Multicentric Comparative Randomized Study of the Single-incision Sling Ajust® Versus Suburethral Transobturator Slings.
Primary Purpose
Female Stress Urinary Incontinence
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Spain
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Ajust sling
Classical transobturator sling
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Female Stress Urinary Incontinence focused on measuring Stress urinary incontinence., Suburethral sling., Single-incision suburethral sling., Ajust., Transobturator tape.
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Stress urinary incontinence with urethral hypermobility.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Incapacity to understand the information or give their consent.
- Previous anti-incontinence surgery with slings.
- Urethral hypomobility (Q-tip test <30º).
- Low pressure urethra (MUCP < 20cmH2O).
- Detrusor overactivity.
Sites / Locations
- Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
- Hospital de Viladecans
- Hospital de Palamós
- Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
- Hospital Universitari de Girona Dr. Josep Trueta
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Ajust
Classical transobturator tape
Arm Description
Experimental group: surgery to treat stress urinary incontinence with the sling Ajust®
Control group: surgery to treat stress urinary incontinence with the Align® sling.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Comparison of the cure rates between the single incision sling Ajust and classical transobturator tapes.
Percentage of patients who are regarded as cured or improved based on the following criteria:
Improvement on the International consultation on Incontinence Urinary Questionnaire-Short Form 1 year after the surgery.
Negative Cough Stress test 1 year after surgery.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Number of participants with adverse events
Comparison of the intra- and postoperative complications between procedures
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT01699425
First Posted
September 22, 2012
Last Updated
March 27, 2017
Sponsor
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute
Collaborators
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona Dr. Josep Trueta, Hospital de Viladecans, Serveis de Salut Integrats Baix Empordà
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01699425
Brief Title
Multicentric Comparative Randomized Study of the Single-incision Sling Ajust® Versus Suburethral Transobturator Slings.
Official Title
Multicentric Comparative Randomized Study of the Single-incision Sling Ajust® Versus Suburethral Transobturator Slings.
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 2013 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
April 2016 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 2016 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron Research Institute
Collaborators
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge, Institut d'Investigació Biomèdica de Girona Dr. Josep Trueta, Hospital de Viladecans, Serveis de Salut Integrats Baix Empordà
4. Oversight
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The transobturator tension-free vaginal tape (TOT) procedure has demonstrated high cure rates comparable to those obtained by retropubic suburethral tape, becoming the first line treatment for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in many cases. The TOT procedure is not exempt from complications such as bleeding, bladder injuries and pain in the thigh/groin. In addition it is commonly performed under general or regional anesthesia1-3. The single-incision mini-slings (SIMS) were developed to reduce the risk of complications by avoiding the blind passage of the trocars through the obturator space. In addition, the use of SIMS could enable surgeons to perform the procedure truly under local anesthesia.
Different devices for SIMS procedure are available. However, the evidence about their efficacy is controversial4-7. The main limitation of these devices could be the predetermined length of the mesh and the weakness on its fixation. The design of the SIMS Ajust® allows adjusting the length of the sling to each individual woman and provides a robust fixation into the obturator membrane. Recent prospective studies on the efficacy and safety of the sling Ajust® have obtained promising results8,9. Even so, the NICE guidelines advise to use SIMS in the context of research studies10.
The objective of this study is to establish if the effectiveness of the SIMS Ajust® is non-inferior to that of a standard TOT, as well as to compare the comorbidity of both procedures. Owing to the new appearance and fast evolution of these procedures, randomized comparative studies with SIMS are required in order to determine its place in the treatment of SUI.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Female Stress Urinary Incontinence
Keywords
Stress urinary incontinence., Suburethral sling., Single-incision suburethral sling., Ajust., Transobturator tape.
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
60 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Ajust
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Experimental group: surgery to treat stress urinary incontinence with the sling Ajust®
Arm Title
Classical transobturator tape
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Control group: surgery to treat stress urinary incontinence with the Align® sling.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Ajust sling
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Classical transobturator sling
Other Intervention Name(s)
Align®
Intervention Description
Control group
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Comparison of the cure rates between the single incision sling Ajust and classical transobturator tapes.
Description
Percentage of patients who are regarded as cured or improved based on the following criteria:
Improvement on the International consultation on Incontinence Urinary Questionnaire-Short Form 1 year after the surgery.
Negative Cough Stress test 1 year after surgery.
Time Frame
Up to one year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of participants with adverse events
Description
Comparison of the intra- and postoperative complications between procedures
Time Frame
0, 1, 6 and 12 months after surgery
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Change in the Maximal Urethral Closure Pressure.
Description
Comparison of the changes in the Maximal Urethral Closure Pressure (cmH2O) measured preoperatively and 1 year after surgery.
Time Frame
One year after surgery.
10. Eligibility
Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
90 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Stress urinary incontinence with urethral hypermobility.
Exclusion Criteria:
Incapacity to understand the information or give their consent.
Previous anti-incontinence surgery with slings.
Urethral hypomobility (Q-tip test <30º).
Low pressure urethra (MUCP < 20cmH2O).
Detrusor overactivity.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital Universitari de Bellvitge
City
Hospitalet
State/Province
Barcelona
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital de Viladecans
City
Viladecans
State/Province
Barcelona
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital de Palamós
City
Palamós
State/Province
Girona
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron
City
Barcelona
ZIP/Postal Code
E-08035
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitari de Girona Dr. Josep Trueta
City
Girona
Country
Spain
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Multicentric Comparative Randomized Study of the Single-incision Sling Ajust® Versus Suburethral Transobturator Slings.
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs