search
Back to results

A Trial Looking at Ofatumumab for People With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia Who Cannot Have More Intensive Treatment (RIAltO)

Primary Purpose

Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Ofatumumab
Chlorambucil
Bendamustine
Sponsored by
University of Liverpool
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia focused on measuring Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia, Less fit, CD20 antibody, Ofatumumab, Chlorambucil, Bendamustine

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. CLL/SLL requiring treatment by NCI/IWCLL 2008 criteria. At least one of the following criteria:

    1. Progressive marrow failure as manifested by the development of, or worsening of, anaemia and/or thrombocytopenia.
    2. Massive (i.e. 6 cm below the left costal margin) or progressive or symptomatic splenomegaly.
    3. Massive (i.e. 10 cm in longest diameter) or progressive or symptomatic lymphadenopathy.
    4. Progressive lymphocytosis with an increase of more than 50% over a 2-month period or lymphocyte doubling time (LDT) of less than 6 months.
  2. No prior cytotoxic or targeted therapy for CLL
  3. Full-dose R-FC considered inappropriate for at least one of the following reasons

    1. Age 75 or greater
    2. WHO performance status 2 or 3
    3. Cardiac impairment (NYHA class II)
    4. Respiratory impairment (bronchiectasis or moderate COPD)
    5. Renal impairment (estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) 10-30 ml/min)
    6. Any other significant co-morbidity or factor that makes R-FC inappropriate
  4. Considered able to tolerate Chl at the dose used in the LRF CLL4 trial (10mg/m2 d1-7)
  5. Written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Neutrophil count less than 1.0 x 109/l or platelet count less than 50 x 109/l unless due to CLL
  2. Uncontrolled auto-immune haemolytic anaemia or thrombocytopenia
  3. Active infection
  4. Seropositivity for HIV, HCV or HBV (surface antigen or and core antibody)
  5. Severe renal impairment (eGFR less than 10ml/min)
  6. Severe hepatic impairment (serum bilirubin more than twice the upper limit of normal) unless due to CLL or Gilbert's syndrome.
  7. Concurrent treatment with glucocorticoids equivalent to more than prednisolone 20mg od
  8. Prior treatment with monoclonal antibody therapy within the last 3 months.
  9. Yellow fever vaccination within 4 weeks prior to treatment start
  10. Known hypersensitivity to ofatumumab, bendamustine or chlorambucil or any of their excipients
  11. CNS involvement with CLL
  12. History of Richter transformation
  13. Concomitant malignancies within the last 3 years except successfully treated non-melanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ.
  14. Major surgery within 28 days prior to randomisation
  15. WHO performance status 4
  16. Severe cardiac disease including unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction within six months prior to randomization, congestive heart failure (NYHA III-IV), and arrhythmia (excluding extra systoles or minor conduction abnormalities) unless controlled by therapy.
  17. Any serious underlying medical or psychological conditions, which could impair the ability of the patient to participate in the trial or compromise ability to give informed consent
  18. Treatment within a clinical trial within 30 days prior to trial entry.
  19. Adult patient under tutelage (not competent to sign informed consent).
  20. Pregnant or lactating women.
  21. Women of childbearing potential, including women whose last menstrual period was less than one year prior to screening, unable or unwilling to use adequate contraception from study start to one year after the last dose of protocol therapy. Adequate contraception is defined as hormonal birth control, intrauterine device, double barrier method or total abstinence.
  22. Male subjects unable or unwilling to use adequate contraception methods from study start to one year after the last dose of protocol therapy.

Sites / Locations

  • Countess of Chester HospitalRecruiting
  • Derriford HospitalRecruiting
  • Torbay HospitalRecruiting
  • Royal Bournemouth HospitalRecruiting
  • Dorset County HospitalRecruiting
  • Colchester General HospitalRecruiting
  • Basingstoke and North Hampshire HospitalRecruiting
  • Southampton General HospitalRecruiting
  • Barnet and Chase Farm HospitalsRecruiting
  • Kent and Canterbury HospitalRecruiting
  • Maidstone HospitalRecruiting
  • Princess Royal HospitalRecruiting
  • Queen Elizabeth HospitalRecruiting
  • West Middlesex University HospitalRecruiting
  • Ealing HospitalRecruiting
  • Hillingdon HospitalRecruiting
  • Belfast City HospitalRecruiting
  • Royal United HospitalRecruiting
  • Weston General HospitalRecruiting
  • Queens HospitalRecruiting
  • Queen Elizabeth HospitalRecruiting
  • Queen Elizabeth HospitalRecruiting
  • Bradford Royal InfirmaryRecruiting
  • Airdale General HospitalRecruiting
  • St James University HospitalRecruiting
  • Salisbury District HospitalRecruiting
  • Arrowe Park HospitalRecruiting
  • Royal Liverpool HospitalRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Ofatumumab-Chlorambucil

Ofatumumab-Bendamustine

Arm Description

Ofatumumab cycle 1: 300mg iv day 1, 1000mg iv day 8; cycle 2 onwards: 1000mg iv day 1 Chlorambucil: 10mg/m2 po days 1-7

Ofatumumab cycle 1: 300mg iv day 1, 1000mg iv day 8; cycle 2 onwards: 1000mg iv day 1 Bendamustine: 70mg/m2 iv days 1 and 2

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Progression-free survival
Calculated from the date of randomisation to the date of progression or death, or the censor date.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Duration of response
Response duration is defined as the time from when the criteria for partial or complete response are met until the first documentation of relapse or progression.
Overall survival
Overall survival is defined as the time from initiation of study treatment to death, irrespective of cause or subsequent treatment. Patients still alive at the time of analysis will be censored at the date last seen alive at last follow up.
Time to treatment failure
Time to treatment failure is defined as the time from initiation of study treatment to death, disease progression, or initiation of alternative treatment due to failure to achieve a complete or partial response to the study treatment.
Toxicity
Haematological toxicity will be reported in accordance with the 2008 NCI/IWCLL guidelines. Non-haematological toxicity will be reported in accordance with the current Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0.
Treatment dose administered
The number of cycles of treatment and cumulative dose of individual drugs administered will be summarised for each treatment group separately and compared across treatment groups
Quality of life
Quality of life will be assessed using the EQ-5D; EQ-VAS; EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-CLL16 questionnaires. To standardise the raw scores, they will be linearly transformed into 0-to-100 scores.
Health Economic analysis
The economic evaluation will take the form of a cost-effectiveness analysis with the differential cost of the alternative treatments will be related to their differential benefits in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Incremental cost-utility ratios will be estimated based on QALY estimates. A range of uni- and multi-variate, as well as probabilistic sensitivity analyses will be conducted to assess the robustness of the analysis. The use of bootstrapping and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves will facilitate a measure of variability around cost-effectiveness estimates. Sensitivity analysis will be used to consider the importance of sources of uncertainty other than sample variation (e.g. unit costs, discount rates). A model-based extrapolation of the trial results will be performed to explore the impact of a longer analytic time horizon, and consideration of health outcomes on the treatment cost-effectiveness.
Analysis of frailty and co-morbidity
Patients outcomes will be compared across patient subgroups defined by CIRS, performance status, Vulnerable Elders Survey-13, Groningen Frailty Index (GFI) questionnaires and the Timed 'Up and Go' test.
Predictive value of biomarkers
Patient outcomes will be compared across patient subgroups defined by clinical (e.g. age, sex, stage) and laboratory (e.g. chromosomal, abnormalities, IGHV mutation status, TP53 mutation status).
Response
Response following initial therapy will be assessed in accordance with the revised (2008) NCI/IWCLL response criteria applicable to CLL. Minimal residual disease will be assessed by multicolour flow cytometric analysis of bone marrow aspirate samples taken 2 months after completing treatment and of blood samples taken 2 and 6 months after completing treatment.

Full Information

First Posted
August 30, 2012
Last Updated
October 12, 2012
Sponsor
University of Liverpool
Collaborators
GlaxoSmithKline, Napp Pharmaceuticals Limited, Chugai Pharma USA
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01678430
Brief Title
A Trial Looking at Ofatumumab for People With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia Who Cannot Have More Intensive Treatment
Acronym
RIAltO
Official Title
A Randomised Investigation of Alternative Ofatumumab-containing Regimens in Less Fit Patients With CLL
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2012
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
December 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
December 2017 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2017 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Name of the Sponsor
University of Liverpool
Collaborators
GlaxoSmithKline, Napp Pharmaceuticals Limited, Chugai Pharma USA

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare ofatumumab & chlorambucil (O-Chl) versus ofatumumab & bendamustine (O-B) in patients with Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia who are considered not fit enough for rituximab, fludarabine & cyclophosphamide (R-FC).
Detailed Description
Chlorambucil (Chl) has been the mainstay of CLL treatment for half a century. However, frontline treatment has improved considerably over the last decade, first by the advent of fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide (FC), and more recently by the addition of the anti-CD20 antibody, rituximab, to FC. Although FC-based regimens are considerably more effective than Chl, they are also associated with greater toxicity which makes them inappropriate for less fit patients. This is an important consideration, given that CLL predominantly affects older people who tend to have more co-morbidity. Although a single-arm phase II study (Roche MO20927; NCRI CLL208) has shown that R-Chl is safe and effective, there are no phase III data proving the benefit of adding an anti-CD20 antibody to Chl. This question is currently being addressed by a phase III RCT of Chl with or without ofatumumab (GSK OMB110911 / COMPLEMENT-1 / NCRI CLL7). Ofatumumab is a fully human anti-CD20 antibody that binds to an epitope distinct from that of rituximab and produces more complement-dependent cytotoxicity. The RIAltO trial is a direct follow-on to the NCRI CLL7 phase III RCT trial in less fit patients and therefore the Ofatumumab dose has been selected to mirror the regimen used in that trial.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia
Keywords
Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia, Less fit, CD20 antibody, Ofatumumab, Chlorambucil, Bendamustine

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
670 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Ofatumumab-Chlorambucil
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Ofatumumab cycle 1: 300mg iv day 1, 1000mg iv day 8; cycle 2 onwards: 1000mg iv day 1 Chlorambucil: 10mg/m2 po days 1-7
Arm Title
Ofatumumab-Bendamustine
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Ofatumumab cycle 1: 300mg iv day 1, 1000mg iv day 8; cycle 2 onwards: 1000mg iv day 1 Bendamustine: 70mg/m2 iv days 1 and 2
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ofatumumab
Other Intervention Name(s)
Arzerra
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Chlorambucil
Other Intervention Name(s)
Leukeran
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Bendamustine
Other Intervention Name(s)
Levact
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Progression-free survival
Description
Calculated from the date of randomisation to the date of progression or death, or the censor date.
Time Frame
There are three pre-planned analyses of the PFS primary endpoint: end recruitment (approx 150 events); 300 events (after a minimum 12 months follow up for all patients), 400 events (after a minimum 24 months follow up for all patients)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Duration of response
Description
Response duration is defined as the time from when the criteria for partial or complete response are met until the first documentation of relapse or progression.
Time Frame
6 years (after 2 years follow up of the last patient recruited)
Title
Overall survival
Description
Overall survival is defined as the time from initiation of study treatment to death, irrespective of cause or subsequent treatment. Patients still alive at the time of analysis will be censored at the date last seen alive at last follow up.
Time Frame
6 years (after 2 year follow up of the last patient recruited)
Title
Time to treatment failure
Description
Time to treatment failure is defined as the time from initiation of study treatment to death, disease progression, or initiation of alternative treatment due to failure to achieve a complete or partial response to the study treatment.
Time Frame
6 years (after 2 year follow up of the last patient recruited)
Title
Toxicity
Description
Haematological toxicity will be reported in accordance with the 2008 NCI/IWCLL guidelines. Non-haematological toxicity will be reported in accordance with the current Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) Version 4.0.
Time Frame
6 years (after 2 years follow up of the last patient recruited)
Title
Treatment dose administered
Description
The number of cycles of treatment and cumulative dose of individual drugs administered will be summarised for each treatment group separately and compared across treatment groups
Time Frame
5 years (assuming last patient in receives 12 cycles of treatment)
Title
Quality of life
Description
Quality of life will be assessed using the EQ-5D; EQ-VAS; EORTC QLQ-C30 and EORTC QLQ-CLL16 questionnaires. To standardise the raw scores, they will be linearly transformed into 0-to-100 scores.
Time Frame
6 years (after 2 years follow up of the last patient recruited)
Title
Health Economic analysis
Description
The economic evaluation will take the form of a cost-effectiveness analysis with the differential cost of the alternative treatments will be related to their differential benefits in terms of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Incremental cost-utility ratios will be estimated based on QALY estimates. A range of uni- and multi-variate, as well as probabilistic sensitivity analyses will be conducted to assess the robustness of the analysis. The use of bootstrapping and cost-effectiveness acceptability curves will facilitate a measure of variability around cost-effectiveness estimates. Sensitivity analysis will be used to consider the importance of sources of uncertainty other than sample variation (e.g. unit costs, discount rates). A model-based extrapolation of the trial results will be performed to explore the impact of a longer analytic time horizon, and consideration of health outcomes on the treatment cost-effectiveness.
Time Frame
6 years (after 2 years follow up of the last patient recruited)
Title
Analysis of frailty and co-morbidity
Description
Patients outcomes will be compared across patient subgroups defined by CIRS, performance status, Vulnerable Elders Survey-13, Groningen Frailty Index (GFI) questionnaires and the Timed 'Up and Go' test.
Time Frame
Baseline, 2 months post treatment
Title
Predictive value of biomarkers
Description
Patient outcomes will be compared across patient subgroups defined by clinical (e.g. age, sex, stage) and laboratory (e.g. chromosomal, abnormalities, IGHV mutation status, TP53 mutation status).
Time Frame
Baseline, every 6 months until 42 months from study entry, disease progression
Title
Response
Description
Response following initial therapy will be assessed in accordance with the revised (2008) NCI/IWCLL response criteria applicable to CLL. Minimal residual disease will be assessed by multicolour flow cytometric analysis of bone marrow aspirate samples taken 2 months after completing treatment and of blood samples taken 2 and 6 months after completing treatment.
Time Frame
Baseline; 2 months post treatment; 6 months post treatment

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: CLL/SLL requiring treatment by NCI/IWCLL 2008 criteria. At least one of the following criteria: Progressive marrow failure as manifested by the development of, or worsening of, anaemia and/or thrombocytopenia. Massive (i.e. 6 cm below the left costal margin) or progressive or symptomatic splenomegaly. Massive (i.e. 10 cm in longest diameter) or progressive or symptomatic lymphadenopathy. Progressive lymphocytosis with an increase of more than 50% over a 2-month period or lymphocyte doubling time (LDT) of less than 6 months. No prior cytotoxic or targeted therapy for CLL Full-dose R-FC considered inappropriate for at least one of the following reasons Age 75 or greater WHO performance status 2 or 3 Cardiac impairment (NYHA class II) Respiratory impairment (bronchiectasis or moderate COPD) Renal impairment (estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) 10-30 ml/min) Any other significant co-morbidity or factor that makes R-FC inappropriate Considered able to tolerate Chl at the dose used in the LRF CLL4 trial (10mg/m2 d1-7) Written informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Neutrophil count less than 1.0 x 109/l or platelet count less than 50 x 109/l unless due to CLL Uncontrolled auto-immune haemolytic anaemia or thrombocytopenia Active infection Seropositivity for HIV, HCV or HBV (surface antigen or and core antibody) Severe renal impairment (eGFR less than 10ml/min) Severe hepatic impairment (serum bilirubin more than twice the upper limit of normal) unless due to CLL or Gilbert's syndrome. Concurrent treatment with glucocorticoids equivalent to more than prednisolone 20mg od Prior treatment with monoclonal antibody therapy within the last 3 months. Yellow fever vaccination within 4 weeks prior to treatment start Known hypersensitivity to ofatumumab, bendamustine or chlorambucil or any of their excipients CNS involvement with CLL History of Richter transformation Concomitant malignancies within the last 3 years except successfully treated non-melanoma skin cancer or carcinoma in situ. Major surgery within 28 days prior to randomisation WHO performance status 4 Severe cardiac disease including unstable angina, acute myocardial infarction within six months prior to randomization, congestive heart failure (NYHA III-IV), and arrhythmia (excluding extra systoles or minor conduction abnormalities) unless controlled by therapy. Any serious underlying medical or psychological conditions, which could impair the ability of the patient to participate in the trial or compromise ability to give informed consent Treatment within a clinical trial within 30 days prior to trial entry. Adult patient under tutelage (not competent to sign informed consent). Pregnant or lactating women. Women of childbearing potential, including women whose last menstrual period was less than one year prior to screening, unable or unwilling to use adequate contraception from study start to one year after the last dose of protocol therapy. Adequate contraception is defined as hormonal birth control, intrauterine device, double barrier method or total abstinence. Male subjects unable or unwilling to use adequate contraception methods from study start to one year after the last dose of protocol therapy.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Kathryn Marley
Phone
+44 151 895 5287
Email
kathryn.marley@liv.ac.uk
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Countess of Chester Hospital
City
Chester
State/Province
Cheshire
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Salaheddin Tueger
Facility Name
Derriford Hospital
City
Plymouth
State/Province
Devon
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Simon Rule
Facility Name
Torbay Hospital
City
Torquay
State/Province
Devon
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Deborah Turner
Facility Name
Royal Bournemouth Hospital
City
Bournemouth
State/Province
Dorset
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Helen McCarthy
Facility Name
Dorset County Hospital
City
Dorchester
State/Province
Dorset
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Akeel Moosa
Facility Name
Colchester General Hospital
City
Colchester
State/Province
Essex
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Mike Hamblin
Facility Name
Basingstoke and North Hampshire Hospital
City
Basingstoke
State/Province
Hampshire
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Sylwia Simpson
Facility Name
Southampton General Hospital
City
Southampton
State/Province
Hampshire
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Andrew Duncombe
Facility Name
Barnet and Chase Farm Hospitals
City
Enfield
State/Province
Hertfordshire
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Andres Virchis
Facility Name
Kent and Canterbury Hospital
City
Canterbury
State/Province
Kent
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christopher Pocock
Facility Name
Maidstone Hospital
City
Maidstone
State/Province
Kent
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Saad Rassam
Facility Name
Princess Royal Hospital
City
Orpington
State/Province
Kent
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Corrine De Lord
Facility Name
Queen Elizabeth Hospital
City
Woolwich
State/Province
London
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Corrine De Lord
Facility Name
West Middlesex University Hospital
City
Isleworth
State/Province
Middlesex
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Magda Alobaidi
Facility Name
Ealing Hospital
City
Southall
State/Province
Middlesex
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Richard Kaczmarski
Facility Name
Hillingdon Hospital
City
Uxbridge
State/Province
Middlesex
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Richard Kaczmarski
Facility Name
Belfast City Hospital
City
Belfast
State/Province
Northern Ireland
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Paul Kettle
Facility Name
Royal United Hospital
City
Bath
State/Province
Somerset
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christopher Knechtli
Facility Name
Weston General Hospital
City
Weston-super-Mare
State/Province
Somerset
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Philip Robson
Facility Name
Queens Hospital
City
Burton-upon-Trent
State/Province
Staffordshire
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Humayun Ahmad
Facility Name
Queen Elizabeth Hospital
City
Gateshead
State/Province
Tyne and Wear
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Scott Marshall
Facility Name
Queen Elizabeth Hospital
City
Birmingham
State/Province
West Midlands
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Paul Moss
Facility Name
Bradford Royal Infirmary
City
Bradford
State/Province
West Yorkshire
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Adrian Williams
Facility Name
Airdale General Hospital
City
Keighley
State/Province
West Yorkshire
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Chetan Patalappa
Facility Name
St James University Hospital
City
Leeds
State/Province
West Yorkshire
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Peter Hillmen
Facility Name
Salisbury District Hospital
City
Salisbury
State/Province
Wiltshire
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jonathan Cullis
Facility Name
Arrowe Park Hospital
City
Upton
State/Province
Wirral
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ranjit Dasgupta
Facility Name
Royal Liverpool Hospital
City
Liverpool
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Andrew Pettitt

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Links:
URL
http://www.controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN09988575/bendamustine
Description
ISRCTN
URL
http://cancerhelp.cancerresearchuk.org/trials/trials-search/a-trial-looking-ofatumumab-people-chronic-lymphocytic-leukaemia-who-cannot-have-more-intensive-treatment-rialto
Description
CancerHelp UK

Learn more about this trial

A Trial Looking at Ofatumumab for People With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia Who Cannot Have More Intensive Treatment

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs