The Clinician-Administered PTSD scale (CAPS) change from week 0
This is a standardized structured, clinician administered interview that includes both questions confirming the diagnosis of PTSD (CAPSDx) as well as symptom severity over specified time periods (lifetime, past week or past month) based on the 17 symptoms of PTSD in DSM-III/II-R and IV across clusters of recurrence, avoidance/numbing and hyper-arousal symptoms (CAPS1-17 or CAPSSx).
The Clinician-Administered PTSD scale (CAPS) change from week 0
This is a standardized structured, clinician administered interview that includes both questions confirming the diagnosis of PTSD (CAPSDx) as well as symptom severity over specified time periods (lifetime, past week or past month) based on the 17 symptoms of PTSD in DSM-III/II-R and IV across clusters of recurrence, avoidance/numbing and hyper-arousal symptoms (CAPS1-17 or CAPSSx).
The Clinician-Administered PTSD scale (CAPS) change from week 0
This is a standardized structured, clinician administered interview that includes both questions confirming the diagnosis of PTSD (CAPSDx) as well as symptom severity over specified time periods (lifetime, past week or past month) based on the 17 symptoms of PTSD in DSM-III/II-R and IV across clusters of recurrence, avoidance/numbing and hyper-arousal symptoms (CAPS1-17 or CAPSSx).
The Clinician-Administered PTSD scale (CAPS) change from week 0
This is a standardized structured, clinician administered interview that includes both questions confirming the diagnosis of PTSD (CAPSDx) as well as symptom severity over specified time periods (lifetime, past week or past month) based on the 17 symptoms of PTSD in DSM-III/II-R and IV across clusters of recurrence, avoidance/numbing and hyper-arousal symptoms (CAPS1-17 or CAPSSx).
The Clinician-Administered PTSD scale (CAPS) change from week 0
This is a standardized structured, clinician administered interview that includes both questions confirming the diagnosis of PTSD (CAPSDx) as well as symptom severity over specified time periods (lifetime, past week or past month) based on the 17 symptoms of PTSD in DSM-III/II-R and IV across clusters of recurrence, avoidance/numbing and hyper-arousal symptoms (CAPS1-17 or CAPSSx).
The Clinician-Administered PTSD scale (CAPS) change from week 0
This is a standardized structured, clinician administered interview that includes both questions confirming the diagnosis of PTSD (CAPSDx) as well as symptom severity over specified time periods (lifetime, past week or past month) based on the 17 symptoms of PTSD in DSM-III/II-R and IV across clusters of recurrence, avoidance/numbing and hyper-arousal symptoms (CAPS1-17 or CAPSSx).
The Clinician-Administered PTSD scale (CAPS) change from week 0
This is a standardized structured, clinician administered interview that includes both questions confirming the diagnosis of PTSD (CAPSDx) as well as symptom severity over specified time periods (lifetime, past week or past month) based on the 17 symptoms of PTSD in DSM-III/II-R and IV across clusters of recurrence, avoidance/numbing and hyper-arousal symptoms (CAPS1-17 or CAPSSx).
The Clinician-Administered PTSD scale (CAPS) change from week 0
This is a standardized structured, clinician administered interview that includes both questions confirming the diagnosis of PTSD (CAPSDx) as well as symptom severity over specified time periods (lifetime, past week or past month) based on the 17 symptoms of PTSD in DSM-III/II-R and IV across clusters of recurrence, avoidance/numbing and hyper-arousal symptoms (CAPS1-17 or CAPSSx).
The Clinician-Administered PTSD scale (CAPS) change from week 0
This is a standardized structured, clinician administered interview that includes both questions confirming the diagnosis of PTSD (CAPSDx) as well as symptom severity over specified time periods (lifetime, past week or past month) based on the 17 symptoms of PTSD in DSM-III/II-R and IV across clusters of recurrence, avoidance/numbing and hyper-arousal symptoms (CAPS1-17 or CAPSSx).
The Clinician-Administered PTSD scale (CAPS) change from week 0
This is a standardized structured, clinician administered interview that includes both questions confirming the diagnosis of PTSD (CAPSDx) as well as symptom severity over specified time periods (lifetime, past week or past month) based on the 17 symptoms of PTSD in DSM-III/II-R and IV across clusters of recurrence, avoidance/numbing and hyper-arousal symptoms (CAPS1-17 or CAPSSx).
The Clinician-Administered PTSD scale (CAPS) change from week 0
This is a standardized structured, clinician administered interview that includes both questions confirming the diagnosis of PTSD (CAPSDx) as well as symptom severity over specified time periods (lifetime, past week or past month) based on the 17 symptoms of PTSD in DSM-III/II-R and IV across clusters of recurrence, avoidance/numbing and hyper-arousal symptoms (CAPS1-17 or CAPSSx).
The Clinician-Administered PTSD scale (CAPS) change from week 0
This is a standardized structured, clinician administered interview that includes both questions confirming the diagnosis of PTSD (CAPSDx) as well as symptom severity over specified time periods (lifetime, past week or past month) based on the 17 symptoms of PTSD in DSM-III/II-R and IV across clusters of recurrence, avoidance/numbing and hyper-arousal symptoms (CAPS1-17 or CAPSSx).
The Clinician-Administered PTSD scale (CAPS) change from week 0
This is a standardized structured, clinician administered interview that includes both questions confirming the diagnosis of PTSD (CAPSDx) as well as symptom severity over specified time periods (lifetime, past week or past month) based on the 17 symptoms of PTSD in DSM-III/II-R and IV across clusters of recurrence, avoidance/numbing and hyper-arousal symptoms (CAPS1-17 or CAPSSx).
The Clinician-Administered PTSD scale (CAPS) change from week 0
This is a standardized structured, clinician administered interview that includes both questions confirming the diagnosis of PTSD (CAPSDx) as well as symptom severity over specified time periods (lifetime, past week or past month) based on the 17 symptoms of PTSD in DSM-III/II-R and IV across clusters of recurrence, avoidance/numbing and hyper-arousal symptoms (CAPS1-17 or CAPSSx).
The Clinician-Administered PTSD scale (CAPS) change from week 0
This is a standardized structured, clinician administered interview that includes both questions confirming the diagnosis of PTSD (CAPSDx) as well as symptom severity over specified time periods (lifetime, past week or past month) based on the 17 symptoms of PTSD in DSM-III/II-R and IV across clusters of recurrence, avoidance/numbing and hyper-arousal symptoms (CAPS1-17 or CAPSSx).
The Clinician-Administered PTSD scale (CAPS) change from week 0
This is a standardized structured, clinician administered interview that includes both questions confirming the diagnosis of PTSD (CAPSDx) as well as symptom severity over specified time periods (lifetime, past week or past month) based on the 17 symptoms of PTSD in DSM-III/II-R and IV across clusters of recurrence, avoidance/numbing and hyper-arousal symptoms (CAPS1-17 or CAPSSx).
The Clinician-Administered PTSD scale (CAPS) change from week 0
This is a standardized structured, clinician administered interview that includes both questions confirming the diagnosis of PTSD (CAPSDx) as well as symptom severity over specified time periods (lifetime, past week or past month) based on the 17 symptoms of PTSD in DSM-III/II-R and IV across clusters of recurrence, avoidance/numbing and hyper-arousal symptoms (CAPS1-17 or CAPSSx).
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) change from week 0
Clinician administered scale to rate cross-sectional severity of generalized anxiety symptoms
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) change from week 0
Clinician administered scale to rate cross-sectional severity of generalized anxiety symptoms
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) change from week 0
Clinician administered scale to rate cross-sectional severity of generalized anxiety symptoms
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) change from week 0
Clinician administered scale to rate cross-sectional severity of generalized anxiety symptoms
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) change from week 0
Clinician administered scale to rate cross-sectional severity of generalized anxiety symptoms
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) change from week 0
Clinician administered scale to rate cross-sectional severity of generalized anxiety symptoms
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) change from week 0
Clinician administered scale to rate cross-sectional severity of generalized anxiety symptoms
Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) change from week 0
Clinician administered scale to rate cross-sectional severity of generalized anxiety symptoms
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) change from week 0
The MADRS is a 10 item clinician administered rating instrument with each item rated on a 7 point (0-6) scale to evaluate the severity of depressive symptoms in patients diagnosed with a depressive disorder. It is designed to evaluate for change in depressive state during treatment. Total scores range from 0-52 with score interpretation of: 7 recovered, 15 mild depression, 25 moderate depression, 31 severe and 44 very severe depression.
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) change from week 0
The MADRS is a 10 item clinician administered rating instrument with each item rated on a 7 point (0-6) scale to evaluate the severity of depressive symptoms in patients diagnosed with a depressive disorder. It is designed to evaluate for change in depressive state during treatment. Total scores range from 0-52 with score interpretation of: 7 recovered, 15 mild depression, 25 moderate depression, 31 severe and 44 very severe depression.
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) change from week 0
The MADRS is a 10 item clinician administered rating instrument with each item rated on a 7 point (0-6) scale to evaluate the severity of depressive symptoms in patients diagnosed with a depressive disorder. It is designed to evaluate for change in depressive state during treatment. Total scores range from 0-52 with score interpretation of: 7 recovered, 15 mild depression, 25 moderate depression, 31 severe and 44 very severe depression.
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) change from week 0
The MADRS is a 10 item clinician administered rating instrument with each item rated on a 7 point (0-6) scale to evaluate the severity of depressive symptoms in patients diagnosed with a depressive disorder. It is designed to evaluate for change in depressive state during treatment. Total scores range from 0-52 with score interpretation of: 7 recovered, 15 mild depression, 25 moderate depression, 31 severe and 44 very severe depression.
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) change from week 0
The MADRS is a 10 item clinician administered rating instrument with each item rated on a 7 point (0-6) scale to evaluate the severity of depressive symptoms in patients diagnosed with a depressive disorder. It is designed to evaluate for change in depressive state during treatment. Total scores range from 0-52 with score interpretation of: 7 recovered, 15 mild depression, 25 moderate depression, 31 severe and 44 very severe depression.
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) change from week 0
The MADRS is a 10 item clinician administered rating instrument with each item rated on a 7 point (0-6) scale to evaluate the severity of depressive symptoms in patients diagnosed with a depressive disorder. It is designed to evaluate for change in depressive state during treatment. Total scores range from 0-52 with score interpretation of: 7 recovered, 15 mild depression, 25 moderate depression, 31 severe and 44 very severe depression.
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) change from week 0
The MADRS is a 10 item clinician administered rating instrument with each item rated on a 7 point (0-6) scale to evaluate the severity of depressive symptoms in patients diagnosed with a depressive disorder. It is designed to evaluate for change in depressive state during treatment. Total scores range from 0-52 with score interpretation of: 7 recovered, 15 mild depression, 25 moderate depression, 31 severe and 44 very severe depression.
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) change from week 0
The MADRS is a 10 item clinician administered rating instrument with each item rated on a 7 point (0-6) scale to evaluate the severity of depressive symptoms in patients diagnosed with a depressive disorder. It is designed to evaluate for change in depressive state during treatment. Total scores range from 0-52 with score interpretation of: 7 recovered, 15 mild depression, 25 moderate depression, 31 severe and 44 very severe depression.
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) change from week 0
The MADRS is a 10 item clinician administered rating instrument with each item rated on a 7 point (0-6) scale to evaluate the severity of depressive symptoms in patients diagnosed with a depressive disorder. It is designed to evaluate for change in depressive state during treatment. Total scores range from 0-52 with score interpretation of: 7 recovered, 15 mild depression, 25 moderate depression, 31 severe and 44 very severe depression.
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) change from week 0
The MADRS is a 10 item clinician administered rating instrument with each item rated on a 7 point (0-6) scale to evaluate the severity of depressive symptoms in patients diagnosed with a depressive disorder. It is designed to evaluate for change in depressive state during treatment. Total scores range from 0-52 with score interpretation of: 7 recovered, 15 mild depression, 25 moderate depression, 31 severe and 44 very severe depression.
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) change from week 0
The MADRS is a 10 item clinician administered rating instrument with each item rated on a 7 point (0-6) scale to evaluate the severity of depressive symptoms in patients diagnosed with a depressive disorder. It is designed to evaluate for change in depressive state during treatment. Total scores range from 0-52 with score interpretation of: 7 recovered, 15 mild depression, 25 moderate depression, 31 severe and 44 very severe depression.
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) change from week 0
The MADRS is a 10 item clinician administered rating instrument with each item rated on a 7 point (0-6) scale to evaluate the severity of depressive symptoms in patients diagnosed with a depressive disorder. It is designed to evaluate for change in depressive state during treatment. Total scores range from 0-52 with score interpretation of: 7 recovered, 15 mild depression, 25 moderate depression, 31 severe and 44 very severe depression.
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) change from week 0
The MADRS is a 10 item clinician administered rating instrument with each item rated on a 7 point (0-6) scale to evaluate the severity of depressive symptoms in patients diagnosed with a depressive disorder. It is designed to evaluate for change in depressive state during treatment. Total scores range from 0-52 with score interpretation of: 7 recovered, 15 mild depression, 25 moderate depression, 31 severe and 44 very severe depression.
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) change from week 0
The MADRS is a 10 item clinician administered rating instrument with each item rated on a 7 point (0-6) scale to evaluate the severity of depressive symptoms in patients diagnosed with a depressive disorder. It is designed to evaluate for change in depressive state during treatment. Total scores range from 0-52 with score interpretation of: 7 recovered, 15 mild depression, 25 moderate depression, 31 severe and 44 very severe depression.
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) change from week 0
The MADRS is a 10 item clinician administered rating instrument with each item rated on a 7 point (0-6) scale to evaluate the severity of depressive symptoms in patients diagnosed with a depressive disorder. It is designed to evaluate for change in depressive state during treatment. Total scores range from 0-52 with score interpretation of: 7 recovered, 15 mild depression, 25 moderate depression, 31 severe and 44 very severe depression.
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) change from week 0
The MADRS is a 10 item clinician administered rating instrument with each item rated on a 7 point (0-6) scale to evaluate the severity of depressive symptoms in patients diagnosed with a depressive disorder. It is designed to evaluate for change in depressive state during treatment. Total scores range from 0-52 with score interpretation of: 7 recovered, 15 mild depression, 25 moderate depression, 31 severe and 44 very severe depression.
Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) change from week 0
The MADRS is a 10 item clinician administered rating instrument with each item rated on a 7 point (0-6) scale to evaluate the severity of depressive symptoms in patients diagnosed with a depressive disorder. It is designed to evaluate for change in depressive state during treatment. Total scores range from 0-52 with score interpretation of: 7 recovered, 15 mild depression, 25 moderate depression, 31 severe and 44 very severe depression.
Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) change from week 0
The YMRS is an 11-item clinician-administered cross-sectional rating instrument used to assess the severity of mania in patients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. The 11 items are: Elevated Mood, Increased Motor Activity/Energy, Sexual Interest, Sleep, Irritability, Speech (Rate and Amount), Language - Thought Disorder, Content, Disruptive/Aggressive Behaviour, Appearance and Insight.
Ratings are based on patient self-reporting, combined with clinician observation (accorded greater score).
Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) change from week 0
The YMRS is an 11-item clinician-administered cross-sectional rating instrument used to assess the severity of mania in patients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. The 11 items are: Elevated Mood, Increased Motor Activity/Energy, Sexual Interest, Sleep, Irritability, Speech (Rate and Amount), Language - Thought Disorder, Content, Disruptive/Aggressive Behaviour, Appearance and Insight.
Ratings are based on patient self-reporting, combined with clinician observation (accorded greater score).
Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) change from week 0
The YMRS is an 11-item clinician-administered cross-sectional rating instrument used to assess the severity of mania in patients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. The 11 items are: Elevated Mood, Increased Motor Activity/Energy, Sexual Interest, Sleep, Irritability, Speech (Rate and Amount), Language - Thought Disorder, Content, Disruptive/Aggressive Behaviour, Appearance and Insight.
Ratings are based on patient self-reporting, combined with clinician observation (accorded greater score).
Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) change from week 0
The YMRS is an 11-item clinician-administered cross-sectional rating instrument used to assess the severity of mania in patients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. The 11 items are: Elevated Mood, Increased Motor Activity/Energy, Sexual Interest, Sleep, Irritability, Speech (Rate and Amount), Language - Thought Disorder, Content, Disruptive/Aggressive Behaviour, Appearance and Insight.
Ratings are based on patient self-reporting, combined with clinician observation (accorded greater score).
Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) change from week 0
The YMRS is an 11-item clinician-administered cross-sectional rating instrument used to assess the severity of mania in patients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. The 11 items are: Elevated Mood, Increased Motor Activity/Energy, Sexual Interest, Sleep, Irritability, Speech (Rate and Amount), Language - Thought Disorder, Content, Disruptive/Aggressive Behaviour, Appearance and Insight.
Ratings are based on patient self-reporting, combined with clinician observation (accorded greater score).
Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) change from week 0
The YMRS is an 11-item clinician-administered cross-sectional rating instrument used to assess the severity of mania in patients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. The 11 items are: Elevated Mood, Increased Motor Activity/Energy, Sexual Interest, Sleep, Irritability, Speech (Rate and Amount), Language - Thought Disorder, Content, Disruptive/Aggressive Behaviour, Appearance and Insight.
Ratings are based on patient self-reporting, combined with clinician observation (accorded greater score).
Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) change from week 0
The YMRS is an 11-item clinician-administered cross-sectional rating instrument used to assess the severity of mania in patients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. The 11 items are: Elevated Mood, Increased Motor Activity/Energy, Sexual Interest, Sleep, Irritability, Speech (Rate and Amount), Language - Thought Disorder, Content, Disruptive/Aggressive Behaviour, Appearance and Insight.
Ratings are based on patient self-reporting, combined with clinician observation (accorded greater score).
Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) change from week 0
The YMRS is an 11-item clinician-administered cross-sectional rating instrument used to assess the severity of mania in patients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. The 11 items are: Elevated Mood, Increased Motor Activity/Energy, Sexual Interest, Sleep, Irritability, Speech (Rate and Amount), Language - Thought Disorder, Content, Disruptive/Aggressive Behaviour, Appearance and Insight.
Ratings are based on patient self-reporting, combined with clinician observation (accorded greater score).
Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) change from week 0
The YMRS is an 11-item clinician-administered cross-sectional rating instrument used to assess the severity of mania in patients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. The 11 items are: Elevated Mood, Increased Motor Activity/Energy, Sexual Interest, Sleep, Irritability, Speech (Rate and Amount), Language - Thought Disorder, Content, Disruptive/Aggressive Behaviour, Appearance and Insight.
Ratings are based on patient self-reporting, combined with clinician observation (accorded greater score).
Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) change from week 0
The YMRS is an 11-item clinician-administered cross-sectional rating instrument used to assess the severity of mania in patients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. The 11 items are: Elevated Mood, Increased Motor Activity/Energy, Sexual Interest, Sleep, Irritability, Speech (Rate and Amount), Language - Thought Disorder, Content, Disruptive/Aggressive Behaviour, Appearance and Insight.
Ratings are based on patient self-reporting, combined with clinician observation (accorded greater score).
Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) change from week 0
The YMRS is an 11-item clinician-administered cross-sectional rating instrument used to assess the severity of mania in patients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. The 11 items are: Elevated Mood, Increased Motor Activity/Energy, Sexual Interest, Sleep, Irritability, Speech (Rate and Amount), Language - Thought Disorder, Content, Disruptive/Aggressive Behaviour, Appearance and Insight.
Ratings are based on patient self-reporting, combined with clinician observation (accorded greater score).
Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) change from week 0
The YMRS is an 11-item clinician-administered cross-sectional rating instrument used to assess the severity of mania in patients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. The 11 items are: Elevated Mood, Increased Motor Activity/Energy, Sexual Interest, Sleep, Irritability, Speech (Rate and Amount), Language - Thought Disorder, Content, Disruptive/Aggressive Behaviour, Appearance and Insight.
Ratings are based on patient self-reporting, combined with clinician observation (accorded greater score).
Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) change from week 0
The YMRS is an 11-item clinician-administered cross-sectional rating instrument used to assess the severity of mania in patients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. The 11 items are: Elevated Mood, Increased Motor Activity/Energy, Sexual Interest, Sleep, Irritability, Speech (Rate and Amount), Language - Thought Disorder, Content, Disruptive/Aggressive Behaviour, Appearance and Insight.
Ratings are based on patient self-reporting, combined with clinician observation (accorded greater score).
Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) change from week 0
The YMRS is an 11-item clinician-administered cross-sectional rating instrument used to assess the severity of mania in patients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. The 11 items are: Elevated Mood, Increased Motor Activity/Energy, Sexual Interest, Sleep, Irritability, Speech (Rate and Amount), Language - Thought Disorder, Content, Disruptive/Aggressive Behaviour, Appearance and Insight.
Ratings are based on patient self-reporting, combined with clinician observation (accorded greater score).
Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) change from week 0
The YMRS is an 11-item clinician-administered cross-sectional rating instrument used to assess the severity of mania in patients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. The 11 items are: Elevated Mood, Increased Motor Activity/Energy, Sexual Interest, Sleep, Irritability, Speech (Rate and Amount), Language - Thought Disorder, Content, Disruptive/Aggressive Behaviour, Appearance and Insight.
Ratings are based on patient self-reporting, combined with clinician observation (accorded greater score).
Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) change from week 0
The YMRS is an 11-item clinician-administered cross-sectional rating instrument used to assess the severity of mania in patients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. The 11 items are: Elevated Mood, Increased Motor Activity/Energy, Sexual Interest, Sleep, Irritability, Speech (Rate and Amount), Language - Thought Disorder, Content, Disruptive/Aggressive Behaviour, Appearance and Insight.
Ratings are based on patient self-reporting, combined with clinician observation (accorded greater score).
Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) change from week 0
The YMRS is an 11-item clinician-administered cross-sectional rating instrument used to assess the severity of mania in patients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. The 11 items are: Elevated Mood, Increased Motor Activity/Energy, Sexual Interest, Sleep, Irritability, Speech (Rate and Amount), Language - Thought Disorder, Content, Disruptive/Aggressive Behaviour, Appearance and Insight.
Ratings are based on patient self-reporting, combined with clinician observation (accorded greater score).
Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) change from week 0
The YMRS is an 11-item clinician-administered cross-sectional rating instrument used to assess the severity of mania in patients with a diagnosis of bipolar disorder. The 11 items are: Elevated Mood, Increased Motor Activity/Energy, Sexual Interest, Sleep, Irritability, Speech (Rate and Amount), Language - Thought Disorder, Content, Disruptive/Aggressive Behaviour, Appearance and Insight.
Ratings are based on patient self-reporting, combined with clinician observation (accorded greater score).
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) change from week 0
The C-SSRS is a semi-structured clinical interview that utilizes a set of prompts and questions to help an interviewer assess the full range of suicidal ideation and behavior, and the intensity of ideation, which helps an interviewer get more complete information on suicide risk.
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) change from week 0
The C-SSRS is a semi-structured clinical interview that utilizes a set of prompts and questions to help an interviewer assess the full range of suicidal ideation and behavior, and the intensity of ideation, which helps an interviewer get more complete information on suicide risk.
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) change from week 0
The C-SSRS is a semi-structured clinical interview that utilizes a set of prompts and questions to help an interviewer assess the full range of suicidal ideation and behavior, and the intensity of ideation, which helps an interviewer get more complete information on suicide risk.
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) change from week 0
The C-SSRS is a semi-structured clinical interview that utilizes a set of prompts and questions to help an interviewer assess the full range of suicidal ideation and behavior, and the intensity of ideation, which helps an interviewer get more complete information on suicide risk.
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) change from week 0
The C-SSRS is a semi-structured clinical interview that utilizes a set of prompts and questions to help an interviewer assess the full range of suicidal ideation and behavior, and the intensity of ideation, which helps an interviewer get more complete information on suicide risk.
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) change from week 0
The C-SSRS is a semi-structured clinical interview that utilizes a set of prompts and questions to help an interviewer assess the full range of suicidal ideation and behavior, and the intensity of ideation, which helps an interviewer get more complete information on suicide risk.
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) change from week 0
The C-SSRS is a semi-structured clinical interview that utilizes a set of prompts and questions to help an interviewer assess the full range of suicidal ideation and behavior, and the intensity of ideation, which helps an interviewer get more complete information on suicide risk.
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) change from week 0
The C-SSRS is a semi-structured clinical interview that utilizes a set of prompts and questions to help an interviewer assess the full range of suicidal ideation and behavior, and the intensity of ideation, which helps an interviewer get more complete information on suicide risk.
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) change from week 0
The C-SSRS is a semi-structured clinical interview that utilizes a set of prompts and questions to help an interviewer assess the full range of suicidal ideation and behavior, and the intensity of ideation, which helps an interviewer get more complete information on suicide risk.
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) change from week 0
The C-SSRS is a semi-structured clinical interview that utilizes a set of prompts and questions to help an interviewer assess the full range of suicidal ideation and behavior, and the intensity of ideation, which helps an interviewer get more complete information on suicide risk.
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) change from week 0
The C-SSRS is a semi-structured clinical interview that utilizes a set of prompts and questions to help an interviewer assess the full range of suicidal ideation and behavior, and the intensity of ideation, which helps an interviewer get more complete information on suicide risk.
Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) change from week 0
The C-SSRS is a semi-structured clinical interview that utilizes a set of prompts and questions to help an interviewer assess the full range of suicidal ideation and behavior, and the intensity of ideation, which helps an interviewer get more complete information on suicide risk.
Clinical Global Impression and Improvement Scales (CGI-S and CGI-I) change from week 0
Standardized clinician-administered, cross-sectional assessment of global severity (CGI-S) of PTSD symptomatic status and improvement (CGI-I) from baseline on ordinal 7 point scale.
Clinical Global Impression and Improvement Scales (CGI-S and CGI-I) change from week 0
Standardized clinician-administered, cross-sectional assessment of global severity (CGI-S) of PTSD symptomatic status and improvement (CGI-I) from baseline on ordinal 7 point scale.
Clinical Global Impression and Improvement Scales (CGI-S and CGI-I) change from week 0
Standardized clinician-administered, cross-sectional assessment of global severity (CGI-S) of PTSD symptomatic status and improvement (CGI-I) from baseline on ordinal 7 point scale.
Clinical Global Impression and Improvement Scales (CGI-S and CGI-I) change from week 0
Standardized clinician-administered, cross-sectional assessment of global severity (CGI-S) of PTSD symptomatic status and improvement (CGI-I) from baseline on ordinal 7 point scale.
Clinical Global Impression and Improvement Scales (CGI-S and CGI-I) change from week 0
Standardized clinician-administered, cross-sectional assessment of global severity (CGI-S) of PTSD symptomatic status and improvement (CGI-I) from baseline on ordinal 7 point scale.
Clinical Global Impression and Improvement Scales (CGI-S and CGI-I) change from week 0
Standardized clinician-administered, cross-sectional assessment of global severity (CGI-S) of PTSD symptomatic status and improvement (CGI-I) from baseline on ordinal 7 point scale.
Clinical Global Impression and Improvement Scales (CGI-S and CGI-I) change from week 0
Standardized clinician-administered, cross-sectional assessment of global severity (CGI-S) of PTSD symptomatic status and improvement (CGI-I) from baseline on ordinal 7 point scale.
Clinical Global Impression and Improvement Scales (CGI-S and CGI-I) change from week 0
Standardized clinician-administered, cross-sectional assessment of global severity (CGI-S) of PTSD symptomatic status and improvement (CGI-I) from baseline on ordinal 7 point scale.
Clinical Global Impression and Improvement Scales (CGI-S and CGI-I) change from week 0
Standardized clinician-administered, cross-sectional assessment of global severity (CGI-S) of PTSD symptomatic status and improvement (CGI-I) from baseline on ordinal 7 point scale.
Clinical Global Impression and Improvement Scales (CGI-S and CGI-I) change from week 0
Standardized clinician-administered, cross-sectional assessment of global severity (CGI-S) of PTSD symptomatic status and improvement (CGI-I) from baseline on ordinal 7 point scale.
Clinical Global Impression and Improvement Scales (CGI-S and CGI-I) change from week 0
Standardized clinician-administered, cross-sectional assessment of global severity (CGI-S) of PTSD symptomatic status and improvement (CGI-I) from baseline on ordinal 7 point scale.
Clinical Global Impression and Improvement Scales (CGI-S and CGI-I) change from week 0
Standardized clinician-administered, cross-sectional assessment of global severity (CGI-S) of PTSD symptomatic status and improvement (CGI-I) from baseline on ordinal 7 point scale.
Clinical Global Impression and Improvement Scales (CGI-S and CGI-I) change from week 0
Standardized clinician-administered, cross-sectional assessment of global severity (CGI-S) of PTSD symptomatic status and improvement (CGI-I) from baseline on ordinal 7 point scale.
Clinical Global Impression and Improvement Scales (CGI-S and CGI-I) change from week 0
Standardized clinician-administered, cross-sectional assessment of global severity (CGI-S) of PTSD symptomatic status and improvement (CGI-I) from baseline on ordinal 7 point scale.
Clinical Global Impression and Improvement Scales (CGI-S and CGI-I) change from week 0
Standardized clinician-administered, cross-sectional assessment of global severity (CGI-S) of PTSD symptomatic status and improvement (CGI-I) from baseline on ordinal 7 point scale.
Clinical Global Impression and Improvement Scales (CGI-S and CGI-I) change from week 0
Standardized clinician-administered, cross-sectional assessment of global severity (CGI-S) of PTSD symptomatic status and improvement (CGI-I) from baseline on ordinal 7 point scale.
Clinical Global Impression and Improvement Scales (CGI-S and CGI-I) change from week 0
Standardized clinician-administered, cross-sectional assessment of global severity (CGI-S) of PTSD symptomatic status and improvement (CGI-I) from baseline on ordinal 7 point scale.
Veterans Quality of Life Assessment Scale (SF-36v) change from week 0
Standardized, patient-rated cross-sectional scale measuring subjective physical and emotional health across 8 domains: general health (GH), physical function (PF), role limitations due to physical health (RP), bodily pain (BP), mental health (MH), role limitations due to emotional problems (RE), energy/vitality (VT), and social functioning (SF). The RP and RE scales have been modified in the veterans version from yes/no responses to five point ordinal choices. Otherwise the scale is comparable to the Medical Outcomes SF-36 functional assessment scale.
Veterans Quality of Life Assessment Scale (SF-36v) change from week 0
Standardized, patient-rated cross-sectional scale measuring subjective physical and emotional health across 8 domains: general health (GH), physical function (PF), role limitations due to physical health (RP), bodily pain (BP), mental health (MH), role limitations due to emotional problems (RE), energy/vitality (VT), and social functioning (SF). The RP and RE scales have been modified in the veterans version from yes/no responses to five point ordinal choices. Otherwise the scale is comparable to the Medical Outcomes SF-36 functional assessment scale.
Veterans Quality of Life Assessment Scale (SF-36v) change from week 0
Standardized, patient-rated cross-sectional scale measuring subjective physical and emotional health across 8 domains: general health (GH), physical function (PF), role limitations due to physical health (RP), bodily pain (BP), mental health (MH), role limitations due to emotional problems (RE), energy/vitality (VT), and social functioning (SF). The RP and RE scales have been modified in the veterans version from yes/no responses to five point ordinal choices. Otherwise the scale is comparable to the Medical Outcomes SF-36 functional assessment scale.
Veterans Quality of Life Assessment Scale (SF-36v) change from week 0
Standardized, patient-rated cross-sectional scale measuring subjective physical and emotional health across 8 domains: general health (GH), physical function (PF), role limitations due to physical health (RP), bodily pain (BP), mental health (MH), role limitations due to emotional problems (RE), energy/vitality (VT), and social functioning (SF). The RP and RE scales have been modified in the veterans version from yes/no responses to five point ordinal choices. Otherwise the scale is comparable to the Medical Outcomes SF-36 functional assessment scale.
Veterans Quality of Life Assessment Scale (SF-36v) change from week 0
Standardized, patient-rated cross-sectional scale measuring subjective physical and emotional health across 8 domains: general health (GH), physical function (PF), role limitations due to physical health (RP), bodily pain (BP), mental health (MH), role limitations due to emotional problems (RE), energy/vitality (VT), and social functioning (SF). The RP and RE scales have been modified in the veterans version from yes/no responses to five point ordinal choices. Otherwise the scale is comparable to the Medical Outcomes SF-36 functional assessment scale.
Veterans Quality of Life Assessment Scale (SF-36v) change from week 0
Standardized, patient-rated cross-sectional scale measuring subjective physical and emotional health across 8 domains: general health (GH), physical function (PF), role limitations due to physical health (RP), bodily pain (BP), mental health (MH), role limitations due to emotional problems (RE), energy/vitality (VT), and social functioning (SF). The RP and RE scales have been modified in the veterans version from yes/no responses to five point ordinal choices. Otherwise the scale is comparable to the Medical Outcomes SF-36 functional assessment scale.
Veterans Quality of Life Assessment Scale (SF-36v) change from week 0
Standardized, patient-rated cross-sectional scale measuring subjective physical and emotional health across 8 domains: general health (GH), physical function (PF), role limitations due to physical health (RP), bodily pain (BP), mental health (MH), role limitations due to emotional problems (RE), energy/vitality (VT), and social functioning (SF). The RP and RE scales have been modified in the veterans version from yes/no responses to five point ordinal choices. Otherwise the scale is comparable to the Medical Outcomes SF-36 functional assessment scale.
Veterans Quality of Life Assessment Scale (SF-36v) change from week 0
Standardized, patient-rated cross-sectional scale measuring subjective physical and emotional health across 8 domains: general health (GH), physical function (PF), role limitations due to physical health (RP), bodily pain (BP), mental health (MH), role limitations due to emotional problems (RE), energy/vitality (VT), and social functioning (SF). The RP and RE scales have been modified in the veterans version from yes/no responses to five point ordinal choices. Otherwise the scale is comparable to the Medical Outcomes SF-36 functional assessment scale.
Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS) change from week 0
The DTS is a 17 item self rated scale with each item corresponding to the 17 DSM-IV-TR symptoms of PTSD. Those 17 items comprise 3 clusters: Intrusive, Avoidance/Numbing, and Hyperarousal. The severity and frequency of each symptom is rated along with the distress associated with those symptoms.
Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS) change from week 0
The DTS is a 17 item self rated scale with each item corresponding to the 17 DSM-IV-TR symptoms of PTSD. Those 17 items comprise 3 clusters: Intrusive, Avoidance/Numbing, and Hyperarousal. The severity and frequency of each symptom is rated along with the distress associated with those symptoms.
Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS) change from week 0
The DTS is a 17 item self rated scale with each item corresponding to the 17 DSM-IV-TR symptoms of PTSD. Those 17 items comprise 3 clusters: Intrusive, Avoidance/Numbing, and Hyperarousal. The severity and frequency of each symptom is rated along with the distress associated with those symptoms.
Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS) change from week 0
The DTS is a 17 item self rated scale with each item corresponding to the 17 DSM-IV-TR symptoms of PTSD. Those 17 items comprise 3 clusters: Intrusive, Avoidance/Numbing, and Hyperarousal. The severity and frequency of each symptom is rated along with the distress associated with those symptoms.
Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS) change from week 0
The DTS is a 17 item self rated scale with each item corresponding to the 17 DSM-IV-TR symptoms of PTSD. Those 17 items comprise 3 clusters: Intrusive, Avoidance/Numbing, and Hyperarousal. The severity and frequency of each symptom is rated along with the distress associated with those symptoms.
Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS) change from week 0
The DTS is a 17 item self rated scale with each item corresponding to the 17 DSM-IV-TR symptoms of PTSD. Those 17 items comprise 3 clusters: Intrusive, Avoidance/Numbing, and Hyperarousal. The severity and frequency of each symptom is rated along with the distress associated with those symptoms.
Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS) change from week 0
The DTS is a 17 item self rated scale with each item corresponding to the 17 DSM-IV-TR symptoms of PTSD. Those 17 items comprise 3 clusters: Intrusive, Avoidance/Numbing, and Hyperarousal. The severity and frequency of each symptom is rated along with the distress associated with those symptoms.
Davidson Trauma Scale (DTS) change from week 0
The DTS is a 17 item self rated scale with each item corresponding to the 17 DSM-IV-TR symptoms of PTSD. Those 17 items comprise 3 clusters: Intrusive, Avoidance/Numbing, and Hyperarousal. The severity and frequency of each symptom is rated along with the distress associated with those symptoms.
Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF) change from week 0
Clinician-rated, overall assessment of functional capacity related to psychiatric diagnosis that forms Axis V of DSM-IV TR multiaxial diagnostic assessment. It is designed to rate overall psychological, social and occupational functioning, but does not include any physical or environmental impairments. The patient is rated at the end of a diagnostic interview on a single score scale of 1-100, with the scale being divided into ten ranges of functioning.
Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF) change from week 0
Clinician-rated, overall assessment of functional capacity related to psychiatric diagnosis that forms Axis V of DSM-IV TR multiaxial diagnostic assessment. It is designed to rate overall psychological, social and occupational functioning, but does not include any physical or environmental impairments. The patient is rated at the end of a diagnostic interview on a single score scale of 1-100, with the scale being divided into ten ranges of functioning.
Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF) change from week 0
Clinician-rated, overall assessment of functional capacity related to psychiatric diagnosis that forms Axis V of DSM-IV TR multiaxial diagnostic assessment. It is designed to rate overall psychological, social and occupational functioning, but does not include any physical or environmental impairments. The patient is rated at the end of a diagnostic interview on a single score scale of 1-100, with the scale being divided into ten ranges of functioning.
Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF) change from week 0
Clinician-rated, overall assessment of functional capacity related to psychiatric diagnosis that forms Axis V of DSM-IV TR multiaxial diagnostic assessment. It is designed to rate overall psychological, social and occupational functioning, but does not include any physical or environmental impairments. The patient is rated at the end of a diagnostic interview on a single score scale of 1-100, with the scale being divided into ten ranges of functioning.
Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF) change from week 0
Clinician-rated, overall assessment of functional capacity related to psychiatric diagnosis that forms Axis V of DSM-IV TR multiaxial diagnostic assessment. It is designed to rate overall psychological, social and occupational functioning, but does not include any physical or environmental impairments. The patient is rated at the end of a diagnostic interview on a single score scale of 1-100, with the scale being divided into ten ranges of functioning.
Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF) change from week 0
Clinician-rated, overall assessment of functional capacity related to psychiatric diagnosis that forms Axis V of DSM-IV TR multiaxial diagnostic assessment. It is designed to rate overall psychological, social and occupational functioning, but does not include any physical or environmental impairments. The patient is rated at the end of a diagnostic interview on a single score scale of 1-100, with the scale being divided into ten ranges of functioning.
Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF) change from week 0
Clinician-rated, overall assessment of functional capacity related to psychiatric diagnosis that forms Axis V of DSM-IV TR multiaxial diagnostic assessment. It is designed to rate overall psychological, social and occupational functioning, but does not include any physical or environmental impairments. The patient is rated at the end of a diagnostic interview on a single score scale of 1-100, with the scale being divided into ten ranges of functioning.
Global Assessment of Functioning Scale (GAF) change from week 0
Clinician-rated, overall assessment of functional capacity related to psychiatric diagnosis that forms Axis V of DSM-IV TR multiaxial diagnostic assessment. It is designed to rate overall psychological, social and occupational functioning, but does not include any physical or environmental impairments. The patient is rated at the end of a diagnostic interview on a single score scale of 1-100, with the scale being divided into ten ranges of functioning.
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale III (WAIS-III)-Digit Span Subtest change from baseline
Standardized, two-part test of working memory consisting of digits forward, which measures subjects ability to repeat sequences of 3 to 9 digits; and digits backward in which subjects are asked to repeat two to eight numbers in reverse order.
Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale III (WAIS-III)-Digit Span Subtest change from baseline
Standardized, two-part test of working memory consisting of digits forward, which measures subjects ability to repeat sequences of 3 to 9 digits; and digits backward in which subjects are asked to repeat two to eight numbers in reverse order.
Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) change from baseline
This test is a brief and sensitive measure of verbal association fluency and executive cognitive dysfunction. It measures the spontaneous production of words beginning with a given letter (phonetic association) or given class of words (semantic association) and the subjects are asked to produce as many words as possible within the time limits. F, A and S are the most commonly used letters and a common category is animals. Administration takes approximately 5-10 minutes.
Controlled Oral Word Association Test (COWAT) change from baseline
This test is a brief and sensitive measure of verbal association fluency and executive cognitive dysfunction. It measures the spontaneous production of words beginning with a given letter (phonetic association) or given class of words (semantic association) and the subjects are asked to produce as many words as possible within the time limits. F, A and S are the most commonly used letters and a common category is animals. Administration takes approximately 5-10 minutes.
The Clinician-Administered PTSD scale (CAPS) change from week 0
This is a standardized structured, clinician administered interview that includes both questions confirming the diagnosis of PTSD (CAPSDx) as well as symptom severity over specified time periods (lifetime, past week or past month) based on the 17 symptoms of PTSD in DSM-III/II-R and IV across clusters of recurrence, avoidance/numbing and hyper-arousal symptoms (CAPS1-17 or CAPSSx).
Clinical Global Impression and Improvement Scales (CGI-S and CGI-I) change from week 0
Standardized clinician-administered, cross-sectional assessment of global severity (CGI-S) of PTSD symptomatic status and improvement (CGI-I) from baseline on ordinal 7 point scale.
Ruff Figural Fluency Test (RFFT) change from baseline
This test measures the production of novel designs under time constraints and is intended to assess the capacity for fluid and divergent thinking, flexibility in shifting thinking, planning strategies and the ability to coordinate a process. Five dot stimuli are presented in 35 contiguous squares and subjects are asked to draw as many unique designs as possible by connecting the dots within each rectangle.
Ruff Figural Fluency Test (RFFT) change from baseline
This test measures the production of novel designs under time constraints and is intended to assess the capacity for fluid and divergent thinking, flexibility in shifting thinking, planning strategies and the ability to coordinate a process. Five dot stimuli are presented in 35 contiguous squares and subjects are asked to draw as many unique designs as possible by connecting the dots within each rectangle.
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised (HVLT-R) change from baseline
This test assesses immediate and delayed recall along with delayed recognition. The subject is provided 3 learning trials to remember an orally presented 12-word list (four nouns from each of 3 semantic categories). Following a 20-25 minute interval, delayed recall and yes/no recognition are assessed. The yes/no recognition is where subjects are also asked to identify the words from a word list (12 target words and 12 non-target words) that is presented verbally. The test takes about 15 minutes excluding the delay interval which is preferably filled with intervening visuospatial tasks. Administration time is approximately 5-10 minutes excluding the 25 minute delay.
Hopkins Verbal Learning Test - Revised (HVLT-R) change from baseline
This test assesses immediate and delayed recall along with delayed recognition. The subject is provided 3 learning trials to remember an orally presented 12-word list (four nouns from each of 3 semantic categories). Following a 20-25 minute interval, delayed recall and yes/no recognition are assessed. The yes/no recognition is where subjects are also asked to identify the words from a word list (12 target words and 12 non-target words) that is presented verbally. The test takes about 15 minutes excluding the delay interval which is preferably filled with intervening visuospatial tasks. Administration time is approximately 5-10 minutes excluding the 25 minute delay.
Brief Visual Memory Test - Revised (BVMT-R) change from baseline
This test is used to assess visual memory and consists of six alternate forms that give measures of recognition, rate of acquisition, immediate recall, and delayed recall. For 10 seconds, a subject is given a stimulus form consisting of six geometric figures in a 2 x 3 matrix. The tasks consist of immediately drawing as many of the figures as possible in their correct location and this task is repeated 25 minutes later. This is followed by a recognition trial in which the subject is asked to identify which six of the 12 presented figures were on the original form. About 15 minutes are required for the test, excluding the delay interval.
Brief Visual Memory Test - Revised (BVMT-R) change from baseline
This test is used to assess visual memory and consists of six alternate forms that give measures of recognition, rate of acquisition, immediate recall, and delayed recall. For 10 seconds, a subject is given a stimulus form consisting of six geometric figures in a 2 x 3 matrix. The tasks consist of immediately drawing as many of the figures as possible in their correct location and this task is repeated 25 minutes later. This is followed by a recognition trial in which the subject is asked to identify which six of the 12 presented figures were on the original form. About 15 minutes are required for the test, excluding the delay interval.
Boston Naming Test (BNT) change from baseline
The BNT assesses the ability to name pictured objects with 60 line drawings that are presented one at a time. Words range from common (tree) to low frequency/rare (abacus). Scores include number correct and the need for various types of cueing as two prompting cues are allowed (phonemic cue, stimulus cue). Scores can be compared with age-based norms. This test requires approximately 10-20 minutes.
Boston Naming Test (BNT) change from baseline
The BNT assesses the ability to name pictured objects with 60 line drawings that are presented one at a time. Words range from common (tree) to low frequency/rare (abacus). Scores include number correct and the need for various types of cueing as two prompting cues are allowed (phonemic cue, stimulus cue). Scores can be compared with age-based norms. This test requires approximately 10-20 minutes.
Hooper Visual Organization Test (VOT) change from baseline
This tests the ability of the subject to conceptually organize visual stimuli (pictures) that have been disarranged and allows the assessor to detect neurological impairment. The test consists of 30 line drawings of common objects that have been cut into pieces. These pieces are scattered and the task is to identify what the object would be if the pieces were put back correctly. Total test time is approximately 10-15 minutes.
Hooper Visual Organization Test (VOT) change from baseline
This tests the ability of the subject to conceptually organize visual stimuli (pictures) that have been disarranged and allows the assessor to detect neurological impairment. The test consists of 30 line drawings of common objects that have been cut into pieces. These pieces are scattered and the task is to identify what the object would be if the pieces were put back correctly. Total test time is approximately 10-15 minutes.
Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure (CFT) change from baseline
The purpose of this test is to assess visuospatial perception, attention, planning, and visual and working memory, by the construction of a complex figure and then remembering it for later recall (3 minutes and a 30 minute delayed recall). Total test time is approximately 10-15 minutes, excluding the delay.
Rey-Osterrieth Complex Figure (CFT) change from baseline
The purpose of this test is to assess visuospatial perception, attention, planning, and visual and working memory, by the construction of a complex figure and then remembering it for later recall (3 minutes and a 30 minute delayed recall). Total test time is approximately 10-15 minutes, excluding the delay.
Clock Drawing Test change from baseline
This is a screening test for visuospatial and cognitive dysfunction. The subject is given an unlined sheet of paper and asked to construct a clock containing all the numbers and with the hands set to a specified time. Abnormal drawings can be a result of psychiatric conditions as well as other medical conditions. This test can be completed in about 5 minutes. Several standardized, quantitative scoring systems exist.
Clock Drawing Test change from baseline
This is a screening test for visuospatial and cognitive dysfunction. The subject is given an unlined sheet of paper and asked to construct a clock containing all the numbers and with the hands set to a specified time. Abnormal drawings can be a result of psychiatric conditions as well as other medical conditions. This test can be completed in about 5 minutes. Several standardized, quantitative scoring systems exist.
Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) change from baseline
This test measures the ability to form concepts, utilize feedback and "set-shift", which is the ability to display flexibility in the face of changing conditions. Four stimulus cards are placed in front of the subject who then is given two packs of response cards with 64 cards in each set. No instructions are given as to how to match the response cards to the stimulus - by color, design or quantity of symbols. Feedback is given each time a correct or incorrect selection is made. During the test the matching rules are altered and the subject must adjust by learning the new rules. The approximate time to complete this test is 15-30 minutes. Assesses dorsolateral prefrontal-subcortical circuit function
Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST) change from baseline
This test measures the ability to form concepts, utilize feedback and "set-shift", which is the ability to display flexibility in the face of changing conditions. Four stimulus cards are placed in front of the subject who then is given two packs of response cards with 64 cards in each set. No instructions are given as to how to match the response cards to the stimulus - by color, design or quantity of symbols. Feedback is given each time a correct or incorrect selection is made. During the test the matching rules are altered and the subject must adjust by learning the new rules. The approximate time to complete this test is 15-30 minutes. Assesses dorsolateral prefrontal-subcortical circuit function
Stroop Color and Word Test (STROOP) change from baseline
This test is a measure of reaction time, selective attention, cognitive flexibility in terms of shifting perception to changing demands, and the ability to suppress a habitual response in favor of an unusual one. It is based upon the fact that we can read words faster than we can name colors. There are 3 parts to the test. In Part 1 (Color Reading), the subject has to read the word of the colors, (red, green, blue) which are printed either in black ink or in the color that corresponds to the printed word. In the Part 2 (Color Naming), the print color of the words does not correspond to the color name and the subject must name the printed word. In Part 3, the subject must name the color in which the color names are printed and disregard reading the word. An increased interference effect can occur in a variety of disorders which include mental disease. The entire test can be completed in about 5 minutes. Assesses dorsolateral prefrontal-subcortical circuit function
Stroop Color and Word Test (STROOP) change from baseline
This test is a measure of reaction time, selective attention, cognitive flexibility in terms of shifting perception to changing demands, and the ability to suppress a habitual response in favor of an unusual one. It is based upon the fact that we can read words faster than we can name colors. There are 3 parts to the test. In Part 1 (Color Reading), the subject has to read the word of the colors, (red, green, blue) which are printed either in black ink or in the color that corresponds to the printed word. In the Part 2 (Color Naming), the print color of the words does not correspond to the color name and the subject must name the printed word. In Part 3, the subject must name the color in which the color names are printed and disregard reading the word. An increased interference effect can occur in a variety of disorders which include mental disease. The entire test can be completed in about 5 minutes. Assesses dorsolateral prefrontal-subcortical circuit function
Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) change from baseline
This test simulates a real-life decision-making situation and assesses the subjects decision making under ambiguity as well as classifying the subjects decision-making behavior in terms of risk taking and risk aversion. Subjects are given 4 card decks with the goal of maximizing winnings. They are told that sometimes they will win and sometimes they will lose but they are not informed that 2 of the decks are "risky" because they are associated with large wins, but also large losses. It has been found that subjects with orbitofrontal cortex dysfunction continue to persevere with the risky decks.
Iowa Gambling Task (IGT) change from baseline
This test simulates a real-life decision-making situation and assesses the subjects decision making under ambiguity as well as classifying the subjects decision-making behavior in terms of risk taking and risk aversion. Subjects are given 4 card decks with the goal of maximizing winnings. They are told that sometimes they will win and sometimes they will lose but they are not informed that 2 of the decks are "risky" because they are associated with large wins, but also large losses. It has been found that subjects with orbitofrontal cortex dysfunction continue to persevere with the risky decks.
Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) change from baseline
The purpose of this test is to provide a rapid "bedside" grade of severity of cognitive impairment. Over the course of approximately 10 minutes, it samples orientation, memory, concentration, language and visuospatial function via simple questions and problems. The maximum score is 30 and any score > 25 is considered to be normal functioning.
Mini Mental State Exam (MMSE) change from baseline
The purpose of this test is to provide a rapid "bedside" grade of severity of cognitive impairment. Over the course of approximately 10 minutes, it samples orientation, memory, concentration, language and visuospatial function via simple questions and problems. The maximum score is 30 and any score > 25 is considered to be normal functioning.
Change in PET CT 18-fluorodeoxyglucose metabolism from baseline
Pre-operatively, patients will undergo a provocative PET CT scan using fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) assessing activity of the amygdalae, insulae and medial PFC regions. The provocation will consist of re-exposure of the patient to the initial trauma that caused PTSD using script-driven imagery as in prolonged exposure therapy. Baseline and 15 month scans will be compared both for resting and post-provocation metabolism. The hypothesis is that DBS reduces amygdala hyperactivity in PTSD patients. The PET CT scan data will be processed with a statistical parametric mapping method using SPM99 (Wellcome Department of Neurology, London, England). PET data in each voxel will be normalized and fitted in a linear statistical model. Hypotheses will be evaluated as contrasts where the linear compounds of the model parameters will be evaluated with t-tests transformed into a z-score. We will consider z>3.09 (P<0.001 one tail, uncorrected) as statistically significant.