Effectiveness and Cost Management of Multicolumn Spinal Cord Stimulation in Neuropathic Pain Patients With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome (ESTIMET)
Primary Purpose
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
comparison of spinal cord stimulation
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Failed Back Surgery Syndrome
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Aged from 18 to 80 years
- Presence of FBSS ≥ 3 months after one or several spine surgery
- Presence of back and leg pain with documented neuropathic component (DN4)
- Having failed well conducted conservative treatment
- Meeting the criteria for a test of spinal cord stimulation as recommended by HAS (multidisciplinary consultation, psychological evaluation
- Presence of uni-or bilateral radicular pain with severe intensity, VAS score greater than or equal to 50/100 (daily VAS mean on 5 consecutive days).
- Presence of associated back pain, as related to type "bar" or "tender points"
- Understanding and accepting the constraints of the study
- Covered by a French Health Insurance plan or benefiting of such as a third party in agreement with the French law (Huriet law n°88.1138 and modifications) on biomedical research
- Has given written consent to the study after receiving clear information.
- Absence of psychosis or evolutionary history of severe psychosis requiring hospitalization.
- Absence of progressive malignancy
Exclusion Criteria:
- Age < 18 and > 80 years
- Accessible because of back pain surgery 'mechanical' causal (discogenic back pain, spinal instability, spinal deformation)
- Presence of surgery, anesthetic and psychiatric contraindication for spinal cord stimulation system implantation
- Absence of informed consent signature
- Women of childbearing without effective contraception (hormonal / mechanical: oral, injectable, transdermal, implantable, intrauterine device or surgical: tubal ligation, hysterectomy, oophorectomy total) or breastfeeding.
- Subject not covered by a French Health Insurance plan or not benefiting of such as a third party
- Subject receiving enhanced protection: minors, pregnant women, nursing women, persons deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, adults under legal protection, and finally patients in emergency situations.
Sites / Locations
- Poitiers University Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Experimental
Arm Label
Monocolumn spinal cord stimulation
Multicolumn spinal cord stimulation
Arm Description
Specify 5-6-5 Lead (only one column)
Specify 5-6-5 Lead
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Visual Analogic Scale Low Back pain
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01628237
First Posted
May 3, 2012
Last Updated
February 13, 2015
Sponsor
Poitiers University Hospital
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01628237
Brief Title
Effectiveness and Cost Management of Multicolumn Spinal Cord Stimulation in Neuropathic Pain Patients With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome
Acronym
ESTIMET
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 2012 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
January 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 2015 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Poitiers University Hospital
4. Oversight
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Failed back surgery syndrome (FBSS) constitutes a frequent pathology, generates a severe handicap for patients and represents a considerable expense for healthcare system. Neurostimulation has currently not been validated in the treatment of back pain because of technological limitations in implantable spinal cord stimulation (SCS). The lack of a validated technique for back pain relief has prompted the development of newer devices, including leads with increased number of contacts (up to 16) and various geometric arrangements, the objective of which is to cover a larger area while attempting to extend, steer, or focus the electric field of the stimulation within the spinal cord regions. This led companies to design a new generation of multicolumn surgical leads that allow the activation of longitudinal and transverse electric fields (multicolumn spinal cord stimulation, MSCS) in order to provide bilateral paresthesia coverage of back pain.
The objective of this study is to compare the analgesic efficacy of MSCS (using longitudinal and transverse electric stimulation) versus mono-column spinal cord stimulation (CSCS, using axial stimulation, actually represented by quadripolar or octopolar lead) on the treatment of lumbar pain.
A total of 115 patients will be randomized to either CSCS or MSCS. Patients, between 18 and 80 years old suffering from refractory neuropathic pain of radicular origin with associated back pain will be included. Patients will be divided into two groups. One group with MSCS during the 12 months after the new generation electrode implantation and one group with CSCS during 6 months and MSCS between 6 and 12 months after the new generation electrode implantation.
The following parameters will be evaluated during this study: overall pain VAS, leg pain VAS, back pain VAS, Oswestry disability index, Montgomery and Asberg Depression Rating scale, Brief Anxiety Scale and the Euro Quality of Life-5 Dimension Health questionnaire and costing in relation to surgery and patient management.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Failed Back Surgery Syndrome
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
115 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Monocolumn spinal cord stimulation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Specify 5-6-5 Lead (only one column)
Arm Title
Multicolumn spinal cord stimulation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Specify 5-6-5 Lead
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
comparison of spinal cord stimulation
Other Intervention Name(s)
Specify(TM) 5-6-5 lead (Medtronic)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Visual Analogic Scale Low Back pain
Time Frame
Month 6
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Aged from 18 to 80 years
Presence of FBSS ≥ 3 months after one or several spine surgery
Presence of back and leg pain with documented neuropathic component (DN4)
Having failed well conducted conservative treatment
Meeting the criteria for a test of spinal cord stimulation as recommended by HAS (multidisciplinary consultation, psychological evaluation
Presence of uni-or bilateral radicular pain with severe intensity, VAS score greater than or equal to 50/100 (daily VAS mean on 5 consecutive days).
Presence of associated back pain, as related to type "bar" or "tender points"
Understanding and accepting the constraints of the study
Covered by a French Health Insurance plan or benefiting of such as a third party in agreement with the French law (Huriet law n°88.1138 and modifications) on biomedical research
Has given written consent to the study after receiving clear information.
Absence of psychosis or evolutionary history of severe psychosis requiring hospitalization.
Absence of progressive malignancy
Exclusion Criteria:
Age < 18 and > 80 years
Accessible because of back pain surgery 'mechanical' causal (discogenic back pain, spinal instability, spinal deformation)
Presence of surgery, anesthetic and psychiatric contraindication for spinal cord stimulation system implantation
Absence of informed consent signature
Women of childbearing without effective contraception (hormonal / mechanical: oral, injectable, transdermal, implantable, intrauterine device or surgical: tubal ligation, hysterectomy, oophorectomy total) or breastfeeding.
Subject not covered by a French Health Insurance plan or not benefiting of such as a third party
Subject receiving enhanced protection: minors, pregnant women, nursing women, persons deprived of liberty by a judicial or administrative decision, adults under legal protection, and finally patients in emergency situations.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Poitiers University Hospital
City
Poitiers
ZIP/Postal Code
86021
Country
France
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25456442
Citation
Roulaud M, Durand-Zaleski I, Ingrand P, Serrie A, Diallo B, Peruzzi P, Hieu PD, Voirin J, Raoul S, Page P, Fontaine D, Lanteri-Minet M, Blond S, Buisset N, Cuny E, Cadenne M, Caire F, Ranoux D, Mertens P, Naous H, Simon E, Emery E, Gadan B, Regis J, Sol JC, Beraud G, Debiais F, Durand G, Guetarni Ging F, Prevost A, Brandet C, Monlezun O, Delmotte A, d'Houtaud S, Bataille B, Rigoard P. Multicolumn spinal cord stimulation for significant low back pain in failed back surgery syndrome: design of a national, multicentre, randomized, controlled health economics trial (ESTIMET Study). Neurochirurgie. 2015 Mar;61 Suppl 1:S109-16. doi: 10.1016/j.neuchi.2014.10.105. Epub 2014 Nov 20.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Effectiveness and Cost Management of Multicolumn Spinal Cord Stimulation in Neuropathic Pain Patients With Failed Back Surgery Syndrome
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs