A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Multicenter Study Comparing Continuous Diffusion of Oxygen (CDO) Therapy to Standard Moist Wound Therapy (MWT) in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
Primary Purpose
Diabetic Foot Ulcer
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
CDO electrochemical tissue oxygenation system
Moist Wound Therapy
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Diabetic Foot Ulcer focused on measuring Diabetic Foot Ulcer
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Subjects 30-90 years of age at the time of Informed Consent
- Subjects with type 1 or type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with a non-healing, full-thickness, University of Texas Classification of Diabetic Foot Ulcers Class IA diabetic foot ulcers
- Subjects who have an ulcer with a duration of at least 4 weeks, but not greater than 52 weeks at time of screening
- Subjects with an index ulcer measuring between 1 - 10 cm2 in area after debridement (Area = length x width)
- Subjects with a diabetic foot ulcer(s) at or below the malleoli
Subjects who demonstrates adequate arterial perfusion defined as either:
- transcutaneous oxygen measurements of the dorsum of the foot > 30 mm Hg with a skin perfusion pressure > 30 mm Hg, or an ankle/brachial index (ABI) above 0.7, with documented confirmation of adequate arterial perfusion, or
- a Doppler waveform consistent with adequate flow in the foot (biphasic or triphasic waveforms) at screening, or
- absolute toe pressure of > 30 mm Hg
- Subject and/or caregiver must be able and willing to learn and perform the duties of dressing changes
- Subjects are able and willing to comply with standardized off-loading regimen (such as a fixed ankle walker)
Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects < 30 or > 90 years of age at the time of Informed Consent
- Subjects with Target Ulcers with a duration < 4 weeks or > 52 weeks
- Subjects with ulcers measuring less than 1 cm2 or greater than 10 cm2 in area (Area = length x width) after debridement at the time of screening
- Subjects whose ulcer decreased in area by > 30 % during the 1 week screening period
- Subjects with evidence of gangrene on any part of affected limb
- Subjects with active Charcot's foot on the study limb
- Subjects scheduled to undergo vascular surgery, angioplasty or thrombolysis at the time of enrollment
- Subjects with active infection at the time of screening
- Subjects with a target ulcer which has exposed tendons, ligaments, muscle, or bone
- Subjects with active malignancy, excluding non-melanoma skin cancer
- Subjects with a history of malignancy on study limb
- Subjects in whom oral, or IV antibiotic/antimicrobial agents or medications have been used within 2 days (48 hours) of baseline
- Subjects who are currently receiving or has received radiation or chemotherapy within 3 months of randomization
- Subjects who have received growth factor therapy (e.g., autologous platelet-rich plasma gel, becaplermin, bilayered cell therapy, dermal substitute, extracellular matrix) within two weeks of screening
- Subjects who are pregnant at the time of screening
- Subjects who are undergoing active renal dialysis
- Subjects who have a known immune insufficiency, excluding Diabetes Mellitus
- Subjects with a history of peripheral vascular repair within 14 days of screening
- Subjects with a current deep vein thrombosis (DVT)
- Subjects with ulcers due to Raynaud's disease
- Subjects with and ulcer due to acute thrombophlebitis
- Subjects with inadequate perfusion to support healing
- Subjects with necrotic wounds covered with eschar or slough
- Subjects with wounds with fistulae or deep sinus tracts of unknown depth
- Subjects who are receiving palliative care
- Subjects who have a HbA1c > 12% (uncontrolled hyperglycemia)
- Subjects whose target ulcer has a known etiology of: malignancy, burn, collagen vascular disease, sickle cell, vasculopathy, or pyoderma gangrenosum
- Subjects with a documented history of alcohol or substance abuse within 6 months of screening
- Subjects who are currently enrolled or who have participated, within 30 days of screening, in another investigational device, drug or biological trial that may interfere with study results
- Subjects with a known allergy to dressing materials, including occlusive dressings and the adhesives on such dressings
Sites / Locations
- Clinical Trials of Texas, Inc., dba Clinical Trials of Arizona, Inc.
- Associated Foot and Ankle Specialists
- Southern Arizona VA Health Care System
- Sacramento Foot & Ankle Center
- Roy O. Kroeker, DPM , Inc.
- Limb Preservation Platform
- Center for Clinical Research, Inc
- The Research Center
- Phoenix Medical Research
- Doctors Research Network
- Orthopedic Research Institute
- Aiyan Diabetes Center
- Foot and Ankle Specialists of the Mid-Atlantic
- Foot and Ankle Specialists of the Mid-Atlantic
- Foot and Ankle Specialists of the Mid-Atlantic
- Clinical Research Medical Center
- PMG Research of Wilmington, LLC
- Clinical Research Associates of Central PA
- Richard C. Galperin, DPM, PA
- William Blake Partners, LLC
- Houston Foot & Ankle
- Complete Family Foot Care
- Alamo Clinical Research
- Clinical Trials of Texas
- The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Sham Comparator
Arm Label
CDO with standard MWT
Moist Wound Therapy
Arm Description
CDO (continuously supply pure oxygen) with standard Moist Wound Therapy
Moist Wound Therapy. De-activated Sham device placed to wound in order to blind patient and study staff.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Complete (100%) wound closure defined as complete re-epithelialization without drainage
Complete (100%) wound closure defined as complete re-epithelialization without drainage before or at week 12
Secondary Outcome Measures
Time to 50%, 75% and 100% wound closure
Time to 50%, 75% and 100% wound closure by using digital photography & computerized planimetric analysis
Pain Reduction
Pain Reduction from day 0 to week 12 or closure using the Wong-Baker Faces™ Pain Rating Scale
Quality of Life
Quality of Life improvement from day 0 to week 12 or closure using the Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale - Short form
Epithelial tissue development
Epithelial tissue development from day 0 to week 12 or closure using the Bates-Jensen Assessment Tool Score
Granulation tissue development
Granulation tissue development from day 0 to week 12 or closure using the Bates-Jensen Assessment Tool Score
Total Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool Score
Total Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool Score from day 0 to week 12 or closure
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01645891
First Posted
July 18, 2012
Last Updated
February 8, 2017
Sponsor
Electrochemical Oxygen Concepts, Inc.
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01645891
Brief Title
A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Multicenter Study Comparing Continuous Diffusion of Oxygen (CDO) Therapy to Standard Moist Wound Therapy (MWT) in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
Official Title
TCO2-2012-01 A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Multicenter Study Comparing Continuous Diffusion of Oxygen (CDO) Therapy to Standard Moist Wound Therapy (MWT) in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
February 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2012 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
November 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 2016 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Electrochemical Oxygen Concepts, Inc.
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of Continuous Diffusion of Oxygen (CDO) therapy for the treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers. The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of CDO in combination with standard moist wound therapy (MWT) on wound healing as compared to standard MWT alone.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Diabetic Foot Ulcer
Keywords
Diabetic Foot Ulcer
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
146 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
CDO with standard MWT
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
CDO (continuously supply pure oxygen) with standard Moist Wound Therapy
Arm Title
Moist Wound Therapy
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
Moist Wound Therapy. De-activated Sham device placed to wound in order to blind patient and study staff.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
CDO electrochemical tissue oxygenation system
Other Intervention Name(s)
TransCu O2® device, CDO Therapy
Intervention Description
The TransCu O2® device is a non-invasive, electrochemical tissue oxygenation system intended for use with lower-cost wound dressings for the treatment of chronic wounds such as diabetic foot ulcers, venous leg ulcers, pressure ulcers and other skin wounds through the continuous diffusion of oxygen (CDO). The goal of CDO therapy is to continuously supply pure oxygen to an oxygen-compromised wound to aid in wound healing
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Moist Wound Therapy
Intervention Description
Moist Wound Therapy in combination with sham or deactivated device
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Complete (100%) wound closure defined as complete re-epithelialization without drainage
Description
Complete (100%) wound closure defined as complete re-epithelialization without drainage before or at week 12
Time Frame
12 weeks or wound closure
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time to 50%, 75% and 100% wound closure
Description
Time to 50%, 75% and 100% wound closure by using digital photography & computerized planimetric analysis
Time Frame
12 weeks or wound closure
Title
Pain Reduction
Description
Pain Reduction from day 0 to week 12 or closure using the Wong-Baker Faces™ Pain Rating Scale
Time Frame
12 weeks or closure
Title
Quality of Life
Description
Quality of Life improvement from day 0 to week 12 or closure using the Diabetic Foot Ulcer Scale - Short form
Time Frame
week 12 or wound closure
Title
Epithelial tissue development
Description
Epithelial tissue development from day 0 to week 12 or closure using the Bates-Jensen Assessment Tool Score
Time Frame
week 12 or wound closure
Title
Granulation tissue development
Description
Granulation tissue development from day 0 to week 12 or closure using the Bates-Jensen Assessment Tool Score
Time Frame
week 12 or wound closure
Title
Total Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool Score
Description
Total Bates-Jensen Wound Assessment Tool Score from day 0 to week 12 or closure
Time Frame
week 12 or wound closure
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
30 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
90 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Subjects 30-90 years of age at the time of Informed Consent
Subjects with type 1 or type 2 Diabetes Mellitus with a non-healing, full-thickness, University of Texas Classification of Diabetic Foot Ulcers Class IA diabetic foot ulcers
Subjects who have an ulcer with a duration of at least 4 weeks, but not greater than 52 weeks at time of screening
Subjects with an index ulcer measuring between 1 - 10 cm2 in area after debridement (Area = length x width)
Subjects with a diabetic foot ulcer(s) at or below the malleoli
Subjects who demonstrates adequate arterial perfusion defined as either:
transcutaneous oxygen measurements of the dorsum of the foot > 30 mm Hg with a skin perfusion pressure > 30 mm Hg, or an ankle/brachial index (ABI) above 0.7, with documented confirmation of adequate arterial perfusion, or
a Doppler waveform consistent with adequate flow in the foot (biphasic or triphasic waveforms) at screening, or
absolute toe pressure of > 30 mm Hg
Subject and/or caregiver must be able and willing to learn and perform the duties of dressing changes
Subjects are able and willing to comply with standardized off-loading regimen (such as a fixed ankle walker)
Exclusion Criteria:
Subjects < 30 or > 90 years of age at the time of Informed Consent
Subjects with Target Ulcers with a duration < 4 weeks or > 52 weeks
Subjects with ulcers measuring less than 1 cm2 or greater than 10 cm2 in area (Area = length x width) after debridement at the time of screening
Subjects whose ulcer decreased in area by > 30 % during the 1 week screening period
Subjects with evidence of gangrene on any part of affected limb
Subjects with active Charcot's foot on the study limb
Subjects scheduled to undergo vascular surgery, angioplasty or thrombolysis at the time of enrollment
Subjects with active infection at the time of screening
Subjects with a target ulcer which has exposed tendons, ligaments, muscle, or bone
Subjects with active malignancy, excluding non-melanoma skin cancer
Subjects with a history of malignancy on study limb
Subjects in whom oral, or IV antibiotic/antimicrobial agents or medications have been used within 2 days (48 hours) of baseline
Subjects who are currently receiving or has received radiation or chemotherapy within 3 months of randomization
Subjects who have received growth factor therapy (e.g., autologous platelet-rich plasma gel, becaplermin, bilayered cell therapy, dermal substitute, extracellular matrix) within two weeks of screening
Subjects who are pregnant at the time of screening
Subjects who are undergoing active renal dialysis
Subjects who have a known immune insufficiency, excluding Diabetes Mellitus
Subjects with a history of peripheral vascular repair within 14 days of screening
Subjects with a current deep vein thrombosis (DVT)
Subjects with ulcers due to Raynaud's disease
Subjects with and ulcer due to acute thrombophlebitis
Subjects with inadequate perfusion to support healing
Subjects with necrotic wounds covered with eschar or slough
Subjects with wounds with fistulae or deep sinus tracts of unknown depth
Subjects who are receiving palliative care
Subjects who have a HbA1c > 12% (uncontrolled hyperglycemia)
Subjects whose target ulcer has a known etiology of: malignancy, burn, collagen vascular disease, sickle cell, vasculopathy, or pyoderma gangrenosum
Subjects with a documented history of alcohol or substance abuse within 6 months of screening
Subjects who are currently enrolled or who have participated, within 30 days of screening, in another investigational device, drug or biological trial that may interfere with study results
Subjects with a known allergy to dressing materials, including occlusive dressings and the adhesives on such dressings
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
David G Armstrong, DPM, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Southern Arizona Limb Salvage Alliance (SALSA)
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Clinical Trials of Texas, Inc., dba Clinical Trials of Arizona, Inc.
City
Glendale
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85306
Country
United States
Facility Name
Associated Foot and Ankle Specialists
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85015
Country
United States
Facility Name
Southern Arizona VA Health Care System
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85723
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sacramento Foot & Ankle Center
City
Fair Oaks
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95628
Country
United States
Facility Name
Roy O. Kroeker, DPM , Inc.
City
Fresno
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
93710
Country
United States
Facility Name
Limb Preservation Platform
City
Fresno
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
93721
Country
United States
Facility Name
Center for Clinical Research, Inc
City
San Francisco
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94115
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Research Center
City
Hialeah
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33013
Country
United States
Facility Name
Phoenix Medical Research
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33165
Country
United States
Facility Name
Doctors Research Network
City
South Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33143
Country
United States
Facility Name
Orthopedic Research Institute
City
West Palm Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33406
Country
United States
Facility Name
Aiyan Diabetes Center
City
Martinez
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30907
Country
United States
Facility Name
Foot and Ankle Specialists of the Mid-Atlantic
City
Annapolis
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21401
Country
United States
Facility Name
Foot and Ankle Specialists of the Mid-Atlantic
City
Kensington
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
20895
Country
United States
Facility Name
Foot and Ankle Specialists of the Mid-Atlantic
City
Pasadena
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21122
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Research Medical Center
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89106
Country
United States
Facility Name
PMG Research of Wilmington, LLC
City
Wilmington
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28401
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Research Associates of Central PA
City
Altoona
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
16602
Country
United States
Facility Name
Richard C. Galperin, DPM, PA
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75224
Country
United States
Facility Name
William Blake Partners, LLC
City
Grapevine
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76051
Country
United States
Facility Name
Houston Foot & Ankle
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77074
Country
United States
Facility Name
Complete Family Foot Care
City
McAllen
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78501
Country
United States
Facility Name
Alamo Clinical Research
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78212
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Trials of Texas
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78229
Country
United States
Facility Name
The University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78229
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blind Multicenter Study Comparing Continuous Diffusion of Oxygen (CDO) Therapy to Standard Moist Wound Therapy (MWT) in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcers
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs