Back to resultsEffects of Two Doses of a Common Cold Treatment on Alertness
Primary Purpose
Common Cold
Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
paracetamol + caffeine
paracetamol
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Common Cold focused on measuring alertness
Eligibility Criteria
- Participants with symptoms of cold < 96 hours, rating of at least '2' on malaise at least 4 other symptoms of cold.
- No history of clinically significant perennial rhinitis, no recent antibiotic, antihistamine or cold treatment, no caffeine in the previous 12 hours, no psychoactive medication in the 14 days prior to screening, no pregnancy, breastfeeding or participation in this trial, or another trial in the 30 days prior to screening.
Sites / Locations
- Common Cold Centre
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm 4
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
highest dose Paracetamol + caffeine
low-dose Paracetamol + caffeine
high dose paracetamol
low dose paracetamol
Arm Description
highest dose of Paracetamol and caffeine
lowest dose of Paracetamol and caffeine
highest dose paracetamol
lowest dose paracetamol
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change From Baseline in Number of Accurate Responses to Rapid Visual Information Processing (RVIP) Cognitive Test
The RVIP assessed the performance of visual attention mechanisms in remaining vigilant to periodically occurring events. The number of accurate responses to RVIP task was determined from the cognitive function computerised output. Participants monitored a series of single numbers (0-9) appearing in the centre of the screen. During the RVIP task, participants responded to consecutive sequences of three odd or three even numbers by pressing the corresponding response button as quickly and accurately as possible. This was identified in the output file by a value of '1' in 'TARGET=1' column. Also, the response time (in seconds) was recorded in the 'RT' column. If the subject correctly responded to the target, this was identified by a value of '1' in the 'CORRECT=1' column. The number of accurate responses was calculated as the total number of records where 'CORRECT=1' had a value of '1'. The test lasted approximately 9 minutes and number of accurate responses to stimulus was calculated.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Change From Baseline in Number of Accurate Responses to RVIP Cognitive Test
The RVIP assessed the performance of visual attention mechanisms in remaining vigilant to periodically occurring events. The number of accurate responses to RVIP task was determined from the cognitive function computerised output. Participants monitored a series of single numbers (0-9) appearing in the centre of the screen. During the RVIP task, participants responded to consecutive sequences of three odd or three even numbers by pressing the corresponding response button as quickly and accurately as possible. This was identified in the output file by a value of '1' in 'TARGET=1' column. Also, the response time (in seconds) was recorded in the 'RT' column. If the subject correctly responded to the target, this was identified by a value of '1' in the 'CORRECT=1' column. The number of accurate responses was calculated as the total number of records where 'CORRECT=1' had a value of '1'. The test lasted approximately 9 minutes and number of accurate responses to stimulus was calculated.
Change From Baseline in Mean Time of Accurate Responses to RVIP Cognitive Task
The mean time of accurate responses was defined as the mean reaction time for the correct responses. For records with '1' in the 'CORRECT=1' column, the mean time of accurate response was calculated as the summation of the response time values divided by number of records with '1' in the 'CORRECT=1' column. The result was multiplied by 1000 to convert into milliseconds (msecs).
Change From Baseline in Number of Inaccurate and Missed Responses to RVIP Cognitive Task
The no. of inaccurate responses to RVIP was determined from cognitive function computerised output. Participants monitored a series of single numbers (0-9) appearing in the centre of screen. They responded to consecutive sequences of 3 odd or even numbers by pressing the corresponding response button. This was identified in the output file by a value of '1' in the 'TARGET=1' column. If a subject responded incorrectly to stimuli (pressed the response button at the wrong time), this was identified by a value of '-1' in the 'CORRECT=1' column. The no. of incorrect responses was calculated as the total no. of records where 'CORRECT=1' had a value of '-1'. If the subject missed a target (failed to press the response button within 600 msecs of being presented with a string of 3 consecutive even or odd numbers), this was considered a missed response and was calculated as the no. of records where there was a value of '1' in the 'TARGET=1' column and a value of '0' in the 'CORRECT=1' column.
Change From Baseline in Number of Accurate Responses to Sustained Attention Tasks (SAT) Cognitive Test
Auditory and visual attention of participants was evaluated using a validated Sustained Attention task. For the sustained auditory attention task, participants were required to respond whenever they heard the number '8' in a continuous stream of numbers presented through headphones. This was identified in the output file by a value of '8' in the 'NUMBER' column. For the sustained visual attention task, participants were required to respond to the letter 's' every time it appeared in a continuous stream of letters presented on a screen. This was identified in the output file by a value of 's' in the 'LETTER' column. If the subject correctly responded to the target, this was identified by a value of '1' in the 'CORRECT=1' column. The number of accurate responses was calculated as the total number of records where 'CORRECT=1' had a value of '1'.
Change From Baseline in Mean Time of Accurate Responses to SAT Cognitive Task
The mean time of accurate responses was defined as the mean reaction time for the correct responses. For records with '1' in the 'CORRECT=1' column, the mean time of accurate response was calculated as the summation of the response time values divided by number of records with '1' in the 'CORRECT=1' column. The result was multiplied by 1000 to convert into milliseconds (msecs).
Change From Baseline in Number of Incorrect and Missed Responses to SAT Cognitive Test
For sustained auditory attention task, participants were required to respond on hearing the no. '8' in a continuous stream of numbers through headphones. It was identified in output file by a value of '8' in 'NUMBER' column. For sustained visual attention task, participants responded to letter 's' every time it appeared in a continuous stream of letters presented on screen. This was identified in output file by a value of 's' in 'LETTER' column. If a subject responded incorrectly (pressed the response button at the wrong time), it was identified by a value of '-1' in 'CORRECT=1' column. The no. of incorrect responses was calculated as total no. of records where 'CORRECT=1' had a value of '-1'. The no. of missed responses (when subject failed to press the response button on hearing the number '8' or seeing the letter 's'), was calculated as the no. of records where there was a value of '8' in 'NUMBER' column or 's' in the 'LETTER' column and a value of '0' in the 'CORRECT=1' column.
Change From Baseline in Number of Valid Responses to Divided Attention Task (DAT) Cognitive Test
Auditory and visual attention of participants was evaluated using a validated Divided Attention task. Participants were required to respond whenever they heard the number '8' in a continuous stream of numbers presented through headphones or saw a letter 's' on the screen . This was identified in the output file by a value of '8' in the 'NUMBER' column or by a value of 's' in the 'LETTER' column. If the subject correctly responded to the target, this was identified by a value of '1' in the 'CORRECT=1' column. The number of accurate responses was calculated as the total number of records where 'CORRECT=1' had a value of '1'.
Change From Baseline in Mean Time of Accurate Responses to DAT Cognitive Test
The mean time of accurate responses was defined as the mean reaction time for the correct responses. For records with '1' in the 'CORRECT=1' column, the mean time of accurate response was calculated as the summation of the response time values divided by number of records with '1' in the 'CORRECT=1' column. The result was multiplied by 1000 to convert into milliseconds (msecs).
Change From Baseline in Number of Incorrect and Missed Responses to DAT Cognitive Test
For the Divided Attention task, participants were required to respond on hearing the no. '8' in a continuous stream of numbers through headphones or seeing a letter 's' on screen. This was identified in the output file by a value of '8' in 'NUMBER' column or 's' in 'LETTER' column. If a subject responded incorrectly (pressed the response button at the wrong time), this was identified by a value of '-1' in 'CORRECT=1' column. The number of incorrect responses was calculated as the total no. of records where 'CORRECT=1' had a value of '-1'. If the subject missed a target (failed to press the response button on hearing the no. '8' or seeing the letter 's'), this was considered a missed response. The number of missed responses was calculated as the no. of records where there was a value of '8' in 'NUMBER' column or 's' in 'LETTER' column and a value of '0' in the 'CORRECT=1' column.
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01686646
Brief Title
Effects of Two Doses of a Common Cold Treatment on Alertness
Official Title
Effects of Two Doses of a Common Cold Treatment on Cognitive Function
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
July 2014
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 2011 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
November 2012 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 2012 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This study will investigate any improvement in alertness and performance based on cognitive function and mood assessment in subjects suffering the common cold, when taking a novel paracetamol and caffeine combination verses paracetamol alone.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Common Cold
Keywords
alertness
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
240 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
highest dose Paracetamol + caffeine
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
highest dose of Paracetamol and caffeine
Arm Title
low-dose Paracetamol + caffeine
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
lowest dose of Paracetamol and caffeine
Arm Title
high dose paracetamol
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
highest dose paracetamol
Arm Title
low dose paracetamol
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
lowest dose paracetamol
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
paracetamol + caffeine
Intervention Description
paracetamol with caffeine
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
paracetamol
Intervention Description
paracetamol
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Number of Accurate Responses to Rapid Visual Information Processing (RVIP) Cognitive Test
Description
The RVIP assessed the performance of visual attention mechanisms in remaining vigilant to periodically occurring events. The number of accurate responses to RVIP task was determined from the cognitive function computerised output. Participants monitored a series of single numbers (0-9) appearing in the centre of the screen. During the RVIP task, participants responded to consecutive sequences of three odd or three even numbers by pressing the corresponding response button as quickly and accurately as possible. This was identified in the output file by a value of '1' in 'TARGET=1' column. Also, the response time (in seconds) was recorded in the 'RT' column. If the subject correctly responded to the target, this was identified by a value of '1' in the 'CORRECT=1' column. The number of accurate responses was calculated as the total number of records where 'CORRECT=1' had a value of '1'. The test lasted approximately 9 minutes and number of accurate responses to stimulus was calculated.
Time Frame
Baseline to 60 minutes post treatment administration
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in Number of Accurate Responses to RVIP Cognitive Test
Description
The RVIP assessed the performance of visual attention mechanisms in remaining vigilant to periodically occurring events. The number of accurate responses to RVIP task was determined from the cognitive function computerised output. Participants monitored a series of single numbers (0-9) appearing in the centre of the screen. During the RVIP task, participants responded to consecutive sequences of three odd or three even numbers by pressing the corresponding response button as quickly and accurately as possible. This was identified in the output file by a value of '1' in 'TARGET=1' column. Also, the response time (in seconds) was recorded in the 'RT' column. If the subject correctly responded to the target, this was identified by a value of '1' in the 'CORRECT=1' column. The number of accurate responses was calculated as the total number of records where 'CORRECT=1' had a value of '1'. The test lasted approximately 9 minutes and number of accurate responses to stimulus was calculated.
Time Frame
Baseline to 120 minutes post treatment administration
Title
Change From Baseline in Mean Time of Accurate Responses to RVIP Cognitive Task
Description
The mean time of accurate responses was defined as the mean reaction time for the correct responses. For records with '1' in the 'CORRECT=1' column, the mean time of accurate response was calculated as the summation of the response time values divided by number of records with '1' in the 'CORRECT=1' column. The result was multiplied by 1000 to convert into milliseconds (msecs).
Time Frame
Baseline, 60 minutes and upto 120 minutes post treatment administration
Title
Change From Baseline in Number of Inaccurate and Missed Responses to RVIP Cognitive Task
Description
The no. of inaccurate responses to RVIP was determined from cognitive function computerised output. Participants monitored a series of single numbers (0-9) appearing in the centre of screen. They responded to consecutive sequences of 3 odd or even numbers by pressing the corresponding response button. This was identified in the output file by a value of '1' in the 'TARGET=1' column. If a subject responded incorrectly to stimuli (pressed the response button at the wrong time), this was identified by a value of '-1' in the 'CORRECT=1' column. The no. of incorrect responses was calculated as the total no. of records where 'CORRECT=1' had a value of '-1'. If the subject missed a target (failed to press the response button within 600 msecs of being presented with a string of 3 consecutive even or odd numbers), this was considered a missed response and was calculated as the no. of records where there was a value of '1' in the 'TARGET=1' column and a value of '0' in the 'CORRECT=1' column.
Time Frame
Baseline, 60 minutes and up to 120 minutes post treatment administration
Title
Change From Baseline in Number of Accurate Responses to Sustained Attention Tasks (SAT) Cognitive Test
Description
Auditory and visual attention of participants was evaluated using a validated Sustained Attention task. For the sustained auditory attention task, participants were required to respond whenever they heard the number '8' in a continuous stream of numbers presented through headphones. This was identified in the output file by a value of '8' in the 'NUMBER' column. For the sustained visual attention task, participants were required to respond to the letter 's' every time it appeared in a continuous stream of letters presented on a screen. This was identified in the output file by a value of 's' in the 'LETTER' column. If the subject correctly responded to the target, this was identified by a value of '1' in the 'CORRECT=1' column. The number of accurate responses was calculated as the total number of records where 'CORRECT=1' had a value of '1'.
Time Frame
Baseline, 60 minutes and up to 120 minutes post treatment administration
Title
Change From Baseline in Mean Time of Accurate Responses to SAT Cognitive Task
Description
The mean time of accurate responses was defined as the mean reaction time for the correct responses. For records with '1' in the 'CORRECT=1' column, the mean time of accurate response was calculated as the summation of the response time values divided by number of records with '1' in the 'CORRECT=1' column. The result was multiplied by 1000 to convert into milliseconds (msecs).
Time Frame
Baseline, 30 minutes and up to 60 minutes post treatment administration
Title
Change From Baseline in Number of Incorrect and Missed Responses to SAT Cognitive Test
Description
For sustained auditory attention task, participants were required to respond on hearing the no. '8' in a continuous stream of numbers through headphones. It was identified in output file by a value of '8' in 'NUMBER' column. For sustained visual attention task, participants responded to letter 's' every time it appeared in a continuous stream of letters presented on screen. This was identified in output file by a value of 's' in 'LETTER' column. If a subject responded incorrectly (pressed the response button at the wrong time), it was identified by a value of '-1' in 'CORRECT=1' column. The no. of incorrect responses was calculated as total no. of records where 'CORRECT=1' had a value of '-1'. The no. of missed responses (when subject failed to press the response button on hearing the number '8' or seeing the letter 's'), was calculated as the no. of records where there was a value of '8' in 'NUMBER' column or 's' in the 'LETTER' column and a value of '0' in the 'CORRECT=1' column.
Time Frame
Baseline, 60 minutes and up to 120 minutes post treatment administration
Title
Change From Baseline in Number of Valid Responses to Divided Attention Task (DAT) Cognitive Test
Description
Auditory and visual attention of participants was evaluated using a validated Divided Attention task. Participants were required to respond whenever they heard the number '8' in a continuous stream of numbers presented through headphones or saw a letter 's' on the screen . This was identified in the output file by a value of '8' in the 'NUMBER' column or by a value of 's' in the 'LETTER' column. If the subject correctly responded to the target, this was identified by a value of '1' in the 'CORRECT=1' column. The number of accurate responses was calculated as the total number of records where 'CORRECT=1' had a value of '1'.
Time Frame
Baseline, 60 minutes and up to 120 minutes post treatment administration
Title
Change From Baseline in Mean Time of Accurate Responses to DAT Cognitive Test
Description
The mean time of accurate responses was defined as the mean reaction time for the correct responses. For records with '1' in the 'CORRECT=1' column, the mean time of accurate response was calculated as the summation of the response time values divided by number of records with '1' in the 'CORRECT=1' column. The result was multiplied by 1000 to convert into milliseconds (msecs).
Time Frame
Baseline, 60 minutes and up to 120 minutes post treatment administration
Title
Change From Baseline in Number of Incorrect and Missed Responses to DAT Cognitive Test
Description
For the Divided Attention task, participants were required to respond on hearing the no. '8' in a continuous stream of numbers through headphones or seeing a letter 's' on screen. This was identified in the output file by a value of '8' in 'NUMBER' column or 's' in 'LETTER' column. If a subject responded incorrectly (pressed the response button at the wrong time), this was identified by a value of '-1' in 'CORRECT=1' column. The number of incorrect responses was calculated as the total no. of records where 'CORRECT=1' had a value of '-1'. If the subject missed a target (failed to press the response button on hearing the no. '8' or seeing the letter 's'), this was considered a missed response. The number of missed responses was calculated as the no. of records where there was a value of '8' in 'NUMBER' column or 's' in 'LETTER' column and a value of '0' in the 'CORRECT=1' column.
Time Frame
Baseline, 60 minutes and up to 120 minutes post treatment administration
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Participants with symptoms of cold < 96 hours, rating of at least '2' on malaise at least 4 other symptoms of cold.
No history of clinically significant perennial rhinitis, no recent antibiotic, antihistamine or cold treatment, no caffeine in the previous 12 hours, no psychoactive medication in the 14 days prior to screening, no pregnancy, breastfeeding or participation in this trial, or another trial in the 30 days prior to screening.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
GSK Clinical Trials
Organizational Affiliation
GlaxoSmithKline
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Common Cold Centre
City
Cardiff
State/Province
Wales
Country
United Kingdom
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Effects of Two Doses of a Common Cold Treatment on Alertness
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs