search
Back to results

Frequency Modulated Neural Stimulation (FREMS) in Symptomatic Diabetic Neuropathy

Primary Purpose

Diabetic Neuropathy, Painful

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Frequency Modulated Neural Stimulation (FREMS) (Aptiva)
sham treatment (Aptiva)
Sponsored by
Lorenz Biotech S.p.A.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Diabetic Neuropathy, Painful focused on measuring Diabetic Neuropathy, Painful

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes
  • Diabetes duration of > 1 year
  • Age: 18 to 75 years
  • Symptomatic neuropathy
  • Abnormal amplitude, latency or conduction velocity in at least one motor nerve (Tibial or Peroneal) or in the Sural Nerve
  • A measurable Sural Nerve conduction velocity
  • Stable glycemic control in the last 3 months, HbA1C < 11%
  • MDNS score > 7
  • Stable dose of analgesic medications, if any, in the month prior enrollment

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous treatment with TENS or other electrotherapy
  • Motor or Sensitive nerve conduction velocity < 30 non recordable/evocable
  • Unstable glycemic control during last 3 months
  • Pregnancy
  • Implanted pacemaker or defibrillator or neurostimulator
  • Cancer diagnosed in the last 5 years
  • Psychological or psychiatric disorders that in the Investigator's opinion may interfere with patient's compliance to study procedures
  • Active foot ulcer and/or major lower limb amputation
  • Diabetic mononeuropathy
  • Severe peripheral artery disease (Leriche Fontaine scale grade 3 and 4)
  • Ankle-brachial index (ABI) < 0.7
  • Uremic neuropathy or end-stage renal disease
  • Toxic neuropathies
  • Severe hepatic disease
  • Alcohol consumption ≥ 40 g/day or 30 units/week

Sites / Locations

  • Paris-Nord University
  • Heinrich Heine University
  • San Raffaele Hospital & Scientific Institute
  • University of Padua
  • University of Perugia
  • Tor Vergata University

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Sham Comparator

Arm Label

FREMS

Control

Arm Description

Frequency Modulated Neural Stimulation (FREMS)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in Nerve Conduction Velocity of the Deep Peroneal, Tibial, or Sural Nerve
Change in Nerve Conduction Velocity of the Deep Peroneal , Tibial, or Sural Nerve at 51 weeks (i.e., after three cycles of FREMS treatment) versus baseline

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in Vibration Perception Threshold
Change in Vibration Perception Threshold at 51 weeks (i.e., after three cycles of FREMS treatment) versus baseline
Change in Cold Sensory Threshold
Change in Cold Sensory Threshold at 51 weeks (i.e., after three cycles of FREMS treatment) versus baseline
Change in Warm Sensory Threshold
Change in Warm Sensory Threshold at 51 weeks (i.e., after three cycles of FREMS treatment) versus baseline
Change in Day Pain Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale)
Change in Pain Intensity (assessed using Visual Analogue Scale) during day time with the first cycle of FREMS
Change in Day Pain Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale)
Change in Pain Intensity (assessed using Visual Analogue Scale) during day time with the second cycle of FREMS
Change in Day Pain Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale)
Change in Pain Intensity (assessed using Visual Analogue Scale) during day time with the third cycle of FREMS
Change in Night Pain Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale)
Change in Pain Intensity (assessed using Visual Analogue Scale) during night time with the first cycle of FREMS
Change in Night Pain Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale)
Change in Pain Intensity (assessed using Visual Analogue Scale) during night time with the second cycle of FREMS
Change in Night Pain Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale)
Change in Pain Intensity (assessed using Visual Analogue Scale) during night time with the third cycle of FREMS
Change in the Michigan Diabetic Neuropathy Score (MDNS)
Change in the Michigan Diabetic Neuropathy Score (MDNS) at 51 weeks (i.e. after three FREMS cycles) versus baseline
Change in the dose and type of analgesic medications
Change in the dose and type of analgesic medications at week 51 (i.e. after three FREMS cycles) versus baseline
Number of patients with treatment-related adverse events
Change in the dose and type of analgesic medications at week 51 (i.e. after three FREMS cycles) versus baseline

Full Information

First Posted
June 23, 2012
Last Updated
June 26, 2012
Sponsor
Lorenz Biotech S.p.A.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01628627
Brief Title
Frequency Modulated Neural Stimulation (FREMS) in Symptomatic Diabetic Neuropathy
Official Title
Long Term, Double Blind, Randomized, Placebo Controlled Multi-center Study of FRE.M.S.- Frequency Modulated Neural Stimulation Lorenz Therapy™ in Symptomatic Diabetic Neuropathy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2012
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 2006 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
April 2010 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 2010 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Lorenz Biotech S.p.A.

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Aim of this study is to evaluate safety and efficacy of transcutaneous frequency modulated electromagnetic neural stimulation (FREMS) to treat symptomatic peripheral neuropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus.
Detailed Description
Diabetic neuropathy is a common and potentially disabling complication of patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes due to the damage of peripheral nerves caused by chronic hyperglycemia. The most common clinical signs and symptoms of diabetic neuropathy include numbness, diminished sensation and painful symptoms, such as burning, pins and needles, intolerable pain and hyperaesthesia of the lower extremities. Different classes of drugs, such as analgesics, antidepressants and anti-epileptics are variably efficacious in pain relief, but are unfortunately unable to revert the natural history of the disease. A wide range of electrotherapies have been proposed for the non-pharmacological treatment of diabetic neuropathy. The rationale of using electric or magnetic stimulation is the potential enhancement of microcirculation and endoneural blood flow, possibly counteracting the nerve ischemic damage, together with other yet poorly understood mechanisms, such as masking pain by interfering with pain gate control. A number of studies have reported the efficacy of different electrotherapies, such as transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS), pulsed-dose electrical stimulation, peripheral nerve, nerve root, spinal cord, deep brain and epidural motor cortex stimulations, pulsed (electro-)magnetic fields and static magnetic fields, high-frequency external muscle stimulation, high-tone external muscle stimulation and external muscle stimulation. However, of all these electrotherapies, only TENS is currently recommended as a treatment for painful diabetic neuropathy by the American Academy of Neurology. Recently, a novel transcutaneous frequency-modulated electromagnetic neural stimulation (also named as Frequency Rhythmic Electrical Modulation System, FREMS), has been developed. FREMS consists of a sequence of modulated electrical stimuli that varies automatically in terms of pulse frequency, duration and voltage amplitude. FREMS was tested in a pilot randomized, cross-over study, and reduced diabetic neuropathy pain and ameliorated the sensory tactile and vibration perception threshold and motor nerve conduction velocity compared to a sham treatment. The aim of this study was to test the efficacy and safety of FREMS in a multicentre, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study enrolling a large population with symptomatic diabetic polyneuropathy, with repeated treatment sessions and a post-treatment follow-up of adequate length.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Diabetic Neuropathy, Painful
Keywords
Diabetic Neuropathy, Painful

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
164 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
FREMS
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Frequency Modulated Neural Stimulation (FREMS)
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Frequency Modulated Neural Stimulation (FREMS) (Aptiva)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Aptiva device (Lorenz Biotech, Medolla, Italy)
Intervention Description
FREMS consisted of sequences of biphasic (negative and positive), asymmetric and electrically balanced pulses, composed of: 1) an active phase of high negative voltage spike (variable, max -300 V) and extra short duration (variable, 10-100 μsec, mostly ~40 μsec); followed by: 2) a recharging phase of low voltage and long duration (0.9 - 999 msec); pulse frequency was variable, ranging 1 to 1,000 Hz, mainly in the low range 1-50 Hz. Three cycles of 10 consecutive (one a day for 5 days/week) applications to both lower limbs were delivered.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
sham treatment (Aptiva)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Aptiva device (Lorenz Biotech, Medolla, Italy)
Intervention Description
The sham treatment consisted of no electrical pulses delivered by the same device used to deliver the FREMS treatment and with the same treatment procedure and schedule.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Nerve Conduction Velocity of the Deep Peroneal, Tibial, or Sural Nerve
Description
Change in Nerve Conduction Velocity of the Deep Peroneal , Tibial, or Sural Nerve at 51 weeks (i.e., after three cycles of FREMS treatment) versus baseline
Time Frame
baseline and 51 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Vibration Perception Threshold
Description
Change in Vibration Perception Threshold at 51 weeks (i.e., after three cycles of FREMS treatment) versus baseline
Time Frame
baseline and 51 weeks
Title
Change in Cold Sensory Threshold
Description
Change in Cold Sensory Threshold at 51 weeks (i.e., after three cycles of FREMS treatment) versus baseline
Time Frame
baseline and 51 weeks
Title
Change in Warm Sensory Threshold
Description
Change in Warm Sensory Threshold at 51 weeks (i.e., after three cycles of FREMS treatment) versus baseline
Time Frame
baseline and 51 weeks
Title
Change in Day Pain Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale)
Description
Change in Pain Intensity (assessed using Visual Analogue Scale) during day time with the first cycle of FREMS
Time Frame
baseline and week 3
Title
Change in Day Pain Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale)
Description
Change in Pain Intensity (assessed using Visual Analogue Scale) during day time with the second cycle of FREMS
Time Frame
week 17 and week 20
Title
Change in Day Pain Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale)
Description
Change in Pain Intensity (assessed using Visual Analogue Scale) during day time with the third cycle of FREMS
Time Frame
week 34 and week 37
Title
Change in Night Pain Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale)
Description
Change in Pain Intensity (assessed using Visual Analogue Scale) during night time with the first cycle of FREMS
Time Frame
baseline and week 3
Title
Change in Night Pain Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale)
Description
Change in Pain Intensity (assessed using Visual Analogue Scale) during night time with the second cycle of FREMS
Time Frame
week 17 and week 20
Title
Change in Night Pain Intensity (Visual Analogue Scale)
Description
Change in Pain Intensity (assessed using Visual Analogue Scale) during night time with the third cycle of FREMS
Time Frame
week 34 and week 37
Title
Change in the Michigan Diabetic Neuropathy Score (MDNS)
Description
Change in the Michigan Diabetic Neuropathy Score (MDNS) at 51 weeks (i.e. after three FREMS cycles) versus baseline
Time Frame
baseline and 51 weeks
Title
Change in the dose and type of analgesic medications
Description
Change in the dose and type of analgesic medications at week 51 (i.e. after three FREMS cycles) versus baseline
Time Frame
baseline and 51 weeks
Title
Number of patients with treatment-related adverse events
Description
Change in the dose and type of analgesic medications at week 51 (i.e. after three FREMS cycles) versus baseline
Time Frame
baseline and 51 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Type 1 or Type 2 diabetes Diabetes duration of > 1 year Age: 18 to 75 years Symptomatic neuropathy Abnormal amplitude, latency or conduction velocity in at least one motor nerve (Tibial or Peroneal) or in the Sural Nerve A measurable Sural Nerve conduction velocity Stable glycemic control in the last 3 months, HbA1C < 11% MDNS score > 7 Stable dose of analgesic medications, if any, in the month prior enrollment Exclusion Criteria: Previous treatment with TENS or other electrotherapy Motor or Sensitive nerve conduction velocity < 30 non recordable/evocable Unstable glycemic control during last 3 months Pregnancy Implanted pacemaker or defibrillator or neurostimulator Cancer diagnosed in the last 5 years Psychological or psychiatric disorders that in the Investigator's opinion may interfere with patient's compliance to study procedures Active foot ulcer and/or major lower limb amputation Diabetic mononeuropathy Severe peripheral artery disease (Leriche Fontaine scale grade 3 and 4) Ankle-brachial index (ABI) < 0.7 Uremic neuropathy or end-stage renal disease Toxic neuropathies Severe hepatic disease Alcohol consumption ≥ 40 g/day or 30 units/week
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Emanuele Bosi, MD
Organizational Affiliation
San Raffaele Hospital & Scientific Institute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Paris-Nord University
City
Bondy
State/Province
Ile del France
Country
France
Facility Name
Heinrich Heine University
City
Düsseldorf
ZIP/Postal Code
40225
Country
Germany
Facility Name
San Raffaele Hospital & Scientific Institute
City
Milano
State/Province
MI
ZIP/Postal Code
20132
Country
Italy
Facility Name
University of Padua
City
Padua
State/Province
PD
ZIP/Postal Code
35143
Country
Italy
Facility Name
University of Perugia
City
Perugia
State/Province
PG
ZIP/Postal Code
06100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Tor Vergata University
City
Rome
State/Province
RM
ZIP/Postal Code
00133
Country
Italy

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
18403219
Citation
Conti M, Peretti E, Cazzetta G, Galimberti G, Vermigli C, Pola R, Scionti L, Bosi E. Frequency-modulated electromagnetic neural stimulation enhances cutaneous microvascular flow in patients with diabetic neuropathy. J Diabetes Complications. 2009 Jan-Feb;23(1):46-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jdiacomp.2008.02.004. Epub 2008 Apr 10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15834546
Citation
Bosi E, Conti M, Vermigli C, Cazzetta G, Peretti E, Cordoni MC, Galimberti G, Scionti L. Effectiveness of frequency-modulated electromagnetic neural stimulation in the treatment of painful diabetic neuropathy. Diabetologia. 2005 May;48(5):817-23. doi: 10.1007/s00125-005-1734-2. Epub 2005 Apr 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23238789
Citation
Bosi E, Bax G, Scionti L, Spallone V, Tesfaye S, Valensi P, Ziegler D; FREMS European Trial Study Group. Frequency-modulated electromagnetic neural stimulation (FREMS) as a treatment for symptomatic diabetic neuropathy: results from a double-blind, randomised, multicentre, long-term, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Diabetologia. 2013 Mar;56(3):467-75. doi: 10.1007/s00125-012-2795-7. Epub 2012 Dec 13.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Frequency Modulated Neural Stimulation (FREMS) in Symptomatic Diabetic Neuropathy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs