search
Back to results

Safety and Performance of TAVI of Venus MedTech Aortic Valve Prosthesis (Venus-A)

Primary Purpose

Aortic Valve Stenosis, Aortic Valve Calcification

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
China
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Venus MedTech Aortic Valve Prosthesis
Sponsored by
Venus MedTech (HangZhou) Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Aortic Valve Stenosis focused on measuring aortic valve stenosis, Calcification, TAVI, aortic valve Prosthesis

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Senile degenerative aortic valve stenosis with echocardiography derived criteria: mean gradient ≥ 40 mm Hg, or jet velocity ≥ 4.0 m/s, or an aortic valve area (AVA) of < 0.8 cm2 (or AVA index < 0.5 cm2/m2)
  • Symptomatic due to aortic valve stenosis as demonstrated by NYHA Functional Class ≥ II
  • The subject or the subject's legal representative was informed of the nature of the study, agreed to its provisions and provided written informed consent as approved by the Institutional Review Board of the respective clinical site.
  • The subject agreed to comply follow-up evaluation
  • is evaluated by at least one cardiologist and two cardiovascular surgeon, and they agreed that medical factors precluding operation suitable for surgery (the probability of death or serious, irreversible morbidity exceeded 50%)
  • STS score ≥ 10%

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refuses aortic valve replacement surgery.
  • Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤ 1 month before the intended treatment [defined as: Q wave MI, or non-Q wave MI with total CK elevation of CK-MB ≥ twice normal in the presence of MB elevation and/or troponin level elevation (WHO definition)].
  • Aortic valve is a congenital unicuspid or congenital bicuspid valve, or is non-calcified.
  • Mixed aortic valve disease (aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation with predominant aortic regurgitation >3+).
  • Any therapeutic invasive cardiac procedure resulting in a permanent implant that is performed within 30 days (6 month if DES implant)
  • Implanted any heart valve prosthesis, prosthetic valve ring, severe mitral valve ring calcification (MAC), severe(>3+)mitral valve insufficiency, or Gorelin symptom
  • Blood dyscrasia such as leukopenia (WBC < 3×109/L), acute anemia (Hgb < 90 g/L), thrombocytopenia (PLT < 50×109/L), bleeding diathesis, or history of coagulopathy.
  • Untreated clinically significant coronary artery disease requiring revascularization
  • Hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic therapy or mechanical hemodynamic support devices
  • Need for emergency surgery for any reason
  • Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with or without obstruction (HOCM)
  • Severe ventricular dysfunction with LVEF < 20%
  • Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation
  • Active peptic ulcer or upper gastro-intestinal bleeding within the prior 3 months
  • A known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin, ticlopidine, clopidogrel, Nitinol, or sensitivity to contrast media which cannot be adequately pre-medicated.
  • Native aortic annulus size < 20 mm or> 29 mm as measured by echocardiogram.
  • Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA) within 6 months, including TIA.
  • Renal insufficiency (creatinine > 3.0 mg/dL) and/or end stage renal disease requiring chronic dialysis.
  • Life expectancy < 12 months
  • Significant abdominal or thoracic aorta disease, including aneurysm (defined as maximal luminal diameter 5cm or greater), marked tortuosity (hyperacute bend), aortic arch atheroma (especially if thick [> 5 mm], protruding or ulcerated), narrowing of the abdominal aorta (especially with calcification and surface irregularities), or severe "unfolding" and tortuosity of the thoracic aorta
  • Iliofemoral vessel characteristics that would preclude safe placement of 16F or 18F introducer sheath such as severe obstructive calcification, severe tortuosity or vessel size diameter < 7 mm.
  • Currently participating in an investigational drug or another device study.
  • Active bacterial endocarditis or other active infections.
  • Bulky calcified aortic valve leaflets in close proximity to coronary ostia

Sites / Locations

  • Fu Wai Hospital, CAMS & PUMARecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Venus A-Valve

Arm Description

single arm with intervention that percutaneous implantation of the Venus MedTech Aortic Valve Prosthesis

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

All cause mortality and major stroke at 12 months post-procedure.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Valve performance and placement at 6 and 12 months post-procedure

Full Information

First Posted
September 7, 2012
Last Updated
January 3, 2015
Sponsor
Venus MedTech (HangZhou) Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01683474
Brief Title
Safety and Performance of TAVI of Venus MedTech Aortic Valve Prosthesis
Acronym
Venus-A
Official Title
Clinical Evaluation of the Safety and Performance of Percutaneous Implantation of the Venus MedTech Aortic Valve Prosthesis for Patients Who Cannot Undergo Surgical Valve Replacement
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2015
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
September 2012 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
February 2016 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
April 2016 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Venus MedTech (HangZhou) Inc.

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
objectives Evaluate the performance of Venus MedTech aortic valve prosthesis intervention by femoral artery Evaluate safety and clinical benefit of percutaneous implantation of the Venue MedTech aortic valve prosthesis. Continuous observe 12 months of safety and efficacy. Approximately 80 patients presenting with native aortic valve stenosis necessitating valve replacement which are considered unsuitable for Surgical Valve Replacement, with a high surgical risk, as attested to by both the surgeon and the cardiologist are recruited in the study. Safety and performance will be evaluated at discharge and at 30 days post procedure. Valve safety, performance and placement will be followed up at 6 and 12 months post-procedure.
Detailed Description
A prospective OPC study to evaluate its performance and long-term safety and effectiveness of Venus-A aortic valve.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Aortic Valve Stenosis, Aortic Valve Calcification
Keywords
aortic valve stenosis, Calcification, TAVI, aortic valve Prosthesis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
80 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Venus A-Valve
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
single arm with intervention that percutaneous implantation of the Venus MedTech Aortic Valve Prosthesis
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Venus MedTech Aortic Valve Prosthesis
Other Intervention Name(s)
Venus A-Valve, Venus A-Valve System
Intervention Description
Percutaneous implantation of aortic valve of Venus-A
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
All cause mortality and major stroke at 12 months post-procedure.
Time Frame
12 months post-procedure
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Valve performance and placement at 6 and 12 months post-procedure
Time Frame
6 and 12 months post-procedure

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Senile degenerative aortic valve stenosis with echocardiography derived criteria: mean gradient ≥ 40 mm Hg, or jet velocity ≥ 4.0 m/s, or an aortic valve area (AVA) of < 0.8 cm2 (or AVA index < 0.5 cm2/m2) Symptomatic due to aortic valve stenosis as demonstrated by NYHA Functional Class ≥ II The subject or the subject's legal representative was informed of the nature of the study, agreed to its provisions and provided written informed consent as approved by the Institutional Review Board of the respective clinical site. The subject agreed to comply follow-up evaluation is evaluated by at least one cardiologist and two cardiovascular surgeon, and they agreed that medical factors precluding operation suitable for surgery (the probability of death or serious, irreversible morbidity exceeded 50%) STS score ≥ 10% Exclusion Criteria: Patient refuses aortic valve replacement surgery. Evidence of an acute myocardial infarction ≤ 1 month before the intended treatment [defined as: Q wave MI, or non-Q wave MI with total CK elevation of CK-MB ≥ twice normal in the presence of MB elevation and/or troponin level elevation (WHO definition)]. Aortic valve is a congenital unicuspid or congenital bicuspid valve, or is non-calcified. Mixed aortic valve disease (aortic stenosis and aortic regurgitation with predominant aortic regurgitation >3+). Any therapeutic invasive cardiac procedure resulting in a permanent implant that is performed within 30 days (6 month if DES implant) Implanted any heart valve prosthesis, prosthetic valve ring, severe mitral valve ring calcification (MAC), severe(>3+)mitral valve insufficiency, or Gorelin symptom Blood dyscrasia such as leukopenia (WBC < 3×109/L), acute anemia (Hgb < 90 g/L), thrombocytopenia (PLT < 50×109/L), bleeding diathesis, or history of coagulopathy. Untreated clinically significant coronary artery disease requiring revascularization Hemodynamic instability requiring inotropic therapy or mechanical hemodynamic support devices Need for emergency surgery for any reason Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with or without obstruction (HOCM) Severe ventricular dysfunction with LVEF < 20% Echocardiographic evidence of intracardiac mass, thrombus or vegetation Active peptic ulcer or upper gastro-intestinal bleeding within the prior 3 months A known hypersensitivity or contraindication to aspirin, heparin, ticlopidine, clopidogrel, Nitinol, or sensitivity to contrast media which cannot be adequately pre-medicated. Native aortic annulus size < 20 mm or> 29 mm as measured by echocardiogram. Cerebrovascular Accident (CVA) within 6 months, including TIA. Renal insufficiency (creatinine > 3.0 mg/dL) and/or end stage renal disease requiring chronic dialysis. Life expectancy < 12 months Significant abdominal or thoracic aorta disease, including aneurysm (defined as maximal luminal diameter 5cm or greater), marked tortuosity (hyperacute bend), aortic arch atheroma (especially if thick [> 5 mm], protruding or ulcerated), narrowing of the abdominal aorta (especially with calcification and surface irregularities), or severe "unfolding" and tortuosity of the thoracic aorta Iliofemoral vessel characteristics that would preclude safe placement of 16F or 18F introducer sheath such as severe obstructive calcification, severe tortuosity or vessel size diameter < 7 mm. Currently participating in an investigational drug or another device study. Active bacterial endocarditis or other active infections. Bulky calcified aortic valve leaflets in close proximity to coronary ostia
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Runlin Gao, MD
Phone
88398866
Ext
8266
Email
gaorunlin4study@gmail.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ruilin Gao, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Fuwai Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Fu Wai Hospital, CAMS & PUMA
City
Beijing
State/Province
Beijing
ZIP/Postal Code
100037
Country
China
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Runlin Gao, MD
Email
gaorunlin4study@gmail.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Runlin Gao, MD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
31777470
Citation
Lei WH, Liao YB, Wang ZJ, Ou YW, Tsauo JY, Li YJ, Xiong TY, Zhao ZG, Wei X, Meng W, Feng Y, Chen M. Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement in Patients with Aortic Stenosis Having Coronary Cusp Fusion versus Mixed Cusp Fusion Nonraphe Bicuspid Aortic Valve. J Interv Cardiol. 2019 Nov 3;2019:7348964. doi: 10.1155/2019/7348964. eCollection 2019.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
29246428
Citation
Liao YB, Li YJ, Xiong TY, Ou YW, Lv WY, He JL, Li YM, Zhao ZG, Wei X, Xu YN, Feng Y, Chen M. Comparison of procedural, clinical and valve performance results of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with bicuspid versus tricuspid aortic stenosis. Int J Cardiol. 2018 Mar 1;254:69-74. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2017.12.013. Epub 2017 Dec 9.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
25630494
Citation
Jilaihawi H, Wu Y, Yang Y, Xu L, Chen M, Wang J, Kong X, Zhang R, Wang M, Lv B, Wang W, Xu B, Makkar RR, Sievert H, Gao R. Morphological characteristics of severe aortic stenosis in China: imaging corelab observations from the first Chinese transcatheter aortic valve trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2015 Mar;85 Suppl 1:752-61. doi: 10.1002/ccd.25863. Epub 2015 Feb 19.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Safety and Performance of TAVI of Venus MedTech Aortic Valve Prosthesis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs