search
Back to results

A Comparison of Two Adjunctive Treatments in Arthroscopic Cuff Repair

Primary Purpose

Rotator Cuff Tear

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Bone Trephination
Soft Tissue Trephination
Sponsored by
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Rotator Cuff Tear focused on measuring rotator cuff tear

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 90 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have failed standard non-surgical management of their rotator cuff tear, and who would benefit from a surgical repair of the cuff.
  • Failed medical management will be defined as persistent pain and disability despite adequate standard non-operative management for 6 months.

Medical management will be defined as:

  • The use of drugs including analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
  • Physiotherapy consisting of stretching, strengthening and local modalities (ultrasound, cryotherapy, etc)
  • Activity modification
  • Imaging, and intra-operative findings confirming a full thickness tear of the rotator cuff.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Characteristics of the cuff tear that render the cuff irrepairable: fatty infiltration in the muscles grade III (50%) or greater; superior subluxation of the humeral head; retraction of the cuff to the level of the glenoid rim.
  2. Partial thickness cuff tears.
  3. Significant shoulder comorbidities e.g. Bankart lesion, osteoarthritis
  4. Previous surgery on affected shoulder e.g. Previous rotator cuff repair.
  5. Patients with active worker's compensation claims
  6. Active joint or systemic infection
  7. Significant muscle paralysis
  8. Rotator cuff tear arthropathy
  9. Charcot's arthropathy
  10. Significant medical comorbidity that could alter the effectiveness of the surgical intervention (eg. Cervical radiculopathy, polymyalgia rheumatica)
  11. Major medical illness (life expectancy less then 1 year or unacceptably high operative risk)
  12. Unable to speak or read English/French
  13. Psychiatric illness that precludes informed consent
  14. Unwilling to be followed for 1 year
  15. Advanced physiologic age

Sites / Locations

  • The Ottawa Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Soft Tissue Trephination

Bone Trephination

Arm Description

Ten days prior to the standard rotator cuff repair, a trephination procedure will be carried out. The trephination procedure will take approximately 30 minutes to complete and will be carried out under local anesthesia. A needle will be placed through the skin over the shoulder and either into the bone or into the edge of the cuff tendon, depending on whether you are allocated to the "bone trephination" or "soft tissue trephination" groups. The needle will be used to make 6 small holes in either bone or the tendon in the shoulder in the area where the cuff is to be repaired.

Ten days prior to the standard rotator cuff repair, a trephination procedure will be carried out. The trephination procedure will take approximately 30 minutes to complete and will be carried out under local anesthesia. A needle will be placed through the skin over the shoulder and either into the bone or into the edge of the cuff tendon, depending on whether you are allocated to the "bone trephination" or "soft tissue trephination" groups. The needle will be used to make 6 small holes in either bone or the tendon in the shoulder in the area where the cuff is to be repaired.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index
The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) is a disease specific evaluation, proven to be an accurate and valid assessment of function after shoulder replacement. The WORC is a patient-reported measure, 19-question survey. Each question is measured using a visual analog scale rated from 0-100, where higher scores mean better outcome. These scores are combined and translated into a percentage out of 100. A higher total score indicates a better outcome.

Secondary Outcome Measures

American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) Scores
The ASES is a shoulder specific assessment divided into two sections: pain and activities of daily living (ADL). Pain is recorded on a visual analogue scale (0-10), lower scores indicate better outcomes. There are 10 activities of daily living questions, each are recorded on a 4 level likert scale (0-3), which a higher score indicates a better outcome. The overall score is an equal weight of the two sections and produces a score out of 100. The higher the score, the better the outcome.
The Constant Score
The Constant Score reflects an overall clinical functional assessment. This instrument is based on a 100-point scoring system. Subjective findings (pain, activities of daily living, and working in different positions) make up a total of 35 points. Objective measurements make up the remaining 65 points.The test is divided into four sub-categories: (1) pain is measured using 4 likert levels (15 points maximum), where a higher score indicates a better outcome; activities of daily living are measured using a likert scale, where a higher number indicates better outcomes (20 points maximum); mobility is measured by an assessor, and rated using a likert scale where a higher score indicates better outcomes (40 points maximum); finally, strength is measured by an assessor where 1 point is given per 0.5kg of force (maximum 25 points), a higher score indicates better outcomes. All categories are added together, and a total score out of 100 is given (higher score indicates better outcome).
Healing Rates
Imaging parameters will be examined using ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). These images will be analyzed to determine healing status of the tissues post-operatively. Imaging will determine whether the tissue is healed, partially torn, or fully torn after surgery. Higher incidence of tearing will be compared between groups. A higher incidence of tearing indicates worse outcomes.

Full Information

First Posted
July 24, 2012
Last Updated
September 16, 2020
Sponsor
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Collaborators
University of Ottawa
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT01706978
Brief Title
A Comparison of Two Adjunctive Treatments in Arthroscopic Cuff Repair
Official Title
A Comparison of Two Adjunctive Treatments in Arthroscopic Cuff Repair: Soft Tissue or Bone Trephination, a Prospective Cohort Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
April 2012 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
Collaborators
University of Ottawa

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This Clinical Trial is being conducted to study two adjunctive treatments for rotator cuff repair; soft tissue and bone trephination. "Trephination" is a procedure that involves making small perforations either in the torn tendon near its edge, or in the bone that the tendon is repaired to. The rotator cuff is repaired by sewing the tendon down to the bone in the shoulder. Trephination is a new technique that is used in addition to the standard method of repairing the rotator cuff tendon. This study will help to determine whether this technique improves the speed of healing, the strength and the re-tear rate of the repair. You are being asked to take part in this study because you have a tear of the rotator cuff that requires surgical treatment. A total of 90 participants will participate in this study.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rotator Cuff Tear
Keywords
rotator cuff tear

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
176 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Soft Tissue Trephination
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Ten days prior to the standard rotator cuff repair, a trephination procedure will be carried out. The trephination procedure will take approximately 30 minutes to complete and will be carried out under local anesthesia. A needle will be placed through the skin over the shoulder and either into the bone or into the edge of the cuff tendon, depending on whether you are allocated to the "bone trephination" or "soft tissue trephination" groups. The needle will be used to make 6 small holes in either bone or the tendon in the shoulder in the area where the cuff is to be repaired.
Arm Title
Bone Trephination
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Ten days prior to the standard rotator cuff repair, a trephination procedure will be carried out. The trephination procedure will take approximately 30 minutes to complete and will be carried out under local anesthesia. A needle will be placed through the skin over the shoulder and either into the bone or into the edge of the cuff tendon, depending on whether you are allocated to the "bone trephination" or "soft tissue trephination" groups. The needle will be used to make 6 small holes in either bone or the tendon in the shoulder in the area where the cuff is to be repaired.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Bone Trephination
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Soft Tissue Trephination
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index
Description
The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) is a disease specific evaluation, proven to be an accurate and valid assessment of function after shoulder replacement. The WORC is a patient-reported measure, 19-question survey. Each question is measured using a visual analog scale rated from 0-100, where higher scores mean better outcome. These scores are combined and translated into a percentage out of 100. A higher total score indicates a better outcome.
Time Frame
From baseline to up until 24-Months Post-Operative
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) Scores
Description
The ASES is a shoulder specific assessment divided into two sections: pain and activities of daily living (ADL). Pain is recorded on a visual analogue scale (0-10), lower scores indicate better outcomes. There are 10 activities of daily living questions, each are recorded on a 4 level likert scale (0-3), which a higher score indicates a better outcome. The overall score is an equal weight of the two sections and produces a score out of 100. The higher the score, the better the outcome.
Time Frame
From baseline to up until 24-Months Post-Operative
Title
The Constant Score
Description
The Constant Score reflects an overall clinical functional assessment. This instrument is based on a 100-point scoring system. Subjective findings (pain, activities of daily living, and working in different positions) make up a total of 35 points. Objective measurements make up the remaining 65 points.The test is divided into four sub-categories: (1) pain is measured using 4 likert levels (15 points maximum), where a higher score indicates a better outcome; activities of daily living are measured using a likert scale, where a higher number indicates better outcomes (20 points maximum); mobility is measured by an assessor, and rated using a likert scale where a higher score indicates better outcomes (40 points maximum); finally, strength is measured by an assessor where 1 point is given per 0.5kg of force (maximum 25 points), a higher score indicates better outcomes. All categories are added together, and a total score out of 100 is given (higher score indicates better outcome).
Time Frame
From baseline to up until 24-Months Post-Operative
Title
Healing Rates
Description
Imaging parameters will be examined using ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). These images will be analyzed to determine healing status of the tissues post-operatively. Imaging will determine whether the tissue is healed, partially torn, or fully torn after surgery. Higher incidence of tearing will be compared between groups. A higher incidence of tearing indicates worse outcomes.
Time Frame
From surgery to up until 24-Months Post-Operative

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
90 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients who have failed standard non-surgical management of their rotator cuff tear, and who would benefit from a surgical repair of the cuff. Failed medical management will be defined as persistent pain and disability despite adequate standard non-operative management for 6 months. Medical management will be defined as: The use of drugs including analgesics and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs Physiotherapy consisting of stretching, strengthening and local modalities (ultrasound, cryotherapy, etc) Activity modification Imaging, and intra-operative findings confirming a full thickness tear of the rotator cuff. Exclusion Criteria: Characteristics of the cuff tear that render the cuff irrepairable: fatty infiltration in the muscles grade III (50%) or greater; superior subluxation of the humeral head; retraction of the cuff to the level of the glenoid rim. Partial thickness cuff tears. Significant shoulder comorbidities e.g. Bankart lesion, osteoarthritis Previous surgery on affected shoulder e.g. Previous rotator cuff repair. Patients with active worker's compensation claims Active joint or systemic infection Significant muscle paralysis Rotator cuff tear arthropathy Charcot's arthropathy Significant medical comorbidity that could alter the effectiveness of the surgical intervention (eg. Cervical radiculopathy, polymyalgia rheumatica) Major medical illness (life expectancy less then 1 year or unacceptably high operative risk) Unable to speak or read English/French Psychiatric illness that precludes informed consent Unwilling to be followed for 1 year Advanced physiologic age
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Peter Lapner, MD
Organizational Affiliation
The Ottawa Hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Guy Trudel, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Ottawa
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
The Ottawa Hospital
City
Ottawa
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
K1H 8L6
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
31036422
Citation
Campbell TM, Lapner P, Dilworth FJ, Sheikh MA, Laneuville O, Uhthoff H, Trudel G. Tendon contains more stem cells than bone at the rotator cuff repair site. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Sep;28(9):1779-1787. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2019.02.008. Epub 2019 Apr 26.
Results Reference
result

Learn more about this trial

A Comparison of Two Adjunctive Treatments in Arthroscopic Cuff Repair

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs