search
Back to results

Feasibility Study for Enhancing Gait Following Stroke With Implanted Microstimulators

Primary Purpose

Hemiparesis

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Radio-frequency Microstiumulator
Sponsored by
The Alfred E. Mann Foundation for Scientific Research
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional device feasibility trial for Hemiparesis

Eligibility Criteria

21 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Cognition intact to give valid informed consent to participate.
  2. Sufficient endurance to participate in rehabilitation sessions.
  3. Ability to follow 2 stage commands, in English.
  4. Medically stable.
  5. Age > 21 years.
  6. Impaired ambulation as follows: inability to flex the knee and ankle in the sagittal plane, in a normal manner so the foot clears the floor, inability to control normal knee angle during single limb weight bearing during stance phase .
  7. Minimum trace (Manual Muscle Test score of 1) contraction of hip, knee, and ankle flexors and extensors under volitional control.
  8. Passive range of motion at hip, knee, ankle normal gait kinematics.
  9. Five degrees (5°) of motion for knee and ankle flexors and extensors produced by muscle stimulation achieved non-invasively with electrical stimulation applied to the skin surface.
  10. At least 12 months post stroke.
  11. Ability to understand the informed consent form in English.
  12. Thigh and lower leg circumference and length ≤ 50th percentile of standard U.S. population morphology measures.*
  13. Participants should be able to walk and keep balance without physical assistance
  14. Response to Surface Stimulation at a trace for tibialis anterior and peronous longus.
  15. Subject with unilateral defects

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Acute or progressive cardiac, renal, respiratory, neurological disorders or malignancy.
  2. Active psychiatric diagnosis or psychological condition, or active drug/alcohol abuse.
  3. Lower motor neuron damage or radiculopathy.
  4. More than one stroke.
  5. Allergy or contraindication to the anesthesia, Versed, (or comparable substitute).

Sites / Locations

  • VA Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Implanted

Arm Description

All participants.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change from baseline to Month 24 of swing phase gait components and knee control during stance phase with 6 gait components.
The six gait components listed below: Ankle plantar-flexion at Heel Strike Ankle Dorsiflexion during Peak Swing Knee Flexion at Toe Off Knee Flexion Peak Swing Knee Extension at Heel Strike Knee Flexion at Mid Stance

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change from baseline to Month 24, without stimulation, of four scales and two QOL questionnaires.
The four scales are:Six Minute Walk Test, Manual Muscle Test, Fugl-Meyer Coordination Scale, and the Ashworth Scale. The two QOL questionnaires are: Craig Handicap Assessment & Reporting Technique (CHART) and Stroke Impact Scale (SIS):

Full Information

First Posted
June 22, 2011
Last Updated
January 23, 2017
Sponsor
The Alfred E. Mann Foundation for Scientific Research
Collaborators
VA Office of Research and Development
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01640041
Brief Title
Feasibility Study for Enhancing Gait Following Stroke With Implanted Microstimulators
Official Title
Feasibility Study for Enhancing Gait Following Stroke With Implanted Microstimulators
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2012
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 2008 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2009 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 2010 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
The Alfred E. Mann Foundation for Scientific Research
Collaborators
VA Office of Research and Development

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to test an innovative, advanced FNS microstimulator technology developed by the Alfred Mann Foundation (Santa Clarita, CA) called, the Radio Frequency Microstimulation (RFM) Gait System that promises to provide FNS training for restoration of functional gait components in a manner at least as efficacious as current investigational FNS systems. The design features of the RFM Gait System are intended to address the problems with the current FNS systems. The RFM implant devices are small enough to be inserted using only a 5 mm incision[3]. Because both the electrode (anode and cathode) are contained within the microstimulator, there are no lead wires traversing the skin, joints, or torso/limb junctures. Individual RFMs can be inserted at the motor points and nerves of each of the paretic muscles in the involved limb and coordinated using radio frequency technology.
Detailed Description
The primary objective (Aim I) of this study is to evaluate whether the RFM Gait System can restore the capability to perform the components of gait required for safe, functional walking, for patients in the chronic phase after stroke (> 12 months). We will assess the treatment provided by the RFM system at the Cleveland VA compared to the FNS percutaneous Schreiner electrodes and custom-designed controller previously investigated by the investigators. The similarities between the RFM-based and percutaneous FNS systems will be assessed using six gait components required for the execution of functional, safe gait, which are lower limb strength, coordination, an index of walking endurance, muscle tone, walking speed, and quality of life. The secondary objective of this study is to test the technological performance and safety of the RFM Gait System. Measures of technology performance and safety include implantation time; anchoring capability at the motor point of the muscle; reliability of the RFMs during use; reliability of electrical performance of the system; comfort of the system (with stimulation off); comfort of the electrical stimulus.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hemiparesis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Device Feasibility
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
1 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Implanted
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
All participants.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Radio-frequency Microstiumulator
Other Intervention Name(s)
The specific device name is the Radio Frequency Microstiumlator (RFM) System.
Intervention Description
All participants will receive leg implants and will be trained first in the clinical and subsequently perform stimulation-assisted exercises in the home - for an overall duration of 6 months post-implant. Subsequently, exercise programs will continue without stimulation. Patient condition will be assessed at 9, 12 and 24 months post-implant.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change from baseline to Month 24 of swing phase gait components and knee control during stance phase with 6 gait components.
Description
The six gait components listed below: Ankle plantar-flexion at Heel Strike Ankle Dorsiflexion during Peak Swing Knee Flexion at Toe Off Knee Flexion Peak Swing Knee Extension at Heel Strike Knee Flexion at Mid Stance
Time Frame
24 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change from baseline to Month 24, without stimulation, of four scales and two QOL questionnaires.
Description
The four scales are:Six Minute Walk Test, Manual Muscle Test, Fugl-Meyer Coordination Scale, and the Ashworth Scale. The two QOL questionnaires are: Craig Handicap Assessment & Reporting Technique (CHART) and Stroke Impact Scale (SIS):
Time Frame
24 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
21 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Cognition intact to give valid informed consent to participate. Sufficient endurance to participate in rehabilitation sessions. Ability to follow 2 stage commands, in English. Medically stable. Age > 21 years. Impaired ambulation as follows: inability to flex the knee and ankle in the sagittal plane, in a normal manner so the foot clears the floor, inability to control normal knee angle during single limb weight bearing during stance phase . Minimum trace (Manual Muscle Test score of 1) contraction of hip, knee, and ankle flexors and extensors under volitional control. Passive range of motion at hip, knee, ankle normal gait kinematics. Five degrees (5°) of motion for knee and ankle flexors and extensors produced by muscle stimulation achieved non-invasively with electrical stimulation applied to the skin surface. At least 12 months post stroke. Ability to understand the informed consent form in English. Thigh and lower leg circumference and length ≤ 50th percentile of standard U.S. population morphology measures.* Participants should be able to walk and keep balance without physical assistance Response to Surface Stimulation at a trace for tibialis anterior and peronous longus. Subject with unilateral defects Exclusion Criteria: Acute or progressive cardiac, renal, respiratory, neurological disorders or malignancy. Active psychiatric diagnosis or psychological condition, or active drug/alcohol abuse. Lower motor neuron damage or radiculopathy. More than one stroke. Allergy or contraindication to the anesthesia, Versed, (or comparable substitute).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Janis J Daly, PhD, MSPT
Organizational Affiliation
Cleveland VA Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Robert Ruff, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Cleveland VA Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
VA Medical Center
City
Cleveland
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
44106
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
16322492
Citation
Daly JJ, Roenigk K, Holcomb J, Rogers JM, Butler K, Gansen J, McCabe J, Fredrickson E, Marsolais EB, Ruff RL. A randomized controlled trial of functional neuromuscular stimulation in chronic stroke subjects. Stroke. 2006 Jan;37(1):172-8. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000195129.95220.77. Epub 2005 Dec 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15465093
Citation
Daly JJ, Ruff RL. Feasibility of combining multi-channel functional neuromuscular stimulation with weight-supported treadmill training. J Neurol Sci. 2004 Oct 15;225(1-2):105-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jns.2004.07.006.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11732829
Citation
Daly JJ, Kollar K, Debogorski AA, Strasshofer B, Marsolais EB, Scheiner A, Snyder S, Ruff RL. Performance of an intramuscular electrode during functional neuromuscular stimulation for gait training post stroke. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2001 Sep-Oct;38(5):513-26.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Feasibility Study for Enhancing Gait Following Stroke With Implanted Microstimulators

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs