search
Back to results

Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients With Functional Mitral Regurgitation (The COAPT Trial) and COAPT CAS (COAPT)

Primary Purpose

Mitral Regurgitation, Mitral Valve Regurgitation, Treatment of Functional Mitral Regurgitation in Symptomatic Heart Failure Subjects

Status
Active
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
MitraClip System
Sponsored by
Abbott Medical Devices
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Mitral Regurgitation focused on measuring Functional Mitral Regurgitation, Mitral Valve Regurgitation, Symptomatic Heart Failure, Functional MR, MitraClip, Mitral Valve Insufficiency, Cardiopulmonary exercise testing, COAPT CAS, COAPT Continued Access Study, MitraClip NT

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Symptomatic functional MR (≥3+) due to cardiomyopathy of either ischemic or non-ischemic etiology determined by assessment of a qualifying transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) obtained within 90 days and transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) obtained within 180 days prior to subject registration, with MR severity based principally on the TTE study, confirmed by the Echocardiography Core Lab (ECL). The ECL may request a transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) to confirm MR etiology.

    Note: Functional MR requires the presence of global or regional left ventricular wall motion abnormalities, which are believed to be the primary cause of the MR. If a flail leaflet or other evidence of degenerative MR is present, the subject is not eligible even if global or regional left ventricular systolic dysfunction is present.

    Note: Qualifying TTE must be obtained after the subject has been stabilized on optimal therapy including Guideline Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) and at least 30 days after:

    1. a greater than 100% increase or greater than 50% decrease in dose of GDMT
    2. revascularization and/or implant of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy device (CRT or CRT-D) or reprogramming of an implanted CRT or CRT-D that results in increased biventricular pacing (from <92% to ≥92%)
  2. In the judgment of the HF specialist investigator at the site, the subject has been adequately treated per applicable standards, including for coronary artery disease, left ventricular dysfunction, mitral regurgitation and heart failure (e.g., with cardiac resynchronization therapy, revascularization, and/or GDMT). The Eligibility Committee must also concur that the subject has been adequately treated.
  3. New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class II, III or ambulatory IV.
  4. The Local Site Heart Team (CT surgeon and HF specialist investigators) and the Central Eligibility Committee concur that surgery will not be offered as a treatment option and that medical therapy is the intended therapy for the subject, even if the subject is randomized to the Control group.
  5. The subject has had at least one hospitalization for heart failure in the 12 months prior to subject registration and/or a corrected brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) ≥300 pg/ml or corrected n-Terminal pro- brain natriuretic peptide NT-proBNP ≥1500 pg/ml measured within 90 days prior to subject registration ("corrected" refers to a 4% reduction in the BNP or NT-proBNP cutoff for every increase of 1 kg/m2 in BMI above a reference BMI of 20 kg/m2).

    Note: BNP or NT-proBNP must be obtained after the subject has been stabilized on GDMT and at least 30 days after:

    1. a greater than 100% increase or greater than 50% decrease in dose of GDMT
    2. revascularization and/or implant of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy device (CRT or CRT-D) or reprogramming of an implanted CRT or CRT-D that results in increased biventricular pacing (from <92% to ≥92%).
  6. Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) is ≥20% and ≤50% within 90 days prior to subject registration, assessed by the site using any one of the following methods: echocardiography, contrast left ventriculography, gated blood pool scan or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).

    Note: The method must provide a quantitative readout (not a visual assessment).

  7. The primary regurgitant jet is non-commissural, and in the opinion of the MitraClip implanting investigator can be successfully be treated by the MitraClip. If a secondary jet exists, it must be considered clinically insignificant.
  8. Creatine Kinase-MB (CK-MB) obtained within prior 14 days < local laboratory Upper Limit of Normal (ULN).
  9. Transseptal catheterization and femoral vein access is determined to be feasible by the MitraClip implanting investigator.
  10. Age 18 years or older.
  11. The subject or the subject's legal representative understands and agrees that should he/she be assigned to the Control group, he/she will be treated with medical therapy and conservative management without surgery and without the MitraClip, either domestically or abroad. If the subject would actively contemplate surgery and/or MitraClip if randomized to Control, he/she should not be registered in this trial.
  12. The subject or the subject's legal representative has been informed of the nature of the trial and agrees to its provisions, including the possibility of randomization to the Control group and returning for all required post-procedure follow-up visits, and has provided written informed consent.
  13. Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD) is ≤ 70 mm assessed by site based on a transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) obtained within 90 days prior to subject registration.

For the CPX Sub-study: Subjects have to meet the COAPT study eligibility criteria to be registered in the CPX Sub-study.

COAPT CAS study Inclusion Criteria:

1. Subjects must meet all of the above COAPT RCT inclusion criteria, and must have national Medicare coverage by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) requiring continuous home oxygen therapy or chronic outpatient oral steroid use.
  2. Untreated clinically significant coronary artery disease requiring revascularization.
  3. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) within 30 days prior to subject registration.
  4. Percutaneous coronary intervention within 30 days prior to subject registration.
  5. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) within 30 days prior to subject registration.
  6. Tricuspid valve disease requiring surgery or transcatheter intervention.
  7. Aortic valve disease requiring surgery.
  8. Cerebrovascular accident within 30 days prior to subject registration.
  9. Severe symptomatic carotid stenosis (> 70% by ultrasound).
  10. Carotid surgery or stenting within 30 days prior to subject registration.
  11. American College of Cardiology /American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Stage D heart failure.
  12. Presence of any of the following:

    • Estimated pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) > 70 mm Hg assessed by site based on echocardiography or right heart catheterization, unless active vasodilator therapy in the cath lab is able to reduce the pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) to < 3 Wood Units or between 3 and 4.5 Wood Units with v wave less than twice the mean of the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure
    • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, restrictive cardiomyopathy, constrictive pericarditis, or any other structural heart disease causing heart failure other than dilated cardiomyopathy of either ischemic or non ischemic etiology
    • Infiltrative cardiomyopathies (e.g., amyloidosis, hemochromatosis, sarcoidosis)
    • Hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic support or mechanical heart assistance.
  13. Physical evidence of right-sided congestive heart failure with echocardiographic evidence of moderate or severe right ventricular dysfunction as assessed by site.
  14. Implant of any Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) or Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with cardioverter-defibrillator (CRT-D) within the last 30days prior to subject registration.
  15. Mitral valve orifice area < 4.0 cm2 assessed by site based on a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) within 90 days prior to subject registration.
  16. Leaflet anatomy which may preclude MitraClip implantation, proper MitraClip positioning on the leaflets or sufficient reduction in MR by the MitraClip. This evaluation is based on transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) evaluation of the mitral valve within 180 days prior to subject registration and includes:

    • Insufficient mobile leaflet available for grasping with the MitraClip device
    • Evidence of calcification in the grasping area
    • Presence of a significant cleft in the grasping area
    • Lack of both primary and secondary chordal support in the grasping area
    • Leaflet mobility length < 1 cm
  17. Hemodynamic instability defined as systolic pressure < 90 mmHg with or without afterload reduction, cardiogenic shock or the need for inotropic support or intra-aortic balloon pump or other hemodynamic support device.
  18. Need for emergent or urgent surgery for any reason or any planned cardiac surgery within the next 12 months.
  19. Life expectancy < 12 months due to non-cardiac conditions.
  20. Modified Rankin Scale ≥ 4 disability.
  21. Status 1 heart transplant or prior orthotopic heart transplantation.
  22. Prior mitral valve leaflet surgery or any currently implanted prosthetic mitral valve, or any prior transcatheter mitral valve procedure.
  23. Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation.
  24. Active endocarditis or active rheumatic heart disease or leaflets degenerated from rheumatic disease (i.e., noncompliant, perforated).
  25. Active infections requiring current antibiotic therapy.
  26. Subjects in whom transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is contraindicated or high risk.
  27. Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to procedural medications which cannot be adequately managed medically.
  28. Pregnant or planning pregnancy within next 12 months.

    Note: Female patients of childbearing age should be instructed to use safe contraception (e.g. intrauterine devices, hormonal contraceptives: contraceptive pills, implants, transdermal patches hormonal vaginal devices, injections with prolonged release.

  29. Currently participating in an investigational drug or another device study that has not reached its primary endpoint. Note: Trials requiring extended follow-up for products that were investigational, but have since become commercially available, are not considered investigational trials.
  30. Subject belongs to a vulnerable population per investigator's judgment or subject has any kind of disorder that compromises his/her ability to give written informed consent and/or to comply with study procedures.

For the CPX Sub-study: Subjects who have any contraindications to CPX and are not capable of performing CPX per investigator's assessment should not be registered in the CPX Sub-study.

COAPT CAS study Exclusion Criteria:

1. Subjects must not meet any of the above COAPT RCT exclusion criteria.

.

Sites / Locations

  • University of Alabama at Birmingham
  • Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center
  • Scottsdale Healthcare Hospitals
  • Scripps Green Hospital
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
  • El Camino Hospital
  • University California Davis Medical Center
  • Kaiser Permanente - San Francisco Hospital
  • Stanford Hospital and Clinics
  • University of Colorado Hospital
  • Hartford Hospital
  • Yale - New Haven Hospital
  • Medstar Washington Hospital Center
  • Morton Plant Hospital
  • Mount Sinai Medical Center
  • Florida Hospital Orlando
  • Sarasota Memorial Hospital
  • Tallahassee Memorial Hospital
  • Tampa General Hospital
  • Piedmont Hospital Atlanta
  • Emory University Hospital
  • The Queen's Medical Center
  • Northwestern Memorial Hospital
  • Rush University Medical Center
  • Evanston Hospital
  • St. Vincent Heart Center of Indiana
  • Iowa Heart Center
  • University of Kansas Hosp Authority
  • Via Christi
  • St. Joseph's Hospital - Lexington, KY
  • Jewish Hospital
  • Ochsner Clinic Foundation
  • Maine Medical Center
  • University of Maryland Baltimore
  • Tufts Medical Center
  • Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Brigham and Women's Hospital
  • University of Michigan Hospitals
  • Henry Ford Hospital
  • William Beaumont Hospital
  • Abbott Northwestern Hospital
  • University of Minnesota
  • Mayo Foundation for Med Edu And Research
  • Saint Luke's Hospital
  • Barnes Jewish Hospital
  • St. Patrick Hospital
  • Nebraska Heart Institute Heart Hospital
  • Cooper University Hospital
  • Morristown Medical Center
  • North Shore
  • NYU Langone Medical Center
  • Mount Sinai Medical Center
  • Columbia University Medical Center / New York Presbyterian Hospital
  • NYP Weill Cornell Medical Center
  • St. Francis Hospital
  • Carolinas Medical Center
  • Duke University Medical Center
  • Vidant Medical Center
  • The Christ Hospital
  • Cleveland Clinic
  • Ohio State University Medical Center
  • Riverside Methodist Hospital
  • Oklahoma Heart Hospital
  • Providence St. Vincent Medical Center
  • Oregon Health and Science University
  • Hospital of University Pennsylvania
  • Temple University Hospital
  • UPMC Presbyterian
  • Pinnacle Health at Harrisburg Hospital
  • Medical University of South Carolina
  • St. Thomas Hospital
  • Seton Medical Center Austin
  • Baylor Heart and Vascular Hospital
  • UT Southwestern Medical Center
  • Houston Methodist Hospital
  • Memorial Hermann Hospital
  • Intermountain Medical Center
  • University of Virginia
  • Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center
  • Carilion Roanoke Memorial Hospital
  • Swedish Medical Center Cherry Hill Campus
  • St Paul's - Providence Health Care
  • Hamilton Health Sciences
  • St Michael's Hospital
  • Montreal Heart Institute
  • University of Alberta

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Experimental

Arm Label

MitraClip System

Control Group

COAPT CAS Group

Arm Description

Percutaneous mitral valve repair using MitraClip System

Patients with mitral regurgitation managed non-surgically based on standard hospital clinical practice.

Percutaneous mitral valve repair using MitraClip System

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Primary Safety Endpoint - Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Device Related Complications at 12 Months
Percentage of Participants with Freedom from Device related Complications at 12 Months. Composite of Single Leaflet Device Attachment (SLDA), device embolizations, endocarditis requiring surgery, Echocardiography Core Laboratory confirmed mitral stenosis requiring surgery, LVAD implant, heart transplant, and any device related complications requiring non-elective cardiovascular surgery.
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint
Recurrent HF hospitalizations (HFH) through 24 months, analyzed when the last subject completes 12-month follow-up

Secondary Outcome Measures

Recurrent Heart Failure (HF) Hospitalization (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Number of recurrent Heart Failure hospitalization events at 12 months.
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It classifies patients in one of four categories based on their limitations during physical activity: Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity Class II - Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity. Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms Class IV - Severe limitations.
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It classifies patients in one of four categories based on their limitations during physical activity: Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity Class II - Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity. Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms Class IV - Severe limitations.
Quality of Life (QOL) (COAPT CAS Study Analysis) Quality of Life (QoL) as Measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self administered instrument that quantifies physicalfunction, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. with a range of possiblesubscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. The KCCQ tool quantifies thefollowing six (6) distinct domains and two (2) summary scores: KCCQ Symptom Domain, KCCQ Physical FunctionDomain, KCCQ Quality of Life Domain, KCCQ Social Limitation Domain, KCCQ Self-efficacy Domain, KCCQSymptom Stability Domain, Clinical Summary Score and Overall Summary Score. Clinical Summary Scoreincludes total symptom and physical function scores to correspond with NYHA Classification. Overall SummaryScore includes the total symptom, physical function, social limitations and quality of life scores.
Quality of Life (QOL) (COAPT CAS Study Analysis) Quality of Life (QoL) as Measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. The KCCQ tool quantifies the following six (6) distinct domains and two (2) summary scores: KCCQ Symptom Domain, KCCQ Physical Function Domain, KCCQ Quality of Life Domain, KCCQ Social Limitation Domain, KCCQ Self-efficacy Domain, KCCQ Symptom Stability Domain, Clinical Summary Score and Overall Summary Score. Clinical Summary Score includes total symptom and physical function scores to correspond with NYHA Classification. Overall Summary Score includes the total symptom, physical function, social limitations and quality of life scores.
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT Distance or 6MWD) (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
The Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) is a practical simple test that requires a 100-ft hallway but no exerciseequipment or advanced training for technicians. This test measures the distance that a patient can quickly walk ona flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes (the 6MWD). It evaluates the global and integrated responses of allthe systems involved during exercise, including the pulmonary and cardiovascular systems, systemic circulation,peripheral circulation, blood, neuromuscular units, and muscle metabolism. It does not provide specific informationon the function of each of the different organs and systems involved in exercise or the mechanism of exerciselimitation, as is possible with maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The self-paced 6MWT assesses thesubmaximal level of functional capacity.
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT Distance or 6MWD) (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
The Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) is a practical simple test that requires a 100-ft hallway but no exercise equipment or advanced training for technicians. This test measures the distance that a patient can quickly walk on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes (the 6MWD). It evaluates the global and integrated responses of all the systems involved during exercise, including the pulmonary and cardiovascular systems, systemic circulation, peripheral circulation, blood, neuromuscular units, and muscle metabolism. It does not provide specific information on the function of each of the different organs and systems involved in exercise or the mechanism of exercise limitation, as is possible with maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The self-paced 6MWT assesses the submaximal level of functional capacity.
Mitral Regurgitation (MR) Severity (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
MR Severity Grading was done by Quantitative Doppler Echocardiography and subjects were graded as below MR 1+ - Regurgitant Volume < 30 ml, Right ventricular EF <30%, Effective regurgitant orifice area < 20 mm^2 MR2+ - Regurgitant Volume 30-44 ml, Right ventricular EF 30-39%, Effective regurgitant orifice area 20-29 mm^2 MR3+ - Regurgitant Volume 45-59 ml, Right ventricular EF 40-49 %, Effective regurgitant orifice area 30-39 mm^2MR 4+ - Regurgitant Volume >= 60 ml, Right ventricular EF >=50%, Effective regurgitant orifice area >=40 mm^2
Mitral Regurgitation (MR) Severity (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
MR Severity Grading was done by Quantitative Doppler Echocardiography and subjects were graded as below MR 1+ - Regurgitant Volume < 30 ml, Right ventricular EF <30%, Effective regurgitant orifice area < 20 mm^2 MR 2+ - Regurgitant Volume 30-44 ml, Right ventricular EF 30-39%, Effective regurgitant orifice area 20-29 mm^2 MR 3+ - Regurgitant Volume 45-59 ml, Right ventricular EF 40-49 %, Effective regurgitant orifice area 30-39 mm^2 MR 4+ - Regurgitant Volume >= 60 ml, Right ventricular EF >=50%, Effective regurgitant orifice area >=40 mm^2
Major and/or Life Threatening Bleeding (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Major and/or Life Threatening Bleeding (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Major Vascular Complications (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Major Vascular Complications (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Renal Complication With Requirement for Dialysis (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Renal Complication With Requirement for Dialysis (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Stroke (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Stroke (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Myocardial Infarction (MI) (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Myocardial Infarction (MI) (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Death and Primary Cause of Death (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Death and Primary Cause of Death (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Percentage of Patients Free From the Composite of All-cause Death, Stroke, MI, or Non-elective Cardiovascular Surgery for Device Related Complications in the Device Group
The percentage of patients free from the composite endpoint as described above.
Number of Deaths at 12 Months (All Cause Mortality)
Death from any cause mortality at 12months.
Number of Participants With Mitral Regurgitation Severity Grade of 2+ or Lower at 12 Months
MR severity grade of 2+ or lower at 12 months MR Severity Grading was done by Quantitative Doppler Echocardiography and subjects were graded as below MR 1+ - Regurgitant Volume < 30 ml, Right ventricular EF <30%, Effective regurgitant orifice area < 20 mm^2 MR 2+ - Regurgitant Volume 30-44 ml, Right ventricular EF 30-39%, Effective regurgitant orifice area 20-29 mm^2 MR 3+ - Regurgitant Volume 45-59 ml, Right ventricular EF 40-49 %, Effective regurgitant orifice area 30-39 mm^2 MR 4+ - Regurgitant Volume >= 60 ml, Right ventricular EF >=50%, Effective regurgitant orifice area >=40 mm^2
Change in Distance Walked on the 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT Distance or 6MWD)
The 6MWT is a practical simple test that requires a 100-ft hallway but no exercise equipment or advanced training for technicians. This test measures the distance that a patient can quickly walk on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes (the 6MWD). It evaluates the global and integrated responses of all the systems involved during exercise, including the pulmonary and cardiovascular systems, systemic circulation, peripheral circulation, blood, neuromuscular units, and muscle metabolism. It does not provide specific information on the function of each of the different organs and systems involved in exercise or the mechanism of exercise limitation, as is possible with maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The self-paced 6MWT assesses the submaximal level of functional capacity.
Change in Quality of Life (QoL) as Measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
Paired data looking at difference between the baseline Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and 12 month KCCQ score. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. The KCCQ tool quantifies the following six (6) distinct domains and two (2) summary scores: KCCQ Symptom Domain, KCCQ Physical Function Domain, KCCQ Quality of Life Domain, KCCQ Social Limitation Domain, KCCQ Self-efficacy Domain, KCCQ Symptom Stability Domain, Clinical Summary Score and Overall Summary Score. Clinical Summary Score includes total symptom and physical function scores to correspond with NYHA Classification. Overall Summary Score includes the total symptom, physical function, social limitations and quality of life scores.
Change in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)
Paired data comparing the Change in LVEDV at baseline vs 12 months
Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class I/II
NEW YORK HEART ASSOCIATION CLASSIFICATION (NYHA CLASS) Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity. Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Patients are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. Patients are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.
Recurrent Hospitalizations - All Cause
Number of Recurrent Hospitalizations for any cause within 24 months.
Death or HF Hospitalization Within 24 Months (Finkelstein-Schoenfeld Analysis of All-Cause Death or Recurrent HF Hospitalization Through 24 Months)
The win ratio is a useful method for providing an estimate of the treatment effect when composite endpoints are analyzed as the analysis accounts for clinical significance of the outcomes of interest. For example, in the composite of death and recurrent HF hospitalizations through 24 months, subjects in the Device and Control groups were formed into matched pairs, where each pair of subjects was classified into 1 of 5 outcomes scenarios: A. Death in Device group first B. Death in Control group first C. More HF hospitalizations in the Device group (or in the case of a tie, the first HF hospitalization in the Device group occurs first) D. More HF hospitalization in the Control group (or in the case of tie, the first HF hospitalization in the Control group occurs first) E. None of the above In this way, the number of "Winners" in the Device group was NW = NB + ND while the number of "Losers" in the Device group was NL = NA + NC. The "Win Ratio" was then calculated as NW/NL.
Death and Primary Cause of Death (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
The COAPT study is still on-going. Only the Primary and major secondary endpoints have been entered. Rest of the results will be entered when the study ends in July 2024.
Death and Primary Cause of Death (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Death and Primary Cause of Death (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Death and Primary Cause of Death (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Myocardial Infarction (MI) (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Myocardial Infarction (MI) (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Myocardial Infarction (MI) (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Myocardial Infarction (MI) (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Stroke (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Stroke (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Stroke (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Stroke (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Recurrent Heart Failure (HF) Hospitalization (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Recurrent Heart Failure (HF) Hospitalization (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Recurrent Heart Failure (HF) Hospitalization (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Recurrent Heart Failure (HF) Hospitalization (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Kaplan-Meier Freedom From All-cause Mortality
Death from any cause within 24 months - no of events

Full Information

First Posted
June 20, 2012
Last Updated
September 21, 2022
Sponsor
Abbott Medical Devices
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01626079
Brief Title
Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients With Functional Mitral Regurgitation (The COAPT Trial) and COAPT CAS
Acronym
COAPT
Official Title
A Clinical Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of the MitraClip® System for the Treatment of Functional Mitral Regurgitation in Symptomatic Heart Failure Subjects (COAPT Recruitment Closed). COAPT CAS (Recruitment Closed)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
August 2012 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Abbott Medical Devices

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of the Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients with Functional Mitral Regurgitation (COAPT) Trial is to confirm the safety and effectiveness of the MitraClip System for the treatment of moderate-to-severe or severe functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) in Symptomatic Heart Failure Subjects who are treated per standard of care and who have been determined by the site's local heart team as not appropriate for mitral valve surgery. This randomized controlled trial will provide the opportunity to strengthen or add labeling claims regarding safety and clinical benefits of the MitraClip System for symptomatic heart failure patients with moderate-to-severe or severe functional mitral regurgitation. Approximately 610 subjects will be randomized at up to 100 investigational sites with approximately 305 subjects targeted to receive the study device. COAPT study completed recruiting subjects in June 2017. As part of the COAPT trial, a subset of patients will be registered in the cardiopulmonary exercise (CPX) sub-study. The objective of this sub-study is to evaluate the exercise responses in a sub-cohort of COAPT subjects who receive MitraClip device (Device group) compared to the Control group who do not receive MitraClip device. (Note: the CPX Sub-study subjects will contribute to the analyses of the COAPT primary and secondary endpoints) As an extension of the COAPT RCT trial, COAPT CAS study will be conducted after COAPT enrollment is complete under the same investigational device exemption (IDE(G120024)). The objective of this study is to evaluate the MitraClip® NT System for the treatment of clinically significant functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) in symptomatic heart failure subjects who are treated per standard of care and who have been determined by the site's local heart team as not appropriate for mitral valve surgery. The anticipated Study Completion Date is July 2024. COAPT CAS completed recruiting subjects in March 2019.
Detailed Description
Prospective, randomized, parallel-controlled, multicenter clinical evaluation of the MitraClip device for the treatment of clinically significant functional mitral regurgitation in symptomatic heart failure subjects who are treated per standard of care and who have been determined by the site's local heart team as not appropriate for mitral valve surgery. Eligible subjects will be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to the MitraClip device (Device group) or to no MitraClip device (Control group). As part of the COAPT trial, a subset of patients (at least 50 up to 100 in total) will be registered in the CPX Sub-study, which is designed as a prospective, randomized (1:1 ratio to the MitraClip or no MitraClip device), parallel-controlled, multicenter study registering approximately 50-100 subjects in up to 50 qualified US sites from the COAPT trial. Subjects registered and randomized in the CPX Sub-study will contribute to the total enrollment approximately of 610 subjects in the COAPT trial. Roll-in subjects will not participate in the CPX Sub-study. The COAPT CAS study is designed as a prospective, multicenter, single arm, continued access registry study. A maximum of 800 subjects (anticipated) will be registered from up to 75 sites in the United States. The enrollment will end once pre-market approval (PMA) of the proposed expanded indication of MitraClip System is obtained. Active follow-up of patients will be performed through 12 months with scheduled visits at 30 days and 12 months. The national Trans catheter Valve Therapy Registry (TVT Registry) will be used for data collection through 12 months. Annual follow-up data from 2 years through year 5 post-implant will be obtained by linkage to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) Claims database. COAPT CAS data may be used to support the PMA application of the labeling claims for the treatment of moderate to severe or severe FMR in symptomatic heart failure subjects. This single arm registry will provide valuable new information regarding use of the MitraClip® NT System under more "real world" conditions. COAPT study completed recruiting subjects in June 2017. COAPT CAS completed recruiting subjects in March 2019. A total of 162 subjects were enrolled in the COAPT CAS Group.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Mitral Regurgitation, Mitral Valve Regurgitation, Treatment of Functional Mitral Regurgitation in Symptomatic Heart Failure Subjects, Heart Failure
Keywords
Functional Mitral Regurgitation, Mitral Valve Regurgitation, Symptomatic Heart Failure, Functional MR, MitraClip, Mitral Valve Insufficiency, Cardiopulmonary exercise testing, COAPT CAS, COAPT Continued Access Study, MitraClip NT

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Masking Description
614 in the Randomized Group for COAPT Trial and 162 Subjects in the COAPT CAS Group
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
776 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
MitraClip System
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Percutaneous mitral valve repair using MitraClip System
Arm Title
Control Group
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Patients with mitral regurgitation managed non-surgically based on standard hospital clinical practice.
Arm Title
COAPT CAS Group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Percutaneous mitral valve repair using MitraClip System
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
MitraClip System
Other Intervention Name(s)
MitraClip device, MitraClip
Intervention Description
Percutaneous mitral valve repair using MitraClip System
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Primary Safety Endpoint - Percentage of Participants With Freedom From Device Related Complications at 12 Months
Description
Percentage of Participants with Freedom from Device related Complications at 12 Months. Composite of Single Leaflet Device Attachment (SLDA), device embolizations, endocarditis requiring surgery, Echocardiography Core Laboratory confirmed mitral stenosis requiring surgery, LVAD implant, heart transplant, and any device related complications requiring non-elective cardiovascular surgery.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Primary Effectiveness Endpoint
Description
Recurrent HF hospitalizations (HFH) through 24 months, analyzed when the last subject completes 12-month follow-up
Time Frame
24 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Recurrent Heart Failure (HF) Hospitalization (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Description
Number of recurrent Heart Failure hospitalization events at 12 months.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Description
The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It classifies patients in one of four categories based on their limitations during physical activity: Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity Class II - Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity. Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms Class IV - Severe limitations.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Description
The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It classifies patients in one of four categories based on their limitations during physical activity: Class I - No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity Class II - Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity. Class III - Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms Class IV - Severe limitations.
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Quality of Life (QOL) (COAPT CAS Study Analysis) Quality of Life (QoL) as Measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
Description
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self administered instrument that quantifies physicalfunction, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. with a range of possiblesubscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. The KCCQ tool quantifies thefollowing six (6) distinct domains and two (2) summary scores: KCCQ Symptom Domain, KCCQ Physical FunctionDomain, KCCQ Quality of Life Domain, KCCQ Social Limitation Domain, KCCQ Self-efficacy Domain, KCCQSymptom Stability Domain, Clinical Summary Score and Overall Summary Score. Clinical Summary Scoreincludes total symptom and physical function scores to correspond with NYHA Classification. Overall SummaryScore includes the total symptom, physical function, social limitations and quality of life scores.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Quality of Life (QOL) (COAPT CAS Study Analysis) Quality of Life (QoL) as Measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
Description
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. The KCCQ tool quantifies the following six (6) distinct domains and two (2) summary scores: KCCQ Symptom Domain, KCCQ Physical Function Domain, KCCQ Quality of Life Domain, KCCQ Social Limitation Domain, KCCQ Self-efficacy Domain, KCCQ Symptom Stability Domain, Clinical Summary Score and Overall Summary Score. Clinical Summary Score includes total symptom and physical function scores to correspond with NYHA Classification. Overall Summary Score includes the total symptom, physical function, social limitations and quality of life scores.
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT Distance or 6MWD) (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Description
The Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) is a practical simple test that requires a 100-ft hallway but no exerciseequipment or advanced training for technicians. This test measures the distance that a patient can quickly walk ona flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes (the 6MWD). It evaluates the global and integrated responses of allthe systems involved during exercise, including the pulmonary and cardiovascular systems, systemic circulation,peripheral circulation, blood, neuromuscular units, and muscle metabolism. It does not provide specific informationon the function of each of the different organs and systems involved in exercise or the mechanism of exerciselimitation, as is possible with maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The self-paced 6MWT assesses thesubmaximal level of functional capacity.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT Distance or 6MWD) (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Description
The Six Minute Walk Test (6MWT) is a practical simple test that requires a 100-ft hallway but no exercise equipment or advanced training for technicians. This test measures the distance that a patient can quickly walk on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes (the 6MWD). It evaluates the global and integrated responses of all the systems involved during exercise, including the pulmonary and cardiovascular systems, systemic circulation, peripheral circulation, blood, neuromuscular units, and muscle metabolism. It does not provide specific information on the function of each of the different organs and systems involved in exercise or the mechanism of exercise limitation, as is possible with maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The self-paced 6MWT assesses the submaximal level of functional capacity.
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Mitral Regurgitation (MR) Severity (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Description
MR Severity Grading was done by Quantitative Doppler Echocardiography and subjects were graded as below MR 1+ - Regurgitant Volume < 30 ml, Right ventricular EF <30%, Effective regurgitant orifice area < 20 mm^2 MR2+ - Regurgitant Volume 30-44 ml, Right ventricular EF 30-39%, Effective regurgitant orifice area 20-29 mm^2 MR3+ - Regurgitant Volume 45-59 ml, Right ventricular EF 40-49 %, Effective regurgitant orifice area 30-39 mm^2MR 4+ - Regurgitant Volume >= 60 ml, Right ventricular EF >=50%, Effective regurgitant orifice area >=40 mm^2
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Mitral Regurgitation (MR) Severity (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Description
MR Severity Grading was done by Quantitative Doppler Echocardiography and subjects were graded as below MR 1+ - Regurgitant Volume < 30 ml, Right ventricular EF <30%, Effective regurgitant orifice area < 20 mm^2 MR 2+ - Regurgitant Volume 30-44 ml, Right ventricular EF 30-39%, Effective regurgitant orifice area 20-29 mm^2 MR 3+ - Regurgitant Volume 45-59 ml, Right ventricular EF 40-49 %, Effective regurgitant orifice area 30-39 mm^2 MR 4+ - Regurgitant Volume >= 60 ml, Right ventricular EF >=50%, Effective regurgitant orifice area >=40 mm^2
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Major and/or Life Threatening Bleeding (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Major and/or Life Threatening Bleeding (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Major Vascular Complications (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Major Vascular Complications (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Renal Complication With Requirement for Dialysis (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Renal Complication With Requirement for Dialysis (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Transient Ischemic Attack (TIA) (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Stroke (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Stroke (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Myocardial Infarction (MI) (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Myocardial Infarction (MI) (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Death and Primary Cause of Death (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Death and Primary Cause of Death (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Percentage of Patients Free From the Composite of All-cause Death, Stroke, MI, or Non-elective Cardiovascular Surgery for Device Related Complications in the Device Group
Description
The percentage of patients free from the composite endpoint as described above.
Time Frame
30 days post-procedure in the Device group
Title
Number of Deaths at 12 Months (All Cause Mortality)
Description
Death from any cause mortality at 12months.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Number of Participants With Mitral Regurgitation Severity Grade of 2+ or Lower at 12 Months
Description
MR severity grade of 2+ or lower at 12 months MR Severity Grading was done by Quantitative Doppler Echocardiography and subjects were graded as below MR 1+ - Regurgitant Volume < 30 ml, Right ventricular EF <30%, Effective regurgitant orifice area < 20 mm^2 MR 2+ - Regurgitant Volume 30-44 ml, Right ventricular EF 30-39%, Effective regurgitant orifice area 20-29 mm^2 MR 3+ - Regurgitant Volume 45-59 ml, Right ventricular EF 40-49 %, Effective regurgitant orifice area 30-39 mm^2 MR 4+ - Regurgitant Volume >= 60 ml, Right ventricular EF >=50%, Effective regurgitant orifice area >=40 mm^2
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Change in Distance Walked on the 6 Minute Walk Test (6MWT Distance or 6MWD)
Description
The 6MWT is a practical simple test that requires a 100-ft hallway but no exercise equipment or advanced training for technicians. This test measures the distance that a patient can quickly walk on a flat, hard surface in a period of 6 minutes (the 6MWD). It evaluates the global and integrated responses of all the systems involved during exercise, including the pulmonary and cardiovascular systems, systemic circulation, peripheral circulation, blood, neuromuscular units, and muscle metabolism. It does not provide specific information on the function of each of the different organs and systems involved in exercise or the mechanism of exercise limitation, as is possible with maximal cardiopulmonary exercise testing. The self-paced 6MWT assesses the submaximal level of functional capacity.
Time Frame
12 months over baseline
Title
Change in Quality of Life (QoL) as Measured by the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ)
Description
Paired data looking at difference between the baseline Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and 12 month KCCQ score. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. The KCCQ tool quantifies the following six (6) distinct domains and two (2) summary scores: KCCQ Symptom Domain, KCCQ Physical Function Domain, KCCQ Quality of Life Domain, KCCQ Social Limitation Domain, KCCQ Self-efficacy Domain, KCCQ Symptom Stability Domain, Clinical Summary Score and Overall Summary Score. Clinical Summary Score includes total symptom and physical function scores to correspond with NYHA Classification. Overall Summary Score includes the total symptom, physical function, social limitations and quality of life scores.
Time Frame
12 months over baseline
Title
Change in Left Ventricular End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)
Description
Paired data comparing the Change in LVEDV at baseline vs 12 months
Time Frame
12 months over baseline
Title
Number of Participants With New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class I/II
Description
NEW YORK HEART ASSOCIATION CLASSIFICATION (NYHA CLASS) Class I: Patients with cardiac disease but without resulting limitations of physical activity. Class II: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in slight limitation of physical activity. Patients are comfortable at rest. Ordinary physical activity results in fatigue, palpitation, dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class III: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in marked limitation of physical activity. Patients are comfortable at rest. Less than ordinary physical activity causes fatigue, palpitation dyspnea, or anginal pain. Class IV: Patients with cardiac disease resulting in inability to carry on any physical activity without discomfort. Symptoms of cardiac insufficiency or of the anginal syndrome may be present even at rest. If any physical activity is undertaken, discomfort is increased.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Recurrent Hospitalizations - All Cause
Description
Number of Recurrent Hospitalizations for any cause within 24 months.
Time Frame
24 Months
Title
Death or HF Hospitalization Within 24 Months (Finkelstein-Schoenfeld Analysis of All-Cause Death or Recurrent HF Hospitalization Through 24 Months)
Description
The win ratio is a useful method for providing an estimate of the treatment effect when composite endpoints are analyzed as the analysis accounts for clinical significance of the outcomes of interest. For example, in the composite of death and recurrent HF hospitalizations through 24 months, subjects in the Device and Control groups were formed into matched pairs, where each pair of subjects was classified into 1 of 5 outcomes scenarios: A. Death in Device group first B. Death in Control group first C. More HF hospitalizations in the Device group (or in the case of a tie, the first HF hospitalization in the Device group occurs first) D. More HF hospitalization in the Control group (or in the case of tie, the first HF hospitalization in the Control group occurs first) E. None of the above In this way, the number of "Winners" in the Device group was NW = NB + ND while the number of "Losers" in the Device group was NL = NA + NC. The "Win Ratio" was then calculated as NW/NL.
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Death and Primary Cause of Death (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Description
The COAPT study is still on-going. Only the Primary and major secondary endpoints have been entered. Rest of the results will be entered when the study ends in July 2024.
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Death and Primary Cause of Death (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Death and Primary Cause of Death (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Death and Primary Cause of Death (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Myocardial Infarction (MI) (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Myocardial Infarction (MI) (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Myocardial Infarction (MI) (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Myocardial Infarction (MI) (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Stroke (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Stroke (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Stroke (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Stroke (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Recurrent Heart Failure (HF) Hospitalization (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Recurrent Heart Failure (HF) Hospitalization (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Recurrent Heart Failure (HF) Hospitalization (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Recurrent Heart Failure (HF) Hospitalization (COAPT CAS Study Analysis)
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Kaplan-Meier Freedom From All-cause Mortality
Description
Death from any cause within 24 months - no of events
Time Frame
24 months
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Device or Procedure-Related Adverse Events
Description
Device or procedure-related adverse events are defined as adverse events that are adjudicated by the Clinical Events Committee as possibly, probably or definitely device and/or procedure-related, regardless of the temporal relationship to the MitraClip procedure. Device or procedure-related adverse events will be broken down into those that occur within 30 days of the procedure and those that occur after 30 days of the procedure. Examples of device-related adverse events are: myocardial perforation, Single Leaflet Device Attachment, embolization of the MitraClip device or MitraClip System components, iatrogenic atrial septal defect, mitral valve stenosis, need for mitral valve replacement instead of repair due at least in part to the MitraClip procedure or the presence of the MitraClip device.
Time Frame
Within and after 30 days of the procedure
Title
Implant Rate
Description
Defined as the rate of successful delivery and deployment of the MitraClip device(s) with echocardiographic evidence of leaflet approximation and retrieval of the delivery catheter
Time Frame
Day 0
Title
Device Procedure Time
Description
Defined as the time elapsed from the start of the transseptal procedure to the time the Steerable Guide Catheter is removed
Time Frame
Day 0
Title
Total Procedure Time
Description
Defined as the time elapsed from the first of any of the following: intravascular catheter placement, anesthesia or sedation, or transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE), to the removal of the last catheter and TEE
Time Frame
Day 0
Title
Device Time
Description
Defined as the time the Steerable Guide Catheter is placed in the intra-atrial septum until the time the MitraClip Delivery System (CDS) is retracted into the Steerable Guide Catheter
Time Frame
Day 0
Title
Fluoroscopy Duration
Description
Defined as the duration of exposure to fluoroscopy during the MitraClip procedure
Time Frame
Day 0
Title
MR Severity Grade
Description
MR Severity Grading was done by Quantitative Doppler Echocardiography and subjects were graded as below MR 1+ - Regurgitant Volume < 30 ml, Right ventricular EF <30%, Effective regurgitant orifice area < 20 mm^2 MR 2+ - Regurgitant Volume 30-44 ml, Right ventricular EF 30-39%, Effective regurgitant orifice area 20-29 mm^2 MR 3+ - Regurgitant Volume 45-59 ml, Right ventricular EF 40-49 %, Effective regurgitant orifice area 30-39 mm^2 MR 4+ - Regurgitant Volume >= 60 ml, Right ventricular EF >=50%, Effective regurgitant orifice area >=40 mm^2
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
MR Severity Grade
Description
MR Severity Grading was done by Quantitative Doppler Echocardiography and subjects were graded as below MR 1+ - Regurgitant Volume < 30 ml, Right ventricular EF <30%, Effective regurgitant orifice area < 20 mm^2 MR 2+ - Regurgitant Volume 30-44 ml, Right ventricular EF 30-39%, Effective regurgitant orifice area 20-29 mm^2 MR 3+ - Regurgitant Volume 45-59 ml, Right ventricular EF 40-49 %, Effective regurgitant orifice area 30-39 mm^2 MR 4+ - Regurgitant Volume >= 60 ml, Right ventricular EF >=50%, Effective regurgitant orifice area >=40 mm^2
Time Frame
At discharge (or 30 days if discharge echocardiogram is not available)
Title
MR Severity Grade
Description
MR Severity Grading was done by Quantitative Doppler Echocardiography and subjects were graded as below MR 1+ - Regurgitant Volume < 30 ml, Right ventricular EF <30%, Effective regurgitant orifice area < 20 mm^2 MR 2+ - Regurgitant Volume 30-44 ml, Right ventricular EF 30-39%, Effective regurgitant orifice area 20-29 mm^2 MR 3+ - Regurgitant Volume 45-59 ml, Right ventricular EF 40-49 %, Effective regurgitant orifice area 30-39 mm^2 MR 4+ - Regurgitant Volume >= 60 ml, Right ventricular EF >=50%, Effective regurgitant orifice area >=40 mm^2
Time Frame
6 months
Title
MR Severity Grade
Description
MR Severity Grading was done by Quantitative Doppler Echocardiography and subjects were graded as below MR 1+ - Regurgitant Volume < 30 ml, Right ventricular EF <30%, Effective regurgitant orifice area < 20 mm^2 MR 2+ - Regurgitant Volume 30-44 ml, Right ventricular EF 30-39%, Effective regurgitant orifice area 20-29 mm^2 MR 3+ - Regurgitant Volume 45-59 ml, Right ventricular EF 40-49 %, Effective regurgitant orifice area 30-39 mm^2 MR 4+ - Regurgitant Volume >= 60 ml, Right ventricular EF >=50%, Effective regurgitant orifice area >=40 mm^2
Time Frame
12 months
Title
MR Severity Grade
Description
MR Severity Grading was done by Quantitative Doppler Echocardiography and subjects were graded as below MR 1+ - Regurgitant Volume < 30 ml, Right ventricular EF <30%, Effective regurgitant orifice area < 20 mm^2 MR 2+ - Regurgitant Volume 30-44 ml, Right ventricular EF 30-39%, Effective regurgitant orifice area 20-29 mm^2 MR 3+ - Regurgitant Volume 45-59 ml, Right ventricular EF 40-49 %, Effective regurgitant orifice area 30-39 mm^2 MR 4+ - Regurgitant Volume >= 60 ml, Right ventricular EF >=50%, Effective regurgitant orifice area >=40 mm^2
Time Frame
24 months
Title
MR Severity Grade
Description
MR Severity Grading was done by Quantitative Doppler Echocardiography and subjects were graded as below MR 1+ - Regurgitant Volume < 30 ml, Right ventricular EF <30%, Effective regurgitant orifice area < 20 mm^2 MR2+ - Regurgitant Volume 30-44 ml, Right ventricular EF 30-39%, Effective regurgitant orifice area 20-29 mm^2 MR3+ - Regurgitant Volume 45-59 ml, Right ventricular EF 40-49 %, Effective regurgitant orifice area 30-39 mm^2MR 4+ - Regurgitant Volume >= 60 ml, Right ventricular EF >=50%, Effective regurgitant orifice area >=40 mm^2
Time Frame
3 years
Title
MR Severity Grade
Time Frame
4 years
Title
MR Severity Grade
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Effective Regurgitant Orifice Area
Description
Effective Regurgitant Orifice area is defined as = Regurgitant flow / Regurgitant velocity
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Effective Regurgitant Orifice Area
Description
Effective Regurgitant Orifice area is defined as = Regurgitant flow / Regurgitant velocity
Time Frame
At discharge (or 30 days if discharge echocardiogram is not available)
Title
Effective Regurgitant Orifice Area
Description
Effective Regurgitant Orifice area is defined as = Regurgitant flow / Regurgitant velocity
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Effective Regurgitant Orifice Area
Description
Effective Regurgitant Orifice area is defined as = Regurgitant flow / Regurgitant velocity
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Effective Regurgitant Orifice Area
Description
Effective Regurgitant Orifice area is defined as = Regurgitant flow / Regurgitant velocity
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Effective Regurgitant Orifice Area
Description
Effective Regurgitant Orifice area is defined as = Regurgitant flow / Regurgitant velocity
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Effective Regurgitant Orifice Area
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Effective Regurgitant Orifice Area
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Regurgitant Volume
Description
Regurgitant Volume is calculated by subtracting the inflow volume across the mitral valve during diastole from the Left Ventricular Outflow Tract (LVOT) stroke volume during systole.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Regurgitant Volume
Description
Regurgitant Volume is calculated by subtracting the inflow volume across the mitral valve during diastole from the Left Ventricular Outflow Tract (LVOT) stroke volume during systole.
Time Frame
At discharge (or 30 days if discharge echocardiogram is not available)
Title
Regurgitant Volume
Description
Regurgitant Volume is calculated by subtracting the inflow volume across the mitral valve during diastole from the Left Ventricular Outflow Tract (LVOT) stroke volume during systole.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Regurgitant Volume
Description
Regurgitant Volume is calculated by subtracting the inflow volume across the mitral valve during diastole from the Left Ventricular Outflow Tract (LVOT) stroke volume during systole.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Regurgitant Volume
Description
Regurgitant Volume is calculated by subtracting the inflow volume across the mitral valve during diastole from the Left Ventricular Outflow Tract (LVOT) stroke volume during systole.
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Regurgitant Volume
Description
Regurgitant Volume is calculated by subtracting the inflow volume across the mitral valve during diastole from theLeft Ventricular Outflow Tract (LVOT) stroke volume during systole.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Regurgitant Volume
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Regurgitant Volume
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Regurgitant Fraction
Description
Regurgitant fraction is the percentage of blood that regurgitates back through the aortic valve to the left ventricle due to aortic insufficiency, or through the mitral valve to the atrium due to mitral insufficiency.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Regurgitant Fraction
Description
Regurgitant fraction is the percentage of blood that regurgitates back through the aortic valve to the left ventricle due to aortic insufficiency, or through the mitral valve to the atrium due to mitral insufficiency.
Time Frame
At discharge (or 30 days if discharge echocardiogram is not available)
Title
Regurgitant Fraction
Description
Regurgitant fraction is the percentage of blood that regurgitates back through the aortic valve to the left ventricle due to aortic insufficiency, or through the mitral valve to the atrium due to mitral insufficiency.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Regurgitant Fraction
Description
Regurgitant fraction is the percentage of blood that regurgitates back through the aortic valve to the left ventricle due to aortic insufficiency, or through the mitral valve to the atrium due to mitral insufficiency.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Regurgitant Fraction
Description
Regurgitant fraction is the percentage of blood that regurgitates back through the aortic valve to the left ventricle due to aortic insufficiency, or through the mitral valve to the atrium due to mitral insufficiency.
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Regurgitant Fraction
Description
Regurgitant fraction is the percentage of blood that regurgitates back through the aortic valve to the left ventricledue to aortic insufficiency, or through the mitral valve to the atrium due to mitral insufficiency.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Regurgitant Fraction
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Regurgitant Fraction
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Left Ventricle End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)
Description
Left Ventricle End-diastolic volume is the amount of blood that is in the left ventricle before the heart contracts.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Left Ventricle End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)
Description
Left Ventricle End-diastolic volume is the amount of blood that is in the left ventricle before the heart contracts.
Time Frame
At discharge (or 30 days if discharge echocardiogram is not available)
Title
Left Ventricle End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)
Description
Left Ventricle End-diastolic volume is the amount of blood that is in the left ventricle before the heart contracts.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Left Ventricle End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)
Description
Left Ventricle End-diastolic volume is the amount of blood that is in the left ventricle before the heart contracts.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Left Ventricle End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)
Description
Left Ventricle End-diastolic volume is the amount of blood that is in the left ventricle before the heart contracts.
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Left Ventricle End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)
Description
Left Ventricle End-diastolic volume is the amount of blood that is in the left ventricle before the heart contracts.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Left Ventricle End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Left Ventricle End Diastolic Volume (LVEDV)
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV)
Description
Left Ventricular End-systolic volume (LVESV) is the volume of blood in the left ventricle at the end of contraction, or systole, and the beginning of filling, or diastole. LVESV is the lowest volume of blood in the left ventricle at any point in the cardiac cycle.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV)
Description
Left Ventricular End-systolic volume (LVESV) is the volume of blood in the left ventricle at the end of contraction, or systole, and the beginning of filling, or diastole. LVESV is the lowest volume of blood in the left ventricle at any point in the cardiac cycle.
Time Frame
At discharge (or 30 days if discharge echocardiogram is not available)
Title
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV)
Description
Left Ventricular End-systolic volume (LVESV) is the volume of blood in the left ventricle at the end of contraction, or systole, and the beginning of filling, or diastole. LVESV is the lowest volume of blood in the left ventricle at any point in the cardiac cycle.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV)
Description
Left Ventricular End-systolic volume (LVESV) is the volume of blood in the left ventricle at the end of contraction, or systole, and the beginning of filling, or diastole. LVESV is the lowest volume of blood in the left ventricle at any point in the cardiac cycle.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV)
Description
Left Ventricular End-systolic volume (LVESV) is the volume of blood in the left ventricle at the end of contraction, or systole, and the beginning of filling, or diastole. LVESV is the lowest volume of blood in the left ventricle at any point in the cardiac cycle.
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV)
Description
Left Ventricular End-systolic volume (LVESV) is the volume of blood in the left ventricle at the end of contraction,or systole, and the beginning of filling, or diastole. LVESV is the lowest volume of blood in the left ventricle at anypoint in the cardiac cycle.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV)
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Left Ventricular End Systolic Volume (LVESV)
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD)
Time Frame
At discharge (or 30 days if discharge echocardiogram is not available)
Title
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD)
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD)
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD)
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD)
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD)
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Left Ventricular End Diastolic Dimension (LVEDD)
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD)
Time Frame
At discharge (or 30 days if discharge echocardiogram is not available)
Title
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD)
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD)
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD)
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD)
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD)
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD)
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Time Frame
At discharge (or 30 days if discharge echocardiogram is not available)
Title
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF)
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure (RVSP)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure (RVSP)
Time Frame
At discharge (or 30 days if discharge echocardiogram is not available)
Title
Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure (RVSP)
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure (RVSP)
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure (RVSP)
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure (RVSP)
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure (RVSP)
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure (RVSP)
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Mitral Valve Area
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Mitral Valve Area
Time Frame
At discharge (or 30 days if discharge echocardiogram is not available)
Title
Mitral Valve Area
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Mitral Valve Area
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Mitral Valve Area
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Mitral Valve Area
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Mitral Valve Area
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Mitral Valve Area
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Mean Mitral Valve Gradient
Description
The normal area of the mitral valve orifice is about 4-6 cm2 when the mitral valve area goes below 2 cm2, the valve causes an impediment to the flow of blood into the left ventricle, creating a pressure gradient (mitral valve gradient) across the mitral valve. This gradient may increase by the rise in heart rate or cardiac output.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Mean Mitral Valve Gradient
Description
The normal area of the mitral valve orifice is about 4-6 cm2 when the mitral valve area goes below 2 cm2, the valve causes an impediment to the flow of blood into the left ventricle, creating a pressure gradient (mitral valve gradient) across the mitral valve. This gradient may increase by the rise in heart rate or cardiac output.
Time Frame
At discharge (or 30 days if discharge echocardiogram is not available)
Title
Mean Mitral Valve Gradient
Description
The normal area of the mitral valve orifice is about 4-6 cm2 when the mitral valve area goes below 2 cm2, the valve causes an impediment to the flow of blood into the left ventricle, creating a pressure gradient (mitral valve gradient) across the mitral valve. This gradient may increase by the rise in heart rate or cardiac output.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Mean Mitral Valve Gradient
Description
The normal area of the mitral valve orifice is about 4-6 cm2 when the mitral valve area goes below 2 cm2, the valve causes an impediment to the flow of blood into the left ventricle, creating a pressure gradient (mitral valve gradient) across the mitral valve. This gradient may increase by the rise in heart rate or cardiac output.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Mean Mitral Valve Gradient
Description
The normal area of the mitral valve orifice is about 4-6 cm2 when the mitral valve area goes below 2 cm2, the valve causes an impediment to the flow of blood into the left ventricle, creating a pressure gradient (mitral valve gradient) across the mitral valve. This gradient may increase by the rise in heart rate or cardiac output.
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Mean Mitral Valve Gradient
Description
The normal area of the mitral valve orifice is about 4-6 cm2 when the mitral valve area goes below 2 cm2, thevalve causes an impediment to the flow of blood into the left ventricle, creating a pressure gradient (mitral valvegradient) across the mitral valve. This gradient may increase by the rise in heart rate or cardiac output.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Mean Mitral Valve Gradient
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Mean Mitral Valve Gradient
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Systolic Anterior Motion of the Mitral Valve (Present or Absent)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Systolic Anterior Motion of the Mitral Valve (Present or Absent)
Time Frame
At discharge (or 30 days if discharge echocardiogram is not available)
Title
Systolic Anterior Motion of the Mitral Valve (Present or Absent)
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Systolic Anterior Motion of the Mitral Valve (Present or Absent)
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Systolic Anterior Motion of the Mitral Valve (Present or Absent)
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Systolic Anterior Motion of the Mitral Valve (Present or Absent)
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Systolic Anterior Motion of the Mitral Valve (Present or Absent)
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Systolic Anterior Motion of the Mitral Valve (Present or Absent)
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Cardiac Output
Description
The amount of blood the heart pumps through the circulatory system in a minute.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Cardiac Output
Description
The amount of blood the heart pumps through the circulatory system in a minute.
Time Frame
At discharge (or 30 days if discharge echocardiogram is not available)
Title
Cardiac Output
Description
The amount of blood the heart pumps through the circulatory system in a minute.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Cardiac Output
Description
The amount of blood the heart pumps through the circulatory system in a minute.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Cardiac Output
Description
The amount of blood the heart pumps through the circulatory system in a minute.
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Cardiac Output
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Cardiac Output
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Cardiac Output
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Forward Stroke Volume
Description
Stroke volume is the amount of blood ejected from the ventricle with each cardiac cycle. It can be readily calculated by subtracting the end-systolic volume from the end-diastolic volume.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Forward Stroke Volume
Description
Stroke volume is the amount of blood ejected from the ventricle with each cardiac cycle. It can be readily calculated by subtracting the end-systolic volume from the end-diastolic volume.
Time Frame
At discharge (or 30 days if discharge echocardiogram is not available)
Title
Forward Stroke Volume
Description
Stroke volume is the amount of blood ejected from the ventricle with each cardiac cycle. It can be readily calculated by subtracting the end-systolic volume from the end-diastolic volume.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Forward Stroke Volume
Description
Stroke volume is the amount of blood ejected from the ventricle with each cardiac cycle. It can be readily calculated by subtracting the end-systolic volume from the end-diastolic volume.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Forward Stroke Volume
Description
Stroke volume is the amount of blood ejected from the ventricle with each cardiac cycle. It can be readily calculated by subtracting the end-systolic volume from the end-diastolic volume.
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Forward Stroke Volume
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Forward Stroke Volume
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Forward Stroke Volume
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Kaplan-Meier Freedom From the Components of the Primary Safety Composite
Description
Freedom from the components of the primary safety composite of device related complications including Single Leaflet Device Attachment (SLDA), device embolizations, endocarditis requiring surgery, Echocardiography Core Laboratory confirmed mitral stenosis requiring surgery, LVAD implant, heart transplant, or any device related complications requiring non-elective cardiovascular surgery at 12 months will be the primary measure of safety.
Time Frame
12 months in Device group
Title
Kaplan-Meier Freedom From the Components of the Primary Safety Composite
Description
Freedom from the components of the primary safety composite of device related complications including Single Leaflet Device Attachment (SLDA), device embolizations, endocarditis requiring surgery, Echocardiography Core Laboratory confirmed mitral stenosis requiring surgery, LVAD implant, heart transplant, or any device related complications requiring non-elective cardiovascular surgery at 12 months will be the primary measure of safety.
Time Frame
24 months in Device group
Title
Kaplan-Meier Freedom From the Components of the Primary Safety Composite
Description
Freedom from the components of the primary safety composite of device related complications including Single Leaflet Device Attachment (SLDA), device embolizations, endocarditis requiring surgery, Echocardiography Core Laboratory confirmed mitral stenosis requiring surgery, LVAD implant, heart transplant, or any device related complications requiring non-elective cardiovascular surgery at 12 months will be the primary measure of safety.
Time Frame
3 years in Device group
Title
Kaplan-Meier Freedom From the Components of the Primary Safety Composite
Time Frame
4 years in Device group
Title
Kaplan-Meier Freedom From the Components of the Primary Safety Composite
Time Frame
5 years in Device group
Title
Kaplan-Meier Freedom From the Primary Safety Composite
Description
Freedom from the primary safety composite of device related complications including Single Leaflet Device Attachment (SLDA), device embolizations, endocarditis requiring surgery, Echocardiography Core Laboratory confirmed mitral stenosis requiring surgery, LVAD implant, heart transplant, or any device related complications requiring non-elective cardiovascular surgery at 12 months will be the primary measure of safety.
Time Frame
24 months in Device group
Title
Kaplan-Meier Freedom From the Primary Safety Composite
Description
Freedom from the primary safety composite of device related complications including Single Leaflet DeviceAttachment (SLDA), device embolizations, endocarditis requiring surgery, Echocardiography Core Laboratoryconfirmed mitral stenosis requiring surgery, LVAD implant, heart transplant, or any device related complicationsrequiring non-elective cardiovascular surgery at 12 months will be the primary measure of safety.
Time Frame
3 years in Device group
Title
Kaplan-Meier Freedom From the Primary Safety Composite
Time Frame
4 years in Device group
Title
Kaplan-Meier Freedom From the Primary Safety Composite
Time Frame
5 years in Device group
Title
Kaplan-Meier Freedom From All-cause Mortality
Description
Kaplan-Meier survival rate for all cause mortality at 24 months
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Kaplan-Meier Freedom From All-cause Mortality
Description
Kaplan-Meier survival rate for all cause mortality at 36 months
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Kaplan-Meier Freedom From All-cause Mortality
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Kaplan-Meier Freedom From All-cause Mortality
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Kaplan-Meier Freedom From Cardiovascular Mortality
Description
Kaplan-Meier survival rate for Cardiovascular mortality.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Kaplan-Meier Freedom From Cardiovascular Mortality
Description
Kaplan-Meier survival rate for Cardiovascular mortality.
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Kaplan-Meier Freedom From Cardiovascular Mortality
Description
Kaplan-Meier survival rate for Cardiovascular mortality.
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Kaplan-Meier Freedom From Cardiovascular Mortality
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Kaplan-Meier Freedom From Cardiovascular Mortality
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Kaplan-Meier Freedom From the First HF Related Hospitalization
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Kaplan-Meier Freedom From the First HF Related Hospitalization
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Kaplan-Meier Freedom From the First HF Related Hospitalization
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Kaplan-Meier Freedom From the First HF Related Hospitalization
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Kaplan-Meier Freedom From the First HF Related Hospitalization
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Kaplan-Meier Freedom From the First Cardiovascular Hospitalization
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Kaplan-Meier Freedom From the First Cardiovascular Hospitalization
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Kaplan-Meier Freedom From the First Cardiovascular Hospitalization
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Kaplan-Meier Freedom From the First Cardiovascular Hospitalization
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Kaplan-Meier Freedom From the First Cardiovascular Hospitalization
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Kaplan-Meier Freedom From the First HF Related Hospitalization or All-cause Mortality
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Kaplan-Meier Freedom From the First HF Related Hospitalization or All-cause Mortality
Description
Survival rate from the first HF related hospitalization or all-cause mortality.
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Kaplan-Meier Freedom From the First HF Related Hospitalization or All-cause Mortality
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Kaplan-Meier Freedom From the First HF Related Hospitalization or All-cause Mortality
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Kaplan-Meier Freedom From the First HF Related Hospitalization or All-cause Mortality
Time Frame
5 years
Title
NYHA Functional Class
Description
Measure Description: The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It classifies patients in one of four categories based on their limitations during physical activity: Class I: No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity Class II: Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity Class III: Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms Class IV: Severe limitations
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
NYHA Functional Class
Description
Measure Description: The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It classifies patients in one of four categories based on their limitations during physical activity: Class I: No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity Class II: Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity Class III: Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms Class IV: Severe limitations
Time Frame
30 days
Title
NYHA Functional Class
Description
Measure Description: The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It classifies patients in one of four categories based on their limitations during physical activity: Class I: No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity Class II: Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity Class III: Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms Class IV: Severe limitations
Time Frame
6 months
Title
NYHA Functional Class
Description
Measure Description: The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It classifies patients in one of four categories based on their limitations during physical activity: Class I: No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity Class II: Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity Class III: Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms Class IV: Severe limitations
Time Frame
12 months
Title
NYHA Functional Class
Description
Measure Description: The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification provides a simple way of classifying the extent of heart failure. It classifies patients in one of four categories based on their limitations during physical activity: Class I: No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity Class II: Mild symptoms (mild shortness of breath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity Class III: Marked limitation in activity due to symptoms Class IV: Severe limitations
Time Frame
24 months
Title
NYHA Functional Class
Description
Measure Description: The New York Heart Association (NYHA) Classification provides a simple way of classifyingthe extent of heart failure. It classifies patients in one of four categories based on their limitations during physicalactivity: Class I: No symptoms and no limitation in ordinary physical activity Class II: Mild symptoms (mild shortness ofbreath and/or angina) and slight limitation during ordinary activity Class III: Marked limitation in activity due tosymptoms Class IV: Severe limitations
Time Frame
3 years
Title
NYHA Functional Class
Time Frame
4 years
Title
NYHA Functional Class
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Six-Minute Walk Test Distance (6MWD)
Description
Six-Minute Walk Test is a submaximal exercise test that entails measurement of distance walked over a span of 6 minutes. The 6-minute walk test distance (6 MWD) provides a measure for integrated global response of multiple cardiopulmonary and musculoskeletal systems involved in exercise.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
6MWD
Description
Six-Minute Walk Test is a submaximal exercise test that entails measurement of distance walked over a span of 6 minutes. The 6-minute walk test distance (6 MWD) provides a measure for integrated global response of multiple cardiopulmonary and musculoskeletal systems involved in exercise.
Time Frame
30 days
Title
6MWD
Description
Six-Minute Walk Test is a submaximal exercise test that entails measurement of distance walked over a span of 6 minutes. The 6-minute walk test distance (6 MWD) provides a measure for integrated global response of multiple cardiopulmonary and musculoskeletal systems involved in exercise.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
6MWD
Description
Six-Minute Walk Test is a submaximal exercise test that entails measurement of distance walked over a span of 6 minutes. The 6-minute walk test distance (6 MWD) provides a measure for integrated global response of multiple cardiopulmonary and musculoskeletal systems involved in exercise.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
6MWD
Description
Six-Minute Walk Test is a submaximal exercise test that entails measurement of distance walked over a span of 6 minutes. The 6-minute walk test distance (6 MWD) provides a measure for integrated global response of multiple cardiopulmonary and musculoskeletal systems involved in exercise.
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Change in 6MWD From Baseline
Time Frame
Between baseline and 30 days
Title
Change in 6MWD From Baseline
Time Frame
Between baseline and 6 months
Title
Change in 6MWD From Baseline
Time Frame
Between baseline and 12 months
Title
Change in 6MWD From Baseline
Time Frame
Between baseline and 24 months
Title
Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) QoL Scores
Description
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. The KCCQ tool quantifies the following six (6) distinct domains and two (2) summary scores: KCCQ Symptom Domain, KCCQ Physical Function Domain, KCCQ Quality of Life Domain, KCCQ Social Limitation Domain, KCCQ Self-efficacy Domain, KCCQ Symptom Stability Domain, Clinical Summary Score and Overall Summary Score. Clinical Summary Score includes total symptom and physical function scores to correspond with NYHA Classification. Overall Summary Score includes the total symptom, physical function, social limitations and quality of life scores.
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
KCCQ QoL Scores
Description
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. The KCCQ tool quantifies the following six (6) distinct domains and two (2) summary scores: KCCQ Symptom Domain, KCCQ Physical Function Domain, KCCQ Quality of Life Domain, KCCQ Social Limitation Domain, KCCQ Self-efficacy Domain, KCCQ Symptom Stability Domain, Clinical Summary Score and Overall Summary Score. Clinical Summary Score includes total symptom and physical function scores to correspond with NYHA Classification. Overall Summary Score includes the total symptom, physical function, social limitations and quality of life scores.
Time Frame
30 days
Title
KCCQ QoL Scores
Description
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. The KCCQ tool quantifies the following six (6) distinct domains and two (2) summary scores: KCCQ Symptom Domain, KCCQ Physical Function Domain, KCCQ Quality of Life Domain, KCCQ Social Limitation Domain, KCCQ Self-efficacy Domain, KCCQ Symptom Stability Domain, Clinical Summary Score and Overall Summary Score. Clinical Summary Score includes total symptom and physical function scores to correspond with NYHA Classification. Overall Summary Score includes the total symptom, physical function, social limitations and quality of life scores.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
KCCQ QoL Scores
Description
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. The KCCQ tool quantifies the following six (6) distinct domains and two (2) summary scores: KCCQ Symptom Domain, KCCQ Physical Function Domain, KCCQ Quality of Life Domain, KCCQ Social Limitation Domain, KCCQ Self-efficacy Domain, KCCQ Symptom Stability Domain, Clinical Summary Score and Overall Summary Score. Clinical Summary Score includes total symptom and physical function scores to correspond with NYHA Classification. Overall Summary Score includes the total symptom, physical function, social limitations and quality of life scores.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
KCCQ QoL Scores
Description
The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. The KCCQ tool quantifies the following six (6) distinct domains and two (2) summary scores: KCCQ Symptom Domain, KCCQ Physical Function Domain, KCCQ Quality of Life Domain, KCCQ Social Limitation Domain, KCCQ Self-efficacy Domain, KCCQ Symptom Stability Domain, Clinical Summary Score and Overall Summary Score. Clinical Summary Score includes total symptom and physical function scores to correspond with NYHA Classification. Overall Summary Score includes the total symptom, physical function, social limitations and quality of life scores.
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Change in KCCQ QoL Scores From Baseline
Description
Paired data looking at difference between the baseline Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and 30 days KCCQ score. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. The KCCQ tool quantifies the following six (6) distinct domains and two (2) summary scores: KCCQ Symptom Domain, KCCQ Physical Function Domain, KCCQ Quality of Life Domain, KCCQ Social Limitation Domain, KCCQ Self-efficacy Domain, KCCQ Symptom Stability Domain, Clinical Summary Score and Overall Summary Score. Clinical Summary Score includes total symptom and physical function scores to correspond with NYHA Classification. Overall Summary Score includes the total symptom, physical function, social limitations and quality of life scores.
Time Frame
Between baseline and 30 days
Title
Change in KCCQ QoL Scores From Baseline
Description
Paired data looking at difference between the baseline Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and 6 months KCCQ score. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. The KCCQ tool quantifies the following six (6) distinct domains and two (2) summary scores: KCCQ Symptom Domain, KCCQ Physical Function Domain, KCCQ Quality of Life Domain, KCCQ Social Limitation Domain, KCCQ Self-efficacy Domain, KCCQ Symptom Stability Domain, Clinical Summary Score and Overall Summary Score. Clinical Summary Score includes total symptom and physical function scores to correspond with NYHA Classification. Overall Summary Score includes the total symptom, physical function, social limitations and quality of life scores.
Time Frame
Between baseline and 6 months
Title
Change in KCCQ QoL Scores From Baseline
Description
Paired data looking at difference between the baseline Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and 12 months KCCQ score. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. The KCCQ tool quantifies the following six (6) distinct domains and two (2) summary scores: KCCQ Symptom Domain, KCCQ Physical Function Domain, KCCQ Quality of Life Domain, KCCQ Social Limitation Domain, KCCQ Self-efficacy Domain, KCCQ Symptom Stability Domain, Clinical Summary Score and Overall Summary Score. Clinical Summary Score includes total symptom and physical function scores to correspond with NYHA Classification. Overall Summary Score includes the total symptom, physical function, social limitations and quality of life scores.
Time Frame
Between baseline and 12 months
Title
Change in KCCQ QoL Scores From Baseline
Description
Paired data looking at difference between the baseline Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) and 24 months KCCQ score. The Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire is a 23-item, self-administered instrument that quantifies physical function, symptoms, social function, self-efficacy and knowledge, and quality of life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. The KCCQ tool quantifies the following six (6) distinct domains and two (2) summary scores: KCCQ Symptom Domain, KCCQ Physical Function Domain, KCCQ Quality of Life Domain, KCCQ Social Limitation Domain, KCCQ Self-efficacy Domain, KCCQ Symptom Stability Domain, Clinical Summary Score and Overall Summary Score. Clinical Summary Score includes total symptom and physical function scores to correspond with NYHA Classification. Overall Summary Score includes the total symptom, physical function, social limitations and quality of life scores.
Time Frame
Between baseline and 24 months
Title
SF-36 QoL Scores
Description
The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36) is a very popular instrument for evaluating Health-Related Quality of Life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. There are two distinct concepts measured by the SF-36: a physical dimension, represented by the Physical Component Summary (PCS), and a mental dimension, represented by the Mental Component Summary (MCS).
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
SF-36 QoL Scores
Description
The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36) is a very popular instrument for evaluating Health-Related Quality of Life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. There are two distinct concepts measured by the SF-36: a physical dimension, represented by the Physical Component Summary (PCS), and a mental dimension, represented by the Mental Component Summary (MCS).
Time Frame
30 days
Title
SF-36 QoL Scores
Description
The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36) is a very popular instrument for evaluating Health-Related Quality of Life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. There are two distinct concepts measured by the SF-36: a physical dimension, represented by the Physical Component Summary (PCS), and a mental dimension, represented by the Mental Component Summary (MCS).
Time Frame
6 months
Title
SF-36 QoL Scores
Description
The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36) is a very popular instrument for evaluating Health-Related Quality of Life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. There are two distinct concepts measured by the SF-36: a physical dimension, represented by the Physical Component Summary (PCS), and a mental dimension, represented by the Mental Component Summary (MCS).
Time Frame
12 months
Title
SF-36 QoL Scores
Description
The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36) is a very popular instrument for evaluating Health-Related Quality of Life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. There are two distinct concepts measured by the SF-36: a physical dimension, represented by the Physical Component Summary (PCS), and a mental dimension, represented by the Mental Component Summary (MCS).
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Change in SF-36 QoL Scores From Baseline
Description
Paired data looking at difference between the baseline SF-36 and 30 days SF-36. The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36) is a very popular instrument for evaluating Health-Related Quality of Life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. There are two distinct concepts measured by the SF-36: a physical dimension, represented by the Physical Component Summary (PCS), and a mental dimension, represented by the Mental Component Summary (MCS).
Time Frame
Between baseline and 30 days
Title
Change in SF-36 QoL Scores From Baseline
Description
Paired data looking at difference between the baseline SF-36 and 6 months days SF-36. The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36) is a very popular instrument for evaluating Health-Related Quality of Life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. There are two distinct concepts measured by the SF-36: a physical dimension, represented by the Physical Component Summary (PCS), and a mental dimension, represented by the Mental Component Summary (MCS).
Time Frame
Between baseline and 6 months
Title
Change in SF-36 QoL Scores From Baseline
Description
Paired data looking at difference between the baseline SF-36 and 12 month SF-36. The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36) is a very popular instrument for evaluating Health-Related Quality of Life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. There are two distinct concepts measured by the SF-36: a physical dimension, represented by the Physical Component Summary (PCS), and a mental dimension, represented by the Mental Component Summary (MCS).
Time Frame
Between baseline and 12 months
Title
Change in SF-36 QoL Scores From Baseline
Description
Paired data looking at difference between the baseline SF-36 and 24 months SF-36. The 36-Item Short Form Health Survey questionnaire (SF-36) is a very popular instrument for evaluating Health-Related Quality of Life. with a range of possible subscale scores from 0 to 100, with 100 representing the least burden of symptoms. There are two distinct concepts measured by the SF-36: a physical dimension, represented by the Physical Component Summary (PCS), and a mental dimension, represented by the Mental Component Summary (MCS).
Time Frame
Between baseline and 24 months
Title
Mitral Valve Surgery (Including Type of Surgery), New Use of CRT, New Use of Single or Dual Chamber Pacemaker, Permanent LVAD Implant, Heart Transplant, Additional MitraClip Device Intervention in Device Group
Time Frame
Through 5 years
Title
De Novo MitraClip Device Intervention in Control Group
Time Frame
Through 5 years
Title
Responder Analysis for 6MWD
Description
Where responder is defined as alive and experiencing an improvement of 24 meters and 50 meters (difference in proportion of responders between Device and Control groups)
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Responder Analysis for 6MWD
Description
Where responder is defined as alive and experiencing an improvement of 24 meters and 50 meters (difference in proportion of responders between Device and Control groups)
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Responder Analysis for LVEDV Index
Description
Where responder is defined as alive and experiencing an improvement of 12 ml/m2 (difference in proportion of responders between Device and Control groups)
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Responder Analysis for LVEDV Index
Description
Where responder is defined as alive and experiencing an improvement of 12 ml/m2 (difference in proportion of responders between Device and Control groups)
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Responder Analysis for LVEDV Index
Description
Where responder is defined as alive and experiencing an improvement of 12 ml/m2 (difference in proportion of responders between Device and Control groups)
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Responder Analysis for LVEDV Index
Description
Where responder is defined as alive and experiencing an improvement of 12 ml/m2 (difference in proportion of responders between Device and Control groups)
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Responder Analysis for LVEDV Index
Description
Where responder is defined as alive and experiencing an improvement of 12 ml/m2 (difference in proportion of responders between Device and Control groups)
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Responder Analysis for QoL (KCCQ)
Description
Where responder is defined as alive and experiencing an improvement of 5 points (difference in proportion of responders between Device and Control groups)
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Responder Analysis for QoL (KCCQ)
Description
Where responder is defined as alive and experiencing an improvement of 5 points (difference in proportion of responders between Device and Control groups)
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Each Subscale for QoL (KCCQ)
Description
difference in means between Device and Control groups for the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) for the physical limitation and symptom stability scores.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Each Subscale for QoL (KCCQ)
Description
difference in means between Device and Control groups for the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) for the physical limitation and symptom stability scores.
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Length of Index Hospitalization for MitraClip Procedure (Device Group)
Description
Length of stay in the hospital for the MitraClip Index procedure (device group)
Time Frame
Before MitraClip procedure on day 0
Title
Number of Hospitalizations and Reason for Hospitalization (i.e. Heart Failure, Cardiovascular, Non-cardiovascular)
Description
in each of the Device and Control groups
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Number of Hospitalizations and Reason for Hospitalization (i.e. Heart Failure, Cardiovascular, Non-cardiovascular)
Description
in each of the Device and Control groups
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Number of Days Alive and Out of Hospital
Description
mean no of days alive and out of hospital in both Device and Control groups
Time Frame
From the time of randomization to 12 months
Title
Number of Days Alive and Out of Hospital
Description
mean Number of days alive and out of hospital for the Device and Control groups
Time Frame
From the time of randomization to 24 months
Title
Number of Days Alive and Out of Hospital
Description
Mean Number of days alive and out of hospital for the Device and Control groups
Time Frame
From the time of randomization to 3 Years
Title
Number of Days Alive and Out of Hospital
Description
difference in medians between Device and Control groups
Time Frame
From the time of randomization to 4 Years
Title
Number of Days Alive and Out of Hospital
Description
difference in medians between Device and Control groups
Time Frame
From the time of randomization to 5 Years
Title
Number of Days Hospitalized From the "Treatment" Visit
Description
mean Number of days hospitalized from the "Treatment" visit for the Device and Control groups
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Number of Days Hospitalized From the "Treatment" Visit
Description
mean Number of days hospitalized from the "Treatment" visit for the Device and Control groups
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Number of Days Hospitalized From the "Treatment" Visit
Description
mean Number of days hospitalized from the "Treatment" visit for the Device and Control groups
Time Frame
3 Years
Title
Number of Days Hospitalized From the "Treatment" Visit
Description
difference in medians between Device and Control groups
Time Frame
4 Years
Title
Number of Days Hospitalized From the "Treatment" Visit
Description
difference in medians between Device and Control groups
Time Frame
5 Years
Title
Proportion of Alive Time in Hospital
Description
summarized and compared between Device and Control groups
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Proportion of Alive Time in Hospital
Description
summarized and compared between Device and Control groups
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Proportion of Alive Time in Hospital
Description
summarized and compared between Device and Control groups
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Proportion of Alive Time in Hospital
Description
summarized and compared between Device and Control groups
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Proportion of Alive Time in Hospital
Description
summarized and compared between Device and Control groups
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Proportion of Subjects Living in the Baseline Location
Description
Subjects living in the baseline location include : home, retirement home, nursing facility and other location.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Proportion of Subjects Living in the Baseline Location
Description
Subjects living in the baseline location include : home, retirement home, nursing facility and other location.
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Proportion of Subjects Living in the Baseline Location
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Proportion of Subjects Living in the Baseline Location
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Proportion of Subjects Living in the Baseline Location
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Mitral Valve Replacement Rates
Description
Subjects with mitral valve replacements in the Device and Control groups
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Mitral Valve Replacement Rates
Description
Subjects with mitral valve replacements in the Device and Control groups
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Mitral Valve Replacement Rates
Description
summarized and compared between Device and Control groups
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Mitral Valve Replacement Rates
Description
summarized and compared between Device and Control groups
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Mitral Valve Replacement Rates
Description
summarized and compared between Device and Control groups
Time Frame
5 years
Title
New Onset of Permanent Atrial Fibrillation
Time Frame
12 months
Title
New Onset of Permanent Atrial Fibrillation
Time Frame
24 months
Title
New Onset of Permanent Atrial Fibrillation
Time Frame
3 years
Title
New Onset of Permanent Atrial Fibrillation
Time Frame
4 years
Title
New Onset of Permanent Atrial Fibrillation
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Mitral Stenosis
Description
Defined as a mitral valve orifice area of less than 1.5 cm2 as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Mitral Stenosis
Description
Defined as a mitral valve orifice area of less than 1.5 cm2 as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Mitral Stenosis
Description
Defined as a mitral valve orifice area of less than 1.5 cm2 as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Mitral Stenosis
Description
Defined as a mitral valve orifice area of less than 1.5 cm2 as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Mitral Stenosis
Description
Defined as a mitral valve orifice area of less than 1.5 cm2 as measured by the Echocardiography Core Laboratory
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Clinically Significant Atrial Septal Defect (ASD) That Requires Intervention
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Clinically Significant Atrial Septal Defect (ASD) That Requires Intervention
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Clinically Significant Atrial Septal Defect (ASD) That Requires Intervention
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Clinically Significant Atrial Septal Defect (ASD) That Requires Intervention
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Clinically Significant Atrial Septal Defect (ASD) That Requires Intervention
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Device-related Complications in Device Group Subjects and Control Group Subjects Who Undergo the MitraClip Procedure
Time Frame
Through 5 years
Title
Brain Natriuretic Peptide (BNP) or N-terminal Prohormone of Brain Natriuretic Peptide (NT-proBNP Levels)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
BNP or NT-proBNP Levels
Time Frame
30 days
Title
BNP or NT-proBNP Levels
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Modified Rankin Scale Score
Description
MODIFIED RANKIN SCALE SCORE DESCRIPTIONS: 0- No symptoms at all; 1- No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities; 2- Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance; 3- Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance; 4- Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance; 5- Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention; 6- Dead
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Modified Rankin Scale Score
Description
MODIFIED RANKIN SCALE SCORE DESCRIPTIONS: 0- No symptoms at all; 1- No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities; 2- Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance; 3- Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance; 4- Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance; 5- Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention; 6- Dead
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Modified Rankin Scale Score
Description
MODIFIED RANKIN SCALE SCORE DESCRIPTIONS: 0- No symptoms at all; 1- No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities; 2- Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance; 3- Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance; 4- Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance; 5- Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention; 6- Dead
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Modified Rankin Scale Score
Description
MODIFIED RANKIN SCALE SCORE DESCRIPTIONS: 0- No symptoms at all; 1- No significant disability despite symptoms; able to carry out all usual duties and activities; 2- Slight disability; unable to carry out all previous activities, but able to look after own affairs without assistance; 3- Moderate disability; requiring some help, but able to walk without assistance; 4- Moderately severe disability; unable to walk without assistance and unable to attend to own bodily needs without assistance; 5- Severe disability; bedridden, incontinent and requiring constant nursing care and attention; 6- Dead
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Major Bleeding
Description
Major bleeding is defined as bleeding ≥ Type 3 based on a modified Bleeding Academic Research Consortium (BARC) definition
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Prolonged Ventilation
Description
Defined as pulmonary insufficiency requiring ventilatory support for greater than 48 hours post-catheterization
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Average Dosages of Guideline Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Average Dosages of GDMT
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Average Dosages of GDMT
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Average Dosages of GDMT
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Average Dosages of GDMT
Time Frame
24 months
Title
Average Dosages of GDMT
Time Frame
3 years
Title
Average Dosages of GDMT
Time Frame
4 years
Title
Average Dosages of GDMT
Time Frame
5 years
Title
The Number of Subjects With Changes in GDMT Dosage From Baseline
Time Frame
Between baseline and 30 days
Title
The Number of Subjects With Changes in GDMT Dosage From Baseline to 6 Months
Time Frame
Between baseline and 6 months
Title
The Number of Subjects With Changes in GDMT Dosage From Baseline and 12 Months
Time Frame
Between baseline and 12 months
Title
The Number of Subjects With Changes in GDMT Dosage From Baseline and 24 Months
Time Frame
Between baseline and 24 months
Title
The Number and Reasons for Any Changes in GDMT and GDMT Dosage From Baseline
Time Frame
Between baseline and 3 years
Title
The Number and Reasons for Any Changes in GDMT and GDMT Dosage From Baseline
Time Frame
Between baseline and 4 years
Title
The Number and Reasons for Any Changes in GDMT and GDMT Dosage From Baseline
Time Frame
Between baseline and 5 years
Title
The Number of Subjects With Change in GDMT From Baseline That Result in a Greater Than 100% Increase or Greater Than 50% Decrease in Dose
Time Frame
Between baseline and 30 days
Title
The Number of Subjects With Any Changes in GDMT From Baseline That Result in a Greater Than 100% Increase or Greater Than 50% Decrease in Dose
Time Frame
Between baseline and 6 months
Title
The Number of Subjects With Any Changes in GDMT From Baseline That Result in a Greater Than 100% Increase or Greater Than 50% Decrease in Dose
Time Frame
Between baseline and 12 months
Title
The Number of Subjects With Any Changes in GDMT From Baseline That Result in a Greater Than 100% Increase or Greater Than 50% Decrease in Dose
Time Frame
Between baseline and 24 months
Title
The Number and Reasons for Any Changes in GDMT From Baseline That Result in a Greater Than 100% Increase or Greater Than 50% Decrease in Dose
Time Frame
Between baseline and 3 years
Title
The Number and Reasons for Any Changes in GDMT From Baseline That Result in a Greater Than 100% Increase or Greater Than 50% Decrease in Dose
Time Frame
Between baseline and 4 years
Title
The Number and Reasons for Any Changes in GDMT From Baseline That Result in a Greater Than 100% Increase or Greater Than 50% Decrease in Dose
Time Frame
Between baseline and 5 years
Title
Cardiopulmonary Exercise (CPX) Testing
Description
A substudy endpoint will utilize peak oxygen consumption oxygen uptake (VO2) as a parameter for cardiopulmonary exercise testing on a total of at least 50 and up to 100 subjects. The CPX analysis variables are: Peak VO2 (ml/kg/min) - CPX Sub-study endpoint, descriptive analysis only, not powered for statistical significance Exercise duration (min) Peak workload (watts) Maximum heart rate during exercise (beats/min) Peak VE (l/min) Respiratory Exchange Ratio (RER, VCO2/VO2) VE/VCO2 slope Ventilatory Threshold (ml/kg/min) Borg scale Exercise termination reason Type of exercise (treadmill vs cycling)
Time Frame
Baseline
Title
Cardiopulmonary Exercise (CPX) Testing
Description
A substudy endpoint will utilize peak oxygen consumption oxygen uptake (VO2) as a parameter for cardiopulmonary exercise testing on a total of at least 50 and up to 100 subjects. The CPX analysis variables are: Peak VO2 (ml/kg/min) - CPX Sub-study endpoint, descriptive analysis only, not powered for statistical significance Exercise duration (min) Peak workload (watts) Maximum heart rate during exercise (beats/min) Peak VE (l/min) Respiratory Exchange Ratio (RER, VCO2/VO2) VE/VCO2 slope Ventilatory Threshold (ml/kg/min) Borg scale Exercise termination reason Type of exercise (treadmill vs cycling)
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Cardiopulmonary Exercise (CPX) Testing: Mean Changes in Peak VO2
Description
Mean changes in peak VO2 (ml/kg/min) will be summarized at 12 months from baseline for the subset of patients who complete a CPX test at baseline and 12 months. A comparison of change from baseline between Device and Control groups will be presented. The CPX analysis variables are: Peak VO2 (ml/kg/min) - CPX Sub-study endpoint, descriptive analysis only, not powered for statistical significance Exercise duration (min) Peak workload (watts) Maximum heart rate during exercise (beats/min) Peak VE (l/min) Respiratory Exchange Ratio (RER, VCO2/VO2) VE/VCO2 slope Ventilatory Threshold (ml/kg/min) Borg scale Exercise termination reason Type of exercise (treadmill vs cycling)
Time Frame
Between baseline and 12 months
Title
Health Economic Data
Time Frame
Through 5 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Symptomatic functional MR (≥3+) due to cardiomyopathy of either ischemic or non-ischemic etiology determined by assessment of a qualifying transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) obtained within 90 days and transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) obtained within 180 days prior to subject registration, with MR severity based principally on the TTE study, confirmed by the Echocardiography Core Lab (ECL). The ECL may request a transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) to confirm MR etiology. Note: Functional MR requires the presence of global or regional left ventricular wall motion abnormalities, which are believed to be the primary cause of the MR. If a flail leaflet or other evidence of degenerative MR is present, the subject is not eligible even if global or regional left ventricular systolic dysfunction is present. Note: Qualifying TTE must be obtained after the subject has been stabilized on optimal therapy including Guideline Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT) and at least 30 days after: a greater than 100% increase or greater than 50% decrease in dose of GDMT revascularization and/or implant of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy device (CRT or CRT-D) or reprogramming of an implanted CRT or CRT-D that results in increased biventricular pacing (from <92% to ≥92%) In the judgment of the HF specialist investigator at the site, the subject has been adequately treated per applicable standards, including for coronary artery disease, left ventricular dysfunction, mitral regurgitation and heart failure (e.g., with cardiac resynchronization therapy, revascularization, and/or GDMT). The Eligibility Committee must also concur that the subject has been adequately treated. New York Heart Association (NYHA) Functional Class II, III or ambulatory IV. The Local Site Heart Team (CT surgeon and HF specialist investigators) and the Central Eligibility Committee concur that surgery will not be offered as a treatment option and that medical therapy is the intended therapy for the subject, even if the subject is randomized to the Control group. The subject has had at least one hospitalization for heart failure in the 12 months prior to subject registration and/or a corrected brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) ≥300 pg/ml or corrected n-Terminal pro- brain natriuretic peptide NT-proBNP ≥1500 pg/ml measured within 90 days prior to subject registration ("corrected" refers to a 4% reduction in the BNP or NT-proBNP cutoff for every increase of 1 kg/m2 in BMI above a reference BMI of 20 kg/m2). Note: BNP or NT-proBNP must be obtained after the subject has been stabilized on GDMT and at least 30 days after: a greater than 100% increase or greater than 50% decrease in dose of GDMT revascularization and/or implant of Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy device (CRT or CRT-D) or reprogramming of an implanted CRT or CRT-D that results in increased biventricular pacing (from <92% to ≥92%). Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) is ≥20% and ≤50% within 90 days prior to subject registration, assessed by the site using any one of the following methods: echocardiography, contrast left ventriculography, gated blood pool scan or cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Note: The method must provide a quantitative readout (not a visual assessment). The primary regurgitant jet is non-commissural, and in the opinion of the MitraClip implanting investigator can be successfully be treated by the MitraClip. If a secondary jet exists, it must be considered clinically insignificant. Creatine Kinase-MB (CK-MB) obtained within prior 14 days < local laboratory Upper Limit of Normal (ULN). Transseptal catheterization and femoral vein access is determined to be feasible by the MitraClip implanting investigator. Age 18 years or older. The subject or the subject's legal representative understands and agrees that should he/she be assigned to the Control group, he/she will be treated with medical therapy and conservative management without surgery and without the MitraClip, either domestically or abroad. If the subject would actively contemplate surgery and/or MitraClip if randomized to Control, he/she should not be registered in this trial. The subject or the subject's legal representative has been informed of the nature of the trial and agrees to its provisions, including the possibility of randomization to the Control group and returning for all required post-procedure follow-up visits, and has provided written informed consent. Left Ventricular End Systolic Dimension (LVESD) is ≤ 70 mm assessed by site based on a transthoracic echocardiographic (TTE) obtained within 90 days prior to subject registration. For the CPX Sub-study: Subjects have to meet the COAPT study eligibility criteria to be registered in the CPX Sub-study. COAPT CAS study Inclusion Criteria: 1. Subjects must meet all of the above COAPT RCT inclusion criteria, and must have national Medicare coverage by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS). Exclusion Criteria: Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) requiring continuous home oxygen therapy or chronic outpatient oral steroid use. Untreated clinically significant coronary artery disease requiring revascularization. Coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) within 30 days prior to subject registration. Percutaneous coronary intervention within 30 days prior to subject registration. Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) within 30 days prior to subject registration. Tricuspid valve disease requiring surgery or transcatheter intervention. Aortic valve disease requiring surgery. Cerebrovascular accident within 30 days prior to subject registration. Severe symptomatic carotid stenosis (> 70% by ultrasound). Carotid surgery or stenting within 30 days prior to subject registration. American College of Cardiology /American Heart Association (ACC/AHA) Stage D heart failure. Presence of any of the following: Estimated pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP) > 70 mm Hg assessed by site based on echocardiography or right heart catheterization, unless active vasodilator therapy in the cath lab is able to reduce the pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) to < 3 Wood Units or between 3 and 4.5 Wood Units with v wave less than twice the mean of the pulmonary capillary wedge pressure Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy, restrictive cardiomyopathy, constrictive pericarditis, or any other structural heart disease causing heart failure other than dilated cardiomyopathy of either ischemic or non ischemic etiology Infiltrative cardiomyopathies (e.g., amyloidosis, hemochromatosis, sarcoidosis) Hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic support or mechanical heart assistance. Physical evidence of right-sided congestive heart failure with echocardiographic evidence of moderate or severe right ventricular dysfunction as assessed by site. Implant of any Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy (CRT) or Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy with cardioverter-defibrillator (CRT-D) within the last 30days prior to subject registration. Mitral valve orifice area < 4.0 cm2 assessed by site based on a transthoracic echocardiogram (TTE) within 90 days prior to subject registration. Leaflet anatomy which may preclude MitraClip implantation, proper MitraClip positioning on the leaflets or sufficient reduction in MR by the MitraClip. This evaluation is based on transesophageal echocardiogram (TEE) evaluation of the mitral valve within 180 days prior to subject registration and includes: Insufficient mobile leaflet available for grasping with the MitraClip device Evidence of calcification in the grasping area Presence of a significant cleft in the grasping area Lack of both primary and secondary chordal support in the grasping area Leaflet mobility length < 1 cm Hemodynamic instability defined as systolic pressure < 90 mmHg with or without afterload reduction, cardiogenic shock or the need for inotropic support or intra-aortic balloon pump or other hemodynamic support device. Need for emergent or urgent surgery for any reason or any planned cardiac surgery within the next 12 months. Life expectancy < 12 months due to non-cardiac conditions. Modified Rankin Scale ≥ 4 disability. Status 1 heart transplant or prior orthotopic heart transplantation. Prior mitral valve leaflet surgery or any currently implanted prosthetic mitral valve, or any prior transcatheter mitral valve procedure. Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation. Active endocarditis or active rheumatic heart disease or leaflets degenerated from rheumatic disease (i.e., noncompliant, perforated). Active infections requiring current antibiotic therapy. Subjects in whom transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is contraindicated or high risk. Known hypersensitivity or contraindication to procedural medications which cannot be adequately managed medically. Pregnant or planning pregnancy within next 12 months. Note: Female patients of childbearing age should be instructed to use safe contraception (e.g. intrauterine devices, hormonal contraceptives: contraceptive pills, implants, transdermal patches hormonal vaginal devices, injections with prolonged release. Currently participating in an investigational drug or another device study that has not reached its primary endpoint. Note: Trials requiring extended follow-up for products that were investigational, but have since become commercially available, are not considered investigational trials. Subject belongs to a vulnerable population per investigator's judgment or subject has any kind of disorder that compromises his/her ability to give written informed consent and/or to comply with study procedures. For the CPX Sub-study: Subjects who have any contraindications to CPX and are not capable of performing CPX per investigator's assessment should not be registered in the CPX Sub-study. COAPT CAS study Exclusion Criteria: 1. Subjects must not meet any of the above COAPT RCT exclusion criteria. .
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michael Mack, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Baylor Health Care System
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gregg Stone, MD
Organizational Affiliation
MOUNT SINAI HOSPITAL
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
William T Abraham, MD
Organizational Affiliation
The Ohio State University Heart Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
JoAnn Lindenfeld, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Alabama at Birmingham
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
35233
Country
United States
Facility Name
Banner Good Samaritan Medical Center
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85006
Country
United States
Facility Name
Scottsdale Healthcare Hospitals
City
Scottsdale
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85258
Country
United States
Facility Name
Scripps Green Hospital
City
La Jolla
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92037
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90048
Country
United States
Facility Name
El Camino Hospital
City
Mountain View
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94040
Country
United States
Facility Name
University California Davis Medical Center
City
Sacramento
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95817
Country
United States
Facility Name
Kaiser Permanente - San Francisco Hospital
City
San Francisco
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94115
Country
United States
Facility Name
Stanford Hospital and Clinics
City
Stanford
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94305
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Colorado Hospital
City
Denver
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80045
Country
United States
Facility Name
Hartford Hospital
City
Hartford
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06106
Country
United States
Facility Name
Yale - New Haven Hospital
City
New Haven
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06510
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medstar Washington Hospital Center
City
Washington
State/Province
District of Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
20010
Country
United States
Facility Name
Morton Plant Hospital
City
Clearwater
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33756
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mount Sinai Medical Center
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33140
Country
United States
Facility Name
Florida Hospital Orlando
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32803
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sarasota Memorial Hospital
City
Sarasota
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
34239
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tallahassee Memorial Hospital
City
Tallahassee
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32308
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tampa General Hospital
City
Tampa
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33606
Country
United States
Facility Name
Piedmont Hospital Atlanta
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30309
Country
United States
Facility Name
Emory University Hospital
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30322
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Queen's Medical Center
City
Honolulu
State/Province
Hawaii
ZIP/Postal Code
96813
Country
United States
Facility Name
Northwestern Memorial Hospital
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60611
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rush University Medical Center
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60612
Country
United States
Facility Name
Evanston Hospital
City
Evanston
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60201
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Vincent Heart Center of Indiana
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46290
Country
United States
Facility Name
Iowa Heart Center
City
Des Moines
State/Province
Iowa
ZIP/Postal Code
50266
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Kansas Hosp Authority
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66160
Country
United States
Facility Name
Via Christi
City
Wichita
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66866
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Joseph's Hospital - Lexington, KY
City
Lexington
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40504
Country
United States
Facility Name
Jewish Hospital
City
Louisville
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40245
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ochsner Clinic Foundation
City
New Orleans
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70121
Country
United States
Facility Name
Maine Medical Center
City
Portland
State/Province
Maine
ZIP/Postal Code
04102
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Maryland Baltimore
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21201
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tufts Medical Center
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02111
Country
United States
Facility Name
Massachusetts General Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02114
Country
United States
Facility Name
Brigham and Women's Hospital
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02115
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Michigan Hospitals
City
Ann Arbor
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48109
Country
United States
Facility Name
Henry Ford Hospital
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48202
Country
United States
Facility Name
William Beaumont Hospital
City
Royal Oak
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48073-6796
Country
United States
Facility Name
Abbott Northwestern Hospital
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55407
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Minnesota
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55455
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mayo Foundation for Med Edu And Research
City
Rochester
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55905
Country
United States
Facility Name
Saint Luke's Hospital
City
Kansas City
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
64111
Country
United States
Facility Name
Barnes Jewish Hospital
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Patrick Hospital
City
Missoula
State/Province
Montana
ZIP/Postal Code
59802
Country
United States
Facility Name
Nebraska Heart Institute Heart Hospital
City
Lincoln
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68526
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cooper University Hospital
City
Camden
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08103
Country
United States
Facility Name
Morristown Medical Center
City
Morristown
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
07960
Country
United States
Facility Name
North Shore
City
Manhasset
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11030
Country
United States
Facility Name
NYU Langone Medical Center
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10016
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mount Sinai Medical Center
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10029
Country
United States
Facility Name
Columbia University Medical Center / New York Presbyterian Hospital
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10032
Country
United States
Facility Name
NYP Weill Cornell Medical Center
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10065
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Francis Hospital
City
Roslyn
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11576
Country
United States
Facility Name
Carolinas Medical Center
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28203
Country
United States
Facility Name
Duke University Medical Center
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27710
Country
United States
Facility Name
Vidant Medical Center
City
Greenville
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27834
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Christ Hospital
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45219
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cleveland Clinic
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44195
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ohio State University Medical Center
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43210
Country
United States
Facility Name
Riverside Methodist Hospital
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43214-3907
Country
United States
Facility Name
Oklahoma Heart Hospital
City
Oklahoma City
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
73120
Country
United States
Facility Name
Providence St. Vincent Medical Center
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97225
Country
United States
Facility Name
Oregon Health and Science University
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97239
Country
United States
Facility Name
Hospital of University Pennsylvania
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Temple University Hospital
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19140
Country
United States
Facility Name
UPMC Presbyterian
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15213
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pinnacle Health at Harrisburg Hospital
City
Wormleysburg
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
17043
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medical University of South Carolina
City
Charleston
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29403
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Thomas Hospital
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37205
Country
United States
Facility Name
Seton Medical Center Austin
City
Austin
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78705
Country
United States
Facility Name
Baylor Heart and Vascular Hospital
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75204
Country
United States
Facility Name
UT Southwestern Medical Center
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75235
Country
United States
Facility Name
Houston Methodist Hospital
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Memorial Hermann Hospital
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Intermountain Medical Center
City
Murray
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84107
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Virginia
City
Charlottesville
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
22908
Country
United States
Facility Name
Virginia Commonwealth University Medical Center
City
Richmond
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23284
Country
United States
Facility Name
Carilion Roanoke Memorial Hospital
City
Roanoke
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
24014
Country
United States
Facility Name
Swedish Medical Center Cherry Hill Campus
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98122
Country
United States
Facility Name
St Paul's - Providence Health Care
City
Vancouver
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V6Z 1Y6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Hamilton Health Sciences
City
Hamilton
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L8L 2X2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
St Michael's Hospital
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M5B 1W8
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Montreal Heart Institute
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H1T 1C8
Country
Canada
Facility Name
University of Alberta
City
Edmonton
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
36357085
Citation
Giustino G, Camaj A, Kapadia SR, Kar S, Abraham WT, Lindenfeld J, Lim DS, Grayburn PA, Cohen DJ, Redfors B, Zhou Z, Pocock SJ, Asch FM, Mack MJ, Stone GW. Hospitalizations and Mortality in Patients With Secondary Mitral Regurgitation and Heart Failure: The COAPT Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022 Nov 15;80(20):1857-1868. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2022.08.803.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34674862
Citation
Brener MI, Grayburn P, Lindenfeld J, Burkhoff D, Liu M, Zhou Z, Alu MC, Medvedofsky DA, Asch FM, Weissman NJ, Bax J, Abraham W, Mack MJ, Stone GW, Hahn RT. Right Ventricular-Pulmonary Arterial Coupling in Patients With HF Secondary MR: Analysis From the COAPT Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Oct 25;14(20):2231-2242. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.07.047.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34391744
Citation
Kosmidou I, Lindenfeld J, Abraham WT, Rinaldi MJ, Kapadia SR, Rajagopal V, Sarembock IJ, Brieke A, Gaba P, Rogers JH, Shahim B, Redfors B, Zhang Z, Mack MJ, Stone GW. Sex-Specific Outcomes of Transcatheter Mitral-Valve Repair and Medical Therapy for Mitral Regurgitation in Heart Failure. JACC Heart Fail. 2021 Sep;9(9):674-683. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2021.04.011. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34391740
Citation
Arnold SV, Stone GW, Jain SS, Mack MJ, Saxon JT, Zhang Z, Lindenfeld J, Abraham WT, Cohen DJ; COAPT Investigators. Prognostic Importance of Health Status Versus Functional Status in Heart Failure and Secondary Mitral Regurgitation. JACC Heart Fail. 2021 Sep;9(9):684-692. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2021.04.012. Epub 2021 Aug 11.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34325886
Citation
Shahim B, Ben-Yehuda O, Chen S, Redfors B, Madhavan MV, Kar S, Lim DS, Asch FM, Weissman NJ, Cohen DJ, Arnold SV, Liu M, Lindenfeld J, Abraham WT, Mack MJ, Stone GW. Impact of Diabetes on Outcomes After Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair in Heart Failure: COAPT Trial. JACC Heart Fail. 2021 Aug;9(8):559-567. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2021.03.011.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34039025
Citation
Kar S, Mack MJ, Lindenfeld J, Abraham WT, Asch FM, Weissman NJ, Enriquez-Sarano M, Lim DS, Mishell JM, Whisenant BK, Rogers JH, Arnold SV, Cohen DJ, Grayburn PA, Stone GW. Relationship Between Residual Mitral Regurgitation and Clinical and Quality-of-Life Outcomes After Transcatheter and Medical Treatments in Heart Failure: COAPT Trial. Circulation. 2021 Aug 10;144(6):426-437. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.120.053061. Epub 2021 May 27.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33719505
Citation
Gertz ZM, Herrmann HC, Lim DS, Kar S, Kapadia SR, Reed GW, Puri R, Krishnaswamy A, Gersh BJ, Weissman NJ, Asch FM, Grayburn PA, Kosmidou I, Redfors B, Zhang Z, Abraham WT, Lindenfeld J, Stone GW, Mack MJ. Implications of Atrial Fibrillation on the Mechanisms of Mitral Regurgitation and Response to MitraClip in the COAPT Trial. Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Apr;14(4):e010300. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.120.010300. Epub 2021 Mar 15.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33632476
Citation
Mack MJ, Lindenfeld J, Abraham WT, Kar S, Lim DS, Mishell JM, Whisenant BK, Grayburn PA, Rinaldi MJ, Kapadia SR, Rajagopal V, Sarembock IJ, Brieke A, Rogers JH, Marx SO, Cohen DJ, Weissman NJ, Stone GW; COAPT Investigators. 3-Year Outcomes of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair in Patients With Heart Failure. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2021 Mar 2;77(8):1029-1040. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.12.047.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33533873
Citation
Lindenfeld J, Abraham WT, Grayburn PA, Kar S, Asch FM, Lim DS, Nie H, Singhal P, Sundareswaran KS, Weissman NJ, Mack MJ, Stone GW; Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients With Functional Mitral Regurgitation (COAPT) Investigators. Association of Effective Regurgitation Orifice Area to Left Ventricular End-Diastolic Volume Ratio With Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair Outcomes: A Secondary Analysis of the COAPT Trial. JAMA Cardiol. 2021 Apr 1;6(4):427-436. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2020.7200.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33303119
Citation
Saxon JT, Cohen DJ, Chhatriwalla AK, Kotinkaduwa LN, Kar S, Lim DS, Abraham WT, Lindenfeld J, Mack MJ, Arnold SV, Stone GW. Impact of COPD on Outcomes After MitraClip for Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: The COAPT Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Dec 14;13(23):2795-2803. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.09.023.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33176460
Citation
Kosmidou I, Lindenfeld J, Abraham WT, Kar S, Lim DS, Mishell JM, Whisenant BK, Kipperman RM, Boudoulas KD, Redfors B, Shahim B, Zhang Z, Mack MJ, Stone GW. Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair in Patients With and Without Cardiac Resynchronization Therapy: The COAPT Trial. Circ Heart Fail. 2020 Nov;13(11):e007293. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.120.007293. Epub 2020 Nov 12.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
33092705
Citation
Giustino G, Lindenfeld J, Abraham WT, Kar S, Lim DS, Grayburn PA, Kapadia SR, Cohen DJ, Kotinkaduwa LN, Weissman NJ, Mack MJ, Stone GW. NYHA Functional Classification and Outcomes After Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair in Heart Failure: The COAPT Trial. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2020 Oct 26;13(20):2317-2328. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2020.06.058.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32912445
Citation
Hahn RT, Asch F, Weissman NJ, Grayburn P, Kar S, Lim S, Ben-Yehuda O, Shahim B, Chen S, Liu M, Redfors B, Medvedofsky D, Puri R, Kapadia S, Sannino A, Lindenfeld J, Abraham WT, Mack MJ, Stone GW. Impact of Tricuspid Regurgitation on Clinical Outcomes: The COAPT Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Sep 15;76(11):1305-1314. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.035.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32854834
Citation
Grayburn PA, Sannino A, Cohen DJ, Kar S, Lim DS, Mishell JM, Whisenant BK, Rinaldi MJ, Kapadia SR, Rajagopal V, Crowley A, Kotinkaduwa LN, Lindenfeld J, Abraham WT, Mack MJ, Stone GW. Predictors of Clinical Response to Transcatheter Reduction of Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: The COAPT Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Sep 1;76(9):1007-1014. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.07.010.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32194195
Citation
Arnold SV, Stone GW, Mack MJ, Chhatriwalla AK, Austin BA, Zhang Z, Ben-Yehuda O, Kar S, Lim DS, Lindenfeld J, Abraham WT, Cohen DJ; COAPT Investigators. Health Status Changes and Outcomes in Patients With Heart Failure and Mitral Regurgitation: COAPT Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 May 5;75(17):2099-2106. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.03.002. Epub 2020 Mar 16.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31865965
Citation
Tang GHL. Echocardiographic Understanding of Secondary Mitral Regurgitation in Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair: More to Learn. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Dec 17;74(24):2980-2981. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.11.001. Epub 2019 Dec 9. No abstract available.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31574303
Citation
Asch FM, Grayburn PA, Siegel RJ, Kar S, Lim DS, Zaroff JG, Mishell JM, Whisenant B, Mack MJ, Lindenfeld J, Abraham WT, Stone GW, Weissman NJ; COAPT Investigators. Echocardiographic Outcomes After Transcatheter Leaflet Approximation in Patients With Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: The COAPT Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 Dec 17;74(24):2969-2979. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.09.017. Epub 2019 Sep 28.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31564137
Citation
Baron SJ, Wang K, Arnold SV, Magnuson EA, Whisenant B, Brieke A, Rinaldi M, Asgar AW, Lindenfeld J, Abraham WT, Mack MJ, Stone GW, Cohen DJ; COAPT Investigators. Cost-Effectiveness of Transcatheter Mitral Valve Repair Versus Medical Therapy in Patients With Heart Failure and Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: Results From the COAPT Trial. Circulation. 2019 Dec 3;140(23):1881-1891. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.119.043275. Epub 2019 Sep 29.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30894288
Citation
Arnold SV, Chinnakondepalli KM, Spertus JA, Magnuson EA, Baron SJ, Kar S, Lim DS, Mishell JM, Abraham WT, Lindenfeld JA, Mack MJ, Stone GW, Cohen DJ; COAPT Investigators. Health Status After Transcatheter Mitral-Valve Repair in Heart Failure and Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: COAPT Trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2019 May 7;73(17):2123-2132. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2019.02.010. Epub 2019 Mar 17.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30280640
Citation
Stone GW, Lindenfeld J, Abraham WT, Kar S, Lim DS, Mishell JM, Whisenant B, Grayburn PA, Rinaldi M, Kapadia SR, Rajagopal V, Sarembock IJ, Brieke A, Marx SO, Cohen DJ, Weissman NJ, Mack MJ; COAPT Investigators. Transcatheter Mitral-Valve Repair in Patients with Heart Failure. N Engl J Med. 2018 Dec 13;379(24):2307-2318. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1806640. Epub 2018 Sep 23.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30134187
Citation
Mack MJ, Abraham WT, Lindenfeld J, Bolling SF, Feldman TE, Grayburn PA, Kapadia SR, McCarthy PM, Lim DS, Udelson JE, Zile MR, Gammie JS, Gillinov AM, Glower DD, Heimansohn DA, Suri RM, Ellis JT, Shu Y, Kar S, Weissman NJ, Stone GW. Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip in Patients with Heart Failure and Secondary Mitral Regurgitation: Design and rationale of the COAPT trial. Am Heart J. 2018 Nov;205:1-11. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2018.07.021. Epub 2018 Aug 1.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Cardiovascular Outcomes Assessment of the MitraClip Percutaneous Therapy for Heart Failure Patients With Functional Mitral Regurgitation (The COAPT Trial) and COAPT CAS

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs