Impact of Restriction of the Non Paretic Upper Limb Rehabilitation of Patients a With Stroke:Randomized Clinical Trial
Primary Purpose
Stroke
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
specific training of paretic upper limb
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Stroke focused on measuring hemiparetic, cognitive, balance
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- ability to actively extend at least 10° at the metacarpophalangeal the wrist;
- more than 6 months post onset of stroke;
Exclusion Criteria:
- Mini-Mental State Examination;
- no excessive spasticity in any joints of the affected.
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
With restraint
no restraint
Arm Description
The group with restraint underwent specific training of paretic upper limb and use of restraint.
The group control "without restraint" submitted only to the specific training of paretic upper limb
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
To investigate the impact that the restriction of non-paretic upper limb recovery would have on sensorimotor with Fugl-Meyer Scale
Upper extremity motor impairment was evaluated using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale (FM).This scale has a total score of 66 points for upper limbs, reflecting a mild motor impairment (≥ 50), moderate to severe (50-20) and severe (< 20).
Secondary Outcome Measures
Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
The FIM consists of 18 items divided into 6 subscales measuring self-care, sphincter control, transfer, locomotion, communication, and social cognition ability. Each item is rated from 1 to 7 based on the required level of assistance to perform the basic ADL (maximum score, 126). Higher scores demonstrate greater independent participation in daily activities.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01623973
First Posted
June 12, 2012
Last Updated
June 19, 2012
Sponsor
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01623973
Brief Title
Impact of Restriction of the Non Paretic Upper Limb Rehabilitation of Patients a With Stroke:Randomized Clinical Trial
Official Title
Impact of the Restriction of the Non Paretic Upper Limb in Rehabilitation of Patients Post-stroke:Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2012
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
May 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
undefined (undefined)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Universidade Federal de Pernambuco
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
To evaluate whether the restriction of the non paretic upper limb (UL) is a factor that could interfere at the sensorimotor UL recovery for chronic stroke subjects and to verify the impact on daily function, quality of life. In this pilot, randomized, blind and allocation concealment clinical trial, nineteen individuals with chronic stroke was randomly assigned, after the first evaluation, into two groups: group without restriction (G1), subject only to the specific training of paretic UL, and restricted group (G2), which underwent specific training of paretic UL and use of the restriction of non paretic UL
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Stroke
Keywords
hemiparetic, cognitive, balance
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
19 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
With restraint
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The group with restraint underwent specific training of paretic upper limb and use of restraint.
Arm Title
no restraint
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The group control "without restraint" submitted only to the specific training of paretic upper limb
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
specific training of paretic upper limb
Intervention Description
nineteen individuals with chronic stroke was randomly assigned, after the first evaluation, into two groups: group without restriction (G1), subject only to the specific training of paretic UL, and restricted group (G2), which underwent specific training of paretic UL and use of the restriction of non paretic UL. The volunteers were evaluated before the beginning of the interventions, and the next day after completion of the 12 therapy sessions through the Fugl-Meyer Assessment
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
To investigate the impact that the restriction of non-paretic upper limb recovery would have on sensorimotor with Fugl-Meyer Scale
Description
Upper extremity motor impairment was evaluated using the Fugl-Meyer Assessment Scale (FM).This scale has a total score of 66 points for upper limbs, reflecting a mild motor impairment (≥ 50), moderate to severe (50-20) and severe (< 20).
Time Frame
1 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Functional Independence Measure (FIM)
Description
The FIM consists of 18 items divided into 6 subscales measuring self-care, sphincter control, transfer, locomotion, communication, and social cognition ability. Each item is rated from 1 to 7 based on the required level of assistance to perform the basic ADL (maximum score, 126). Higher scores demonstrate greater independent participation in daily activities.
Time Frame
1 year
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
ability to actively extend at least 10° at the metacarpophalangeal the wrist;
more than 6 months post onset of stroke;
Exclusion Criteria:
Mini-Mental State Examination;
no excessive spasticity in any joints of the affected.
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Impact of Restriction of the Non Paretic Upper Limb Rehabilitation of Patients a With Stroke:Randomized Clinical Trial
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs