurological deficit at the Primary Efficacy Assessment (non-inferiority analysis). Subjects who do not have a successful Trial Phase are considered failures (non-responders) toward the primary endpoint.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Change in disability as measured by Oswestry Disability Index
    Number of subjects with adverse events

    Full Information

    First Posted
    May 30, 2012
    Last Updated
    June 30, 2015
    Sponsor
    Nevro Corp
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT01609972
    Brief Title
    Comparison of Senza to Commercial Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Pain
    Acronym
    SENZA-RCT
    Official Title
    Multi-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Clinical Trial to Demonstrate Non-Inferiority of the Senza™ Spinal Cord Stimulation (SCS) System in the Treatment of Chronic Pain as Compared to Commercially Available SCS Devices
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    June 2015
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Unknown status
    Study Start Date
    June 2012 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    May 2015 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    June 2015 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    Nevro Corp

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    Yes

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    The purpose of this investigational study is to establish the safety and effectiveness of electrical stimulation delivered to the spinal cord in subjects with chronic, intractable pain of the trunk and/or limbs and will be a comparison of the Senza System with commercially available SCS systems.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Chronic Low Back Pain
    Keywords
    Back pain, Spinal Cord Stimulation

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    356 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Test
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Subjects randomized to this arm will be trialed and implanted with the Nevro Senza System
    Arm Title
    Control
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Subjects randomized to this arm will be trialed and implanted with a commercially available SCS system.
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Spinal Cord Stimulator
    Intervention Description
    Non-inferior comparison of implantable spinal cord stimulators
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Change in back pain VAS and neurological status from Baseline
    Description
    The primary endpoint is a composite of effectiveness and safety. Specifically, the primary endpoint is the percentage of randomized subjects (the ITT analysis population) and subjects completing the Primary Efficacy Assessment (the PP analysis population) who respond to SCS therapy (as assessed by VAS) for back pain and do not have a stimulation-related neurological deficit at the Primary Efficacy Assessment (non-inferiority analysis). Subjects who do not have a successful Trial Phase are considered failures (non-responders) toward the primary endpoint.
    Time Frame
    3 months
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Change in disability as measured by Oswestry Disability Index
    Time Frame
    3, 6, 12 months
    Title
    Number of subjects with adverse events
    Time Frame
    12 months

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Have been diagnosed with chronic, intractable pain of the trunk and/or limbs (VAS ≥ 5) which has been refractory to conservative therapy for a minimum of 3 months. Be an appropriate candidate for the surgical procedures required in this study based on the clinical judgment of the implanting physician Be 18 years of age or older at the time of enrollment Be willing and capable of giving informed consent Be willing and able to comply with study-related requirements, procedures, and visits Exclusion Criteria: Have a medical condition or pain in other area(s), not intended to be treated with SCS, that could interfere with study procedures, accurate pain reporting, and/or confound evaluation of study endpoints, as determined by the Investigator Have evidence of an active disruptive psychological or psychiatric disorder or other known condition significant enough to impact perception of pain, compliance of intervention and/or ability to evaluate treatment outcome, as determined by a psychologist Have a current diagnosis of a coagulation disorder, bleeding diathesis, progressive peripheral vascular disease or uncontrolled diabetes mellitus Have a diagnosis of scoliosis that precludes lead placement Have an existing drug pump and/or SCS system or another active implantable device such as a pacemaker Have prior experience with SCS Have a condition currently requiring or likely to require the use of MRI or diathermy Have metastatic malignant disease or active local malignant disease Have a life expectancy of less than 1 year Have an active systemic or local infection Be pregnant (if female and sexually active, subject must be using a reliable form of birth control, be surgically sterile or be at least 2 years post-menopausal) Have within 6 months of enrollment a significant untreated addiction to dependency producing medications or have been a substance abuser (including alcohol and illicit drugs) Be concomitantly participating in another clinical study Be involved in an injury claim under current litigation Have a pending or approved worker's compensation claim
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Leonardo Kapural, MD
    Organizational Affiliation
    The Center for Clinical Research, Winston-Salem, NC
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    29858746
    Citation
    Amirdelfan K, Yu C, Doust MW, Gliner BE, Morgan DM, Kapural L, Vallejo R, Sitzman BT, Yearwood TL, Bundschu R, Yang T, Benyamin R, Burgher AH, Brooks ES, Powell AA, Subbaroyan J. Long-term quality of life improvement for chronic intractable back and leg pain patients using spinal cord stimulation: 12-month results from the SENZA-RCT. Qual Life Res. 2018 Aug;27(8):2035-2044. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-1890-8. Epub 2018 Jun 1.
    Results Reference
    derived

    Learn more about this trial

    Comparison of Senza to Commercial Spinal Cord Stimulation for the Treatment of Chronic Pain

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs