search
Back to results

Phase II Trial of Pimasertib Versus Dacarbazine in N-Ras Mutated Cutaneous Melanoma

Primary Purpose

N-Ras Mutated Locally Advanced or Metastasis Malignant Cutaneous Melanoma

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Pimasertib
Dacarbazine
Sponsored by
EMD Serono
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for N-Ras Mutated Locally Advanced or Metastasis Malignant Cutaneous Melanoma focused on measuring Cutaneous Melanoma, Dacarbazine, Pimasertib, N-Ras

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with measurable, histologically or cytologically confirmed, locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous melanoma (stage III c or M1ac) N-Ras mutated. If N-Ras mutational status is unknown at screening, it must be prospectively defined before inclusion. If N-Ras mutational status is already known before screening, it must be retrospectively confirmed after inclusion by the sponsor.
  • Tumor lesions amenable to biopsy or available tumor tissue as archival samples.
  • Age greater than or equal to (>=) 18 years.
  • Has read and understood the informed consent form and is willing and able to give informed consent. Fully understands requirements of the trial and willing to comply with all trial visits and assessments.
  • Women of childbearing potential must have a negative blood pregnancy test at the screening visit. For the purposes of this trial, women of childbearing potential are defined as: "All female subjects after puberty unless they are post-menopausal for at least two years, or are surgically sterile".
  • Female subjects of childbearing potential and male subjects with female partners of childbearing potential must be willing to avoid pregnancy by using an adequate method of contraception for 2 weeks prior to, during and four weeks after the last dose of trial medication. Effective contraception is defined as the method of contraception with a failure rate of less than 1% per year. Adequate contraception is defined as follows: two barrier methods or one barrier method with a spermicidal or intrauterine device or oral contraception for female partners of male subjects.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has previous systemic treatment for locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous melanoma (excluding adjuvant treatment).
  • Has non-measurable lesions, disease not evaluable by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v. 1.1
  • Has an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) >1.
  • Has bone marrow impairment as evidenced by Hemoglobin <10.0 g/dL, Neutrophil count <1.5 * 10^9/L, platelets <100 * 10^9/L.
  • Has renal impairment as evidenced by calculated creatinine clearance <60 mL/min (according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula).
  • Has liver function abnormality as defined by total bilirubin >1.5 * Upper Limit of Normal (ULN), or aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >2.5 * ULN, for subjects with liver involvement AST/ALT >5 * ULN.
  • Has significant cardiac conduction abnormalities, including QTc prolongation of >480 milliseconds and/or pacemaker or clinically relevant impaired cardiovascular function.
  • Has hypertension uncontrolled by medication
  • Has retinal degenerative disease (hereditary retinal degeneration or age-related macular degeneration), history of uveitis, or history of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) or any eye condition that would be considered a risk factor for RVO (e.g., uncontrolled glaucoma or ocular hypertension).
  • Has known active central nervous system (CNS) metastases unless previously radiotherapy treated, stable by CT scan for at least 3 months without evidence of cerebral edema and no requirements for corticosteroids or anticonvulsants.
  • History of difficulty swallowing, malabsorption or other chronic gastro-intestinal disease, or conditions that may hamper compliance and/or absorption of the tested product.
  • Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positivity, active hepatitis C, or active hepatitis B.
  • Has undergone surgical intervention within 28 days from Day 1 of trial drug treatment.
  • Has received extensive prior radiotherapy on more than 30% of bone marrow reserves, or prior bone marrow/stem cell transplantation within 5 years from Day 1 of trial drug treatment.
  • Has history of any other significant medical disease such as major gastric or small bowel surgery, recent drainage of significant volumes of ascites or pleural effusion or has a psychiatric condition that might impair the subject well-being or preclude full participation in the trial.
  • Has known hypersensitivity to dacarbazine.
  • Is a pregnant or nursing female.
  • Participated in another clinical trial within the past 28 days.
  • Has creatine phosphokinase (CPK) level at baseline National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Grade >=2 (i.e > 2.5 * ULN), and/or has a previous history of myositis or rhabdomyolysis.
  • Is suitable for treatment with an approved B-Raf inhibitor (exclusion criteria implemented in German amendment only).

Sites / Locations

  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Please contact the US Medical Information in
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Pimasertib

Dacarbazine

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Progression Free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the duration (in weeks) from randomization until the first progressive disease (PD) observation as assessed by the Investigator according to Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, or death due to any cause when death occurred within 12 weeks after the last tumor assessment (otherwise censored), whichever occurred first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum since the treatment started (including baseline), or appearance of one or more new lesions, and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Objective Response Rate (ORR)
ORR was defined as the percentage of subjects with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST version 1.1 criteria. CR: defined as disappearance of all target and all non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (<) 10 millimeter (mm). PR: defined as at least a 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters along with absence of new lesions and disease progression in non-target lesions.
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
DCR was defined as the percentage of subjects with CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) for greater than (>) 3 months assessed by investigator according to RECIST version 1.1. CR: defined as disappearance of all target and all non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than <10 mm. PR: defined as at least a 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters along with absence of new lesions and disease progression in non-target lesions. SD: defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.
Percentage of Subjects With Progression-free Survival (PFS) at 6 Months
PFS was defined as the duration (in weeks) from randomization until the first progressive disease (PD) observation as assessed by the Investigator according to Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, or death due to any cause when death occurred within 12 weeks after the last tumor assessment, whichever occurred first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum since the treatment started (including baseline), or appearance of one or more new lesions, and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Percentage of Subjects with PFS at 6 Months were reported.
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time (in months) from randomization to death due to any cause. Subjects without a death date were to be censored at the minimum of last known date alive, defined as the latest date available on the electronic case report form, and cut-off date.
Percentage of Subjects With Overall Survival (OS) at 12 Months
OS was defined as the time (in months) from randomization to death due to any cause. Subjects without a death date were to be censored at the minimum of last known date alive, defined as the latest date available on the electronic case report form, and cut-off date. Percentage of Subjects with OS at 12 months were reported.
Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Quality of Life Assessed by Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy - Melanoma Total Score (FACT-M TS) at Day 1 of Pre-Specified Cycles and End of Treatment (EOT)
QoL assessed using Function Assessment Cancer Therapy-melanoma (FACT-M) assessment tool. This includes 27-item FACT-General (FACT-G) questionnaire which consists of 24 questions;7 relating to physical well-being (PWB),7 relating to social/family well-being (SWB),6 relating to emotional well-being (EWB) and 7 relating to functional well-being (FWB). Also, it includes melanoma-specific subscale consists of 16 questions for Melanoma Subscale (MS) and 8 questions for Melanoma Surgery Scale (MSS).Each of these questions could have a response of Not at all, a little bit, somewhat, quite a bit and very much. The responses were given a value between 0 and 4 with 4 being best response. The FACT-M Total Score (FACT-M TS) ranges from 0 to 172 and is derived as follows: FACT-M TS= PWB Score + SWB Score + EWB Score + FWB Score + MS Score. Higher scores represent a better quality of life.
Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Quality of Life Assessed by Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy - Melanoma Trial Outcome Index (FACT-M TOI) at Day 1 of Pre-Specified Cycles and End of Treatment (EOT)
QoL assessed using FACT-M assessment tool. This includes 27-item FACT-G questionnaire which consists of 24 questions; 7 relating to PWB, 7 relating to SWB, 6 relating to EWB and 7 relating to FWB. Also, it includes melanoma-specific subscale consists of 16 questions for MS and 8 questions for the MSS. Each of these questions could have a response of Not at all, a little bit, somewhat, quite a bit and very much. The responses were given a value between 0 and 4 with 4 being best response. The FACT-M Trial Outcome Index (FACT-M TOI) ranges from 0 to a high of 120 and is derived as: FACT-M TOI = PWB Score + FWB Score +MS Score. Higher scores represent a better quality of life.
Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation or TEAEs Leading to Death
AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this the study drug. An AE was defined as any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. A serious AE was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 33 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. TEAEs include both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. TEAEs were to be reported separately for dacarbazine, pimasertib and pimasertib (crossover) reporting arms.
Number of Subjects With Adverse Events (AEs) of Special Interest
Adverse events of special interest included ocular retinal vein occlusion, serious retinal detachment or similar retinal abnormality characterized by accumulation of serous fluid in the retina, creatine phosphokinase (CPK) elevation and isoenzyme TEAE of Special Interest (Grade >=2) and acute renal failure (Grade >=2). Subjects were presented under 3 reporting groups: Dacarbazine group: for subjects who received at least 1 dose of dacarbazine; Pimasertib group: for subjects who received at least 1 dose of pimasertib; Pimasertib (Crossover) group: for subjects who were initially randomized and received dacarbazine, but crossed over to pimasertib treatment on progression of their disease.
Number of Subjects With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Laboratory Parameter, Vital Signs, Electrocardiogram (ECG) and Ophthalmologic Findings
Subjects were presented under 3 reporting groups: Dacarbazine group: for subjects who received at least 1 dose of dacarbazine; Pimasertib group: for subjects who received at least 1 dose of pimasertib; Pimasertib (Crossover) group: for subjects who were initially randomized and received dacarbazine, but crossed over to pimasertib treatment on progression of their disease.

Full Information

First Posted
September 14, 2012
Last Updated
December 5, 2017
Sponsor
EMD Serono
Collaborators
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01693068
Brief Title
Phase II Trial of Pimasertib Versus Dacarbazine in N-Ras Mutated Cutaneous Melanoma
Official Title
A Multicenter, Open Label, Randomized Phase II Trial of the MEK Inhibitor Pimasertib or Dacarbazine in Previously Untreated Subjects With N-Ras Mutated Locally Advanced or Metastatic Malignant Cutaneous Melanoma
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
December 5, 2012 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 4, 2015 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 24, 2016 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
EMD Serono
Collaborators
Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a Phase 2, multicenter, randomized, controlled, open-label trial of pimasertib versus dacarbazine aimed to confirm the activity of pimasertib in previously untreated subjects with N-Ras mutated locally advanced or metastatic malignant cutaneous melanoma by comparing the progression-free survival (PFS) of subjects treated with either pimasertib or dacarbazine and by getting a better understanding of the efficacy, safety, pharmacogenomics (PGx) and their relationship with pimasertib exposure.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
N-Ras Mutated Locally Advanced or Metastasis Malignant Cutaneous Melanoma
Keywords
Cutaneous Melanoma, Dacarbazine, Pimasertib, N-Ras

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
194 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Pimasertib
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Dacarbazine
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Pimasertib
Other Intervention Name(s)
MSC1936369B, AS703026
Intervention Description
Subjects will receive pimasertib orally as monotherapy at a dose of 60 milligram (mg) twice daily continuously. Treatment will consist of repeated 21-day cycles which will continue until progression of the disease, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of informed consent, or death, whichever occurs first.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Dacarbazine
Intervention Description
Subjects will receive dacarbazine intravenously at dose of 1000 milligram per square meter (mg/m^2) of body surface area every 3 weeks on Day 1 of each 21-days cycle until progression of the disease, unacceptable toxicity, withdrawal of informed consent, or death, whichever occurs first. Eligible subjects with documented tumor progression on dacarbazine will offer to switch to pimasertib treatment.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Description
PFS was defined as the duration (in weeks) from randomization until the first progressive disease (PD) observation as assessed by the Investigator according to Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, or death due to any cause when death occurred within 12 weeks after the last tumor assessment (otherwise censored), whichever occurred first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum since the treatment started (including baseline), or appearance of one or more new lesions, and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions.
Time Frame
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to cut-off date (04-Jul-2015)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Description
ORR was defined as the percentage of subjects with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) according to RECIST version 1.1 criteria. CR: defined as disappearance of all target and all non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than (<) 10 millimeter (mm). PR: defined as at least a 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters along with absence of new lesions and disease progression in non-target lesions.
Time Frame
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to cut-off date (04-Jul-2015)
Title
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Description
DCR was defined as the percentage of subjects with CR, PR, or stable disease (SD) for greater than (>) 3 months assessed by investigator according to RECIST version 1.1. CR: defined as disappearance of all target and all non-target lesions. Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have reduction in short axis to less than <10 mm. PR: defined as at least a 30% decrease in sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters along with absence of new lesions and disease progression in non-target lesions. SD: defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for PD, taking as reference the smallest sum diameters while on study.
Time Frame
From date of randomization until the date of first documented progression or date of death from any cause, whichever came first, assessed up to cut-off date (04-Jul-2015)
Title
Percentage of Subjects With Progression-free Survival (PFS) at 6 Months
Description
PFS was defined as the duration (in weeks) from randomization until the first progressive disease (PD) observation as assessed by the Investigator according to Response Evaluation Criteria for Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1, or death due to any cause when death occurred within 12 weeks after the last tumor assessment, whichever occurred first. PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of the target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum since the treatment started (including baseline), or appearance of one or more new lesions, and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions. Percentage of Subjects with PFS at 6 Months were reported.
Time Frame
6 months
Title
Overall Survival (OS)
Description
OS was defined as the time (in months) from randomization to death due to any cause. Subjects without a death date were to be censored at the minimum of last known date alive, defined as the latest date available on the electronic case report form, and cut-off date.
Time Frame
From date of randomization until date of death from any cause, assessed up to cut-off date (04-Jul-2015)
Title
Percentage of Subjects With Overall Survival (OS) at 12 Months
Description
OS was defined as the time (in months) from randomization to death due to any cause. Subjects without a death date were to be censored at the minimum of last known date alive, defined as the latest date available on the electronic case report form, and cut-off date. Percentage of Subjects with OS at 12 months were reported.
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Quality of Life Assessed by Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy - Melanoma Total Score (FACT-M TS) at Day 1 of Pre-Specified Cycles and End of Treatment (EOT)
Description
QoL assessed using Function Assessment Cancer Therapy-melanoma (FACT-M) assessment tool. This includes 27-item FACT-General (FACT-G) questionnaire which consists of 24 questions;7 relating to physical well-being (PWB),7 relating to social/family well-being (SWB),6 relating to emotional well-being (EWB) and 7 relating to functional well-being (FWB). Also, it includes melanoma-specific subscale consists of 16 questions for Melanoma Subscale (MS) and 8 questions for Melanoma Surgery Scale (MSS).Each of these questions could have a response of Not at all, a little bit, somewhat, quite a bit and very much. The responses were given a value between 0 and 4 with 4 being best response. The FACT-M Total Score (FACT-M TS) ranges from 0 to 172 and is derived as follows: FACT-M TS= PWB Score + SWB Score + EWB Score + FWB Score + MS Score. Higher scores represent a better quality of life.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 1 of Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30, 31, 32, 33, 35, 36, 37 and EOT (up to cut-off date [04-Jul-2015])
Title
Change From Baseline in Subject-reported Quality of Life Assessed by Functional Assessment Cancer Therapy - Melanoma Trial Outcome Index (FACT-M TOI) at Day 1 of Pre-Specified Cycles and End of Treatment (EOT)
Description
QoL assessed using FACT-M assessment tool. This includes 27-item FACT-G questionnaire which consists of 24 questions; 7 relating to PWB, 7 relating to SWB, 6 relating to EWB and 7 relating to FWB. Also, it includes melanoma-specific subscale consists of 16 questions for MS and 8 questions for the MSS. Each of these questions could have a response of Not at all, a little bit, somewhat, quite a bit and very much. The responses were given a value between 0 and 4 with 4 being best response. The FACT-M Trial Outcome Index (FACT-M TOI) ranges from 0 to a high of 120 and is derived as: FACT-M TOI = PWB Score + FWB Score +MS Score. Higher scores represent a better quality of life.
Time Frame
Baseline, Day 1 of Cycle 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 30, 31, 32, 33, 35, 36, 37 and EOT (up to cut-off date [04-Jul-2015])
Title
Number of Subjects With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs), Serious TEAEs, TEAEs Leading to Discontinuation or TEAEs Leading to Death
Description
AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence which does not necessarily have a causal relationship with this the study drug. An AE was defined as any unfavourable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease temporally associated with the use of study drug, whether or not considered related to the study drug. A serious AE was an AE that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death; life threatening; persistent/significant disability/incapacity; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; congenital anomaly/birth defect or was otherwise considered medically important. Treatment-emergent are events between first dose of study drug and up to 33 days after last dose that were absent before treatment or that worsened relative to pre-treatment state. TEAEs include both Serious TEAEs and non-serious TEAEs. TEAEs were to be reported separately for dacarbazine, pimasertib and pimasertib (crossover) reporting arms.
Time Frame
Baseline up to cut-off date (04-Jul-2015)
Title
Number of Subjects With Adverse Events (AEs) of Special Interest
Description
Adverse events of special interest included ocular retinal vein occlusion, serious retinal detachment or similar retinal abnormality characterized by accumulation of serous fluid in the retina, creatine phosphokinase (CPK) elevation and isoenzyme TEAE of Special Interest (Grade >=2) and acute renal failure (Grade >=2). Subjects were presented under 3 reporting groups: Dacarbazine group: for subjects who received at least 1 dose of dacarbazine; Pimasertib group: for subjects who received at least 1 dose of pimasertib; Pimasertib (Crossover) group: for subjects who were initially randomized and received dacarbazine, but crossed over to pimasertib treatment on progression of their disease.
Time Frame
Baseline up to cut-off date (04-Jul-2015)
Title
Number of Subjects With Clinically Significant Change From Baseline in Laboratory Parameter, Vital Signs, Electrocardiogram (ECG) and Ophthalmologic Findings
Description
Subjects were presented under 3 reporting groups: Dacarbazine group: for subjects who received at least 1 dose of dacarbazine; Pimasertib group: for subjects who received at least 1 dose of pimasertib; Pimasertib (Crossover) group: for subjects who were initially randomized and received dacarbazine, but crossed over to pimasertib treatment on progression of their disease.
Time Frame
Baseline up to cut-off date (04-Jul-2015)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Subjects with measurable, histologically or cytologically confirmed, locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous melanoma (stage III c or M1ac) N-Ras mutated. If N-Ras mutational status is unknown at screening, it must be prospectively defined before inclusion. If N-Ras mutational status is already known before screening, it must be retrospectively confirmed after inclusion by the sponsor. Tumor lesions amenable to biopsy or available tumor tissue as archival samples. Age greater than or equal to (>=) 18 years. Has read and understood the informed consent form and is willing and able to give informed consent. Fully understands requirements of the trial and willing to comply with all trial visits and assessments. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative blood pregnancy test at the screening visit. For the purposes of this trial, women of childbearing potential are defined as: "All female subjects after puberty unless they are post-menopausal for at least two years, or are surgically sterile". Female subjects of childbearing potential and male subjects with female partners of childbearing potential must be willing to avoid pregnancy by using an adequate method of contraception for 2 weeks prior to, during and four weeks after the last dose of trial medication. Effective contraception is defined as the method of contraception with a failure rate of less than 1% per year. Adequate contraception is defined as follows: two barrier methods or one barrier method with a spermicidal or intrauterine device or oral contraception for female partners of male subjects. Exclusion Criteria: Has previous systemic treatment for locally advanced or metastatic cutaneous melanoma (excluding adjuvant treatment). Has non-measurable lesions, disease not evaluable by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) v. 1.1 Has an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS) >1. Has bone marrow impairment as evidenced by Hemoglobin <10.0 g/dL, Neutrophil count <1.5 * 10^9/L, platelets <100 * 10^9/L. Has renal impairment as evidenced by calculated creatinine clearance <60 mL/min (according to the Cockcroft-Gault formula). Has liver function abnormality as defined by total bilirubin >1.5 * Upper Limit of Normal (ULN), or aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase (ALT) >2.5 * ULN, for subjects with liver involvement AST/ALT >5 * ULN. Has significant cardiac conduction abnormalities, including QTc prolongation of >480 milliseconds and/or pacemaker or clinically relevant impaired cardiovascular function. Has hypertension uncontrolled by medication Has retinal degenerative disease (hereditary retinal degeneration or age-related macular degeneration), history of uveitis, or history of retinal vein occlusion (RVO) or any eye condition that would be considered a risk factor for RVO (e.g., uncontrolled glaucoma or ocular hypertension). Has known active central nervous system (CNS) metastases unless previously radiotherapy treated, stable by CT scan for at least 3 months without evidence of cerebral edema and no requirements for corticosteroids or anticonvulsants. History of difficulty swallowing, malabsorption or other chronic gastro-intestinal disease, or conditions that may hamper compliance and/or absorption of the tested product. Known human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) positivity, active hepatitis C, or active hepatitis B. Has undergone surgical intervention within 28 days from Day 1 of trial drug treatment. Has received extensive prior radiotherapy on more than 30% of bone marrow reserves, or prior bone marrow/stem cell transplantation within 5 years from Day 1 of trial drug treatment. Has history of any other significant medical disease such as major gastric or small bowel surgery, recent drainage of significant volumes of ascites or pleural effusion or has a psychiatric condition that might impair the subject well-being or preclude full participation in the trial. Has known hypersensitivity to dacarbazine. Is a pregnant or nursing female. Participated in another clinical trial within the past 28 days. Has creatine phosphokinase (CPK) level at baseline National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Grade >=2 (i.e > 2.5 * ULN), and/or has a previous history of myositis or rhabdomyolysis. Is suitable for treatment with an approved B-Raf inhibitor (exclusion criteria implemented in German amendment only).
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Study Director
Organizational Affiliation
EMD Serono Inc., a business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Birmingham
State/Province
Alabama
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Tucson
State/Province
Arizona
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
San Francisco
State/Province
California
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Miami Beach
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Maywood
State/Province
Illinois
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
Country
United States
Facility Name
Please contact the US Medical Information in
City
Rockland
State/Province
Massachusetts
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Morristown
State/Province
New Jersey
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
New York
State/Province
New York
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Madison
State/Province
Wisconsin
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Adelaide, SA
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Albury/Wodonga
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Auchenflower
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Box Hill
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Greenslopes
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Herston
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Malvern
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Research Site
City
North Sydney
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Prahran
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Wendouree
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Woodville South
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Research site
City
Woolloongabba
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Brussel
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Bruxelles
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Edegem
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Bordeaux
Country
France
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Brest
Country
France
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Dijon
Country
France
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Lille
Country
France
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Lyon
Country
France
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Marseille
Country
France
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Montpellier
Country
France
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Nantes
Country
France
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Paris
Country
France
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Pierre Benite
Country
France
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Rennes
Country
France
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Toulouse
Country
France
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Villejuif
Country
France
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Augsburg
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Berlin
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Bonn
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Buxtehude
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research site
City
Düsseldorf
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Erlangen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Essen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Frankfurt am Main
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Hamburg
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Hannover
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Kiel
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Köln
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Leipzig
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Magdeburg
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Mainz
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research site
City
München
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Münster
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Plauen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Tübingen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Würzburg
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Jerusalem
Country
Israel
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Ramat-Gan
Country
Israel
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Tel-Aviv
Country
Israel
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Bari
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Genova
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Meldola - FC
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Milano
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Napoli
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Padova
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Roma
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Siena
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Groningen
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Rotterdam
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Utrecht
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Christchurch
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Hamilton
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Palmerston North
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Tauranga
Country
New Zealand
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Durban
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Johannesburg
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Pietermaritzburg
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Pretoria
Country
South Africa
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Badalona
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Barcelona
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Research Site
City
l'Hospitalet de Llobregat
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Madrid
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Majadahonda
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Málaga
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Pamplona
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Sevilla
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Göteborg
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Stockholm
Country
Sweden
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Basel
Country
Switzerland
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Zürich
Country
Switzerland
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Cambridge
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Research Site
City
London
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Manchester
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Newcastle upon Tyne
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Southampton
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
32610581
Citation
Lebbe C, Dutriaux C, Lesimple T, Kruit W, Kerger J, Thomas L, Guillot B, Braud F, Garbe C, Grob JJ, Loquai C, Ferraresi V, Robert C, Vasey P, Conry R, Isaacs R, Espinosa E, Schueler A, Massimini G, Dreno B. Pimasertib Versus Dacarbazine in Patients With Unresectable NRAS-Mutated Cutaneous Melanoma: Phase II, Randomized, Controlled Trial with Crossover. Cancers (Basel). 2020 Jun 29;12(7):1727. doi: 10.3390/cancers12071727.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Phase II Trial of Pimasertib Versus Dacarbazine in N-Ras Mutated Cutaneous Melanoma

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs