Prevention of Phantom Limb Pain After Transtibial Amputation (PLATA)
Primary Purpose
Phantom Limb Pain, Chronic Pain, Prevention
Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Sciatic name block
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Phantom Limb Pain focused on measuring Phantom limb pain, Chronic pain, Amputation, Peripheral vascular disease
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- patients undergoing elective transtibial amputation for peripheral vascular disease
- age over 18 years
- American Society of Anaesthesiology status II to IV
Exclusion Criteria:
- contraindication to peripheral regional anesthesia
- psychiatric disease
- pregnancy or breastfeeding status
- amputation for tumour surgery
- traumatic amputation
- inability to give written and informed consent.
Sites / Locations
- Massachusetts General Hospital, Dept. of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine
- General Hospital Klagenfurt
- Innsbruck Medical University Hospital
- Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg
- Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam
- Westfriesgasthuis
- Erasmus Medical Center
- Canisius Wilhelmus Ziekenhuis
- Valencia University Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Nerve block
Control
Arm Description
Optimized intravenous pain treatment during surgery and for 7 days postoperatively. Definition: strong opioid patient-controlled analgesia, non-opioids, ketamine intravenously. Sciatic nerve block: infusion of local anesthetic.
Optimized intravenous pain treatment during surgery and for 7 days postoperatively. Definition: strong opioid patient-controlled analgesia, non-opioids, ketamine intravenously. Sciatic nerve block: saline infusion.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Point prevalence of chronic phantom limb pain
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01626755
First Posted
June 21, 2012
Last Updated
October 25, 2017
Sponsor
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Collaborators
European Society of Anaesthesiology
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01626755
Brief Title
Prevention of Phantom Limb Pain After Transtibial Amputation
Acronym
PLATA
Official Title
Prevention of Phantom Limb Pain After Transtibial Amputation (PLATA) - Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled, Multi-center Trial Comparing Optimized Intravenous Pain Control vs Optimized Intravenous Pain Control Plus Nerve Block.
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
October 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Lack of funding and recruitment.
Study Start Date
August 2013 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
April 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 2017 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Collaborators
European Society of Anaesthesiology
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Phantom limb pain following amputation is a major problem. Current evidence how to best prevent phantom limb pain is equivocal because previous trials have included small numbers of patients, and tested heterogeneous patient collectives. There is some evidence that optimized perioperative pain control is effective in preventing phantom limb pain, but the potential added role of regional anesthesia has not been defined.
Objective:
The Aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that sciatic nerve block decreases the point prevalence of phantom limb pain 12 months after transtibial amputation for peripheral vascular disease compared to optimized intravenous pain therapy.
Study design:
Randomized, prospective, double-blind (patient, physician, statistician) clinical trial. All patients will receive standard optimized intravenous anesthesia and analgesia (opiate patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), intravenous ketamine). Patients in the intervention group will receive additional infusion of local anesthetic via a sciatic nerve catheter placed under ultrasound guidance.
Main outcome of this study:
Point prevalence of chronic phantom limb pain after 12 months.
Detailed Description
Rationale:
Phantom limb pain following amputation is a major clinical problem. Current evidence how to best prevent phantom limb pain is equivocal because previous trials have included small numbers of patients, and tested heterogeneous patient collectives. There is some evidence that optimized perioperative pain control is effective in preventing phantom limb pain, but the potential added role of regional anesthesia has not been defined.
Objective:
The Aim of this study is to test the hypothesis that sciatic nerve block decreases the point prevalence of phantom limb pain 12 months after transtibial amputation for peripheral vascular disease compared to optimized intravenous pain therapy.
Study design:
Randomized, prospective, double-blind (patient, physician, statistician) clinical trial. All patients will receive standard optimized intravenous anesthesia and analgesia (opiate patient-controlled analgesia (PCA), intravenous ketamine). Patients in the intervention group will receive additional infusion of local anesthetic via a sciatic nerve catheter placed under ultrasound guidance.
Study population:
Patients undergoing elective transtibial amputation for peripheral vascular disease at one of the participating centres, ASA status II to IV.
Intervention:
Infusion of local anesthetic via sciatic nerve catheter placed under ultrasound guidance.
Main study parameter/endpoint:
Point prevalence of chronic phantom limb pain after 12 months.
Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness:
All patients, regardless of group allocation, will receive optimalized intravenous pain treatment. The aim of this study is to assess whether additional regional anesthesia (ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block) can decrease the incidence of phantom limb pain. The working hypothesis is that patients undergoing intervention treatment (optimized intravenous therapy plus nerve block) are expected to feature a decreased incidence of phantom limb pain at 12 months, in addition to improved perioperative analgesia.
The administration of both optimalized intravenous pain treatment and peripheral nerve blockade is routine clinical practice for many procedures on the lower leg, including amputation. The risk of this intervention can be described as very low. In control patients, the sciatic catheter will be used for rescue pain treatment.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Phantom Limb Pain, Chronic Pain, Prevention
Keywords
Phantom limb pain, Chronic pain, Amputation, Peripheral vascular disease
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
12 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Nerve block
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Optimized intravenous pain treatment during surgery and for 7 days postoperatively.
Definition: strong opioid patient-controlled analgesia, non-opioids, ketamine intravenously.
Sciatic nerve block: infusion of local anesthetic.
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Optimized intravenous pain treatment during surgery and for 7 days postoperatively.
Definition: strong opioid patient-controlled analgesia, non-opioids, ketamine intravenously.
Sciatic nerve block: saline infusion.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Sciatic name block
Intervention Description
Ultrasound-guided sciatic nerve block.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Point prevalence of chronic phantom limb pain
Time Frame
12 months after amputation
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
patients undergoing elective transtibial amputation for peripheral vascular disease
age over 18 years
American Society of Anaesthesiology status II to IV
Exclusion Criteria:
contraindication to peripheral regional anesthesia
psychiatric disease
pregnancy or breastfeeding status
amputation for tumour surgery
traumatic amputation
inability to give written and informed consent.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Markus Hollmann, MD PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Dept. of Anaesthesiology, Academic Medical Center / University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Official's Role
Study Chair
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Philipp Lirk, MD PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Dept. of Anaesthesiology, Academic Medical Center / University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Massachusetts General Hospital, Dept. of Anesthesiology, Perioperative and Pain Medicine
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02115
Country
United States
Facility Name
General Hospital Klagenfurt
City
Klagenfurt
State/Province
Carinthia
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Innsbruck Medical University Hospital
City
Innsbruck
State/Province
Tirol
ZIP/Postal Code
6020
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Ziekenhuis Oost Limburg
City
Genk
State/Province
Limburg
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Academic Medical Center, University of Amsterdam
City
Amsterdam
State/Province
Noord-Holland
ZIP/Postal Code
1105AZ
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Westfriesgasthuis
City
Hoorn
State/Province
Noord-Holland
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Erasmus Medical Center
City
Rotterdam
State/Province
Noord-Holland
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Canisius Wilhelmus Ziekenhuis
City
Nijmegen
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Valencia University Hospital
City
Valencia
Country
Spain
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
20800987
Citation
Ypsilantis E, Tang TY. Pre-emptive analgesia for chronic limb pain after amputation for peripheral vascular disease: a systematic review. Ann Vasc Surg. 2010 Nov;24(8):1139-46. doi: 10.1016/j.avsg.2010.03.026.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21383618
Citation
Rathmell JP, Kehlet H. Do we have the tools to prevent phantom limb pain? Anesthesiology. 2011 May;114(5):1021-4. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31820fc80d. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Prevention of Phantom Limb Pain After Transtibial Amputation
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs