search
Back to results

Screening for Colorectal Cancer With FOBT, Virtual Colonoscopy and Optical Colonoscopy. A Randomized Clinical Trial in the Florence District (SAVE)

Primary Purpose

Colorectal Cancer

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Italy
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Invitation to screening
Sponsored by
Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, Italy
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional screening trial for Colorectal Cancer focused on measuring Colorectal Cancer, Screening, Fecal Occult Blood Test, CT Colonography, Virtual Colonoscopy, Colonoscopy

Eligibility Criteria

55 Years - 64 Years (Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Never invited to previous colorectal cancer screening.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Personal history of colorectal cancer or colonic advanced adenomas.
  • Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD).
  • Previous five years complete colonoscopy or previous two years faecal occult blood test (FOBT).

Sites / Locations

  • Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, ISPO

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Computed tomographic colonography (CTC), reduced prep

Computed tomographic colonography (CTC), standard prep

Faecal occult blood test (FOBT)

Colonoscopy

Arm Description

Subjects invited to undergo CTC with reduced cathartic preparation

Subjects invited to undergo CTC with standard bowel preparation

Subjects invited to undergo FOBT

Subjects invited to undergo colonoscopy

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Participation rate to faecal occult blood test (FOBT), computed tomographic colonography (CTC) and colonoscopy
Detection rate for cancer or advanced adenomas of CTC versus three rounds of FOBT every second year
Referral rate for colonoscopy induced by primary CTC versus three rounds of FOBT every second year
Costs of the three different screening strategies proposed

Secondary Outcome Measures

Expected and perceived burden of colonoscopy and CTC
Number and type of complications in all groups

Full Information

First Posted
July 20, 2012
Last Updated
November 25, 2018
Sponsor
Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, Italy
Collaborators
University of Florence
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01651624
Brief Title
Screening for Colorectal Cancer With FOBT, Virtual Colonoscopy and Optical Colonoscopy. A Randomized Clinical Trial in the Florence District
Acronym
SAVE
Official Title
Comparison Between Faecal Occult Blood Test (FOBT), Computed Tomographic Colonography (CTC) With Computer Aided Diagnosis (CAD) and Colonoscopy as a Primary Screening Test for Colorectal Cancer. Validation of a Teleradiology Model. Biological Banking in Subjects Recruited for Colonoscopy or CTC.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 2012 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
November 25, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 25, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, Italy
Collaborators
University of Florence

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Computed tomographic colonography (CTC) has proven to be accurate in detecting colorectal neoplasms and may be a primary test in colorectal cancer screening. PURPOSE: This clinical trial will compare participation rate, diagnostic yield and costs of computed tomographic colonography, faecal occult blood test (FOBT) and colonoscopy (CO) as a primary screening test in a population-based programme.
Detailed Description
OBJECTIVES: Primary objectives: To compare the participation rate to faecal occult blood test (FOBT), computed tomographic colonography (CTC) and colonoscopy (CO) as a primary screening test in a population-based programme for colorectal cancer. To compare the participation rate to CTC with reduced cathartic preparation versus CTC with standard bowel preparation. To compare the detection rate for cancer or advanced adenomas of CTC with computer aided diagnosis (CAD) versus three rounds of FOBT every second year. To evaluate referral rate for colonoscopy induced by primary CTC versus three rounds of FOBT every second year. To compare costs of the three screening strategies. Secondary objectives: To compare the expected and perceived discomfort of colonoscopy and computed tomographic colonography as assessed with a structured questionnaire. To evaluate the rate of complications in each group. To validate a teleradiology model for computed tomographic colonography. To create a biological bank of blood and stool specimens from subjects who undergo computed tomographic colonography, primary colonoscopy and second level colonoscopy. DESIGN: 14,000 subjects aged 55-64 years, living in the Florence District and never screened for colorectal cancer, will be randomized in 3 arms: group 1 (5,000 persons) invited to CTC (divided into: subgroup 1A with reduced cathartic preparation and subgroup 1B with standard bowel preparation); group 2 (8,000 persons) invited to biannual FOBT for 3 rounds; group 3 (1,000 persons) invited to CO. Subjects of each group will be invited by mail to undergo the selected test. Individuals of each group will receive an invitation letter and an information leaflet, containing information about colorectal cancer, importance of screening, and advantages and possible risks of the selected test. Invitation letter for the FOBT group contains instructions on how to pick-up the kit test at the nearest pharmacy. The FOBT screening test adopted is OC-SENSOR DIANA (Eiken Chemical Co., Tokyo, Japan), a quantitative, completely automated immunochemical test, based on latex agglutination. Positivity threshold is set at 100 ng/ml of sample solution. Invited subjects are asked to collect a single sample of faeces, without dietary restrictions. Sample are retuned according to the routine procedure of Florence screening programme. Invitation letter for CTC and colonoscopy contains a phone number and an email address of the screening centre. All invitees have the option to call or send an email to the screening centre in order to receive an appointment for a prior consultation. All non-responders will receive a remainder by mail after three months. Non-responders to reminder will be invited to FOBT according with current screening procedure. Subjects who accept invitation for CTC or CO will have a consultation at the screening centre with a trained nurse. During the consultation subjects will be informed about the study protocol, the screening examination to which they are invited, the bowel preparation, and the management in case of positive results. All subjects tested positive to FOBT or CTC (mass or at least one polyp ≥ 6 mm) will be invited to undergo total colonoscopy. Then, subjects will be scheduled for the selected examination (CTC or CO).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Colorectal Cancer
Keywords
Colorectal Cancer, Screening, Fecal Occult Blood Test, CT Colonography, Virtual Colonoscopy, Colonoscopy

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Screening
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
16087 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Computed tomographic colonography (CTC), reduced prep
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subjects invited to undergo CTC with reduced cathartic preparation
Arm Title
Computed tomographic colonography (CTC), standard prep
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subjects invited to undergo CTC with standard bowel preparation
Arm Title
Faecal occult blood test (FOBT)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects invited to undergo FOBT
Arm Title
Colonoscopy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subjects invited to undergo colonoscopy
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Invitation to screening
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Participation rate to faecal occult blood test (FOBT), computed tomographic colonography (CTC) and colonoscopy
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Detection rate for cancer or advanced adenomas of CTC versus three rounds of FOBT every second year
Time Frame
6 years
Title
Referral rate for colonoscopy induced by primary CTC versus three rounds of FOBT every second year
Time Frame
6 years
Title
Costs of the three different screening strategies proposed
Time Frame
6 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Expected and perceived burden of colonoscopy and CTC
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Number and type of complications in all groups
Time Frame
2 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
55 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
64 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Never invited to previous colorectal cancer screening. Exclusion Criteria: Personal history of colorectal cancer or colonic advanced adenomas. Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Previous five years complete colonoscopy or previous two years faecal occult blood test (FOBT).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Stefano Milani, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Florence
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Grazia Grazzini, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, Italy
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Cancer Prevention and Research Institute, ISPO
City
Firenze
State/Province
FI
ZIP/Postal Code
50139
Country
Italy

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
36116454
Citation
Sali L, Ventura L, Mascalchi M, Falchini M, Mallardi B, Carozzi F, Milani S, Zappa M, Grazzini G, Mantellini P. Single CT colonography versus three rounds of faecal immunochemical test for population-based screening of colorectal cancer (SAVE): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Nov;7(11):1016-1023. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00269-2. Epub 2022 Sep 16.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
23497601
Citation
Sali L, Grazzini G, Carozzi F, Castiglione G, Falchini M, Mallardi B, Mantellini P, Ventura L, Regge D, Zappa M, Mascalchi M, Milani S. Screening for colorectal cancer with FOBT, virtual colonoscopy and optical colonoscopy: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial in the Florence district (SAVE study). Trials. 2013 Mar 15;14:74. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-14-74.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Screening for Colorectal Cancer With FOBT, Virtual Colonoscopy and Optical Colonoscopy. A Randomized Clinical Trial in the Florence District

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs